83 FR 14379 - Olives Grown in California; Decreased Assessment Rate
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 65 (April 4, 2018)
Agricultural Marketing Service
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 65 (April 4, 2018)
| Page Range | 14379-14381 | |
| FR Document | 2018-06877 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 4, 2018)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 14379-14381] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-06877] ======================================================================== Proposed Rules Federal Register ________________________________________________________________________ This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules. ======================================================================== Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 65 / Wednesday, April 4, 2018 / Proposed Rules [[Page 14379]] DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Marketing Service 7 CFR Part 932 [Doc. No. AMS-SC-18-0001; SC18-932-1 PR] Olives Grown in California; Decreased Assessment Rate AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA. ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This proposed rule would implement a recommendation from the California Olive Committee (Committee) to decrease the assessment rate established for the 2018 fiscal year and subsequent fiscal years. The assessment rate would remain in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated. DATES: Comments must be received by May 4, 2018. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments concerning this proposed rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or internet: http://www.regulations.gov. Comments should reference the document number and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and will be available for public inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk during regular business hours, or can be viewed at: http://www.regulations.gov. All comments submitted in response to this proposed rule will be included in the record and will be made available to the public. Please be advised that the identity of the individuals or entities submitting the comments will be made public on the internet at the address provided above. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter Sommers, Marketing Specialist or Jeffrey Smutny, Regional Director, California Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906, or Email: [email protected] or [email protected]. Small businesses may request information on complying with this regulation by contacting Richard Lower, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, proposes an amendment to regulations issued to carry out a marketing order as defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This proposed rule is issued under Marketing Agreement and Order No. 932, as amended (7 CFR part 932), regulating the handling of olives grown in California. Part 932 (referred to as the ``Order'') is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.'' The Committee locally administers the Order and is comprised of producers and handlers of olives operating within the area of production. The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in conformance with Executive Orders 13563 and 13175. This action falls within a category of regulatory actions that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive Order 12866 review. Additionally, because this rule does not meet the definition of a significant regulatory action, it does not trigger the requirements contained in Executive Order 13771. See OMB's Memorandum titled ``Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of the Executive Order of January 30, 2017, titled `Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs' '' (February 2, 2017). This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. Under the Order now in effect, California olive handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to administer the Order are derived from such assessments. It is intended that the proposed assessment rate would be applicable to all assessable olives beginning on January 1, 2018, and continue until amended, suspended, or terminated. The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling. This proposed rule would decrease the assessment rate for the 2018 and subsequent fiscal years from $26.00 to $24.00 per ton of assessed olives. The Order provides authority for the Committee, with the approval of USDA, to formulate an annual budget of expenses and collect assessments from handlers to administer the program. The members of the Committee are producers and handlers of olives in California. They are familiar with the Committee's needs and with the costs for goods and services in their local area and are thus in a position to formulate an appropriate budget and assessment rate. The assessment rate is formulated in a public meeting where all directly affected persons have an opportunity to participate and provide input in budget matters. For the 2015 and subsequent fiscal years, the Committee recommended, and USDA approved, an assessment rate of $26.00 per ton of assessed olives. That rate would continue in effect unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation and information submitted by the Committee, or other information available to USDA. The Committee met on December 13, 2017, and unanimously recommended 2018 expenditures of $1,940,477, and an assessment rate of $24.00 per ton of assessed olives. In comparison, last [[Page 14380]] year's budgeted expenditures were $1,752,366. The proposed assessment rate of $24.00 is $2.00 lower than the rate currently in effect. Producer receipts show a yield of 83,799 tons of assessable olives from the 2017 crop year. This is higher than the 2016 crop year, which yielded 63,000 tons of assessable olives. The 2018 fiscal year assessment rate decrease is necessary to ensure the Committee has sufficient revenue to fund the recommended 2018 budgeted expenditures while ensuring the funds in the financial reserve would be kept within the maximum permitted by Sec. 932.40. The Order has a fiscal year and a crop year that are independent of each other. The crop year is a 12-month period that begins on August 1 of each year and ends on July 31 of the following year. The fiscal year is the 12-month period that begins on January 1 and ends on December 31 of each year. Olives are an alternate-bearing crop, with a small crop followed by a large crop. For this assessment rate proposed rule, the actual 2017 crop year receipts are used to determine the assessment rate for the 2018 fiscal year. The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for 2018 includes $401,200 for program administration, $973,500 for marketing activities, and $297,777 for research. Budgeted expenses for these items during the 2017 fiscal year were $513,100 for program administration, $823,500 for marketing activities, and $317,766 for research. The assessment rate recommended by the Committee resulted from consideration of anticipated fiscal year expenses, actual olive tonnage received by handers during the 2017 crop year, and the amount in the Committee's financial reserve. Income derived from handler assessments, along with interest income and funds from the Committee's authorized reserve will be adequate to cover budgeted expenses. Funds in the reserve will be kept within the maximum permitted by the Order of approximately one fiscal year's expenses. The proposed assessment rate would continue in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation and information submitted by the Committee or other available information. Although this assessment rate would be in effect for an indefinite period, the Committee would continue to meet prior to or during each fiscal year to recommend a budget of expenses and consider recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and times of Committee meetings are available from the Committee or USDA. Committee meetings are open to the public and interested persons may express their views at these meetings. USDA would evaluate Committee recommendations and other available information to determine whether modification of the assessment rate is needed. Further rulemaking would be undertaken as necessary. The Committee's budget for subsequent fiscal years would be reviewed and, as appropriate, approved by USDA. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the economic impact of this proposed rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis. The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in that they are brought about through group action of essentially small entities acting on their own behalf. There are approximately 1,100 producers of olives in the production area and two handlers subject to regulation under the Order. Small agricultural producers are defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) as those having annual receipts less than $750,000, and small agricultural service firms are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than $7,500,000 (13 CFR 121.201). Based upon National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) information, the average price to producers for the 2016 crop year was $865.00 per ton, and total assessable volume for the 2017 crop year was 83,799 tons. Based on production, price paid to producer, and the total number of California olive producers, the average annual producer revenue is less than $750,000 ($865.00 times 83,799 equals $72,486,135, divided by 1,100 producers equals an average annual producer revenue of $65,896). Thus, the majority of olive producers may be classified as small entities. Both of the handlers may be classified as large entities under the SBA's definitions because of their annual receipts are greater than $7,500,000. This proposal would decrease the assessment rate collected from handlers for the 2018 and subsequent fiscal years from $26.00 to $24.00 per ton of assessable olives. The Committee unanimously recommended 2018 expenditures of $1,940,477 and an assessment rate of $24.00 per ton of assessable olives. The recommended assessment rate of $24.00 is $2.00 lower than the 2017 rate. The quantity of assessable olives for the 2017 crop year is 83,799 tons. Thus, the $24.00 rate should provide $2,011,176. The lower assessment rate is possible because annual receipts for the 2017 crop year are 83,799 tons compared to 63,000 tons for the 2016 crop year. Olives are an alternate-bearing crop, with a small crop followed by a large crop. Income derived from the $24.00 per ton assessment rate, along with funds from the authorized reserve and interest income, should be adequate to meet this fiscal year's expenses. The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2018 fiscal year include $401,200 for program administration, $973,500 for marketing activities, and $297,777 for research. Budgeted expenses for these items during the 2017 fiscal year were $513,100 for program administration, $823,500 for marketing activities, and $317,766 for research. The Committee deliberated on many of the expenses, weighed the relative value of various programs or projects, and increased their expenses for marketing and research activities. The Committee decreased their inspection costs because expenses incurred in previous years towards the development of electronic reporting and optical sizing projects have been completed and, as a result, the industry is able to utilize new, cost saving procedures. Prior to arriving at this budget and assessment rate, the Committee considered information from various sources including the Committee's Executive, Marketing, Inspection, and Research Subcommittees. Alternate expenditure levels were discussed by these groups, based upon the relative value of various projects to the olive industry and the increased olive production. The assessment rate of $24.00 per ton of assessable olives was derived by considering anticipated expenses, the volume of assessable olives, and additional pertinent factors. A review of NASS information indicates that the average producer price for the 2016 crop year was $865.00 per ton. Therefore, utilizing the assessment rate of $24.00 per ton, the assessment revenue for the 2018 fiscal year as a percentage of total producer revenue would be approximately 2.77 percent. [[Page 14381]] This action would decrease the assessment rate collected from handlers for the 2018 and subsequent fiscal years. Assessments are applied uniformly on all handlers, and some of the costs may be passed on to producers. However, decreasing the assessment rate would reduce the burden on handlers, and may reduce the burden on producers. In addition, the Committee's meeting was widely publicized throughout the production area. The olive industry and all interested persons were invited to attend the meeting and participate in Committee deliberations on all issues. Like all Committee meetings, the December 13, 2017, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and small, were able to express views on this issue. Finally, interested persons are invited to submit comments on this proposed rule, including the regulatory and information collection impacts of this action on small businesses. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Order's information collection requirements have been previously approved by OMB and assigned OMB No. 0581-0178. No changes in those requirements as a result of this action are necessary. Should any changes become necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for approval. This proposed rule would impose no additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements on either small or large California olive handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry and public sector agencies. AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information and services, and for other purposes. USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this action. A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. Any questions about the compliance guide should be sent to Richard Lower at the previously-mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. A 30-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to respond to this proposed rule. All written comments timely received will be considered before a final determination is made on this rule. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 932 Marketing agreements, Olives, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 932 is proposed to be amended as follows: PART 932--OLIVES GROWN IN CALIFORNIA 0 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 932 continues to read as follows: Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674. 0 2. Section 932.230 is revised to read as follows: Sec. 932.230 Assessment rate. On and after January 1, 2018, an assessment rate of $24.00 per ton is established for California olives. Dated: March 30, 2018. Bruce Summers, Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service. [FR Doc. 2018-06877 Filed 4-3-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
![14379
Proposed Rules Federal Register
Vol. 83, No. 65
Wednesday, April 4, 2018
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER California Marketing Field Office, beginning on January 1, 2018, and
contains notices to the public of the proposed Marketing Order and Agreement continue until amended, suspended, or
issuance of rules and regulations. The Division, Specialty Crops Program, terminated.
purpose of these notices is to give interested AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487– The Act provides that administrative
persons an opportunity to participate in the 5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or Email: proceedings must be exhausted before
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
PeterR.Sommers@ams.usda.gov or parties may file suit in court. Under
Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov. section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
Small businesses may request handler subject to an order may file
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE information on complying with this with USDA a petition stating that the
regulation by contacting Richard Lower, order, any provision of the order, or any
Agricultural Marketing Service Marketing Order and Agreement obligation imposed in connection with
Division, Specialty Crops Program, the order is not in accordance with law
7 CFR Part 932 AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence and request a modification of the order
Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington, or to be exempted therefrom. Such
[Doc. No. AMS–SC–18–0001; SC18–932–1
PR] DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720– handler is afforded the opportunity for
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email: a hearing on the petition. After the
Olives Grown in California; Decreased Richard.Lower@ams.usda.gov. hearing, USDA would rule on the
Assessment Rate SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This petition. The Act provides that the
action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, district court of the United States in any
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, proposes an amendment to regulations district in which the handler is an
USDA. issued to carry out a marketing order as inhabitant, or has his or her principal
ACTION: Proposed rule. defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This proposed place of business, has jurisdiction to
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would rule is issued under Marketing review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
implement a recommendation from the Agreement and Order No. 932, as provided an action is filed not later than
California Olive Committee (Committee) amended (7 CFR part 932), regulating 20 days after the date of the entry of the
to decrease the assessment rate the handling of olives grown in ruling.
established for the 2018 fiscal year and California. Part 932 (referred to as the This proposed rule would decrease
subsequent fiscal years. The assessment ‘‘Order’’) is effective under the the assessment rate for the 2018 and
rate would remain in effect indefinitely Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act subsequent fiscal years from $26.00 to
unless modified, suspended, or of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), $24.00 per ton of assessed olives.
terminated. hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’ The The Order provides authority for the
Committee locally administers the Committee, with the approval of USDA,
DATES: Comments must be received by Order and is comprised of producers to formulate an annual budget of
May 4, 2018. and handlers of olives operating within expenses and collect assessments from
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are the area of production. handlers to administer the program. The
invited to submit written comments The Department of Agriculture members of the Committee are
concerning this proposed rule. (USDA) is issuing this rule in producers and handlers of olives in
Comments must be sent to the Docket conformance with Executive Orders California. They are familiar with the
Clerk, Marketing Order and Agreement 13563 and 13175. This action falls Committee’s needs and with the costs
Division, Specialty Crops Program, within a category of regulatory actions for goods and services in their local area
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence that the Office of Management and and are thus in a position to formulate
Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington, Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive an appropriate budget and assessment
DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or Order 12866 review. Additionally, rate. The assessment rate is formulated
internet: http://www.regulations.gov. because this rule does not meet the in a public meeting where all directly
Comments should reference the definition of a significant regulatory affected persons have an opportunity to
document number and the date and action, it does not trigger the participate and provide input in budget
page number of this issue of the Federal requirements contained in Executive matters.
Register and will be available for public Order 13771. See OMB’s Memorandum For the 2015 and subsequent fiscal
inspection in the Office of the Docket titled ‘‘Interim Guidance Implementing years, the Committee recommended,
Clerk during regular business hours, or Section 2 of the Executive Order of and USDA approved, an assessment rate
can be viewed at: http:// January 30, 2017, titled ‘Reducing of $26.00 per ton of assessed olives.
www.regulations.gov. All comments Regulation and Controlling Regulatory That rate would continue in effect
submitted in response to this proposed Costs’ ’’ (February 2, 2017). unless modified, suspended, or
rule will be included in the record and This proposed rule has been reviewed terminated by USDA upon
will be made available to the public.
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS
under Executive Order 12988, Civil recommendation and information
Please be advised that the identity of the Justice Reform. Under the Order now in submitted by the Committee, or other
individuals or entities submitting the effect, California olive handlers are information available to USDA.
comments will be made public on the subject to assessments. Funds to The Committee met on December 13,
internet at the address provided above. administer the Order are derived from 2017, and unanimously recommended
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: such assessments. It is intended that the 2018 expenditures of $1,940,477, and an
Peter Sommers, Marketing Specialist or proposed assessment rate would be assessment rate of $24.00 per ton of
Jeffrey Smutny, Regional Director, applicable to all assessable olives assessed olives. In comparison, last
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:08 Apr 03, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\04APP1.SGM 04APP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_14444/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 65 / Wednesday, April 4, 2018 / Proposed Rules 14381
This action would decrease the considered before a final determination ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
assessment rate collected from handlers is made on this rule. identified by docket number USCG–
for the 2018 and subsequent fiscal years. 2018–0088 using the Federal
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 932
Assessments are applied uniformly on eRulemaking Portal at http://
all handlers, and some of the costs may Marketing agreements, Olives, www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
be passed on to producers. However, Reporting and recordkeeping Participation and Request for
decreasing the assessment rate would requirements. Comments’’ portion of the
reduce the burden on handlers, and may For the reasons set forth in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
reduce the burden on producers. preamble, 7 CFR part 932 is proposed to further instructions on submitting
In addition, the Committee’s meeting be amended as follows: comments.
was widely publicized throughout the
PART 932—OLIVES GROWN IN FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
production area. The olive industry and
CALIFORNIA you have questions about this proposed
all interested persons were invited to
rulemaking, call or email Mr. Ronald
attend the meeting and participate in
■ 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR Houck, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Committee deliberations on all issues.
part 932 continues to read as follows: Maryland-National Capital Region;
Like all Committee meetings, the
telephone 410–576–2674, email
December 13, 2017, meeting was a Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
public meeting and all entities, both Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil.
■ 2. Section 932.230 is revised to read SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
large and small, were able to express as follows:
views on this issue. Finally, interested I. Table of Abbreviations
persons are invited to submit comments § 932.230 Assessment rate.
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
on this proposed rule, including the On and after January 1, 2018, an COTP Captain of the Port
regulatory and information collection assessment rate of $24.00 per ton is DHS Department of Homeland Security
impacts of this action on small established for California olives. E.O. Executive Order
businesses. Dated: March 30, 2018. FR Federal Register
In accordance with the Paperwork NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Bruce Summers,
Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C. § Section
Chapter 35), the Order’s information Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing U.S.C. United States Code
Service.
collection requirements have been II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
previously approved by OMB and [FR Doc. 2018–06877 Filed 4–3–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
Basis
assigned OMB No. 0581–0178. No
changes in those requirements as a On June 13, 2017, Charcot-Marie-
result of this action are necessary. Tooth Association of Trappe, MD,
Should any changes become necessary, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND notified the Coast Guard that it will be
they would be submitted to OMB for SECURITY conducting the swim portion of the
approval. Oxford Biathlon from 9:15 a.m. until
This proposed rule would impose no Coast Guard 10:15 a.m. on June 9, 2018, and if
additional reporting or recordkeeping necessary, due to inclement weather,
requirements on either small or large 33 CFR Part 100 from 9:15 a.m. until 10:15 a.m. on June
California olive handlers. As with all [Docket Number USCG–2018–0088] 10, 2018. The swim consists of
Federal marketing order programs, approximately 30 participants
RIN 1625–AA08 competing on a designated 1300-meter
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information course that starts at the ferry dock at
Special Local Regulation; Tred Avon
requirements and duplication by Bellevue, MD and finishes at the Tred
River, Between Bellevue, MD and
industry and public sector agencies. Avon Yacht Club at Oxford, MD.
Oxford, MD
AMS is committed to complying with Hazards from the swim competition
the E-Government Act, to promote the AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. include participants swimming within
use of the internet and other ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. and adjacent to the designated
information technologies to provide navigation channel and interfering with
increased opportunities for citizen SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to vessels intending to operate within that
access to Government information and establish special local regulations for channel, as well as swimming within
services, and for other purposes. certain waters of the Tred Avon River. approaches to public and private
USDA has not identified any relevant This action is necessary to provide for marinas and public boat facilities. The
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or the safety of life on the navigable waters COTP Maryland-National Capital
conflict with this action. located between Bellevue, MD, and Region has determined that potential
A small business guide on complying Oxford, MD, during a swim event on hazards associated with the swim would
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop June 9, 2018. If necessary, due to be a safety concern for anyone intending
marketing agreements and orders may inclement weather, the event will be to participate in this event or for vessels
be viewed at: http://www.ams.usda.gov/ rescheduled to June 10, 2018. This that operate within specified waters of
rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. proposed rulemaking would prohibit the Tred Avon River between Bellevue,
Any questions about the compliance persons and vessels from entering the MD, and Oxford, MD.
regulated area unless authorized by the
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS
guide should be sent to Richard Lower The purpose of this rulemaking is to
at the previously-mentioned address in Captain of the Port Maryland-National protect event participants, spectators
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Capital Region or the Coast Guard Patrol and transiting vessels on specified
section. Commander. We invite your comments waters of the Tred Avon River before,
A 30-day comment period is provided on this proposed rulemaking. during, and after the scheduled event.
to allow interested persons to respond DATES: Comments and related material The Coast Guard proposes this
to this proposed rule. All written must be received by the Coast Guard on rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C.
comments timely received will be or before May 4, 2018. 1233, which authorize the Coast Guard
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:08 Apr 03, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\04APP1.SGM 04APP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_14444/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-11-01 09:11:10
Document Modified: 2018-11-01 09:11:10
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Comments must be received by May 4, 2018. | |
| Contact | Peter Sommers, Marketing Specialist or Jeffrey Smutny, Regional Director, California Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906, or Email: [email protected] or [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 14379 | |
| CFR Associated | Marketing Agreements; Olives and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR