83 FR 12933 - Request for Comments Concerning Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) Which May Be a Barrier to the Safe Testing and Deployment of Automated Driving Systems-Equipped Commercial Motor Vehicles on Public Roads

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 58 (March 26, 2018)

Page Range		12933-12937
FR Document		2018-05788

FMCSA requests public comments on existing Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) that may need to be updated, modified, or eliminated to facilitate the safe introduction of automated driving systems (ADS) equipped commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) onto our Nation's roadways. To assist in this undertaking, FMCSA commissioned the U.S. Department of Transportation's John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (Volpe) to conduct a preliminary review of the FMCSRs to identify regulations that may relate to the development and safe introduction of ADS. The Agency requests comments on this report, including whether any of FMCSA's current safety regulations may hinder the testing and safe integration of ADS-equipped CMVs. Further, FMCSA requests comment on certain specific regulatory requirements that are likely to be affected by an increased integration of ADS-equipped CMVs. However, the Agency is not seeking comments on its financial responsibility requirements because they are not directly related to CMV technologies and because future insurance requirements will depend in part on the evolution of State tort law with respect to liability for the operation of ADS-equipped vehicles. In addition, to support FMCSA's effort to understand future impacts on the FMCSR's, FMCSA requests information, including from companies engaged in the design, development, testing, and integration of ADS-equipped CMVs into the fleet. Specifically, the Agency requests information about: The scenarios and environments where entities expect that ADS will soon be tested and integrated into CMVs operating on public roads or in interstate commerce; the operational design domains (ODD) in which these systems are being operated or would be tested and eventually deployed; and, measures they believe are required to ensure the protection of any proprietary or confidential business information they intend to share with the Agency.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 58 (Monday, March 26, 2018)

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 58 (Monday, March 26, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 12933-12937]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-05788]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

49 CFR Chapter III, Subchapter B

[Docket No. FMCSA-2018-0037]


Request for Comments Concerning Federal Motor Carrier Safety 
Regulations (FMCSRs) Which May Be a Barrier to the Safe Testing and 
Deployment of Automated Driving Systems-Equipped Commercial Motor 
Vehicles on Public Roads

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FMCSA requests public comments on existing Federal Motor 
Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) that may need to be updated, 
modified, or eliminated to facilitate the safe introduction of 
automated driving systems (ADS) equipped commercial motor vehicles 
(CMVs) onto our Nation's roadways. To assist in this undertaking, FMCSA 
commissioned the U.S. Department of Transportation's John A. Volpe 
National Transportation Systems Center (Volpe) to conduct a preliminary 
review of the FMCSRs to identify regulations that may relate to the 
development and safe introduction of ADS. The Agency requests comments 
on this report, including whether any of FMCSA's current safety 
regulations may hinder the testing and safe integration of ADS-equipped 
CMVs. Further, FMCSA requests comment on certain specific regulatory 
requirements that are likely to be affected by an increased integration 
of ADS-equipped CMVs. However, the Agency is not seeking comments on 
its financial responsibility requirements because they are not directly 
related to CMV technologies and because future insurance requirements 
will depend in part on the evolution of State tort law with respect to 
liability for the operation of ADS-equipped vehicles. In addition, to 
support FMCSA's effort to understand future impacts on the FMCSR's, 
FMCSA requests information, including from companies engaged in the 
design, development, testing, and integration of ADS-equipped CMVs into 
the fleet. Specifically, the Agency requests information about: The 
scenarios and environments where entities expect that ADS will soon be 
tested and integrated into CMVs operating on public roads or in 
interstate commerce; the operational design domains (ODD) in which 
these systems are being operated or would be tested and eventually 
deployed; and,

[[Page 12934]]

measures they believe are required to ensure the protection of any 
proprietary or confidential business information they intend to share 
with the Agency.

DATES: Public Comments: Comments on this notice must be received on or 
before May 10, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Docket Number FMCSA-
2018-0037 using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of 
Transportation, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 
20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building, Ground Floor, 
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. 
and 5 p.m. E.T., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: 1-202-493-2251.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Michael Huntley, Division Chief, 
Vehicle and Roadside Operations Division, Office of Carrier, Driver, 
and Vehicle Safety, MC-PSV, (202) 366-9209, [email protected], 
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, 
Washington, DC 20590-0001.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this 
notice (FMCSA-2018-0037), indicate the specific section of this 
document and the Volpe report to which each comment applies, provide a 
reason for each suggestion or recommendation, and identify the source 
of any data informing your comment. You may submit your comments and 
material online or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but please use only 
one of these means. FMCSA recommends that you include your name and 
mailing address, an email address, or a phone number in the body of 
your document so that FMCSA can contact you if there are questions 
regarding your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov, 
put the docket number, FMCSA-2018-0037, in the keyword box, and click 
``Search.'' When the new screen appears, click on the ``Comment Now!'' 
button and type your comment into the text box on the following screen. 
Choose whether you are submitting your comment as an individual or on 
behalf of a third party and then submit.
    If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them 
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for 
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would 
like to know that they reached the facility, please enclose a stamped, 
self-addressed postcard or envelope.

Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as any documents mentioned in this 
preamble as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov. Insert the docket number, FMCSA-2018-0037, in the 
keyword box, and click ``Search.'' Next, click the ``Open Docket 
Folder'' button and choose the document to review. If you do not have 
access to the internet, you may view the docket by visiting the Docket 
Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the West 
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., E.T., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Privacy Act

    The Department of Transportation (DOT) solicits comments from the 
public to better inform its decision-making processes. DOT posts these 
comments, without edit, including any personal information the 
commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the system 
of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at 
www.dot.gov/privacy.

I. Background

    On September 12, 2017, the Department published the Automated 
Driving Systems (ADS): A Vision for Safety 2.0. (Publication No. DOT HS 
812 442) (the Voluntary Guidance). The Voluntary Guidance offers a path 
forward for the safe integration of automated vehicles by:
     Encouraging new entrants and ideas that deliver safer 
vehicles;
     Making the Departmental regulatory processes more nimble 
to help match the pace of private sector innovation; and,
     Supporting industry innovation and encouraging open 
communication with the public and with stakeholders.
    The Voluntary Guidance is rooted in the Department's view that ADS-
equipped vehicles hold enormous potential benefits for safety, 
mobility, and the efficiency of our transportation system. The primary 
focus of the Voluntary Guidance is on levels of ADS that can take full 
control of the driving tasks in at least some circumstances. Portions 
of the Voluntary Guidance also apply to lower levels of automation, 
including some of the driver assistance systems already being deployed 
by automakers today. The full document can be found at: https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.dot.gov/files/documents/13069a-ads2.0_090617_v9a_tag.pdf.
    The Voluntary Guidance adopts the SAE International (SAE) J3016 
standard's definitions for levels of automation. The SAE definitions 
divide vehicles into levels based on ``who does what, when.'' 
Generally:
     SAE Level 0, No Driving Automation; the driver performs 
all driving tasks.
     SAE Level 1, Driver Assistance; the vehicle is controlled 
by the driver, but some driving assist features may be included in the 
vehicle design.
     SAE Level 2, Partial Driving Automation; the vehicle has 
combined automated functions, like acceleration and steering, but the 
driver must remain engaged with the driving task and monitor the 
environment at all times.
     SAE Level 3, Conditional Driving Automation; the driver is 
a necessity, but is not required to monitor the environment. The driver 
must be ready to take control of the vehicle at all times with notice.
     SAE Level 4, High Driving Automation; the vehicle is 
capable of performing all driving functions under certain conditions. 
The driver may have the option to control the vehicle.
     SAE Level 5, Full Driving Automation: the vehicle is 
capable of performing all driving functions under all conditions.
    Using the SAE levels described above, the Department draws a 
distinction between Levels 0-2 and 3-5 based on whether the human 
driver or the automated system is primarily responsible for monitoring 
the driving environment. For the purposes of this Federal Register 
notice, the Agency's primary focus is SAE Levels 3-5 ADS.
    FMCSA encourages the development of these advanced safety 
technologies for use on CMVs, and at the same time, recognizes the need 
to work with the States to ensure that, from an operations standpoint, 
all testing and use of these advanced safety systems is conducted in a 
manner that ensures the safe operation of ADS-equipped commercial 
vehicles.
    FMCSA is responsible for the safety oversight of motor carriers 
operating CMVs in interstate commerce, the drivers of CMVs, and the 
vehicles. The Agency works with its State partners to deliver programs 
intended to prevent CMV crashes, and the associated injuries and 
fatalities.
    The FMCSRs provide rules to ensure the safe operation of CMVs, as 
defined

[[Page 12935]]

in 49 CFR 390.5, which includes vehicles with a gross vehicle weight/
gross combination weight or gross vehicle weight rating/gross 
combination weight rating, whichever is greater, of 10,001 pounds or 
more; passenger-carrying vehicles designed or used to transport 9 to 15 
passengers for direct compensation; passenger-carrying vehicles 
designed or used to transport 16 or more passengers; and any size 
vehicle transporting hazardous materials in a quantity requiring 
placards.
    On April 24, 2017, FMCSA held a public listening session to solicit 
information on issues relating to the design, development, testing, and 
integration of ADS-equipped commercial motor vehicles (82 FR 18096, 
April 17, 2017). The listening session provided interested parties an 
opportunity to share their views and any data or analysis on this topic 
with Agency representatives. The Agency also invited interested parties 
to submit written comments by July 17, 2017. A full transcript of the 
listening session and all written comments is available in public 
docket, FMCSA-2017-0114, at www.regulations.gov.

II. Request for Public Comments: The Applications of the FMCSRs to ADS-
Equipped CMVs

    In addition to the public listening session discussed above, FMCSA 
commissioned Volpe to conduct a preliminary review of the FMCSRs to 
identify regulations that relate to the development and safe 
introduction of automated driving systems. FMCSA subsequently received 
from Volpe its final report, ``Review of the Federal Motor Carrier 
Safety Regulations for Automated Commercial Vehicles: Preliminary 
Assessment of Interpretation and Enforcement Challenges, Questions, and 
Gaps,'' report number MCSA-RRT-17-013, August 2017. A copy of the 
report is included in the docket referenced at the beginning of this 
notice.
    Volpe found several provisions in the FMCSRs that might present 
challenges for automated CMVs that continue to require a human driver. 
Additionally, Volpe indicated that automated CMVs either requiring an 
onboard (non-driving) human technician or not requiring an onboard 
human at all may face compliance challenges. Volpe noted, however, that 
the nature and extent of these challenges will depend on how key terms 
and applicability statements are interpreted.
    Notwithstanding the findings of the Volpe analysis, the Policy 
released on September 12, 2017, indicated (see page 2 of the 
publication) that FMCSA believes its regulations require that ``a 
trained commercial driver must be behind the wheel at all times, 
regardless of any automated driving technologies available on the CMV, 
unless a petition for a waiver or exemption has been granted.'' In 
light of the comments the Agency received in response to its April 17, 
2017, request for public comments and the remarks of those in 
attendance at the April 24, 2017, public listening session, the Agency 
is reconsidering its views on this matter. The absence of specific 
regulatory text requiring a driver be behind the wheel may afford the 
Agency the flexibility to allow, under existing regulations, ADS to 
perform the driver's functions in the operational design domain in 
which the system would be relied upon, without the presence of a 
trained commercial driver in the driver's seat.
    FMCSA notes that in the event regulatory relief is necessary to 
allow the operation of a commercial motor vehicle without a person in 
the driver's seat, the Agency has authority to grant waivers for up to 
three months, grant exemptions for up to five years (with the 
possibility of renewals of the exemptions), or allow pilot programs for 
up to three years, provided certain conditions are satisfied [see 49 
CFR part 381].
    To that end, the Agency seeks information concerning the extent to 
which the public, including industry, safety advocates, the motoring 
public, and those engaged in the design, development, testing, and 
integration of ADS for CMVs believe any of FMCSA's current safety 
regulations may hinder the testing and safe deployment of ADS-equipped 
CMVs, including, but not limited to, the regulations preliminarily 
identified by Volpe. In particular, the agency is interested in 
comments concerning how different interpretations of the applicability 
of FMCSRs to ADS-equipped CMVs could represent a barrier, e.g., whether 
the FMCSRs, under certain conditions, could be read to require, or not 
require, the presence of a trained commercial driver in the driver's 
seat. To the extent commenters do identify unnecessary barriers, how 
could FMCSA use its available regulatory relief mechanism to 
appropriately remove or reduce those barriers?
    In addition to the issues in the Volpe Report, the agency also 
requests comment on how ADS-equipped CMVs could interact with certain 
specific regulations.

Inspection, Repair, and Maintenance

    The FMCSRs require all CMVs to be systematically inspected, 
repaired, and maintained. All parts must be in safe and proper 
operating condition at all times. With limited exceptions, motor 
carriers are prohibited from operating a CMV unless there is proof that 
it has passed an annual inspection.
    How should motor carriers ensure the proper functioning of ADS 
prior to operating in an automated mode?
    Should the Agency consider minimum requirements for motor carrier 
personnel responsible for maintaining the equipment used to achieve 
certain levels of automated operations (for example, a requirement that 
technicians be trained by the ADS developers, etc.)?
    What Information Technology (IT) security/safety assurances can be 
provided by maintenance personnel and CMV drivers/operators that the 
ADS systems are functioning properly?
    For State representatives with experience inspecting traditional 
CMVs, what types of malfunctions or damage on an ADS-equipped CMV 
should be considered an imminent hazard? Do you have any additional 
comments regarding inspection, repair, and maintenance?

Roadside and Annual Inspections

    FMCSA and its State partners conduct roadside inspections of CMVs 
to identify and remove from service unsafe drivers and vehicles. The 
inspection criteria represent enforcement tolerances, which are 
thresholds for determining whether the level of noncompliance with the 
applicable safety regulations is severe enough to warrant placing the 
vehicle or driver out-of-service.
    How could an enforcement official identify CMVs capable of various 
levels of automated operation? For example, should CMVs with ADS be 
visibly marked to indicate the level of automated operation they are 
designed to achieve, or would making these vehicles so easily 
identifiable cause other road users to interact unfavorably with CMVs 
with ADS?
    Do you have any additional comments regarding roadside and annual 
inspections?

Distracted Driving (Prohibition Against Texting and Using Handheld 
Wireless Phones) and Driver Monitoring

    This section applies to situations involving a Level 3 human-
monitored ADS. Current regulations prohibit individuals from texting 
and using hand-held wireless phones while driving CMVs in interstate 
commerce.

[[Page 12936]]

    What changes, if any, should be made to the distracted driving 
regulations for human drivers of CMVs with ADS while in automated mode? 
For example, should a human driver in a CMV with ADS be allowed to use 
a hand-held wireless phone while the ADS is in complete control of the 
vehicle?
    Should driver fatigue monitoring be required, and if so, what 
method(s) should be used to conduct such monitoring? For example, the 
Trucking Fatigue Meter [See https://pulsarinformatics.com/products/trucking] samples data throughout the day and alerts fleet managers 
once a human driver exceeds a company-determined fatigue threshold.
    Additionally, should these systems be required to provide 
``alertness assistance'' to human drivers? For example, should these 
systems be required to periodically request input from human drivers, 
or should they be required to request input from human drivers only 
when the driver appears to be losing focus or when the ADS in control 
of the vehicle is confronted with situations outside its parameters?
    What level of human driver inattentiveness (or how long a period of 
inattentiveness) should be allowed in a vehicle controlled by an ADS 
before the vehicle is required to enter its minimal risk condition? How 
long after entering the minimal risk condition must a human driver wait 
to re-engage an ADS (e.g., a minimum 30-minute break may provide the 
driver an opportunity to rest)? What should the requirements be for re-
engaging the CMV with ADS in an automated mode in this scenario?

Medical Qualifications

    FMCSA's regulations include physical qualification standards for 
humans driving CMVs to ensure that they are medically qualified to do 
so. As technology advances, humans may be required only to monitor the 
operation of CMVs with ADS on public roadways, or they may not be 
required at all. Thus, as technology develops, changes to the physical 
qualification rules will be required, and some medical conditions may 
become inapplicable.
    What medical conditions currently precluding issuance of a medical 
card could become inapplicable as ADS technology develops?
    What medical conditions currently precluding issuance of a medical 
card should NOT be considered disqualifying for a human driver who is 
simply monitoring a CMV with ADS?

Hours of Service for Drivers

    FMCSA's regulations include requirements intended to reduce the 
risk of driver fatigue and fatigue-related crashes. Generally, the 
rules for truck drivers allow up to 11 hours driving time in the work 
day, following 10 consecutive hours off-duty. And all driving must be 
completed within 14 hours of the beginning of the work day. The rules 
prohibit driving after a driver has accumulated a certain amount of on-
duty time (which includes the time spent driving and time spent 
performing other work) during the work week. Current regulations 
require that all time spent at the operating controls of the CMV be 
recorded as on-duty, driving time. Given the SAE levels of automation 
discussed above, FMCSA seeks public comments on how drivers' hours of 
service should be recorded if the ADS is relied upon to perform some or 
all of the driving tasks.

Commercial Driver's License (CDL) Endorsements

    FMCSA requires all drivers of CMVs to have the knowledge and skills 
necessary to operate a CMV safely. States are required to include 
specific items in the knowledge and skills tests administered to CDL 
applicants. CDL applicants wishing to obtain specific endorsements must 
satisfy additional knowledge and skill test requirements. Existing 
endorsements include: Double/triple trailers, passenger, tank vehicle, 
hazardous materials, and school bus.
    Due to potential variations in ADS technology across various 
providers, FMCSA seeks to ensure that human drivers and operators of 
CMVs with ADS receive training for the specific technologies present in 
the vehicles they operate.
    Should an endorsement be considered for human drivers and operators 
of CMVs with ADS to ensure they (1) understand the capabilities and 
limitations of the advanced technologies, and (2) know when it is 
appropriate to rely on automatic rather than manual operation? If so, 
what types of tests--knowledge, skills, or both--should be required to 
obtain such an endorsement; and should there be separate endorsements 
for different types of ADS?
    If an ADS-equipped CMV is to be deployed without a human driver 
onboard, should the computer system be required to demonstrate 
autonomous capabilities for the same maneuvers included on the CDL 
skills test?

III. Request for Information: Current Testing and Operation of CMVs 
With ADS

Data Sharing

    FMCSA would like to ensure that the Agency is able to receive and 
review data and information from the private sector to understand a 
driver's experience with ADS technologies in real-world settings.
    If you are a developer or tester of ADS technologies, what types of 
data and/or safety measures are you currently collecting--or do you 
plan to collect--during testing? How often is this data collected?
    How can FMCSA ensure that data and/or safety measures collected are 
presented in a comparable format?
    How can FMCSA assess whether a CMV equipped with an ADS is being 
operated as safely as a traditional CMV operating on a public roadway?
    What pieces of information are entities using to evaluate how a 
driver is using an ADS- equipped commercial vehicle?

Testing and Interstate Operations of CMVs With ADS on Public Roadways

    What type of ADS-equipped CMVs are currently being tested? Are they 
Level 4 ADS-equipped vehicles that can only operate on certain 
roadways, Level 4 vehicles with more extensive ODDs, or full Level 5 
vehicles?
    Do vehicles currently being tested have operational limitations to 
ensure safe operations? Examples of operational limitations might 
include time of day, weather conditions, types of roads, specific 
routes within an ODD, maximum allowable operational speed, markings 
showing that the vehicle is capable of highly automated operations, 
etc.
    In moving forward what actions, if any, should FMCSA consider to 
ensure the safe operation of ADS-equipped CMV's in various ODDs?
    How can FMCSA assess whether a CMV with ADS operating within its 
ODD can perform on certain maneuvers, such as emergency brake 
performance, crash avoidance maneuvers, etc.?
    Should FMCSA consider approaching CMVs that carry persons or 
hazardous materials differently than other CMVs?
    For State representatives, would you consider changing certain 
requirements (for example, higher versus lower levels of insurance) for 
an ADS-equipped CMV? If yes, based on what factors; and how would you 
implement such requirements?

Beyond Compliance Program

    On April 23, 2015, FMCSA issued an initial Federal Register notice 
seeking

[[Page 12937]]

comment on the impacts of a possible ``Beyond Compliance Program'' to 
consider a company's voluntary implementation of state-of-the-art best 
practices and technologies when evaluating a carrier's safety (80 FR 
22770).
    The Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act mandated 
that the Agency provide recognition to motor carriers for voluntary use 
of advanced technologies or safety programs (Pub. L. 114-94, 129 Stat. 
1312, Dec. 4, 2012). Per section 5222, FMCSA may authorize qualified 
entities to monitor motor carriers that receive ``Beyond Compliance'' 
recognition (129 Stat. 1540).
    To what extent, if any, should the various levels of automation be 
considered as part of the Beyond Compliance Program?

Regulation of Manufacturing Versus Operation

    The regulation of CMVs is a function shared by the National Highway 
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and FMCSA, with manufacturing 
regulated by NHTSA and operation regulated by FMCSA (and its State 
partners). Does this separation of functions create unique problems, or 
perhaps offer unique solutions, for operators of ADS-equipped CMVs?

Confidentiality of Shared Information

    FMCSA acknowledges that companies may be reluctant to share certain 
proprietary data or information with the Agency, either as part of the 
waiver, exemption, or pilot program application process, or during the 
pendency of a regulatory relief period. The Agency notes that 49 CFR 
389.3 provides protection for ``confidential business information'' 
which includes trade secrets or commercial or financial information 
that is privileged or confidential, as described in 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4). 
Commercial or financial information is considered confidential if it is 
voluntarily submitted to the Agency and constitutes the type of 
information not customarily released to the general public. FMCSA has 
established standards and procedures by which the Agency will solicit, 
receive, and protect confidential information from public disclosure. 
The Agency is seeking information from interested parties on how it 
might further protect non-public information necessary to assess 
whether ADS-equipped CMVs meet performance standards and accurately 
document safety-related events during a waiver, temporary exemption, or 
pilot program.
    What measures would original equipment manufacturers and developers 
expect of FMCSA before sharing confidential business information?
    How might the Agency obtain information sufficient to assess the 
safety performance of CMVs with ADS without collecting confidential 
business information?
    Do you have any additional comments regarding the confidentiality 
of shared information?

    Issued under authority delegated in 49 CFR 1.87 on: March 16, 
2018.
Raymond P. Martinez,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2018-05788 Filed 3-23-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 58 / Monday, March 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules 12933

following paragraphs as additions to Government-wide commercial purchase card DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
paragraph (b) of the basic clause: are considered to be an electronic transaction
(6)(i) The Contractor shall show on the for purposes of this rule, and therefore no Federal Motor Carrier Safety
critical path method (CPM) the total cost of additional electronic invoice submission is Administration
the guarantee period services in accordance required.
with the guarantee period service section(s) (c) Data transmission. A contractor must
of the specifications. This cost shall be priced
49 CFR Chapter III, Subchapter B
ensure that the data transmission method and
out when submitting the CPM cost loaded [Docket No. FMCSA–2018–0037]
network. The cost submitted shall be subject format are through one of the following:
to the approval of the Contracting Officer. (1) VA’s Electronic Invoice Presentment Request for Comments Concerning
The activity on the CPM shall have money and Payment System at the current website Federal Motor Carrier Safety
only and not activity time. address provided in the contract. Regulations (FMCSRs) Which May Be
(ii) The Contractor shall submit with the (2) Any system that conforms to the X12 a Barrier to the Safe Testing and
CPM a guarantee period performance electronic data interchange (EDI) formats Deployment of Automated Driving
program which shall include an itemized established by the Accredited Standards
accounting of the number of work-hours Systems-Equipped Commercial Motor
Center (ASC) and chartered by the American Vehicles on Public Roads
required to perform the guarantee period National Standards Institute (ANSI).
service on each piece of equipment. The (d) Invoice requirements. Invoices shall AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Contractor shall also submit the established
comply with FAR 32.905. Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
salary costs, including employee fringe
benefits, and what the contractor reasonably (e) Exceptions. If, based on one of the ACTION: Request for comments.
expects to pay over the guarantee period, all circumstances below, the Contracting Officer
of which will be subject to the Contracting directs that payment requests be made by SUMMARY: FMCSA requests public
Officer’s approval. mail, the contractor shall submit payment comments on existing Federal Motor
(iii) The cost of the guarantee period requests by mail through the United States Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs)
service shall be prorated on an annual basis Postal Service to the designated agency that may need to be updated, modified,
and paid in equal monthly payments by VA office. Submission of payment requests by or eliminated to facilitate the safe
during the period of guarantee. In the event mail may be required for— introduction of automated driving
the installer does not perform satisfactorily (1) Awards made to foreign vendors for systems (ADS) equipped commercial
during this period, all payments may be work performed outside the United States; motor vehicles (CMVs) onto our
withheld and the Contracting Officer shall Nation’s roadways. To assist in this
(2) Classified contracts or purchases when
inform the contractor of the unsatisfactory undertaking, FMCSA commissioned the
performance, allowing the Contractor 10 days electronic submission and processing of
to correct and comply with the contract. The payment requests could compromise the U.S. Department of Transportation’s
guarantee period service is subject to those safeguarding of classified or privacy John A. Volpe National Transportation
provisions as set forth in the Payments and information; Systems Center (Volpe) to conduct a
Default clauses. (3) Contracts awarded by Contracting preliminary review of the FMCSRs to
Officers in the conduct of emergency identify regulations that may relate to
■ 34. Section 852.232–72 is revised to
operations, such as responses to national the development and safe introduction
read as follows:
emergencies; of ADS. The Agency requests comments
§ 852.232–72 Electronic submission of (4) Solicitations or contracts in which the on this report, including whether any of
payment requests. designated agency office is a VA entity other FMCSA’s current safety regulations may
As prescribed in 832.7001–2, insert than the VA Financial Services Center in hinder the testing and safe integration of
the following clause: Austin, Texas; or ADS-equipped CMVs. Further, FMCSA
(5) Solicitations or contracts in which the requests comment on certain specific
Electronic Submission of Payment Requests VA designated agency office does not have regulatory requirements that are likely
(Date) electronic invoicing capability as described to be affected by an increased
(a) Definitions. As used in this clause— above. integration of ADS-equipped CMVs.
(1) Contract financing payment has the However, the Agency is not seeking
meaning given in FAR 32.001. (End of clause)
(2) Designated agency office means the
comments on its financial responsibility
office designated by the purchase order, § 852.236–82 [Removed and reserved].
requirements because they are not
agreement, or contract to first receive and directly related to CMV technologies
review invoices. This office can be § 852.236–83 [Removed and reserved]. and because future insurance
contractually designated as the receiving requirements will depend in part on the
entity. This office may be different from the ■ 35. Remove and reserve sections evolution of State tort law with respect
office issuing the payment. 852.236–82 and 852.236–83. to liability for the operation of ADS-
(3) Electronic form means an automated equipped vehicles. In addition, to
system transmitting information PART 870—SPECIAL PROCUREMENT
support FMCSA’s effort to understand
electronically according to the accepted CONTROLS
electronic data transmission methods and
future impacts on the FMCSR’s, FMCSA
formats identified in paragraph (c) of this ■ 36. The authority citation for part 870 requests information, including from
clause. Facsimile, email, and scanned is revised to read as follows: companies engaged in the design,
documents are not acceptable electronic development, testing, and integration of
forms for submission of payment requests. Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 41 U.S.C. ADS-equipped CMVs into the fleet.
(4) Invoice payment has the meaning given 1702; and 48 CFR 1.301–1.304. Specifically, the Agency requests
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS

in FAR 32.001. information about: The scenarios and
(5) Payment request means any request for § 870.112 [Removed]
environments where entities expect that
contract financing payment or invoice ADS will soon be tested and integrated
payment submitted by the contractor under § 870.113 [Removed]
this contract.
into CMVs operating on public roads or
■ 37. Remove sections 870. 112 and in interstate commerce; the operational
(b) Electronic payment requests. Except as 870.113.
provided in paragraph (e) of this clause, the design domains (ODD) in which these
contractor shall submit payment requests in [FR Doc. 2018–04002 Filed 3–23–18; 8:45 am] systems are being operated or would be
electronic form. Purchases paid with a BILLING CODE 8320–01–P tested and eventually deployed; and,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:14 Mar 23, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\26MRP1.SGM 26MRP1

12936 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 58 / Monday, March 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules

What changes, if any, should be made risk of driver fatigue and fatigue-related III. Request for Information: Current
to the distracted driving regulations for crashes. Generally, the rules for truck Testing and Operation of CMVs With
human drivers of CMVs with ADS while drivers allow up to 11 hours driving ADS
in automated mode? For example, time in the work day, following 10 Data Sharing
should a human driver in a CMV with consecutive hours off-duty. And all
ADS be allowed to use a hand-held driving must be completed within 14 FMCSA would like to ensure that the
wireless phone while the ADS is in hours of the beginning of the work day. Agency is able to receive and review
complete control of the vehicle? data and information from the private
The rules prohibit driving after a driver
Should driver fatigue monitoring be sector to understand a driver’s
has accumulated a certain amount of on- experience with ADS technologies in
required, and if so, what method(s) duty time (which includes the time
should be used to conduct such real-world settings.
spent driving and time spent performing If you are a developer or tester of ADS
monitoring? For example, the Trucking
other work) during the work week. technologies, what types of data and/or
Fatigue Meter [See https://pulsar
informatics.com/products/trucking] Current regulations require that all time safety measures are you currently
samples data throughout the day and spent at the operating controls of the collecting—or do you plan to collect—
alerts fleet managers once a human CMV be recorded as on-duty, driving during testing? How often is this data
driver exceeds a company-determined time. Given the SAE levels of collected?
fatigue threshold. automation discussed above, FMCSA How can FMCSA ensure that data
Additionally, should these systems be seeks public comments on how drivers’ and/or safety measures collected are
required to provide ‘‘alertness hours of service should be recorded if presented in a comparable format?
assistance’’ to human drivers? For the ADS is relied upon to perform some How can FMCSA assess whether a
example, should these systems be or all of the driving tasks. CMV equipped with an ADS is being
required to periodically request input operated as safely as a traditional CMV
Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) operating on a public roadway?
from human drivers, or should they be
Endorsements What pieces of information are
required to request input from human
entities using to evaluate how a driver
drivers only when the driver appears to FMCSA requires all drivers of CMVs is using an ADS- equipped commercial
be losing focus or when the ADS in to have the knowledge and skills vehicle?
control of the vehicle is confronted with necessary to operate a CMV safely.
situations outside its parameters? Testing and Interstate Operations of
States are required to include specific
What level of human driver CMVs With ADS on Public Roadways
items in the knowledge and skills tests
inattentiveness (or how long a period of What type of ADS-equipped CMVs are
inattentiveness) should be allowed in a administered to CDL applicants. CDL
applicants wishing to obtain specific currently being tested? Are they Level 4
vehicle controlled by an ADS before the ADS-equipped vehicles that can only
vehicle is required to enter its minimal endorsements must satisfy additional
knowledge and skill test requirements. operate on certain roadways, Level 4
risk condition? How long after entering vehicles with more extensive ODDs, or
the minimal risk condition must a Existing endorsements include: Double/
full Level 5 vehicles?
human driver wait to re-engage an ADS triple trailers, passenger, tank vehicle, Do vehicles currently being tested
(e.g., a minimum 30-minute break may hazardous materials, and school bus. have operational limitations to ensure
provide the driver an opportunity to Due to potential variations in ADS safe operations? Examples of
rest)? What should the requirements be technology across various providers, operational limitations might include
for re-engaging the CMV with ADS in an FMCSA seeks to ensure that human time of day, weather conditions, types
automated mode in this scenario? drivers and operators of CMVs with of roads, specific routes within an ODD,
Medical Qualifications ADS receive training for the specific maximum allowable operational speed,
technologies present in the vehicles markings showing that the vehicle is
FMCSA’s regulations include physical capable of highly automated operations,
qualification standards for humans they operate.
etc.
driving CMVs to ensure that they are Should an endorsement be considered In moving forward what actions, if
medically qualified to do so. As for human drivers and operators of any, should FMCSA consider to ensure
technology advances, humans may be CMVs with ADS to ensure they (1) the safe operation of ADS-equipped
required only to monitor the operation understand the capabilities and CMV’s in various ODDs?
of CMVs with ADS on public roadways, limitations of the advanced How can FMCSA assess whether a
or they may not be required at all. Thus, technologies, and (2) know when it is CMV with ADS operating within its
as technology develops, changes to the appropriate to rely on automatic rather ODD can perform on certain maneuvers,
physical qualification rules will be than manual operation? If so, what types such as emergency brake performance,
required, and some medical conditions of tests—knowledge, skills, or both— crash avoidance maneuvers, etc.?
may become inapplicable. should be required to obtain such an Should FMCSA consider approaching
What medical conditions currently endorsement; and should there be CMVs that carry persons or hazardous
precluding issuance of a medical card separate endorsements for different materials differently than other CMVs?
could become inapplicable as ADS For State representatives, would you
types of ADS?
technology develops? consider changing certain requirements
If an ADS-equipped CMV is to be
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS

What medical conditions currently (for example, higher versus lower levels
precluding issuance of a medical card deployed without a human driver of insurance) for an ADS-equipped
should NOT be considered disqualifying onboard, should the computer system be CMV? If yes, based on what factors; and
for a human driver who is simply required to demonstrate autonomous how would you implement such
monitoring a CMV with ADS? capabilities for the same maneuvers requirements?
Hours of Service for Drivers included on the CDL skills test? Beyond Compliance Program
FMCSA’s regulations include On April 23, 2015, FMCSA issued an
requirements intended to reduce the initial Federal Register notice seeking

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:14 Mar 23, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\26MRP1.SGM 26MRP1

$Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 58 / Monday, March 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules 12937 comment on the impacts of a possible by NHTSA and operation regulated by confidential information from public ‘‘Beyond Compliance Program’’ to FMCSA (and its State partners). Does disclosure. The Agency is seeking consider a company’s voluntary this separation of functions create information from interested parties on implementation of state-of-the-art best unique problems, or perhaps offer how it might further protect non-public practices and technologies when unique solutions, for operators of ADS- information necessary to assess whether evaluating a carrier’s safety (80 FR equipped CMVs? ADS-equipped CMVs meet performance 22770). standards and accurately document Confidentiality of Shared Information The Fixing America’s Surface safety-related events during a waiver, Transportation (FAST) Act mandated FMCSA acknowledges that companies temporary exemption, or pilot program. that the Agency provide recognition to may be reluctant to share certain What measures would original motor carriers for voluntary use of proprietary data or information with the equipment manufacturers and advanced technologies or safety Agency, either as part of the waiver, developers expect of FMCSA before programs (Pub. L. 114–94, 129 Stat. exemption, or pilot program application sharing confidential business 1312, Dec. 4, 2012). Per section 5222, process, or during the pendency of a information? FMCSA may authorize qualified entities regulatory relief period. The Agency How might the Agency obtain to monitor motor carriers that receive notes that 49 CFR 389.3 provides information sufficient to assess the ‘‘Beyond Compliance’’ recognition (129 protection for ‘‘confidential business safety performance of CMVs with ADS Stat. 1540). information’’ which includes trade without collecting confidential business To what extent, if any, should the secrets or commercial or financial information? various levels of automation be information that is privileged or Do you have any additional comments considered as part of the Beyond confidential, as described in 5 U.S.C. regarding the confidentiality of shared Compliance Program? 552(b)(4). Commercial or financial information? information is considered confidential if Regulation of Manufacturing Versus it is voluntarily submitted to the Agency Issued under authority delegated in 49 CFR Operation and constitutes the type of information 1.87 on: March 16, 2018. The regulation of CMVs is a function not customarily released to the general Raymond P. Martinez, shared by the National Highway Traffic public. FMCSA has established Administrator. Safety Administration (NHTSA) and standards and procedures by which the [FR Doc. 2018–05788 Filed 3–23–18; 8:45 am] FMCSA, with manufacturing regulated Agency will solicit, receive, and protect BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:14 Mar 23, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\26MRP1.SGM 26MRP1$

Document Created: 2018-03-24 01:00:06
Document Modified: 2018-03-24 01:00:06

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Request for comments.
Dates		Public Comments: Comments on this notice must be received on or before May 10, 2018.
Contact		Mr. Michael Huntley, Division Chief, Vehicle and Roadside Operations Division, Office of Carrier, Driver, and Vehicle Safety, MC-PSV, (202) 366-9209, [email protected], Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
FR Citation		83 FR 12933

83 FR 12933 - Request for Comments Concerning Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) Which May Be a Barrier to the Safe Testing and Deployment of Automated Driving Systems-Equipped Commercial Motor Vehicles on Public Roads

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONFederal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 58 (March 26, 2018)

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration