83_FR_13295 83 FR 13235 - Glycine From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Notice of Amended Final Results; 2013-2014

83 FR 13235 - Glycine From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Notice of Amended Final Results; 2013-2014

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 60 (March 28, 2018)

Page Range13235-13236
FR Document2018-06149

The Court of International Trade (CIT or Court) sustained the final remand results pertaining to the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on glycine from the People's Republic of China (China), covering the period of March 1, 2013, through February 28, 2014. The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is notifying the public that the final judgment in this case is not in harmony with Commerce's final results of the administrative review and that Commerce is amending the final results with respect to the dumping margin assigned to Baoding Mantong Fine Chemistry Co. Ltd. (Baoding Mantong).

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 60 (Wednesday, March 28, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 60 (Wednesday, March 28, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13235-13236]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-06149]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-836]


Glycine From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court 
Decision Not in Harmony With Final Results of the Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review and Notice of Amended Final Results; 2013-2014

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Court of International Trade (CIT or Court) sustained the 
final remand results pertaining to the administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on glycine from the People's Republic of China 
(China), covering the period of March 1, 2013, through February 28, 
2014. The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is notifying the public 
that the final judgment in this case is not in harmony with Commerce's 
final results of the administrative review and that Commerce is 
amending the final results with respect to the dumping margin assigned 
to Baoding Mantong Fine Chemistry Co. Ltd. (Baoding Mantong).

DATES: Applicable [March 22, 2018].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edythe Artman or Brian Davis, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:

[[Page 13236]]

(202) 482-3931 or (202) 482-7924, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On October 15, 2015, Commerce published the Final Results,\1\ in 
which it determined Baoding Mantong to have a weight-averaged dumping 
margin of 143.87 percent for the period under review. On August 1, 
2017, the Court sustained three of Commerce's determinations in the 
Final Results but, with respect to findings for Baoding Mantong, 
remanded the results to Commerce for reconsideration of the surrogate 
value selection for liquid ammonia and the selection of companies used 
for the respondent's surrogate financial ratios.\2\ In the Final 
Results of Redetermination, Commerce selected a new surrogate value for 
liquid ammonia and changed its selection of surrogate financial ratios; 
these two changes resulted in a dumping margin of zero percent.\3\ On 
March 12, 2018, the Court sustained the Final Results of 
Redetermination.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Glycine from the People's Republic of China: Final 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Partial 
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014, 80 
FR 62027 (October 15, 2015) (Final Results) and accompanying Issues 
and Decision Memorandum (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
    \2\ See Evonik Rexim (Nanning) Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. v. United 
States, 253 F. Supp. 3d 1364 (2017). The Court consolidated actions 
filed by Evonik Rexim (Nanning) Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (Evonik) and 
Baoding Mantong on January 21, 2016, but later granted a motion to 
sever and stay one of Evonik's claims pending the final disposition 
of a similar claim in another segment of this antidumping duty 
proceeding.
    \3\ See ``Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court 
Remand,'' dated October 20, 2017 (Final Results of Redetermination).
    \4\ See Evonik Rexim (Nanning) Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. v. United 
States, Court No. 15-00296, Slip Op. 18-21 (CIT March 12, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Timken Notice

    In its decision in Timken,\5\ as clarified by Diamond Sawblades,\6\ 
the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that, pursuant to 
section 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 
Commerce must publish a notice of a court decision that is not ``in 
harmony'' with a Commerce determination and must suspend liquidation of 
entries pending a ``conclusive'' court decision. The CIT's March 12, 
2018, final judgment sustaining the Final Results of Redetermination 
constitutes a final decision of the Court that is not in harmony with 
Commerce's Final Results. This notice is published in fulfillment of 
the Timken publication requirements. Accordingly, Commerce will 
continue the suspension of liquidation of the subject merchandise 
pending a final and conclusive court decision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 
1990) (Timken).
    \6\ See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626 
F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amended Final Results of Review

    Because there is now a final court decision, Commerce is amending 
the Final Results with respect to the dumping margin calculated for 
Baoding Mantong. Based on the Final Results of Redetermination, as 
sustained by the CIT, the revised dumping margin for Baoding Mantong, 
for the period March 1, 2013, through February 28, 2014, is as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Weighted-
                                                              average
                  Producer or exporter                    dumping margin
                                                             (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baoding Mantong Fine Chemistry Co. Ltd..................            0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the event the Court's ruling is not appealed or, if appealed, 
upheld by a final and conclusive court decision, Commerce will instruct 
the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping 
duties on unliquidated entries of subject merchandise with respect to 
Baoding Mantong.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    As Baoding Mantong's cash deposit rate has not been subject to 
subsequent administrative reviews, Commerce will issue revised cash 
deposit instructions to CBP adjusting the rate for Baoding Mantong to 
zero percent, effective March 22, 2018.

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
516A(e)(1), 751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: March 22, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2018-06149 Filed 3-27-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P



                                                                           Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 28, 2018 / Notices                                                  13235

                                               instruct U.S. Customs and Border                        judicial protective order, is hereby                    Comment 1: Date of Sale and Use of
                                               Protection (CBP) to continue to suspend                 requested. Failure to comply with the                      Constructed Export Price
                                               liquidation of all appropriate entries of               regulations and the terms of an APO is                  Comment 2: Inclusion of Certain
                                                                                                                                                                  Extraordinary Expenses in GSW’s Net
                                               wire rod from Spain, which were                         a sanctionable violation.
                                                                                                                                                                  General and Administrative Expenses
                                               entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,                                                                           Comment 3: Correction of Certain Data
                                                                                                       Notification to Interested Parties
                                               for consumption on or after October 31,                                                                            Errors
                                               2017, the date of publication of the                       This determination and this notice are               Comment 4: Inclusion of Income
                                               preliminary determination of this                       issued and published pursuant to                           Attributable to Certain Scrap Sales in
                                               investigation in the Federal Register.                  sections 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act                   GSW’s Net General and Administrative
                                               For entries made by AME, in accordance                  and 19 CFR 351.210(c).                                     Expenses
                                               with section 735(c)(4)(A) of the Act,                                                                           Comment 5: Adjustment of GSW’s
                                                                                                         Dated: March 19, 2018.
                                               because we continue to find that critical                                                                          Reported Costs To Reflect the Yield Loss
                                                                                                       Gary Taverman,                                             Attributable to the Cutting Stage of the
                                               circumstances exist, we will instruct                   Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping                 Production Process
                                               CBP to continue to suspend liquidation                  and Countervailing Duty Operations,                     Comment 6: Whether GSW Understated its
                                               of all appropriate entries of wire rod                  performing the non-exclusive functions and                 Per-Unit Costs by Reporting Sales
                                               from Spain which were entered, or                       duties of the Assistant Secretary for                      Quantities
                                               withdrawn from warehouse, for                           Enforcement and Compliance.                             Comment 7: Whether GSW Improperly
                                               consumption on or after August 2, 2017,                                                                            Calculated Direct Materials Cost on a
                                                                                                       Appendix I                                                 Product-Group Basis
                                               which is 90 days prior to the date of
                                               publication of the preliminary                                                                                  Comment 8: Inclusion of Certain Items in
                                                                                                       Scope of the Investigation                                 the Calculation of the CELSA
                                               determination of this investigation in
                                                                                                          The products covered by this investigation              Companies’ General and Administrative
                                               the Federal Register.                                   are certain hot-rolled products of carbon steel            Expense Rates
                                                  Further, Commerce will instruct CBP                  and alloy steel, in coils, of approximately             Comment 9: AFA
                                               to require a cash deposit equal to the                  round cross section, less than 19.00 mm in            IX. Recommendation
                                               estimated weighted-average dumping                      actual solid cross-sectional diameter.
                                               margins as shown above.                                                                                       [FR Doc. 2018–06147 Filed 3–27–18; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                       Specifically excluded are steel products
                                                                                                       possessing the above-noted physical                   BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
                                               International Trade Commission (ITC)                    characteristics and meeting the Harmonized
                                               Notification                                            Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
                                                  In accordance with section 735(d) of                 definitions for (a) stainless steel; (b) tool         DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
                                               the Act, we will notify the ITC of the                  steel; (c) high-nickel steel; (d) ball bearing
                                               final affirmative determination of sales                steel; or (e) concrete reinforcing bars and           International Trade Administration
                                                                                                       rods. Also excluded are free cutting steel
                                               at LTFV. Because the final                                                                                    [A–570–836]
                                                                                                       (also known as free machining steel)
                                               determination in this proceeding is                     products (i.e., products that contain by
                                               affirmative, in accordance with section                 weight one or more of the following                   Glycine From the People’s Republic of
                                               735(b)(2) of the Act, the ITC will make                 elements: 0.1 percent of more of lead, 0.05           China: Notice of Court Decision Not in
                                               its final determination as to whether the               percent or more of bismuth, 0.08 percent or           Harmony With Final Results of the
                                               domestic industry in the United States                  more of sulfur, more than 0.04 percent of             Antidumping Duty Administrative
                                               is materially injured, or threatened with               phosphorous, more than 0.05 percent of                Review and Notice of Amended Final
                                               material injury, by reason of imports of                selenium, or more than 0.01 percent of                Results; 2013–2014
                                               wire rod from Spain sold in the United                  tellurium). All products meeting the physical
                                                                                                       description of subject merchandise that are           AGENCY:  Enforcement and Compliance,
                                               States at LTFV no later than 45 days                    not specifically excluded are included in this        International Trade Administration,
                                               after our final determination. If the ITC               scope.                                                Department of Commerce.
                                               determines that material injury or threat                  The products under investigation are               SUMMARY: The Court of International
                                               of material injury does not exist, the                  currently classifiable under subheadings
                                               proceeding will be terminated and all                   7213.91.3011, 7213.91.3015, 7213.91.3020,
                                                                                                                                                             Trade (CIT or Court) sustained the final
                                               cash deposits will be refunded. If the                  7213.91.3093, 7213.91.4500, 7213.91.6000,             remand results pertaining to the
                                               ITC determines that such injury does                    7213.99.0030, 7227.20.0030, 7227.20.0080,             administrative review of the
                                               exist, Commerce will issue an                           7227.90.6010, 7227.90.6020, 7227.90.6030,             antidumping duty order on glycine from
                                               antidumping duty order directing CBP
                                                                                                       and 7227.90.6035 of the HTSUS. Products               the People’s Republic of China (China),
                                                                                                       entered under subheadings 7213.99.0090 and            covering the period of March 1, 2013,
                                               to assess, upon further instruction by                  7227.90.6090 of the HTSUS may also be
                                               Commerce, antidumping duties on all                                                                           through February 28, 2014. The
                                                                                                       included in this scope if they meet the               Department of Commerce (Commerce) is
                                               imports of the subject merchandise                      physical description of subject merchandise
                                               entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,                   above. Although the HTSUS subheadings are
                                                                                                                                                             notifying the public that the final
                                               for consumption on or after the effective               provided for convenience and customs                  judgment in this case is not in harmony
                                               date of the suspension of liquidation, as               purposes, the written description of the              with Commerce’s final results of the
                                               discussed above in the ‘‘Continuation of                scope of these proceedings is dispositive.            administrative review and that
                                               Suspension of Liquidation’’ section.                                                                          Commerce is amending the final results
                                                                                                       Appendix II                                           with respect to the dumping margin
                                               Notification Regarding Administrative                                                                         assigned to Baoding Mantong Fine
                                               Protective Orders (APO)                                 List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and            Chemistry Co. Ltd. (Baoding Mantong).
                                                                                                       Decision Memorandum                                   DATES: Applicable [March 22, 2018].
                                                 This notice serves as a reminder to
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES




                                               parties subject to APO of their                         I. Summary                                            FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                               responsibility concerning the                           II. Background                                        Edythe Artman or Brian Davis, AD/CVD
                                                                                                       III. Use of Adverse Facts Available
                                               disposition of proprietary information                  IV. Critical Circumstances
                                                                                                                                                             Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and
                                               disclosed under APO in accordance                       V. Scope of the Investigation                         Compliance, International Trade
                                               with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely                       VI. Scope Comments                                    Administration, U.S. Department of
                                               notification of the return or destruction               VII. Margin Calculations                              Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
                                               of APO materials, or conversion to                      VIII. Discussion of the Issues:                       NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:


                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014   20:30 Mar 27, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00014   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM   28MRN1


                                               13236                       Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 28, 2018 / Notices

                                               (202) 482–3931 or (202) 482–7924,                       Results. This notice is published in                  DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
                                               respectively.                                           fulfillment of the Timken publication
                                               SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                              requirements. Accordingly, Commerce                   International Trade Administration
                                                                                                       will continue the suspension of
                                               Background                                              liquidation of the subject merchandise                [A–570–055]
                                                  On October 15, 2015, Commerce                        pending a final and conclusive court
                                               published the Final Results,1 in which                  decision.                                             Carton-Closing Staples From the
                                               it determined Baoding Mantong to have                                                                         People’s Republic of China: Final
                                               a weight-averaged dumping margin of                     Amended Final Results of Review                       Affirmative Determination of Sales at
                                               143.87 percent for the period under                                                                           Less Than Fair Value
                                                                                                          Because there is now a final court
                                               review. On August 1, 2017, the Court
                                                                                                       decision, Commerce is amending the                      Enforcement and Compliance,
                                                                                                                                                             AGENCY:
                                               sustained three of Commerce’s
                                                                                                       Final Results with respect to the             International Trade Administration,
                                               determinations in the Final Results but,
                                                                                                       dumping margin calculated for Baoding         Department of Commerce.
                                               with respect to findings for Baoding
                                               Mantong, remanded the results to                        Mantong. Based on the Final Results of        SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
                                               Commerce for reconsideration of the                     Redetermination, as sustained by the          (Commerce) determines that carton-
                                               surrogate value selection for liquid                    CIT, the revised dumping margin for           closing staples from the People’s
                                               ammonia and the selection of                            Baoding Mantong, for the period March         Republic of China (China) are being, or
                                               companies used for the respondent’s                     1, 2013, through February 28, 2014, is        are likely to be, sold in the United States
                                               surrogate financial ratios.2 In the Final               as follows:                                   at less than fair value (LTFV). The final
                                               Results of Redetermination, Commerce                                                                  dumping margin of sales at LTFV is
                                               selected a new surrogate value for liquid                                                 Weighted-   shown in the ‘‘Final Determination’’
                                                                                                                                          average    section of this notice.
                                               ammonia and changed its selection of                         Producer or exporter         dumping
                                               surrogate financial ratios; these two                                                      margin     DATES: Applicable March 28, 2018.
                                               changes resulted in a dumping margin                                                      (percent)
                                                                                                                                                     FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                               of zero percent.3 On March 12, 2018, the                                                              Irene Gorelik, AD/CVD Operations,
                                               Court sustained the Final Results of                    Baoding Mantong Fine
                                               Redetermination.4                                         Chemistry Co. Ltd .............        0.00 Office VIII, Enforcement and
                                                                                                                                                     Compliance, International Trade
                                               Timken Notice                                                                                         Administration, U.S. Department of
                                                                                                          In the event the Court’s ruling is not
                                                 In its decision in Timken,5 as clarified                                                            Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
                                                                                                       appealed or, if appealed, upheld by a         NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
                                               by Diamond Sawblades,6 the Court of                     final and conclusive court decision,
                                               Appeals for the Federal Circuit held                                                                  (202) 482–6905.
                                                                                                       Commerce will instruct the U.S.
                                               that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of the                                                              SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                                                                       Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
                                               Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),               assess antidumping duties on                  Background
                                               Commerce must publish a notice of a                     unliquidated entries of subject
                                               court decision that is not ‘‘in harmony’’                                                                On November 3, 2017, Commerce
                                                                                                       merchandise with respect to Baoding
                                               with a Commerce determination and                                                                     published in the Federal Register its
                                                                                                       Mantong.                                      preliminary affirmative determination
                                               must suspend liquidation of entries
                                               pending a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision.                Cash Deposit Requirements                             in the LTFV investigation of carton-
                                               The CIT’s March 12, 2018, final                                                                               closing staples from China.1 For a
                                               judgment sustaining the Final Results of                   As Baoding Mantong’s cash deposit                  complete description of the events that
                                               Redetermination constitutes a final                     rate has not been subject to subsequent               followed the Preliminary Determination,
                                               decision of the Court that is not in                    administrative reviews, Commerce will                 see the Issues and Decision
                                               harmony with Commerce’s Final                           issue revised cash deposit instructions               Memorandum that is dated concurrently
                                                                                                       to CBP adjusting the rate for Baoding                 with this determination and hereby
                                                 1 See Glycine from the People’s Republic of           Mantong to zero percent, effective                    adopted by this notice.2 Commerce
                                               China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty                March 22, 2018.                                       exercised its discretion to toll deadlines
                                               Administrative Review and Partial Rescission of                                                               affected by the closure of the Federal
                                               Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013–           Notification to Interested Parties
                                               2014, 80 FR 62027 (October 15, 2015) (Final                                                                   Government from January 20 through
                                               Results) and accompanying Issues and Decision             This notice is issued and published in              22, 2018. If the new deadline falls on a
                                               Memorandum (Issues and Decision Memorandum).                                                                  non-business day, in accordance with
                                                 2 See Evonik Rexim (Nanning) Pharmaceutical           accordance with sections 516A(e)(1),
                                                                                                                                                             Commerce’s practice, the deadline will
                                               Co. Ltd. v. United States, 253 F. Supp. 3d 1364         751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
                                               (2017). The Court consolidated actions filed by
                                                                                                                                                             become the next business day. The
                                               Evonik Rexim (Nanning) Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.            Dated: March 22, 2018.                              revised deadline for the final
                                               (Evonik) and Baoding Mantong on January 21, 2016,       Gary Taverman,
                                               but later granted a motion to sever and stay one of                                                             1 See Carton-Closing Staples from the People’s
                                               Evonik’s claims pending the final disposition of a
                                                                                                       Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
                                                                                                       and Countervailing Duty Operations,                   Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative
                                               similar claim in another segment of this                                                                      Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value,
                                               antidumping duty proceeding.                            performing the non-exclusive functions and            Postponement of Final Determination and
                                                 3 See ‘‘Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant     duties of the Assistant Secretary for                 Extension of Provisional Measures, 82 FR 51213
                                               to Court Remand,’’ dated October 20, 2017 (Final        Enforcement and Compliance.                           (November 3, 2017) (Preliminary Determination)
                                               Results of Redetermination).
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                       [FR Doc. 2018–06149 Filed 3–27–18; 8:45 am]           and accompanying Preliminary Decision
                                                 4 See Evonik Rexim (Nanning) Pharmaceutical
                                                                                                                                                             Memorandum.
                                               Co. Ltd. v. United States, Court No. 15–00296, Slip     BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P                                  2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
                                               Op. 18–21 (CIT March 12, 2018).                                                                               Memorandum for the Final Affirmative
                                                 5 See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337
                                                                                                                                                             Determination in the Less-Than-Fair-Value
                                               (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken).                                                                                    Investigation of Carton-Closing Staples from the
                                                 6 See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v.                                                                  People’s Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently
                                               United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010)                                                                 with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and
                                               (Diamond Sawblades).                                                                                          Decision Memorandum).



                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014   20:30 Mar 27, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00015   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM   28MRN1



Document Created: 2018-11-01 08:55:50
Document Modified: 2018-11-01 08:55:50
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesApplicable [March 22, 2018].
ContactEdythe Artman or Brian Davis, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3931 or (202) 482-7924, respectively.
FR Citation83 FR 13235 

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR