83 FR 15524 - Addition to the National Network

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 70 (April 11, 2018)

Page Range		15524-15526
FR Document		2018-07480

The FHWA is proposing to approve the addition of Sheridan Boulevard (NY 895) to the National Network (NN) and to revise its regulations to reflect the addition. The facility currently known as ``Interstate-895 Sheridan Expressway'' in New York City, located in Bronx County, will be reconstructed, removed from the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways (Interstate System) to accommodate new design features, and classified as an ``Urban Principal Arterial-- Other.'' This facility will be identified as the ``Sheridan Boulevard (NY 895).''

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 70 (Wednesday, April 11, 2018)

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 11, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 15524-15526]
From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-07480]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration

23 CFR Part 658

[FHWA Docket No. FHWA-2018-0016]
RIN 2125-AF82

Addition to the National Network

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FHWA is proposing to approve the addition of Sheridan
Boulevard (NY 895) to the National Network (NN) and to revise its
regulations to reflect the addition. The facility currently known as
``Interstate-895 Sheridan Expressway'' in New York City, located in
Bronx County, will be reconstructed, removed from the National System
of Interstate and Defense Highways (Interstate System) to accommodate
new design features, and classified as an ``Urban Principal Arterial--
Other.'' This facility will be identified as the ``Sheridan Boulevard
(NY 895).''

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 23, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Mail or hand deliver comments to Docket Management Facility:
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590, submit comments electronically at http://www.regulations.gov.
All comments should include the docket number that appears in the
heading of this document. All comments received will be available for
examination and copying at the above address from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.,
e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Those desiring
notifications of receipt of comments must include a self-addressed,
stamped postcard or may print the acknowledgment page that appears
after submitting comments electronically. Anyone can search the
electronic form of all comments in any one of our dockets by the name
of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association, business, or labor union). You
may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000, (Volume 65, Number 70, Pages 19477-78) or
you may visit http://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical information, contact Ms.
Crystal Jones, FHWA Office of Freight Management and Operations, (202)
366-2976. For legal information, contact Mr. William Winne, Office of
Chief Counsel, (202) 366-1397. Federal Highway Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. Office hours are from 7:45 a.m.
to 4:15 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic Access and Filing

You may submit or retrieve comments online through the Federal
eRulemaking portal at www.regulations.gov. It is available 24 hours
each day, 365 days each year. Please follow the instructions online for
more information and help.
An electronic copy of this document may also be downloaded by
accessing the Office of the Federal Register's home page at: http://www.archives.gov and the Government Publishing Office's web page at:
http://www.access.thefederalregister.org/nara.

Background

The NN consists of Interstate System routes (except exempted
routes) and those non-Interstate System routes added through the
rulemaking process. See 49 U.S.C. 31111(e)-(f) and 31113(e); 23 CFR 658
Appendix A; see also 49 FR 23302 (June 5, 1984). To ensure that the NN
remains substantially intact, FHWA retains the authority to rule upon
all requests for additions to and deletions from the NN as well as
requests for the imposition of certain restrictions. Pursuant to 23 CFR
658.11, requests for additions to the NN must be submitted in writing
to the appropriate FHWA Division Office and endorsed by the Governor or
the Governor's authorized representative. Proposals for addition of
routes to the NN must also be accompanied by an analysis of suitability
based on the criteria in 23 CFR 658.9. Once a non-Interstate System
route is added to the NN, it is included in Appendix A of 23 CFR part
658--National Network--Federally Designated Routes.
On November 10, 2017, FHWA received a request from the New York
State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) proposing a modification to
the Interstate System. The request, available in the rulemaking docket,
proposes the de-designation (removal from the Interstate System) of the
Sheridan Expressway (I-895), approximately a 1.3-mile Interstate
between the Bruckner Expressway (I-278) and the Cross Bronx Expressway
(I-95). As part of the de-designation, the State also proposes the
functional reclassification of this highway segment from an Interstate
to ``Urban Principal Arterial--Other'' and to rename the road Sheridan
Boulevard (NY-895). The physical alignment of the highway would be
maintained and it would therefore continue to provide the same access
for commercial vehicles as currently exists. The FHWA intends to act on
this request pursuant to its regulatory authority on revisions to the
Interstate System (23 CFR 470.115(a) and 23 CFR 658.11(d)) and guidance
on Interstate System de-designations (https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/national_highway_system/interstate_highway_system/withdrawalqa.cfm).
The NYSDOT intends to keep Sheridan Boulevard (NY-895) in the NN.
Because the route would no longer be in the Interstate System, it must
be added to NN as a non-Interstate System route and be listed in 23 CFR
658 Appendix A. The NYSDOT proposal included the required analysis of
suitability based on the criteria in 23 CFR 658.9, which includes a
crash

[[Page 15525]]

analysis and safety study, and also documents effects on Interstate
commerce, effects on alternate routes, effects on traffic operations,
and consultation with local governments.
The FHWA reviewed NYSDOT's proposal and affirms that the request to
add a route to the NN is consistent with 23 CFR 658.9 and 658.11 with
respect to the criteria for the NN and the procedures for additions to
the NN. In this Notice of Proposal Rulemaking, FHWA is proposing to
approve the addition of Sheridan Boulevard (NY 895) to the NN and to
revise existing regulations (23 CFR 658 Appendix A) to reflect the
addition.

Rulemaking Analyses and Notices

As the Sheridan Expressway is already part of the NN due to its
Interstate designation, FHWA has determined there would be no
substantive impact to the public resulting from the addition of the
reconstructed facility, Sheridan Boulevard, to the NN.

Executive Order 13771 (Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs), Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review),
Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review), and
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). The FHWA
has determined preliminarily that this action is not a significant
regulatory action within the meaning of Executive Order 12866 and is
not significant within the meaning of DOT regulatory policies and
procedures. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules,
and promoting flexibility. It is anticipated that the economic impact
of this rulemaking would be minimal. These changes would not adversely
affect, in a material way, any sector of the economy. In addition,
these changes would not interfere with any action taken or planned by
another agency and would not materially alter the budgetary impact of
any entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs. Consequently, a
full regulatory evaluation is not required. Finally, this proposed rule
is not an E.O. 13771 regulatory action because it is not significant
under E.O. 12866.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

In compliance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96-354,
5 U.S.C. 60l-612) the FHWA has evaluated the effects of this action on
small entities and has determined that the action would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
``Small entities'' include small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with
populations under 50,000. This action does not affect any funding
distributed under any of the programs administered by FHWA. For these
reasons, FHWA certifies that this action would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

This rule would not impose unfunded mandates as defined by the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4, 109 Stat. 48).
This proposed rule would not result in the expenditure by State, local,
and Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$148.1 million or more in any one year (2 U.S.C. 1532). Further, in
compliance with the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, the agencies
will evaluate any regulatory action that might be proposed in
subsequent stages of the proceeding to assess the effects on State,
local, and Tribal governments and the private sector.

Executive Order 13132 (Federalism Assessment)

This action has been analyzed in accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order 13132, and FHWA has determined
that this action would not have sufficient federalism implications to
warrant the preparation of a federalism assessment. The FHWA has also
determined that this action would not preempt any State law or State
regulation or affect the States' ability to discharge traditional State
governmental functions.

Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)

We have analyzed this action under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use, dated May 18, 2001. We have determined that it is
not a significant energy action under that order since it is not likely
to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or
use of energy. Therefore, a Statement of Energy Effects is not
required.

Executive Order 12372 (Intergovernmental Review)

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205,
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this program.

Paperwork Reduction Act

Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501),
Federal agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and
Budget for each collection of information they conduct, sponsor, or
require through regulations. The FHWA has determined that this rule
does not contain collection of information requirements for the
purposes of the PRA.

Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)

This action meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Executive Order 13045 (Protection of Children)

The FHWA has analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. The FHWA certifies that this action would not cause any
environmental risk to health or safety that might disproportionately
affect children.

Executive Order 12630 (Taking of Private Property)

The FHWA has analyzed this rule under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interface with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights. The FHWA does not anticipate that this action would
affect a taking of private property or otherwise have taking
implications under Executive Order 12630.

National Environmental Policy Act

The Agency has analyzed this action for the purpose of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4347) and has
determined that this action would not have any effect on the quality of
the environment.

[[Page 15526]]

Regulation Identification Number

A regulation identification number (RIN) is assigned to each
regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations.
The Regulatory Information Service Center publishes the Unified Agenda
in April and October of each year. The RIN contained in the heading of
this document can be used to cross reference this action with the
Unified Agenda.

List of Subjects in 23 CFR Part 658

Grants Program--transportation, Highways and roads, Motor carriers.

Issued on: April 6, 2018.
Brandye L. Hendrickson,
Acting Administrator, Federal Highway Administration.

In consideration of the foregoing, the FHWA proposes to amend 23
CFR part 658, as set forth below:

PART 658--TRUCK SIZE AND WEIGHT, ROUTE DESIGNATIONS--LENGTH, WIDTH
AND WEIGHT LIMITATIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 658 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 23 U.S.C. 127 and 315; 49 U.S.C. 31111, 31112, and
31114; sec. 347, Pub. L. 108-7, 117 Stat. 419; sec. 756, Pub. L.
109-59, 119 Stat. 1219; sec. 115, Pub. L. 109-115, 119 Stat. 2408;
49 CFR 1.48(b)(19) and (c)(19).

0
2. Amend Appendix A to Part 658 by adding an entry to the New York
portion of the table:

Appendix A to Part 658--National Network--Federally--Designated Routes

* * * * *

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Route From To
------------------------------------------------------------------------
New York
------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * * * *
Sheridan Boulevard (NY 895). I-278 Bruckner I-95 Cross Bronx
Expressway. Expressway.

* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2018-07480 Filed 4-10-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules 15525

analysis and safety study, and also because it is not significant under E.O. distribution, or use of energy. Therefore,
documents effects on Interstate 12866. a Statement of Energy Effects is not
commerce, effects on alternate routes, required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
effects on traffic operations, and
In compliance with the Regulatory Executive Order 12372
consultation with local governments.
The FHWA reviewed NYSDOT’s Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96–354, 5 U.S.C. (Intergovernmental Review)
proposal and affirms that the request to 60l-612) the FHWA has evaluated the Catalog of Federal Domestic
add a route to the NN is consistent with effects of this action on small entities Assistance Program Number 20.205,
23 CFR 658.9 and 658.11 with respect and has determined that the action Highway Planning and Construction.
to the criteria for the NN and the would not have a significant economic The regulations implementing Executive
procedures for additions to the NN. In impact on a substantial number of small Order 12372 regarding
this Notice of Proposal Rulemaking, entities. ‘‘Small entities’’ include small intergovernmental consultation on
FHWA is proposing to approve the businesses, not-for-profit organizations Federal programs and activities apply to
addition of Sheridan Boulevard (NY that are independently owned and this program.
895) to the NN and to revise existing operated and are not dominant in their
regulations (23 CFR 658 Appendix A) to fields, and governmental jurisdictions Paperwork Reduction Act
reflect the addition. with populations under 50,000. This
action does not affect any funding Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
Rulemaking Analyses and Notices of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501), Federal
distributed under any of the programs
As the Sheridan Expressway is administered by FHWA. For these agencies must obtain approval from the
already part of the NN due to its reasons, FHWA certifies that this action Office of Management and Budget for
Interstate designation, FHWA has would not have a significant economic each collection of information they
determined there would be no impact on a substantial number of small conduct, sponsor, or require through
substantive impact to the public entities. regulations. The FHWA has determined
resulting from the addition of the that this rule does not contain collection
reconstructed facility, Sheridan Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of of information requirements for the
Boulevard, to the NN. 1995 purposes of the PRA.
Executive Order 13771 (Reducing This rule would not impose unfunded Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory mandates as defined by the Unfunded Reform)
Costs), Executive Order 12866 Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
(Regulatory Planning and Review), 104–4, 109 Stat. 48). This proposed rule This action meets applicable
Executive Order 13563 (Improving would not result in the expenditure by standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Regulation and Regulatory Review), State, local, and Tribal governments, in Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
and DOT Regulatory Policies and the aggregate, or by the private sector, of Reform, to minimize litigation,
Procedures $148.1 million or more in any one year eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
(2 U.S.C. 1532). Further, in compliance burden.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 with the Unfunded Mandates Reform
direct agencies to assess all costs and Executive Order 13045 (Protection of
Act of 1995, the agencies will evaluate
benefits of available regulatory Children)
any regulatory action that might be
alternatives and, if regulation is proposed in subsequent stages of the
necessary, to select regulatory The FHWA has analyzed this rule
proceeding to assess the effects on State, under Executive Order 13045,
approaches that maximize net benefits local, and Tribal governments and the
(including potential economic, Protection of Children from
private sector. Environmental Health Risks and Safety
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and Executive Order 13132 (Federalism Risks. The FHWA certifies that this
equity). The FHWA has determined Assessment) action would not cause any
preliminarily that this action is not a environmental risk to health or safety
This action has been analyzed in that might disproportionately affect
significant regulatory action within the accordance with the principles and
meaning of Executive Order 12866 and children.
criteria contained in Executive Order
is not significant within the meaning of 13132, and FHWA has determined that Executive Order 12630 (Taking of
DOT regulatory policies and procedures. this action would not have sufficient Private Property)
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the federalism implications to warrant the
importance of quantifying both costs preparation of a federalism assessment. The FHWA has analyzed this rule
and benefits, reducing costs, The FHWA has also determined that under Executive Order 12630,
harmonizing rules, and promoting this action would not preempt any State Governmental Actions and Interface
flexibility. It is anticipated that the law or State regulation or affect the with Constitutionally Protected Property
economic impact of this rulemaking States’ ability to discharge traditional Rights. The FHWA does not anticipate
would be minimal. These changes State governmental functions. that this action would affect a taking of
would not adversely affect, in a material private property or otherwise have
way, any sector of the economy. In Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects) taking implications under Executive
addition, these changes would not We have analyzed this action under Order 12630.
nshattuck on DSK9F9SC42PROD with PROPOSALS

interfere with any action taken or Executive Order 13211, Actions National Environmental Policy Act
planned by another agency and would Concerning Regulations That
not materially alter the budgetary Significantly Affect Energy Supply, The Agency has analyzed this action
impact of any entitlements, grants, user Distribution, or Use, dated May 18, for the purpose of the National
fees, or loan programs. Consequently, a 2001. We have determined that it is not Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
full regulatory evaluation is not a significant energy action under that U.S.C. 4321–4347) and has determined
required. Finally, this proposed rule is order since it is not likely to have a that this action would not have any
not an E.O. 13771 regulatory action significant adverse effect on the supply, effect on the quality of the environment.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:52 Apr 10, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM 11APP1

15526 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 70 / Wednesday, April 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules

Regulation Identification Number Issued on: April 6, 2018. Authority: 23 U.S.C. 127 and 315; 49
Brandye L. Hendrickson, U.S.C. 31111, 31112, and 31114; sec. 347,
A regulation identification number
Pub. L. 108–7, 117 Stat. 419; sec. 756, Pub.
(RIN) is assigned to each regulatory Acting Administrator, Federal Highway
Administration. L. 109–59, 119 Stat. 1219; sec. 115, Pub. L.
action listed in the Unified Agenda of
109–115, 119 Stat. 2408; 49 CFR 1.48(b)(19)
Federal Regulations. The Regulatory
In consideration of the foregoing, the and (c)(19).
Information Service Center publishes
the Unified Agenda in April and FHWA proposes to amend 23 CFR part
658, as set forth below: ■ 2. Amend Appendix A to Part 658 by
October of each year. The RIN contained adding an entry to the New York portion
in the heading of this document can be of the table:
used to cross reference this action with PART 658—TRUCK SIZE AND WEIGHT,
the Unified Agenda. ROUTE DESIGNATIONS—LENGTH, Appendix A to Part 658—National
WIDTH AND WEIGHT LIMITATIONS Network—Federally—Designated
List of Subjects in 23 CFR Part 658
Routes
Grants Program—transportation, ■ 1. The authority citation for part 658
Highways and roads, Motor carriers. continues to read as follows: * * * * *

Route From To

New York

* * * * * * *
Sheridan Boulevard (NY 895) ........................... I–278 Bruckner Expressway ............................. I–95 Cross Bronx Expressway.

* * * * * * *

[FR Doc. 2018–07480 Filed 4–10–18; 8:45 am] by the remaining pending permit submissions, and general guidance on
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P approvals. This revision will not impact making effective comments, please visit
the schedule for installation and https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
operation of control equipment, will not commenting-epa-dockets.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION alter any other compliance dates, and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
AGENCY will not adversely affect air quality in Heather Hamilton, Environmental
Muscatine, Iowa, as explained in the Protection Agency, Air Planning and
40 CFR Part 52 revised Technical Support Document Development Branch, 11201 Renner
that is part of this docket. Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at
[EPA–R07–OAR–2017–0143; FRL–9976–50–
Region 7]
This proposal will also address (913) 551–7039, or by email at
adverse comments submitted to the hamilton.heather@epa.gov.
Air Plan Approval; Iowa; Amendment docket. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
to the Administrative Consent Order, DATES: Comments must be received on Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
Grain Processing Corporation, or before May 11, 2018. and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. This section
Muscatine, Iowa; Proposal provides additional information by
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
addressing the following:
AGENCY: Environmental Protection identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
Agency (EPA). OAR–2017–0143 to https:// I. Background
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online II. What is being addressed in this document?
ACTION: Proposed rule. III. Have the requirements for approval of a
instructions for submitting comments.
SIP revision been met?
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Once submitted, comments cannot be IV. EPA’s Response to Comment
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve edited or removed from Regulations.gov. V. What action is EPA taking?
revisions to the State Implementation The EPA may publish any comment VI. Incorporation by Reference
Plan (SIP) for the State of Iowa to received to its public docket. Do not VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
incorporate an amendment to the submit electronically any information
Administrative Consent Order (ACO) for you consider to be Confidential I. Background
Grain Processing Corporation (GPC), Business Information (CBI) or other On August 25, 2017, EPA proposed to
Muscatine, Iowa. The revision amends information whose disclosure is approve a revision to the Iowa State
the ACO to change the date for restricted by statute. Multimedia Implementation Plan (SIP) which
completion of performance testing from submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be amended the Administrative Consent
May 31, 2017, to May 31, 2018, to allow accompanied by a written comment. Order (ACO) for Grain Processing
the state more time to complete the The written comment is considered the Corporation (GPC), Muscatine, Iowa.
remaining air construction permit official comment and should include The revision amended the ACO to
applications submitted by GPC, and to discussion of all points you wish to change the date for completion of
nshattuck on DSK9F9SC42PROD with PROPOSALS

specify testing requirements as make. The EPA will generally not performance testing from May 31, 2017,
appropriate in the final permits. When consider comments or comment to May 31, 2018, to allow the state more
the state submitted the request to amend contents located outside of the primary time to complete processing the
the ACO, twelve of the 107 permits were submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or remaining air construction permit
incomplete. At this time, only two other file sharing system). For applications submitted by GPC, and to
permits have not been issued by the additional submission methods, the full specify testing requirements as
State. The air quality in Muscatine, EPA public comment policy, appropriate in the remaining final
Iowa, has not been adversely impacted information about CBI or multimedia permits. See 82 FR 40519. In

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:52 Apr 10, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\11APP1.SGM 11APP1

Document Created: 2018-04-10 23:59:41
Document Modified: 2018-04-10 23:59:41

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Dates		Comments must be received on or before April 23, 2018.
Contact		For technical information, contact Ms. Crystal Jones, FHWA Office of Freight Management and Operations, (202) 366-2976. For legal information, contact Mr. William Winne, Office of Chief Counsel, (202) 366-1397. Federal Highway Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. Office hours are from 7:45 a.m. to 4:15 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FR Citation		83 FR 15524
RIN Number		2125-AF82
CFR Associated		Grants Program-Transportation; Highways and Roads and Motor Carriers

83 FR 15524 - Addition to the National Network

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONFederal Highway Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 70 (April 11, 2018)

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration