83 FR 11652 - Approval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated Facilities and Pollutants; New Hampshire; Delegation of Authority
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 52 (March 16, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 52 (March 16, 2018)
| Page Range | 11652-11654 | |
| FR Document | 2018-05316 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 52 (Friday, March 16, 2018)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 11652-11654] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-05316] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 62 [EPA-R01-OAR-2018-0069; FRL-9975-17--Region 1] Approval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated Facilities and Pollutants; New Hampshire; Delegation of Authority AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a request from the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (NH DES) for delegation of authority to implement and enforce the Federal Plan Requirements for Sewage Sludge Incineration Units Constructed on or before October 14, 2010 (SSI Federal Plan). under Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: Written comments must be received on or before April 16, 2018. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R01- OAR-2018-0069 at www.regulations.gov, or via email to bird.patrick@epa.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is [[Page 11653]] restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. Publicly available docket materials are available at www.regulations.gov or at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, Office of Ecosystem Protection, Air Quality Planning Unit, 5 Post Office Square--Suite 100, Boston, MA. EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding legal holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Bird, Air Permits, Toxic, & Indoor Programs Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1, 5 Post Office Square--Suite 100, Mail Code: OEP05-2, Boston, MA 02109- 3912, tel. (617) 918-1287, email bird.patrick@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,'' ``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. Table of Contents I. What action is the EPA proposing to take today? II. What are the CAA requirements? III. What was submitted by the NH DES and how did the EPA respond? IV. What is the EPA's proposed conclusion? V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. What action is the EPA proposing to take today? The EPA is proposing to approve the NH DES request for delegation of authority to implement and enforce the SSI Federal Plan found at 40 CFR part 62 subpart LLL and to adhere to the terms and conditions prescribed in the Memorandum of Agreement (MoA) signed by the EPA and the NH DES, as further explained further in this action. The purpose of this SSI Federal Plan delegation is to transfer primary implementation and enforcement responsibility from the EPA to the NH DES for all affected facilities within the jurisdiction of the State of New Hampshire. However, nothing in this action, nor in the MoA, shall be construed to prohibit the EPA from enforcing the SSI Federal Plan. II. What are the CAA requirements? Sections 111(d) and 129 of the CAA require states to submit plans to control certain pollutants (designated pollutants) at existing solid waste combustor facilities (designated facilities) whenever standards of performance have been established under section 111(b) for new sources of the same type and the EPA has established emission guidelines for such existing sources. A designated pollutant is any pollutant for which no air quality criteria has been issued or which is not included on a list published under section 108(a) (national ambient air quality standards) or section 112 (hazardous air pollutants) of the CAA, but emissions of which would be subject to a standard of performance for new stationary sources under section 111(b). In addition, section 129 of the CAA also requires the EPA to promulgate emission guidelines for solid waste incineration units that emit specific air pollutants or a mixture of air pollutants. These pollutants include organics (dioxins and dibenzofurans), carbon monoxide, metals (cadmium, lead and mercury), acid gases (hydrogen chloride, sulfur dioxide and oxides of nitrogen), particulate matter and opacity (as appropriate). On March 21, 2011 (76 FR 15372), the EPA promulgated new source performance standards and emission guidelines for sewage sludge incineration (SSI) units at 40 CFR part 60 subparts LLLL and MMMM, respectively. The designated facility to which the emission guidelines applies is existing SSI units, as stipulated in subpart MMMM, that commenced construction on or before October 14, 2010. Pursuant to section 129 of the CAA, state plan requirements must be ``at least as protective'' as the emission guidelines and become federally enforceable upon approval by the EPA. The procedures for adoption and submittal of state plans are codified in 40 CFR part 60, subpart B. For states that fail to submit a plan, the EPA is required to develop and implement a Federal Plan within two years following promulgation of the emission guidelines. The EPA implementation and enforcement of the Federal Plan is viewed as an interim measure until states assume their role as the preferred implementers of the emission guidelines requirements stipulated in the Federal Plan. Accordingly, the EPA promulgated the SSI Federal Plan on April 29, 2016. In this rulemaking, the EPA strongly encouraged state and local agencies in jurisdictions that did not submit approvable State Plans to request delegation of the SSI Federal Plan so that they can have the primary responsibility for implementing and enforcing regulations affecting existing source SSI unit, consistent with the intent of section 129 of the CAA. III. What was submitted by the NH DES and how did the EPA respond? On November 14, 2017, the NH DES submitted to the EPA a request for delegation of authority to implement and enforce the SSI Federal Plan. The EPA evaluated the NH DES request for delegation pursuant to the provisions of the SSI Federal Plan and the EPA's Delegation Manual.\1\ Section 62.15865 of the SSI Federal Plan establishes that a state may meet its CAA section 111(d)/129 obligations by submitting an acceptable written request for delegation of the Federal Plan that includes the following requirements: (1) A demonstration of adequate resources and legal authority to administer and enforce the Federal Plan; (2) an inventory of affected SSI units, an inventory of emissions from affected SSI units, and provisions for state progress reports (see items under Sec. [thinsp]60.5015(a)(1), (2) and (7) from the SSI emission guidelines); (3) certification that the hearing on the state delegation request, similar to the hearing for a state plan submittal, was held, a list of witnesses and their organizational affiliations, if any, appearing at the hearing, and a brief written summary of each presentation or written submission; and (4) a commitment to enter into a MoA with the Regional Administrator that sets forth the terms, conditions and effective date of the delegation and that serves as the mechanism for the transfer of authority. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Section 7-139 of the EPA's Delegation Manual is entitled ``Implementation and Enforcement of 111(d)(2) and 111(d)/129(b)(3) Federal Plans'' and the reader may refer to it in the docket for this rulemaking at www.regulations.gov (see Docket ID Number EPA- R01-OAR-2018-0069). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In parallel with our review of the delegation request, the EPA prepared the MoA which defines the policies, responsibilities, and procedures by which the SSI Federal Plan will be administered by both the NH DES and the EPA. The MoA is the mechanism for the transfer of responsibility from the EPA to the NH DES. [[Page 11654]] Both the EPA and the NH DES signed the MoA in which the parties agreed to the terms and conditions regarding the responsibility to implement and enforce the policies, responsibilities and procedures of the SSI Federal Plan. The MoA became effective upon signature by the EPA on December 22, 2017. Under the EPA's Delegation Manual, item 7-139, the Regional Administrator is authorized to delegate implementation and enforcement of sections 111(d)/129 Federal Plans to state environmental agencies. The Regional Administrator may consider delegating authority to implement and enforce Federal Plans to a state provided the following conditions are met: (1) The state does not already have an EPA approved State Plan; (2) the state submits a demonstration of adequate resources and legal authority to administer and enforce the Federal Plan; and (3) the state enters into a MoA with the Regional Administrator that sets forth the terms, conditions and effective date of the delegation and that serves as the mechanism for the transfer of authority. NH DES has met all of the EPA's delegation requirements as described above. The reader may view the NH DES letter to the EPA requesting delegation and the MoA signed by both parties at www.regulations.gov, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-R01-OAR-2018- 0069. IV. What is the EPA's proposed conclusion? The EPA has evaluated the NH DES submittal for consistency with the CAA, EPA regulations, and EPA policy. The NH DES has met all the requirements of the EPA's guidance for obtaining delegation of authority to implement and enforce the SSI Federal Plan. The NH DES entered into a MoA with the EPA, and it became effective on December 22, 2017. Accordingly, the EPA is proposing to approve the NH DES request dated November 14, 2017 for delegation of authority to implement and enforce the Federal Plan for existing SSI units. The EPA will continue to retain certain specific authorities reserved to the EPA in the SSI Federal Plan and as indicated in the MoA (e.g., authority to approve major alternatives to test methods or monitoring, etc.). V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a state plan submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA section 111(d) and 129(b)(2) and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7411(d) and 7429(b)(2); 40 CFR 62.02(a). Thus, in reviewing state plan submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves a state delegation request as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those already imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this rulemaking does not apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Administrative practice and procedure, Carbon monoxide, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Waste treatment and disposal. Dated: March 8, 2018. Alexandra Dapolito Dunn, Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1. [FR Doc. 2018-05316 Filed 3-15-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![11652 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 52 / Friday, March 16, 2018 / Proposed Rules
because the rule will have no (e) Use lists and tables wherever western edge of the park (approximately
substantial direct effect on federally possible. 1.17 miles).
recognized Indian tribes. If you feel that the NPS has not met (2) A map showing trails open to
Nevertheless, the NPS recognizes that these requirements, send the NPS bicycle use will be available at park
the park contains significant comments by one of the methods listed visitor centers and posted on the park
archeological sites and the Trail of in the ADDRESSES section. To better help website. The Superintendent will
Tears, which are considered very the NPS revise the rule, your comments provide notice of all bicycle route
important to the following tribes: should be as specific as possible. For designations in accordance with § 1.7 of
Absentee Shawnee Tribe, Cherokee example, you should identify the this chapter. The Superintendent may
Nation of Oklahoma, Jena Band of the numbers of the sections or paragraphs limit, restrict, or impose conditions on
Choctaw Indians, The Osage Nation, that you find unclear, which sections or bicycle use, or close any trail to bicycle
Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma, Quapaw sentences are too long, the sections use, or terminate such conditions,
Tribe of Oklahoma, United Keetoowah where you feel lists or tables would be closures, limits, or restrictions in
Band of Cherokee Indians, The useful, etc. accordance with § 4.30 of this chapter.
Chickasaw Nation, Caddo Nation, and (b) [Reserved]
Public Participation
the Muscogee (Creek) Nation. The park
It is the policy of the Department of Jason Larrabee,
consulted with these tribes throughout
the Interior, whenever practicable, to Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish
the development of the EA and
afford the public an opportunity to and Wildlife and Parks, Exercising the
incorporated comments by adjusting Authority of the Assistant Secretary for Fish
proposed trails to mitigate or avoid participate in the rulemaking process. and Wildlife and Parks.
impacts to these areas of interest. Accordingly, interested persons may
[FR Doc. 2018–05414 Filed 3–15–18; 8:45 am]
submit written comments regarding this
Paperwork Reduction Act proposed rule by one of the methods BILLING CODE 4310–EJ–P
This rule does not contain listed in the ADDRESSES section of this
information collection requirements, document.
and a submission to the Office of ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Public Availability of Comments AGENCY
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act is not Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other 40 CFR Part 62
required. The NPS may not conduct or
sponsor and you are not required to personal identifying information in your [EPA–R01–OAR–2018–0069; FRL–9975–
respond to a collection of information comment, you should be aware that 17—Region 1]
unless it displays a currently valid OMB your entire comment—including your
control number. personal identifying information—may Approval and Promulgation of State
be made publicly available at any time. Plans for Designated Facilities and
National Environmental Policy Act While you can ask the NPS in your Pollutants; New Hampshire; Delegation
The NPS has prepared the EA to comment to withhold your personal of Authority
determine whether this rule will have a identifying information from public AGENCY: Environmental Protection
significant impact on the quality of the review, the NPS cannot guarantee that it Agency (EPA).
human environment under the National will be able to do so.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
Environmental Policy Act of 1969. A
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 7
copy of the EA can be found online at SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
http://parkplanning.nps.gov/peri, by District of Columbia, National parks, Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
clicking on the link entitled ‘‘Trail Reporting and recordkeeping request from the New Hampshire
Master Plan/Environmental requirements. Department of Environmental Services
Assessment’’ and then clicking on the In consideration of the foregoing, the (NH DES) for delegation of authority to
link entitled ‘‘Document List.’’ National Park Service proposes to implement and enforce the Federal Plan
amend 36 CFR part 7 as set forth below: Requirements for Sewage Sludge
Effects on the Energy Supply (Executive
Order 13211) Incineration Units Constructed on or
PART 7—SPECIAL REGULATIONS,
before October 14, 2010 (SSI Federal
This rule is not a significant energy AREAS OF THE NATIONAL PARK
Plan). under Clean Air Act (CAA).
action under the definition in Executive SYSTEM
DATES: Written comments must be
Order 13211. A Statement of Energy
■ 1. The authority citation for part 7 received on or before April 16, 2018.
Effects in not required.
continues to read as follows: ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
Clarity of This Rule Authority: 54 U.S.C. 100101, 100751, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R01–
The NPS is required by Executive 320102; Sec. 7.96 also issued under D.C. OAR–2018–0069 at
Orders 12866 (section 1(b)(12)) and Code 10–137 and D.C. Code 50–2201.07. www.regulations.gov, or via email to
12988 (section 3(b)(1)(B)), and 13563 ■ 2. Add § 7.95 to read as follows: bird.patrick@epa.gov. For comments
(section 1(a)), and by the Presidential submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write § 7.95 Pea Ridge National Military Park. online instructions for submitting
all rules in plain language. This means (a) Bicycle Use. (1) The comments. Once submitted, comments
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
that each rule the NPS publishes must: Superintendent may designate all or cannot be edited or removed from
(a) Be logically organized; portions of the following trails as open Regulations.gov. For either manner of
(b) Use the active voice to address to bicycle use: submission, the EPA may publish any
readers directly; (i) A trail from U.S. Highway 62 to the comment received to its public docket.
(c) Use common, everyday words and visitor center (approximately 0.55 Do not submit electronically any
clear language rather than jargon; miles). information you consider to be
(d) Be divided into short sections and (ii) A trail from Arkansas Highway 72 Confidential Business Information (CBI)
sentences; and to the Sugar Creek Greenway on the or other information whose disclosure is
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:06 Mar 15, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16MRP1.SGM 16MRP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_11704/page/1.svg)
![11654 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 52 / Friday, March 16, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Both the EPA and the NH DES signed and 7429(b)(2); 40 CFR 62.02(a). Thus, List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
the MoA in which the parties agreed to in reviewing state plan submissions, Environmental protection, Air
the terms and conditions regarding the EPA’s role is to approve state choices, pollution control, Administrative
responsibility to implement and enforce provided that they meet the criteria of practice and procedure, Carbon
the policies, responsibilities and the CAA. Accordingly, this action monoxide, Intergovernmental relations,
procedures of the SSI Federal Plan. The merely approves a state delegation Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate
MoA became effective upon signature request as meeting Federal requirements matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
by the EPA on December 22, 2017. and does not impose additional requirements, Sulfur oxides, Waste
Under the EPA’s Delegation Manual, requirements beyond those already treatment and disposal.
item 7–139, the Regional Administrator imposed by state law. For that reason,
is authorized to delegate this action: Dated: March 8, 2018.
implementation and enforcement of • Is not a significant regulatory action Alexandra Dapolito Dunn,
sections 111(d)/129 Federal Plans to subject to review by the Office of Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1.
state environmental agencies. The Management and Budget under [FR Doc. 2018–05316 Filed 3–15–18; 8:45 am]
Regional Administrator may consider Executive Orders12866 (58 FR 51735, BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
delegating authority to implement and October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
enforce Federal Plans to a state provided January 21, 2011);
the following conditions are met: (1) ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
• Does not impose an information
The state does not already have an EPA AGENCY
collection burden under the provisions
approved State Plan; (2) the state
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
submits a demonstration of adequate 40 CFR Parts 260, 261, 264, 265, 268,
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
resources and legal authority to 270, and 273
administer and enforce the Federal Plan; • Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a [EPA–HQ–OLEM–2017–0463; FRL–9975–
and (3) the state enters into a MoA with 44–OLEM]
the Regional Administrator that sets substantial number of small entities
forth the terms, conditions and effective under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 RIN 2050–AG92
date of the delegation and that serves as U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
the mechanism for the transfer of • Does not contain any unfunded Increasing Recycling: Adding Aerosol
authority. mandate or significantly or uniquely Cans to the Universal Waste
NH DES has met all of the EPA’s affect small governments, as described Regulations
delegation requirements as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act AGENCY: Environmental Protection
above. The reader may view the NH DES of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); Agency (EPA).
letter to the EPA requesting delegation • Does not have Federalism
ACTION: Proposed rule.
and the MoA signed by both parties at implications as specified in Executive
www.regulations.gov, identified by Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Docket ID Number EPA–R01–OAR– 1999); Agency (EPA or the Agency) is
2018–0069. • Is not an economically significant proposing to add hazardous waste
IV. What is the EPA’s proposed regulatory action based on health or aerosol cans to the universal waste
conclusion? safety risks subject to Executive Order program under the federal Resource
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
The EPA has evaluated the NH DES • Is not a significant regulatory action regulations. This proposed change, once
submittal for consistency with the CAA, subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR finalized, would benefit the wide
EPA regulations, and EPA policy. The 28355, May 22, 2001); variety of establishments generating and
NH DES has met all the requirements of
the EPA’s guidance for obtaining • Is not subject to requirements of managing hazardous waste aerosol cans,
Section 12(d) of the National including the retail sector, by providing
delegation of authority to implement a clear, protective system for managing
and enforce the SSI Federal Plan. The Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because discarded aerosol cans. The streamlined
NH DES entered into a MoA with the universal waste regulations are expected
EPA, and it became effective on application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; to ease regulatory burdens on retail
December 22, 2017. Accordingly, the stores and others that discard hazardous
EPA is proposing to approve the NH and
• Does not provide EPA with the waste aerosol cans; promote the
DES request dated November 14, 2017 collection and recycling of these cans;
for delegation of authority to implement discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human and encourage the development of
and enforce the Federal Plan for existing municipal and commercial programs to
SSI units. The EPA will continue to health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible reduce the quantity of these wastes
retain certain specific authorities going to municipal solid waste landfills
reserved to the EPA in the SSI Federal methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). or combustors.
Plan and as indicated in the MoA (e.g.,
In addition, this rulemaking does not DATES: Comments must be received on
authority to approve major alternatives
to test methods or monitoring, etc.). apply on any Indian reservation land or or before May 15, 2018. Under the
in any other area where EPA or an Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA),
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
V. Statutory and Executive Order Indian tribe has demonstrated that a comments on the information collection
Reviews tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of provisions are best assured of
Under the Clean Air Act, the Indian country, the rule does not have consideration if the Office of
Administrator is required to approve a tribal implications and will not impose Management and Budget (OMB)
state plan submission that complies substantial direct costs on tribal receives a copy of your comments on or
with the provisions of the CAA section governments or preempt tribal law as before April 16, 2018.
111(d) and 129(b)(2) and applicable specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7411(d) FR 67249, November 9, 2000). identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:06 Mar 15, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16MRP1.SGM 16MRP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_11704/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-03-16 01:12:08
Document Modified: 2018-03-16 01:12:08
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Written comments must be received on or before April 16, 2018. | |
| Contact | Patrick Bird, Air Permits, Toxic, & Indoor Programs Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1, 5 Post Office Square--Suite 100, Mail Code: OEP05-2, Boston, MA 02109- 3912, tel. (617) 918-1287, email [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 11652 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Administrative Practice and Procedure; Carbon Monoxide; Intergovernmental Relations; Lead; Nitrogen Dioxide; Particulate Matter; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Sulfur Oxides and Waste Treatment and Disposal |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR