83 FR 13710 - Air Plan Approval; Michigan; Revisions to Volatile Organic Compound Rules
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 62 (March 30, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 62 (March 30, 2018)
| Page Range | 13710-13712 | |
| FR Document | 2018-06543 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 62 (Friday, March 30, 2018)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 13710-13712] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-06543] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R05-OAR-2017-0100; EPA-R05-OAR-2017-0501; FRL-9976-10--Region 5] Air Plan Approval; Michigan; Revisions to Volatile Organic Compound Rules AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve revised rules submitted by the State of Michigan as State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions. The main revision specifies volatile organic compound (VOC) limits for cutback and emulsified asphalts as well as the test methods for determining the VOC content of these products. Michigan also moved the adoption by reference citations from Part 6. Emission Limitations and Prohibitions--Existing Sources of Volatile Organic Emissions to Part 9. Emission Limitations and Prohibitions--Miscellaneous and updated references to federal test methods in several of its Part 6 rules. DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 30, 2018. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05- OAR-2017-0100 or EPA-R05-OAR-2017-0501 at http://www.regulations.gov or via email to Aburano.Douglas@epa.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the For Further Information Contact section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Rosenthal, Environmental Engineer, Attainment Planning and Maintenance Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6052, rosenthal.steven@epa.gov. [[Page 13711]] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,'' ``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information section is arranged as follows: I. What are the State rule revisions? II. Did the State hold public hearings for these submittals? III. What is EPA's analysis of the State's submittals? IV. What action is EPA taking? V. Incorporation by Reference VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. What are the State rule revisions? Michigan revised its rule R 336.1618 ``Use of cutback or emulsified paving asphalt'' along with several other of its VOC rules. Cutback asphalt is asphalt that has been liquefied by blending with an organic solvent. Emulsified asphalt is asphalt that has been liquefied by mixing with water and an emulsifying agent. Both types of asphalt are used to pave or repair road surfaces. The revision to R 336.1618 clarifies VOC limits for cutback and emulsified asphalts and specifies testing requirements for determining the VOC content of these products. Michigan also revised rules R 336.1611 to R 336.1614, R 336.1619, R 336.1622, R 336.1625, R 336.1627 to R 336.1629, R 336.1632, R 336.1651, R 336.1660, and R 336.1661 for the purpose of removing adoptions by reference which have been moved to, and consolidated in, R 336.1902 ``Adoption of standards by reference.'' Revisions to R 336.1622, R 336.1627 to R 336.1629, and R 336.1632 update references to federal test methods. These revisions were submitted on August 1, 2017. Michigan submitted a revised R 336.1902 on February 7, 2017 as part of a separate rulemaking action. Michigan subsequently replaced the February 7, 2017 submittal with a November 8, 2017 supplemental submittal for its Part 9 rules in which it requested that only the following sections of R 336.1902 be included in its SIP. R 336.1902(1)(a), (1)(b)(iii), (iv), (vii) and (viii), (1)(c) to (e), (1)(g), (1)(i) to (n), (1)(s), (2)(b), (2)(e), (2)(g), (4)(a) to (f), (4)(l), (4)(o) and (p), (5), (8) and (9). In a February 6, 2018 memo from Michigan to EPA, it clarified that R 336.1902(4)(p) is the correct version of ASTM Method E169 for inclusion into the SIP; and R 336.1902(1)(b)(i), R 336.1902(3)(a) AND R 336.1902(4)(m) should be included in the Part 9 SIP revisions submitted in February and November 2017. In a February 26, 2018 memo from Michigan to EPA it clarified that R 336.1902(1)(f) should also be included in the SIP. II. Did the State hold public hearings for these submittals? A public hearing on these Part 6 rule revisions was held on November 14, 2016. Only one comment was received and it was not addressed as it was not directed towards the subject rule revisions. A public hearing on the Part 9 (specifically R 336.1902) rule revisions was held on May 2, 2016 and no comments were received. III. What is EPA's analysis of the State's submittals? A. Rule 618--Use of Cutback or Emulsified Paving Asphalt The current SIP-approved version of Rule 618 only applies to cutback asphalts and requires Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) approval for use of cutback asphalts during the ozone season. Michigan revised its rules to clarify the requirements for cutback and emulsified asphalts under Rule 618. The revisions include a VOC content limit that determines whether an asphalt product can be used during the ozone season. In its current SIP-approved rule, cutback asphalts can only be used during the ozone season with MDEQ approval and there is no requirement that the products used during ozone season have a low VOC content. The revised rule specifies a 3 percent VOC content limit to ensure that only low-emitting asphalt products are used during the ozone season. An October 4, 1979 policy memorandum titled ``Clarification for Final SIP Actions on Asphalt Regulations'' states that maximum solvent contents in the range of 5 to 7 percent are acceptable. This VOC content limitation for asphalt usage during the warmer ozone months should result in lower VOC emissions from the use of asphalt products. The revised rule also added definitions for asphalts, emulsified asphalts, as well as cutback asphalts, and specifies the test methods used to determine the VOC content of the asphalts. This rule is therefore approvable because it has an even lower VOC content than what is acceptable as RACT and is more enforceable than the existing SIP approved rule because it contains specific test methods for determining the percent VOC from both emulsified and cutback asphalt and the rule also requires that records be maintained of the manufacture, mixing, storage, use or application of any cutback or emulsified asphalt, including the VOC content of these asphalts. B. Remaining Revisions--Incorporations by Reference Michigan also revised rules R 336.1611 to R 336.1614, R 336.1619, R 336.1622, R 336.1625, R 336.1627 to R 336.1629, R 336.1632, R 336.1651, R 336.1660, and R 336.1661 for the purpose of removing adoptions by reference which have been moved to and consolidated in R 336.1902 ``Adoption of standards by reference.'' The following rules contain the adoption of standards by reference that have been moved from the rules listed above: R 336.1902(1)(a), (1)(b)(i), (iii), (iv), (vii) and (viii), (1)(c) to (g), (1)(i) to (n), (1)(s), (2)(b), (2)(e), (2)(g), (3)(a), (4)(a) to (f), (4)(l), (4)(m), (4)(o) and (p), (5), (8) and (9). These revisions are approvable as they merely move the location of the adoption of standards by reference. IV. What action is EPA taking? EPA is proposing to approve the revisions to Michigan's Part 6 Rules that were submitted on August 1, 2017, as revisions of the Michigan SIP. Specifically, we are approving R 336.1611 to R 336.1614, R 336.1618, R 336.1619, R 336.1622, R 336.1625, R 336.1627 to R 336.1629, R 336.1632, R 336.1651, R 336.1660, and R 336.1661 into the Michigan SIP. We are also proposing to approve revisions to Michigan's Part 9 rules that were submitted on November 8, 2018 and February 6, 2018. Specifically, we are approving R 336.1902(1)(a), (1)(b)(i), (iii), (iv), (vii) and (viii), (1)(c) to (g), (1)(i) to (n), (1)(s), (2)(b), (2)(e), (2)(g), (3)(a), (4)(a) to (f), (4)(l), (4)(m), (4)(o) and (p), (5), (8) and (9). V. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA proposes to incorporate by reference Michigan Administrative Code R 336.1902(1)(a), R 336.1902(1)(b)(iii), (iv), (vii) and (viii), R 336.1902(1)(c) to (g), R 336.1902(1)(i) to (n), R 336.1902(1)(s), R 336.1902(2)(b), R 336.1902(2)(e), R 336.1902(2)(g), R 336.1902(4)(a) to (f), R 336.1902(4)(l), R 336.1902(4)(o) and (p), R 336.1902(5), R 336.1902(8), and R 336.1902(9), effective December 20, 2016, and Michigan Administrative Code R 336.1611, R 336.1612, R 336.1613, R 336.1614, R 336.1618, R 336.1619, R 336.1622, R 336.1625, R 336.1627, R 336.1628, R 336.1629, R 336.1632, R 336.1651, R 336.1660, and R 336.1661, effective March 29, 2017. EPA has [[Page 13712]] made, and will continue to make, these documents generally available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 5 Office (please contact the person identified in the For Further Information Contact section of this preamble for more information). VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under Executive Order 12866; Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Volatile organic compounds, and Ozone. Dated: March 20, 2018. Edward H. Chu, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. [FR Doc. 2018-06543 Filed 3-29-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![13710 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 62 / Friday, March 30, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Regulatory Notices and Analyses within a 3.9-mile radius of the Beaver County ACTION: Proposed rule.
Airport. This Class D airspace area is
The FAA has determined that this effective during the specific dates and times SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
proposed regulation only involves an established in advance by a Notice to Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
established body of technical Airmen. The effective date and time will revised rules submitted by the State of
regulations for which frequent and thereafter be continuously published in the Michigan as State Implementation Plan
routine amendments are necessary to Chart Supplement.
(SIP) revisions. The main revision
keep them operationally current. It, Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace specifies volatile organic compound
therefore: (1) Is not a ‘‘significant Designated as an Extension to Class D or E (VOC) limits for cutback and emulsified
regulatory action’’ under Executive Surface Area. asphalts as well as the test methods for
Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant * * * * * determining the VOC content of these
rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies
AEA PA E4 Beaver Falls, PA [Amended] products. Michigan also moved the
and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February
Beaver County Airport, PA
adoption by reference citations from
26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant
(Lat. 40°46′21″ N, long. 80°23′29″ W) Part 6. Emission Limitations and
preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation
Ellwood City VORTAC Prohibitions—Existing Sources of
as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
(Lat. 40°49′30″ N, long. 80°12′41″ W) Volatile Organic Emissions to Part 9.
Since this is a routine matter that will
That airspace extending upward from the Emission Limitations and
only affect air traffic procedures and air
surface within 1.3 miles each side of the Prohibitions—Miscellaneous and
navigation, it is certified that this Ellwood City VORTAC 248° radial extending updated references to federal test
proposed rule, when promulgated, will from the 3.9-mile radius of Beaver County methods in several of its Part 6 rules.
not have a significant economic impact Airport to 1.3 miles west of the VORTAC.
on a substantial number of small entities This Class E airspace area is effective during DATES: Comments must be received on
under the criteria of the Regulatory the specific dates and times established in or before April 30, 2018.
Flexibility Act. advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
date and time will thereafter be continuously identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
Environmental Review published in the Chart Supplement. OAR–2017–0100 or EPA–R05–OAR–
This proposal will be subject to an Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas 2017–0501 at http://
environmental analysis in accordance Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More www.regulations.gov or via email to
with FAA Order 1050.1F, Above the Surface of the Earth. Aburano.Douglas@epa.gov. For
‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and * * * * * comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final follow the online instructions for
AEA PA E5 Beaver Falls, PA [Amended]
regulatory action. submitting comments. Once submitted,
Beaver County Airport, PA comments cannot be edited or removed
Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 (Lat. 40°46′21″ N, long. 80°23′29″ W)
Ellwood City VORTAC from Regulations.gov. For either manner
Airspace, Incorporation by reference, of submission, EPA may publish any
(Lat. 40°49′30″ N, long. 80°12′42″ W)
Navigation (air). comment received to its public docket.
That airspace extending upward from 700
The Proposed Amendment feet above the surface within a 6.4-mile Do not submit electronically any
radius of Beaver County Airport, and within information you consider to be
In consideration of the foregoing, the 1.8-miles each side of Ellwood City VORTAC Confidential Business Information (CBI)
Federal Aviation Administration 248° radial extending from the 6.4-mile or other information whose disclosure is
proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as radius to the VORTAC. restricted by statute. Multimedia
follows: * * * * * submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, AEA PA E5 Zelienople, PA [Amended] accompanied by a written comment.
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR The written comment is considered the
Zelienople Municipal Airport, PA
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND (Lat. 40°48′07″ N, long. 80°09′39″ W) official comment and should include
REPORTING POINTS discussion of all points you wish to
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 6-mile radius make. EPA will generally not consider
■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 of Zelienople Municipal Airport. comments or comment contents located
continues to read as follows: outside of the primary submission (i.e.
Issued in College Park, Georgia, on March
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 14, 2018. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, system). For additional submission
Ryan W. Almasy,
1959–1963 Comp., p. 389. methods, please contact the person
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern
identified in the FOR FURTHER
§ 71.1 [Amended] Service Center, Air Traffic Organization.
INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the
■ 2. The incorporation by reference in [FR Doc. 2018–06389 Filed 3–29–18; 8:45 am]
full EPA public comment policy,
14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
information about CBI or multimedia
Administration Order 7400.11B, submissions, and general guidance on
Airspace Designations and Reporting making effective comments, please visit
Points, dated August 3, 2017, and ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
effective September 15, 2017, is AGENCY commenting-epa-dockets.
amended as follows: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
40 CFR Part 52
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS
Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace.
Steven Rosenthal, Environmental
[EPA–R05–OAR–2017–0100; EPA–R05– Engineer, Attainment Planning and
* * * * * OAR–2017–0501; FRL–9976–10—Region 5] Maintenance Section, Air Programs
AEA PA D Beaver Falls, PA [Amended] Branch (AR–18J), Environmental
Air Plan Approval; Michigan; Revisions
Beaver County Airport, PA Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West
to Volatile Organic Compound Rules
(Lat. 40°46′21″ N, long. 80°23′29″ W) Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois
That airspace extending upward from the AGENCY: Environmental Protection 60604, (312) 886–6052,
surface to and including 3,800 feet MSL Agency (EPA). rosenthal.steven@epa.gov.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:11 Mar 29, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30MRP1.SGM 30MRP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_13772/page/1.svg)
![13712 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 62 / Friday, March 30, 2018 / Proposed Rules
made, and will continue to make, these practicable and legally permissible the CAA requires the state to make a
documents generally available through methods, under Executive Order 12898 new SIP submission establishing that
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). the existing SIP meets the various
Region 5 Office (please contact the In addition, the SIP is not approved applicable requirements, or revising the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER to apply on any Indian reservation land SIP to meet those requirements. This
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this or in any other area where EPA or an type of SIP submission is commonly
preamble for more information). Indian tribe has demonstrated that a referred to as an ‘‘infrastructure’’ SIP. In
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of this proposed action, EPA is proposing
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Indian country, the rule does not have to approve the June 23, 2017, and
Reviews tribal implications and will not impose February 2, 2018 submissions with
Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the substantial direct costs on tribal respect to the CAA requirements
Administrator is required to approve a governments or preempt tribal law as applicable to state boards; and the
SIP submission that complies with the specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 related state board infrastructure SIP
provisions of the CAA and applicable FR 67249, November 9, 2000). requirements for the 2008 8-hour Ozone,
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 2008 Lead, 2010 NO2, 2010 SO2 and
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP 1997, 2006 and 2012 PM2.5, NAAQS. If
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve Environmental protection, Air this proposed approval action is
state choices, provided that they meet pollution control, Incorporation by finalized, EPA will no longer be
the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, reference, Intergovernmental relations, required to promulgate a Federal
this action merely approves state law as Volatile organic compounds, and Implementation Plan (FIP) to address
meeting Federal requirements and does Ozone. the CAA state board requirements for
not impose additional requirements Dated: March 20, 2018. Mississippi, as described in more detail
beyond those imposed by state law. For Edward H. Chu, below.
that reason, this action: Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. DATES: Written comments must be
• Is not a significant regulatory action [FR Doc. 2018–06543 Filed 3–29–18; 8:45 am] received on or before April 30, 2018.
subject to review by the Office of
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Management and Budget under ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, OAR–2017–0546 at http://
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
January 21, 2011); www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
AGENCY
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 instructions for submitting comments.
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory 40 CFR Part 52 Once submitted, comments cannot be
action because SIP approvals are edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
[EPA–R04–OAR–2017–0546; FRL–9976– EPA may publish any comment received
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
16—Region 4]
• Does not impose an information to its public docket. Do not submit
collection burden under the provisions Air Plan Approval; MS; Section 128 electronically any information you
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 Board Requirements for Infrastructure consider to be Confidential Business
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); SIPs Information (CBI) or other information
• Is certified as not having a whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
significant economic impact on a AGENCY: Environmental Protection Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
substantial number of small entities Agency. etc.) must be accompanied by a written
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 ACTION: Proposed rule. comment. The written comment is
U.S.C. 601 et seq.); considered the official comment and
• Does not contain any unfunded SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection should include discussion of all points
mandate or significantly or uniquely Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve you wish to make. EPA will generally
affect small governments, as described the draft State Implementation Plan not consider comments or comment
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (SIP) submissions, submitted by the contents located outside of the primary
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); State of Mississippi, through the submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
• Does not have Federalism Mississippi Department of other file sharing system). For
implications as specified in Executive Environmental Quality (MDEQ) for additional submission methods, the full
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, parallel processing, on June 23, 2017, EPA public comment policy,
1999); and February 2, 2018. Together these information about CBI or multimedia
• Is not an economically significant draft submittals address specific Clean submissions, and general guidance on
regulatory action based on health or Air Act (CAA or Act) requirements making effective comments, please visit
safety risks subject to Executive Order applicable to Mississippi state boards or http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); bodies that approve CAA permits and commenting-epa-dockets.
• Is not a significant regulatory action enforcement orders. These submissions
also request that EPA convert the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001); previous partial disapproval of Nacosta C. Ward, Air Regulatory
• Is not subject to requirements of Mississippi’s infrastructure SIPs related Management Section, Air Planning and
section 12(d) of the National to the CAA state board significant Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides
and Toxics Management Division, U.S.
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS
Technology Transfer and Advancement portion of income requirements for the
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 2008 8-hour Ozone, 2008 Lead, 2010 Environmental Protection Agency,
application of those requirements would Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), 2010 Sulfur Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta,
be inconsistent with the CAA; and Dioxide (SO2), and 1997, 2006 and 2012 Georgia 30303–8960. The telephone
• Does not provide EPA with the fine particulate matter (PM2.5) national number is (404) 562–9140. Ms. Ward
discretionary authority to address, as ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) can be reached via electronic mail at
appropriate, disproportionate human to full approvals. Whenever EPA ward.nacosta@epa.gov.
health or environmental effects, using promulgates a new or revised NAAQS, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:11 Mar 29, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30MRP1.SGM 30MRP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_13772/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-11-01 08:58:29
Document Modified: 2018-11-01 08:58:29
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Comments must be received on or before April 30, 2018. | |
| Contact | Steven Rosenthal, Environmental Engineer, Attainment Planning and Maintenance Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6052, [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 13710 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Volatile Organic Compounds and Ozone |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR