83 FR 12812 - Certain Collapsible Sockets for Mobile Electronic Devices and Components Thereof; Commission Determination To Review an Initial Determination in Part; Schedule for Filing Written Submissions on the Issues Under Review and on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 57 (March 23, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 57 (March 23, 2018)
| Page Range | 12812-12814 | |
| FR Document | 2018-05906 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 57 (Friday, March 23, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 12812-12814] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-05906] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337-TA-1056] Certain Collapsible Sockets for Mobile Electronic Devices and Components Thereof; Commission Determination To Review an Initial Determination in Part; Schedule for Filing Written Submissions on the Issues Under Review and on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to review-in-part the presiding administrative law judge's initial determination (Order No. 11) granting summary determination that the defaulting respondents have violated section 337 in the above-captioned investigation. The Commission requests certain briefing from the parties on the issues under review, as indicated in this notice. The Commission also requests briefing from the parties and interested persons on the issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lucy Grace D. Noyola, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-3438. Copies of non- confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205- 1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on May 15, 2017, based on a complaint filed on behalf of PopSockets LLC of Boulder, Colorado (``PopSockets'' or ``Complainant''). 82 FR 22348- 49 (May 15, 2017). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain collapsible sockets for mobile electronic devices and components thereof by reason of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,560,031 (``the '031 patent''). Id. The notice of investigation named as respondents Agomax Group Ltd. of Kowloon, Hong Kong; Hangzhou Hangkai Technology Co., Ltd. of Zhejiang, China; Yiwu Wentou Import & Export Co., Ltd. of Zhejiang, China; Shenzhen Enruize Technology Co., Ltd. of Shenzhen, China; and Guangzhou Xi Xun Electronics Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen Chuanghui Industry Co., Ltd. of Guangdong, China; Shenzhen VVI Electronic Limited; Shenzhen Yright Technology Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen Kinsen Technology Co., Limited; Shenzhen Showerstar Industrial Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen Lamye Technology Co., Ltd.; Jiangmen Besnovo Electronics Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen Belking Electronic Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen CEX Electronic Co., Limited, all of Guangdong, China. Id. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations (``OUII'') also was named as a party in the investigation. On August 22, 2017, the Commission found the following thirteen respondents in default: Agomax Group Ltd.; Yiwu Wentou Import & Export Co., Ltd.; Hangzhou Hangkai Technology Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen Enruize Technology Co., Ltd.; Guangzhou Xi Xun Electronics Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen VVI Electronic Limited; Shenzhen Yright Technology Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen Kinsen Technology Co., Limited; Shenzhen Showerstar Industrial Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen Lamye Technology Co., Ltd.; Jiangmen Besnovo Electronics Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen Belking Electronic Co., Ltd.; and Shenzhen CEX Electronic Co., Limited (collectively, ``defaulting respondents''). Notice (Aug. 22, 2017) (determining not to review Order No. 9 (Aug. 4, 2017)). On September 18, 2017, the Commission terminated Shenzhen Chuanghui Industry Co., Ltd. based on withdrawal of the complaint as to that respondent. Notice (Sept. 18, 2017) (determining not to review Order No. 10 (Aug. 28, 2017)). On August 8, 2017, PopSockets filed a motion for summary determination that (1) the defaulting respondents have sold for importation into the United States, imported into the United States, or sold after importation certain collapsible sockets for mobile electronic devices and components thereof that allegedly infringe certain claims of the '031 patent in violation of section 337; (2) the accused products infringe the asserted claims of the '031 patent; and (3) a domestic industry with respect to the '031 patent exists. The motion also requested a recommendation for entry of a general exclusion order and a bonding requirement pending Presidential review. On August 31, 2017, OUII filed a response supporting the motion in substantial part and supporting the requested remedy of a general exclusion order. On February 1, 2018, the administrative law judge (``ALJ'') issued an initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 11), granting PopSockets' motion for summary determination of a section 337 violation. The ID found that the defaulting respondents' accused products infringe one or more of claims 9-12 of the '031 patent, but found no infringement of claims 16 and 17 of the '031 patent. The ID found that the defaulting respondents' accused products have been imported into the United States and that a domestic [[Page 12813]] industry exists in the United States with respect to the '031 patent. The ALJ also issued a Recommended Determination on Remedy and Bonding, recommending that, if the Commission finds a section 337 violation, the Commission issue a general exclusion order and impose a bond of 100 percent during the period of Presidential review. No petitions for review of the ID were filed. Having examined the record of this investigation, including the ID, the Commission has determined to review in part the ALJ's determination of a section 337 violation. Specifically, the Commission has determined to review (1) the ID's findings on the technical prong of the domestic industry requirement to correct a typographical error, namely, to modify a citation to ``Mem. Ex. 2 (Kemnitzer Decl.) at ] 77 (Infringement Analysis and Chart)'' at page 107 of the ID to ``Mem. Ex. 2 (Kemnitzer Decl.) at ] 61 (Analysis and Chart)'' and (2) the ID's findings on the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement. The Commission has determined not to review the remaining issues decided in the ID. In connection with its review, the Commission requests responses to the following questions. The parties are requested to brief their positions with reference to the applicable law and the record. 1. Please describe the nature and significance of PopSockets' alleged domestic industry investments, i.e., in the context of PopSockets' operations, marketplace, or industry, and whether PopSockets' activities have a direct bearing on the practice of the '031 patent. As part of your response, please describe in detail PopSockets' activities in engineering, research, development, operations, marketing, sales, service, and assembly and what amount or portion of the total alleged investment under each of 19 U.S.C. 1337(a)(3)(A), (B), and (C) is allocable to each activity. 2. Please provide a basis for crediting any investments that occurred after the filing date of the complaint towards the domestic industry requirement. In connection with the final disposition of this investigation, the Commission may (1) issue an order that could result in the exclusion of the subject articles from entry into the United States, and/or (2) issue a cease and desist order that could result in the respondent being required to cease and desist from engaging in unfair acts in the importation and sale of such articles. Accordingly, the Commission is interested in receiving written submissions that address the form of remedy, if any, that should be ordered. If a party seeks exclusion of an article from entry into the United States for purposes other than entry for consumption, the party should so indicate and provide information establishing that activities involving other types of entry either are adversely affecting it or likely to do so. For background, see Certain Devices for Connecting Computers via Telephone Lines, Inv. No. 337-TA-360, USITC Pub. No. 2843 (Dec. 1994), Comm'n Opinion. In particular, the written submissions should address any request for a cease and desist order in the context of recent Commission opinions, including those in Certain Arrowheads with Deploying Blades and Components Thereof and Packaging Therefor, Inv. No. 337-TA-977, Comm'n Op. (Apr. 28, 2017) and Certain Electric Skin Care Devices, Brushes and Chargers Therefor, and Kits Containing the Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-959, Comm'n Op. (Feb. 13, 2017). Specifically, if Complainant seeks a cease and desist order against a defaulting respondent, the written submissions should respond to the following requests: 1. Please identify with citations to the record any information regarding commercially significant inventory in the United States as to each respondent against whom a cease and desist order is sought. If Complainant also relies on other significant domestic operations that could undercut the remedy provided by an exclusion order, please identify with citations to the record such information as to each respondent against whom a cease and desist order is sought. 2. In relation to the infringing products, please identify any information in the record, including allegations in the pleadings, that addresses the existence of any domestic inventory, any domestic operations, or any sales-related activity directed at the United States for each respondent against whom a cease and desist order is sought. If the Commission contemplates some form of remedy, it must consider the effects of that remedy upon the public interest. The factors the Commission will consider include the effect that an exclusion order and/or cease and desist order would have on (1) the public health and welfare, (2) competitive conditions in the U.S. economy, (3) U.S. production of articles that are like or directly competitive with those that are subject to investigation, and (4) U.S. consumers. The Commission is therefore interested in receiving written submissions that address the aforementioned public interest factors in the context of this investigation. If the Commission orders some form of remedy, the U.S. Trade Representative, as delegated by the President, has 60 days to approve or disapprove the Commission's action. See Presidential Memorandum of July 21, 2005, 70 FR 43251 (July 26, 2005). During this period, the subject articles would be entitled to enter the United States under bond, in an amount determined by the Commission and prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury. The Commission is therefore interested in receiving submissions concerning the amount of the bond that should be imposed if a remedy is ordered. Written Submissions: The parties to the investigation are requested to file written submissions on all of the issues identified in this notice. Parties to the investigation, interested government agencies, and any other interested parties are encouraged to file written submissions on the issues of remedy, the public interest, and bonding. Such submissions should address the recommended determination by the ALJ on remedy and bonding. Complainant is also requested to submit proposed remedial orders for the Commission's consideration. Complainant is also requested to state the date that the asserted patents expire and the HTSUS numbers under which the accused products are imported, and provide identification information for all known importers of the subject articles. Initial written submissions and proposed remedial orders must be filed no later than close of business on Monday, April 2, 2018. Reply submissions must be filed no later than the close of business on Monday, April 9, 2018. No further submissions on these issues will be permitted unless otherwise ordered by the Commission. Persons filing written submissions must file the original document electronically on or before the deadlines stated above and submit 8 true paper copies to the Office of the Secretary by noon the next day pursuant to section 210.4(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to the investigation number (Inv. No. 337-TA-1056) in a prominent place on the cover page and/or the first page. (See Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/secretary/documents/handbook_on_filing_procedures.pdf). Persons with questions regarding filing should contact the Secretary at (202) 205-2000. Any person desiring to submit a document to the Commission in confidence must request confidential [[Page 12814]] treatment. All such requests should be directed to the Secretary to the Commission and must include a full statement of the reasons why the Commission should grant such treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents for which confidential treatment by the Commission is properly sought will be treated accordingly. All information, including confidential business information and documents for which confidential treatment is properly sought, submitted to the Commission for purposes of this investigation may be disclosed to and used: (i) By the Commission, its employees and Offices, and contract personnel (a) for developing or maintaining the records of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in internal investigations, audits, reviews, and evaluations relating to the programs, personnel, and operations of the Commission including under 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. government employees and contract personnel,\1\ solely for cybersecurity purposes. All nonconfidential written submissions will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Secretary and on EDIS. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ All contract personnel will sign appropriate nondisclosure agreements. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: March 19, 2018. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2018-05906 Filed 3-22-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
![12812 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 57 / Friday, March 23, 2018 / Notices
submissions must include the that the defaulting respondents have Jiangmen Besnovo Electronics Co., Ltd.;
commenter’s name and street address. violated section 337 in the above- Shenzhen Belking Electronic Co., Ltd.;
Comments, including the names and captioned investigation. The Shenzhen CEX Electronic Co., Limited,
addresses of the commenter, will be Commission requests certain briefing all of Guangdong, China. Id. The Office
available for public inspection at the from the parties on the issues under of Unfair Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’)
locations listed above during normal review, as indicated in this notice. The also was named as a party in the
business hours (7:45 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Commission also requests briefing from investigation.
Mountain Daylight Time), Monday the parties and interested persons on the On August 22, 2017, the Commission
through Friday, except Federal holidays. issues of remedy, the public interest, found the following thirteen
Comments on the Draft EIS may be and bonding. respondents in default: Agomax Group
submitted in writing to the BLM at any FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ltd.; Yiwu Wentou Import & Export Co.,
public comment meeting or through one Lucy Grace D. Noyola, Office of the Ltd.; Hangzhou Hangkai Technology
of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES General Counsel, U.S. International Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen Enruize Technology
section. The BLM requests that Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Co., Ltd.; Guangzhou Xi Xun Electronics
comments be structured so they are Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202– Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen VVI Electronic
substantive and contain sufficient detail 205–3438. Copies of non-confidential Limited; Shenzhen Yright Technology
to allow the BLM to address them in the documents filed in connection with this Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen Kinsen Technology
Final EIS. All comments must include a investigation are or will be available for Co., Limited; Shenzhen Showerstar
legible full name and address on the inspection during official business Industrial Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen Lamye
envelope, letter, fax, postcard, or email. hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Technology Co., Ltd.; Jiangmen Besnovo
Copies of the Draft EIS have been sent Office of the Secretary, U.S. Electronics Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen Belking
to affected Federal, State, and local International Trade Commission, 500 E Electronic Co., Ltd.; and Shenzhen CEX
governments; public libraries in the Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, Electronic Co., Limited (collectively,
Project area; and interested parties that telephone 202–205–2000. General ‘‘defaulting respondents’’). Notice (Aug.
previously requested a copy. information concerning the Commission 22, 2017) (determining not to review
Before including your address, phone may also be obtained by accessing its Order No. 9 (Aug. 4, 2017)).
number, email address, or any other On September 18, 2017, the
internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
personal identifying information in your Commission terminated Shenzhen
The public record for this investigation
comment, you should be aware that Chuanghui Industry Co., Ltd. based on
may be viewed on the Commission’s
your entire comment—including your withdrawal of the complaint as to that
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
personal identifying information—may respondent. Notice (Sept. 18, 2017)
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
(determining not to review Order No. 10
be made publicly available at any time. persons are advised that information on
(Aug. 28, 2017)).
While you may request in your this matter can be obtained by On August 8, 2017, PopSockets filed
comment that your personal identifying contacting the Commission’s TDD a motion for summary determination
information be withheld from public terminal on 202–205–1810. that (1) the defaulting respondents have
review, we cannot guarantee that we SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The sold for importation into the United
will be able to do so. Commission instituted this investigation States, imported into the United States,
Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7. on May 15, 2017, based on a complaint or sold after importation certain
filed on behalf of PopSockets LLC of collapsible sockets for mobile electronic
Mary Jo Rugwell, Boulder, Colorado (‘‘PopSockets’’ or devices and components thereof that
State Director. ‘‘Complainant’’). 82 FR 22348–49 (May allegedly infringe certain claims of the
[FR Doc. 2018–05858 Filed 3–22–18; 8:45 am] 15, 2017). The complaint alleges ’031 patent in violation of section 337;
BILLING CODE 4310–22–P violations of section 337 of the Tariff (2) the accused products infringe the
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 asserted claims of the ’031 patent; and
based upon the importation into the (3) a domestic industry with respect to
INTERNATIONAL TRADE United States, the sale for importation, the ’031 patent exists. The motion also
COMMISSION and the sale within the United States requested a recommendation for entry of
after importation of certain collapsible a general exclusion order and a bonding
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1056] sockets for mobile electronic devices requirement pending Presidential
and components thereof by reason of review. On August 31, 2017, OUII filed
Certain Collapsible Sockets for Mobile
infringement of U.S. Patent No. a response supporting the motion in
Electronic Devices and Components
8,560,031 (‘‘the ’031 patent’’). Id. The substantial part and supporting the
Thereof; Commission Determination
notice of investigation named as requested remedy of a general exclusion
To Review an Initial Determination in
respondents Agomax Group Ltd. of order.
Part; Schedule for Filing Written
Kowloon, Hong Kong; Hangzhou On February 1, 2018, the
Submissions on the Issues Under
Hangkai Technology Co., Ltd. of administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) issued
Review and on Remedy, the Public
Zhejiang, China; Yiwu Wentou Import & an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order
Interest, and Bonding
Export Co., Ltd. of Zhejiang, China; No. 11), granting PopSockets’ motion for
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Shenzhen Enruize Technology Co., Ltd. summary determination of a section 337
Commission. of Shenzhen, China; and Guangzhou Xi violation. The ID found that the
ACTION: Notice. Xun Electronics Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen defaulting respondents’ accused
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES
Chuanghui Industry Co., Ltd. of products infringe one or more of claims
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that Guangdong, China; Shenzhen VVI 9–12 of the ’031 patent, but found no
the U.S. International Trade Electronic Limited; Shenzhen Yright infringement of claims 16 and 17 of the
Commission has determined to review- Technology Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen Kinsen ’031 patent. The ID found that the
in-part the presiding administrative law Technology Co., Limited; Shenzhen defaulting respondents’ accused
judge’s initial determination (Order No. Showerstar Industrial Co., Ltd.; products have been imported into the
11) granting summary determination Shenzhen Lamye Technology Co., Ltd.; United States and that a domestic
VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:54 Mar 22, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00099 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM 23MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_12869/page/1.svg)
![12814 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 57 / Friday, March 23, 2018 / Notices
treatment. All such requests should be injury within a reasonably foreseeable subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
directed to the Secretary to the time. The Commission has determined 207).
Commission and must include a full to exercise its authority to extend the Limited disclosure of business
statement of the reasons why the review period by up to 90 days. proprietary information (BPI) under an
Commission should grant such DATES: March 19, 2018. administrative protective order (APO)
treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
and BPI service list.—Pursuant to
for which confidential treatment by the Kristina Lara ((202) 205–3386), Office of section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s
Commission is properly sought will be Investigations, U.S. International Trade rules, the Secretary will make BPI
treated accordingly. All information, Commission, 500 E Street SW, gathered in these reviews available to
including confidential business Washington, DC 20436. Hearing- authorized applicants under the APO
information and documents for which impaired persons can obtain issued in the reviews, provided that the
confidential treatment is properly information on this matter by contacting application is made by 45 days after
sought, submitted to the Commission for publication of this notice. Authorized
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
purposes of this investigation may be applicants must represent interested
205–1810. Persons with mobility
disclosed to and used: (i) By the parties, as defined by 19 U.S.C. 1677(9),
impairments who will need special
Commission, its employees and Offices, who are parties to the reviews. A party
assistance in gaining access to the
and contract personnel (a) for granted access to BPI following
Commission should contact the Office
developing or maintaining the records publication of the Commission’s notice
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in of institution of the reviews need not
General information concerning the
internal investigations, audits, reviews, reapply for such access. A separate
Commission may also be obtained by
and evaluations relating to the service list will be maintained by the
accessing its internet server (https://
programs, personnel, and operations of Secretary for those parties authorized to
www.usitc.gov). The public record for receive BPI under the APO.
the Commission including under 5
these reviews may be viewed on the Staff report.—The prehearing staff
U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S.
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) report in the reviews will be placed in
government employees and contract
at https://edis.usitc.gov. the nonpublic record on June 21, 2018,
personnel,1 solely for cybersecurity
purposes. All nonconfidential written SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: and a public version will be issued
submissions will be available for public Background.—On October 6, 2017, thereafter, pursuant to section 207.64 of
inspection at the Office of the Secretary the Commission determined that the Commission’s rules.
and on EDIS. responses to its notice of institution of Hearing.—The Commission will hold
The authority for the Commission’s the subject five-year reviews were such a hearing in connection with the
determination is contained in section that full reviews should proceed (82 FR reviews beginning at 9:30 a.m. on
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 48527, October 18, 2017); accordingly, Thursday, July 12, 2018, at the U.S.
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part full reviews are being scheduled International Trade Commission
210 of the Commission’s Rules of pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Building. Requests to appear at the
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)). hearing should be filed in writing with
210). A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Secretary to the Commission on or
the Commission’s statement on before July 3, 2018. A nonparty who has
By order of the Commission.
adequacy, and any individual testimony that may aid the
Issued: March 19, 2018. Commissioner’s statements are available Commission’s deliberations may request
Lisa R. Barton, from the Office of the Secretary and at permission to present a short statement
Secretary to the Commission. the Commission’s website. at the hearing. All parties and
[FR Doc. 2018–05906 Filed 3–22–18; 8:45 am] Participation in the reviews and nonparties desiring to appear at the
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P public service list.—Persons, including hearing and make oral presentations
industrial users of the subject should participate in a prehearing
merchandise and, if the merchandise is conference to be held on July 6, 2018,
INTERNATIONAL TRADE sold at the retail level, representative at the U.S. International Trade
COMMISSION consumer organizations, wishing to Commission Building, if deemed
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–678–679 and participate in these reviews as parties necessary. Oral testimony and written
681–682 (Fourth Review)] must file an entry of appearance with materials to be submitted at the public
the Secretary to the Commission, as hearing are governed by sections
Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil, India, provided in section 201.11 of the 201.6(b)(2), 201.13(f), 207.24, and
Japan, and Spain; Scheduling of Full Commission’s rules, by 45 days after 207.66 of the Commission’s rules.
Five-Year Reviews publication of this notice. A party that Parties must submit any request to
AGENCY: United States International filed a notice of appearance following present a portion of their hearing
Trade Commission. publication of the Commission’s notice testimony in camera no later than 7
of institution of the reviews need not business days prior to the date of the
ACTION: Notice.
file an additional notice of appearance. hearing.
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives The Secretary will maintain a public Written submissions.—Each party to
notice of the scheduling of full reviews service list containing the names and the reviews may submit a prehearing
pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the addresses of all persons, or their brief to the Commission. Prehearing
Act’’) to determine whether revocation representatives, who are parties to the briefs must conform with the provisions
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES
of the antidumping duty orders on reviews. of section 207.65 of the Commission’s
stainless steel bar from Brazil, India, For further information concerning rules; the deadline for filing is July 2,
Japan, and Spain would be likely to lead the conduct of these reviews and rules 2018. Parties may also file written
to continuation or recurrence of material of general application, consult the testimony in connection with their
Commission’s Rules of Practice and presentation at the hearing, as provided
1 All contract personnel will sign appropriate Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B in section 207.24 of the Commission’s
nondisclosure agreements. (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, rules, and posthearing briefs, which
VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:54 Mar 22, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00101 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23MRN1.SGM 23MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_12869/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-11-01 08:53:47
Document Modified: 2018-11-01 08:53:47
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice. | |
| Contact | Lucy Grace D. Noyola, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-3438. Copies of non- confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205- 1810. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 12812 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR