83 FR 1023 - Welded Line Pipe From Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 6 (January 9, 2018)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 6 (January 9, 2018)
| Page Range | 1023-1025 | |
| FR Document | 2018-00183 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 9, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 1023-1025] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-00183] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-580-876] Welded Line Pipe From Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on welded line pipe (WLP) from Korea. The period of review (POR) is May 22, 2015, through November 30, 2016. This administrative review covers 24 producers and/ or exporters of the subject merchandise. Commerce selected two mandatory respondents for individual examination: Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai Steel) and SeAH Steel Company (SeAH). We preliminarily determine that sales of subject merchandise have been made below normal value (NV) during the POR. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable January 9, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Goldberger or Ross Belliveau, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4136 or (202) 482-4952, respectively. Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is welded line pipe.\1\ The product is currently classified under the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) item numbers: 7305.11.1030, 7305.11.1060, 7305.11.5000, 7305.12.1030, 7305.12.1060, 7305.12.5000, 7305.19.1030, 7305.19.5000, 7306.19.1010, 7306.19.1050, 7306.19.5110, and 7306.19.5150. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and for customs purposes, the written product description remains dispositive. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ For a complete description of the Scope of the Order, see Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the 2015-2016 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Welded Line Pipe from Korea,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export price and constructed export price are calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. NV is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov, and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. A list of the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as the Appendix to this notice. [[Page 1024]] Preliminary Results of the Review As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine the following weighted-average dumping margins for the period May 22, 2015, through November 30, 2016: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ As discussed in Welded Line Pipe from the Republic of Korea: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 80 FR 61366 (October 13, 2015), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at 1, Hyundai HYSCO merged with Hyundai Steel subsequent to the period of investigation and Hyundai HYSCO no longer exists. Accordingly, our examination of Hyundai Steel includes entries made by Hyundai HYSCO prior to the date of the merger. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Exporter/producer dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hyundai Steel Company/Hyundai HYSCO \2\................. 19.42 SeAH Steel Company...................................... 2.30 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to the Following Companies: \3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ This rate is based on the simple average margin using the publicly-ranged data calculated for those companies selected for individual review. Because we cannot apply our normal methodology of calculating a weighted-average margin due to requests to protect business proprietary information, we find this rate to be the best proxy of the actual weighted-average margin determined for the mandatory respondents. See Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from France, et al.: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews, Final Results of Changed-Circumstances Review, and Revocation of an Order in Part, 75 FR 53661, 53663 (September 1, 2010); see also Memorandum, ``Calculation of the Review-Specific Average Rate for the Preliminary Results,'' dated concurrently with this notice. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Exporter/producer dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ AJU BESTEEL CO., Ltd.................................... 10.86 Daewoo International Corporation........................ 10.86 Dong Yang Steel Pipe.................................... 10.86 Dongbu Incheon Steel Co................................. 10.86 Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd................................... 10.86 Dongkuk Steel Mill...................................... 10.86 EEW Korea Co, Ltd....................................... 10.86 HISTEEL Co., Ltd........................................ 10.86 Husteel Co., Ltd........................................ 10.86 Keonwood Metals Co., Ltd................................ 10.86 Kolon Global Corp....................................... 10.86 Korea Cast Iron Pipe Ind. Co., Ltd...................... 10.86 Miju Steel MFG Co., Ltd................................. 10.86 MSTEEL Co., Ltd......................................... 10.86 NEXTEEL Co., Ltd........................................ 10.86 Poongsan Valinox (Valtimet Division).................... 10.86 POSCO................................................... 10.86 Sam Kang M&T Co., Ltd................................... 10.86 Sin Sung Metal Co., Ltd................................. 10.86 Soon-Hong Trading Company............................... 10.86 Steel Flower Co., Ltd................................... 10.86 TGS Pipe................................................ 10.86 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Assessment Rates Upon completion of the administrative review, Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), where Hyundai Steel and SeAH reported the entered value for of their U.S. sales, we calculated importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales to the total entered value of the sales for which entered value was reported. Where Hyundai Steel did not report entered value, we calculated the entered value in order to calculate the assessment rate. Where either the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. For the companies which were not selected for individual review, we will assign an assessment rate based on the average \4\ of the cash deposit rates calculated for Hyundai Steel and SeAH. The final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review and for future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ This rate was calculated as discussed in footnote 3, above. \5\ See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- We intend to issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for each specific company listed above will be that established in the final results of this review, except if the rate is less than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for previously investigated companies not participating in this review, the cash deposit will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the company participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, or the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent segment for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 4.38 percent, the all-others rate established in the LTFV investigation.\6\ These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See Welded Line Pipe from the Republic of Korea and the Republic of Turkey: Antidumping Duty Orders, 80 FR 75056, 75057 (December 1, 2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclosure and Public Comment Commerce intends to disclose the calculations performed in connection with these preliminary results to interested parties within five days after the date of publication of this notice.\7\ Interested parties may submit case briefs not later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.\8\ Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed no later than five days after the time limit for filing case briefs.\9\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\10\ Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed using ACCESS.\11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b). \8\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii). \9\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1). \10\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). \11\ See 19 CFR 351.303. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS. An electronically-filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by ACCESS by 5 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.\12\ Hearing requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; [[Page 1025]] and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to issues raised in the briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, parties will be notified of the time and date for the hearing to be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230.\13\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). \13\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of its analysis raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the publication of these preliminary results in the Federal Register, unless otherwise extended.\14\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ See Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: January 2, 2018. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Discussion of the Methodology A. Normal Value Comparisons 1. Determination of Comparison Method 2. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis B. Product Comparisons C. Export Price and Constructed Export Price D. Normal Value 1. Particular Market Situation 2. Home Market Viability and Selection of Comparison Market 3. Affiliated Party Transactions and Arm's-Length Test 4. Level of Trade 5. Cost of Production Analysis 6. Calculation of NV Based on Comparison Market Prices 7. Calculation of NV Based on CV E. Currency Conversion V. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2018-00183 Filed 1-8-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 9, 2018 / Notices 1023
SA513 Type 3), ASTM A–513 Type 4 (ASME • ASTM A–179 (ASME SA 179); FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SA513 Type 4), ASTM A–513 Type 5 (ASME • ASTM A–192 (ASME SA 192); David Goldberger or Ross Belliveau,
SA513 Type 5), ASTM A–513 Type 6 (ASME • ASTM A–209 (ASME SA 209); AD/CVD Operations, Office II,
SA513 Type 6), ASTM A–519 (cold-finished); • ASTM A–210 (ASME SA 210);
Enforcement and Compliance,
(2) SAE International (Society of • ASTM A–213 (ASME SA 213);
Automotive Engineers) specifications SAE • ASTM A–334 (ASME SA 334); International Trade Administration,
J524, SAE J525, SAE J2833, SAE J2614, SAE • ASTM A–423 (ASME SA 423); U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
J2467, SAE J2435, SAE J2613; • ASTM A–498; Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
(3) Aerospace Material Specification (AMS) • ASTM A–496 (ASME SA 496); DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4136 or
AMS T–6736 (AMS 6736), AMS 6371, AMS • ASTM A–199; (202) 482–4952, respectively.
5050, AMS 5075, AMS 5062, AMS 6360, • ASTM A–500;
AMS 6361, AMS 6362, AMS 6371, AMS • ASTM A–556; Scope of the Order
6372, AMS 6374, AMS 6381, AMS 6415; • ASTM A–565;
(4) United States Military Standards (MIL) • API 5L; and The merchandise subject to the order
MIL–T–5066 and MIL–T–6736; • API 5CT is welded line pipe.1 The product is
(5) foreign standards equivalent to one of except that any cold-drawn tubing product currently classified under the following
the previously listed ASTM, ASME, SAE, certified to one of the above excluded Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
AMS or MIL specifications including but not specifications will not be excluded from the United States (HTSUS) item numbers:
limited to: scope if it is also dual- or multiple-certified
(a) German Institute for Standardization 7305.11.1030, 7305.11.1060,
to any other specification that otherwise
(DIN) specifications DIN 2391–2, DIN 2393– 7305.11.5000, 7305.12.1030,
would fall within the scope of this
2, DIN 2394–2); investigation. 7305.12.1060, 7305.12.5000,
(b) European Standards (EN) EN 10305–1, The products subject to the investigation 7305.19.1030, 7305.19.5000,
EN 10305–2, EN 10305–3, EN 10305–4, EN are currently classified in the Harmonized 7306.19.1010, 7306.19.1050,
10305–6 and European national variations on Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 7306.19.5110, and 7306.19.5150.
those standards (e.g., British Standard (BS under item numbers: 7304.31.3000, Although the HTSUS numbers are
EN), Irish Standard (IS EN) and German 7304.31.6050, 7304.51.1000, 7304.51.5005, provided for convenience and for
Standard (DIN EN) variations, etc.); 7304.51.5060, 7306.30.5015, 7306.30.5020,
(c) Japanese Industrial Standard (JIS) JIS G customs purposes, the written product
7306.50.5030. Subject merchandise may also
3441 and JIS G 3445; and description remains dispositive.
enter under numbers 7306.30.1000 and
(6) proprietary standards that are based on 7306.50.1000. The HTSUS subheadings Methodology
one of the above-listed standards. above are provided for convenience and
The subject cold-drawn mechanical tubing customs purposes only. The written Commerce is conducting this review
may also be dual or multiple certified to description of the scope of the investigation in accordance with section 751(a) of the
more than one standard. Pipe that is multiple is dispositive.
certified as cold-drawn mechanical tubing Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
and to other specifications not covered by [FR Doc. 2018–00187 Filed 1–8–18; 8:45 am] Export price and constructed export
this scope, is also covered by the scope of BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P price are calculated in accordance with
this investigation when it meets the physical section 772 of the Act. NV is calculated
description set forth above. in accordance with section 773 of the
Steel products included in the scope of this DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Act.
investigation are products in which: (1) Iron
predominates, by weight, over each of the International Trade Administration For a full description of the
other contained elements; and (2) the carbon methodology underlying our
content is 2 percent or less by weight. [A–580–876] conclusions, see the Preliminary
For purposes of this scope, the place of Decision Memorandum. The
cold-drawing determines the country of Welded Line Pipe From Korea: Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a
origin of the subject merchandise. Subject Preliminary Results of Antidumping public document and is on file
merchandise that is subject to minor working Duty Administrative Review; 2015– electronically via Enforcement and
in a third country that occurs after drawing
2016 Compliance’s Antidumping and
in one of the subject countries including, but
not limited to, heat treatment, cutting to Countervailing Duty Centralized
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
length, straightening, nondestruction testing, Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
International Trade Administration,
deburring or chamfering, remains within the ACCESS is available to registered users
Department of Commerce.
scope of this investigation. at http://access.trade.gov, and to all
All products that meet the written physical SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce parties in the Central Records Unit,
description are within the scope of this (Commerce) is conducting an room B8024 of the main Department of
investigation unless specifically excluded or administrative review of the Commerce building. In addition, a
covered by the scope of an existing order. antidumping duty order on welded line complete version of the Preliminary
Merchandise that meets the physical pipe (WLP) from Korea. The period of
description of cold-drawn mechanical tubing Decision Memorandum can be accessed
review (POR) is May 22, 2015, through directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/
above is within the scope of the investigation
November 30, 2016. This administrative frn/. The signed and electronic versions
even if it is also dual or multiple certified to
an otherwise excluded specification listed review covers 24 producers and/or of the Preliminary Decision
below. The following products are outside of, exporters of the subject merchandise. Memorandum are identical in content.
and/or specifically excluded from, the scope Commerce selected two mandatory A list of the topics discussed in the
of this investigation: respondents for individual examination: Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
(1) Cold-drawn stainless steel tubing, Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
attached as the Appendix to this notice.
containing 10.5 percent or more of chromium Steel) and SeAH Steel Company (SeAH).
by weight and not more than 1.2 percent of We preliminarily determine that sales of 1 For a complete description of the Scope of the
carbon by weight; subject merchandise have been made Order, see Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum
(2) products certified to one or more of the
below normal value (NV) during the for the Preliminary Results of the 2015–2016
ASTM, ASME or American Petroleum Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty
Institute (API) specifications listed below: POR. Interested parties are invited to
Order on Welded Line Pipe from Korea,’’ dated
• ASTM A–53; comment on these preliminary results. concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this
• ASTM A–106; DATES: Applicable January 9, 2018. notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:58 Jan 08, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09JAN1.SGM 09JAN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_1029/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 9, 2018 / Notices 1025
and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE must state the reasons for the request.
Issues raised in the hearing will be Commerce will grant the request unless
limited to issues raised in the briefs. If International Trade Administration it finds compelling reasons to deny the
a request for a hearing is made, parties [A–533–877, A–570–064] request.
will be notified of the time and date for On December 18, 2017, the petitioners
the hearing to be held at the U.S. Stainless Steel Flanges From India and submitted a timely request that
Department of Commerce, 1401 the People’s Republic of China: Commerce postpone the preliminary
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, Postponement of Preliminary determinations in these LTFV
DC 20230.13 Determinations in the Less-Than-Fair- investigations.3 The petitioners stated
Commerce intends to issue the final Value Investigations that they request postponement ‘‘in
results of this administrative review, order to ensure that {Commerce} has
including the results of its analysis AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration, sufficient time to review all
raised in any written briefs, not later questionnaire responses and request
than 120 days after the publication of Department of Commerce.
clarification and/or additional
these preliminary results in the Federal DATE: Applicable January 9, 2018.
information as necessary, so that the
Register, unless otherwise extended.14 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: preliminary determinations will reflect
Courtney Canales at (202) 482–4997 the most accurate results possible.’’ 4
Notification to Importers
(India) and Ian Hamilton at (202) 482–
This notice also serves as a For the reasons stated above and
4798 (the People’s Republic of China
preliminary reminder to importers of because there are no compelling reasons
(China)), AD/CVD Operations,
their responsibility under 19 CFR to deny the request, Commerce, in
Enforcement and Compliance,
351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding accordance with section 733(c)(1)(A) of
International Trade Administration,
the reimbursement of antidumping the Act, is postponing the deadline for
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
duties prior to liquidation of the the preliminary determinations by 50
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
relevant entries during this review DC 20230. days (i.e., 190 days after the date on
period. Failure to comply with this which these investigations were
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
requirement could result in Commerce’s initiated). As a result, Commerce will
presumption that reimbursement of Background issue its preliminary determinations no
antidumping duties occurred and the On September 5, 2017, the later than March 14, 2018. In
subsequent assessment of double Department of Commerce (Commerce) accordance with section 735(a)(1) of the
antidumping duties. initiated less-than-fair-value (LTFV) Act and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(1), the
We are issuing and publishing these investigations of imports of stainless deadline for the final determinations of
results in accordance with sections steel flanges from India and China.1 these investigations will continue to be
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Currently, the preliminary 75 days after the date of publication of
determinations are due no later than the preliminary determinations, unless
Dated: January 2, 2018.
January 23, 2018. postponed at a later date.
Christian Marsh,
This notice is issued and published
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement Postponement of Preliminary pursuant to section 733(c)(2) of the Act
and Compliance. Determinations and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1).
Appendix Section 733(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act Dated: January 3, 2018.
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires
Christian Marsh,
Decision Memorandum Commerce to issue the preliminary
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
determination in a LTFV investigation
I. Summary and Compliance.
II. Background within 140 days after the date on which
[FR Doc. 2018–00189 Filed 1–8–18; 8:45 am]
III. Scope of the Order Commerce initiated the investigation.
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
IV. Discussion of the Methodology However, section 733(c)(1)(A)(b)(1) of
A. Normal Value Comparisons the Act permits Commerce to postpone
1. Determination of Comparison Method the preliminary determination until no
2. Results of the Differential Pricing DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
later than 190 days after the date on
Analysis which Commerce initiated the
B. Product Comparisons National Oceanic and Atmospheric
C. Export Price and Constructed Export
investigation if: (A) The petitioners 2 Administration
Price submit a timely request for a
D. Normal Value postponement; or (B) Commerce
RIN 0648–XF897
1. Particular Market Situation concludes that the parties concerned are
2. Home Market Viability and Selection of cooperating, that the investigation is Endangered and Threatened Species;
Comparison Market extraordinarily complicated, and that
3. Affiliated Party Transactions and Arm’s- Recovery Plans
additional time is necessary to make a
Length Test
4. Level of Trade
preliminary determination. Under 19 AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
5. Cost of Production Analysis CFR 351.205(e), the petitioners must Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
6. Calculation of NV Based on Comparison submit a request for postponement 25 Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Market Prices days or more before the scheduled date Commerce.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
7. Calculation of NV Based on CV of the preliminary determination and
E. Currency Conversion 3 See the Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Stainless Steel
V. Recommendation 1 SeeStainless Steel Flanges from India and the Flanges from India: the Petitioners’ Request to
[FR Doc. 2018–00183 Filed 1–8–18; 8:45 am] People’s Republic of China: Initiation of Less-Than- Extend the Preliminary Determination,’’ dated
Fair-Value Investigations, 82 FR 42649 (September December 18, 2017; Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Stainless
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
11, 2017). Steel Flanges from the People’s Republic of China:
2 The petitioners are the Coalition of American the Petitioners’ Request to Extend the Preliminary
13 Id. Determination,’’ dated December 18, 2017.
Flange Producers and its individual members, Core
14 See Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Pipe Products, Inc. and Maass Flange Corporation. 4 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:58 Jan 08, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09JAN1.SGM 09JAN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_1029/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-01-09 02:18:43
Document Modified: 2018-01-09 02:18:43
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable January 9, 2018. | |
| Contact | David Goldberger or Ross Belliveau, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4136 or (202) 482-4952, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 1023 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR