83 FR 13295 - HEARTH Act Approval of Apache Tribe of Oklahoma Indian Lands Leasing Act of 2017 Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 60 (March 28, 2018)
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 60 (March 28, 2018)
| Page Range | 13295-13297 | |
| FR Document | 2018-06227 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 60 (Wednesday, March 28, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 13295-13297] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-06227] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Indian Affairs [189A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900] HEARTH Act Approval of Apache Tribe of Oklahoma Indian Lands Leasing Act of 2017 Regulations AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior. ACTION: Notice. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 13296]] SUMMARY: On December 28, 2017, the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) approved the Apache Tribe of Oklahoma Indian Lands Leasing Act of 2017 leasing Regulations under the Helping Expedite and Advance Responsible Tribal Homeownership Act of 2012 (HEARTH Act). With this approval, the Tribe is authorized to enter into business, wind and solar, wind energy evaluation, and other authorized purposes leases without further BIA approval. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Sharlene Round Face, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Division of Real Estate Services, 1849 C Street NW, MS- 4642-MIB, Washington, DC 20240, at (202) 208-3615. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Summary of the HEARTH Act The HEARTH Act makes a voluntary, alternative land leasing process available to tribes, by amending the Indian Long-Term Leasing Act of 1955, 25 U.S.C. 415. The HEARTH Act authorizes Tribes to negotiate and enter into agricultural and business leases of Tribal trust lands with a primary term of 25 years, and up to two renewal terms of 25 years each, without the approval of the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary). The HEARTH Act also authorizes Tribes to enter into leases for residential, recreational, religious or educational purposes for a primary term of up to 75 years without the approval of the Secretary. Participating Tribes develop Tribal leasing regulations, including an environmental review process, and then must obtain the Secretary's approval of those regulations prior to entering into leases. The HEARTH Act requires the Secretary to approve Tribal regulations if the Tribal regulations are consistent with the Department of the Interior's (Department) leasing regulations at 25 CFR part 162 and provide for an environmental review process that meets requirements set forth in the HEARTH Act. This notice announces that the Secretary, through the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, has approved the Tribal regulations for the Apache Tribe of Oklahoma. II. Federal Preemption of State and Local Taxes The Department's regulations governing the surface leasing of trust and restricted Indian lands specify that, subject to applicable Federal law, permanent improvements on leased land, leasehold or possessory interests, and activities under the lease are not subject to State and local taxation and may be subject to taxation by the Indian Tribe with jurisdiction. See 25 CFR 162.017. As explained further in the preamble to the final regulations, the Federal government has a strong interest in promoting economic development, self-determination, and Tribal sovereignty. 77 FR 72440, 72447-48 (December 5, 2012). The principles supporting the Federal preemption of State law in the field of Indian leasing and the taxation of lease-related interests and activities applies with equal force to leases entered into under Tribal leasing regulations approved by the Federal government pursuant to the HEARTH Act. Section 5 of the Indian Reorganization Act, 25 U.S.C. 465, preempts State and local taxation of permanent improvements on trust land. Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation v. Thurston County, 724 F.3d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 2013) (citing Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Jones, 411 U.S. 145 (1973)). Similarly, section 465 preempts State taxation of rent payments by a lessee for leased trust lands, because ``tax on the payment of rent is indistinguishable from an impermissible tax on the land.'' See Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Stranburg, No. 14- 14524, *13-*17, n.8 (11th Cir. 2015). In addition, as explained in the preamble to the revised leasing regulations at 25 CFR part 162, Federal courts have applied a balancing test to determine whether State and local taxation of non-Indians on the reservation is preempted. White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker, 448 U.S. 136, 143 (1980). The Bracker balancing test, which is conducted against a backdrop of ``traditional notions of Indian self-government,'' requires a particularized examination of the relevant State, Federal, and Tribal interests. We hereby adopt the Bracker analysis from the preamble to the surface leasing regulations, 77 FR at 72447-48, as supplemented by the analysis below. The strong Federal and Tribal interests against State and local taxation of improvements, leaseholds, and activities on land leased under the Department's leasing regulations apply equally to improvements, leaseholds, and activities on land leased pursuant to Tribal leasing regulations approved under the HEARTH Act. Congress's overarching intent was to ``allow tribes to exercise greater control over their own land, support self-determination, and eliminate bureaucratic delays that stand in the way of homeownership and economic development in tribal communities.'' 158 Cong. Rec. H. 2682 (May 15, 2012). The HEARTH Act was intended to afford Tribes ``flexibility to adapt lease terms to suit [their] business and cultural needs'' and to ``enable [Tribes] to approve leases quickly and efficiently.'' Id. at 5-6. Assessment of State and local taxes would obstruct these express Federal policies supporting Tribal economic development and self- determination, and also threaten substantial Tribal interests in effective Tribal government, economic self-sufficiency, and territorial autonomy. See Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community, 134 S. Ct. 2024, 2043 (2014) (Sotomayor, J., concurring) (determining that ``[a] key goal of the Federal Government is to render Tribes more self- sufficient, and better positioned to fund their own sovereign functions, rather than relying on Federal funding''). The additional costs of State and local taxation have a chilling effect on potential lessees, as well as on a Tribe that, as a result, might refrain from exercising its own sovereign right to impose a Tribal tax to support its infrastructure needs. See id. at 2043-44 (finding that State and local taxes greatly discourage Tribes from raising tax revenue from the same sources because the imposition of double taxation would impede Tribal economic growth). Similar to BIA's surface leasing regulations, Tribal regulations under the HEARTH Act pervasively cover all aspects of leasing. See 25 U.S.C. 415(h)(3)(B)(i) (requiring Tribal regulations be consistent with BIA surface leasing regulations). Furthermore, the Federal government remains involved in the Tribal land leasing process by approving the Tribal leasing regulations in the first instance and providing technical assistance, upon request by a Tribe, for the development of an environmental review process. The Secretary also retains authority to take any necessary actions to remedy violations of a lease or of the Tribal regulations, including terminating the lease or rescinding approval of the Tribal regulations and reassuming lease approval responsibilities. Moreover, the Secretary continues to review, approve, and monitor individual Indian land leases and other types of leases not covered under the Tribal regulations according to the part 162 regulations. Accordingly, the Federal and Tribal interests weigh heavily in favor of preemption of State and local taxes on lease-related activities and interests, regardless of whether the lease is governed by Tribal leasing regulations or part 162. Improvements, activities, and leasehold or possessory interests may be subject to taxation by the Apache Tribe of Oklahoma. [[Page 13297]] Dated: December 28, 2017. John Tahsuda, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, Exercising the Authority of the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs. [FR Doc. 2018-06227 Filed 3-27-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 28, 2018 / Notices 13295
Homeownership) Act of 2012 (the Act) U.S. 145 (1973)). Similarly, section 5108 infrastructure needs. See id. at 2043–44
makes a voluntary, alternative land preempts state taxation of rent payments (finding that State and local taxes
leasing process available to Tribes, by by a lessee for leased trust lands, greatly discourage Tribes from raising
amending the Indian Long-Term Leasing because ‘‘tax on the payment of rent is tax revenue from the same sources
Act of 1955, 25 U.S.C. 415. The Act indistinguishable from an impermissible because the imposition of double
authorizes Tribes to negotiate and enter tax on the land.’’ See Seminole Tribe of taxation would impede Tribal economic
into agricultural and business leases of Florida v. Stranburg, No. 14–14524, growth).
Tribal trust lands with a primary term *13–*17, n.8 (11th Cir. 2015). In Similar to BIA’s surface leasing
of 25 years, and up to two renewal terms addition, as explained in the preamble regulations, Tribal regulations under the
of 25 years each, without the approval to the revised leasing regulations at 25 HEARTH Act pervasively cover all
of the Secretary of the Interior. The Act CFR part 162, Federal courts have aspects of leasing. See 25 U.S.C.
also authorizes Tribes to enter into applied a balancing test to determine 415(h)(3)(B)(i) (requiring Tribal
leases for residential, recreational, whether State and local taxation of non- regulations be consistent with BIA
religious or educational purposes for a Indians on the reservation is preempted. surface leasing regulations).
primary term of up to 75 years without White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Furthermore, the Federal government
the approval of the Secretary. Bracker, 448 U.S. 136, 143 (1980). The remains involved in the Tribal land
Participating Tribes develop Tribal Bracker balancing test, which is leasing process by approving the Tribal
leasing regulations, including an conducted against a backdrop of leasing regulations in the first instance
environmental review process, and then ‘‘traditional notions of Indian self- and providing technical assistance,
must obtain the Secretary’s approval of government,’’ requires a particularized upon request by a Tribe, for the
those regulations prior to entering into examination of the relevant State, development of an environmental
leases. The Act requires the Secretary to Federal, and Tribal interests. We hereby review process. The Secretary also
approve Tribal regulations if the Tribal adopt the Bracker analysis from the retains authority to take any necessary
regulations are consistent with the preamble to the surface leasing actions to remedy violations of a lease
Department’s leasing regulations at 25 regulations, 77 FR at 72,447–48, as or of the Tribal regulations, including
CFR part 162 and provide for an supplemented by the analysis below. terminating the lease or rescinding
environmental review process that The strong Federal and Tribal approval of the Tribal regulations and
meets requirements set forth in the Act. interests against State and local taxation reassuming lease approval
This notice announces that the of improvements, leaseholds, and responsibilities. Moreover, the Secretary
Secretary, through the Assistant activities on land leased under the continues to review, approve, and
Secretary—Indian Affairs, has approved Department’s leasing regulations apply monitor individual Indian land leases
the Tribal regulations for the Pechanga equally to improvements, leaseholds, and other types of leases not covered
Band of Luiseno Mission Indians. and activities on land leased pursuant to under the Tribal regulations according
Tribal leasing regulations approved to the part 162 regulations.
II. Federal Preemption of State and under the HEARTH Act. Congress’s
Local Taxes Accordingly, the Federal and Tribal
overarching intent was to ‘‘allow tribes interests weigh heavily in favor of
The Department’s regulations to exercise greater control over their preemption of State and local taxes on
governing the surface leasing of trust own land, support self-determination, lease-related activities and interests,
and restricted Indian lands specify that, and eliminate bureaucratic delays that
subject to applicable Federal law, regardless of whether the lease is
stand in the way of homeownership and
permanent improvements on leased governed by Tribal leasing regulations
economic development in tribal
land, leasehold or possessory interests, or part 162. Improvements, activities,
communities.’’ 158 Cong. Rec. H. 2682
and activities under the lease are not and leasehold or possessory interests
(May 15, 2012). The HEARTH Act was
subject to State and local taxation and may be subject to taxation by the
intended to afford Tribes ‘‘flexibility to
may be subject to taxation by the Indian Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission
adapt lease terms to suit [their] business
Tribe with jurisdiction. See 25 CFR Indians.
and cultural needs’’ and to ‘‘enable
162.017. As explained further in the [Tribes] to approve leases quickly and Dated: December 28, 2017.
preamble to the final regulations, the efficiently.’’ Id. at 5–6. John Tahusda,
Federal government has a strong interest Assessment of State and local taxes Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian
in promoting economic development, would obstruct these express Federal Affairs Exercising the Authority of the
self-determination, and Tribal policies supporting Tribal economic Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
sovereignty. 77 FR 72,440, 72,447–48 development and self-determination, [FR Doc. 2018–06231 Filed 3–27–18; 8:45 am]
(December 5, 2012). The principles and also threaten substantial Tribal BILLING CODE 4337–15–P
supporting the Federal preemption of interests in effective Tribal government,
State law in the field of Indian leasing economic self-sufficiency, and territorial
and the taxation of lease-related autonomy. See Michigan v. Bay Mills DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
interests and activities applies with Indian Community, 134 S. Ct. 2024,
equal force to leases entered into under 2043 (2014) (Sotomayor, J., concurring) Bureau of Indian Affairs
Tribal leasing regulations approved by (determining that ‘‘[a] key goal of the
the Federal government pursuant to the Federal Government is to render Tribes [189A2100DD/AAKC001030/
HEARTH Act. more self-sufficient, and better A0A501010.999900]
Section 5 of the Indian Reorganization positioned to fund their own sovereign
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Act, 25 U.S.C. 5108, preempts State and functions, rather than relying on Federal HEARTH Act Approval of Apache Tribe
local taxation of permanent funding’’). The additional costs of State of Oklahoma Indian Lands Leasing Act
improvements on trust land. and local taxation have a chilling effect of 2017 Regulations
Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis on potential lessees, as well as on a AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Reservation v. Thurston County, 724 Tribe that, as a result, might refrain from Interior.
F.3d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 2013) (citing exercising its own sovereign right to
ACTION: Notice.
Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Jones, 411 impose a Tribal tax to support its
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:30 Mar 27, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM 28MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_13355/page/1.svg)
![13296 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 28, 2018 / Notices
SUMMARY: On December 28, 2017, the Tribe with jurisdiction. See 25 CFR adapt lease terms to suit [their] business
Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) approved 162.017. As explained further in the and cultural needs’’ and to ‘‘enable
the Apache Tribe of Oklahoma Indian preamble to the final regulations, the [Tribes] to approve leases quickly and
Lands Leasing Act of 2017 leasing Federal government has a strong interest efficiently.’’ Id. at 5–6.
Regulations under the Helping Expedite in promoting economic development, Assessment of State and local taxes
and Advance Responsible Tribal self-determination, and Tribal would obstruct these express Federal
Homeownership Act of 2012 (HEARTH sovereignty. 77 FR 72440, 72447–48 policies supporting Tribal economic
Act). With this approval, the Tribe is (December 5, 2012). The principles development and self-determination,
authorized to enter into business, wind supporting the Federal preemption of and also threaten substantial Tribal
and solar, wind energy evaluation, and State law in the field of Indian leasing interests in effective Tribal government,
other authorized purposes leases and the taxation of lease-related economic self-sufficiency, and territorial
without further BIA approval. interests and activities applies with autonomy. See Michigan v. Bay Mills
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. equal force to leases entered into under Indian Community, 134 S. Ct. 2024,
Sharlene Round Face, Bureau of Indian Tribal leasing regulations approved by 2043 (2014) (Sotomayor, J., concurring)
Affairs, Division of Real Estate Services, the Federal government pursuant to the (determining that ‘‘[a] key goal of the
1849 C Street NW, MS–4642–MIB, HEARTH Act. Federal Government is to render Tribes
Washington, DC 20240, at (202) 208– Section 5 of the Indian Reorganization more self-sufficient, and better
3615. Act, 25 U.S.C. 465, preempts State and positioned to fund their own sovereign
local taxation of permanent functions, rather than relying on Federal
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: improvements on trust land. funding’’). The additional costs of State
I. Summary of the HEARTH Act Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis and local taxation have a chilling effect
Reservation v. Thurston County, 724 on potential lessees, as well as on a
The HEARTH Act makes a voluntary, F.3d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 2013) (citing Tribe that, as a result, might refrain from
alternative land leasing process Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Jones, 411 exercising its own sovereign right to
available to tribes, by amending the U.S. 145 (1973)). Similarly, section 465 impose a Tribal tax to support its
Indian Long-Term Leasing Act of 1955, preempts State taxation of rent infrastructure needs. See id. at 2043–44
25 U.S.C. 415. The HEARTH Act payments by a lessee for leased trust (finding that State and local taxes
authorizes Tribes to negotiate and enter lands, because ‘‘tax on the payment of greatly discourage Tribes from raising
into agricultural and business leases of rent is indistinguishable from an tax revenue from the same sources
Tribal trust lands with a primary term impermissible tax on the land.’’ See because the imposition of double
of 25 years, and up to two renewal terms Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Stranburg, taxation would impede Tribal economic
of 25 years each, without the approval No. 14–14524, *13–*17, n.8 (11th Cir. growth).
of the Secretary of the Interior 2015). In addition, as explained in the Similar to BIA’s surface leasing
(Secretary). The HEARTH Act also preamble to the revised leasing regulations, Tribal regulations under the
authorizes Tribes to enter into leases for regulations at 25 CFR part 162, Federal HEARTH Act pervasively cover all
residential, recreational, religious or courts have applied a balancing test to aspects of leasing. See 25 U.S.C.
educational purposes for a primary term determine whether State and local 415(h)(3)(B)(i) (requiring Tribal
of up to 75 years without the approval taxation of non-Indians on the regulations be consistent with BIA
of the Secretary. Participating Tribes reservation is preempted. White surface leasing regulations).
develop Tribal leasing regulations, Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker, 448 Furthermore, the Federal government
including an environmental review U.S. 136, 143 (1980). The Bracker remains involved in the Tribal land
process, and then must obtain the balancing test, which is conducted leasing process by approving the Tribal
Secretary’s approval of those regulations against a backdrop of ‘‘traditional leasing regulations in the first instance
prior to entering into leases. The notions of Indian self-government,’’ and providing technical assistance,
HEARTH Act requires the Secretary to requires a particularized examination of upon request by a Tribe, for the
approve Tribal regulations if the Tribal the relevant State, Federal, and Tribal development of an environmental
regulations are consistent with the interests. We hereby adopt the Bracker review process. The Secretary also
Department of the Interior’s analysis from the preamble to the retains authority to take any necessary
(Department) leasing regulations at 25 surface leasing regulations, 77 FR at actions to remedy violations of a lease
CFR part 162 and provide for an 72447–48, as supplemented by the or of the Tribal regulations, including
environmental review process that analysis below. terminating the lease or rescinding
meets requirements set forth in the The strong Federal and Tribal approval of the Tribal regulations and
HEARTH Act. This notice announces interests against State and local taxation reassuming lease approval
that the Secretary, through the Assistant of improvements, leaseholds, and responsibilities. Moreover, the Secretary
Secretary—Indian Affairs, has approved activities on land leased under the continues to review, approve, and
the Tribal regulations for the Apache Department’s leasing regulations apply monitor individual Indian land leases
Tribe of Oklahoma. equally to improvements, leaseholds, and other types of leases not covered
and activities on land leased pursuant to under the Tribal regulations according
II. Federal Preemption of State and Tribal leasing regulations approved to the part 162 regulations.
Local Taxes under the HEARTH Act. Congress’s Accordingly, the Federal and Tribal
The Department’s regulations overarching intent was to ‘‘allow tribes interests weigh heavily in favor of
governing the surface leasing of trust to exercise greater control over their preemption of State and local taxes on
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
and restricted Indian lands specify that, own land, support self-determination, lease-related activities and interests,
subject to applicable Federal law, and eliminate bureaucratic delays that regardless of whether the lease is
permanent improvements on leased stand in the way of homeownership and governed by Tribal leasing regulations
land, leasehold or possessory interests, economic development in tribal or part 162. Improvements, activities,
and activities under the lease are not communities.’’ 158 Cong. Rec. H. 2682 and leasehold or possessory interests
subject to State and local taxation and (May 15, 2012). The HEARTH Act was may be subject to taxation by the
may be subject to taxation by the Indian intended to afford Tribes ‘‘flexibility to Apache Tribe of Oklahoma.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:30 Mar 27, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00075 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM 28MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_13355/page/2.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 28, 2018 / Notices 13297
Dated: December 28, 2017. Secretary, through the Assistant activities on land leased under the
John Tahsuda, Secretary—Indian Affairs, has approved Department’s leasing regulations apply
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian the Tribal regulations for the Kootenai equally to improvements, leaseholds,
Affairs, Exercising the Authority of the Tribe of Idaho. and activities on land leased pursuant to
Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs. Tribal leasing regulations approved
II. Federal Preemption of State and
[FR Doc. 2018–06227 Filed 3–27–18; 8:45 am] under the HEARTH Act. Congress’s
Local Taxes
BILLING CODE 4337–15–P overarching intent was to ‘‘allow tribes
The Department’s regulations to exercise greater control over their
governing the surface leasing of trust own land, support self-determination,
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and restricted Indian lands specify that, and eliminate bureaucratic delays that
subject to applicable Federal law, stand in the way of homeownership and
Bureau of Indian Affairs permanent improvements on leased economic development in tribal
[189A2100DD/AAKC001030/ land, leasehold or possessory interests, communities.’’ 158 Cong. Rec. H. 2682
A0A501010.999900] and activities under the lease are not (May 15, 2012). The HEARTH Act was
subject to State and local taxation and intended to afford Tribes ‘‘flexibility to
HEARTH Act Approval of Kootenai may be subject to taxation by the Indian adapt lease terms to suit [their] business
Tribe of Idaho’s Regulations Tribe with jurisdiction. See 25 CFR and cultural needs’’ and to ‘‘enable
162.017. As explained further in the [Tribes] to approve leases quickly and
AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, preamble to the final regulations, the
Interior. efficiently.’’ Id. at 5–6.
Federal government has a strong interest Assessment of State and local taxes
ACTION: Notice. in promoting economic development, would obstruct these express Federal
SUMMARY: On November 9, 2017, the self-determination, and Tribal policies supporting Tribal economic
Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) approved sovereignty. 77 FR 72,440, 72,447–48 development and self-determination,
the Kootenai Tribe of Idaho’s leasing (December 5, 2012). The principles and also threaten substantial Tribal
regulations under the HEARTH Act. supporting the Federal preemption of interests in effective Tribal government,
With this approval, the Tribe is State law in the field of Indian leasing economic self-sufficiency, and territorial
authorized to enter into residential and the taxation of lease-related autonomy. See Michigan v. Bay Mills
leases without BIA approval. interests and activities applies with Indian Community, 134 S. Ct. 2024,
equal force to leases entered into under 2043 (2014) (Sotomayor, J., concurring)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tribal leasing regulations approved by (determining that ‘‘[a] key goal of the
Sharlene Round Face, Bureau of Indian the Federal government pursuant to the Federal Government is to render Tribes
Affairs, Division of Real Estate Services, HEARTH Act. more self-sufficient, and better
1849 C Street NW, MS–4642–MIB, Section 5 of the Indian Reorganization positioned to fund their own sovereign
Washington, DC 20240, at (202) 208– Act, 25 U.S.C. 465, preempts State and functions, rather than relying on Federal
3615. local taxation of permanent funding’’). The additional costs of State
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: improvements on trust land. and local taxation have a chilling effect
Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis on potential lessees, as well as on a
I. Summary of the HEARTH Act
Reservation v. Thurston County, 724 Tribe that, as a result, might refrain from
The HEARTH (Helping Expedite and F.3d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 2013) (citing exercising its own sovereign right to
Advance Responsible Tribal Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Jones, 411 impose a Tribal tax to support its
Homeownership) Act of 2012 (the Act) U.S. 145 (1973)). Similarly, section 465 infrastructure needs. See id. at 2043–44
makes a voluntary, alternative land preempts state taxation of rent payments (finding that State and local taxes
leasing process available to Tribes, by by a lessee for leased trust lands, greatly discourage Tribes from raising
amending the Indian Long-Term Leasing because ‘‘tax on the payment of rent is tax revenue from the same sources
Act of 1955, 25 U.S.C. 415. The Act indistinguishable from an impermissible because the imposition of double
authorizes Tribes to negotiate and enter tax on the land.’’ See Seminole Tribe of taxation would impede Tribal economic
into agricultural and business leases of Florida v. Stranburg, No. 14–14524, growth).
Tribal trust lands with a primary term *13–*17, n.8 (11th Cir. 2015). In Similar to BIA’s surface leasing
of 25 years, and up to two renewal terms addition, as explained in the preamble regulations, Tribal regulations under the
of 25 years each, without the approval to the revised leasing regulations at 25 HEARTH Act pervasively cover all
of the Secretary of the Interior. The Act CFR part 162, Federal courts have aspects of leasing. See 25 U.S.C.
also authorizes Tribes to enter into applied a balancing test to determine 415(h)(3)(B)(i) (requiring Tribal
leases for residential, recreational, whether State and local taxation of non- regulations be consistent with BIA
religious or educational purposes for a Indians on the reservation is preempted. surface leasing regulations).
primary term of up to 75 years without White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Furthermore, the Federal government
the approval of the Secretary. Bracker, 448 U.S. 136, 143 (1980). The remains involved in the Tribal land
Participating Tribes develop Tribal Bracker balancing test, which is leasing process by approving the Tribal
leasing regulations, including an conducted against a backdrop of leasing regulations in the first instance
environmental review process, and then ‘‘traditional notions of Indian self- and providing technical assistance,
must obtain the Secretary’s approval of government,’’ requires a particularized upon request by a Tribe, for the
those regulations prior to entering into examination of the relevant State, development of an environmental
leases. The Act requires the Secretary to Federal, and Tribal interests. We hereby review process. The Secretary also
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
approve Tribal regulations if the Tribal adopt the Bracker analysis from the retains authority to take any necessary
regulations are consistent with the preamble to the surface leasing actions to remedy violations of a lease
Department’s leasing regulations at 25 regulations, 77 FR at 72,447–48, as or of the Tribal regulations, including
CFR part 162 and provide for an supplemented by the analysis below. terminating the lease or rescinding
environmental review process that The strong Federal and Tribal approval of the Tribal regulations and
meets requirements set forth in the Act. interests against State and local taxation reassuming lease approval
This notice announces that the of improvements, leaseholds, and responsibilities. Moreover, the Secretary
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:30 Mar 27, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00076 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM 28MRN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_13355/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-11-01 08:56:23
Document Modified: 2018-11-01 08:56:23
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice. | |
| Contact | Ms. Sharlene Round Face, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Division of Real Estate Services, 1849 C Street NW, MS- 4642-MIB, Washington, DC 20240, at (202) 208-3615. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 13295 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR