83 FR 13196 - Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; State of Montana; Revisions to East Helena Lead SIP

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 60 (March 28, 2018)

Page Range		13196-13198
FR Document		2018-06109

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final action to approve State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the state of Montana on September 11, 2013. The submittal revises the portions of the State Implementation Plan (SIP) that pertain to the East Helena Lead SIP. This action is being taken under section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) (Act).

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 60 (Wednesday, March 28, 2018)

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 60 (Wednesday, March 28, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13196-13198]
From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-06109]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R08-OAR-2017-0634; FRL-9975-63--Region 8]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
State of Montana; Revisions to East Helena Lead SIP

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted
by the state of Montana on September 11, 2013. The submittal revises
the portions of the State Implementation Plan (SIP) that pertain to the
East Helena Lead SIP. This action is being taken under section 110 of
the Clean Air Act (CAA) (Act).

DATES: This final rule is effective on April 27, 2018.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket Identification Number EPA-R08-OAR-2017-0634. All documents in
the docket are listed on the http://www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information may not be publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
through http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air Program,
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street,
Denver, Colorado, 80202-1129. The EPA requests that you contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
view the hard copy of the docket. You may view the hard copy of the
docket Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., excluding federal
holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Leone, Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8, Mailcode 8P-AR, 1595
Wynkoop, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129, (303) 312-6227,
leone.kevin@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

The EPA is taking final action pertaining to SIP revisions that
stem from a June 10, 2013, Montana Board of Environmental Review Order
(Board Order) which removes a stipulated condition in an August 4, 1995
Board Order. The condition limited the allowable concentration of lead
in raw feed material at the American Chemet Corporation's East Helena
facility. Specifically, American Chemet requested a change to the 1995
Board Order which would eliminate Exhibit A, Section 3, Subsection B.
This subsection reads:

``Feed Material into the plant shall have a quarterly average
lead content of less than 0.15%, and an average annual lead content
of less than 0.10%.''

All other East Helena Lead SIP provisions, including direct
numerical limits on lead emissions from American Chemet Corporation's
East Helena facility, would remain unchanged.
On January 12, 2018, the EPA published a proposed rulemaking for
this action (83 FR 1602). The proposed rulemaking discussed the history
of the East Helena lead SIP, including the lead in feed limits that
were created in the 1995 Board Order in order to address the area's
nonattainment status for the 1978 lead National Ambient Air Quality
Standard (NAAQS). The principal target for curtailing lead emissions
was the American Smelting and Refining Company (ASARCO) facility, which
was a lead smelter located adjacent to American Chemet's East Helena
facility. In addition to shutting down its operations in 2001, ASARCO
demolished its stacks in 2009. The EPA subsequently promulgated a new,
more stringent, lead NAAQS standard (0.15 ug/m\3\). The final lead
NAAQS rulemaking was published on November 12, 2008 (73 FR 66964) and
effective December 31, 2011. The entire state of Montana, including the
East Helena area, was designated as ``Unclassifiable/Attainment'' for
the 2008 lead NAAQS.
In response to the DEQ's request for the EPA's guidance concerning
modifying the 1995 Board order to eliminate Exhibit A, Section 3,
Subsection B, the EPA sent a letter dated December 18, 2009 (see
docket) which outlined conditions which the state of Montana must meet
in order for Exhibit A, Section 3, Subsection B to be removed from the
East Helena lead SIP and, as outlined in 83 FR 1602, those conditions
have been met. For details, please see the January 12, 2018 notice
proposing approval of the revision.

II. Response to Comments

The EPA received two public comments on our proposed action to
approve Montana's September 11, 2013 SIP submittal. One comment was
submitted by Neal Blossom, Director of Global Environmental and
Regulatory Affairs for American Chemet Corporation. The other comment
was submitted anonymously. Below is a summary of the comments and the
EPA's responses.
Comment: American Chemet Corporation supports the EPA's approval of
the SIP revisions submitted

[[Page 13197]]

by the state of Montana on September 11, 2013, because the air quality
in the area will remain in compliance with the NAAQS standard, as
demonstrated by the modeling analysis submitted.
Response: The EPA agrees that final approval of the revisions
submitted by the state of Montana on September 11, 2013, will maintain
compliance with the lead NAAQS standard, as demonstrated by the
modeling analysis submitted.
Comment: The anonymous commenter made various statements about the
Endangered Species Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, and
cost-benefit analysis in general. The commenter also alleged
unspecified impacts of unspecified regulations.
Response: After reviewing the comments, the EPA has determined that
the comments are outside the scope of our proposed action or fail to
identify any material issue necessitating a response.

III. Final Action

The EPA is taking final action to approve the revisions to
Montana's 1995 Board Order to remove Exhibit A, Section 3, Subsection
B.
Section 110(l) of the CAA prohibits the EPA from approving any SIP
revision that would interfere with any applicable requirement
concerning attainment and reasonable further progress (RFP) or any
other applicable requirement of the CAA. For the reasons explained in
our January 12, 2018 proposed rulemaking notice, the removal of Exhibit
A, Section 3, Subsection B satisfies the conditions set forth in
section 110(l).
Section 193 of the CAA, which only applies to nonattainment areas,
prohibits the modification of a SIP-approved control requirement in
effect before November 15, 1990, unless the modification insures
equivalent or greater emissions reductions of such air pollutant. CAA
section 193 does not apply to this revision because the American Chemet
limits were approved into the SIP after November 15, 1990.

IV. Incorporation by Reference

In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of a revised
State of Montana Board Order as described in section III of this
preamble. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials
generally available through and at the EPA Region 8 Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this preamble for more information). Therefore, these
materials have been approved by the EPA for inclusion in the state
implementation plan, have been incorporated by reference by the EPA
into that plan, are fully federally enforceable under sections 110 and
113 of the CAA as of the effective date of the final rulemaking of the
EPA's approval, and will be incorporated by reference by the Director
of the Federal Register in the next update to the SIP compilation.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\ 62 Fed. Reg. 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state actions,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves some state law provisions as meeting federal
requirements; this action does not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not expected to be an Executive Order 13771 regulatory
action because this action is not significant under Executive Order
12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP does not apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by May 29, 2018. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See CAA section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Intergovernmental relations, Incorporation by reference, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate

[[Page 13198]]

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides,
Volatile organic compounds.

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Dated: March 22, 2018.
Douglas H. Benevento,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.

40 CFR part 52 is amended to read as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart BB--Montana

0
2. Section 52.1370 is amended in the table in paragraph (d) under the
centered heading ``(4) Lewis and Clark County'' by revising the entry
for ``Lead NAAQS--Board Orders, Stipulations, Exhibits, and
Attachments, Exhibit A--American Chemet Emissions Limitations and
Conditions, American Chemet Corporation, East Helena, Montana'' to read
as follows:

Sec. 52.1370 Identification of plan.

* * * * *
(d) * * *

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice of
Title/subject State final rule NFR citation
effective date date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Lewis and Clark County
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * * * *
Lead NAAQS--Board Orders, 06/10/2013 3/28/2018 [insert Federal Register citation].
Stipulations, Exhibits, and
Attachments, Exhibit A--American
Chemet Emissions Limitations and
Conditions, American Chemet
Corporation, East Helena, Montana.

* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2018-06109 Filed 3-27-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 28, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 13197

by the state of Montana on September INFORMATION CONTACT section of this • Is not subject to requirements of
11, 2013, because the air quality in the preamble for more information). section 12(d) of the National
area will remain in compliance with the Therefore, these materials have been Technology Transfer and Advancement
NAAQS standard, as demonstrated by approved by the EPA for inclusion in Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
the modeling analysis submitted. the state implementation plan, have application of those requirements would
Response: The EPA agrees that final been incorporated by reference by the be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
approval of the revisions submitted by EPA into that plan, are fully federally and
the state of Montana on September 11, enforceable under sections 110 and 113 • Does not provide the EPA with the
2013, will maintain compliance with of the CAA as of the effective date of the discretionary authority to address, as
the lead NAAQS standard, as final rulemaking of the EPA’s approval, appropriate, disproportionate human
demonstrated by the modeling analysis and will be incorporated by reference by health or environmental effects, using
submitted. the Director of the Federal Register in practicable and legally permissible
Comment: The anonymous the next update to the SIP compilation.1 methods, under Executive Order 12898
commenter made various statements (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
about the Endangered Species Act, the V. Statutory and Executive Order • In addition, the SIP does not apply
National Environmental Policy Act, and Reviews on any Indian reservation land or in any
cost-benefit analysis in general. The Under the CAA, the Administrator is other area where the EPA or an Indian
commenter also alleged unspecified required to approve a SIP submission tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has
impacts of unspecified regulations. that complies with the provisions of the jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
Response: After reviewing the Act and applicable federal regulations. country, the rule does not have tribal
comments, the EPA has determined that 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). implications and will not impose
the comments are outside the scope of Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the substantial direct costs on tribal
our proposed action or fail to identify EPA’s role is to approve state actions, governments or preempt tribal law as
any material issue necessitating a provided that they meet the criteria of specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
response. the CAA. Accordingly, this action FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
merely approves some state law The Congressional Review Act, 5
III. Final Action U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
provisions as meeting federal
The EPA is taking final action to requirements; this action does not Business Regulatory Enforcement
approve the revisions to Montana’s 1995 impose additional requirements beyond Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
Board Order to remove Exhibit A, those imposed by state law. For that that before a rule may take effect, the
Section 3, Subsection B. reason, this action: agency promulgating the rule must
Section 110(l) of the CAA prohibits submit a rule report, which includes a
• Is not a significant regulatory action
the EPA from approving any SIP copy of the rule, to each House of the
subject to review by the Office of
revision that would interfere with any Congress and to the Comptroller General
Management and Budget under
applicable requirement concerning of the United States. The EPA will
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
attainment and reasonable further submit a report containing this action
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
progress (RFP) or any other applicable and other required information to the
January 21, 2011);
requirement of the CAA. For the reasons U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
• Is not expected to be an Executive
explained in our January 12, 2018 Representatives, and the Comptroller
Order 13771 regulatory action because
proposed rulemaking notice, the General of the United States prior to
this action is not significant under
removal of Exhibit A, Section 3, publication of the rule in the Federal
Executive Order 12866;
Subsection B satisfies the conditions set Register. A major rule cannot take effect
• Does not impose an information
forth in section 110(l). until 60 days after it is published in the
Section 193 of the CAA, which only collection burden under the provisions
Federal Register. This action is not a
applies to nonattainment areas, of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
prohibits the modification of a SIP- U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
804(2).
approved control requirement in effect • Is certified as not having a Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
before November 15, 1990, unless the significant economic impact on a petitions for judicial review of this
modification insures equivalent or substantial number of small entities action must be filed in the United States
greater emissions reductions of such air under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 Court of Appeals for the appropriate
pollutant. CAA section 193 does not U.S.C. 601 et seq.); circuit by May 29, 2018. Filing a
apply to this revision because the • Does not contain any unfunded petition for reconsideration by the
American Chemet limits were approved mandate or significantly or uniquely Administrator of this final rule does not
into the SIP after November 15, 1990. affect small governments, as described affect the finality of this action for the
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act purposes of judicial review nor does it
IV. Incorporation by Reference of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); extend the time within which a petition
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing • Does not have federalism for judicial review may be filed, and
regulatory text that includes implications as specified in Executive shall not postpone the effectiveness of
incorporation by reference. In Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, such rule or action. This action may not
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 1999); be challenged later in proceedings to
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the • Is not an economically significant enforce its requirements. (See CAA
incorporation by reference of a revised regulatory action based on health or section 307(b)(2).)
State of Montana Board Order as safety risks subject to Executive Order
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES

described in section III of this preamble. 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
The EPA has made, and will continue • Is not a significant regulatory action Environmental protection, Air
to make, these materials generally subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
available through and at the EPA Region 28355, May 22, 2001); Intergovernmental relations,
8 Office (please contact the person Incorporation by reference, Lead,
identified in the FOR FURTHER 1 62 Fed. Reg. 27968 (May 22, 1997). Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:22 Mar 27, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\28MRR1.SGM 28MRR1

13198 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 28, 2018 / Rules and Regulations

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping PART 52—APPROVAL AND centered heading ‘‘(4) Lewis and Clark
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile PROMULGATION OF County’’ by revising the entry for ‘‘Lead
organic compounds. IMPLEMENTATION PLANS NAAQS—Board Orders, Stipulations,
Exhibits, and Attachments, Exhibit A—
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 American Chemet Emissions
Dated: March 22, 2018. continues to read as follows: Limitations and Conditions, American
Douglas H. Benevento, Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Chemet Corporation, East Helena,
Regional Administrator, Region 8. Montana’’ to read as follows:
Subpart BB—Montana
40 CFR part 52 is amended to read as § 52.1370 Identification of plan.
follows: ■ 2. Section 52.1370 is amended in the * * * * *
table in paragraph (d) under the (d) * * *

State effective Notice of final
Title/subject NFR citation
date rule date

* * * * * * *

(4) Lewis and Clark County

* * * * * * *
Lead NAAQS—Board Orders, Stipulations, Exhibits, and Attachments, Exhibit 06/10/2013 3/28/2018 [insert Federal Register ci-
A—American Chemet Emissions Limitations and Conditions, American tation].
Chemet Corporation, East Helena, Montana.

* * * * * * *

[FR Doc. 2018–06109 Filed 3–27–18; 8:45 am] implementation of the 2008 lead Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353–4489,
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P NAAQS. EPA proposed this action on svingen.eric@epa.gov.
October 18, 2017, and received two SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
public comments in response. Throughout this document whenever
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DATES: This final rule is effective on ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
AGENCY March 28, 2018. EPA. This supplementary information
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
section is arranged as follows: Is used,
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
docket for this action under Docket ID we mean EPA. This supplementary
[EPA–R05–OAR–2016–0593; FRL–9975–
No. EPA–R05–OAR–2016–0593. All information section is arranged as
93—Region 5] follows:
documents in the docket are listed on
Air Plan Approval; Illinois; the www.regulations.gov website. I. What is the background for this final rule?
Redesignation of the Chicago and Although listed in the index, some II. What are EPA’s responses to comments?
information is not publicly available, III. What actions is EPA taking?
Granite City Areas to Attainment of the IV. Incorporation by Reference
2008 Lead Standard i.e., Confidential Business Information
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
(CBI) or other information whose
AGENCY: Environmental Protection disclosure is restricted by statute. I. What is the background for this final
Agency (EPA). Certain other material, such as rule?
ACTION: Final rule. copyrighted material, is not placed on On November 12, 2008 (73 FR 66964),
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection the internet and will be publicly EPA established the 2008 primary and
Agency (EPA) is approving the Illinois available only in hard copy form. secondary lead NAAQS at 0.15
Environmental Protection Agency’s Publicly available docket materials are micrograms per cubic meter (mg/m3)
(Illinois EPA’s) request to redesignate available either through based on a maximum arithmetic 3-
the Chicago and Granite City www.regulations.gov or at the month mean concentration for a 3-year
nonattainment areas (hereafter also Environmental Protection Agency, period. See 40 CFR 50.16.
referred to as the ‘‘areas’’) to attainment Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 On November 22, 2010 (75 FR 71033),
for the 2008 national ambient air quality West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, and November 22, 2011 (76 FR 72097),
standards (NAAQS or standards) for Illinois 60604. This facility is open from EPA designated the Granite City and
lead, also identified as Pb. EPA is also 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Chicago areas, respectively, as
approving, as revisions to the Illinois Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We nonattainment for the 2008 lead
state implementation plan (SIP): The recommend that you telephone Eric NAAQS. See 40 CFR 81.314.
state’s plan for maintaining the 2008 Svingen, Environmental Engineer, at On January 9, 2014, Illinois EPA
lead NAAQS in the areas for a period of (312) 353–4489 before visiting the submitted to EPA attainment plans for
ten years following these redesignations; Region 5 office. the 2008 lead NAAQS. This submission
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES

the emissions inventories for the areas; FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric included a request to incorporate into
and rules applying emission limits and Svingen, Environmental Engineer, the Illinois SIP new rules for lead
other control requirements to lead Attainment Planning and Maintenance emission sources at Title 35 Illinois
sources in the areas. EPA is taking these Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), Administrative Code (Ill. Adm. Code)
actions in accordance with applicable Environmental Protection Agency, Part 226. On June 17, 2014, Illinois EPA
regulations and guidance that address Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, supplemented this submission with

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:22 Mar 27, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\28MRR1.SGM 28MRR1

Document Created: 2018-11-01 08:56:21
Document Modified: 2018-11-01 08:56:21

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Final rule.
Dates		This final rule is effective on April 27, 2018.
Contact		Kevin Leone, Air Program, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8, Mailcode 8P-AR, 1595 Wynkoop, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129, (303) 312-6227, [email protected]
FR Citation		83 FR 13196
CFR Associated		Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Carbon Monoxide; Intergovernmental Relations; Incorporation by Reference; Lead; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Particulate Matter; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Sulfur Oxides and Volatile Organic Compounds