83_FR_13842 83 FR 13780 - Certain Magnetic Tape Cartridges and Components Thereof: Commission Determination To Review in Part the Final Initial Determination; and, on Review, To Find No Violation of Section 337; Termination of the Investigation

83 FR 13780 - Certain Magnetic Tape Cartridges and Components Thereof: Commission Determination To Review in Part the Final Initial Determination; and, on Review, To Find No Violation of Section 337; Termination of the Investigation

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 62 (March 30, 2018)

Page Range13780-13781
FR Document2018-06416

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to review in part the Chief Administrative Law Judge's (``ALJ'') final initial determination (``ID''), issued on January 25, 2018, finding no violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337) (``section 337''), in the above- captioned investigation. On review, the Commission has determined to find no violation of section 337. The investigation is terminated in its entirety.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 62 (Friday, March 30, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 62 (Friday, March 30, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13780-13781]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-06416]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1036]


Certain Magnetic Tape Cartridges and Components Thereof: 
Commission Determination To Review in Part the Final Initial 
Determination; and, on Review, To Find No Violation of Section 337; 
Termination of the Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined to review in part the Chief Administrative 
Law Judge's (``ALJ'') final initial determination (``ID''), issued on 
January 25, 2018, finding no violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act 
of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337) (``section 337''), in the above-
captioned investigation. On review, the Commission has determined to 
find no violation of section 337. The investigation is terminated in 
its entirety.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathy Chen, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2392. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted the above-
captioned investigation on January 24, 2017, based on a complaint filed 
by Sony Corporation of Tokyo, Japan; Sony Storage Media and Devices 
Corporation of Miyagi, Japan; Sony DADC US Inc. of Terre Haute, 
Indiana; and Sony Latin America Inc. of Miami, Florida (collectively, 
``Sony''). See 82 FR 8209-10 (Jan. 24, 2017). The complaint, as

[[Page 13781]]

supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 based upon the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain magnetic 
tape cartridges and components thereof by reason of infringement of 
certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,345,779 (``the '779 patent''); U.S. 
Patent No. 7,115,331 (``the '331 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,896,959 
(``the '959 patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 7,016,137 (``the '137 
patent''). Id. The notice of investigation named Fujifilm Holdings 
Corporation of Tokyo, Japan; Fujifilm Corporation of Tokyo, Japan; 
Fujifilm Holdings America Corporation of Valhalla, New York; and 
Fujifilm Recording Media U.S.A., Inc. of Bedford, Massachusetts 
(collectively, ``Fujifilm'') as respondents in this investigation. Id. 
The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is also a party to this 
investigation. Id.
    All asserted claims of the '959 patent and the '137 patent and one 
asserted claim of the '331 patent have been terminated from the 
investigation. See Order Nos. 20 and 21; Comm'n Notices (Sep. 25, 
2017). The evidentiary hearing was held on September 25-28, 2017.
    On January 25, 2018, the Chief ALJ issued his final ID and his 
recommended determination (``RD'') on remedy and bonding in this 
investigation. The ID finds no violation of section 337 by Fujifilm in 
connection with claims 1-6 of the '779 patent and claims 1-3, 9-11, 13-
14, and 16-17 of the '331 patent (collectively, ``the Asserted 
Patents''). Specifically, the ID finds that Fujifilm does not infringe 
the asserted claims of the Asserted Patents. The ID also finds that the 
asserted claims of the '331 patent have not been proven invalid but 
that the asserted claims of the '779 patent are anticipated and/or 
obvious. The ID further finds that the technical prong of the domestic 
industry requirement has not been satisfied for the '779 patent but has 
been satisfied for the '331 patent. And, finally, the ID finds the 
economic prong of the domestic industry requirement has not been 
satisfied for the Asserted Patents.
    On February 7, 2018, Sony and the Commission's Investigative 
Attorney each filed a timely petition for review of the ID and Fujifilm 
filed a contingent petition for review of the ID. On February 15, 2018, 
the parties filed timely responses to the petitions for review. No 
public interest comments were filed by the public in this 
investigation.
    Having examined the record of this investigation, including the ID, 
the petitions for review, and the responses thereto, the Commission has 
determined to review the ID in part. First, the Commission has 
determined to correct three typographical errors on page 51 of the ID. 
In line 16 of the ID, ``securing the leader pin spring in the tape 
cartridge'' is replaced with ``securing the leader pin in the tape 
cartridge.'' In line 18 of the ID, ``claim'' is replaced with ``claim 
1'' and ``leader pin sits loosely'' is replaced with ``leader pin 
spring sits loosely.''
    Second, with respect to the '779 patent, the Commission has 
determined to review the ID's finding that the 15th embodiment in U.S. 
Patent No. 6,236,539 (``Morita'') does not anticipate the asserted 
claims, and the ID's finding that claims 5 and 6 are rendered obvious 
by a combination of Morita's 6th and 15th embodiments.
    Third, with respect to the '331 patent, the Commission has 
determined to review the ID's finding that the Fujifilm's accused 
products do not infringe and that IBM's domestic industry products do 
not practice the asserted claims of the '331 patent; the ID's 
construction of the claim term ``metallic magnetic particulate 
pigment;'' the ID's finding that JP 2002-074641 (``Mori'') does not 
anticipate the asserted claims; and the ID's finding that JP 2003-
123226 (``Naoe'') does not anticipate the asserted claims.
    Finally, the Commission has determined to review the ID's finding 
that the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement has not 
been satisfied for the Asserted Patents.
    On review, the Commission has determined to construe the ``magnetic 
metallic particulate pigment'' limitation in claims 1 and 16 of the 
'331 patent to mean the ``magnetic metal particle pigments have a 
composition including, but not limited to, metallic iron and/or alloys 
of iron with cobalt and/or nickel, and magnetic or non-magnetic oxides 
of iron, other elements, or mixtures thereof.'' JX-0004 at 4:36-39.
    The Commission has also determined to affirm the ID's finding that 
Fujifilm's accused products do not infringe and that IBM's domestic 
industry products do not practice the asserted claims of the '331 
patent. The Commission adopts the ID's analysis on pages 99-120 and 
125-128, and further relies on Dr. Wang's coercivity measurements for 
Fujifilm's accused products and IBM's domestic industry products as a 
basis for finding Sony's expert's conclusions unreliable. See RX-0010C 
(Wang RWS) Q/A 282, 296, 303. Dr. Wang's coercivity measurements 
demonstrate that these products do not meet the ``coercivity of at 
least about [2300/2500] Oe'' limitation as required by claims 1 and 16 
of the '331 patent.
    The Commission has determined to take no position on the other 
issues under review.
    The Commission has further determined not to review the remainder 
of the ID, including the ID's findings that Fujifilm does not infringe 
the asserted claims of the '779 patent; that claims 1-4 of the '779 
patent are anticipated by Morita's 6th embodiment; and that the 
technical prong of the domestic industry requirement has not been 
satisfied for the '779 patent. Accordingly, the Commission has 
determined to affirm with modifications the ID's finding of no 
violation of section 337. The investigation is terminated in its 
entirety.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: March 26, 2018.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018-06416 Filed 3-29-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P



                                             13780                           Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 62 / Friday, March 30, 2018 / Notices

                                             extends from longitude 156° W (roughly                  a document contains a mix of                          INTERNATIONAL TRADE
                                             north of the village of Utqiaġvik,                     proprietary and nonproprietary                        COMMISSION
                                             formerly known as Barrow) on the west                   information, the document should be
                                                                                                                                                           [Investigation No. 337–TA–1036]
                                             to the Canadian maritime boundary.                      clearly marked to indicate which
                                             This area consists of 11,876 whole and                  portion of the document is proprietary                Certain Magnetic Tape Cartridges and
                                             partial blocks (about 65 million acres, or              and which is not. Exemption 4 of FOIA                 Components Thereof: Commission
                                             26.2 million hectares).                                 applies to trade secrets and commercial               Determination To Review in Part the
                                               A map depicting the Call Area is                      or financial information that you submit              Final Initial Determination; and, on
                                             available for download on the BOEM
                                                                                                     that is privileged or confidential. The               Review, To Find No Violation of
                                             website at: http://www.boem.gov/
                                                                                                     OCSLA states that the ‘‘Secretary shall               Section 337; Termination of the
                                             Beaufort2019. Copies of Official
                                                                                                     maintain the confidentiality of all                   Investigation
                                             Protraction Diagrams (OPDs) also are
                                             available for download on the BOEM                      privileged or proprietary data or                     AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
                                             website at: https://www.boem.gov/                       information for such period of time as                Commission.
                                             Maps-and-GIS-Data/.                                     is provided for in this subchapter,
                                                                                                                                                           ACTION: Notice.
                                                                                                     established by regulation, or agreed to
                                             4. Instructions on the Call                             by the parties’’ (43 U.S.C. 1344(g)).                 SUMMARY:    Notice is hereby given that
                                                Parties interested in leasing are                    BOEM considers nominations of                         the U.S. International Trade
                                             requested to indicate their interest in,                specific blocks to be proprietary, and                Commission has determined to review
                                             and comment on, the Federal acreage                     therefore BOEM will not release                       in part the Chief Administrative Law
                                             within the boundaries of the Call Area                  information that identifies any                       Judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) final initial
                                             that they wish to have included in the                  particular nomination with any                        determination (‘‘ID’’), issued on January
                                             proposed lease sale. Respondents                        particular party, so as not to                        25, 2018, finding no violation of section
                                             should explicitly outline the areas of                  compromise the competitive position of                337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
                                             interest along block lines and rank the                 any participants in the process of                    amended (19 U.S.C. 1337) (‘‘section
                                             areas or specific blocks in which they                                                                        337’’), in the above-captioned
                                                                                                     indicating interest.
                                             are interested, according to their                                                                            investigation. On review, the
                                             priority, using the following indicators:                  However, please be aware that                      Commission has determined to find no
                                             1 [high], 2 [medium], or 3 [low].                       BOEM’s practice is to make all                        violation of section 337. The
                                             Respondents are encouraged to be as                     comments, including the names and                     investigation is terminated in its
                                             specific as possible in prioritizing                    addresses of individuals, available for               entirety.
                                             blocks and supporting nominations of                    public inspection. Before including your
                                                                                                                                                           FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                             specific blocks with detailed                           address, phone number, email address,
                                             information, such as relevant geologic,                                                                       Cathy Chen, Esq., Office of the General
                                                                                                     or other personal identifying
                                             geophysical, and economic data. Areas                                                                         Counsel, U.S. International Trade
                                                                                                     information in your comment, please be
                                             where interest has been indicated, but                                                                        Commission, 500 E Street SW,
                                                                                                     advised that your entire comment,                     Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
                                             on which respondents have not                           including your personal identifying
                                             indicated priorities, will be considered                                                                      205–2392. Copies of non-confidential
                                                                                                     information, may be made publicly                     documents filed in connection with this
                                             low priority. Respondents may also                      available at any time. In order for BOEM
                                             submit a list of blocks nominated by                                                                          investigation are or will be available for
                                                                                                     to withhold from disclosure your                      inspection during official business
                                             OPD and Leasing Map designations to                     personal identifying information, you
                                             ensure correct interpretation of their                                                                        hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
                                                                                                     must identify any information contained               Office of the Secretary, U.S.
                                             nominations. OPDs and Leasing Maps                      in the submission of your comments
                                             are available on BOEM’s website at                                                                            International Trade Commission,
                                                                                                     that, if released, would constitute a                 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC
                                             https://www.boem.gov/Maps-and-GIS-
                                                                                                     clearly unwarranted invasion of your                  20436, telephone (202) 205–2000.
                                             Data/.
                                                BOEM also seeks comments from all                    personal privacy. You must also briefly               General information concerning the
                                             interested parties about particular                     describe any possible harmful                         Commission may also be obtained by
                                             geological, environmental, biological,                  consequence(s) of the disclosure of                   accessing its internet server at https://
                                             archaeological and socioeconomic                        information, such as embarrassment,                   www.usitc.gov. The public record for
                                             conditions, multi-use conflicts, or other               injury or other harm. While you can ask               this investigation may be viewed on the
                                             information about conditions that could                 us in your comment to withhold from                   Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
                                             affect the potential leasing and                        public review your personal identifying               at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-
                                             development of particular areas.                        information, we cannot guarantee that                 impaired persons are advised that
                                             Comments may refer to broad areas or                    we will be able to do so. BOEM will                   information on this matter can be
                                             may refer to particular OCS blocks.                     make available for public inspection, in              obtained by contacting the
                                                                                                     their entirety, all comments submitted                Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
                                             5. Protection of Privileged or Proprietary                                                                    205–1810.
                                             Information                                             by organizations and businesses, or by
                                                                                                     individuals identifying themselves as                 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
                                                BOEM will protect privileged or                      representatives of organizations or                   Commission instituted the above-
                                             proprietary information that industry                   businesses.                                           captioned investigation on January 24,
                                             submits in accordance with the                                                                                2017, based on a complaint filed by
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES




                                             Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and                    Dated: March 5, 2018.                                Sony Corporation of Tokyo, Japan; Sony
                                             OCSLA requirements. To avoid                            Walter D. Cruickshank,                                Storage Media and Devices Corporation
                                             inadvertent release of such information,                Acting Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy               of Miyagi, Japan; Sony DADC US Inc. of
                                             all documents and every page                            Management.                                           Terre Haute, Indiana; and Sony Latin
                                             containing such information should be                   [FR Doc. 2018–06533 Filed 3–29–18; 8:45 am]           America Inc. of Miami, Florida
                                             marked with ‘‘Confidential—Contains                     BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P
                                                                                                                                                           (collectively, ‘‘Sony’’). See 82 FR 8209–
                                             Proprietary Information.’’ To the extent                                                                      10 (Jan. 24, 2017). The complaint, as


                                        VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:57 Mar 29, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00060   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM   30MRN1


                                                                             Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 62 / Friday, March 30, 2018 / Notices                                                 13781

                                             supplemented, alleges violations of                     thereto, the Commission has determined                Oe’’ limitation as required by claims 1
                                             section 337 based upon the importation                  to review the ID in part. First, the                  and 16 of the ’331 patent.
                                             into the United States, the sale for                    Commission has determined to correct                    The Commission has determined to
                                             importation, and the sale within the                    three typographical errors on page 51 of              take no position on the other issues
                                             United States after importation of                      the ID. In line 16 of the ID, ‘‘securing the          under review.
                                             certain magnetic tape cartridges and                    leader pin spring in the tape cartridge’’               The Commission has further
                                             components thereof by reason of                         is replaced with ‘‘securing the leader                determined not to review the remainder
                                             infringement of certain claims of U.S.                  pin in the tape cartridge.’’ In line 18 of            of the ID, including the ID’s findings
                                             Patent No. 6,345,779 (‘‘the ’779 patent’’);             the ID, ‘‘claim’’ is replaced with ‘‘claim            that Fujifilm does not infringe the
                                             U.S. Patent No. 7,115,331 (‘‘the ’331                   1’’ and ‘‘leader pin sits loosely’’ is                asserted claims of the ’779 patent; that
                                             patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,896,959 (‘‘the             replaced with ‘‘leader pin spring sits                claims 1–4 of the ’779 patent are
                                             ’959 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No.                     loosely.’’                                            anticipated by Morita’s 6th
                                             7,016,137 (‘‘the ’137 patent’’). Id. The                   Second, with respect to the ’779                   embodiment; and that the technical
                                             notice of investigation named Fujifilm                  patent, the Commission has determined                 prong of the domestic industry
                                             Holdings Corporation of Tokyo, Japan;                   to review the ID’s finding that the 15th              requirement has not been satisfied for
                                             Fujifilm Corporation of Tokyo, Japan;                   embodiment in U.S. Patent No.                         the ’779 patent. Accordingly, the
                                             Fujifilm Holdings America Corporation                   6,236,539 (‘‘Morita’’) does not anticipate            Commission has determined to affirm
                                             of Valhalla, New York; and Fujifilm                     the asserted claims, and the ID’s finding             with modifications the ID’s finding of
                                             Recording Media U.S.A., Inc. of                         that claims 5 and 6 are rendered obvious              no violation of section 337. The
                                             Bedford, Massachusetts (collectively,                   by a combination of Morita’s 6th and                  investigation is terminated in its
                                             ‘‘Fujifilm’’) as respondents in this                    15th embodiments.                                     entirety.
                                             investigation. Id. The Office of Unfair                    Third, with respect to the ’331 patent,              The authority for the Commission’s
                                             Import Investigations is also a party to                the Commission has determined to                      determination is contained in section
                                             this investigation. Id.                                 review the ID’s finding that the                      337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
                                                All asserted claims of the ’959 patent               Fujifilm’s accused products do not                    amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
                                             and the ’137 patent and one asserted                    infringe and that IBM’s domestic                      210 of the Commission’s Rules of
                                             claim of the ’331 patent have been                      industry products do not practice the                 Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
                                             terminated from the investigation. See                  asserted claims of the ’331 patent; the               210).
                                             Order Nos. 20 and 21; Comm’n Notices                    ID’s construction of the claim term                     By order of the Commission.
                                             (Sep. 25, 2017). The evidentiary hearing                ‘‘metallic magnetic particulate                         Issued: March 26, 2018.
                                             was held on September 25–28, 2017.                      pigment;’’ the ID’s finding that JP 2002–
                                                On January 25, 2018, the Chief ALJ                                                                         Lisa Barton,
                                                                                                     074641 (‘‘Mori’’) does not anticipate the             Secretary to the Commission.
                                             issued his final ID and his
                                                                                                     asserted claims; and the ID’s finding
                                             recommended determination (‘‘RD’’) on                                                                         [FR Doc. 2018–06416 Filed 3–29–18; 8:45 am]
                                             remedy and bonding in this                              that JP 2003–123226 (‘‘Naoe’’) does not
                                                                                                                                                           BILLING CODE P
                                             investigation. The ID finds no violation                anticipate the asserted claims.
                                             of section 337 by Fujifilm in connection                   Finally, the Commission has
                                             with claims 1–6 of the ’779 patent and                  determined to review the ID’s finding                 INTERNATIONAL TRADE
                                             claims 1–3, 9–11, 13–14, and 16–17 of                   that the economic prong of the domestic               COMMISSION
                                             the ’331 patent (collectively, ‘‘the                    industry requirement has not been
                                                                                                     satisfied for the Asserted Patents.                   [Investigation No. 337–TA–1091]
                                             Asserted Patents’’). Specifically, the ID
                                             finds that Fujifilm does not infringe the                  On review, the Commission has
                                                                                                                                                           Certain Intraoral Scanners and Related
                                             asserted claims of the Asserted Patents.                determined to construe the ‘‘magnetic
                                                                                                                                                           Hardware and Software Commission
                                             The ID also finds that the asserted                     metallic particulate pigment’’ limitation
                                                                                                                                                           Determination Not To Review an Initial
                                             claims of the ’331 patent have not been                 in claims 1 and 16 of the ’331 patent to
                                                                                                                                                           Determination Granting a Motion for
                                             proven invalid but that the asserted                    mean the ‘‘magnetic metal particle
                                                                                                                                                           Leave To Amend the Complaint and
                                             claims of the ’779 patent are anticipated               pigments have a composition including,
                                                                                                                                                           Notice of Investigation To Add
                                             and/or obvious. The ID further finds                    but not limited to, metallic iron and/or
                                                                                                                                                           Respondent
                                             that the technical prong of the domestic                alloys of iron with cobalt and/or nickel,
                                             industry requirement has not been                       and magnetic or non-magnetic oxides of                AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
                                             satisfied for the ’779 patent but has been              iron, other elements, or mixtures                     Commission.
                                             satisfied for the ’331 patent. And,                     thereof.’’ JX–0004 at 4:36–39.                        ACTION: Notice.
                                             finally, the ID finds the economic prong                   The Commission has also determined
                                             of the domestic industry requirement                    to affirm the ID’s finding that Fujifilm’s            SUMMARY:   Notice is hereby given that
                                             has not been satisfied for the Asserted                 accused products do not infringe and                  the U.S. International Trade
                                             Patents.                                                that IBM’s domestic industry products                 Commission has determined not to
                                                On February 7, 2018, Sony and the                    do not practice the asserted claims of                review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
                                             Commission’s Investigative Attorney                     the ’331 patent. The Commission adopts                (Order No.11) of the presiding
                                             each filed a timely petition for review of              the ID’s analysis on pages 99–120 and                 administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’),
                                             the ID and Fujifilm filed a contingent                  125–128, and further relies on Dr.                    granting complainant’s unopposed
                                             petition for review of the ID. On                       Wang’s coercivity measurements for                    motion for leave to amend the
                                             February 15, 2018, the parties filed                    Fujifilm’s accused products and IBM’s                 complaint and notice of investigation to
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with NOTICES




                                             timely responses to the petitions for                   domestic industry products as a basis                 add 3Shape Trios A/S of Copenhagen,
                                             review. No public interest comments                     for finding Sony’s expert’s conclusions               Denmark, as a respondent.
                                             were filed by the public in this                        unreliable. See RX–0010C (Wang RWS)                   FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                             investigation.                                          Q/A 282, 296, 303. Dr. Wang’s                         Amanda Fisherow, Esq., Office of the
                                                Having examined the record of this                   coercivity measurements demonstrate                   General Counsel, U.S. International
                                             investigation, including the ID, the                    that these products do not meet the                   Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
                                             petitions for review, and the responses                 ‘‘coercivity of at least about [2300/2500]            Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)


                                        VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:57 Mar 29, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00061   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM   30MRN1



Document Created: 2018-11-01 08:58:06
Document Modified: 2018-11-01 08:58:06
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice.
ContactCathy Chen, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2392. Copies of non- confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https:// www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810.
FR Citation83 FR 13780 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR