83_FR_13365 83 FR 13305 - Certain IOT Devices and Components Thereof (IOT, The Internet of Things)-Web Applications Displayed on a Web Browser; Termination of Investigation

83 FR 13305 - Certain IOT Devices and Components Thereof (IOT, The Internet of Things)-Web Applications Displayed on a Web Browser; Termination of Investigation

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 60 (March 28, 2018)

Page Range13305-13306
FR Document2018-06220

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to review the presiding administrative law judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 10), which terminated the investigation for good cause on the basis of the imminent expiration of the asserted patent. On review, the Commission has determined to affirm the termination based upon the actual expiration of the asserted patent.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 60 (Wednesday, March 28, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 60 (Wednesday, March 28, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13305-13306]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-06220]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1094]


Certain IOT Devices and Components Thereof (IOT, The Internet of 
Things)--Web Applications Displayed on a Web Browser; Termination of 
Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined to review the presiding administrative law 
judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 10), which 
terminated the investigation for good cause on the basis of the 
imminent expiration of the asserted patent. On review, the Commission 
has determined to affirm the termination based upon the actual 
expiration of the asserted patent.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2532. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission

[[Page 13306]]

may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission TDD terminal on (202) 205-
1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on January 22, 2018, based upon an amended and supplemented complaint 
filed by Lakshmi Arunachalam, Ph.D. and WebXchange, Inc., both of Menlo 
Park, California. 83 FR 3021 (Jan. 22, 2018). The complaint alleged 
violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 
U.S.C. 1337), by a number of proposed respondents in the importation 
into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within 
the United States after importation of certain IOT devices and 
components thereof (IOT, the Internet of Things)--web applications 
displayed on a web browser by reason of infringement of certain claims 
of U.S. Patent No. 7,930,340 (``the '340 patent''), as well as unfair 
methods of competition and unfair acts (criminal and civil RICO 
violations, breach of contract, theft of intellectual property, 
antitrust violations, and trade secret misappropriation), the threat or 
effect of which is to destroy or substantially injure an industry in 
the United States. 83 FR at 3021. The Commission determined to 
institute the investigation only as to infringement of the '340 patent, 
and named as respondents Apple Inc. of Cupertino, California; Facebook, 
Inc. of Menlo Park, California; Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of 
Ridgefield Park, New Jersey; and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of 
Seoul, South Korea. Id. at 3022. The Office of Unfair Import 
Investigations (``OUII'') was also named as a party. Id.
    On January 29, 2018, the respondents moved to terminate the 
investigation based upon the then-imminent expiration of the '340 
patent. The complainants responded in opposition to the motion. The ALJ 
denied the motion for failure to comply with Commission rules. Order 
No. 8 at 2 & n.1 (Feb. 20, 2018). On February 21, 2018, the respondents 
filed a renewed motion to terminate, which corrected the omission in 
their previous motion. The complainants renewed their opposition to the 
motion. OUII supported the motion.
    On February 27, 2018, the ALJ granted the motion as an ID, finding 
that good cause exists for terminating the investigation. The ID finds 
that given ``the structure of section 337 investigations'' there was 
insufficient time for the Commission to ``reach a final determination 
or issue any relief before the March 5, 2018 expiration date'' of the 
'340 patent. Order No. 10 at 6.
    On March 5, 2018, the '340 patent expired. That same day, the 
complainants filed a ``Motion for Rehearing and Reinstating the 
Investigation'' (``Compl'ts Submission''). The Commission determined to 
treat that submission as a petition for Commission review of the ID 
under 19 CFR 210.43. The petition seeks an advisory ruling on certain 
issues. Compl'ts Submission 6.
    On March 12, 2018, the respondents and OUII filed responses in 
opposition to the complainants' submission. The responses explain, 
inter alia, that the complainants' submission does not provide an 
adequate basis for Commission review under Commission Rule 
210.43(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.43(b)(1). Resp'ts Resp. 3; OUII Resp. 1, 3.
    Having considered the record of the investigation, including the 
parties' submissions to the Commission, the Commission decides as 
follows. The Commission ``can issue only an exclusion order barring 
future importation or a cease and desist order barring future 
conduct,'' neither of which can issue as to an expired patent. Texas 
Instruments Inc. v. U.S. Int'l Trade Comm'n, 851 F.2d 342, 344 (Fed. 
Cir. 1988). Because the'340 patent has now actually expired, the ID's 
good cause (the imminent expiration of the patent) is now moot. 
Accordingly, the Commission has determined to review the ID, and, on 
review, to affirm the termination based upon the actual expiration of 
the '340 patent. The Commission declines the complainants' invitation 
to issue advisory rulings, and terminates the investigation.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: March 23, 2018.
Katherine M. Hiner,
Supervisory Attorney.
[FR Doc. 2018-06220 Filed 3-27-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P



                                                                           Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 28, 2018 / Notices                                                  13305

                                               notice of review. On February 1, 2018,                  International Trade Commission, 500 E                 express or implied, between Honeywell
                                               the parties each filed respective replies.              Street SW, Washington, DC 20436,                      and Code regarding the subject matter of
                                                  Having considered the record in this                 telephone (202) 205–2000. General                     this proceeding.’ ’’ See ID at 1 (citing
                                               investigation and the parties’                          information concerning the Commission                 Motion at 2). In addition, the ID ‘‘does
                                               submissions, the Commission finds that                  may also be obtained by accessing its                 not find any evidence’’ indicating that
                                               no violation of section 337 has occurred.               internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.             terminating the investigation would be
                                               The Commission (1) reverses the ID’s                    The public record for this investigation              ‘‘contrary’’ to the public interest. See ID
                                               finding on standing and finds that                      may be viewed on the Commission’s                     at 2 (citing Motion at 2; 19 CFR
                                               Andrea has standing to assert the ’345                  electronic docket (EDIS) at https://                  210.50(b)(2)). No petition for review of
                                               patent; (2) affirms, with additional                    edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired                      the ID was filed.
                                               reasoning, the ID’s finding of no                       persons are advised that information on                  The Commission has determined not
                                               domestic industry; and (3) takes no                     this matter can be obtained by                        to review the subject ID. The
                                               position on the remaining issues under                  contacting the Commission’s TDD                       investigation is terminated.
                                               review.                                                 terminal on (202) 205–1810.                              The authority for the Commission’s
                                                  The authority for the Commission’s                   SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The                        determination is contained in section
                                               determination is contained in section                   Commission instituted this investigation              337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
                                               337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as                       on June 27, 2017, based on a complaint                amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part
                                               amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in Part                    filed by Honeywell International, Inc. of             210 of the Commission’s Rules of
                                               210 of the Commission’s Rules of                        Morris Plains, New Jersey; Hand Held                  Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
                                               Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR part                     Products, Inc. d/b/a Honeywell                        210).
                                               210.                                                    Scanning & Mobility of Fort Mill, South                 By order of the Commission.
                                                 By order of the Commission.                           Carolina; Metrologic Instruments, Inc.                  Issued: March 22, 2018.
                                                 Issued: March 22, 2018.                               d/b/a Honeywell Scanning & Mobility of                Lisa R. Barton,
                                               Lisa R. Barton,                                         Fort Mill, South Carolina (collectively,              Secretary to the Commission.
                                               Secretary to the Commission.                            ‘‘Complainants’’ or ‘‘Honeywell’’). See               [FR Doc. 2018–06142 Filed 3–27–18; 8:45 am]
                                               [FR Doc. 2018–06158 Filed 3–27–18; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                       82 FR 29095–96 (June 27, 2017). The
                                                                                                                                                             BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
                                                                                                       complaint alleges violations of section
                                               BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
                                                                                                       337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
                                                                                                       amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), based upon                  INTERNATIONAL TRADE
                                               INTERNATIONAL TRADE                                     the importation into the United States,               COMMISSION
                                               COMMISSION                                              the sale for importation, and the sale
                                                                                                       within the United States after                        [Investigation No. 337–TA–1094]
                                               [Investigation No. 337–TA–1061]                         importation of certain bar code readers,
                                                                                                                                                             Certain IOT Devices and Components
                                                                                                       scan engines, products containing the
                                               Certain Bar Code Readers, Scan                                                                                Thereof (IOT, The Internet of Things)—
                                                                                                       same, and components thereof by reason
                                               Engines, Products Containing the                                                                              Web Applications Displayed on a Web
                                                                                                       of infringement of certain claims of U.S.
                                               Same, and Components Thereof;                                                                                 Browser; Termination of Investigation
                                                                                                       Patent No. 6,832,725; U.S. Patent No.
                                               Commission Decision Not To Review
                                                                                                       8,511,572; U.S. Patent No. 7,148,923;                 AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
                                               an Initial Determination Granting an
                                                                                                       U.S. Patent No. 7,527,206; U.S. Patent                Commission.
                                               Amended Joint Motion To Terminate
                                                                                                       No. 8,646,692; and U.S. Patent No.                    ACTION: Notice.
                                               the Investigation Based on a License
                                                                                                       9,323,969. See id. The notice of
                                               and Settlement Agreement;                                                                                     SUMMARY:    Notice is hereby given that
                                                                                                       investigation names The Code
                                               Termination of the Investigation                                                                              the U.S. International Trade
                                                                                                       Corporation (‘‘Code’’) of Draper, Utah
                                               AGENCY: U.S. International Trade                        and Cortex Pte Ltd. (‘‘Cortex’’) of                   Commission has determined to review
                                               Commission.                                             Singapore as respondents in this                      the presiding administrative law judge’s
                                               ACTION: Notice.                                         investigation. See id. The Office of                  (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
                                                                                                       Unfair Import Investigations is not a                 (Order No. 10), which terminated the
                                               SUMMARY:   Notice is hereby given that                  party to this investigation. See id.                  investigation for good cause on the basis
                                               the U.S. International Trade                               On December 8, 2017, the ALJ issued                of the imminent expiration of the
                                               Commission has determined not to                        an initial determination partially                    asserted patent. On review, the
                                               review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)                terminating the investigation as to                   Commission has determined to affirm
                                               (Order No. 22) of the presiding                         Cortex as a respondent. See Order No.                 the termination based upon the actual
                                               administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’)                      12, unreviewed, Comm’n Notice (Jan. 8,                expiration of the asserted patent.
                                               granting an amended joint motion to                     2018).                                                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                               terminate the investigation based on a                     On February 21, 2018, Honeywell and                Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the
                                               license and settlement agreement. The                   Code filed an amended joint motion to                 General Counsel, U.S. International
                                               investigation is terminated.                            terminate the investigation based on a                Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
                                               FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                        license and settlement agreement                      Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
                                               Houda Morad, Office of the General                      (Motion). On the same day, the ALJ                    708–2532. Copies of non-confidential
                                               Counsel, U.S. International Trade                       issued the subject ID (Order No. 22)                  documents filed in connection with this
                                               Commission, 500 E Street SW,                            granting the Motion and terminating the               investigation are or will be available for
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES




                                               Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)                   investigation. The ID finds that: ‘‘[t]he             inspection during official business
                                               708–4716. Copies of non-confidential                    [Motion] complies with the Commission                 hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
                                               documents filed in connection with this                 Rules . . . .’’ See ID at 1. In particular,           Office of the Secretary, U.S.
                                               investigation are or will be available for              the ID notes that ‘‘[p]ursuant to                     International Trade Commission, 500 E
                                               inspection during official business                     Commission Rule 210.21(b)(1)[, 19 CFR                 Street SW, Washington, DC 20436,
                                               hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the                   210.21(b)(1)], the movants state: ‘There              telephone (202) 205–2000. General
                                               Office of the Secretary, U.S.                           are no other agreements, written or oral,             information concerning the Commission


                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014   20:30 Mar 27, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00084   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM   28MRN1


                                               13306                       Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 28, 2018 / Notices

                                               may also be obtained by accessing its                   cause exists for terminating the                      JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE
                                               internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.               investigation. The ID finds that given                UNITED STATES
                                               The public record for this investigation                ‘‘the structure of section 337
                                               may be viewed on the Commission’s                       investigations’’ there was insufficient               Meeting of The Judicial Conference;
                                               electronic docket (EDIS) at https://                    time for the Commission to ‘‘reach a                  Committee on Rules of Practice and
                                               edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired                        final determination or issue any relief               Procedure
                                               persons are advised that information on                 before the March 5, 2018 expiration                   AGENCY:  Judicial Conference of the
                                               this matter can be obtained by                          date’’ of the ’340 patent. Order No. 10               United States, Committee on Rules of
                                               contacting the Commission TDD                           at 6.                                                 Practice and Procedure.
                                               terminal on (202) 205–1810.
                                                                                                          On March 5, 2018, the ’340 patent                  ACTION: Notice of open meeting.
                                               SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
                                                                                                       expired. That same day, the
                                               Commission instituted this investigation                                                                      SUMMARY:    The Committee on Rules of
                                                                                                       complainants filed a ‘‘Motion for
                                               on January 22, 2018, based upon an                                                                            Practice and Procedure will hold a
                                               amended and supplemented complaint                      Rehearing and Reinstating the
                                                                                                                                                             meeting on June 12, 2018. The meeting
                                               filed by Lakshmi Arunachalam, Ph.D.                     Investigation’’ (‘‘Compl’ts Submission’’).
                                                                                                                                                             will be open to public observation but
                                               and WebXchange, Inc., both of Menlo                     The Commission determined to treat
                                                                                                                                                             not participation. An agenda and
                                               Park, California. 83 FR 3021 (Jan. 22,                  that submission as a petition for                     supporting materials will be posted at
                                               2018). The complaint alleged violations                 Commission review of the ID under 19                  least 7 days in advance of the meeting
                                               of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930,               CFR 210.43. The petition seeks an                     at: http://www.uscourts.gov/rules-
                                               as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), by a                       advisory ruling on certain issues.                    policies/records-and-archives-rules-
                                               number of proposed respondents in the                   Compl’ts Submission 6.                                committees/agenda-books.
                                               importation into the United States, the                    On March 12, 2018, the respondents                 DATES: June 12, 2018.
                                               sale for importation, or the sale within                and OUII filed responses in opposition                   Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
                                               the United States after importation of                  to the complainants’ submission. The                  ADDRESSES: Thurgood Marshall Federal
                                               certain IOT devices and components                      responses explain, inter alia, that the               Judiciary Building, Mecham Conference
                                               thereof (IOT, the Internet of Things)—                  complainants’ submission does not                     Center, Administrative Office of the
                                               web applications displayed on a web                     provide an adequate basis for                         United States Courts, One Columbus
                                               browser by reason of infringement of                    Commission review under Commission                    Circle NE, Washington, DC 20544.
                                               certain claims of U.S. Patent No.                       Rule 210.43(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.43(b)(1).               FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                               7,930,340 (‘‘the ’340 patent’’), as well as             Resp’ts Resp. 3; OUII Resp. 1, 3.
                                               unfair methods of competition and                                                                             Rebecca A. Womeldorf, Rules
                                               unfair acts (criminal and civil RICO                       Having considered the record of the                Committee Secretary, Rules Committee
                                               violations, breach of contract, theft of                investigation, including the parties’                 Staff, Administrative Office of the
                                               intellectual property, antitrust                        submissions to the Commission, the                    United States Courts, Washington, DC
                                               violations, and trade secret                            Commission decides as follows. The                    20544, telephone (202) 502–1820.
                                               misappropriation), the threat or effect of              Commission ‘‘can issue only an                          Dated: March 22, 2018.
                                               which is to destroy or substantially                    exclusion order barring future                        Rebecca A. Womeldorf,
                                               injure an industry in the United States.                importation or a cease and desist order               Rules Committee Secretary.
                                               83 FR at 3021. The Commission                           barring future conduct,’’ neither of                  [FR Doc. 2018–06157 Filed 3–27–18; 8:45 am]
                                               determined to institute the investigation               which can issue as to an expired patent.              BILLING CODE 2210–55–P
                                               only as to infringement of the ’340                     Texas Instruments Inc. v. U.S. Int’l
                                               patent, and named as respondents                        Trade Comm’n, 851 F.2d 342, 344 (Fed.
                                               Apple Inc. of Cupertino, California;                    Cir. 1988). Because the’340 patent has                DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
                                               Facebook, Inc. of Menlo Park,                           now actually expired, the ID’s good
                                               California; Samsung Electronics                         cause (the imminent expiration of the                 [CPCLO Order No. 004–2018]
                                               America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New                   patent) is now moot. Accordingly, the
                                               Jersey; and Samsung Electronics Co.,                                                                          Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of
                                                                                                       Commission has determined to review
                                               Ltd. of Seoul, South Korea. Id. at 3022.                                                                      Records
                                                                                                       the ID, and, on review, to affirm the
                                               The Office of Unfair Import                             termination based upon the actual                     AGENCY:  National Institute of Justice,
                                               Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) was also named                expiration of the ’340 patent. The                    Office of Justice Programs, United States
                                               as a party. Id.                                         Commission declines the complainants’                 Department of Justice.
                                                  On January 29, 2018, the respondents                 invitation to issue advisory rulings, and             ACTION: Notice of a new system of
                                               moved to terminate the investigation                    terminates the investigation.                         records.
                                               based upon the then-imminent
                                               expiration of the ’340 patent. The                         The authority for the Commission’s                 SUMMARY:   Pursuant to the Privacy Act of
                                               complainants responded in opposition                    determination is contained in section                 1974 and Office of Management and
                                               to the motion. The ALJ denied the                       337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as                     Budget (OMB) Circular No. A–108,
                                               motion for failure to comply with                       amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part                 notice is hereby given that the Office of
                                               Commission rules. Order No. 8 at 2 &                    210 of the Commission’s Rules of                      Justice Programs (hereinafter OJP), a
                                               n.1 (Feb. 20, 2018). On February 21,                    Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part                   component within the United States
                                               2018, the respondents filed a renewed                   210).                                                 Department of Justice (DOJ or
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES




                                               motion to terminate, which corrected                      By order of the Commission.                         Department), proposes to develop a new
                                               the omission in their previous motion.                    Issued: March 23, 2018.                             system of records titled National
                                               The complainants renewed their                                                                                Missing and Unidentified Persons
                                                                                                       Katherine M. Hiner,
                                               opposition to the motion. OUII                                                                                System, JUSTICE/OJP—015. The OJP
                                               supported the motion.                                   Supervisory Attorney.                                 proposes to establish this system of
                                                  On February 27, 2018, the ALJ granted                [FR Doc. 2018–06220 Filed 3–27–18; 8:45 am]           records to improve the quantity and
                                               the motion as an ID, finding that good                  BILLING CODE 7020–02–P                                quality of—and appropriate access to—


                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014   20:30 Mar 27, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00085   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM   28MRN1



Document Created: 2018-11-01 08:56:09
Document Modified: 2018-11-01 08:56:09
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice.
ContactSidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2532. Copies of non- confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https:// www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission TDD terminal on (202) 205- 1810.
FR Citation83 FR 13305 

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR