83 FR 13703 - Airworthiness Directives; General Electric Company Turbofan Engines
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 62 (March 30, 2018)
Federal Aviation Administration
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 62 (March 30, 2018)
| Page Range | 13703-13706 | |
| FR Document | 2018-06390 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 62 (Friday, March 30, 2018)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 13703-13706] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-06390] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-2017-0792; Product Identifier 2017-NE-28-AD] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; General Electric Company Turbofan Engines AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM); reopening of comment period. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: We are revising an earlier proposal for certain General Electric Company (GE) CF6-80A, CF6-80A1, CF6-80A2, CF6-80A3, CF6- 80C2A1, CF6-80C2A2, CF6-80C2A3, CF6-80C2A5, CF6-80C2A5F, CF6-80C2A8, CF6-80C2B1, CF6-80C2B1F, CF6-80C2B2, CF6-80C2B2F, CF6-80C2B4, CF6- 80C2B4F, CF6-80C2B5F, CF6-80C2B6, CF6-80C2B6F, CF6-80C2B6FA, CF6- 80C2B7F, CF6-80C2D1F, CF6-80C2L1F, and CF6-80C2K1F turbofan engines. This action revises the notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) by removing certain engine models and adding a new part number (P/N) to the applicability and by revising the references to the service information. We are proposing this airworthiness directive (AD) to address the unsafe condition on these products. Since these actions would impose an additional burden over those in the NPRM, we are reopening the comment period to allow the public the chance to comment on these changes. DATES: The comment period for the NPRM published in the Federal [[Page 13704]] Register on September 7, 2017 (82 FR 42261) is reopened. We must receive comments on this SNPRM by May 14, 2018. ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Fax: 202-493-2251. Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. For service information identified in this SNPRM, contact General Electric Company, GE Aviation, Room 285, 1 Neumann Way, Cincinnati, OH 45215; phone: 513-552-3272; email: [email protected]. You may view this service information at the FAA, Engine and Propeller Standards Branch, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 781-238-7759. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017- 0792; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this SNPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for Docket Operations (phone: 800-647- 5527) is listed above. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Herman Mak, Aerospace Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Ave., Burlington, MA 01803; phone: 781-238- 7147; fax: 781-238-7199; email: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments Invited We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2017-0792; Product Identifier 2017-NE-28-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this SNPRM. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this SNPRM because of those comments. We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive about this SNPRM. Discussion We issued an NPRM to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to GE turbofan engines, models CF6-80A, CF6-80A1, CF6-80A2, CF6-80A3, CF6-80C2A1, CF6-80C2A2, CF6-80C2A3, CF6-80C2A5, CF6-80C2A5F, CF6-80C2A8, CF6-80C2B1, CF6-80C2B1F, CF6-80C2B1F1, CF6-80C2B1F2, CF6- 80C2B2, CF6-80C2B2F, CF6-80C2B3F, CF6-80C2B4, CF6-80C2B4F, CF6-80C2B5F, CF6-80C2B6, CF6-80C2B6F, CF6-80C2B6FA, CF6-80C2B7F, CF6-80C2B8F, CF6- 80C2D1F, CF6-80C2L1F, and CF6-80C2K1F with high-pressure turbine (HPT) disks with part numbers and serial numbers (S/Ns) listed in Table 1 and 2 of Appendix A in GE Service Bulletin (SB) CF6-80C2 S/B 72-1562, Revision 01, dated July 28, 2017. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on September 7, 2017 (82 FR 42261). The NPRM was prompted by an uncontained failure of an HPT stage 2 disk that resulted in a fire. The NPRM proposed to require ultrasonic inspection (UI) of HPT stage 1 and 2 disks. Actions Since the NPRM Was Issued Since we issued the NPRM, we determined the need to remove certain engine models and to add a new part number to the applicability of this AD. We determined the need to revise references to the service information in this AD because, since the publication of the NPRM, GE published the list of affected HPT S/Ns in two separate SBs applicable to the CF6-80A and CF6-80C2 engines. Comments We gave the public the opportunity to comment on the NPRM. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment. Request To Change Definition MTU Maintenance Hannover, Lufthansa Technik AG, and GE requested modification of the definition of ``piece part exposure.'' They reasoned a modification of the definition would prevent unintended inspections on disks. We agree. Modification of the definition of ``piece part exposure'' will clarify the intent of when the inspections are to be accomplished. We changed the Definition paragraph in this AD to clarify that ``piece- part exposure'' involves separation of the HPT disk from its mating rotor parts. Request To Clarify the Unsafe Condition The Boeing Company (Boeing) and GE requested we add wording identifying the HPT stage 1 or HPT stage 2 disk, as appropriate, with the associated CF6-80A and CF6-80C2 engine models in the unsafe condition paragraph of this AD. These commenters requested the change to provide clarification and avoid confusion. We agree. We changed the Unsafe Condition paragraph in this AD as requested by the commenters. Request To Remove Engines Models From Applicability Boeing and GE requested we modify the applicability of this AD by removing certain GE engine models. GE commented that the affected HPT disks are not certified for use in the GE CF6-80C2B8F engine model and, therefore, this model should be removed from the AD. Boeing commented that GE CF6-80C2B3F, CF6-80C2L1F and CF6-80C2K1F engine models are not part of the Boeing 767/747 type certificate data sheet (TCDS) and, therefore, these models should be removed from the AD. In addition, we learned from discussions with GE that GE CF6- 80C2B1F1 and CF6-80C2B1F2 engine models have never been produced and therefore should be removed from this AD. We partially agree. We disagree with removing GE CF6-80C2L1F and CF6-80C2K1F engine models from applicability. These models are present on the engine TCDS. Further, the applicable HPT disks are eligible for installation on GE engine models CF6-80C2L1F and CF6-80C2K1F and these engine models may be exposed to the applicable HPT disks during an engine overhaul. We agree with removing the GE CF6-80C2B1F1, CF6-80C2B1F2, CF6- 80C2B3F, and CF6-80C2B8F engine models from the applicability section of this AD because these engine models were never produced or the applicable HPT disks in this AD are not eligible for installation in these engine models. We [[Page 13705]] removed the GE CF6-80C2B1F1, CF6-80C2B1F2, CF6-80C2B3F, and CF6-80C2B8F engine models from this AD. Revision to Part Numbers in Applicability GE further commented that it had added HPT Stage 1 disk P/N 2047M32G06 to the Effectivity paragraph of the GE SB CF6-80C2 S/B 72- 1562. This is a field rework part number that is created from P/N 1531M84G08 and the serial number is not changed by the re-work procedure. GE noted that operators could have re-worked one or more of affected HPT disks, P/N 1531M84G08, into HPT disks, P/N 2047M32G06. Therefore, GE added this P/N to the SB. We considered this comment and determined the need to add P/N 2047M32G06 to the applicability of this AD. We are issuing this SNPRM to allow the public the opportunity to comment on this change. Request To Change Service Information Boeing, Delta Air Lines, and GE requested inclusion of GE SB CF6- 80A SB 72-0869 R01, dated October 19, 2017, in the applicability section of this AD. We agree. Since the publication of the NPRM, GE has published the list of affected HPT S/Ns in two SBs applicable to the CF6-80A and CF6- 80C2 engine models. We are issuing this SNPRM to allow the public the opportunity to comment on this change. Request To Change Service Information Delta Air Lines and GE requested an update to the latest revision of GE CF6-80C2 SB 72-1562. We agree. We revised the reference to GE CF6-80C2 SB 72-1562 to include Revision 3, dated January 10, 2018. We are issuing this SNPRM to allow the public the opportunity to comment on this change. Request To Change Costs of Compliance FedEx Express requested revising the Costs of Compliance paragraph to provide a better estimate of costs associated with the HPT stage 1 and 2 disk inspections as well as to account for repetitive inspections. FedEx Express commented that the ``Estimated Costs'' table in the NPRM indicates 10 work-hours to perform the UI of each HPT disk. FedEx Express commented that this calculation does not appear to consider an engine with both a Stage 1 and a Stage 2 HPT Disk affected by GE SB 72-1562. FedEx Express indicated that it has learned from GE that 10 work-hours is the expected inspection time per disk (either Stage 1 or Stage 2), not per engine. Therefore, an inspection of engines with two affected disks would require 20 work-hours per shop visit. Further, this cost estimate only takes into account the initial inspection and does not reflect that the proposed action is to be performed at every ``piece-part exposure.'' We disagree. Our estimate in the NPRM was based on an estimated population of 640 installed disks. Therefore, our labor estimate of 10 hours per disk and our total cost estimate remain accurate. We only account for initial inspections in our cost estimates. Repetitive inspection costs are not included. We, however, did change the Cost of Compliance section of this AD to provide better clarification. Support for the NPRM The National Transportation Safety Board and Air Line Pilots Association supported the NPRM. Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51 We reviewed GE CF6-80C2 SB 72-1562 R03, dated January 10, 2018. The SB describes procedures for UI of HPT stage 1 and 2 disks. We also reviewed GE CF6-80A SB 72-0869 R01, dated October 19, 2017. The SB describes procedures for UI of HPT stage 2 disks. This SB information is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section. FAA's Determination We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design. Certain changes described above expand the scope of the NPRM. As a result, we have determined that it is necessary to reopen the comment period to provide additional opportunity for the public to comment on this SNPRM. Proposed Requirements of This SNPRM This SNPRM would require accomplishing the actions specified in the service information described previously. Costs of Compliance We estimate that this proposed AD affects 640 HPT disks on engines installed on airplanes of U.S. registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD: Estimated Costs ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cost per Cost on U.S. Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- UI of HPT disk........................ 10 work-hours x $85 per $0 $850 $544,000 hour = $850. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the authority to issue ADs applicable to engines, propellers, and associated appliances to the Manager, Engine and Propeller Standards Branch, Policy and Innovation Division. [[Page 13706]] Regulatory Findings We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. The Proposed Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 0 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. Sec. 39.13 [Amended] 0 2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD): General Electric Company: Docket No. FAA-2017-0792; Product Identifier 2017-NE-28-AD. (a) Comments Due Date We must receive comments by May 14, 2018. (b) Affected ADs None. (c) Applicability This AD applies to General Electric Company (GE) CF6-80A, CF6- 80A1, CF6-80A2, CF6-80A3, CF6-80C2A1, CF6-80C2A2, CF6-80C2A3, CF6- 80C2A5, CF6-80C2A5F, CF6-80C2A8, CF6-80C2B1, CF6-80C2B1F, CF6- 80C2B2, CF6-80C2B2F, CF6-80C2B4, CF6-80C2B4F, CF6-80C2B5F, CF6- 80C2B6, CF6-80C2B6F, CF6-80C2B6FA, CF6-80C2B7F, CF6-80C2D1F, CF6- 80C2L1F, and CF6-80C2K1F turbofan engines with high-pressure turbine (HPT) disks with serial numbers listed in Table 1 and 2 of Appendix A in GE CF6-80C2 Service Bulletin (SB) 72-1562 R03, dated January 10, 2018; and Table 1 of Appendix A in GE CF6-80A SB 72-0869 R01, dated October 19, 2017. (d) Subject Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code 7250, Turbine/ Turboprop Engine--Turbine Section. (e) Unsafe Condition This AD was prompted by an uncontained failure of an HPT stage 2 disk. We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of the HPT Stage 1 disk (CF6-80C2) and the HPT Stage 2 disk (CF6-80C2 and CF6-80A). The unsafe condition, if not addressed, could result in an uncontained HPT disk release, damage to the engine, and damage to the airplane. (f) Compliance Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done. (g) Required Actions After the effective date of this AD, perform an ultrasonic inspection (UI) for cracks in stage 1 and stage 2 HPT disks on the CF6-80C2 engine model and in stage 2 HPT disks on the CF6-80A engine model at each piece-part level exposure in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph 3.A.(2), in GE CF6-80C2 SB 72-1562 R03, dated January 10, 2018, or the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph 3.A.(2) in GE CF6-80A SB 72-0869 R01, dated October 19, 2017, as applicable to the engine model. (h) Non-Required Actions The reporting requirements specified in the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraphs 3.A.(2)(c) and 3.A.(2)(f), of GE CF6-80C2 SB 72-1562 R03, dated January 10, 2018, are not required by this AD. (i) Definition For the purpose of this AD, ``piece-part exposure'' of the stage 1 or stage 2 HPT disk is separation of that HPT disk from its mating rotor parts within the HPT rotor module (thermal shield and HPT stage 1 and stage 2 disk respectively). (j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) (1) The Manager, ECO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the certification office send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (j) of this AD. You may email your request to: [email protected]. (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding district office. (k) Related Information (1) For more information about this AD, contact Herman Mak, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, ECO Branch, Compliance and Airworthiness Division, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone: 781- 238-7147; fax: 781-238-7199; email: [email protected]. (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact General Electric Company, GE Aviation, Room 285, 1 Neumann Way, Cincinnati, OH 45215; phone: 513-552-3272; email: [email protected]. You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Engine and Propeller Standards Branch, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 781-238-7759. Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on March 23, 2018. Robert J. Ganley, Manager, Engine and Propeller Standards Branch, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2018-06390 Filed 3-29-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 62 / Friday, March 30, 2018 / Proposed Rules 13703
After review and deliberation, the Board and interested persons are invited to (d) For peanuts placed under a
unanimously recommended revising the participate and express their views. marketing assistance loan with the
basis for assessment under the program AMS has performed this initial RFA Department’s Commodity Credit
from value to volume as described regarding the impact of this proposed Corporation, the Commodity Credit
herein. action on small entities and invites Corporation, or any entity determined
To calculate the percentage of comments concerning potential effects by the Commodity Credit Corporation
producer revenue represented by the of this action. shall deduct and remit to the Board,
assessment rate, the proposed USDA has determined that this from the proceeds of the loan paid to the
assessment rates are divided by the proposed rule is consistent with and producer, the assessment per ton as
average producer price. The proposed would effectuate the purposes of the specified in paragraph (c) of this
assessment rates are $3.55 per ton 1996 Act. section, no more than 60 days after the
($0.001775 per pound) for Segregation 1 A 30-day comment period is provided last day of the month in which the
peanuts and $1.25 per ton ($0.000625 to allow interested persons to respond peanuts were placed under a marketing
per pound) for Segregation 2 and 3 to this proposal. Thirty days is deemed assistance loan.
peanuts. According to NASS, the appropriate because this action would * * * * *
average producer price ranged from need to be completed by the spring of
Dated: March 23, 2018.
$0.193 per pound in 2015 to $0.189 per 2018 so that USDA would have
sufficient time to code the assessment Bruce Summers,
pound in 2016.17 Thus, the proposed
rates into its computer system to Acting Administrator.
assessment rates as a percentage of
administer its loan program. (USDA [FR Doc. 2018–06283 Filed 3–29–18; 8:45 am]
producer price could range from 0.92 to
0.94 percent for Segregation 1 peanuts collects the assessments for peanuts BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
and from 0.32 to 0.33 percent for placed under loan by producers and
Segregation 2 and 3 peanuts. remits the assessments to the Board.) All
In accordance with the Paperwork written comments received in response DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. to this proposed rule will be considered
Chapter 35), the information collection prior to finalizing this action. Federal Aviation Administration
and recordkeeping requirements that are List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1216
imposed by the program have been 14 CFR Part 39
approved previously under OMB Administrative practice and [Docket No. FAA–2017–0792; Product
control number 0581–0093. This procedure, Advertising, Consumer Identifier 2017–NE–28–AD]
proposed rule would not result in a information, Marketing agreements,
Peanut promotion, Reporting and RIN 2120–AA64
change to the information collection and
recordkeeping requirements previously recordkeeping requirements. Airworthiness Directives; General
approved and would impose no For the reasons set forth in the Electric Company Turbofan Engines
additional reporting and recordkeeping preamble, 7 CFR part 1216 is proposed
burden on peanut producers or first to be amended as follows: AGENCY: Federal Aviation
handlers. Administration (FAA), DOT.
As with all Federal promotion PART 1216—PEANUT PROMOTION, ACTION: Supplemental notice of
programs, reports and forms are RESEARCH, AND INFORMATION proposed rulemaking (SNPRM);
periodically reviewed to reduce ORDER reopening of comment period.
information requirements and ■ 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR SUMMARY: We are revising an earlier
duplication by industry and public part 1216 continues to read as follows: proposal for certain General Electric
sector agencies. Finally, USDA has not Company (GE) CF6–80A, CF6–80A1,
identified any relevant Federal rules Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7411–7425; 7 U.S.C.
7401. CF6–80A2, CF6–80A3, CF6–80C2A1,
that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with CF6–80C2A2, CF6–80C2A3, CF6–
this proposed rule. ■ 2. Revise § 1216.11 to read as follows: 80C2A5, CF6–80C2A5F, CF6–80C2A8,
AMS is committed to complying with CF6–80C2B1, CF6–80C2B1F, CF6–
§ 1216.11 Fiscal year.
the E-Government Act, to promote the 80C2B2, CF6–80C2B2F, CF6–80C2B4,
use of the internet and other Fiscal year means the 12-month
period beginning with November 1 of CF6–80C2B4F, CF6–80C2B5F, CF6–
information technologies to provide 80C2B6, CF6–80C2B6F, CF6–
increased opportunities for citizen any year and ending with October 31 of
the following year, or such other period 80C2B6FA, CF6–80C2B7F, CF6–
access to Government information and 80C2D1F, CF6–80C2L1F, and CF6–
services, and for other purposes. as determined by the Board and
approved by the Secretary. 80C2K1F turbofan engines. This action
In regard to outreach efforts, Board revises the notice of proposed
■ 3. In § 1261.51, revise paragraphs (c)
members have been conducting rulemaking (NPRM) by removing certain
outreach to educate industry members and (d), remove paragraph (e), and
redesignate paragraphs (f) through (j) as engine models and adding a new part
about the need for changing the basis of number (P/N) to the applicability and by
assessment since January 2016. The paragraphs (e) through (i) to read as
follows: revising the references to the service
issue has been discussed at Board information. We are proposing this
meetings over the past few years. The § 1216.51 Assessments. airworthiness directive (AD) to address
Board has also conducted outreach to the unsafe condition on these products.
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS
* * * * *
the major peanut associations and has (c) Such assessments shall be levied Since these actions would impose an
received positive feedback. All of the on all farmers stock peanuts sold at a additional burden over those in the
Board’s meetings are open to the public rate of $3.55 per ton for Segregation 1 NPRM, we are reopening the comment
peanuts and $1.25 per ton for period to allow the public the chance to
17 USDA, Crop Values Summary 2016, February
Segregation 2 peanuts and 3 peanuts, as comment on these changes.
2017, p. 27; http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/
nass/CropValuSu//2010s/2017/CropValuSu-02-24- those terms are defined in § 996.13(b)– DATES: The comment period for the
2017_revision.pdf. (d) of this title. NPRM published in the Federal
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:11 Mar 29, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30MRP1.SGM 30MRP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_13765/page/1.svg)
![13706 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 62 / Friday, March 30, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Regulatory Findings engines with high-pressure turbine (HPT) (k) Related Information
disks with serial numbers listed in Table 1 (1) For more information about this AD,
We determined that this proposed AD and 2 of Appendix A in GE CF6–80C2
would not have federalism implications contact Herman Mak, Aerospace Engineer,
Service Bulletin (SB) 72–1562 R03, dated FAA, ECO Branch, Compliance and
under Executive Order 13132. This January 10, 2018; and Table 1 of Appendix Airworthiness Division, 1200 District
proposed AD would not have a A in GE CF6–80A SB 72–0869 R01, dated Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone: 781–
substantial direct effect on the States, on October 19, 2017. 238–7147; fax: 781–238–7199; email:
the relationship between the national (d) Subject herman.mak@faa.gov.
Government and the States, or on the (2) For service information identified in
distribution of power and Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) this AD, contact General Electric Company,
Code 7250, Turbine/Turboprop Engine— GE Aviation, Room 285, 1 Neumann Way,
responsibilities among the various
Turbine Section. Cincinnati, OH 45215; phone: 513–552–3272;
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I (e) Unsafe Condition email: aviation.fleetsupport@ge.com. You
certify this proposed regulation: may view this referenced service information
This AD was prompted by an uncontained at the FAA, Engine and Propeller Standards
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory failure of an HPT stage 2 disk. We are issuing Branch, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington,
action’’ under Executive Order 12866, this AD to prevent failure of the HPT Stage MA 01803. For information on the
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 1 disk (CF6–80C2) and the HPT Stage 2 disk availability of this material at the FAA, call
the DOT Regulatory Policies and (CF6–80C2 and CF6–80A). The unsafe 781–238–7759.
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, condition, if not addressed, could result in an
uncontained HPT disk release, damage to the Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
1979), March 23, 2018.
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation engine, and damage to the airplane.
Robert J. Ganley,
in Alaska, and (f) Compliance
(4) Will not have a significant Manager, Engine and Propeller Standards
Comply with this AD within the Branch, Aircraft Certification Service.
economic impact, positive or negative, compliance times specified, unless already
on a substantial number of small entities [FR Doc. 2018–06390 Filed 3–29–18; 8:45 am]
done.
under the criteria of the Regulatory BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
(g) Required Actions
Flexibility Act.
After the effective date of this AD, perform
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 an ultrasonic inspection (UI) for cracks in DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation stage 1 and stage 2 HPT disks on the CF6–
safety, Incorporation by reference, 80C2 engine model and in stage 2 HPT disks Federal Aviation Administration
Safety. on the CF6–80A engine model at each piece-
part level exposure in accordance with the 14 CFR Part 39
The Proposed Amendment Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph
3.A.(2), in GE CF6–80C2 SB 72–1562 R03, [Docket No. FAA–2017–0682; Product
Accordingly, under the authority dated January 10, 2018, or the Identifier 2017–SW–028–AD]
delegated to me by the Administrator, Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph RIN 2120–AA64
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 3.A.(2) in GE CF6–80A SB 72–0869 R01,
39 as follows: dated October 19, 2017, as applicable to the Airworthiness Directives; Robinson
engine model. Helicopter Company Helicopters
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES (h) Non-Required Actions
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
The reporting requirements specified in the Administration (FAA), DOT.
■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 Accomplishment Instructions, paragraphs
continues to read as follows: 3.A.(2)(c) and 3.A.(2)(f), of GE CF6–80C2 SB ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
72–1562 R03, dated January 10, 2018, are not (NPRM).
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
required by this AD.
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
§ 39.13 [Amended] (i) Definition airworthiness directive (AD) for
■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding For the purpose of this AD, ‘‘piece-part Robinson Helicopter Company
the following new airworthiness exposure’’ of the stage 1 or stage 2 HPT disk (Robinson) Model R66 helicopters. This
directive (AD): is separation of that HPT disk from its mating proposed AD would require replacing
General Electric Company: Docket No. FAA– rotor parts within the HPT rotor module the tail rotor drive shaft yoke assembly
2017–0792; Product Identifier 2017–NE– (thermal shield and HPT stage 1 and stage 2 and inspecting for sealant. This
28–AD. disk respectively).
proposed AD is prompted by reports of
(a) Comments Due Date (j) Alternative Methods of Compliance tail rotor driveshaft failures. The actions
(AMOCs) of this proposed AD are intended to
We must receive comments by May 14,
2018. (1) The Manager, ECO Branch, FAA, has correct an unsafe condition on these
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, products.
(b) Affected ADs if requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, DATES: We must receive comments on
None.
send your request to your principal inspector this proposed AD by May 29, 2018.
(c) Applicability or local Flight Standards District Office, as ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
This AD applies to General Electric appropriate. If sending information directly any of the following methods:
Company (GE) CF6–80A, CF6–80A1, CF6– to the manager of the certification office send • Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS
80A2, CF6–80A3, CF6–80C2A1, CF6– it to the attention of the person identified in http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
80C2A2, CF6–80C2A3, CF6–80C2A5, CF6– paragraph (j) of this AD. You may email your
online instructions for sending your
80C2A5F, CF6–80C2A8, CF6–80C2B1, CF6– request to: ANE-AD-AMOC@faa.gov.
80C2B1F, CF6–80C2B2, CF6–80C2B2F, CF6– (2) Before using any approved AMOC, comments electronically.
80C2B4, CF6–80C2B4F, CF6–80C2B5F, CF6– notify your appropriate principal inspector, • Fax: 202–493–2251.
80C2B6, CF6–80C2B6F, CF6–80C2B6FA, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager • Mail: Send comments to the U.S.
CF6–80C2B7F, CF6–80C2D1F, CF6– of the local flight standards district office/ Department of Transportation, Docket
80C2L1F, and CF6–80C2K1F turbofan certificate holding district office. Operations, M–30, West Building
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:11 Mar 29, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30MRP1.SGM 30MRP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_13765/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2018-11-01 08:58:24
Document Modified: 2018-11-01 08:58:24
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM); reopening of comment period. | |
| Dates | The comment period for the NPRM published in the Federal Register on September 7, 2017 (82 FR 42261) is reopened. | |
| Contact | Herman Mak, Aerospace Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Ave., Burlington, MA 01803; phone: 781-238- 7147; fax: 781-238-7199; email: [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 13703 | |
| RIN Number | 2120-AA64 | |
| CFR Associated | Air Transportation; Aircraft; Aviation Safety; Incorporation by Reference and Safety |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR