83 FR 14801 - Security Zone, Seattle's Seafair Fleet Week Moving Vessels, Puget Sound, WA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 67 (April 6, 2018)

Page Range		14801-14803
FR Document		2018-07026

The Coast Guard proposes to amend its Seattle Seafair Fleet Week Moving Vessels Security Zone regulation. This amendment would change the information in annual notices of enforcement that are published both in the Federal Register and Local Notice to Mariners. This action is necessary because last minute changes in the vessels participating in the Parade of Ships during Fleet Week prevent the Coast Guard from identifying the designated participating vessels in the Federal Register within the allotted timeframe. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 67 (Friday, April 6, 2018)

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 67 (Friday, April 6, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 14801-14803]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-07026]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2018-0105]
RIN 1625-AA87


Security Zone, Seattle's Seafair Fleet Week Moving Vessels, Puget 
Sound, WA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to amend its Seattle Seafair Fleet 
Week Moving Vessels Security Zone regulation. This amendment would 
change the information in annual notices of enforcement that are 
published both in the Federal Register and Local Notice to Mariners. 
This action is necessary because last minute changes in the vessels 
participating in the Parade of Ships during Fleet Week prevent the 
Coast Guard from identifying the designated participating vessels in 
the Federal Register within the allotted timeframe. We invite your 
comments on this proposed rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast 
Guard on or before May 21, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2018-0105 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for 
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further 
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed 
rule, call or email Petty Officer Zachary Spence, Sector Puget Sound 
Waterways Management Branch, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 206-217-6051, 
email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    On July 10, 2012 (77 FR 40521), the Coast Guard Captain of the 
Port, Sector Puget Sound, published a final rule that became effective 
Aug. 1, 2012; the Seattle's Seafair Fleet Week Moving Vessels security 
zone. That final rule establishes a security zone around designated 
participating vessels that are not protected by the Naval Vessel 
Protection Zone in Seattle's Seafair Fleet Week Parade of Ships. 
Designated participating vessels are named by the Coast Guard each year 
prior to the event in a Federal Register notice, as well as the Local 
Notice to Mariners. These security zones are necessary to help ensure 
the security of the vessels from sabotage or other subversive acts.
    The purpose of this rulemaking is to amend the information required 
in the Notice of Enforcement published in the Federal Register and 
Local Notice to Mariner and add the requirement to publish the names of 
participating vessel in a Broadcast Notice to Mariners before the 
scheduled event. The Coast Guard proposes this rulemaking under 
authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The Captain of the Port Puget Sound proposes to amend the 
provisions in 33 CFR 165.1333 regarding information published in the 
notice of enforcement for the annual security zone for Seattle's 
Seafair Fleet Weeks Parade of Ships. Currently, the Coast Guard 
publishes the names of the vessels participating in the Parade of 
Ships, in a notice of enforcement at least 3 days prior to the 
beginning of Seattle's Seafair. These are military vessels. In past 
years, some vessels participating in the Parade of Ships changed their 
plans due to operational needs, and as a result, the changes precluded 
the Coast Guard from providing sufficient notice in the Federal 
Register. This proposed amendment is necessary because the changing 
schedules of vessels sometimes makes it impossible to know which 
vessels will ultimately participate in the Parade of Ships and

[[Page 14802]]

also provide timely notice in the Federal Register.
    The Coast Guard proposes to amend the information required in the 
notice of enforcement to only include the date and time of the Parade 
of Ships, and not the names of the vessels. In order to provide notice 
to the public regarding the vessels requiring the security zone, the 
Coast Guard will provide notice to the public of the designated 
participating vessels by issuing a Broadcast Notice to Mariners before 
and during the event. In addition, the security zone will be enforced 
with actual notice during the Seattle Seafair Fleet Week each year. The 
regulatory text we are proposing appears at the end of this document.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes 
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our 
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and 
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control 
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been 
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt 
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the fact that this 
rule would only change the mean in which the public will be notified 
about the security zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this 
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
security zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic 
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what 
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect 
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you 
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that 
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action 
of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of 
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and 
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under 
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or 
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not 
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule 
elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland 
Security Directive 023-01, which guides the Coast Guard in complying 
with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-
4370f), and have made a preliminary determination that this action is 
one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively 
have a significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule 
involves amending the way in which the Coast Guard will notify the 
public which vessels are designated participants in Seattle's Seafair 
Fleet Week. Normally such actions are categorically excluded from 
further review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS 
Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A preliminary Record of 
Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available 
in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or 
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant 
environmental impact from this proposed rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places, or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking, 
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment 
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If 
you submit a comment, please include the

[[Page 14803]]

docket number for this rulemaking, indicate the specific section of 
this document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for 
each suggestion or recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be 
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate 
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted 
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any 
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the 
docket, visit http://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket, 
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's 
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up 
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a 
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes 
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.

0
2. Amend Sec.  165.1333 by revising paragraphs (a) and (e) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  165.1333   Security Zones, Seattle's Seafair Fleet Week moving 
vessels, Puget Sound, WA.

    (a) Location. The following areas are security zones: all navigable 
waters within 500 yards of each designated participating vessel in the 
Parade of Ships while each such vessel is in the Sector Puget Sound 
Captain of the Port (COTP) zone, as defined in 33 CFR 3.65-10, during a 
time specified in paragraph (e) of this section.
* * * * *
    (e) Annual enforcement period. The security zones described in 
paragraph (a) of this section will be enforced with actual notice 
during Seattle Seafair Fleet Week each year for a period of up to 1 
week. The Seattle Seafair Fleet Week will occur annually sometime 
between July 25 and August 14. The Coast Guard will publish an annual 
notice enforcement containing the dates that this section will be 
enforced in the Federal Register and Local Notice to Mariners. A 
Broadcast Notice to Mariners will also be issued before the start of 
the Seattle Seafair Fleet Week to identify the designated participating 
vessels for that year.

    Dated: April 2, 2018.
Linda A. Sturgis,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2018-07026 Filed 4-5-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 67 / Friday, April 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules 14801

■ 3. Subpart C is amended by adding (9) Proceed southwest along State Spence, Sector Puget Sound Waterways
§ 9.___to read as follows: Highway 18 for 0.3 miles to the Management Branch, U.S. Coast Guard;
intersection of the highway with Red telephone 206–217–6051, email
§ 9.___ Van Duzer Corridor.
Prairie Road; then SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil.
(a) Name. The name of the viticultural (10) Proceed south along Red Prairie SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
area described in this section is ‘‘Van Road for approximately 5.3 miles,
Duzer Corridor’’. For purposes of part 4 returning to the beginning point. I. Table of Abbreviations
of this chapter, ‘‘Van Duzer Corridor’’ is CFR Code of Federal Regulations
a term of viticultural significance. Signed: November 30, 2017.
DHS Department of Homeland Security
(b) Approved maps. The five United John J. Manfreda,
FR Federal Register
States Geological Survey (USGS) Administrator. NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
1:24,000 scale topographic maps used to Approved: March 30, 2018. § Section
determine the boundary of the Van Timothy E. Skud, U.S.C. United States Code
Duzer Corridor viticultural area are Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
titled: Tariff Policy).
(1) Sheridan, Oreg., 1956; revised Basis
[FR Doc. 2018–07089 Filed 4–5–18; 8:45 am]
1992; On July 10, 2012 (77 FR 40521), the
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
(2) Ballston, Oreg., 1956; revised Coast Guard Captain of the Port, Sector
1992; Puget Sound, published a final rule that
(3) Dallas, Oreg., 1974; photorevised became effective Aug. 1, 2012; the
1986; DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND Seattle’s Seafair Fleet Week Moving
(4) Amity, Oreg., 1957; revised 1993; SECURITY Vessels security zone. That final rule
and establishes a security zone around
(5) Rickreall, Oreg., 1969; Coast Guard
designated participating vessels that are
photorevised 1976; not protected by the Naval Vessel
(c) Boundary. The Van Duzer Corridor 33 CFR Part 165
Protection Zone in Seattle’s Seafair Fleet
viticultural area is located in Polk and Week Parade of Ships. Designated
[Docket Number USCG–2018–0105]
Yamhill Counties, in Oregon. The participating vessels are named by the
boundary of the Van Duzer Corridor RIN 1625–AA87 Coast Guard each year prior to the event
viticultural area is as described below: in a Federal Register notice, as well as
(1) The beginning point is on the Security Zone, Seattle’s Seafair Fleet
the Local Notice to Mariners. These
Sheridan map at the intersection of Week Moving Vessels, Puget Sound,
security zones are necessary to help
State Highway 22 and Red Prairie Road. WA
From the beginning point, proceed ensure the security of the vessels from
southeasterly along State Highway 22 AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. sabotage or other subversive acts.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. The purpose of this rulemaking is to
for a total of 12.4 miles, crossing over
amend the information required in the
the Ballston and Dallas maps and onto
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to Notice of Enforcement published in the
the Rickreall map, to the intersection of
the highway with the 200-foot elevation amend its Seattle Seafair Fleet Week Federal Register and Local Notice to
contour west of the Oak Knoll Golf Moving Vessels Security Zone Mariner and add the requirement to
Course; then regulation. This amendment would publish the names of participating
(2) Proceed north on the 200-foot change the information in annual vessel in a Broadcast Notice to Mariners
elevation contour, crossing onto the notices of enforcement that are before the scheduled event. The Coast
Amity map, to the third intersection of published both in the Federal Register Guard proposes this rulemaking under
the elevation contour with Frizzell and Local Notice to Mariners. This authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.
Road; then action is necessary because last minute III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
(3) Proceed east on Frizzell Road for changes in the vessels participating in
0.3 mile to the intersection of the road the Parade of Ships during Fleet Week The Captain of the Port Puget Sound
with Oak Grove Road; then prevent the Coast Guard from proposes to amend the provisions in 33
(4) Proceed north along Oak Grove identifying the designated participating CFR 165.1333 regarding information
Road for 1.7 miles to the intersection of vessels in the Federal Register within published in the notice of enforcement
the road with Zena Road; then the allotted timeframe. We invite your for the annual security zone for Seattle’s
(5) Proceed east on Zena Road for comments on this proposed rulemaking. Seafair Fleet Weeks Parade of Ships.
approximately 0.25 mile to the second DATES: Comments and related material
Currently, the Coast Guard publishes
intersection of the road with the 200- must be received by the Coast Guard on the names of the vessels participating in
foot elevation contour; then or before May 21, 2018. the Parade of Ships, in a notice of
(6) Proceed northwest along the 200- enforcement at least 3 days prior to the
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
foot elevation contour to the beginning of Seattle’s Seafair. These are
identified by docket number USCG– military vessels. In past years, some
intersection of the elevation contour 2018–0105 using the Federal
with Oak Grove Road; then vessels participating in the Parade of
eRulemaking Portal at http:// Ships changed their plans due to
(7) Proceed north along Oak Grove
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public operational needs, and as a result, the
Road (which becomes Old Bethel Road)
Participation and Request for
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS

approximately 7.75 miles to the changes precluded the Coast Guard from
Comments’’ portion of the providing sufficient notice in the
intersection of the road with Patty Lane;
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
then Federal Register. This proposed
(8) Proceed west in a straight line for further instructions on submitting amendment is necessary because the
a total of 10.8 miles, crossing over the comments. changing schedules of vessels
Ballston map and onto the Sheridan FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If sometimes makes it impossible to know
map, to the intersection of the line with you have questions on this proposed which vessels will ultimately
State Highway 18; then rule, call or email Petty Officer Zachary participate in the Parade of Ships and

VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:58 Apr 05, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\06APP1.SGM 06APP1

14802 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 67 / Friday, April 6, 2018 / Proposed Rules

also provide timely notice in the While some owners or operators of in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
Federal Register. vessels intending to transit the security CONTACT section.
The Coast Guard proposes to amend zone may be small entities, for the
the information required in the notice of E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
reasons stated in section IV.A above,
enforcement to only include the date this proposed rule would not have a The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
and time of the Parade of Ships, and not significant economic impact on any of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
the names of the vessels. In order to vessel owner or operator. Federal agencies to assess the effects of
provide notice to the public regarding If you think that your business, their discretionary regulatory actions. In
the vessels requiring the security zone, organization, or governmental particular, the Act addresses actions
the Coast Guard will provide notice to jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity that may result in the expenditure by a
the public of the designated and that this rule would have a State, local, or tribal government, in the
participating vessels by issuing a significant economic impact on it, aggregate, or by the private sector of
Broadcast Notice to Mariners before and please submit a comment (see $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
during the event. In addition, the ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it more in any one year. Though this
security zone will be enforced with qualifies and how and to what degree proposed rule would not result in such
actual notice during the Seattle Seafair this rule would economically affect it. an expenditure, we do discuss the
Fleet Week each year. The regulatory Under section 213(a) of the Small effects of this rule elsewhere in this
text we are proposing appears at the end Business Regulatory Enforcement preamble.
of this document. Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in F. Environment
IV. Regulatory Analyses understanding this proposed rule. If the We have analyzed this proposed rule
We developed this proposed rule after rule would affect your small business, under Department of Homeland
considering numerous statutes and organization, or governmental Security Directive 023–01, which guides
Executive orders related to rulemaking. jurisdiction and you have questions the Coast Guard in complying with the
Below we summarize our analyses concerning its provisions or options for National Environmental Policy Act of
based on a number of these statutes and compliance, please contact the person 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
Executive orders and we discuss First listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION made a preliminary determination that
Amendment rights of protestors. CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will this action is one of a category of actions
not retaliate against small entities that that do not individually or cumulatively
A. Regulatory Planning and Review have a significant effect on the human
question or complain about this
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 proposed rule or any policy or action of environment. This proposed rule
direct agencies to assess the costs and the Coast Guard. involves amending the way in which
benefits of available regulatory the Coast Guard will notify the public
alternatives and, if regulation is C. Collection of Information which vessels are designated
necessary, to select regulatory This proposed rule would not call for participants in Seattle’s Seafair Fleet
approaches that maximize net benefits. a new collection of information under Week. Normally such actions are
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 categorically excluded from further
to control regulatory costs through a (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). review under paragraph L60(a) of
budgeting process. This NPRM has not Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
been designated a ‘‘significant Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 01. A
Governments
regulatory action,’’ under Executive preliminary Record of Environmental
Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM A rule has implications for federalism Consideration supporting this
has not been reviewed by the Office of under Executive Order 13132, determination is available in the docket
Management and Budget (OMB), and Federalism, if it has a substantial direct where indicated under ADDRESSES. We
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt effect on the States, on the relationship seek any comments or information that
from the requirements of Executive between the national government and may lead to the discovery of a
Order 13771. the States, or on the distribution of significant environmental impact from
This regulatory action determination power and responsibilities among the this proposed rule.
is based on the fact that this rule would various levels of government. We have
only change the mean in which the analyzed this proposed rule under that G. Protest Activities
public will be notified about the Order and have determined that it is The Coast Guard respects the First
security zone. consistent with the fundamental Amendment rights of protesters.
federalism principles and preemption Protesters are asked to contact the
B. Impact on Small Entities requirements described in Executive person listed in the FOR FURTHER
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of Order 13132. INFORMATION CONTACT section to
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, Also, this proposed rule does not have coordinate protest activities so that your
requires Federal agencies to consider tribal implications under Executive message can be received without
the potential impact of regulations on Order 13175, Consultation and jeopardizing the safety or security of
small entities during rulemaking. The Coordination with Indian Tribal people, places, or vessels.
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small Governments, because it would not have
businesses, not-for-profit organizations a substantial direct effect on one or V. Public Participation and Request for
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS

that are independently owned and more Indian tribes, on the relationship Comments
operated and are not dominant in their between the Federal Government and We view public participation as
fields, and governmental jurisdictions Indian tribes, or on the distribution of essential to effective rulemaking, and
with populations of less than 50,000. power and responsibilities between the will consider all comments and material
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. Federal Government and Indian tribes. received during the comment period.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not If you believe this proposed rule has Your comment can help shape the
have a significant economic impact on implications for federalism or Indian outcome of this rulemaking. If you
a substantial number of small entities. tribes, please contact the person listed submit a comment, please include the

VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:58 Apr 05, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\06APP1.SGM 06APP1

Document Created: 2018-11-01 09:15:14
Document Modified: 2018-11-01 09:15:14

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Dates		Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before May 21, 2018.
Contact		If you have questions on this proposed rule, call or email Petty Officer Zachary Spence, Sector Puget Sound Waterways Management Branch, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 206-217-6051, email [email protected]
FR Citation		83 FR 14801
RIN Number		1625-AA87
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (Water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

83 FR 14801 - Security Zone, Seattle's Seafair Fleet Week Moving Vessels, Puget Sound, WA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 67 (April 6, 2018)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard