83 FR 14074 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; Investors Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Establish a New Optional Listing Category on the Exchange, “LTSE Listings on IEX”
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 63 (April 2, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 63 (April 2, 2018)
| Page Range | 14074-14096 | |
| FR Document | 2018-06568 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 63 (Monday, April 2, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 14074-14096] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-06568] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-82948; File No. SR-IEX-2018-06] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Investors Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Establish a New Optional Listing Category on the Exchange, ``LTSE Listings on IEX'' March 27, 2018. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''),\2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given that, on March 15, 2018, the Investors Exchange LLC (``IEX'' or the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the self- regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a. \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change Pursuant to the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) under the Act of 1934,\4\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\5\ IEX is filing with the Commission a proposed rule change to establish a new optional listing category on the Exchange, which provides a differentiated choice for issuers and investors that prefer listing standards explicitly designed to promote long-term value creation. The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's website at www.iextrading.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \5\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose (1) Overview On June 17, 2016, the Commission granted the Exchange's application for registration as a national securities exchange under Section 6 of the Act,\6\ including approval of rules applicable to the qualification, listing and delisting of companies on the Exchange. The Exchange has since adopted additional rules to create a listing venue to provide a new alternative for companies seeking to list their securities for trading on a registered national securities exchange.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f. \7\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80453 (April 13, 2017), 82 FR 18507 (April 19, 2017); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81316 (August 4, 2017), 82 FR 37474 (August 10, 2017); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80905 (June 12, 2017), 82 FR 27748 (June 16, 2017). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange is proposing to adopt rules to facilitate the creation of a new optional listing category on the Exchange for common equity securities, referred to as the ``LTSE Listings on IEX'' or ``LTSE Listings.'' The proposed rules for LTSE Listings, to be contained in new Chapter 14A of the Exchange's rules (the ``LTSE Listings Rules''), were initially developed by LTSE Holdings, Inc. (together with its affiliates, ``LTSE''), and provide a differentiated choice for issuers and investors that prefer listing standards explicitly designed to promote long-term value creation. The Exchange understands that LTSE anticipates separately registering a subsidiary as a national securities exchange in the future, but has entered into an arrangement with the Exchange in order to make the LTSE Listings Rules available to potential interested companies in advance of its own subsidiary's registration as a national securities exchange. Becoming subject to the LTSE Listings Rules would be an optional election. Companies listed on the Exchange that do not elect to be subject to the LTSE Listings Rules would not be required to comply with Chapter 14A. However, companies that list on LTSE Listings (``LTSE Listings Issuers'') would be subject to the LTSE Listings Rules, as well as the quantitative listing requirements set forth in IEX Rule Series 14.300, and all other applicable listing rules of the Exchange set forth in Chapter 14 of the IEX Rulebook, except [[Page 14075]] as they may be specifically modified for LTSE Listings Issuers. At this time, the Exchange is limiting the availability of LTSE Listings to companies seeking to list on LTSE Listings concurrently with their initial public offering (whether listing on LTSE Listings only or dually listing on LTSE Listings and another national securities exchange). The Exchange would not permit issuers already listed on another national securities exchange to transfer to LTSE Listings. The Exchange believes that the new LTSE Listings category will introduce a differentiated choice for issuers and investors that prefer listing standards explicitly designed to promote long-term value creation, potentially enhancing opportunities for capital formation, as well as contributing to greater competition for listings among national securities exchanges. At the same time, as LTSE Listings will be an entirely optional listing category, the introduction of LTSE Listings will not impact companies that elect to list on the Exchange under its existing listing rules. (2) Background (A) Concerns about Short-Termism in the Markets Many academics, commentators, market participants,\8\ as well as certain current and former members of the Commission \9\ have voiced concerns regarding so-called ``short-termism'' and the risk that some investors' focus on short-term results could put pressure on companies to sacrifice long-term value creation in order to reach quarterly or other short-term expectations. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See, e.g., McKinsey & Company, McKinsey Global Institute, Measuring the Economic Impact of Short-Termism (February 2017), available at http://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/ global%20themes/long%20term%20capitalism/ where%20companies%20with%20a%20long%20term%20view%20outperform%20thei r%20peers/measuring-the-economic-impact-of-short-termism.ashx (``Our findings show that companies we classify as `long term' outperform their shorter-term peers on a range of key economic and financial metrics.''); Aspen Institute, American Prosperity Project (December 2016), available at https://assets.aspeninstitute.org/content/uploads/2017/01/American-Prosperity-Project_Policy-Framework_FINAL-1.3.17.pdf (``Perverse incentives in our corporate governance system undermine the health of capitalism itself. Short-termism is baked into our tax system and is evident in the decisions, regulations and rules that govern corporations and capital markets. Changes to the rules of the game are a necessary step to rebuild the public's trust in our economic system.''); Martin Lipton, The New Paradigm (January 11, 2017), available at http://www.wlrk.com/docs/thenewparadigm.pdf (``The economic impact of a short-term myopic approach to managing and investing in businesses has become abundantly clear and has been generating rising levels of concern across a broad spectrum of stakeholders, including corporations, investors, policymakers and academics. The proposition that short-term financial activists and reactive corporate behavior spur sustainable improvements in corporate performance, and thereby systemically increase rather than undermine long-term economic prosperity and social welfare, has been overwhelmingly disproved by the real world experience of corporate decision-makers as well as a growing body of academic research.''); Chief Justice Leo Strine, Who Bleeds When the Wolves Bite? A Flesh- and-Blood Perspective on Hedge Fund Activism and Our Strange Corporate Governance System (April 2017), available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2921901 (``Rather, human investors would see great benefit from reforms encouraging the agents responsible for their money to adopt the long-term horizon held by their principals, i.e., human investors.''); Travis Baratko, A Times-Mirror Conversation With Sen. Mark Warner, The Loudoun Times-Mirror (July 27, 2015), available at http://www.loudountimes.com/news/article/a_loudoun_times_mirror_conversation_with_sen._mark_warner432 (quoting Senator Mark Warner as noting that ``[P]eople being investors who are only focused on short-termism, too often you can squeeze a quarterly profit out at the expense of a long-term value proposition.''). \9\ See, e.g., Jay Clayton, Hearing before the Senate Banking Committee on the Nomination of Jay Clayton, of New York, to be a Member of the Securities and Exchange Commission (March 23, 2017), available at https://www.thefederalregister.org/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-115shrg24998/html/CHRG-115shrg24998.htm (``In my experience, certain companies view the operational and other pressures inherent in quarterly earnings as costly, including because they detract from long-term planning and strategic initiatives''); Commissioner Daniel M. Gallagher, Activism, Short-Termism, and the SEC: Remarks at the 21st Annual Stanford Directors' College (June 23, 2015), available at https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/activism-short-termism-and-the-sec.html (``[T]here seems to be a predominance of short-term thinking at the expense of long-term investing. Some activists are swooping in, making a lot of noise, and demanding one of a number of ways to drive a short-term pop in value: spinning off a profitable division, beginning a share buy-back program, or slashing capital expenditures or research and development expenses.''); Commissioner Kara M. Stein, Toward Healthy Companies and a Stronger Economy: Remarks to the U.S. Treasury Department's Corporate Women in Finance Symposium (April 30, 2015), available at https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/stein-toward-healthy-companies.html (``The heart of the argument is that short-term pressures from certain investors, and markets in general, compel companies to look narrowly at the short-term. As a result, companies become overly focused on meeting quarterly earnings targets. . .To meet these demands, companies have to cut back on capital expenditures, research and development, workforce training, and other investments that lead to new innovation, higher productivity, and future growth.''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Commenters have pointed to the dramatically declining average amount of time that an investor holds a stock as evidence of a greater short-term focus.\10\ Share turnover data suggests that investors held stocks for an average of about eight years in 1960, compared with about eight months in 2015.\11\ While a great deal of this turnover may be attributable to the growth of high-frequency trading strategies (which accounted for about 50% of all U.S. trade volume in 2016),\12\ more traditional institutional investors have shown reduced holding periods as well. A 2013 survey showed that 96% of institutional investors executed round-trip trades that lasted less than one month, with 23% of their trading volume relating to trades that are held for less than three months.\13\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See, e.g., Dominic Barton, Capitalism for the Long Term, Harvard Business Review (March 2011), available at https://hbr.org/2011/03/capitalism-for-the-long-term; Tragedy of the Horizon Project, The Long and Winding Road: How Long-Only Equity Managers Turn Over Their Portfolios Every 1.7 Years (February 2017), available at http://www.tragedyofthehorizon.com/The-Long-And-Winding-Road.pdf; Martin Cremers, Ankur Pareek and Zacharias Sautner, Short-Term Investors, Long-Term Investments, and Firm Value (March 14, 2017), available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2720248; Alana Semuels, How to Stop Short-Term Thinking at America's Companies, The Atlantic (December 30, 2016), available at https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/12/short-term-thinking/511874; Roger L. Martin, Yes, Short-Termism Really is a Problem, Harvard Business Review (October 9, 2015), available at https://hbr.org/2015/10/yes-short-termism-really-is-a-problem. \11\ New York Stock Exchange, Annual Reported Volume, Turnover Rate, Reported Trades (2004), available at http://www.nyxdata.com/nysedata/asp/factbook/viewer_edition.asp?mode=table&key=2206&category=4; World Bank, Stocks Traded, Turnover Ratio of Domestic Shares (2015), available at https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/CM.MKT.TRNR?end=2015&locations=US&start=1975 (hereinafter ``Turnover Ratio of Domestic Shares''). \12\ Ana Avramovic, Credit Suisse Market Commentary: We're All High-Frequency Traders Now (March 15, 2017), available at https://edge.credit-suisse.com/edge/Public/Bulletin/Servefile.aspx?FileID=28410&m=-1290757752. \13\ Bidisha Chakrabarty, Pamela C. Moulton and Charles Trzcinka, Institutional Holding Periods (April 29, 2013), available at https://scholarship.sha.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=conf. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Some commenters believe that current public market dynamics subject public companies to intense pressure to meet quarterly performance targets, resulting in negative consequences for long-term value creation.\14\ One study found that 80% of chief financial officers of public companies acknowledge that they would forego long-term value creation initiatives like research and development in order to avoid missing quarterly targets.\15\ Further, a 2013 [[Page 14076]] study found that companies projected to just miss their earnings per share (``EPS'') forecasts by a few cents are significantly more likely to repurchase shares than companies that beat their EPS forecasts by a few cents, suggesting efforts to increase EPS through financial engineering rather than growth.\16\ At the same time, this study found that in the calendar year following repurchases, these same companies decreased their number of employees, investment in research and development, and capital expenditures, which the study authors found suggests that these companies may have been willing to forego investment in long-term growth in order to meet short-term financial targets.\17\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ McKinsey Global Institute, Measuring the Economic Impact of Short-Termism (February 2017), available at http://www.mckinsey.com/ ~/media/mckinsey/global%20themes/long%20term%20capitalism/ where%20companies%20with%20a%20long%20term%20view%20outperform%20thei r%20peers/measuring-the-economic-impact-of-short-termism.ashx. C.f. James B. Stewart, Amazon Says Long Term And Means It, N.Y. Times (December 16, 2011) (noting Amazon.com's willingness to invest in long-term initiatives notwithstanding the impact on its short-term quarterly earnings). \15\ John R. Graham, Campbell R. Harvey, Shiva Rajgopal, Value Destruction and Financial Reporting Decisions (September 6, 2006), available at https://www0.gsb.columbia.edu/mygsb/faculty/research/pubfiles/12924/Rajgopal_value.pdf (``80% of survey participants report that they would decrease discretionary spending on R&D, advertising and maintenance to meet an earnings target''). \16\ Heitor Almeida, Vyacheslav Fos, Mathias Kronlund, The Real Effects of Share Repurchases (June 8, 2015), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2276156. \17\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The greater focus on short-term financial performance noted by these commenters also coincides with a reduction in the number of private companies seeking to undertake initial public offerings (``IPOs'') and list their shares on the U.S. public markets. From 2001 through 2016, the U.S. averaged approximately one-third of the IPOs per year than it did each year between 1998 and 2000.\18\ Calendar year 2016 had the fewest number of IPOs since the financial crisis years of 2008 and 2009,\19\ although there was a relative increase in 2017.\20\ The total number of listed companies in the United States also fell by almost 50% in the twenty year period from 1996 through 2016, down from over 8,000 companies listed on U.S. exchanges in 1996 to 4,333 in June of 2016.\21\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \18\ Jay R. Ritter, Initial Public Offerings: Updated Statistics (August 8, 2017), available at https://site.warrington.ufl.edu/ritter/files/2017/08/IPOs2016Statistics.pdf. \19\ Id. \20\ Ernst & Young, Global IPO Trends: Q3 2017 (2017), available at http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/ey-global-ipo-trends-q3- 2017/$FILE/ey-global-ipo-trends-q3-2017.pdf (noting 111 IPOs in the U.S. through the third quarter of 2017, a 35% increase year-over- year). \21\ See U.S. Dept. of the Treasury, A Financial System that Creates Economic Opportunities: Capital Markets at p. 21 (October 2017), available at https://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Documents/A-Financial-System-Capital-Markets-FINAL-FINAL.pdf. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- This decline is driven by fewer companies going public, existing public companies going private or merging with other public companies, and those companies that undertake an IPO doing so at a much later stage. Between 1980 and 2000, companies that went public typically did so about 7.6 years after founding.\22\ Since then, that timespan has grown longer; between 2001 and 2016, the average age of a company at its IPO was nearly 12 years.\23\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \22\ Ritter, supra note 18. \23\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange believes that these trends have significant consequences for companies, investors, and the economy as a whole. A 2011 report by the IPO Task Force reported that ``up to 22 million jobs may have been lost'' as a result of the decline in IPOs.\24\ The trend toward companies staying private also limits the investment opportunities for ordinary investors,\25\ as most retail investors are not ``accredited investors'' eligible to invest in private placements pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D \26\ under the Securities Act of 1933.\27\ Although institutional investors may provide the investment capital that these companies need, some have voiced concerns that private markets lack the transparency, liquidity, price discovery, and protections of the public marketplace.\28\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \24\ IPO Task Force, Rebuilding the IPO On-Ramp (October 20, 2011), available at https://www.sec.gov/info/smallbus/acsec/rebuilding_the_ipo_on-ramp.pdf. \25\ See U.S. Dept. of the Treasury, A Financial System that Creates Economic Opportunities: Capital Markets at p. 27 (October 2017), available at https://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Documents/A-Financial-System-Capital-Markets-FINAL-FINAL.pdf (``If a company decides not to go public and instead raises capital in the private market or as an exempt offering, it could be subject to investor qualification requirements and/or offering limitations. This could result in the average investor being deprived of an opportunity to consider investing in that enterprise.''). \26\ 17 CFR 230.506. \27\ 15 U.S.C. 77a et seq. \28\ Commissioner Kara M. Stein, Lighting our Capital Markets (July 11, 2017), available at https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/stein-lighting-our-capital-markets-071117. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Although there are a number of potential causes for the decline in the number of IPOs and the number of public companies,\29\ some commenters believe that the short-term pressures placed on public companies have discouraged some newer companies from conducting initial public offerings,\30\ and have led others to go private.\31\ Indeed, even when newer companies do undertake an IPO, in recent years many have sought to do so in a way that limits the public market's short- term pressures, by retaining for the founders much of the voting control.\32\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \29\ Jay R. Ritter, Xiaohui Gao Bakshi, Zhu, Zhongyan, Where Have All the IPOs Gone? (August 26, 2013), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1954788 (hypothesizing that economies of scope make it more attractive for companies to sell themselves to a larger organization than remain independent); Elisabeth de Fontenay, The Deregulation of Private Capital and the Decline of the Public Company, Duke Law School Public Law & Legal Theory Series No. 2017-33 (April 11, 2017), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2951158 (suggesting that the easing of regulation on private securities offerings and transactions have decreased the incentive for firms to become public); PwC, Considering an IPO? The costs of going and being public may surprise you (September 2012), available at http://www.pwc.com/us/en/deals/publications/assets/pwc-cost-of-ipo.pdf (discussing cost of initial IPO and remaining public); Michael J. Mauboussin, The Incredible Shrinking Universe of Stocks, Credit Suisse Global Financial Strategies (March 22, 2017), available at https://research-doc.credit-suisse.com/docView?language=ENG&format=PDF&sourceid=em&document_id=1072753661&serialid=h%2B%2FwLdU%2FTIaitAx1rnamfYsPRAuTFRGdTSF4HZIvTkA%3D (suggesting causes including regulatory compliance costs, increased merger and acquisition activity, and availability of late-stage venture capital). \30\ Avi Steinlauf, The Case for Staying Private (and Why IPOs Are Overrated), Inc., available at https://www.inc.com/avi-steinlauf/why-we-are-staying-private.html (arguing that public companies are subject to ``short-term market players [that] have no vested long-term interest'' in the company, while ``private organizations can preserve their focus on what is truly best for the organization's overall success''); Maureen Farrell, America's Roster of Public Companies Is Shrinking Before Our Eyes, Wall Street Journal (January 6, 2017), available at https://www.wsj.com/articles/americas-roster-of-public-companies-is-shrinking-before-our-eyes-1483545879 (citing University of Michigan Ross School of Business professor Jerry Davis, who believes that ``[t]he dangers of being a public company are really evident,'' among them, ``having an investor base that clamors for short-term stock gains''); Jonathan Macey, As IPOs Decline, the Market is Becoming More Elitist, L.A. Times (January 10, 2017), available at http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-macey-ipo-democracy-20170110-story.html (Op-Ed by professor Macey noting, among other things, that ``[o]ne drawback to going public is shareholders' sometimes excessive focus on short- term stock price fluctuations''). \31\ See, e.g., Michael Dell, Going Private is Paying Off for Dell, Wall Street Journal (November 24, 2014) (``As a private company, Dell now has the freedom to take a long-term view. No more pulling R&D and growth investments to make in-quarter numbers . . . No more trade-offs between what's best for a short-term return and what's best for the long-term success of our customers''). \32\ Wall Street Journal Business Blog, The Big Number (August 17, 2015), available at https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-big-number-1439865699; Ken Bertsch, Snap and the Rise of No-Vote Common Shares, Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation (May 26, 2017), available at https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2017/05/26/snap-and-the-rise-of-no-vote-common-shares. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (B) Listing Standards for Long-Term Focused Companies and Investors The Exchange believes that companies should be able to maintain a public listing on an exchange that provides a differentiated choice for issuers and investors that prefer listing standards explicitly designed to promote long-term value creation. While all companies that may list on the Exchange can focus on long-term value creation, providing a listing category with listing rules that address some of [[Page 14077]] the concerns regarding short-termism could encourage greater participation in the public markets by long-term focused companies and investors, potentially increasing the number of companies willing to become public. The Exchange understands that LTSE engaged in a multiyear effort to develop the LTSE Listings Rules based on its analysis of academic research, market experience, and input from a wide variety of long-term focused stakeholders. The LTSE Listings Rules are designed to promote the interests of companies that seek to focus on long-term value creation as well as the transparency and governance concerns of long- term focused investors. LTSE's analysis found that, although individual stakeholders may favor or disfavor particular LTSE Listings Rules, long-term focused companies and investors' concerns with particular LTSE Listings Rules were offset by the benefits they saw from the package of the LTSE Listings Rules as a whole. The Exchange acknowledges that many, if not all, of the proposed requirements contained in the LTSE Listings Rules could be undertaken voluntarily by any company even in the absence of the LTSE Listings category. However, the Exchange understands that many long-term focused investors indicated to LTSE that they would view a company that affirmatively chose to list on an exchange (or listing category thereof) that required compliance with these rules, therefore subjecting itself to compliance as a regulatory condition to continued listing, as demonstrating a greater commitment to long-term focus than one that voluntarily undertook to abide by similar practices, but could readily choose to change its practices thereafter. In addition, because an exchange, as a self-regulatory organization, is required to monitor and enforce compliance with its rules,\33\ the Exchange believes that long-term focused investors appreciate and have confidence in the oversight that a national securities exchange provides to ensure that a company complies with its exchange listing obligations. Similarly, the Exchange understands that many long-term focused companies believe that they would be better able to withstand short-term pressures if they were subject to rules that explicitly required them to disclose actions promoting a long-term focus. Further, rather than each company acting independently, requiring investors to analyze each company's governance separately, investors familiar with LTSE Listings would quickly know the rules that apply to an LTSE Listings Issuer. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \33\ See 15 U.S.C. 78s(g)(1)(A). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange has entered into an arrangement with LTSE to authorize the Exchange to make the LTSE Listings Rules available as a listing category of the Exchange. Through extensive discussions, LTSE has provided the Exchange with background information on the purpose of each of the LTSE Listings Rules, with which the Exchange agrees. As a result, statements herein that describe the Exchange's belief are informed by information provided by LTSE. Although the LTSE Listings Rules were developed by LTSE, the Exchange will retain full self- regulatory responsibility for determining initial and continuing compliance with the Exchange's listing standards, including for those companies that elect to be subject to the LTSE Listings Rules. In conducting its LTSE Listings business, IEX will retain, as its agents, a small number of staff that also are employed by LTSE (the ``LTSE Listings Agents''), but will not receive regulatory services from LTSE itself. The sole responsibility of LTSE Listings Agents will be to provide IEX with expertise in interpreting the LTSE Listings Rules and assistance in conducting the LTSE Listings business, and their involvement will not extend to other matters within the Exchange's jurisdiction. The LTSE Listings Agents will be subject to the Exchange's oversight and regulatory authority as the responsible self- regulatory organization.\34\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \34\ Notwithstanding the services provided by the LTSE Listings Agents to the Exchange, all actions taken by the Exchange will ultimately be based on the Exchange's determination that the action is appropriate and consistent with the Act, the Commission's rules thereunder and the Exchange's rules. Pursuant to the Exchange's retention of LTSE Listings Agents, the LTSE Listings Agents will provide certain advisory, marketing, public communications, and sales services to IEX in connection with LTSE Listings. For example, LTSE Listings Agents will evaluate issuers seeking to list on the Exchange under the LTSE Listings Rules and will assist in monitoring LTSE Listings Issuers for compliance with the LTSE Listing Rules. The Exchange expects that the LTSE Chief Regulatory Officer will be a LTSE Listings Agent (and other LTSE regulatory personnel that do not have direct involvement in LTSE's commercial operations may also be retained by the Exchange to serve as LTSE Listings Agents). At all times, LTSE Listings Agents will be subject to the satisfaction and the oversight of the Exchange's Chief Regulatory Officer, with all actions proposed by LTSE Listings Agents subject to the Exchange's regulatory authority. Separately, the Exchange will permit LTSE to use and redistribute written marketing, public communications, and sales materials concerning the LTSE Listings business, subject to the Exchange's consent (not to be unreasonably withheld). Further, the Exchange's arrangement with LTSE Listings Agents is subject to important restrictions designed to protect the Exchange's responsibilities as a self-regulatory organization and the confidentiality of its books and records pertaining thereto. First, each LTSE Listings Agent is considered to be an agent of the Exchange in connection with performance of services under the Exchange's arrangement with LTSE, pursuant to Article XI, Section 4 of the Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of Investors' Exchange LLC. Thus, as appropriate, information pertaining to the self-regulatory function of the Exchange may be made available to a LTSE Listings Agent to the extent necessary or appropriate to properly discharge the self-regulatory responsibilities of the Exchange. However, pursuant to the Exchange's arrangement with LTSE, the Exchange will not share confidential regulatory information with LTSE (other than with LTSE regulatory personnel that are LTSE Listings Agents and that do not have direct involvement in LTSE's commercial operations). Additionally, LTSE has agreed that each LTSE Listings Agent will be required to consent in writing to the application to them of the following provisions, which are consistent with Article VII of the Bylaws of IEX Group, Inc.: Non- interference with, and due regard for, the Exchange's self- regulatory function; confidentiality of the Exchange's books and records pertaining to its self-regulatory function; maintenance of books and records related to services under the Exchange's arrangement with LTSE and services provided to the Exchange by LTSE Listings Agents at a location within the United States; compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder and cooperation with the SEC in respect of the SEC's oversight responsibilities regarding the Exchange and the self-regulatory functions and responsibilities of the Exchange; and consent to jurisdiction of the United States federal courts, the SEC and the Exchange for purposes of any suit, action or proceeding arising out of or relating to services provided to the Exchange and the Exchange's arrangement with LTSE. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (3) Proposed LTSE Listings Rules The proposed LTSE Listings Rules that would apply to LTSE Listings Issuers fall into five general categories: (i) Board of directors and committee requirements, (ii) rules requiring supplemental long-term disclosures, (iii) rules requiring long-term alignment of executive compensation, (iv) rules requiring long-term shareholder voting structure, and (v) certain other rules that further encourage LTSE Listings Issuers to focus on long-term value creation. In addition, the Exchange is proposing rules that would clarify the application of certain existing Exchange rules to LTSE Listings Issuers. (A) Board of Directors and Committee Requirements The proposed LTSE Listings Rules would create new requirements for the boards of directors and board committees of LTSE Listings Issuers designed to align the board with the objectives of the LTSE Listings Rules. Specifically, the LTSE Listings Rules would require each LTSE Listings Issuer to establish a board committee dedicated to overseeing the issuer's strategies for creating and sustaining long-term growth and a committee dedicated to selecting or recommending qualified director nominees. The LTSE Listings Rules would also impose [[Page 14078]] additional obligations on audit committees and compensation committees designed to increase oversight and transparency, among other things. These corporate governance requirements are discussed further below. (i) Long-Term Strategy and Product Committee Proposed Rule 14A.405(c)(1) would require that each LTSE Listings Issuer's board of directors maintain a committee specifically dedicated to overseeing the LTSE Listings Issuer's strategic plans for long-term growth (the ``LTSP Committee''). Proposed Rule 14A.405(c)(3) would require that an LTSE Listings Issuer adopt a formal written LTSP Committee charter (and that the LTSP Committee will review and reassess the adequacy of the charter on an annual basis) specifying, among other things, the scope of the LTSP Committee's responsibilities, and how it will carry out those responsibilities, including structure, processes and membership requirements, and that the LTSP Committee must report regularly to the board of directors. The requirement to report regularly is intended to ensure that the board of directors has insight into the LTSP Committee's work and input into the LTSE Listings Issuer's strategic objectives. Although LTSE Listings Issuers would have some flexibility in designing their LTSP Committee, in order to ensure that adequate board focus is placed on long-term strategy, proposed Rule 14A.405(c)(4) would require that the LTSP Committee include a minimum of three members of the board and that a majority of the LTSP Committee members be independent. This majority independence requirement is intended to mitigate potential conflicts of interest and ensure that outside perspectives are brought into discussions and decisions regarding the company's long-term strategy. Proposed Rule 14A.405(c)(3)(C) would require that the LTSP Committee's charter be made available on or through the LTSE Listings Issuer's website. The Exchange believes that increased transparency about the LTSP Committee's functions and policies is in the best interest of investors, and companies that hold themselves to a set of long-term standards should make such information available. The Exchange notes that Item 407 of Regulation S-K \35\ requires that a public company's audit, nominating and compensation committee charters be either available to security holders on the company's website or as an appendix to its proxy or information statement provided to security holders at least once every three fiscal years, or if the charter has been materially amended since the beginning of the company's last fiscal year. The Exchange understands that many long-term focused investors expect to be able to readily access corporate governance information, such as board committee charters, on a company's website rather than by searching through a company's SEC filings, and accordingly the Exchange believes that it is appropriate to explicitly impose this requirement. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \35\ 17 CFR 229.407. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Proposed Rule 14A.405(c)(2) would provide LTSE Listings Issuers with additional flexibility by permitting the board of directors to allocate the LTSP Committee's responsibilities to committees of their own denomination, provided that the committee (i) is subject to a formal written charter that satisfies the requirements of proposed Rule 14A.405(c)(3), including that such committee report regularly to the board of directors, and (ii) complies with the committee composition requirements set forth in proposed Rule 14A.405(c)(4). However, proposed Rule 14A.405(c)(1) would prohibit the LTSP Committee from assuming any roles or responsibilities that are required to be undertaken by an LTSE Listings Issuer's independent board committees, since the LTSP Committee is not required to be composed of all independent directors. (ii) Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee IEX Rule 14.405(e)(1)(A) requires that director nominees may be selected (or recommended for selection by the board of directors) by either independent directors constituting a majority of the board's independent directors or a nominations committee compromised solely of independent directors. With respect to LTSE Listings Issuers, proposed Rule 14A.405(d)(1) would require that director nominees must be selected (or recommended for selection by the board of directors) by a nominating/corporate governance committee comprised solely of independent directors, rather than independent directors constituting a majority of the board's independent directors. The Exchange believes that, in view of the differentiated focus of the LTSE Listings category, requiring LTSE Listings Issuers to maintain a separate, independent nominating/corporate governance committee would better facilitate selection of directors that are aligned with such focus. In addition, another national securities exchange has a substantially similar requirement, requiring that listed companies select director nominees through a separate nominating committee composed entirely of independent directors.\36\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \36\ See NYSE Listed Company Manual, Rule 303A.04. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notwithstanding the requirement that the nominating/corporate governance committee be comprised solely of independent directors, proposed Rule 14A.405(d)(2) would provide that the nominating/corporate governance committee may include a non-independent director if the board, under exceptional and limited circumstances, determines that such individual's membership on the committee is required by the best interests of an LTSE Listings Issuer and its shareholders and certain other conditions are satisfied. In addition, proposed Rule 14A.405(d)(3) would provide that exclusively independent director oversight of director nominations shall not be required in cases where the right to nominate a director legally belongs to a third party; provided that an LTSE Listings Issuer would still be obligated to comply with all committee composition requirements. These limited exceptions are consistent with exceptions contained in the Exchange's corresponding rules for companies other than LTSE Listings Issuers.\37\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \37\ See IEX Rules 14.405(e)(3) and (4). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IEX Rule 14.405(e)(5) provides that the requirements regarding director nominations set forth in IEX Rule 14.405 do not apply if the issuer is subject to a binding obligation that requires a director nomination structure inconsistent with IEX Rule 14.405 and such obligation pre-dates the approval of IEX Rule 14.405. Proposed Rule 14A.405(d)(4), however, would provide that LTSE Listings Issuers may not rely on this exception. The Exchange believes that this provision, which would permit a nomination process and board composition based on a pre-existing obligation that pre-dates when the IEX rules were approved, is inconsistent with the goal of allowing longer-term shareholders to gain voting rights over time and the flexibility is unnecessary given that the required timing for the pre-existing obligation is so limited. Proposed Rule 14A.405(d)(6)(A) would require that each LTSE Listings Issuer adopt a formal written nominating/corporate governance committee charter (and that the nominating/corporate governance committee review and reassess the adequacy of the formal written charter [[Page 14079]] on an annual basis) specifying, among other things, the scope of the nominating/corporate governance committee's responsibilities, and how it will carry out those responsibilities, including structure, processes and membership requirements, and that the nominating/ corporate governance committee must report regularly to the board of directors. The explicit requirement to report regularly is intended to ensure that the board of directors has insight into the nominating/ corporate governance committee's work. Proposed Rule 14A.405(d)(6)(B) would require that the nominating/ corporate governance committee's charter be made available on or through an LTSE Listings Issuer's website. The Exchange believes that increased transparency about the nominating/corporate governance committee's functions and policies is in the best interest of long-term investors, and companies that hold themselves to a set of long-term standards should make such information available. The Exchange notes that Item 407 of Regulation S-K \38\ requires that a public company's nominating committee charter be either available to security holders on the company's website or as an appendix to its proxy or information statement provided to security holders at least once every three fiscal years, or if the charter has been materially amended since the beginning of the company's last fiscal year. The Exchange understands that many long-term focused investors expect to be able to readily access corporate governance information, such as board committee charters, on a company's website rather than by searching through a company's SEC filings, and accordingly the Exchange believes that it is appropriate to explicitly impose this requirement. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \38\ 17 CFR 229.407. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Proposed Rule 14A.405(d)(5) would provide LTSE Listings Issuers additional flexibility by permitting the board of directors to allocate the nominating/corporate governance committee's responsibilities to committees of their own denomination, provided that the committee is comprised entirely of independent directors and that such committee is subject to a formal written charter that satisfies the requirements of proposed Rule 14A.405(d)(6), including that such committee report regularly to the board of directors. (iii) Additional Audit Committee and Compensation Committee Requirements As is the case with all issuers listed on the Exchange, LTSE Listings Issuers are required to comply with the audit committee and compensation committee requirements set forth in IEX Rules 14.405(c) and (d). LTSE Listings Issuers, however, would additionally be required to comply with audit committee and compensation committee requirements set forth in proposed Rule 14A.405. Specifically, under proposed Rules 14A.405(a) and 14A.405(b)(2), the audit committee and compensation committee charters must specify that each committee will report regularly to the board of directors. While the Exchange believes that it is inherent in any public company's board and committee organizational structure that board committees report regularly to the board, in view of the focus of the LTSE Listings category, the Exchange also believes it is appropriate to make this requirement explicit for LTSE Listings Issuers. In addition, the charters of each of the audit committee and compensation committee must be made available on or through an LTSE Listings Issuer's website. The Exchange notes that Item 407 of Regulation S-K \39\ under the Securities Act of 1933 \40\ requires that a public company's audit and compensation committee charters be either available to security holders on the company's website or as an appendix to its proxy or information statement provided to security holders at least once every three fiscal years, or if the charter has been materially amended since the beginning of the company's last fiscal year. The Exchange understands that many long-term focused investors expect to be able to readily access corporate governance information, such as board committee charters, on a company's website rather than by searching through a company's SEC filings, and accordingly the Exchange believes that it is appropriate to explicitly impose this requirement. The Exchange further notes that another national securities exchange requires companies listed on their exchange to meet similar requirements with respect to their audit committee and compensation committee.\41\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \39\ 17 CFR 229.407. \40\ 15 U.S.C. 77a et seq. \41\ See NYSE Listed Company Manual, Rules 303A.05(b) and 303A.07(b). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In addition to the foregoing charter requirements, proposed Rule 14A.405(b)(2)(A)(ii) would require that the compensation committee charter specify that the compensation committee must adopt executive compensation guidelines. Proposed requirements with respect to executive compensation guidelines are described under ``Long-Term Alignment of Executive Compensation'' below. Proposed Rule 14A.405(b)(1) would provide LTSE Listings Issuers additional flexibility by permitting the board of directors to allocate the compensation committee's responsibilities to committees of their own denomination, provided that the committee is comprised entirely of independent directors and that such committee is subject to a formal written charter that satisfies the requirements of IEX Rule 14.405(d)(1) and proposed Rule 14A.405(b)(2), including that such committee report regularly to the board of directors. (iv) Corporate Governance Guidelines Pursuant to proposed Rule 14A.409, each LTSE Listings Issuer would be required to adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines. These corporate governance guidelines would be required to address director qualification standards, director responsibilities, director access to management, and director orientation and continuing education, among other things. In view of the differentiated focus of the LTSE Listings category, the Exchange believes that increased disclosure about the company's approach to corporate governance through the adoption and disclosure of corporate governance guidelines is appropriate for LTSE Listings Issuers. In addition, the Exchange notes that the proposed corporate governance guideline requirements are similar to the requirements imposed by the listing rules of another national securities exchange.\42\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \42\ See NYSE Listed Company Manual, Rule 303A.09. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Although proposed Rule 14A.409 would generally track the New York Stock Exchange's (``NYSE'') corporate governance guidelines requirements, the LTSE Listings Rules would deviate from these requirements in certain respects. Specifically, proposed Rule 14A.409(a)(4) would require that a significant portion--no less than 40%--of director compensation be paid in stock-based compensation tied to long-term periods. An LTSE Listings Issuer would be required to disclose in its corporate governance guidelines what it considers to be ``long-term'' for this purpose. In addition, this proposed rule would require that LTSE Listings Issuers adopt director stock ownership guidelines, which must include minimum ownership requirements that can be met over the length of board service. These provisions are designed to ensure that LTSE Listings Issuers [[Page 14080]] incentivize directors to focus on the long-term, but also provide LTSE Listings Issuers with flexibility to design their own plans for director compensation. In addition, the Exchange does not believe that these requirements would impose a significant burden on LTSE Listings Issuers, as the Exchange believes that issuers have already trended toward having equity represent a large portion of director compensation.\43\ Proposed Rule 14A.409(a)(4) would also provide that LTSE Listings Issuers consider other means of aligning director compensation with long-term strategies, including deferred share delivery, vesting periods or similar measures. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \43\ See Yaron Nili, Trends in Board of Director Compensation, HLS Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation (April 13, 2015), available at https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2015/04/13/trends-in-board-of-director-compensation. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (B) Long-Term Strategy and Product Disclosures The Exchange understands that LTSE's analysis indicated that long- term investors generally value information regarding a company's long- term plans and objectives, that may not otherwise be required to be disclosed. In particular, this information could (i) provide long-term investors with greater information upon which to evaluate a company's progress toward long-term goals and (ii) allow companies to be evaluated based on whether they are making prudent management and strategic decisions that investors believe enhance long-term growth. The proposed LTSE Listings Rules would therefore require--in addition to and separate from all disclosures required under applicable securities laws, the Commission's rules and the Exchange's other rules--that LTSE Listings Issuers provide certain supplemental disclosures regarding an LTSE Listings Issuer's long-term strategy and products (the ``LTSP Disclosures'').\44\ The LTSP Disclosure requirements are supplemental to and would not supersede or impact other disclosure obligations. The LTSP Disclosures would be subject to all securities law requirements just as other public company disclosures. Proposed Rule 14A.207(a) would remind LTSE Listings Issuers that all disclosures must comply with applicable law and Commission rules and regulations, including rules and regulations pertaining to the use and reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures and any securities law obligations regarding updating or correcting prior public statements or disclosures. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \44\ An LTSE Listings Issuer would be required to include its LTSP Disclosures in its Annual Report Supplement. See infra Section II.A.1.(3)(B)(v) (Location and Manner of LTSP Disclosures). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (i) Disclosure of Long-Term Growth Strategy Proposed Rule 14A.207(c) would require each LTSE Listings Issuer to include in its LTSP Disclosures a discussion of the company's ``Long- Term Growth Strategy.'' Long-Term Growth Strategy would be defined for these purposes as ``the strategy, as determined by management and the board of directors and approved by the LTSP Committee, that is focused on achieving long-term growth.'' \45\ This requirement is designed to increase transparency for shareholders on the strategic goals of the company's managers and provide for greater alignment and accountability between a company's long-term vision and investor expectations. By disclosing a Long-Term Growth Strategy, managers have the opportunity to explain to shareholders the long-term goals and objectives specific to their company, and then be held responsible for achieving those objectives. While the disclosure of the Long-Term Growth Strategy must include the information described below, an LTSE Listings Issuer is otherwise free to design its Long-Term Growth Strategy with the explicit oversight and approval of its LTSP Committee. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \45\ See proposed Rule 14A.002(a)(11). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Proposed Rule 14A.207(c)(1)(A) would require that each Long-Term Growth Strategy disclosure describe how the LTSE Listings Issuer defines ``long-term'' for purposes of its Long-Term Growth Strategy and how it made this determination.\46\ Under proposed Rule 14A.207(c)(1)(B), LTSE Listings Issuers would be required to include in the Long-Term Growth Strategy disclosure a discussion of the ``Leading Indicators'' that the company uses to measure its progress toward its long-term goals. ``Leading Indicators'' are defined as those quantitative metrics, either financial or non-financial, that an LTSE Listings Issuer's management uses to help it forecast revenue, profit, or other common after-the-event measures of long-term success.\47\ By way of example, a biotech company may use as a Leading Indicator the number of patents it has obtained. A media company, on the other hand, may prefer to use as a Leading Indicator the number of page views or ad clicks its website has received. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \46\ The Exchange understands that LTSE Listings Issuers in different industries may have different definitions of ``long- term.'' For example, a pharmaceutical company that must spend years researching and testing the efficacy of a proposed new drug may have a much longer definition of ``long-term'' than a clothing retailer. \47\ See proposed Rule 14A.002(a)(10). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- LTSE Listings Issuers must also discuss key milestones that the LTSE Listings Issuer aims to achieve with respect to its Leading Indicators and must report on the progress the LTSE Listings Issuer has made in achieving these key milestones. The LTSP Disclosures require use of Leading Indicators and key milestones so that companies may define and share with investors those long-term metrics that the company itself views as critical to measuring its success, providing investors insight into the company's internal analysis and allowing investors to consider the company's progress towards these long-term goals. Proposed Rule 14A.207(c)(1)(C) would require that each Long-Term Growth Strategy disclosure include a discussion of any changes to an LTSE Listings Issuer's Long-Term Growth Strategy since its last publication, including changes to Leading Indicators and/or key milestones. An LTSE Listings Issuer's Long-Term Growth Strategy may evolve as its business develops and new goals are created or changed. This disclosure requirement would provide greater transparency by ensuring that long-term investors are made aware of any such changes to the issuer's Long-Term Growth Strategy and are able to measure an LTSE Listings Issuer's progress toward these goals. Pursuant to proposed Rule 14A.207(c)(2), the Long-Term Growth Strategy must include details relating to different businesses of the LTSE Listings Issuer if the information is material to the overall strategy. The purpose of this proposed rule is to account for the fact that issuers may have diverse businesses with different strategic objectives. For example, a company may operate in multiple industries or have products tailored to different markets. This rule requires LTSE Listings Issuers to provide information relating to different strategies if such information is material to the broader long-term strategy. While transparency into long-term strategy is an important goal and critical for long-term focused investors, in certain situations the Exchange understands that public disclosure of this information could risk competitive harm to the company. In these limited situations, proposed Rule 14A.207(c)(3) would provide an exemption. Specifically, if an LTSE Listings Issuer's LTSP Committee makes a determination that disclosure of any aspect of the LTSE Listings Issuer's Long-Term [[Page 14081]] Growth Strategy would be ``reasonably likely to result in material harm'' to the company's competitive position, the LTSE Listings Issuer could exclude such information from its LTSP Disclosures, so long as the LTSE Listings Issuer complies with all applicable securities laws.\48\ Any such determination would be required to be documented by the LTSP Committee and made in accordance with its fiduciary duties. In addition, proposed Rule 14A.405(c)(3)(B)(iv) would require that an LTSE Listings Issuer's LTSP Committee develop and disclose in its charter a process for making this determination and for determining that withholding the disclosure would not contravene any applicable securities laws. In order to ensure that investors are aware that the LTSP Disclosures of an LTSE Listings Issuer relying on this exemption are incomplete, proposed Rule 14A.207(c)(3) would require that such an LTSE Listings Issuer disclose in its LTSP Disclosures that it is withholding certain information as a result of competitive concerns. To ensure that investors have the opportunity to assess the judgment of the LTSP Committee regarding the withholding of competitive information, upon the time that any withheld information is no longer competitively sensitive, proposed Rule 14A.207(c)(3) would require that an LTSE Listings Issuer disclose that information in its LTSP Disclosures, even though this information may no longer be relevant to its current Long-Term Growth Strategy. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \48\ This proposed requirement has the same objective as Instruction 4 of Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K, which provides that an SEC reporting company is not required to disclose in SEC filings certain information regarding compensation ``involving confidential trade secrets or confidential commercial or financial information, the disclosure of which would result in competitive harm for the registrant.'' See also Question 118.04 of Regulation S-K Questions and Answers of General Applicability (September 21, 2017), available at https://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/guidance/regs-kinterp.htm. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (ii) Disclosure Related to Buybacks As noted above,\49\ particular concern has been raised regarding the risk that some companies pressured to meet short-term goals may spend cash to repurchase their own shares rather than on making long- term investments. As a result, the Exchange believes that some long- term investors are particularly interested in enhanced disclosure regarding companies' share repurchase activity. Proposed Rule 14A.207(d) would therefore require that each LTSE Listings Issuer disclose certain information relating to ``Buybacks'' or issuer repurchases in addition to those required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 703 of Regulation S-K \50\ under the Securities Act of 1933.\51\ Specifically, under proposed Rule 14A.207(d) each LTSE Listings Issuer would be required to disclose in its LTSP Disclosures its ``EPS Net of Buybacks,'' defined in proposed LTSE Listings Rule 14A.002(a)(6) as the quotient calculated by dividing (i) net income (as reported in the LTSE Listings Issuer's financial statements in its most recent Annual Report) by (ii) the sum of outstanding shares and shares that were subject to a Buyback during the prior fiscal year. This disclosure requirement is designed to provide investors with transparency into the impact of Buybacks on a company earnings per share for any particular period, i.e., by indicating what the company's earnings-per-share would have been had the company not engaged in repurchases. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \49\ See supra notes 16-17 and accompanying text. \50\ 17 CFR 229.703. \51\ 15 U.S.C. 77a et seq. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (iii) Disclosure Related to Human Capital Investment Proposed Rule 14A.207(e) would require that each LTSE Listings Issuer disclose in its LTSP Disclosures the extent to which the LTSE Listings Issuer's selling, general and administrative expenses (``SG&A'') (as reported in the LTSE Listings Issuer's most recent Annual Report) \52\ consisted of ``Human Capital Investment.'' For these purposes, ``Human Capital Investment'' refers to the aggregate amount an LTSE Listings Issuer spends on formal training of workers in new skills to improve job performance, including, among other things, fees or expenses related to personnel hired or retained to train employees, training materials, tuition assistance and continuing education or similar programs. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \52\ ``Annual Report'' is defined in Proposed Rule 14A.002(a)(1) as ``consistent with IEX Rule 14.207(d), the annual report made available to Shareholders containing audited financial statements of the LTSE Listings Issuer and its subsidiaries (which, for example, may be on Form 10-K, 20-F, 40-F or N-CSR) within a reasonable period of time following the filing of the annual report with the Commission.'' --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Each LTSE Listings Issuer must also disclose the amount spent on Human Capital Investment per full-time equivalent employee. The Exchange understands that long-term investors generally are interested in this metric, and the disclosure requirement is thus designed to enable long-term investors to conduct a comparative analysis of Human Capital Investment per employee across LTSE Listings Issuers of different sizes. The costs related to Human Capital Investment are generally accounted for within SG&A, and therefore considered an expense rather than an investment. The Exchange understands that long-term focused investors and companies believe that it is in the long-term interest of companies to make investments in their workforce to retain them and improve their skills. Although, as an accounting matter, these may be viewed as a short-term costs, the Exchange believes that long-term focused investors value information regarding the extent to which companies are making investments in the long-term development and success of its employees. (iv) Disclosure Related to Research and Development The Exchange understands that investments in research and development (``R&D'') are generally considered long-term investments for companies. LTSE's analysis indicated that additional data on R&D investment is particularly sought after by long-term focused investors. Therefore, proposed Rule 14A.207(f) would require that each LTSE Listings Issuer disclose in its LTSP Disclosures the amount of R&D spending that is short-term focused and the amount that is long-term focused. This requirement is intended to provide investors with greater transparency into an LTSE Listings Issuer's planning and goals around R&D programs, particularly in light of the risk that a company may under-invest in R&D in order to meet shorter-term financial metrics. Because each company and industry differs in its definition of long- term and short-term time horizons, proposed Rule 14A.207(f) provides flexibility by allowing LTSE Listings Issuers to determine their own definitions of short-term and long-term R&D programs, provided that an LTSE Listings Issuer disclose the definitions used and the process by which they determined them. (v) Location and Manner of LTSP Disclosures Proposed Rule 14A.207(b) would require an LTSE Listings Issuer to make its LTSP Disclosures publicly available pursuant to a supplement to the LTSE Listings Issuer's Annual Report (an ``Annual Report Supplement''). The Annual Report Supplement must be distributed to shareholders along with, and in the same manner as, the LTSE Listings Issuer's Annual Report. In addition, an LTSE Listings Issuer would [[Page 14082]] be required to make the Annual Report Supplement available on or through its website and include a statement in its Annual Report that the LTSP Disclosures are available in the Annual Report Supplement and provide the website address. These requirements are designed to facilitate transparency and ensure that shareholders are aware of and able to access an LTSE Listings Issuer's LTSP Disclosures. LTSE Listings Issuers would also be required to notify IEX Regulation \53\ once its Annual Report Supplement has been made publicly available on its website. This requirement is designed to help the Exchange monitor for compliance with the LTSP Disclosure requirements. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \53\ IEX Regulation is the department of the Exchange or designated employees of the Exchange that supervise, administer, or perform the regulatory functions of the Exchange, including the administration of any regulatory services agreements with another self-regulatory organization to which the Exchange is a party. See IEX Rule 1.160(q). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (vi) Review by LTSP Committee Pursuant to proposed Rule 14A.207(b), the LTSP Disclosures would be required to be reviewed and approved by the LTSP Committee on at least an annual basis. Based on its review, the LTSP Committee must determine whether to recommend to the board of directors that the LTSP Disclosures be included in the Annual Report Supplement.\54\ Any board and committee approvals should be reflected in board resolutions as appropriate. This requirement is intended to increase alignment between board members and company managers on the company's long-term focus and helps to ensure that adequate board focus is placed on long-term strategy. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \54\ This proposed requirement is modeled after the audit committee paradigm in Regulation S-K, which requires the audit committee to state whether it recommends to the board of directors that the audited financial statements be included in the annual report on Form 10-K. See 17 CFR 229.407(d)(3)(i)(D). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (vii) Disclosures Upon Initial Listing As described above, an LTSE Listings Issuer would be required to include its LTSP Disclosures in its Annual Report Supplement. However, a newly public LTSE Listings Issuer may not provide its Annual Report Supplement to shareholders until months after its initial public offering. Therefore, to ensure that shareholders obtain information on a timely basis, the LTSE Listings Rules would include transitional disclosure provisions for newly listed issuers. Specifically, proposed Rule 14A.207(g)(1) would provide that, no later than at the time of its initial listing, an LTSE Listings Issuer must make the disclosure required by proposed Rule 14A.207(c)(1) (Disclosure of Long-Term Growth Strategy) publicly available on its website. Such disclosure must be made in compliance with applicable rules and regulations relating to the dissemination of free writing prospectuses. After its initial listing, an LTSE Listings Issuer would provide this disclosure in its Annual Report Supplement, as described above. Similarly, proposed Rule 14A.207(g)(2) would provide that, after initial listing, an LTSE Listings Issuer must make the disclosures required by proposed Rule 14A.207(d) (Disclosure Related to Buybacks), Rule 14A.207(e) (Disclosure Related to Human Capital Investment) and Rule 14A.207(f) (Disclosure Related to Research and Development) publicly available on its website by the earlier of when the company files its next Form 10-K or Annual Report Supplement.\55\ After its initial listing, an LTSE Listings Issuer would provide this disclosure in its Annual Report Supplement, as described above. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \55\ The disclosures are required to be made the ``earlier of'' when a company files a Form 10-K or Annual Report Supplement to account for the fact that, for an IPO company, a 10-K filing may significantly precede the first annual meeting. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (C) Long-Term Alignment of Executive Compensation The Exchange believes that long-term focused companies seek to align the compensation of their Executive Officers \56\ with the long- term performance of the company, while excessively short-term compensation instruments could promote incentives that are not aligned with long-term performance. Proposed Rule 14A.405(b)(3) would therefore require that an LTSE Listings Issuer's compensation committee adopt a set of executive compensation guidelines applicable to Executive Officers that are designed to link executive compensation to the long- term value of the LTSE Listings Issuer. The compensation committee would be required to include in the executive compensation guidelines general principles for determining the form and amount of Executive Officer compensation (and for reviewing those principles, as appropriate). In addition, the executive compensation guidelines would be required to be consistent with certain minimum standards described below. These requirements are intended to ensure that LTSE Listings Issuers design their executive compensation plans in accordance with specified long-term parameters, but also provide sufficient flexibility to allow such issuers to remain competitive in crafting individual compensation packages. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \56\ IEX Rule 14.405(a)(1) defines ``Executive Officer'' for these purposes as persons meeting the definition of ``officer'' under Rule 16a-1(f) under the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (i) Consistency With Long-Term Growth Strategy Proposed Rule 14A.405(b)(3)(A) would require that the compensation committee ensure that the time periods and performance metrics used to determine Incentive-Based Compensation \57\ for Executive Officers are consistent with an LTSE Listings Issuer's Long-Term Growth Strategy. Since the members of the LTSP Committee would be the directors with the greatest involvement in the LTSE Listings Issuer's Long-Term Growth Strategy, the compensation committee may consult with the LTSP Committee in assessing whether such time periods and performance metrics are consistent with the LTSE Listings Issuer's Long-Term Growth Strategy. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \57\ Pursuant to proposed Rule 14A.002(a)(8), Incentive-Based Compensation would be defined as ``any variable compensation, fees, or benefits that serve as an incentive or reward for performance.'' --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In addition, an LTSE Listings Issuer would be required to disclose in its proxy statement or, if no proxy statement is filed, its Annual Report Supplement, whether or not the compensation committee has determined that the time periods and performance metrics used to determine Incentive-Based Compensation for Executive Officers are consistent with LTSE Listings Issuer's Long-Term Growth Strategy. (ii) Long-Term Compensation and Vesting Periods Proposed Rule 14A.405(b)(3)(B)(i) would prohibit an LTSE Listings Issuer from providing Executive Officers with any Incentive-Based Compensation that is tied to a financial or performance metric that is measured over a time period of less than one year, or grant any time- based equity compensation that has any portion that vests in less than a year from the grant date (or from the hire date, in the case of new hire grants). By requiring Incentive-Based Compensation and time-based equity compensation to be tied to time periods of at least one year, the LTSE Listings Rules are designed to require that LTSE Listings Issuers avoid creating potential incentives to manage for short-term results, encouraging management to focus on longer-term time horizons. Proposed Rule 14A.405(b)(3)(B)(ii) would require that equity compensation awarded to Executive Officers vest over a period (the ``Vesting Period'') of at [[Page 14083]] least five years. This minimum five-year Vesting Period is intended to ensure that executive compensation is tied to long-term company performance. In addition, while LTSE Listings Issuers would have flexibility in determining the specific vesting schedule within the Vesting Period (i.e., the percentage of total equity compensation vested per year), the vesting schedule would be required to reflect the long-term focus of the equity grant. For example, a ten-year vesting schedule that vested 90% of the total equity compensation in the first year would not be consistent with a long-term focus. The Exchange understands, however, that there may be certain situations in which accelerated vesting would be appropriate and would not undermine the underlying purpose of this provision. As a result, proposed Rule 14A.405(b)(3)(B)(ii) would allow for accelerated vesting upon the death of an Executive Officer or the occurrence of a disability that renders an Executive Officer permanently unable to remain employed at the LTSE Listings Issuer in any capacity. Whether to adopt exceptions of this type would be left to the discretion of the LTSE Listings Issuer and would be required to be outlined in the agreement providing the equity grant. While the LTSE Listings Rules seek to maintain a long-term focus in compensation, there may be exceptional circumstances in which the payment of shorter-term Incentive-Based Compensation or shorter-term Vesting Periods are consistent with this focus and may be required for specific business purposes. Therefore, proposed Rule 14A.405(b)(3)(B)(iii) would provide that the compensation committee may provide alternative time periods for incentive and equity compensation if there is a business necessity and the LTSE Listings Issuer discloses and explains such business necessity in the LTSE Listings Issuer's proxy statement, or if the LTSE Listings Issuer does not file a proxy statement, in the LTSE Listings Issuer's Annual Report Supplement. To ensure that this exception remains limited, the rule would also prohibit the amount of equity awards granted in the aggregate that vests before the first anniversary of the grant date, or that does not meet the minimum five-year vesting schedule, from exceeding 5% of the total number of shares authorized for grant in any fiscal year. Proposed Rule 14A.405(b)(3)(B)(iv) would provide that the compensation committee must determine appropriate Vesting Periods and amounts, as well as holding periods, for equity compensation awarded to Executive Officers that apply following an Executive Officer's retirement or resignation. Such Vesting Periods and amounts would also be required to be consistent with the requirements set forth in proposed Rule 14A.405(b)(3)(B)(ii) described above. The compensation provisions of the LTSE Listings Rules are premised on the idea that Executive Officers having financial interests in the long-term performance of the company--even after their departure from the company--will have a greater incentive to conduct business with long- term performance in mind and to undertake efforts for effective succession and departure planning. The Exchange understands that business needs and market practice may vary for different companies in different industries and sectors. Therefore, the specific schedule for vesting and holding is left for determination by the individual LTSE Listings Issuer, but each LTSE Listings Issuer is required to provide such a schedule to promote these underlying purposes. (iii) Exemption for Existing Agreements Prior to Listing The Exchange appreciates that an issuer may have entered into compensation arrangements prior to deciding whether to list on LTSE Listings and recognizes that it may impose an undue burden on such companies if they were required to unwind executive compensation plans that have been in effect for an extended period of time in order to list on LTSE Listings. Therefore, proposed Rule 14A.405(b)(3)(C) would provide an exemption from the executive compensation requirements contained in the LTSE Listings Rules for any executive compensation that is subject to an existing written agreement entered into at least one year prior to the initial listing of an LTSE Listings Issuer on the Exchange. The proposed exemption for preexisting compensation arrangements contains a one-year look-back period that is designed to assure that the exempted compensation arrangements were bona fide preexisting arrangements, and not entered into shortly before applying for listing on LTSE Listings in order to avoid the restrictions contained in the LTSE Listings Rules. In addition, the use of this exemption must be disclosed in the Annual Report Supplement. (iv) Smaller Reporting Companies IEX Rule 14.405(d)(5) exempts ``Smaller Reporting Companies,'' as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Act,\58\ from certain compensation committee requirements. Notwithstanding these exemptions that otherwise apply to companies listed on the Exchange, proposed Rule 14A.405(b)(4) would provide that an LTSE Listings Issuer that is a Smaller Reporting Company must adopt the executive compensation guidelines described above. In addition, such an issuer would be required to certify that it has adopted a formal written compensation committee charter or board resolution that specifies the additional compensation committee charter requirements for LTSE Listings Issuers--that the compensation committee must report regularly to the board of directors and adopt executive compensation guidelines in accordance with proposed Rule 14A.405(b)(2). The Exchange believes that, notwithstanding that Smaller Reporting Companies may have less resources than other issuers, these compensation committee requirements are an important feature of the LTSE Listings Rules and are a key part of the differentiated choice provided by the LTSE Listings category that long-term focused investors find important, and that accordingly, Smaller Reporting Companies electing to list on LTSE Listings should be required to comply with such compensation committee requirements. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \58\ See 17 CFR 240.12b-2. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (D) Long-Term Shareholder Voting Structure Consistent with the focus of the LTSE Listings category to provide a differentiated choice for issuers and investors that prefer listing standards explicitly designed to promote long-term value creation, proposed Rule 14A.413(b) would require that LTSE Listings Issuers maintain certain voting rights provisions in their corporate organizational documents that provide all shareholders with the ability, at the shareholders' option, to accrue additional voting power over time. As described more fully below, these provisions are designed to align with the long-term focus of the LTSE Listings category by providing long-term investors in an LTSE Listings Issuer with a greater role in corporate governance than short-term shareholders. The Exchange believes that long-term investors in a public company are more likely than short-term shareholders to exercise their voting rights in a manner that prioritizes long-term growth over short-term results. Specifically, as of the date of the company's initial listing on LTSE [[Page 14084]] Listings, each holder of equity securities listed on LTSE Listings must be entitled to an equal number of votes per share (the ``Initial Voting Power'') on a per class basis.\59\ For each full calendar month in which a shareholder maintains continuous record ownership of shares, the voting power of such shares for so long as they are held of record by such shareholder would increase by at least one twelfth (1/12th) over the shares' Initial Voting Power on the last business day of the month, up to an amount that is ten times their Initial Voting Power.\60\ If, at any time, a shareholder transfers its shares out of record ownership (whether for purposes of sale or otherwise), then on the date of such transfer, such shares will revert to entitling the shareholder to the Initial Voting Power of such shares. Because each holder of a class of equity securities listed on LTSE Listings would have an equal number of votes per share on the date of initial listing, each investor would have an equal opportunity to obtain increased voting rights over time and no shareholders would receive a preference over others. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \59\ The Exchange notes that all shares listed on LTSE Listings must have a minimum level of Initial Voting Power and conform to the voting rights set forth in proposed Rule 14A.413. However, proposed Supplementary Material .01(a) to proposed Rule 14A.413 clarifies that proposed Rule 14A.413(b) would not prevent an LTSE Listings Issuer, so long as not inconsistent with IEX Rule 14.413, from (i) maintaining multiple classes of securities, including shares that have voting power per share in excess of the Initial Voting Power of the securities listed on the Exchange, and/or (ii) establishing or maintaining classes of shares not listed on the Exchange that do not meet the requirements of proposed Rule 14A.413(b). \60\ Pursuant to proposed Supplementary Material .01(b) to proposed Rule 14A.413, an LTSE Listings Issuer would be permitted to provide that the voting rights of shareholders holding of record increase at a rate greater than one twelfth (1/12th) per month, provided that the voting power of such shares may not increase to a level that exceeds ten times their Initial Voting Power. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (i) Mechanism for Tracking Holding Periods The Exchange notes that tracking the ultimate beneficial ownership and length of continued ownership may be difficult or impossible for shares held through the common ``street name'' ownership system. Shares held in street name are registered on the books of an issuer's transfer agent in the name of a nominee selected by the Depository Trust Company's (``DTC''), with DTC maintaining records of the number of shares held for its various brokerage firm participants, and those brokerage firms each maintaining records of the number of shares held for its particular customers.\61\ As a result, an issuer reviewing its own books and records maintained by its transfer agent may be unable to definitively determine who its ultimate ``street name'' shareholders are, or for how long they have held their shares. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \61\ See generally Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76743 (December 22, 2015), 80 FR 81947 (December 31, 2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In order to track ownership for purposes of those shareholders opting to accrue additional voting power, the LTSE Listings Rules require that LTSE Listings Issuers look to whether a beneficial owner is also the holder of the shares in the LTSE Listings Issuer's records, i.e., as a holder of record. A shareholder that purchases its shares through a brokerage firm may initially receive shares held on its behalf in street name through the brokerage firm. However, through a Direct Registration Program (``DRP''),\62\ a shareholder maintaining its shares in street name may request that its shares (or some portion of its shares) be transferred to instead be held in record ownership on the books of the issuer's transfer agent, or transferred back to its brokerage account.\63\ For these purposes, a shareholder will be deemed to have record ownership as of the date the shareholder appears as the record owner on the books of the LTSE Listings Issuer directly, or through a third-party transfer agent. In addition, for these purposes, record owners of shares listed on LTSE Listings would include those holding a physical paper certificate of such shares and those holding such shares through a DRP. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \62\ The Exchange's rules already require that any issuer listed on the Exchange, including on the LTSE Listings, be eligible for a DRP. See IEX Rule 14.208. Because the ability to transfer shares to and from record ownership through a DRP is critical to tracking of long-term shareholders' voting rights for LTSE Listings Issuers, the exception contained in Rule 14.208(c) that allows certain foreign issuers to list securities on the Exchange that are not eligible for a DRP would not be available to LTSE Listings Issuers. See proposed Rule 14A.208. \63\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76743 (December 22, 2015), 80 FR 81947 (December 31, 2015) at text accompanying n.92-93. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Although requiring that shares be held in record ownership in order to accrue additional voting rights may raise administrative burdens on shareholders, the Exchange believes the ability for LTSE Listings Issuers to verify and track the ownership of these shareholders for purposes of calculating voting rights outweighs these burdens. In addition, because only those shareholders that expect to hold their shares for the long-term would opt to do so, the Exchange does not believe that electronically transferring the shares through a DRP would present a significant burden. Calculating voting rights in accordance with the provisions of proposed Rule 14A.413(b) will be novel to LTSE Listings Issuers and their shareholders and may present challenges. However, the Exchange understands that several transfer agents have indicated to LTSE that they are able to develop software or systems to assist LTSE Listings Issuers with tracking their shareholder voting rights as calculated in accordance with proposed Rule 14A.413(b). In order to ensure that LTSE Listings Issuers have such tools available to them and facilitate accurate calculation of their shareholders' voting rights, proposed Rule 14A.413(b)(5) would require that, prior to listing securities on LTSE Listings, a prospective LTSE Listings Issuer must obtain from its transfer agent a certification confirming that the transfer agent has software or other systems or processes available to the LTSE Listings Issuer that will enable the transfer agent and the LTSE Listings Issuer to determine, as of a particular record date, the LTSE Listings Issuer's shareholders' voting rights calculated in accordance with LTSE Listings Rule 14A.413(b). (ii) Shareholders Holdings Through Custodians As noted above, in order to track ownership for purposes of those shareholders opting to accrue additional voting power, the LTSE Listings Rules require that LTSE Listings Issuers look to whether a beneficial owner is also the holder of the shares in the LTSE Listings Issuer's records, i.e., as a holder of record. The Exchange understands, however, that for various reasons, including regulatory requirements applicable to registered investment advisers and registered investment companies,\64\ there may be shareholders that maintain ownership of securities through a third-party custodian, rather than in their own name. To accommodate such investors, proposed Supplementary Material .01(e) to proposed Rule 14A.413 would permit an LTSE Listings Issuer to recognize a shareholder as a holder of record solely for purposes of proposed Rule 14A.413(b), therefore entitled to increase its voting power over time, so long as the custodian for such shareholder becomes the shareholder of record and maintains its record [[Page 14085]] ownership in a manner that indicates the name of the ultimate beneficial owner. By way of example, if Investment Fund ABC maintains custody of its assets through Bank XYZ, an LTSE Listings Issuer may recognize Investment Fund ABC as the record holder of the shares of an LTSE Listings Issuer solely for purposes of this rule if Bank XYZ registers the shares on the books of the LTSE-Listed Issuer as being owned by ``Bank XYZ, as custodian for Investment Fund ABC.'' The Exchange believes that maintaining record ownership in this manner would allow an LTSE Listings Issuer to track that [sic] the period of time during which the shares have been held by the underlying investor, even if held through the custodian, while meeting the needs of those shareholders that wish to maintain custody of their assets through a separate custodian. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \64\ See, e.g., 17 CFR 275.206(4)-2 (with respect to registered investment advisers) and 15 U.S.C. 80a-17(f) and 17 CFR 270.17f-1-f- 7 (with respect to registered investment companies). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (iii) Technical Changes in Record Ownership Because of the mechanics of tracking long-term ownership, the term of ownership for purposes of LTSE Listings Issuers calculating a shareholder's increased voting rights is tied not to the actual date of a shareholder's acquisition or disposition of beneficial ownership, but the date the shares are transferred into or out of record ownership, i.e., the date that the name of the owner on the LTSE Listings Issuer's books is changed. The Exchange acknowledges that this may result in situations where technical changes to ownership structure could cause a shareholder to lose any accrued long-term voting. As a general matter, the Exchange believes that a bright-line rule that can be clearly and consistently applied is preferable to the need to analyze the surrounding circumstances regarding particular changes to record ownership. Nonetheless, the Exchange recognizes that particular LTSE Listings Issuers may wish to allow a shareholder to maintain any accrued long-term voting that would otherwise be lost as a result of technical changes. As a result, proposed Supplementary Material .01(d) to proposed Rule 14A.413 would permit (but not require) an LTSE Listings Issuer to adopt a process by which a shareholder may demonstrate that, notwithstanding a technical change in record ownership, a change in beneficial ownership for purposes of this rule has not occurred. LTSE Listings Issuers choosing to do so may develop their own list of changes for which such waivers may be granted, so long as they are of a purely technical nature that clearly did not involve a change of beneficial ownership (such as re-titling ownership of shares due to a name change or a change from sole ownership to joint ownership with a spouse) rather than an actual change of the person holding voting and investment discretion. (iv) Potential Evasion of Loss of Long-Term Voting Upon Sale The ability to accrue long-term voting is intended to incentivize those beneficial owners with voting and investment discretion over an LTSE Listings Issuer's shares to become long-term shareholders, provide a mechanism by which such long-term shareholders can evidence their long-term ownership (i.e., by becoming record holders), and increase the relative role of such long-term shareholders in the governance of an LTSE Listings Issuer. There may be situations where it becomes apparent to an LTSE Listings Issuer that, notwithstanding the record holder of its shares remaining the same, the beneficial ownership has changed, in an effort to evade the purposes of long-term voting. For example, the Exchange recognized the risk that a person may create a special-purpose entity (an ``SPE'') to hold shares of an LTSE Listings Issuer and register the SPE as the owner of the shares on the books of the LTSE Listings Issuer. Over time, the shares held by the SPE would accrue additional voting rights. Ordinarily, once those shares are transferred, they would lose any accrued long-term voting and revert to their Initial Voting Power. However, if the person were to instead transfer the ownership of the SPE to a third party, that transfer may not result in a change of ownership of the underlying shares of the LTSE Listings Issuer on the books and records of the LTSE Listings Issuer's transfer agent. To address this situation, proposed Supplementary Material .01(c) to proposed Rule 14A.413 would permit (but not require) an LTSE Listings Issuer to include provisions in its governance documents such that if its board of directors adopted a resolution reasonably determining that, notwithstanding technical compliance with the provisions of an LTSE Listings Issuer's governance documents relating to the increasing voting power of long-term shareholders and continuity of record ownership, there has in fact been a change in beneficial ownership with respect to shares held of record that would evade the purposes of LTSE Listings Rule 14A.413(b), such shares may be treated as being entitled only to their Initial Voting Power. Any LTSE Listings Issuer that provides for such a process in its governance documents must also provide a process through which a shareholder directly affected by such a determination may challenge it. The Exchange believes that, together, this should protect LTSE Listings Issuers from an attempt by shareholders to improperly sell increased voting rights to new shareholders, while affording affected shareholders with an opportunity to present additional information demonstrating that a change of beneficial ownership has not occurred. (v) Consistency With the Exchange's Voting Rights Policy The Exchange believes that LTSE Listings Rule 14A.413(b) is fully consistent with IEX Rule 14.413 (the Exchange's ``Voting Rights Policy''). The Voting Rights Policy provides that the voting rights of existing shareholders of publicly traded common stock registered under Section 12 of the Act may not be disparately reduced or restricted through any corporate action or issuance. The Voting Rights Policy provides examples of corporate actions or issuances that could violate this policy, including the adoption of time-phased voting plans, which could encompass structures whereby investors gain additional voting rights over time.\65\ While the requirements of LTSE Listing Rule 14A.413(b) could be viewed as similar to time-phased voting plans, the Exchange does not believe that complying with LTSE Listing Rule 14A.413(b) would be inconsistent with the Voting Rights Policy, which bars a company already listed on the Exchange from undertaking the prohibited corporate actions. Because LTSE Listings Issuers would be required, as a pre-condition to listing on LTSE Listings, to already have in place a voting rights structure as of its date of its initial listing that complies with LTSE Listings Rule 14A.413(b), no new corporate action that disparately reduces voting rights would be taken [[Page 14086]] subsequent to listing on the Exchange. In addition, pursuant to LTSE Listings Rule 14A.413(b), all shareholders of the same class of LTSE Listings Issuer's common stock listed on LTSE Listings will have the same voting rights in that any shareholder is eligible to accrue additional voting rights. To the extent that the effect of LTSE Listings Rule 14A.413(b) is that those shareholders that elect not to accrue additional voting power have their relative voting rights reduced relative to those that elect to accrue additional voting power, this impact is the result of a corporate action taken prior to listing on LTSE Listings, known to investors prior to their determining to purchase shares of an LTSE Listings Issuer, and the actions or inactions of shareholders subsequent to listing. Thus, the Exchange believes that compliance with LTSE Listings Rule 14A.413(b) will not cause existing shareholders' voting rights to be disparately reduced or restricted through any corporate action or issuance within the meaning of IEX Rule 14.413. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \65\ Another example of such a corporate action enumerated in the Voting Rights Policy is the issuance of a new class of super- voting stock. Proposed Supplementary Material .01(f) to proposed Rule 14A.413 would provide that for purposes of LTSE Listings, a class of securities shall be considered super-voting stock if (i) the Initial Voting Power of such class of securities exceeds the Initial Voting Power of any of the LTSE Listings Issuer's existing classes of common stock listed on LTSE Listings or (ii) the rate at which the voting power of such class may increase over time is greater than the corresponding rate for any of the LTSE Listings Issuer's existing classes of common stock listed on LTSE Listings. An LTSE Listings Issuer would not be prohibited by proposed Rule 14.413 from issuing additional shares of a class of stock that is listed on LTSE Listings or from issuing shares of a new class of stock that does not constitute super-voting stock as described above. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In addition to the fact that the voting rights structure required under LTSE Listings Rule 14A.413(b) must be in place prior to listing on the Exchange, Supplementary Material .01 to IEX Rule 14.413 provides that the Exchange's ``interpretations under the policy will be flexible, recognizing that both the capital markets and the circumstances and needs of the Exchange Companies change over time.'' Accordingly, the Exchange will interpret the policy flexibly with regard to its consistency with an LTSE Listings Issuer's voting structures designed to meet LTSE Listings Rule 14A.413(b). As the Commission recognized in approving the voting rights policies of other self-regulatory organizations that are substantively identical to IEX Rule 14.413, ``there may be valid business or economic reasons for corporations'' for companies to provide different voting rights to different shareholders, and that the voting rights policies ``provide issuers with a certain degree of flexibility in adopting corporate structures, so long as there is a reasonable business justification to so doing, and such transaction is not taken or proposed primarily with the intent to disenfranchise.'' \66\ The Exchange believes that providing long-term investors with an opportunity for a greater voice in corporate governance is a reasonable business justification for an issuer to adopt the long-term voting structure required by proposed LTSE Listings Rule 14A.413(b) and that, because every shareholder has the opportunity to elect to accrue additional voting power, the structure would not be implemented with a primary purpose or intent to disenfranchise particular shareholders. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \66\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 35121 (December 19, 1994), 59 FR 66570 (December 27, 1994) (approving rule changes adopting voting rights policies of the New York Stock Exchange, American Stock Exchange, and National Association of Securities Dealers). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (E) Other Long-Term Requirements The Exchange is proposing to include in the LTSE Listings Rules certain other rules also designed to encourage LTSE Listings Issuers to focus on long-term value creation. These proposed rules are described further below. (i) Earnings Guidance Proposed Rule 14A.420(a) would provide that LTSE Listings Issuers are generally prohibited from providing earnings guidance more frequently than annually. For these purposes, ``Earnings Guidance'' would be defined as any public disclosure made to shareholders containing a projection of the LTSE Listings Issuer's revenues, income (including income loss), or earnings (including earnings loss) per share.\67\ As noted above, LTSE's research indicates that pressure to meet quarterly earnings guidance can cause managers to sacrifice long- term growth for short-term performance.\68\ Proposed Rule 14A.420(a) is intended to help companies alleviate the pressures surrounding the quarterly earnings process with respect to guidance, with a goal to ultimately shift the focus of both companies and investors toward longer-term milestones. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \67\ See proposed Rule 14A.002(a)(6). \68\ See Graham, supra note 15; Yongtae Kim, Lixin (Nancy) Su, Xindong (Kevin) Zhu, Does the Cessation of Quarterly Earnings Guidance Reduce Investors' Short-Termism? (December 12, 2016), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2885624. See also Chairman Jay Clayton, Hearing before the Senate Banking Committee on the Nomination of Jay Clayton, of New York, to be a Member of the Securities and Exchange Commission (March 23, 2017), available at https://www.thefederalregister.org/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-115shrg24998/html/CHRG-115shrg24998.htm (``In my experience, certain companies view the operational and other pressures inherent in quarterly earnings as costly, including because they detract from long-term planning and strategic initiatives.''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notwithstanding the general prohibition on providing Earnings Guidance more frequently than annually, proposed Rule 14A.420(a) would permit an LTSE Listings Issuer to update previously issued Earnings Guidance at any time if it believes that such disclosure would be required (i) by IEX Rule 14.207(b)(1), which requires an issuer to promptly disclose to the public any material information that would reasonably be expected to affect the value of the issuer's securities or influence investors' decisions; (ii) by other applicable law (including any of the Commission reporting rules); or (iii) to make the previously issued Earnings Guidance not misleading. Proposed Rule 14A.420(b) would clarify that any Earnings Guidance provided by an LTSE Listings Issuer, including updates and supplementary disclosure related to Earnings Guidance, shall be considered material information for purposes of IEX Rule 14.207(b)(1). As a result, LTSE Listings Issuers would be required to comply with the disclosure and notification requirements set forth therein when disseminating such information. (ii) Long-Term Stakeholder Policies Proposed Rule 14A.425(a) would require that each LTSE Listings Issuer develop and publish a policy regarding the LTSE Listings Issuer's impact on the environment and community, and a policy explaining the LTSE Listings Issuer's approach to diversity. The Exchange believes that effective long-term planning is enhanced when companies consider their impact on various stakeholders and the sustainability of their business, and that long-term investors generally value such information. Each LTSE Listings Issuer may have different stakeholders and different views on these issues. The LTSE Listings Rules would not impose any requirements on the content of these policies. Rather, proposed Rule 14A.425(a) would only require that LTSE Listings Issuers adopt and publish a policy, providing LTSE Listings Issuers with flexibility in developing what they believe to be appropriate policies for their business, and providing investors with insight into an LTSE Listings Issuer's management of these issues. Proposed Rule 14A.425(b) would require that each LTSE Listings Issuer review the policies required by proposed Rule 14A.425(a) at least annually and make such policies available on or through its website. In addition, each LTSE Listings Issuer would be required to disclose in its annual proxy statement or, if it does not file an annual proxy statement, in its Annual Report Supplement, that these policies are available on or through its website and provide the website address. These requirements are intended to ensure that investors are aware of and have access to an LTSE Listings Issuer's stakeholder policies. Although these policies must be made publicly available, proposed [[Page 14087]] Supplementary Material .01 to proposed Rule 14A.425 would provide that the required stakeholder policies need not be stand-alone documents and may be included as part of other LTSE Listings Issuer policies or reports. (iii) Website Requirements Proposed Rule 14A.430 would require LTSE Listings Issuers to have and maintain a publicly accessible website. In addition, to the extent that an LTSE Listings Issuer would be required under any applicable provision of the LTSE Listings Rules to make documents available on or through its website, an LTSE Listings Issuer would be required to ensure that the website is accessible from the United States, the website clearly indicates in the English language the location of such documents on the website and that such documents are available in a printable version in the English language. The Exchange understands that many long-term focused investors expect to be able to access corporate governance and other information regarding companies in which they have invested through the company's website, and accordingly the Exchange believes that it is appropriate to explicitly impose this website requirement. For transparency purposes, various proposed LTSE Listings Rules, as discussed above, would require that materials be made available on an LTSE Listings Issuer's website.\69\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \69\ See proposed Rules 14A.207(a), 14A.207(f), 14A.405(a)(2), 14A.405(b)(1)(B), 14A.405(c)(2)(C), 14A.405(d)(2), 14A.405(d)(5)(B), 14A.407(a)(2)(B), 14A.409(b) and 14A.425(b). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Proposed Rule 14A.430 is intended to specify in further detail the manner in which LTSE Listings Issuers may satisfy these website posting requirements. The Exchange notes that the foregoing website requirements are substantially similar to the requirements imposed by the listing rules of another national securities exchange.\70\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \70\ See NYSE Listed Company Manual, Rule 307.00. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (iv) Certification Requirements Proposed Rule 14A.435 would require that LTSE Listings Issuers make certain certifications to the Exchange. Specifically, proposed Rule 14A.435(a) would require LTSE Listings Issuers certify [sic], at or before the time of listing, that all applicable listing criteria have been satisfied. This requirement is substantively identical to IEX Rule 14.202(b), which requires all issuers listed on the Exchange to submit such a certification. The Exchange proposes to repeat this requirement in the LTSE Listings Rules to clarify that the certification must include compliance with the LTSE Listings Rules, in addition to the Exchange's other listing rules. Proposed Rule 14A.435(b) would require that the CEO of each LTSE Listings Issuer certify annually to the Exchange that the LTSE Listings Issuer is in compliance with proposed Rule Series 14A.400, which contain the corporate governance requirements of the LTSE Listings Rules, qualifying the certification to the extent necessary. Various IEX listing rules impose certification requirements,\71\ and IEX Rule 14.207 requires that a listed company must provide the Exchange with prompt notification after an Executive Officer of the company becomes aware of any noncompliance by the company with the corporate governance requirements set forth in IEX Rule 14.400. However, given the unique nature of the LTSE Listings Rules, the Exchange believes that adding an annual certification requirement for LTSE Listings Issuers will assist the CEO and senior management of such issuers in overseeing and assuring compliance with LTSE Listings corporate governance requirements on an ongoing basis. In addition, the Exchange notes that another national securities exchange similarly requires that the CEO of a company listed on that exchange certify annually that he or she is not aware of any violation by the company of that exchange's corporate governance listing standards.\72\ Proposed Rule 14A.435(b) would also require each LTSE Listings Issuer CEO certify [sic] annually to the Exchange that the LTSE Listings Issuer has designated an employee responsible for ensuring that the voting power of the LTSE Listings Issuer's securities is determined in accordance with proposed Rule 14A.413(b) (Long-Term Voting). The Exchange believes that such an annual certification requirement would help ensure that LTSE Listings Issuers establish internal systems reasonably designed to assure compliance with LTSE Listing's long-term voting provisions. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \71\ See, e.g., IEX Rule 14.202(b) (requiring a company listing on the Exchange to certify, at or before the time of listing, that all applicable listing criteria have been satisfied); IEX Rule 14.405(c)(1) (requiring each company listed on the Exchange to certify that it has adopted a formal written audit committee charter and that the audit committee will review and reassess the adequacy of the formal written charter on an annual basis); IEX Rule 14.405(d)(1) (requiring each company listed on the Exchange to certify that it has adopted a formal written compensation committee charter and that the compensation committee will review and reassess the adequacy of the formal written charter on an annual basis). \72\ See NYSE Listed Company Manual, Rule 303A.12(a). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (v) Issuer Designation Requirements and Dually-Listed Securities The Exchange proposes to permit an LTSE Listings Issuer to list a class of securities that, in connection with its initial public offering, has been approved for listing on another national securities exchange (``Dually-Listed Securities''). The Exchange expects that this would foster competition among markets and further the development of the national market system. The Exchange would make an independent determination of whether such companies satisfy applicable listing standards and would require such companies to enter into a dual-listing agreement with the Exchange.\73\ In the event that a company chooses to dually-list on both LTSE Listings and another national securities exchange in connection with its IPO, the Exchange would expect such other national securities exchange to be the LTSE Listings Issuer's ``Primary Listing Market.'' \74\ The Exchange is proposing certain additional rules to facilitate dual-listings. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \73\ The Exchange would also monitor the dually-listed LTSE Listings Issuer for compliance with all applicable IEX Rules on an ongoing basis, as it would for any other LTSE Listings Issuer. \74\ Pursuant to proposed Rule 14A.002(a)(14), ``Primary Listing Market'' would have the same meaning as that term is defined in the Nasdaq Unlisted Trading Privileges national market system plan and consistent with use of the term ``listing market'' in the Consolidated Quotation Service and Consolidated Tape Association national market system plans. Where an LTSE Listings Issuer is dually-listed on another national securities exchange, the initial trading of such issuer's securities on the Exchange would not occur until after the completion of the opening auction for such securities on the first day of listing on the Primary Listing Market. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to proposed Rule 14A.210(b), an LTSE Listings Issuer that has Dually-Listed Securities would be required to notify the Exchange promptly if it receives oral or written notification from the other national securities exchange on which the LTSE Listings Issuer's Dually-Listed Securities are listed that such class of listed securities has fallen below the continued listing requirements of such other market. In addition, such an LTSE Listings Issuer would also be required to notify the other national securities exchange on which its Dually-Listed Securities are listed if it receives oral or written notification that such class of listed securities has fallen below the continued listing requirements of Chapter 14 of the IEX Rules or the LTSE Listings Rules contained in Chapter 14A of the IEX Rules. [[Page 14088]] Proposed Supplementary Material .01 to proposed Rule 14A.210 would clarify the application of certain IEX Rules, such as rules governing trading halts, for Dually-Listed Securities, given the fact that the Exchange would not be the Primary Listing Market. These proposed rules are designed to avoid creating potential confusion for investors and market participants with respect to Dually-Listed Securities. The Exchange notes that these provisions are substantially consistent with the rules of other national securities exchanges.\75\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \75\ See Nasdaq Stock Market Equity Rules 5220 and IM-5220; CBOE BZX Exchange, Inc. Rule 14.3(d) and Rule 14.3 Interpretation and Policy .01. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (F) Proposed Rules Clarifying Application of Existing Exchange Rules In addition to proposed rules that would encourage LTSE Listings Issuers to focus on long-term value creation, the Exchange is also proposing rules that would clarify the application of certain existing Exchange rules to LTSE Listings Issuers. These proposed rules are described further below. (i) Supplemental Nature of LTSE Listings Rules Proposed Rule 14A.001(a) would provide that the LTSE Listings Rules are supplemental listing standards applicable to LTSE Listings Issuers and that LTSE Listings Issuers must also fully qualify for listing under Chapter 14 of the Exchange's rules and the LTSE Listings Rules on an initial and ongoing basis. This provision is intended to clarify that LTSE Listings Issuers would be subject to the LTSE Listings Rules, as well as all other applicable listing rules of the Exchange, except as they may be specifically modified for LTSE Listings Issuers. Proposed Rule 14A.001(b) would provide that LTSE Listings Issuers may only list common equity securities on LTSE Listings. Although the Exchange maintains listing rules relevant for other types of securities, such as American Depositary Receipts, preferred stock, rights and warrants, among others, such securities would not be eligible for listing on LTSE Listings. The Exchange is proposing to establish an LTSE Listings category to provide a differentiated choice for issuers and investors that prefer listing standards explicitly designed to promote long-term value creation. At this time, the Exchange believes that, given that corporate governance and voting rights are more typically associated with common equity than other securities, it is most appropriate for a company electing to become subject to the LTSE Listings Rules to list its common equity on LTSE Listings. (ii) Change of Control and Reverse Mergers IEX Rule 14.102(a) provides that an Exchange-listed company must apply for initial listing in connection with a transaction whereby the Exchange-listed company combines with, or into, an entity that is not listed on the Exchange, resulting in a change of control of the company and potentially allowing such entity to obtain an Exchange listing. The rule enumerates certain factors that the Exchange will consider in determining whether a change of control has occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in management, board of directors, voting power, ownership and financial structure. Proposed Rule 14A.102(a)(1) would impose an analogous requirement on LTSE Listings Issuers combining with, or into, an entity that is not listed on LTSE Listings, including an entity that is a not an LTSE Listings Issuer that is otherwise listed on the Exchange. The Exchange would consider the same factors enumerated in IEX Rule 14.102(a) when determining whether a change of control has occurred for purposes of proposed Rule 14A.201(a)(1). Proposed Rule 14A.102(a)(1) would also require that any combined entity applying for initial listing as permitted by this rule must agree to comply with all applicable requirements of Chapter 14A, including requirements relating to long-term voting set forth in proposed Rule 14A.413. Proposed Rule 14A.102(a)(2) would clarify the impact of a change of control transaction on the proposed long-term voting provisions of LTSE Listings. Specifically, proposed Rule 14A.102(a)(2) would provide that if an initial listing following a change of control meets applicable listing requirements and the LTSE Listings Issuer is the surviving entity following the business combination, any shares of the LTSE Listings Issuer that have accrued additional voting power pursuant to proposed Rule 14A.413(b) prior to the business combination would retain such additional voting power following the business combination. On the other hand, if the non-LTSE Listings Issuer is the surviving entity or a new entity is formed following the business combination, all shares of the class or classes of securities to be listed on LTSE Listings will have voting power equal to their Initial Voting Power at the time of such listing. Any additional voting power accrued pursuant to Rule 14A.413(b) by the shareholders of the non-surviving LTSE Listings Issuer prior to the business combination would not be retained. IEX Rule 14.102(c) provides that a company that is formed by a Reverse Merger \76\ is eligible to submit an application for initial listing only if the combined entity has satisfied certain conditions. Proposed Rule 14A.102(b) would clarify that such an entity would not be eligible to apply for initial listing on LTSE Listings. The Exchange does not believe a reverse merger company would be able to satisfy the requirements of the LTSE Listings Rules. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \76\ A ``Reverse Merger'' is generally defined as ``any transaction whereby an operating company becomes an Exchange Act reporting company by combining, either directly or indirectly, with a shell company which is an Exchange Act reporting company, whether through a reverse merger, exchange offer, or otherwise.'' See IEX Rule 14.002(a)(27). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (iii) General Procedures and Prerequisites for Initial and Continued Listing on LTSE Listings Proposed Rule 14A.200 would establish general procedures and prerequisites for initial and continued listing on LTSE Listings. This rule series is intended to supplement and clarify the application of the general procedures and prerequisites set forth in the IEX Rule Series 14.200. IEX Rule 14.200(a) requires a company seeking the initial listing of one or more classes of securities on the Exchange to participate in a free confidential pre-application eligibility review by the Exchange in order to determine whether it meets the Exchange's listing criteria. If, upon completion of this review, the Exchange determines that a company is eligible for listing, the Exchange will provide the company with a clearance letter, notifying the company that it has been cleared to submit an original listing application. Proposed Rule 14A.200(a) would clarify that if a company is seeking a listing on LTSE Listings, prior to providing a clearance letter, the Exchange must determine that the company is eligible for listing under the LTSE Listings Rules, in addition to the Exchange's other listing criteria.\77\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \77\ As is the case with other companies applying for listing on the Exchange, if the Exchange determines that a company is ineligible for listing on LTSE Listings, the company may request a review of IEX's determination pursuant to the process set forth in IEX Rule 9.555. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IEX Rule 14.200(b) outlines the applications and qualifications process for companies that have received a clearance letter. A company seeking to list on LTSE Listings would be required to follow this process, including executing a listing agreement and listing [[Page 14089]] application, as required by IEX Rule 14.202(a). However, proposed Rule 14A.200(b) would clarify that a company seeking to list on LTSE Listings would execute a listing agreement and listing application on the forms designated by the Exchange for LTSE Listings Issuers. These forms and applications would be available from IEX Regulation. IEX Rule 14.200(c) provides prerequisites for applying to list on the Exchange. A company seeking to list on LTSE Listings would be required to satisfy these prerequisites, except as otherwise provided by proposed Rule 14A.200(c). For example, IEX Rule 14.203(c) provides that all securities initially listed on the Exchange, but for securities which are in any event book-entry only, must be eligible for a DRP, except that a foreign issuer is not subject to this requirement if it submits to the Exchange a written statement from an independent counsel in such company's home country certifying that a law or regulation in the home country prohibits compliance with this requirement. Because eligibility for a DRP is essential to the proper functioning of LTSE Listings' long-term shareholder voting provisions, proposed Rule 14A.200(c)(1) would provide that foreign issuers may not rely on the exception in IEX Rule 14.203(c) from the DRP eligibility requirement. IEX Rule 14.203(d) provides that a company applying to list on the Exchange must pay all applicable fees as described in Rule Series 14.600. Proposed Rule 14A.200(c)(3) would provide that in lieu of paying all applicable fees as described in IEX Rule Series 14.600, a company seeking the initial listing of one or more classes of securities on LTSE Listings would be required to pay all applicable fees as described in LTSE Listings Rule Series 14A.600. This provision is intended to clarify that companies seeking to list on LTSE Listings are not required to pay two separate listing fees. Proposed Rule 14A.200(c)(2) would provide that at the time that a company initially lists on LTSE Listings, the company may not already have any security listed for trading either on the Exchange (i.e., listed on IEX pursuant to IEX listing rules other than Chapter 14A) or on any other national securities exchange (unless dually listing on the other national securities exchange concurrently). The Exchange is initially limiting the availability of LTSE Listings to companies seeking to list on LTSE Listings concurrently with their initial public offering (whether listing on LTSE Listings only or dually-listing on LTSE Listings and another national securities exchange concurrently). The Exchange may in the future seek to expand the availability of LTSE Listings to other companies seeking to list on LTSE Listings that are otherwise already listed on a national securities exchange. (iv) Exemptions From Certain Corporate Governance Requirements IEX Rule 14.407 provides exemptions from the Exchange's corporate governance rules for certain types of companies, sets forth phase-in schedules for, among other things, initial public offerings and companies emerging from bankruptcy and describes the applicability of the corporate governance rules to Controlled Companies.\78\ Proposed Rule 14A.407 would clarify the application of these rules with respect to the LTSE Listings Rules, as described below. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \78\ The term ``Controlled Company'' is defined in Rule 14.407(c)(1) as an Exchange-listed company of which more than 50% of the voting power for the election of directors is held by an individual, a group or another company. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IEX Rule 14.407(a) provides exemptions to certain of the Exchange's corporate governance requirements for asset-backed issuers and other passive issuers, cooperatives, Foreign Private Issuers,\79\ limited partnerships and management investment companies. Proposed Rule 14A.407(a) would provide that an LTSE Listings Issuer may not rely on these exemptions with respect to the LTSE Listings Rules. The Exchange believes that exemptions for these entities is either (i) not necessary because LTSE Listings is only available for common equity or (ii) not appropriate given that LTSE Listings is designed to require particular minimum corporate governance. However, proposed Rule 14A.407(a) would clarify that a Foreign Private Issuer that is able to meet all applicable requirements of Chapter 14A, including the requirement to distribute an Annual Report Supplement, would be permitted to list on LTSE Listings. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \79\ Pursuant to IEX Rule 14.002(a)(15), the term ``Foreign Private Issuer'' as used in the Exchange's rules has the same meaning as under Exchange Act Rule 3b-4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IEX Rule 14.407(b) allows a company listed on the Exchange to phase-in its compliance with certain Exchange rules over a period of time in certain situations, including for initial public offerings, companies emerging from bankruptcy, transfers from other markets, and companies ceasing to be a Smaller Reporting Company. These phase-in schedules would apply to LTSE Listings Issuers in the same manner as they would apply to other companies listed on the Exchange. In addition to these phase-in schedules, proposed Rule 14A.407(b) would provide that an LTSE Listings Issuer that is listing in connection with its initial public offering or that is emerging from bankruptcy is permitted to phase-in its compliance with the requirement that the LTSP Committee be comprised of a majority of independent directors. Specifically, this rule would provide that at least one member of the LTSP Committee must be an independent director at the time of listing and a majority of the members of the LTSP Committee must be independent within 90 days of listing. This phase-in schedule is substantially similar to the corresponding phase-in schedules applicable to other board committees.\80\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \80\ See IEX Rule 14.407(b)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IEX Rule 14.407(c) outlines how the Exchange's listing rules apply to a Controlled Company. This rule provides that a Controlled Company is generally exempt from requirements to establish a compensation committee and requirements relating to independent director oversight of director nominations. These exemptions would apply to LTSE Listings Issuers in the same manner as they would apply to other companies listed on the Exchange. In addition to these exemptions, proposed Rule 14A.407(c)(1) would provide that a Controlled Company is exempt from the additional compensation committee and nominating/corporate governance committee requirements under proposed LTSE Listings Rules 14A.405(b) and 14A.405(d), except for the requirement to adopt executive compensation guidelines under proposed Rule 14A.405(b)(3). Proposed Rule 14A.407(c)(2) would provide that to the extent that a Controlled Company does not have a compensation committee, the independent directors on the LTSP Committee or the independent directors of the board of directors must be responsible for adopting the executive compensation guidelines. (v) Notification of Noncompliance IEX Rule 14.410 provides that a company listed on the Exchange must provide the Exchange with prompt notification after an Executive Officer of the company becomes aware of any noncompliance by the company with the requirements of Rule Series 14.400, which outlines the general corporate governance requirements for companies listed on the Exchange. Proposed Rule 14A.410 would supplement this requirement by requiring an LTSE Listings Issuer to provide the Exchange [[Page 14090]] with prompt notification after an Executive Officer of the LTSE Listings Issuer becomes aware of any noncompliance by the LTSE Listings Issuer with the requirements of LTSE Listings Rule Series 14A.400, which contains the supplemental corporate governance requirements for LTSE Listings Issuers. (vi) Shareholder Approval Calculation IEX Rule 14.412 sets forth the circumstances in which an Exchange- listed company is required to obtain shareholder approval prior to the issuance of securities in connection with the (1) the acquisition of the stock or assets of another company; (2) a change of control; (3) equity-based compensation of officers, directors, employees, or consultants; and (4) private placements. In some cases, such approval is required, among other potential triggers, if the common stock being issued ``has or will have upon issuance voting power equal to or in excess of 20% of the voting power outstanding before the issuance . . .'' (the ``Shareholder Approval Threshold'').\81\ The Exchange believes that the purpose of this aspect of the rule is to ensure that existing shareholders have a voice in transactions that would materially dilute the voting power of their shares. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \81\ IEX Rule 14.412(a)(1)(A). Shareholder approval may also be required if the number of shares of common stock to be issued is or will be equal to or in excess of 20% of the number of shares of common stock outstanding before the issuance of the stock or securities. See IEX Rule 14.412(a)(1)(B). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ordinarily, determining whether an issuance equals or exceeds the Shareholder Approval Threshold would be a simple calculation: The issuer would multiply the number of shares to be issued by the voting power of such shares and divide by the voting power of the shares outstanding before the issuance. If this number equals or exceeds the Shareholder Approval Threshold, shareholder approval would be required. However, shares listed on LTSE Listings (or that are of the same class of securities that are listed on LTSE Listings) may accrue voting power over time. As a result, even if the voting power of newly issued shares of an LTSE Listings Issuer is less than the Shareholder Approval Threshold at the time of the issuance, it may potentially be greater than the Shareholder Approval Threshold after a certain period of time, depending on how many of the new shares are registered in record name and accrue additional voting power over time, relative to the number of existing shareholders that do so. IEX Rule 14.412 requires that a company listed on the Exchange receive shareholder approval in advance of the ``potential issuance of common stock'' where the ``common stock has or will have upon issuance voting power'' that would exceed the Shareholder Approval Threshold. The Exchange notes that, by its terms, IEX Rule 14.412 therefore could be read to look only to the voting power of the shares upon issuance, rather than the potential voting power of those shares after some period of time.\82\ However, certain interpretations and supplementary material relating to other aspects of IEX Rule 14.412 do look to the potential for changes to the securities being issued, even past the initial issuance.\83\ As a result, in light of the potential increased future voting power of new shares to be issued, the Exchange believes that it is appropriate, in calculating the Shareholder Approval Threshold, to require that LTSE Listings Issuers assign a greater level of voting power to the newly issued shares than the Initial Voting Power of those shares, on the presumption that the ultimate voting power of those shares will increase over time. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \82\ See, e.g., IEX Rule 14.412(a)(1)(A). \83\ Specifically, for the purposes of determining the number of shares to be issued in an offering of future-priced securities, the Exchange staff will ``look to the maximum potential issuance of common shares.'' See Supplementary Material .04 to IEX Rule 14.412. Future-priced securities are securities that are convertible into common stock at a conversion price that is linked to the market price of the underlying common stock at the time of conversion. In such cases, the lower the price of the company's common stock at the time of conversion, the more shares of common stock the holder of the future-priced security would receive. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange notes, however, that because shareholders that obtain shares in a transaction may or may not elect to hold their shares in record ownership, and may hold them in such manner for varying lengths of time, it is not possible to determine with precision how many shares issued in any transaction would accumulate additional voting power or the extent of voting power those shares will eventually attain. One potential approach would be to assume that all of the new shares in a proposed issuance will be registered in record name and held in that form for ten years, thereby accruing the maximum additional voting power (i.e., ten times the Initial Voting Power).\84\ Under that approach, when conducting the shareholder approval calculation, the issuer would multiply the voting power of the shares to be issued (the numerator of this calculation) by ten and would then divide that number by the existing voting power of the shares outstanding (the denominator of this calculation). The Exchange believes that issuers would then be required to obtain shareholder approval frequently, because they would be required to assume a much higher voting power for the shares to be issued (to account for potential future voting power), but would also be required to assume that the voting power of the outstanding shares remains the same. The Exchange believes that this approach would not be appropriate because the Exchange believes that it would be extremely unlikely that all shares of a new issuance will be held in record name by the same shareholder uninterrupted for ten years.\85\ In addition, the Exchange believes that it would be even more unlikely for all shares of a new issuance to accrue votes up to the maximum amount while the shares outstanding remain static and do not accrue any additional votes. Given what the Exchange believes is the extremely low probability of this occurrence, the Exchange believes that requiring issuers to make these particular assumptions will result in LTSE Listings Issuers needing to obtain shareholder approval for transactions that would not be materially dilutive to existing shareholders nor would it be consistent with the objective of the rule, as it would effectively impose a Shareholder Approval Threshold of 2% instead of the 20% (if one were to calculate based solely on the Initial Voting Power of the shares at the time of their issuance). The Exchange does not believe that imposing the burden of obtaining shareholder approval (including the [[Page 14091]] monetary costs as well as time and uncertainty) would be justified for transactions that the Exchange believes are unlikely to be materially dilutive to the voting power of existing shareholders. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \84\ This approach would be similar to the approach required for calculating the number of shares that may be issued pursuant to an offering of future-priced securities, as discussed supra note 83. However, the Exchange believes that this approach would not be appropriate for determining whether the voting power of an issuance by an LTSE Listings Issuer would exceed the Shareholder Approval Threshold. In addition to the reasons described below, the Exchange believes purchasers of convertible securities have a strong economic incentive to exercise their conversion rights and acquire common stock at some point in time. If the price of the underlying common stock has declined at the time of conversion, the number of shares of common stock that will be issued (and thus the dilution of existing shareholders) could increase significantly. While the Exchange believes that LTSE Listings Issuers will attract more long- term focused shareholders, not all shareholders will be long-term or have the incentive, economic or otherwise, to register their shares in record name and accrue additional voting power, and the Exchange therefore believes that, for a variety of reasons, many shareholders will never elect to do so. \85\ As discussed above, supra note 11, the average holding period in 2015 was approximately eight months. Although the Exchange expects a longer average holding period for LTSE Listings Issuers, the Exchange believes that assuming a full ten-year holding period for all shareholders of LTSE Listings Issuers would not be reasonable. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Proposed Rule 14A.412 would take what the Exchange believes to be a more reasonable and balanced approach that is aligned with the purpose of this requirement, while still taking into account the potential increased future voting power of new shares to be issued.\86\ Specifically, for LTSE Listings Issuers that have been listed on LTSE Listings for at least five years, the numerator of the shareholder approval calculation would be determined by multiplying the number of shares to be issued by the product of the Initial Voting Power for such shares and a ``Long-Term Voting Factor,'' rather than just the Initial Voting Power of such shares. The Long-Term Voting Factor is intended to estimate the extent of the increase in voting power that the new shares to be issued are likely to obtain based on the percentage of increased voting power that existing issued shares have already obtained. This percentage would be applied to the new shares to be issued, thus estimating the likely voting power that the new shares would obtain over time. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \86\ The Exchange has included examples demonstrating how an LTSE Listings Issuer would conduct the shareholder approval calculations under proposed Rule 14A.412, as compared to alternative approaches considered, in Exhibit 3. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Long-Term Voting Factor would be calculated by dividing, as of the Shareholder Approval Calculation Date (defined below), the voting power outstanding attributable to the LTSE-Listings Issuer's shares listed on LTSE Listings by the combined Initial Voting Power of those shares. This number will be equal to one if none of the LTSE Listings Issuer's shareholders have accrued additional voting power and will increase beyond one at a rate proportional to the number of additional votes attributable to LTSE Listings' long-term voting mechanics. In other words, the Long-Term Voting Factor represents the effect of long- term voting on the LTSE Listings Issuer's outstanding voting power as of the Shareholder Approval Calculation Date. For example, if an LTSE Listings Issuer has 1,000,000 shares outstanding on the Shareholder Approval Calculation Date, each with an Initial Voting Power of one vote per share, and as a result of increases in voting power over time, those shares have a total of 3,000,000 votes, the Long-Term Voting Factor would be 3.0. The formula would then assume that new shares to be issued would similarly achieve three votes per share over some period of time in the future. Given that the Exchange is unable to predict how many shareholders will actually elect to hold their shares in record ownership and thereby accrue additional voting power, or how long such shareholders would hold their shares, the Exchange believes that it is reasonable to look to the LTSE Listings Issuer's prior experience and apply that same experience to the new shares to be issued. For LTSE Listings Issuers that have been listed on LTSE Listings for fewer than five years, the numerator in the shareholder approval calculation would be the greater of (i) the number of shares to be issued multiplied by the product of the Initial Voting Power for such shares and the Long-Term Voting Factor or (ii) the number of shares to be issued multiplied by the Initial Voting Power of such shares further multiplied by two. This effectively applies a minimum Long-Term Voting Factor of two to LTSE Listings Issuers that have been listed on LTSE for fewer than five years, even where the LTSE Listings Issuer has an actual Long-Term Voting Factor of less than two. The Exchange believes that imposing this minimum multiple of two is appropriate because the actual Long-Term Voting Factor that these companies would have experienced during their short period of time of being public companies is likely to be lower than longer-listed issuers and may not be representative of the longer-term growth in voting power that the new shares may ultimately attain.\87\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \87\ If the LTSE Listings category is approved, the Exchange will periodically assess whether a five year cut-off for applying a minimum Long-Term Voting Factor and the minimum Long-Term Voting Factor of two continue to be appropriate, or whether either should be modified based on its experience with LTSE Listings Issuers. For example, the Exchange will consider when the rate of growth of the voting power of an LTSE Listings Issuer's shares typically becomes relatively stable, and at what level. The Exchange notes that any such modification would be subject to the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) under the Act and Rule 19b-4 thereunder. See 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1) and 17 CFR 240.19b-4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- As stated above, it is difficult to predict with any level of certainty how many shareholders will register their shares in record name and accrue additional voting power; however, the Exchange believes that applying a minimum multiple of two for companies that have been listed on LTSE for less than five years is reasonable and conservatively estimates the relative potential voting power of the new shares to be issued. This belief is informed by the Exchange's understanding of current shareholder turnover data, such as that in 2015 (albeit for non-LTSE Listings Issuers), investors held a stock for an average of about eight months.\88\ A minimum Long-Term Voting Factor of two, however, the Exchange believes conservatively assumes a much longer average holding period. By way of example, an LTSE Listings Issuer would only have actually achieved a Long-Term Voting Factor of two, even after five years, if 20% of its outstanding shares were registered in the name of their shareholders on the books of the company in the first month following the issuer's IPO and such shares remained registered to those same investors without any interim transfers throughout the five-year period, and no other shares were added during that period.\89\ Both the factor of two and the five-year threshold are being imposed on the basis of the Exchange's best judgment, which the Exchange believes balances the need to recognize that the shares' voting power can increase with the burden faced by companies seeking shareholder approval. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \88\ See Turnover Ratio of Domestic Shares, supra note 11. \89\ If the LTSE Listings category is approved, the Exchange will periodically assess whether the minimum Long-Term Voting Factor of two for LTSE Listings Issuers listed for less than five years should be modified based on its experience with LTSE Listings Issuers. The Exchange notes that any such modification would be subject to the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) under the Act and Rule 19b-4 thereunder. See 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1) and 17 CFR 240.19b-4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Proposed Rule 14A.412(b) would also clarify how to calculate the denominator in the shareholder approval calculation. IEX Rule 14.412(e)(2) currently provides that the denominator (voting power outstanding) refers to the ``aggregate number of votes which may be cast by holders of those securities outstanding which entitle the holders thereof to vote generally on all matters submitted to the Company's security holders for a vote.'' The calculation would be the same for LTSE Listings Issuers, except that proposed Rule 14A.412(b) would provide that this calculation must be made as of the Shareholder Approval Calculation Date, which would be the date on which an LTSE Listings Issuer enters into a binding agreement to conduct a transaction that may require shareholder approval under IEX Rule 14.412 (i.e., the acquisition of stock of assets of another company or a private placement). The Exchange already expects Exchange-listed issuers to conduct this calculation as of this date; \90\ however, because the shares of [[Page 14092]] an LTSE Listings Issuer may accrue voting power over time, unlike the shares of other Exchange-listed companies, the Exchange believes it is important to explicitly specify in the LTSE Listings Rules the date on which this calculation must be performed. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \90\ The Exchange understands that other national securities exchanges similarly expect their listed issuers to conduct the shareholder approval calculation under those exchanges' substantially similar rules as of this date. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The provisions described above are designed to clarify how the shareholder approval calculation under IEX Rule 14.412 would be conducted by an LTSE Listings Issuer. All other provisions of IEX Rule 14.412 would continue to apply, including, for example, the financial viability exception in IEX Rule 14.412(f). (vii) Failure To Meet LTSE Listings Standards Pursuant to IEX Rule 14.500(a), securities of an Exchange-listed company that do not meet the listing standards set forth in Chapters 14 and 16 of the Exchange's rulebook are subject to potential delisting from the Exchange. IEX Rule Series 14.500 sets forth procedures for the independent review, suspension and delisting of companies that fail to satisfy such standards. Proposed Rule 14A.500(a) would provide that a failure to meet the listing standards set forth in the LTSE Listings Rules would be treated as a failure to meet the listing standards set forth in Chapter 14 of the Exchange's rulebook for purposes of IEX Rule Series 14.500. As a result, the procedures set forth in the IEX Rule Series 14.500 would apply to any LTSE Listings Issuer that fails to comply with the listing standards in the LTSE Listings Rules, in addition to other applicable listing standards in the Exchange's rulebook. IEX Rule 14.501(d) provides that if a company fails to satisfy the Exchange's listing standards, the type of deficiency at issue will determine whether the company will be immediately suspended or delisted, whether the company will have an opportunity to submit a plan to regain compliance or whether the company is entitled to an automatic cure or compliance period before a delisting determination is issued. Proposed Rule 14A.500(b) would provide that a failure to satisfy one or more of the LTSE Listings Rules will be treated as a deficiency for which a company may submit a plan to regain compliance in accordance with the Exchange's rules. Like all companies listed on the Exchange, LTSE Listings Issuers will be fully subject to IEX rules related to noncompliance and delisting, as set forth in Chapter 14 of the Exchange's rules. Proposed Rule 14A.500(c) would provide that in the event that an LTSE Listings Issuer becomes subject to delisting from LTSE Listings for failure to satisfy one or more LTSE Listings Rules but is otherwise in compliance with all other applicable listing rules of the Exchange, the Exchange may permit such issuer to remain listed on the Exchange, provided that such issuer will cease to be listed on LTSE Listings and will cease to be an LTSE Listings Issuer.\91\ In such cases, the Exchange would assess whether the issuer is in compliance with the Exchange's continued listing criteria (other than continued listing criteria applicable solely to LTSE Listings Issuers); however, the issuer would not need to resubmit a listing application to remain listed on the Exchange. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \91\ Regardless of whether or not the Exchange permits an LTSE Listings Issuer to remain listed on the Exchange in such circumstances, the Exchange would expect the issuer to comply with any disclosure obligations relating to the receipt of a notification of deficiency or delisting determination as set forth in IEX Rule 14.501(c) and Item 3.01 of Form 8-K with respect to the termination of its listing on LTSE Listings. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (viii) Listing Fees for LTSE Listings Issuers Proposed Rule Series 14A.600 is currently marked ``Reserved.'' The Exchange intends to file a separate proposed rule change with the Commission under Section 19 of the Act that would addresses [sic] listing fees applicable to LTSE Listings Issuers. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act in general,\92\ and further the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\93\ in particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \92\ 15 U.S.C. 78f. \93\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- As discussed in detail in the Purpose section above, the Exchange believes that there is growing concern among market observers that pressures to meet short-term expectations have resulted in negative consequences for companies, investors and the economy as a whole. The Exchange believes that the LTSE Listings Rules would remove impediments to a free and open market and protect investors and the public interest by providing the marketplace with a differentiated listing venue choice that seeks to encourage greater focus by companies and investors on the long-term. Specifically, the LTSE Listings Rules are intended to better enable companies to focus on long-term value creation, potentially enhancing opportunities for capital formation, and are also intended to foster transparency and effective corporate governance, which would benefit all investors, particularly those with a long-term focus. In addition, because listing on LTSE Listings and becoming subject to the LTSE Listings Rules is a voluntary election, the LTSE Listings Rules are not designed to permit unfair discrimination among issuers. The following subsections provide additional detail on how the LTSE Listings Rules are designed to further the objectives of Section 6(b) of the Act. (1) Board of Directors and Committee Requirements As described in the Purpose section under ``Board of Directors and Committee Requirements,'' the proposed LTSE Listings Rules would impose additional obligations on the boards of directors and board committees of LTSE Listings Issuers. For example, the LTSE Listings Rules would require each LTSE Listings Issuer to establish a board committee dedicated to overseeing the issuer's strategies for creating and sustaining long-term growth (i.e., an LTSP Committee). Among other things, the LTSP Committee would be required to review and approve an LTSE Listings Issuer's LTSP Disclosures, including the disclosure of its Long-Term Growth Strategy, on at least an annual basis. The Exchange believes that these requirements would protect investors and the public interest because it would help LTSE Listings Issuers focus on long-term goals. The LTSE Listings Rules would also require LTSE Listings Issuers to establish an independent committee dedicated to selecting or recommending qualified director nominees (i.e., a nominating/corporate governance committee). In addition, the LTSE Listings Rules would require the LTSP Committee, the nominating/ corporate governance committee, the compensation committee and the audit committee to report regularly to the board of directors and would require that the charters of such committees be made available on or through the LTSE Listings Issuer's website. The Exchange believes that these requirements are consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest [[Page 14093]] because they are designed to support the governance structure objectives of LTSE Listings. (2) Long-Term Strategy and Product Disclosures As described in the Purpose section under ``Long-Term Strategy and Product Disclosures,'' the proposed LTSE Listings Rules would require LTSE Listings Issuers to provide investors with LTSP Disclosures, which are supplemental disclosures regarding an LTSE Listings Issuer's long- term strategy and products. Specifically, the LTSP Disclosures would include disclosures relating to an LTSE Listings Issuer's Long-Term Growth Strategy, Buybacks, Human Capital Investment and research and development. These disclosures would be in addition to the disclosures required under the Act, the Commission's rules thereunder and the Exchange's other rules. The Exchange believes that the LTSP Disclosures would be consistent with the aims of the existing disclosure requirements of the Act--to ensure that investors receive full and accurate information so that they can make informed investment decisions--and are thereby consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. Specifically, the Exchange believes that the LTSP Disclosure requirements would ensure that investors receive sufficient information to evaluate a company's progress toward meeting long-term goals. Although only LTSE Listings Issuers would be subject to these requirements, these requirements would not unfairly discriminate among issuers as only those companies electing to be subject to the LTSE Listings Rules would be subject to these requirements. (3) Long-Term Alignment of Executive Compensation As described in the Purpose section under ``Long-Term Alignment of Executive Compensation,'' the LTSE Listings Rules would require that an LTSE Listings Issuer's compensation committee adopt a set of executive compensation guidelines applicable to Executive Officers that are designed to link executive compensation to the long-term value of the LTSE Listings Issuer. The Exchange believes that these requirements are consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, because they would help ensure that Executive Officers are incentivized to take actions that would enhance the long-term growth of an LTSE Listings Issuer, rather than short-term results. In addition, the Exchange believes that requiring a stronger link between a company's long-term performance and its executive compensation is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, by incentivizing executives to act in the long-term interest of LTSE Listings Issuers and limiting the extent to which executives could personally profit from efforts to effect short-term performance. (4) Long-Term Shareholder Voting Structure As described in the Purpose section under ``Long-Term Shareholder Voting Structure,'' the LTSE Listings Rules would require that LTSE Listings Issuers maintain voting rights provisions in their corporate organizational documents that provide shareholders with the ability, at the shareholders' option, to accrue additional voting power over time. The Exchange believes that these requirements are consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest because they would provide a mechanism by which long-term shareholders can have greater influence in corporate governance. The Exchange believes that long-term shareholders are more likely than short-term investors to exercise their governance rights in a manner that prioritizes long-term growth over short-term results, and thus it is in the public interest and furthers the protection of investors for longer-term investors to have a greater role in corporate governance. In this regard, the Commission has noted that, ``when the interests of long-term investors and short- term traders conflict . . . its clear responsibility is to uphold the interests of long-term investors.'' \94\ Further, the Exchange believes that, consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, the long-term voting rights provisions would not be unfairly discriminatory, as any shareholder of an LTSE Listings Issuer would have equal opportunity to elect to move their shares into registered form and accrue additional voting rights. Further, by requiring that the length of a shareholder's ownership be consistently measured through the shareholder's record ownership on an LTSE Listings Issuer's books, transferred to and from ``street name'' through a DRP, the Exchange believes that the system will foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, and processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in securities, consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \94\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37495, 37500 (June 29, 2005). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (5) Other Long-Term Requirements As described in the Purpose section under ``Other Long-Term Requirements,'' the LTSE Listings Rules would include certain other rules designed to encourage LTSE Listings Issuers to focus on long-term value creation. For example, the LTSE Listings Rules would provide that LTSE Listings Issuers are generally prohibited from providing Earnings Guidance more frequently than annually. The Exchange believes that this requirement is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest by enhancing the ability of companies to withstand short-term pressures and focus on long-term growth, and is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, such as the risk that a company could take actions to artificially meet prior Earnings Guidance. The LTSE Listings Rules would also require that each LTSE Listings Issuer develop and publish a policy regarding an LTSE Listings Issuer's impact on the environment and community, and a policy explaining an LTSE Listings Issuer's approach to diversity. The Exchange believes that this requirement is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest by ensuring that companies consider their impact on various stakeholders and the sustainability of their business. The LTSE Listings Rules would require LTSE Listings Issuers to have and maintain a publicly accessible website. Documents required to be posted on this website under the LTSE Listings Rules would be required to be made available in a printable version in the English language. The Exchange believes that these requirements are consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest by ensuring that investors and the public have access to the disclosures and other documents required by the LTSE Listings Rules. The LTSE Listings Rules would require LTSE Listings Issuers to make certain certifications to the Exchange. Specifically, LTSE Listings Issuers would be required to certify, at or before the time of listing, that all applicable listing criteria, including listing criteria under the LTSE Listings Rules, have been satisfied. In addition, the LTSE Listings Rules would require the CEO of each LTSE Listings Issuer to certify annually to the Exchange that the LTSE Listings Issuer is in compliance with proposed Rule Series 14A.400, which would contain the corporate governance [[Page 14094]] requirements of the LTSE Listings Rules, qualifying the certification to the extent necessary. The Exchange believes that these certification requirements are consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest and are designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices. As discussed in the Purpose section, given the unique nature of the LTSE Listings Rules, the Exchange believes that adding an annual certification requirement for LTSE Listings Issuers will assist the CEO and senior management of such issuers in ensuring compliance with LTSE Listings corporate governance requirements on an ongoing basis. (6) Proposed Rules Clarifying Application of Existing Exchange Rules As described in the Purpose section under ``Proposed Rules Clarifying Application of Existing Exchange Rules,'' the LTSE Listings Rules would include a number of rules that would clarify the application of existing Exchange rules to LTSE Listings Issuers. In general, these rules would provide that LTSE Listings Issuers must comply with both the LTSE Listings Rules as well as all other applicable rules of the Exchange. However, these rules would also explain any deviations from this general principle. For example, although the Exchange maintains listing rules relevant for various types of securities, including American Depositary Receipts, preferred stock, rights and warrants, among others, the LTSE Listings Rules would clarify that only common equity securities would be eligible for listing on LTSE Listings. Similarly, although the Exchange maintains a number of exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements for certain types of issuers (e.g., Foreign Private Issuers), certain exemptions would not be available for LTSE Listings Issuers. The Exchange believes that these rules are consistent with protecting investors and the public interest because they would provide transparency to issuers and investors on how the Exchange's existing rules would apply to an LTSE Listings Issuer. Although these rules discriminate between issuers listed on LTSE Listings and other issuers listed on the Exchange, as well as between the type of security listed, the Exchange believes that the rules are not unfairly discriminatory, as companies are free to elect whether to list on LTSE Listings and be subject to its additional requirements. Another example of a proposed rule that would clarify the application of existing Exchange rules to LTSE Listings Issuers is proposed Rule 14A.412, which would clarify how an LTSE Listings Issuer would conduct the shareholder approval calculation in IEX Rule 14.412. The Exchange believes that this proposed Rule would further the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act because it would ensure that the long-term voting mechanics of the LTSE Listings Rules are taken into account when conducting this calculation. As discussed in the Purpose section, the Exchange believes that the proposed approach appropriately balances the reasonably likely potential dilution to existing shareholders without imposing a disparately burdensome shareholder approval requirement on LTSE Listings Issuers. The fact that shares may accrue voting power over time means that shares may be issued that have voting power that is less than the Shareholder Approval Threshold at the time of issuance, but potentially greater than the Shareholder Approval Threshold after a certain period of time. This would increase the dilution to the shareholders that held shares prior to that issuance. Although such existing shareholders would also have the ability to accrue additional voting power, to protect such shareholders and promote just and equitable principles of trade, proposed Rule 14A.412 would require LTSE Listings Issuers to take into account the likely voting power growth that the potential new shares would obtain over time (i.e., the Long-Term Voting Factor) when determining whether an issuance covered by IEX Rule 14.412 would require shareholder approval. For purposes of proposed Rule 14A.412, the assumed growth in voting power for the potential new shares is equal to the actual growth in voting power that the existing shares have obtained; however, shares of relatively new LTSE Listings Issuers may not have had time to accrue additional voting power. In other words, the Long-Term Voting Factor may be lower than what it would otherwise be for an LTSE-Listings Issuer that has been listed on LTSE Listings for a longer period of time. As a result, proposed Rule 14A.412 provides that LTSE Listings Issuers that have been listed for fewer than five years must assume a minimum Long-Term Voting Factor of two.\95\ The Exchange believes that this provision further protects investors and helps ensure that the shareholder approval calculation in IEX Rule 14.412 appropriately balances the interests of existing shareholders in having a vote on potentially dilutive share issuances with the burden of holding a shareholder meeting under circumstances when material dilution is unlikely. The Exchange believes that this approach is consistent with the policy objectives of IEX Rule 14.412 as discussed in the Purpose section. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \95\ As noted in the Purpose section, if the LTSE Listings category is approved, the Exchange will periodically assess whether the minimum Long-Term Voting Factor of two should be modified based on its experience with LTSE Listings Issuers. The Exchange notes that any such modification would be subject to the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) under the Act and Rule 19b-4 thereunder. See 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1) and 17 CFR 240.19b-4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Proposed Rule 14A.500(c) would provide that in the event that an LTSE Listings Issuer becomes subject to delisting from LTSE Listings for failure to satisfy one or more LTSE Listings Rules but is otherwise in compliance with all other applicable listing rules of the Exchange, the Exchange may permit such issuer to remain listed on the Exchange, provided that such issuer will cease to be listed on LTSE Listings and will cease to be an LTSE Listings Issuer.\96\ The Exchange would assess whether such an issuer is in compliance with the Exchange's continued listing criteria (other than continued listing criteria applicable solely to LTSE Listings Issuers), and this provision would allow such an issuer to remain listed on the Exchange without going through the process of reapplying for an Exchange listing, which the Exchange believes would be disruptive to the issuer and its investors. As a result, the Exchange believes that this proposed rule would further the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act by, among other things, helping to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \96\ The Exchange believes that this provision is similar to rules of other national securities exchanges that permit an issuer receiving a delisting determination to transfer to a separate segment of such exchange, subject to compliance with the continued listing standards of the separate segment. See Nasdaq FAQ Identification No. 474 (7/31/2012). Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe that this aspect of the LTSE Listings Rules raises any new or novel issues and is consistent with requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. To the contrary, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change will enhance competition between exchange listing markets in furtherance of Section 11A(a)(1)(C)(ii) of the Act \97\ and consistent with Section 6(b)(8) of the [[Page 14095]] Act \98\ because it will provide issuers with an alternative with a differentiated offering as compared to the other listing rules existing on other national securities exchanges and the Exchange itself. Moreover, as a new listing venue, the Exchange expects to face intense competition from existing exchanges. Consequently, the degree to which a new listing category on the Exchange could impose any burden on intermarket competition is extremely limited, and the Exchange does not believe that such listing category would impose any burden on competing venues that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. In addition, there is no barrier to other exchanges adopting similar listing standards. To the extent LTSE Listings is successful in attracting issuers to the list on the Exchange, other exchanges or potential new entrants could respond by adopting their own rules that are designed to foster long-term value creation. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \97\ 15 U.S.C. 78k-1(a)(1)(C)(ii). \98\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange also does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in any burden on intramarket competition since becoming subject to the supplemental standards in the LTSE Listings Rules is completely voluntary. Issuers can elect to list on the Exchange without listing on LTSE Listings, or can elect to become subject to the heightened standards of the LTSE Listings Rules. The Commission and Congress have in other contexts recognized that companies may elect to be subject to greater compliance obligations than strictly required, or elect not to rely on exemptions that may otherwise be available. For example, in adopting the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act,\99\ Congress provided that emerging growth companies could, but were not required to, elect to rely on exemptions from various securities law requirements.\100\ Similarly, the Commission provides that classes of companies, such as Smaller Reporting Companies, may but are not required to provide particular disclosures.\101\ Similarly, other national securities exchanges have adopted categories for listed companies that elect to become subject to higher standards than other companies listed on such national securities exchange.\102\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \99\ Public Law 112-106, 126 Stat. 306 (2012). \100\ For example, emerging growth companies may, but ``need not present more than 2 years of audited financial statements in order for the registration statement of such emerging growth company with respect to an initial public offering of its common equity securities to be effective . . .'' See Securities Act Section 7(a)(2)(A); 15 U.S.C. 77g(a)(2)(A). \101\ See, e.g., Regulation S-K, Item 10(f); 17 CFR 229.10(f) (``[a] smaller reporting company may comply with either the requirements applicable to smaller reporting companies or the requirements applicable to other companies for each item, unless the requirements for smaller reporting companies specify that smaller reporting companies must comply with the smaller reporting company requirements''). \102\ See generally Nasdaq Rule 5000 series (containing more stringent listing standards for issuers listed on the ``Nasdaq Global Select Market'' as compared to those listed on the ``Nasdaq Global Market'' or the ``Nasdaq Capital Market''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange also does not believe that the proposal will impose any burden on competition between LTSE Listings Issuers that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act because all companies electing to list on LTSE Listings will be subject to the same standards. Furthermore, where appropriate, the LTSE Listings Rules are designed to provide LTSE Listings Issuers with flexibility to implement the minimum standards contained in the LTSE Listings Rules in ways that are best suited for that issuer's business. Finally, the Exchange does not believe that the transfer agent certification requirement under proposed Rule 14A.413(b)(5) will impose a burden on competition with respect to transfer agents. While not all transfer agents will be able to implement the required software or other systems or processes, any transfer agent can choose to invest the resources necessary to implement such software or other systems or processes. Moreover, as noted above, as a new listing venue, the Exchange expects to face intense competition from existing exchanges. Consequently, the degree to which a new listing category on the Exchange could impose any burden on competition among transfer agents is extremely limited, and the Exchange does not believe that such listing category would impose any burden on transfer agents that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others Written comments were neither solicited nor received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will: (A) By order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic CommentsUse the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or Send an email to [email protected]. Please include File Number SR-IEX-2018-06 on the subject line. Paper Comments Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-IEX-2018-06. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File [[Page 14096]] Number SR-IEX-2018-06 and should be submitted on or before April 23, 2018. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\103\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \103\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jill Peterson, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2018-06568 Filed 3-30-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![14074 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 63 / Monday, April 2, 2018 / Notices
Commission includes the estimated SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Sections A, B, and C below, of the most
burden of complying with the COMMISSION significant aspects of such statements.
information collection required by Rule A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
11a–2 in the total number of burden [Release No. 34–82948; File No. SR–IEX– Statement of the Purpose of, and
hours estimated for completing the 2018–06] Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
relevant registration statements and Change
reports the burden of Rule 11a–2 in the Self-Regulatory Organizations;
separate Paperwork Reduction Act Investors Exchange LLC; Notice of 1. Purpose
(‘‘PRA’’) submissions for those Filing of Proposed Rule Change To (1) Overview
registration statements (see the separate Establish a New Optional Listing
Category on the Exchange, ‘‘LTSE On June 17, 2016, the Commission
PRA submissions for Form N–3 (17 CFR
Listings on IEX’’ granted the Exchange’s application for
274.11b), Form N–4 (17 CFR 274.11c)
registration as a national securities
and Form N–6 (17 CFR 274.11d). The March 27, 2018. exchange under Section 6 of the Act,6
Commission is requesting a burden of Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the including approval of rules applicable
one hour for Rule 11a–2 for Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the to the qualification, listing and delisting
administrative purposes. ‘‘Act’’),2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3 of companies on the Exchange. The
The estimate of average burden hours notice is hereby given that, on March Exchange has since adopted additional
is made solely for the purposes of the 15, 2018, the Investors Exchange LLC rules to create a listing venue to provide
PRA, and is not derived from a (‘‘IEX’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the a new alternative for companies seeking
comprehensive or even a representative Securities and Exchange Commission to list their securities for trading on a
survey or study of the costs of (the ‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the registered national securities exchange.7
Commission rules or forms. With regard proposed rule change as described in The Exchange is proposing to adopt
Items I and II below, which Items have rules to facilitate the creation of a new
to Rule 11a–2, the Commission includes
been prepared by the self-regulatory optional listing category on the
the estimate of burden hours in the total
organization. The Commission is Exchange for common equity securities,
number of burden hours estimated for publishing this notice to solicit
completing the relevant registration referred to as the ‘‘LTSE Listings on
comments on the proposed rule change IEX’’ or ‘‘LTSE Listings.’’ The proposed
statements and reported on the separate from interested persons.
PRA submissions for those statements rules for LTSE Listings, to be contained
(see the separate PRA submissions for I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s in new Chapter 14A of the Exchange’s
Form N–3, Form N–4 and Form N–6). Statement of the Terms of Substance of rules (the ‘‘LTSE Listings Rules’’), were
the Proposed Rule Change initially developed by LTSE Holdings,
The information collection Inc. (together with its affiliates,
requirements imposed by Rule 11a–2 Pursuant to the provisions of Section
‘‘LTSE’’), and provide a differentiated
are mandatory. Responses to the 19(b)(1) under the Act of 1934,4 and
choice for issuers and investors that
collection of information will not be Rule 19b–4 thereunder,5 IEX is filing
prefer listing standards explicitly
kept confidential. An agency may not with the Commission a proposed rule
designed to promote long-term value
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not change to establish a new optional
creation. The Exchange understands
required to respond to, a collection of listing category on the Exchange, which
that LTSE anticipates separately
provides a differentiated choice for
information unless it displays a registering a subsidiary as a national
issuers and investors that prefer listing
currently valid control number. securities exchange in the future, but
standards explicitly designed to
The public may view the background has entered into an arrangement with
promote long-term value creation. The
documentation for this information the Exchange in order to make the LTSE
text of the proposed rule change is
collection at the following website, Listings Rules available to potential
available at the Exchange’s website at
interested companies in advance of its
www.reginfo.gov. Comments should be www.iextrading.com, at the principal
own subsidiary’s registration as a
directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the office of the Exchange, and at the
national securities exchange.
Securities and Exchange Commission, Commission’s Public Reference Room.
Becoming subject to the LTSE Listings
Office of Information and Regulatory II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Rules would be an optional election.
Affairs, Office of Management and Statement of the Purpose of, and the Companies listed on the Exchange that
Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule do not elect to be subject to the LTSE
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503, Change Listings Rules would not be required to
or by sending an email to: Shagufta_ comply with Chapter 14A. However,
Ahmed@omb.eop.gov; and (ii) Pamela In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included companies that list on LTSE Listings
Dyson, Director/Chief Information (‘‘LTSE Listings Issuers’’) would be
Officer, Securities and Exchange statements concerning the purpose of
and basis for the proposed rule change subject to the LTSE Listings Rules, as
Commission, c/o Remi Pavlik-Simon, well as the quantitative listing
and discussed any comments it received
100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 requirements set forth in IEX Rule
on the proposed rule change. The text
or send an email to: PRA_Mailbox@ of these statements may be examined at Series 14.300, and all other applicable
sec.gov. Comments must be submitted to the places specified in Item IV below. listing rules of the Exchange set forth in
OMB within 30 days of this notice. The self-regulatory organization has Chapter 14 of the IEX Rulebook, except
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Dated: March 27, 2018. prepared summaries, set forth in
6 15 U.S.C. 78f.
Eduardo A. Aleman, 7 See,
1 15 e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No.
Assistant Secretary. U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
80453 (April 13, 2017), 82 FR 18507 (April 19,
[FR Doc. 2018–06658 Filed 3–30–18; 8:45 am] 2017); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81316
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
(August 4, 2017), 82 FR 37474 (August 10, 2017);
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80905 (June
5 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 12, 2017), 82 FR 27748 (June 16, 2017).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:06 Mar 30, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00132 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02APN1.SGM 02APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_14137/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 63 / Monday, April 2, 2018 / Notices 14075
as they may be specifically modified for current and former members of the Share turnover data suggests that
LTSE Listings Issuers. Commission 9 have voiced concerns investors held stocks for an average of
At this time, the Exchange is limiting regarding so-called ‘‘short-termism’’ and about eight years in 1960, compared
the availability of LTSE Listings to the risk that some investors’ focus on with about eight months in 2015.11
companies seeking to list on LTSE short-term results could put pressure on While a great deal of this turnover may
Listings concurrently with their initial companies to sacrifice long-term value be attributable to the growth of high-
public offering (whether listing on LTSE creation in order to reach quarterly or frequency trading strategies (which
Listings only or dually listing on LTSE other short-term expectations. accounted for about 50% of all U.S.
Listings and another national securities Commenters have pointed to the trade volume in 2016),12 more
exchange). The Exchange would not dramatically declining average amount traditional institutional investors have
permit issuers already listed on another of time that an investor holds a stock as shown reduced holding periods as well.
national securities exchange to transfer evidence of a greater short-term focus.10 A 2013 survey showed that 96% of
to LTSE Listings. institutional investors executed round-
The Exchange believes that the new Bite? A Flesh-and-Blood Perspective on Hedge Fund trip trades that lasted less than one
LTSE Listings category will introduce a Activism and Our Strange Corporate Governance
System (April 2017), available at https://ssrn.com/ month, with 23% of their trading
differentiated choice for issuers and abstract=2921901 (‘‘Rather, human investors would volume relating to trades that are held
investors that prefer listing standards see great benefit from reforms encouraging the for less than three months.13
explicitly designed to promote long- agents responsible for their money to adopt the Some commenters believe that current
long-term horizon held by their principals, i.e.,
term value creation, potentially human investors.’’); Travis Baratko, A Times-Mirror public market dynamics subject public
enhancing opportunities for capital Conversation With Sen. Mark Warner, The Loudoun companies to intense pressure to meet
formation, as well as contributing to Times-Mirror (July 27, 2015), available at http:// quarterly performance targets, resulting
greater competition for listings among www.loudountimes.com/news/article/a_loudoun_ in negative consequences for long-term
times_mirror_conversation_with_sen._mark_
national securities exchanges. At the warner432 (quoting Senator Mark Warner as noting value creation.14 One study found that
same time, as LTSE Listings will be an that ‘‘[P]eople being investors who are only focused 80% of chief financial officers of public
entirely optional listing category, the on short-termism, too often you can squeeze a companies acknowledge that they
introduction of LTSE Listings will not quarterly profit out at the expense of a long-term
value proposition.’’).
would forego long-term value creation
impact companies that elect to list on 9 See, e.g., Jay Clayton, Hearing before the Senate initiatives like research and
the Exchange under its existing listing Banking Committee on the Nomination of Jay development in order to avoid missing
rules. Clayton, of New York, to be a Member of the quarterly targets.15 Further, a 2013
Securities and Exchange Commission (March 23,
(2) Background 2017), available at https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/
Thinking at America’s Companies, The Atlantic
CHRG-115shrg24998/html/CHRG-
(A) Concerns about Short-Termism in 115shrg24998.htm (‘‘In my experience, certain
(December 30, 2016), available at https://
the Markets www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/12/
companies view the operational and other pressures
short-term-thinking/511874; Roger L. Martin, Yes,
inherent in quarterly earnings as costly, including
Many academics, commentators, because they detract from long-term planning and
Short-Termism Really is a Problem, Harvard
market participants,8 as well as certain Business Review (October 9, 2015), available at
strategic initiatives’’); Commissioner Daniel M.
https://hbr.org/2015/10/yes-short-termism-really-is-
Gallagher, Activism, Short-Termism, and the SEC:
a-problem.
8 See, e.g., McKinsey & Company, McKinsey Remarks at the 21st Annual Stanford Directors’ 11 New York Stock Exchange, Annual Reported
Global Institute, Measuring the Economic Impact of College (June 23, 2015), available at https://
www.sec.gov/news/speech/activism-short-termism- Volume, Turnover Rate, Reported Trades (2004),
Short-Termism (February 2017), available at http://
and-the-sec.html (‘‘[T]here seems to be a available at http://www.nyxdata.com/nysedata/asp/
www.mckinsey.com/∼/media/mckinsey/
predominance of short-term thinking at the expense factbook/viewer_edition.asp?mode=table&key=
global%20themes/long%20term%20capitalism/
of long-term investing. Some activists are swooping 2206&category=4; World Bank, Stocks Traded,
where%20companies%20with%20a%20long
in, making a lot of noise, and demanding one of a Turnover Ratio of Domestic Shares (2015), available
%20term%20view%20outperform%20their
number of ways to drive a short-term pop in value: at https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/
%20peers/measuring-the-economic-impact-of-
spinning off a profitable division, beginning a share CM.MKT.TRNR?end=2015&locations=
short-termism.ashx (‘‘Our findings show that
buy-back program, or slashing capital expenditures US&start=1975 (hereinafter ‘‘Turnover Ratio of
companies we classify as ‘long term’ outperform
or research and development expenses.’’); Domestic Shares’’).
their shorter-term peers on a range of key economic 12 Ana Avramovic, Credit Suisse Market
and financial metrics.’’); Aspen Institute, American Commissioner Kara M. Stein, Toward Healthy
Prosperity Project (December 2016), available at Companies and a Stronger Economy: Remarks to the Commentary: We’re All High-Frequency Traders
https://assets.aspeninstitute.org/content/uploads/ U.S. Treasury Department’s Corporate Women in Now (March 15, 2017), available at https://
2017/01/American-Prosperity-Project_Policy- Finance Symposium (April 30, 2015), available at edge.credit-suisse.com/edge/Public/Bulletin/
Framework_FINAL-1.3.17.pdf (‘‘Perverse incentives https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/stein-toward- Servefile.aspx?FileID=28410&m=-1290757752.
13 Bidisha Chakrabarty, Pamela C. Moulton and
in our corporate governance system undermine the healthy-companies.html (‘‘The heart of the
health of capitalism itself. Short-termism is baked argument is that short-term pressures from certain Charles Trzcinka, Institutional Holding Periods
into our tax system and is evident in the decisions, investors, and markets in general, compel (April 29, 2013), available at https://
regulations and rules that govern corporations and companies to look narrowly at the short-term. As scholarship.sha.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.
capital markets. Changes to the rules of the game a result, companies become overly focused on cgi?article=1001&context=conf.
meeting quarterly earnings targets. . .To meet these 14 McKinsey Global Institute, Measuring the
are a necessary step to rebuild the public’s trust in
our economic system.’’); Martin Lipton, The New demands, companies have to cut back on capital Economic Impact of Short-Termism (February
Paradigm (January 11, 2017), available at http:// expenditures, research and development, workforce 2017), available at http://www.mckinsey.com/∼/
www.wlrk.com/docs/thenewparadigm.pdf (‘‘The training, and other investments that lead to new media/mckinsey/global%20themes/long%20term
economic impact of a short-term myopic approach innovation, higher productivity, and future %20capitalism/where%20companies%20with
to managing and investing in businesses has growth.’’). %20a%20long%20term%20view%20out
become abundantly clear and has been generating 10 See, e.g., Dominic Barton, Capitalism for the perform%20their%20peers/measuring-the-
rising levels of concern across a broad spectrum of Long Term, Harvard Business Review (March 2011), economic-impact-of-short-termism.ashx. C.f. James
stakeholders, including corporations, investors, available at https://hbr.org/2011/03/capitalism-for- B. Stewart, Amazon Says Long Term And Means It,
policymakers and academics. The proposition that the-long-term; Tragedy of the Horizon Project, The N.Y. Times (December 16, 2011) (noting
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
short-term financial activists and reactive corporate Long and Winding Road: How Long-Only Equity Amazon.com’s willingness to invest in long-term
behavior spur sustainable improvements in Managers Turn Over Their Portfolios Every 1.7 initiatives notwithstanding the impact on its short-
corporate performance, and thereby systemically Years (February 2017), available at http:// term quarterly earnings).
increase rather than undermine long-term economic www.tragedyofthehorizon.com/The-Long-And- 15 John R. Graham, Campbell R. Harvey, Shiva
prosperity and social welfare, has been Winding-Road.pdf; Martin Cremers, Ankur Pareek Rajgopal, Value Destruction and Financial
overwhelmingly disproved by the real world and Zacharias Sautner, Short-Term Investors, Long- Reporting Decisions (September 6, 2006), available
experience of corporate decision-makers as well as Term Investments, and Firm Value (March 14, at https://www0.gsb.columbia.edu/mygsb/faculty/
a growing body of academic research.’’); Chief 2017), available at https://ssrn.com/abstract= research/pubfiles/12924/Rajgopal_value.pdf (‘‘80%
Justice Leo Strine, Who Bleeds When the Wolves 2720248; Alana Semuels, How to Stop Short-Term Continued
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:06 Mar 30, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00133 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02APN1.SGM 02APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_14137/page/2.svg)
![14076 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 63 / Monday, April 2, 2018 / Notices
study found that companies projected to typically did so about 7.6 years after believe that the short-term pressures
just miss their earnings per share founding.22 Since then, that timespan placed on public companies have
(‘‘EPS’’) forecasts by a few cents are has grown longer; between 2001 and discouraged some newer companies
significantly more likely to repurchase 2016, the average age of a company at from conducting initial public
shares than companies that beat their its IPO was nearly 12 years.23 offerings,30 and have led others to go
EPS forecasts by a few cents, suggesting The Exchange believes that these private.31 Indeed, even when newer
efforts to increase EPS through financial trends have significant consequences for companies do undertake an IPO, in
engineering rather than growth.16 At the companies, investors, and the economy recent years many have sought to do so
same time, this study found that in the as a whole. A 2011 report by the IPO in a way that limits the public market’s
calendar year following repurchases, Task Force reported that ‘‘up to 22 short-term pressures, by retaining for
these same companies decreased their million jobs may have been lost’’ as a the founders much of the voting
number of employees, investment in result of the decline in IPOs.24 The control.32
research and development, and capital trend toward companies staying private
also limits the investment opportunities (B) Listing Standards for Long-Term
expenditures, which the study authors
for ordinary investors,25 as most retail Focused Companies and Investors
found suggests that these companies
may have been willing to forego investors are not ‘‘accredited investors’’ The Exchange believes that
investment in long-term growth in order eligible to invest in private placements companies should be able to maintain a
to meet short-term financial targets.17 pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D 26 public listing on an exchange that
The greater focus on short-term under the Securities Act of 1933.27 provides a differentiated choice for
financial performance noted by these Although institutional investors may issuers and investors that prefer listing
commenters also coincides with a provide the investment capital that standards explicitly designed to
reduction in the number of private these companies need, some have promote long-term value creation. While
companies seeking to undertake initial voiced concerns that private markets all companies that may list on the
public offerings (‘‘IPOs’’) and list their lack the transparency, liquidity, price Exchange can focus on long-term value
shares on the U.S. public markets. From discovery, and protections of the public creation, providing a listing category
2001 through 2016, the U.S. averaged marketplace.28 with listing rules that address some of
approximately one-third of the IPOs per Although there are a number of
year than it did each year between 1998 potential causes for the decline in the (March 22, 2017), available at https://research-
number of IPOs and the number of doc.credit-suisse.com/docView?language=
and 2000.18 Calendar year 2016 had the ENG&format=PDF&sourceid=em&document_id=
fewest number of IPOs since the public companies,29 some commenters 1072753661&serialid=h%2B%2FwLdU%2FT
financial crisis years of 2008 and IaitAx1rnamfYsPRAuTFRGdTSF4HZIvTkA%3D
2009,19 although there was a relative 22 Ritter, supra note 18. (suggesting causes including regulatory compliance
23 Id. costs, increased merger and acquisition activity,
increase in 2017.20 The total number of 24 IPO Task Force, Rebuilding the IPO On-Ramp and availability of late-stage venture capital).
listed companies in the United States (October 20, 2011), available at https:// 30 Avi Steinlauf, The Case for Staying Private (and
also fell by almost 50% in the twenty www.sec.gov/info/smallbus/acsec/rebuilding_the_ Why IPOs Are Overrated), Inc., available at https://
year period from 1996 through 2016, ipo_on-ramp.pdf. www.inc.com/avi-steinlauf/why-we-are-staying-
private.html (arguing that public companies are
down from over 8,000 companies listed 25 See U.S. Dept. of the Treasury, A Financial
subject to ‘‘short-term market players [that] have no
on U.S. exchanges in 1996 to 4,333 in System that Creates Economic Opportunities:
Capital Markets at p. 27 (October 2017), available vested long-term interest’’ in the company, while
June of 2016.21 at https://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press- ‘‘private organizations can preserve their focus on
This decline is driven by fewer releases/Documents/A-Financial-System-Capital- what is truly best for the organization’s overall
success’’); Maureen Farrell, America’s Roster of
companies going public, existing public Markets-FINAL-FINAL.pdf (‘‘If a company decides
Public Companies Is Shrinking Before Our Eyes,
companies going private or merging not to go public and instead raises capital in the
private market or as an exempt offering, it could be Wall Street Journal (January 6, 2017), available at
with other public companies, and those subject to investor qualification requirements and/
https://www.wsj.com/articles/americas-roster-of-
companies that undertake an IPO doing public-companies-is-shrinking-before-our-eyes-
or offering limitations. This could result in the
1483545879 (citing University of Michigan Ross
so at a much later stage. Between 1980 average investor being deprived of an opportunity
School of Business professor Jerry Davis, who
and 2000, companies that went public to consider investing in that enterprise.’’).
26 17 CFR 230.506.
believes that ‘‘[t]he dangers of being a public
company are really evident,’’ among them, ‘‘having
27 15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.
of survey participants report that they would an investor base that clamors for short-term stock
28 Commissioner Kara M. Stein, Lighting our
decrease discretionary spending on R&D, gains’’); Jonathan Macey, As IPOs Decline, the
advertising and maintenance to meet an earnings Capital Markets (July 11, 2017), available at https:// Market is Becoming More Elitist, L.A. Times
target’’). www.sec.gov/news/speech/stein-lighting-our- (January 10, 2017), available at http://
16 Heitor Almeida, Vyacheslav Fos, Mathias capital-markets-071117. www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-macey-ipo-
29 Jay R. Ritter, Xiaohui Gao Bakshi, Zhu, democracy-20170110-story.html (Op-Ed by
Kronlund, The Real Effects of Share Repurchases
Zhongyan, Where Have All the IPOs Gone? (August professor Macey noting, among other things, that
(June 8, 2015), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/
26, 2013), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/ ‘‘[o]ne drawback to going public is shareholders’
sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2276156.
17 Id. papers.cfm?abstract_id=1954788 (hypothesizing sometimes excessive focus on short-term stock price
that economies of scope make it more attractive for fluctuations’’).
18 Jay R. Ritter, Initial Public Offerings: Updated
companies to sell themselves to a larger 31 See, e.g., Michael Dell, Going Private is Paying
Statistics (August 8, 2017), available at https:// organization than remain independent); Elisabeth Off for Dell, Wall Street Journal (November 24,
site.warrington.ufl.edu/ritter/files/2017/08/ de Fontenay, The Deregulation of Private Capital 2014) (‘‘As a private company, Dell now has the
IPOs2016Statistics.pdf. and the Decline of the Public Company, Duke Law freedom to take a long-term view. No more pulling
19 Id.
School Public Law & Legal Theory Series No. 2017– R&D and growth investments to make in-quarter
20 Ernst & Young, Global IPO Trends: Q3 2017 numbers . . . No more trade-offs between what’s
33 (April 11, 2017), available at https://
(2017), available at http://www.ey.com/Publication/ papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id= best for a short-term return and what’s best for the
vwLUAssets/ey-global-ipo-trends-q3-2017/$FILE/ey- 2951158 (suggesting that the easing of regulation on long-term success of our customers’’).
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
global-ipo-trends-q3-2017.pdf (noting 111 IPOs in private securities offerings and transactions have 32 Wall Street Journal Business Blog, The Big
the U.S. through the third quarter of 2017, a 35% decreased the incentive for firms to become public); Number (August 17, 2015), available at https://
increase year-over-year). PwC, Considering an IPO? The costs of going and www.wsj.com/articles/the-big-number-1439865699;
21 See U.S. Dept. of the Treasury, A Financial being public may surprise you (September 2012), Ken Bertsch, Snap and the Rise of No-Vote
System that Creates Economic Opportunities: available at http://www.pwc.com/us/en/deals/ Common Shares, Harvard Law School Forum on
Capital Markets at p. 21 (October 2017), available publications/assets/pwc-cost-of-ipo.pdf (discussing Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
at https://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press- cost of initial IPO and remaining public); Michael (May 26, 2017), available at https://
releases/Documents/A-Financial-System-Capital- J. Mauboussin, The Incredible Shrinking Universe corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2017/05/26/snap-and-the-
Markets-FINAL-FINAL.pdf. of Stocks, Credit Suisse Global Financial Strategies rise-of-no-vote-common-shares.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:06 Mar 30, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00134 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02APN1.SGM 02APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_14137/page/3.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 63 / Monday, April 2, 2018 / Notices 14085
ownership in a manner that indicates re-titling ownership of shares due to a process in its governance documents
the name of the ultimate beneficial name change or a change from sole must also provide a process through
owner. By way of example, if ownership to joint ownership with a which a shareholder directly affected by
Investment Fund ABC maintains spouse) rather than an actual change of such a determination may challenge it.
custody of its assets through Bank XYZ, the person holding voting and The Exchange believes that, together,
an LTSE Listings Issuer may recognize investment discretion. this should protect LTSE Listings
Investment Fund ABC as the record Issuers from an attempt by shareholders
(iv) Potential Evasion of Loss of Long-
holder of the shares of an LTSE Listings to improperly sell increased voting
Term Voting Upon Sale
Issuer solely for purposes of this rule if rights to new shareholders, while
Bank XYZ registers the shares on the The ability to accrue long-term voting affording affected shareholders with an
books of the LTSE-Listed Issuer as being is intended to incentivize those opportunity to present additional
owned by ‘‘Bank XYZ, as custodian for beneficial owners with voting and information demonstrating that a change
Investment Fund ABC.’’ The Exchange investment discretion over an LTSE of beneficial ownership has not
believes that maintaining record Listings Issuer’s shares to become long- occurred.
ownership in this manner would allow term shareholders, provide a
mechanism by which such long-term (v) Consistency With the Exchange’s
an LTSE Listings Issuer to track that
shareholders can evidence their long- Voting Rights Policy
[sic] the period of time during which the
shares have been held by the underlying term ownership (i.e., by becoming The Exchange believes that LTSE
investor, even if held through the record holders), and increase the Listings Rule 14A.413(b) is fully
custodian, while meeting the needs of relative role of such long-term consistent with IEX Rule 14.413 (the
those shareholders that wish to shareholders in the governance of an Exchange’s ‘‘Voting Rights Policy’’). The
maintain custody of their assets through LTSE Listings Issuer. There may be Voting Rights Policy provides that the
a separate custodian. situations where it becomes apparent to voting rights of existing shareholders of
an LTSE Listings Issuer that, publicly traded common stock
(iii) Technical Changes in Record notwithstanding the record holder of its registered under Section 12 of the Act
Ownership shares remaining the same, the may not be disparately reduced or
Because of the mechanics of tracking beneficial ownership has changed, in an restricted through any corporate action
long-term ownership, the term of effort to evade the purposes of long-term or issuance. The Voting Rights Policy
ownership for purposes of LTSE voting. For example, the Exchange provides examples of corporate actions
Listings Issuers calculating a recognized the risk that a person may or issuances that could violate this
shareholder’s increased voting rights is create a special-purpose entity (an policy, including the adoption of time-
tied not to the actual date of a ‘‘SPE’’) to hold shares of an LTSE phased voting plans, which could
shareholder’s acquisition or disposition Listings Issuer and register the SPE as encompass structures whereby investors
of beneficial ownership, but the date the the owner of the shares on the books of gain additional voting rights over
shares are transferred into or out of the LTSE Listings Issuer. Over time, the time.65 While the requirements of LTSE
record ownership, i.e., the date that the shares held by the SPE would accrue Listing Rule 14A.413(b) could be
name of the owner on the LTSE Listings additional voting rights. Ordinarily, viewed as similar to time-phased voting
Issuer’s books is changed. The Exchange once those shares are transferred, they plans, the Exchange does not believe
acknowledges that this may result in would lose any accrued long-term that complying with LTSE Listing Rule
situations where technical changes to voting and revert to their Initial Voting 14A.413(b) would be inconsistent with
ownership structure could cause a Power. However, if the person were to the Voting Rights Policy, which bars a
shareholder to lose any accrued long- instead transfer the ownership of the company already listed on the Exchange
term voting. As a general matter, the SPE to a third party, that transfer may from undertaking the prohibited
Exchange believes that a bright-line rule not result in a change of ownership of corporate actions. Because LTSE
that can be clearly and consistently the underlying shares of the LTSE Listings Issuers would be required, as a
applied is preferable to the need to Listings Issuer on the books and records pre-condition to listing on LTSE
analyze the surrounding circumstances of the LTSE Listings Issuer’s transfer Listings, to already have in place a
regarding particular changes to record agent. voting rights structure as of its date of
ownership. Nonetheless, the Exchange To address this situation, proposed its initial listing that complies with
recognizes that particular LTSE Listings Supplementary Material .01(c) to LTSE Listings Rule 14A.413(b), no new
Issuers may wish to allow a shareholder proposed Rule 14A.413 would permit corporate action that disparately
to maintain any accrued long-term (but not require) an LTSE Listings Issuer reduces voting rights would be taken
voting that would otherwise be lost as to include provisions in its governance
a result of technical changes. As a documents such that if its board of 65 Another example of such a corporate action
result, proposed Supplementary directors adopted a resolution enumerated in the Voting Rights Policy is the
issuance of a new class of super-voting stock.
Material .01(d) to proposed Rule reasonably determining that, Proposed Supplementary Material .01(f) to
14A.413 would permit (but not require) notwithstanding technical compliance proposed Rule 14A.413 would provide that for
an LTSE Listings Issuer to adopt a with the provisions of an LTSE Listings purposes of LTSE Listings, a class of securities shall
process by which a shareholder may Issuer’s governance documents relating be considered super-voting stock if (i) the Initial
Voting Power of such class of securities exceeds the
demonstrate that, notwithstanding a to the increasing voting power of long- Initial Voting Power of any of the LTSE Listings
technical change in record ownership, a term shareholders and continuity of Issuer’s existing classes of common stock listed on
change in beneficial ownership for record ownership, there has in fact been LTSE Listings or (ii) the rate at which the voting
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
purposes of this rule has not occurred. a change in beneficial ownership with power of such class may increase over time is
greater than the corresponding rate for any of the
LTSE Listings Issuers choosing to do so respect to shares held of record that LTSE Listings Issuer’s existing classes of common
may develop their own list of changes would evade the purposes of LTSE stock listed on LTSE Listings. An LTSE Listings
for which such waivers may be granted, Listings Rule 14A.413(b), such shares Issuer would not be prohibited by proposed Rule
14.413 from issuing additional shares of a class of
so long as they are of a purely technical may be treated as being entitled only to stock that is listed on LTSE Listings or from issuing
nature that clearly did not involve a their Initial Voting Power. Any LTSE shares of a new class of stock that does not
change of beneficial ownership (such as Listings Issuer that provides for such a constitute super-voting stock as described above.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:06 Mar 30, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00143 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02APN1.SGM 02APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_14137/page/12.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 63 / Monday, April 2, 2018 / Notices 14087
Supplementary Material .01 to proposed with the LTSE Listings Rules, in compliance with LTSE Listing’s long-
Rule 14A.425 would provide that the addition to the Exchange’s other listing term voting provisions.
required stakeholder policies need not rules.
(v) Issuer Designation Requirements and
be stand-alone documents and may be Proposed Rule 14A.435(b) would Dually-Listed Securities
included as part of other LTSE Listings require that the CEO of each LTSE
Issuer policies or reports. Listings Issuer certify annually to the The Exchange proposes to permit an
Exchange that the LTSE Listings Issuer LTSE Listings Issuer to list a class of
(iii) Website Requirements securities that, in connection with its
is in compliance with proposed Rule
Proposed Rule 14A.430 would require Series 14A.400, which contain the initial public offering, has been
LTSE Listings Issuers to have and approved for listing on another national
corporate governance requirements of
maintain a publicly accessible website. securities exchange (‘‘Dually-Listed
the LTSE Listings Rules, qualifying the
In addition, to the extent that an LTSE Securities’’). The Exchange expects that
certification to the extent necessary.
Listings Issuer would be required under this would foster competition among
Various IEX listing rules impose
any applicable provision of the LTSE markets and further the development of
certification requirements,71 and IEX
Listings Rules to make documents the national market system. The
Rule 14.207 requires that a listed
available on or through its website, an Exchange would make an independent
company must provide the Exchange
LTSE Listings Issuer would be required determination of whether such
with prompt notification after an
to ensure that the website is accessible companies satisfy applicable listing
Executive Officer of the company standards and would require such
from the United States, the website
clearly indicates in the English language becomes aware of any noncompliance companies to enter into a dual-listing
the location of such documents on the by the company with the corporate agreement with the Exchange.73 In the
website and that such documents are governance requirements set forth in event that a company chooses to dually-
available in a printable version in the IEX Rule 14.400. However, given the list on both LTSE Listings and another
English language. The Exchange unique nature of the LTSE Listings national securities exchange in
understands that many long-term Rules, the Exchange believes that connection with its IPO, the Exchange
focused investors expect to be able to adding an annual certification would expect such other national
access corporate governance and other requirement for LTSE Listings Issuers securities exchange to be the LTSE
information regarding companies in will assist the CEO and senior Listings Issuer’s ‘‘Primary Listing
which they have invested through the management of such issuers in Market.’’ 74 The Exchange is proposing
company’s website, and accordingly the overseeing and assuring compliance certain additional rules to facilitate
Exchange believes that it is appropriate with LTSE Listings corporate dual-listings.
to explicitly impose this website governance requirements on an ongoing Pursuant to proposed Rule
requirement. For transparency purposes, basis. In addition, the Exchange notes 14A.210(b), an LTSE Listings Issuer that
various proposed LTSE Listings Rules, that another national securities has Dually-Listed Securities would be
as discussed above, would require that exchange similarly requires that the required to notify the Exchange
materials be made available on an LTSE CEO of a company listed on that promptly if it receives oral or written
Listings Issuer’s website.69 exchange certify annually that he or she notification from the other national
Proposed Rule 14A.430 is intended to is not aware of any violation by the securities exchange on which the LTSE
specify in further detail the manner in company of that exchange’s corporate Listings Issuer’s Dually-Listed Securities
which LTSE Listings Issuers may satisfy governance listing standards.72 are listed that such class of listed
these website posting requirements. The Proposed Rule 14A.435(b) would also securities has fallen below the
Exchange notes that the foregoing require each LTSE Listings Issuer CEO continued listing requirements of such
website requirements are substantially certify [sic] annually to the Exchange other market. In addition, such an LTSE
similar to the requirements imposed by that the LTSE Listings Issuer has Listings Issuer would also be required to
the listing rules of another national designated an employee responsible for notify the other national securities
securities exchange.70 ensuring that the voting power of the exchange on which its Dually-Listed
LTSE Listings Issuer’s securities is Securities are listed if it receives oral or
(iv) Certification Requirements determined in accordance with written notification that such class of
Proposed Rule 14A.435 would require proposed Rule 14A.413(b) (Long-Term listed securities has fallen below the
that LTSE Listings Issuers make certain Voting). The Exchange believes that continued listing requirements of
certifications to the Exchange. such an annual certification Chapter 14 of the IEX Rules or the LTSE
Specifically, proposed Rule 14A.435(a) requirement would help ensure that Listings Rules contained in Chapter 14A
would require LTSE Listings Issuers LTSE Listings Issuers establish internal of the IEX Rules.
certify [sic], at or before the time of systems reasonably designed to assure
listing, that all applicable listing criteria 73 The Exchange would also monitor the dually-
have been satisfied. This requirement is 71 See, e.g., IEX Rule 14.202(b) (requiring a listed LTSE Listings Issuer for compliance with all
substantively identical to IEX Rule company listing on the Exchange to certify, at or applicable IEX Rules on an ongoing basis, as it
14.202(b), which requires all issuers before the time of listing, that all applicable listing would for any other LTSE Listings Issuer.
criteria have been satisfied); IEX Rule 14.405(c)(1) 74 Pursuant to proposed Rule 14A.002(a)(14),
listed on the Exchange to submit such (requiring each company listed on the Exchange to ‘‘Primary Listing Market’’ would have the same
a certification. The Exchange proposes certify that it has adopted a formal written audit meaning as that term is defined in the Nasdaq
to repeat this requirement in the LTSE committee charter and that the audit committee will Unlisted Trading Privileges national market system
Listings Rules to clarify that the review and reassess the adequacy of the formal plan and consistent with use of the term ‘‘listing
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
written charter on an annual basis); IEX Rule market’’ in the Consolidated Quotation Service and
certification must include compliance 14.405(d)(1) (requiring each company listed on the Consolidated Tape Association national market
Exchange to certify that it has adopted a formal system plans. Where an LTSE Listings Issuer is
69 See proposed Rules 14A.207(a), 14A.207(f), written compensation committee charter and that dually-listed on another national securities
14A.405(a)(2), 14A.405(b)(1)(B), 14A.405(c)(2)(C), the compensation committee will review and exchange, the initial trading of such issuer’s
14A.405(d)(2), 14A.405(d)(5)(B), 14A.407(a)(2)(B), reassess the adequacy of the formal written charter securities on the Exchange would not occur until
14A.409(b) and 14A.425(b). on an annual basis). after the completion of the opening auction for such
70 See NYSE Listed Company Manual, Rule 72 See NYSE Listed Company Manual, Rule securities on the first day of listing on the Primary
307.00. 303A.12(a). Listing Market.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:06 Mar 30, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00145 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02APN1.SGM 02APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_14137/page/14.svg)
![14092 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 63 / Monday, April 2, 2018 / Notices
an LTSE Listings Issuer may accrue Proposed Rule 14A.500(c) would and protect investors and the public
voting power over time, unlike the provide that in the event that an LTSE interest by providing the marketplace
shares of other Exchange-listed Listings Issuer becomes subject to with a differentiated listing venue
companies, the Exchange believes it is delisting from LTSE Listings for failure choice that seeks to encourage greater
important to explicitly specify in the to satisfy one or more LTSE Listings focus by companies and investors on the
LTSE Listings Rules the date on which Rules but is otherwise in compliance long-term. Specifically, the LTSE
this calculation must be performed. with all other applicable listing rules of Listings Rules are intended to better
The provisions described above are the Exchange, the Exchange may permit enable companies to focus on long-term
designed to clarify how the shareholder such issuer to remain listed on the value creation, potentially enhancing
approval calculation under IEX Rule Exchange, provided that such issuer opportunities for capital formation, and
14.412 would be conducted by an LTSE will cease to be listed on LTSE Listings are also intended to foster transparency
Listings Issuer. All other provisions of and will cease to be an LTSE Listings and effective corporate governance,
IEX Rule 14.412 would continue to Issuer.91 In such cases, the Exchange which would benefit all investors,
apply, including, for example, the would assess whether the issuer is in particularly those with a long-term
financial viability exception in IEX Rule compliance with the Exchange’s focus. In addition, because listing on
14.412(f). continued listing criteria (other than LTSE Listings and becoming subject to
(vii) Failure To Meet LTSE Listings continued listing criteria applicable the LTSE Listings Rules is a voluntary
Standards solely to LTSE Listings Issuers); election, the LTSE Listings Rules are not
however, the issuer would not need to designed to permit unfair
Pursuant to IEX Rule 14.500(a), resubmit a listing application to remain discrimination among issuers.
securities of an Exchange-listed listed on the Exchange. The following subsections provide
company that do not meet the listing additional detail on how the LTSE
standards set forth in Chapters 14 and (viii) Listing Fees for LTSE Listings Listings Rules are designed to further
16 of the Exchange’s rulebook are Issuers the objectives of Section 6(b) of the Act.
subject to potential delisting from the Proposed Rule Series 14A.600 is
Exchange. IEX Rule Series 14.500 sets currently marked ‘‘Reserved.’’ The (1) Board of Directors and Committee
forth procedures for the independent Exchange intends to file a separate Requirements
review, suspension and delisting of proposed rule change with the As described in the Purpose section
companies that fail to satisfy such Commission under Section 19 of the Act under ‘‘Board of Directors and
standards. Proposed Rule 14A.500(a) that would addresses [sic] listing fees Committee Requirements,’’ the
would provide that a failure to meet the applicable to LTSE Listings Issuers. proposed LTSE Listings Rules would
listing standards set forth in the LTSE impose additional obligations on the
2. Statutory Basis boards of directors and board
Listings Rules would be treated as a
failure to meet the listing standards set The Exchange believes that the committees of LTSE Listings Issuers. For
forth in Chapter 14 of the Exchange’s proposed rule change is consistent with example, the LTSE Listings Rules would
rulebook for purposes of IEX Rule Series Section 6(b) of the Act in general,92 and require each LTSE Listings Issuer to
14.500. As a result, the procedures set further the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) establish a board committee dedicated
forth in the IEX Rule Series 14.500 of the Act,93 in particular, in that it is to overseeing the issuer’s strategies for
would apply to any LTSE Listings Issuer designed to prevent fraudulent and creating and sustaining long-term
that fails to comply with the listing manipulative acts and practices, to growth (i.e., an LTSP Committee).
standards in the LTSE Listings Rules, in promote just and equitable principles of Among other things, the LTSP
addition to other applicable listing trade, to foster cooperation and Committee would be required to review
standards in the Exchange’s rulebook. coordination with persons engaged in and approve an LTSE Listings Issuer’s
IEX Rule 14.501(d) provides that if a facilitating transactions in securities, to LTSP Disclosures, including the
company fails to satisfy the Exchange’s remove impediments to and perfect the disclosure of its Long-Term Growth
listing standards, the type of deficiency mechanism of a free and open market Strategy, on at least an annual basis. The
at issue will determine whether the and a national market system and, in Exchange believes that these
company will be immediately general, to protect investors and the requirements would protect investors
suspended or delisted, whether the public interest. and the public interest because it would
company will have an opportunity to As discussed in detail in the Purpose help LTSE Listings Issuers focus on
submit a plan to regain compliance or section above, the Exchange believes long-term goals. The LTSE Listings
whether the company is entitled to an that there is growing concern among Rules would also require LTSE Listings
automatic cure or compliance period market observers that pressures to meet Issuers to establish an independent
before a delisting determination is short-term expectations have resulted in committee dedicated to selecting or
issued. Proposed Rule 14A.500(b) negative consequences for companies, recommending qualified director
would provide that a failure to satisfy investors and the economy as a whole. nominees (i.e., a nominating/corporate
one or more of the LTSE Listings Rules The Exchange believes that the LTSE governance committee). In addition, the
will be treated as a deficiency for which Listings Rules would remove LTSE Listings Rules would require the
a company may submit a plan to regain impediments to a free and open market LTSP Committee, the nominating/
compliance in accordance with the corporate governance committee, the
91 Regardless of whether or not the Exchange
Exchange’s rules. Like all companies compensation committee and the audit
permits an LTSE Listings Issuer to remain listed on
listed on the Exchange, LTSE Listings committee to report regularly to the
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
the Exchange in such circumstances, the Exchange
Issuers will be fully subject to IEX rules would expect the issuer to comply with any board of directors and would require
related to noncompliance and delisting, disclosure obligations relating to the receipt of a that the charters of such committees be
notification of deficiency or delisting determination made available on or through the LTSE
as set forth in Chapter 14 of the as set forth in IEX Rule 14.501(c) and Item 3.01 of
Exchange’s rules. Form 8–K with respect to the termination of its
Listings Issuer’s website. The Exchange
listing on LTSE Listings. believes that these requirements are
calculation under those exchanges’ substantially 92 15 U.S.C. 78f. consistent with the protection of
similar rules as of this date. 93 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). investors and the public interest
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:06 Mar 30, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00150 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02APN1.SGM 02APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_14137/page/19.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 63 / Monday, April 2, 2018 / Notices 14095
Act 98 because it will provide issuers Similarly, other national securities reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which
with an alternative with a differentiated exchanges have adopted categories for the self-regulatory organization
offering as compared to the other listing listed companies that elect to become consents, the Commission will:
rules existing on other national subject to higher standards than other (A) By order approve or disapprove
securities exchanges and the Exchange companies listed on such national such proposed rule change, or
itself. Moreover, as a new listing venue, securities exchange.102 (B) institute proceedings to determine
the Exchange expects to face intense The Exchange also does not believe whether the proposed rule change
competition from existing exchanges. that the proposal will impose any should be disapproved.
Consequently, the degree to which a burden on competition between LTSE IV. Solicitation of Comments
new listing category on the Exchange Listings Issuers that is not necessary or
could impose any burden on appropriate in furtherance of the Interested persons are invited to
intermarket competition is extremely purposes of the Act because all submit written data, views, and
limited, and the Exchange does not companies electing to list on LTSE arguments concerning the foregoing,
believe that such listing category would Listings will be subject to the same including whether the proposed rule
impose any burden on competing standards. Furthermore, where change is consistent with the Act.
venues that is not necessary or appropriate, the LTSE Listings Rules are Comments may be submitted by any of
appropriate in furtherance of the designed to provide LTSE Listings the following methods:
purposes of the Act. In addition, there Issuers with flexibility to implement the Electronic Comments
is no barrier to other exchanges minimum standards contained in the
• Use the Commission’s internet
adopting similar listing standards. To LTSE Listings Rules in ways that are
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/
the extent LTSE Listings is successful in best suited for that issuer’s business.
Finally, the Exchange does not believe rules/sro.shtml); or
attracting issuers to the list on the • Send an email to rule-comments@
Exchange, other exchanges or potential that the transfer agent certification
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
new entrants could respond by adopting requirement under proposed Rule
IEX–2018–06 on the subject line.
their own rules that are designed to 14A.413(b)(5) will impose a burden on
foster long-term value creation. competition with respect to transfer Paper Comments
The Exchange also does not believe agents. While not all transfer agents will • Send paper comments in triplicate
that the proposed rule change will result be able to implement the required to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
in any burden on intramarket software or other systems or processes, and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
competition since becoming subject to any transfer agent can choose to invest NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090.
the supplemental standards in the LTSE the resources necessary to implement All submissions should refer to File
Listings Rules is completely voluntary. such software or other systems or Number SR–IEX–2018–06. This file
Issuers can elect to list on the Exchange processes. Moreover, as noted above, as number should be included on the
without listing on LTSE Listings, or can a new listing venue, the Exchange subject line if email is used. To help the
elect to become subject to the expects to face intense competition from Commission process and review your
heightened standards of the LTSE existing exchanges. Consequently, the comments more efficiently, please use
Listings Rules. The Commission and degree to which a new listing category only one method. The Commission will
Congress have in other contexts on the Exchange could impose any post all comments on the Commission’s
recognized that companies may elect to burden on competition among transfer internet website (http://www.sec.gov/
be subject to greater compliance agents is extremely limited, and the rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
obligations than strictly required, or Exchange does not believe that such submission, all subsequent
elect not to rely on exemptions that may listing category would impose any amendments, all written statements
otherwise be available. For example, in burden on transfer agents that is not with respect to the proposed rule
adopting the Jumpstart Our Business necessary or appropriate in furtherance change that are filed with the
Startups Act,99 Congress provided that of the purposes of the Act. Commission, and all written
emerging growth companies could, but C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s communications relating to the
were not required to, elect to rely on Statement on Comments on the proposed rule change between the
exemptions from various securities law Proposed Rule Change Received From Commission and any person, other than
requirements.100 Similarly, the Members, Participants, or Others those that may be withheld from the
Commission provides that classes of Written comments were neither public in accordance with the
companies, such as Smaller Reporting solicited nor received. provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
Companies, may but are not required to available for website viewing and
provide particular disclosures.101 III. Date of Effectiveness of the printing in the Commission’s Public
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
98 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8). Commission Action Washington, DC 20549 on official
99 Public Law 112–106, 126 Stat. 306 (2012).
Within 45 days of the date of business days between the hours of
100 For example, emerging growth companies
publication of this notice in the Federal 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
may, but ‘‘need not present more than 2 years of
audited financial statements in order for the Register or within such longer period filing also will be available for
registration statement of such emerging growth up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may inspection and copying at the principal
company with respect to an initial public offering designate if it finds such longer period office of the Exchange. All comments
of its common equity securities to be effective . . .’’ received will be posted without change.
to be appropriate and publishes its
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
See Securities Act Section 7(a)(2)(A); 15 U.S.C.
77g(a)(2)(A). Persons submitting comments are
101 See, e.g., Regulation S–K, Item 10(f); 17 CFR comply with the smaller reporting company cautioned that we do not redact or edit
229.10(f) (‘‘[a] smaller reporting company may requirements’’). personal identifying information from
comply with either the requirements applicable to 102 See generally Nasdaq Rule 5000 series
comment submissions. You should
smaller reporting companies or the requirements (containing more stringent listing standards for
applicable to other companies for each item, unless issuers listed on the ‘‘Nasdaq Global Select Market’’
submit only information that you wish
the requirements for smaller reporting companies as compared to those listed on the ‘‘Nasdaq Global to make available publicly. All
specify that smaller reporting companies must Market’’ or the ‘‘Nasdaq Capital Market’’). submissions should refer to File
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:06 Mar 30, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00153 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02APN1.SGM 02APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_14137/page/22.svg)
![14096 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 63 / Monday, April 2, 2018 / Notices
Number SR–IEX–2018–06 and should the proposed rule change and discussed establish and maintain procedures and
be submitted on or before April 23, any comments it received on the internal controls reasonably designed to
2018. proposed rule change. The text of these ensure that Cboe Trading does not
For the Commission, by the Division of statements may be examined at the develop or implement changes to its
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated places specified in Item IV below. The systems on the basis of nonpublic
authority.103 Exchange has prepared summaries, set information obtained as a result of its
Jill Peterson, forth in sections A, B, and C below, of affiliation with the Exchange until such
Assistant Secretary. the most significant aspects of such information is available generally to
[FR Doc. 2018–06568 Filed 3–30–18; 8:45 am]
statements. similarly situated Trading Permit
Holders of the Exchange.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s The Exchange will comply with the
Statement of the Purpose of, and the above-listed conditions prior to offering
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule inbound routing from Cboe Trading. In
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Change
COMMISSION meeting the conditions, the Exchange
1. Purpose will have mechanisms in place to
[Release No. 34–82952; File No. SR–C2– protect the independence of the
2018–004] The Exchange seeks: (1) To adopt
Rule 3.18 to govern the Exchange’s Exchange’s regulatory responsibility
receipt of inbound options orders from with respect to Cboe Trading, as well as
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
the Exchange’s affiliate broker-dealer, demonstrate that Cboe Trading cannot
C2 Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Cboe Trading, Inc. (‘‘Cboe Trading’’), on use any information that it may have
Order Granting Accelerated Approval
behalf of the Exchange’s affiliate options because of its affiliation with the
of a Proposed Rule Change
exchanges, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. Exchange to its advantage.
Concerning an Affiliation Between the Exchange Rule 3.2(f) provides that
Exchange and Cboe Trading and To (‘‘EDGX Options’’) and Cboe BZX
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘BZX Options) and (2) without prior Commission approval, no
Adopt Rules To Permit Inbound Trading Permit Holder may be or
Routing by Cboe Trading approval from the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the become affiliated with the Exchange.
March 27, 2018 ‘‘Commission’’) pursuant to Rule 3.2(f) The Exchange seeks Commission
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the for affiliate Cboe Trading to become a approval for Exchange affiliate Cboe
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Trading Permit Holder of the Exchange. Trading to become a Trading Permit
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 Proposed Rule 3.18 is based on EDGX Holder of the Exchange pursuant to Rule
notice is hereby given that on March 12, Options Rule 2.12. Pursuant to proposed 3.2(f).
2018, Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc. (the Rule 3.18, Cboe Trading’s inbound 2. Statutory Basis
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘C2 Options’’) filed with routing services from EDGX Options
the Securities and Exchange and BZX Options to the Exchange The Exchange believes the proposed
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the would be subject to the following rule change is consistent with the
proposed rule change as described in conditions and limitations: (1) The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Items I and II below, which Items have Exchange must enter into (a) a plan ‘‘Act’’) and the rules and regulations
been prepared by the Exchange. The pursuant to Rule 17d–2 under the thereunder applicable to the Exchange
Commission is publishing this notice to Exchange Act with a non-affiliated self- and, in particular, the requirements of
solicit comments on the proposed rule regulatory organization 3 and (b) a Section 6(b) of the Act.4 Specifically,
change from interested persons and, for regulatory services contract with a non- the Exchange believes the proposed rule
the reasons discussed below, is affiliated SRO to perform regulatory change is consistent with the Section
approving the proposal on an responsibilities for Cboe Trading for 6(b)(5) 5 requirements that the rules of
accelerated basis. unique Exchange rules. (2) The an exchange be designed to prevent
regulatory services contract must fraudulent and manipulative acts and
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s require the Exchange to provide the practices, to promote just and equitable
Statement of the Terms of Substance of non-affiliated self-regulatory principles of trade, to foster cooperation
the Proposed Rule Change organization with information, in an and coordination with persons engaged
The Exchange proposes to adopt rules easily accessible manner, regarding all in regulating, clearing, settling,
related to the inbound router for C2 exception reports, alerts, complaints, processing information with respect to,
Options. trading errors, cancellations, and facilitating transactions in
The text of the proposed rule change investigations, and enforcement matters securities, to remove impediments to
is also available on the Exchange’s (collectively, ‘‘Exceptions’’) in which and perfect the mechanism of a free and
website (http://www.c2exchange.com/ Cboe Trading is identified as a open market and a national market
Legal/), at the Exchange’s Office of the participant that has potentially violated system, and, in general, to protect
Secretary, and at the Commission’s Exchange or Commission rules, and investors and the public interest.
Public Reference Room. shall require that the non-affiliated self- Additionally, the Exchange believes the
regulatory organization provide a report proposed rule change is consistent with
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s the Section 6(b)(5) 6 requirement that
to the Exchange quantifying all such
Statement of the Purpose of, and the rules of an exchange not be designed
exception reports, alerts, complaints,
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule to permit unfair discrimination between
trading errors, cancellations,
Change customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
investigations and enforcement matters
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
In its filing with the Commission, the on not less than a quarterly basis. (3) In particular, the Exchange believes
Exchange included statements The Exchange, on behalf of its parent that the rule change promotes the
concerning the purpose of and basis for company, Cboe Global Markets, must maintenance of a fair and orderly
103 17CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 3 The Exchange will ensure a 17d–2 plan is in 4 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
place prior to offering inbound routing from Cboe
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. Trading. 6 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:06 Mar 30, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00154 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02APN1.SGM 02APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_14137/page/23.svg)
Document Created: 2018-11-01 09:08:59
Document Modified: 2018-11-01 09:08:59
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 14074 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR