83 FR 15096 - Special Local Regulation; Chesapeake Bay, between Sandy Point and Kent Island, MD

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 68 (April 9, 2018)

Page Range		15096-15098
FR Document		2018-07196
The Coast Guard proposes to amend its notice of proposed rulemaking and reopen the public comment period for a special local regulation for certain waters of the Chesapeake Bay between Sandy Point, Anne Arundel County, MD and Kent Island, Queen Anne's County, MD, during the Bay Bridge Paddle on June 2, 2018 (rain date of June 3, 2018) published in the Federal Register on January 12, 2018. This proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from being in the regulated area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Maryland-National Capital Region or Coast Guard Patrol Commander.
Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 68 (Monday, April 9, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 68 (Monday, April 9, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 15096-15098]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-07196]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket Number USCG-2017-1054]
RIN 1625-AA08


Special Local Regulation; Chesapeake Bay, between Sandy Point and 
Kent Island, MD

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking; reopening of public 
comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to amend its notice of proposed 
rulemaking and reopen the public comment period for a special local 
regulation for certain waters of the Chesapeake Bay between Sandy 
Point, Anne Arundel County, MD and Kent Island, Queen Anne's County, 
MD, during the Bay Bridge Paddle on June 2, 2018 (rain date of June 3, 
2018) published in the Federal Register on January 12, 2018. This 
proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from being in 
the regulated area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port 
Maryland-National Capital Region or Coast Guard Patrol Commander.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast 
Guard on or before May 9, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2017-1054 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for 
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further 
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this 
proposed rulemaking, call or email Mr. Ronald Houck, U.S. Coast Guard 
Sector Maryland-National Capital Region; telephone 410-576-2674, email 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
SNPRM Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    The Coast Guard published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on 
January 12, 2018 (83 FR 1597), proposing to establish a special local 
regulation for the Bay Bridge Paddle, on June 2, 2018 (rain date of 
June 3, 2018). The comment period closed February 12, 2018. The Coast 
Guard received one comment on the original request for comments.
    Subsequent to the Coast Guard publishing the notice of proposed 
rulemaking, ABC Events, Inc., notified the Coast Guard that as a result 
of a meeting with the bridge authority a change of the elite paddler 
race course location is necessary. We are issuing this supplemental 
proposal to amend the proposed special local regulation to increase the 
size of the paddle race area, and reopen the comment period to account 
for this change. The Coast Guard will accept and review any comments 
received between the close of the comment period and the publication of 
this supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking.
    The purpose of this rulemaking is to protect event participants, 
spectators and transiting vessels on certain waters of the Chesapeake 
Bay before, during, and after the scheduled event. The Coast Guard 
proposes this rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1233, which 
authorizes the Coast Guard to establish and define special local 
regulations.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    This proposed rule would create a temporary special local 
regulation on certain waters of the Chesapeake Bay for the Bay Bridge 
Paddle. This special local regulation would expand the proposed 
regulated area northward of the north bridge (westbound span) of the 
William P. Lane, Jr. (US-50/301) Memorial Bridges from that area 
described in the original published notice of proposed rulemaking. 
Bridge rehabilitation work along the eastern portion of the north 
bridge (westbound span) of the William P. Lane, Jr. (US-50/301) 
Memorial Bridges includes the placement of barges and other marine 
equipment in the waterway. Allowing the proposed paddling event to 
proceed along its original race course would adversely affect both the 
bridge work activities and event participants. The expanded area allows 
the event planner an alternative to mitigate the risk posed to event 
participants by altering the race course northward of that area.
    The revised proposed regulated area would cover all navigable 
waters of the Chesapeake Bay, adjacent to the

[[Page 15097]]

shoreline at Sandy Point State Park and between and adjacent to the 
spans of the William P. Lane Jr. Memorial Bridges, from shoreline to 
shoreline, bounded to the north by a line drawn from the western 
shoreline at latitude 39[deg]01'05.23'' N, longitude 076[deg]23'47.93'' 
W; thence eastward to latitude 39[deg]01'02.08'' N, longitude 
076[deg]22'40.24'' W; thence southeastward to eastern shoreline at 
latitude 38[deg]59'13.70'' N, longitude 076[deg]19'58.40'' W; and 
bounded to the south by a line drawn parallel and 500 yards south of 
the south bridge span that originates from the western shoreline at 
latitude 39[deg]00'17.08'' N, longitude 076[deg]24'28.36'' W; thence 
southward to latitude 38[deg]59'38.36'' N, longitude 076[deg]23'59.67'' 
W; thence eastward to latitude 38[deg]59'26.93'' N, longitude 
076[deg]23'25.53'' W; thence eastward to the eastern shoreline at 
latitude 38[deg]58'40.32'' N, longitude 076[deg]20'10.45'' W, located 
between Sandy Point and Kent Island, MD. The duration of the regulated 
area is intended to ensure the safety of vessels and these navigable 
waters before, during, and after the scheduled 8 a.m. until 12:30 p.m. 
paddle race event.
    All other regulatory provisions in the original proposed rulemaking 
remain the same. The regulatory text we are proposing appears at the 
end of this document.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes 
and Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our 
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and 
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control 
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This SNPRM has not been 
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 
12866. Accordingly, the SNPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt 
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size and 
duration of the regulated area, which would impact a small designated 
area of the Chesapeake Bay for six hours. The Coast Guard would issue a 
Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the 
status of the regulated area. Moreover, the rule would allow vessels to 
seek permission to enter the regulated area, and vessel traffic would 
be able to safely transit the regulated area once the COTP Coast Guard 
Patrol Commander deems it safe to do so.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this 
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
regulated area may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
IV.A above this proposed rule would not have a significant economic 
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what 
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect 
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you 
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that 
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action 
of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of 
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and 
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under 
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or 
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not 
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule 
elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland 
Security Directive 023-01, which guides the Coast Guard in complying 
with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-
4370f), and have made a preliminary determination that this action is 
one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively 
have a significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule 
involves implementation of a temporary special local regulation lasting 
for 6 hours. The category of water activities includes but is not 
limited to sail boat regattas, boat parades, power boat racing, 
swimming events, crew racing, canoe and sail board racing. Normally 
such actions are categorically excluded from further review under 
paragraph L[61] of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-
01-001-01, Rev. 01. A preliminary Record of

[[Page 15098]]

Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available 
in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or 
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant 
environmental impact from this proposed rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places, or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking, 
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment 
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If 
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this 
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which 
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or 
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be 
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate 
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted 
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any 
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the 
docket, visit http://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
    Documents mentioned in this SNPRM as being available in the docket, 
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's 
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up 
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a 
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100

    Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes 
to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:

PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS

0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; 33 CFR 1.05-1.

0
2. Add Sec.  100.501T05-1054 to read as follows:


Sec.  100.501T05-1054   Special Local Regulation; Chesapeake Bay, 
between Sandy Point and Kent Island, MD.

    (a) Regulated area. The following location is a regulated area: All 
navigable waters of the Chesapeake Bay, adjacent to the shoreline at 
Sandy Point State Park and between and adjacent to the spans of the 
William P. Lane Jr. Memorial Bridges, from shoreline to shoreline, 
bounded to the north by a line drawn from the western shoreline at 
latitude 39[deg]01'05.23'' N, longitude 076[deg]23'47.93'' W; thence 
eastward to latitude 39[deg]01'02.08'' N, longitude 076[deg]22'40.24'' 
W; thence southeastward to eastern shoreline at latitude 
38[deg]59'13.70'' N, longitude 076[deg]19'58.40'' W; and bounded to the 
south by a line drawn parallel and 500 yards south of the south bridge 
span that originates from the western shoreline at latitude 
39[deg]00'17.08'' N, longitude 076[deg]24'28.36'' W; thence southward 
to latitude 38[deg]59'38.36'' N, longitude 076[deg]23'59.67'' W; thence 
eastward to latitude 38[deg]59'26.93'' N, longitude 076[deg]23'25.53'' 
W; thence eastward to the eastern shoreline at latitude 
38[deg]58'40.32'' N, longitude 076[deg]20'10.45'' W, located between 
Sandy Point and Kent Island, MD. All coordinates reference North 
American Datum 83 (NAD 1983).
    (b) Definitions. (1) Captain of the Port (COTP) Maryland-National 
Capital Region means the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Maryland-
National Capital Region or any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or 
petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the Port to act 
on his behalf.
    (2) Coast Guard Patrol Commander means a commissioned, warrant, or 
petty officer of the U.S. Coast Guard who has been designated by the 
Commander, Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region.
    (3) Official Patrol means any vessel assigned or approved by 
Commander, Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region with a 
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer on board and displaying a Coast 
Guard ensign.
    (4) Participant means all persons and vessels participating in the 
Bay Bridge Paddle event under the auspices of the Marine Event Permit 
issued to the event sponsor and approved by Commander, Coast Guard 
Sector Maryland-National Capital Region.
    (c) Special local regulations: (1) The COTP or Coast Guard Patrol 
Commander may forbid and control the movement of all vessels and 
persons, including event participants, in the regulated area. When 
hailed or signaled by an official patrol, a vessel or person in the 
regulated area shall immediately comply with the directions given. 
Failure to do so may result in expulsion from the area, citation for 
failure to comply, or both. The Coast Guard Patrol Commander may 
terminate the event, or the operation of any support vessel 
participating in the event, at any time it is deemed necessary for the 
protection of life or property.
    (2) Except for participants and vessels already at berth, all 
persons and vessels within the regulated area at the time it is 
implemented are to depart the regulated area.
    (3) Persons and vessels desiring to transit, moor, or anchor within 
the regulated area must first obtain authorization from the COTP 
Maryland-National Capital Region or Coast Guard Patrol Commander. Prior 
to the enforcement period, vessels or persons seeking permission to 
transit, moor, or anchor within the area may contact the COTP Maryland-
National Capital Region at telephone number 410-576-2693 or on Marine 
Band Radio, VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). During the enforcement 
period, vessels or persons seeking permission to transit, moor, or 
anchor within the area may contact the Coast Guard Patrol Commander on 
Marine Band Radio, VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz) for direction.
    (4) The Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol and enforcement 
of the regulated area by other Federal, State, and local agencies. The 
Coast Guard Patrol Commander and official patrol vessels enforcing this 
regulated area can be contacted on marine band radio VHF-FM channel 16 
(156.8 MHz) and channel 22A (157.1 MHz).
    (5) The Coast Guard will publish a notice in the Fifth Coast Guard 
District Local Notice to Mariners and issue a marine information 
broadcast on VHF-FM marine band radio announcing specific event date 
and times.
    (d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 7 a.m. 
to 1:30 p.m. on June 2, 2018, and, if necessary due to inclement 
weather, from 7 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. on June 3, 2018.

    Dated: April 4, 2018.
Lonnie P. Harrison, Jr.,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Maryland-National 
Capital Region.
[FR Doc. 2018-07196 Filed 4-6-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 68 / Monday, April 9, 2018 / Proposed Rules 15097

shoreline at Sandy Point State Park and would issue a Broadcast Notice to Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
between and adjacent to the spans of the Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel effect on the States, on the relationship
William P. Lane Jr. Memorial Bridges, 16 about the status of the regulated area. between the national government and
from shoreline to shoreline, bounded to Moreover, the rule would allow vessels the States, or on the distribution of
the north by a line drawn from the to seek permission to enter the regulated power and responsibilities among the
western shoreline at latitude area, and vessel traffic would be able to various levels of government. We have
39°01′05.23″ N, longitude 076°23′47.93″ safely transit the regulated area once the analyzed this proposed rule under that
W; thence eastward to latitude COTP Coast Guard Patrol Commander Order and have determined that it is
39°01′02.08″ N, longitude 076°22′40.24″ deems it safe to do so. consistent with the fundamental
W; thence southeastward to eastern federalism principles and preemption
shoreline at latitude 38°59′13.70″ N, B. Impact on Small Entities requirements described in Executive
longitude 076°19′58.40″ W; and The Regulatory Flexibility Act of Order 13132.
bounded to the south by a line drawn 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, Also, this proposed rule does not have
parallel and 500 yards south of the requires Federal agencies to consider tribal implications under Executive
south bridge span that originates from the potential impact of regulations on Order 13175, Consultation and
the western shoreline at latitude small entities during rulemaking. The Coordination with Indian Tribal
39°00′17.08″ N, longitude 076°24′28.36″ term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small Governments, because it would not have
W; thence southward to latitude businesses, not-for-profit organizations a substantial direct effect on one or
38°59′38.36″ N, longitude 076°23′59.67″ that are independently owned and more Indian tribes, on the relationship
W; thence eastward to latitude operated and are not dominant in their between the Federal Government and
38°59′26.93″ N, longitude 076°23′25.53″ fields, and governmental jurisdictions Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
W; thence eastward to the eastern with populations of less than 50,000. power and responsibilities between the
shoreline at latitude 38°58′40.32″ N, The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. Federal Government and Indian tribes.
longitude 076°20′10.45″ W, located 605(b) that this proposed rule would not If you believe this proposed rule has
between Sandy Point and Kent Island, have a significant economic impact on implications for federalism or Indian
MD. The duration of the regulated area a substantial number of small entities. tribes, please contact the person listed
is intended to ensure the safety of While some owners or operators of in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
vessels and these navigable waters vessels intending to transit the regulated CONTACT section.
before, during, and after the scheduled area may be small entities, for the E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
8 a.m. until 12:30 p.m. paddle race reasons stated in section IV.A above this
event. proposed rule would not have a The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
All other regulatory provisions in the significant economic impact on any of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
original proposed rulemaking remain vessel owner or operator. Federal agencies to assess the effects of
the same. The regulatory text we are If you think that your business, their discretionary regulatory actions. In
proposing appears at the end of this organization, or governmental particular, the Act addresses actions
document. jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity that may result in the expenditure by a
and that this rule would have a State, local, or tribal government, in the
IV. Regulatory Analyses aggregate, or by the private sector of
significant economic impact on it,
We developed this proposed rule after please submit a comment (see $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
considering numerous statutes and ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it more in any one year. Though this
Executive Orders related to rulemaking. qualifies and how and to what degree proposed rule would not result in such
Below we summarize our analyses this rule would economically affect it. an expenditure, we do discuss the
based on a number of these statutes and Under section 213(a) of the Small effects of this rule elsewhere in this
Executive orders and we discuss First Business Regulatory Enforcement preamble.
Amendment rights of protestors. Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104– F. Environment
A. Regulatory Planning and Review 121), we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the We have analyzed this proposed rule
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 rule would affect your small business, under Department of Homeland
direct agencies to assess the costs and organization, or governmental Security Directive 023–01, which guides
benefits of available regulatory jurisdiction and you have questions the Coast Guard in complying with the
alternatives and, if regulation is concerning its provisions or options for National Environmental Policy Act of
necessary, to select regulatory compliance, please contact the person 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
approaches that maximize net benefits. listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION made a preliminary determination that
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will this action is one of a category of actions
to control regulatory costs through a not retaliate against small entities that that do not individually or cumulatively
budgeting process. This SNPRM has not question or complain about this have a significant effect on the human
been designated a ‘‘significant proposed rule or any policy or action of environment. This proposed rule
regulatory action,’’ under Executive the Coast Guard. involves implementation of a temporary
Order 12866. Accordingly, the SNPRM special local regulation lasting for 6
has not been reviewed by the Office of C. Collection of Information hours. The category of water activities
Management and Budget (OMB), and includes but is not limited to sail boat
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS

This proposed rule would not call for
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt a new collection of information under regattas, boat parades, power boat
from the requirements of Executive the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 racing, swimming events, crew racing,
Order 13771. (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). canoe and sail board racing. Normally
This regulatory action determination such actions are categorically excluded
is based on the size and duration of the D. Federalism and Indian Tribal from further review under paragraph
regulated area, which would impact a Governments L[61] of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
small designated area of the Chesapeake A rule has implications for federalism Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01,
Bay for six hours. The Coast Guard under Executive Order 13132, Rev. 01. A preliminary Record of

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:17 Apr 06, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\09APP1.SGM 09APP1
Document Created: 2018-04-07 02:39:00
Document Modified: 2018-04-07 02:39:00
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking; reopening of public comment period.
Dates		Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before May 9, 2018.
Contact		If you have questions about this proposed rulemaking, call or email Mr. Ronald Houck, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region; telephone 410-576-2674, email [email protected]
FR Citation		83 FR 15096
RIN Number		1625-AA08
CFR Associated		Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Waterways
83 FR 15096 - Special Local Regulation; Chesapeake Bay, between Sandy Point and Kent Island, MD

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 68 (April 9, 2018)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
