83_FR_15827 83 FR 15756 - Branding Requirements for Bovines Imported Into the United States From Mexico

83 FR 15756 - Branding Requirements for Bovines Imported Into the United States From Mexico

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 71 (April 12, 2018)

Page Range15756-15758
FR Document2018-07585

We are proposing to amend the regulations regarding the branding of bovines imported into the United States from Mexico. We are taking this action at the request of the Government of Mexico to address issues that have arisen with the branding requirement for these bovines. The changes we are proposing would help prevent inconsistencies in branding that can result in bovines being rejected for import into the United States.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 71 (Thursday, April 12, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 71 (Thursday, April 12, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 15756-15758]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-07585]


========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 71 / Thursday, April 12, 2018 / 
Proposed Rules

[[Page 15756]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

9 CFR Part 93

[Docket No. APHIS-2016-0050]
RIN 0579-AE38


Branding Requirements for Bovines Imported Into the United States 
From Mexico

AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are proposing to amend the regulations regarding the 
branding of bovines imported into the United States from Mexico. We are 
taking this action at the request of the Government of Mexico to 
address issues that have arisen with the branding requirement for these 
bovines. The changes we are proposing would help prevent 
inconsistencies in branding that can result in bovines being rejected 
for import into the United States.

DATES: We will consider all comments that we receive on or before June 
11, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2016-0050.
     Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Send your comment to 
Docket No. APHIS-2016-0050, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD, 
APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-
1238.
    Supporting documents and any comments we receive on this docket may 
be viewed at http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2016-
0050 or in our reading room, which is located in room 1141 of the USDA 
South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC. 
Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you, 
please call (202) 799-7039 before coming.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Betzaida Lopez, Senior Staff 
Veterinarian, National Import Export Services, Policy, Permitting, and 
Regulatory Services, VS, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 39, Riverdale, MD 
20737-1231; (301) 851-3300.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The regulations in 9 CFR part 93 prohibit or restrict the 
importation of certain animals, birds, and poultry into the United 
States to prevent the introduction of communicable diseases of 
livestock and poultry. Subpart D of part 93 (Sec. Sec.  93.400 through 
93.436, referred to below as the regulations) governs the importation 
of ruminants; within subpart D, Sec.  93.427 specifically addresses the 
importation of cattle and other bovines from Mexico into the United 
States.
    In Sec.  93.427, paragraph (c) contains conditions to prevent the 
spread of tuberculosis to U.S. livestock and paragraph (e) contains 
conditions to prevent the entry of bovine spongiform encephalopathy 
(BSE) via the importation of cattle and other bovines from Mexico. 
Under paragraph (c)(1), steers imported into the United States must be 
identified with a distinct, permanent, and legible ``M'' mark, and 
spayed heifers must be identified with a distinct, permanent, and 
legible ``MX'' mark, applied with a freeze brand, hot iron, 
or other method prior to arrival at a port of entry. The brands must 
not be less than 2 inches or more than 3 inches high, and must be 
applied to the animal's right hip, high on the tailhead (over the 
junction of the sacral and first coccygeal vertebrae).
    Under paragraph (e)(3), sexually intact bovines must be permanently 
and humanely identified using one of the following methods:
     An ``MX'' mark applied with a freeze brand, hot iron, or 
other method prior to arrival at a port of entry. The brand must not be 
less than 2 inches or more than 3 inches high, and must be applied to 
the animal's right hip, high on the tailhead (over the junction of the 
sacral and first coccygeal vertebrae);
     A tattoo with the letters MX applied to the inside of one 
ear of the animal; or
     Other means of permanent identification upon request if 
deemed adequate by the Administrator to humanely identify the animal in 
a distinct and legible way as having been imported from Mexico.
    Several issues have arisen as a result of the branding 
requirements. The small size of the brands means that the brands may 
blotch when applied to the animals, making the brands difficult to read 
and potentially requiring the animal to be re-branded. In addition the 
``MX'' brand required for spayed heifers and the ``MX'' 
brand for sexually intact cattle can be easily confused, resulting in 
doubt over whether animals have been correctly branded and in some 
cases causing them to be rejected for importation at the ports. The 
Government of Mexico has requested that we modify the requirements to 
address these issues.
    Accordingly, we are proposing to amend the requirements in Sec.  
93.427. In paragraph (c)(1), we would require steers and spayed heifers 
to be marked with a single ``M'' brand between 3 and 5 inches (7.5 and 
12.5 cm) tall and wide to be placed on the right hip within 4 inches 
(10 cm) of the midline of the tailhead. This should be interpreted as 
the top of the brand being within 4 inches of the midline of the 
tailhead and placed above the hook and pin bones. The brand should also 
be within 18 inches (45.7 cm) of the anus.
    Increasing the size of the brands and simplifying them to a simple 
``M'' would help reduce or eliminate branding errors, which in turn 
would reduce the need for rebranding and the incidence of cattle 
rejections at port-of-entry inspection. The change to the description 
of the placement of the brand clarifies the requirement by making the 
description more specific.
    Similarly, in paragraph (e)(3)(i) we would amend the branding 
option for sexually intact bovines from Mexico to provide for those 
animals to be branded with a single ``M'' brand between 3 and 5 inches 
(7.5 and 12.5 cm) tall and wide, located on the upper right front 
shoulder of the animal.
    As with the change for steers and spayed heifers, increasing the 
size of the brand for sexually intact animals would reduce or eliminate 
branding errors.

[[Page 15757]]

Changing the placement of the brand for sexually intact bovines from 
the hip to the shoulders would allow steers and spayed heifers to be 
visually distinguished from breeding cattle while allowing the use of 
the simplified brand for both categories of animals. We are not 
proposing to change the tattoo option for sexually intact bovines in 
paragraph (e)(3)(ii) because the MX tattoo has not posed a problem with 
confusion or errors as the brands have.

Executive Orders 12866 and 13771 and Regulatory Flexibility Act

    This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for 
the purposes of Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been 
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget. Further, APHIS 
considers this rule to be a deregulatory action under Executive Order 
13771 as the action may result in cost savings.
    In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 603, we have performed an initial 
regulatory flexibility analysis, which is summarized below, regarding 
the economic effects of this proposed rule on small entities. Copies of 
the full analysis are available by contacting the person listed under 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT or on the Regulations.gov website (see 
ADDRESSES above for instructions for accessing Regulations.gov).
    This proposed rule would amend the regulations in 9 CFR part 93 to 
change the identification requirements of bovines imported from Mexico. 
At present, cattle from Mexico carry at least two forms of 
identification, generally a brand and an approved eartag. Cattle 
imported from Mexico for other than immediate slaughter, are required 
to be branded with an ``M'' for steers, an ``Mx'' for spayed heifers, 
and an ``MX'' brand or tattoo for breeding bovines. APHIS is proposing 
that all bovines imported from Mexico be branded with a single ``M'' to 
avoid branding uncertainties. In order to distinguish between feeder 
and breeding cattle, the brand for steers and spayed heifers would be 
placed on the back hip and the brand for breeding cattle would be 
placed on the shoulder. Cattle imported from Mexico would still require 
an approved eartag.
    The new identification requirements would reduce if not eliminate 
questionable brands, reducing the need for rebranding and the incidence 
of cattle rejections at port-of-entry inspection. Revenue from hides 
accounts for about 75 percent of the byproduct-value of beef cattle. 
Damage from rebranding can reduce hide value. Also, re-inspection due 
to questionable brands increases transactions costs. Currently, a $4.00 
inspection fee per head is billed to the broker who in turn charges the 
exporter. The single ``M'' brand would both minimize hide damage and 
the need for re-inspections. Because the approved eartag is a current 
requirement, we do not anticipate any additional costs would be 
incurred.
    Entities that may be impacted by the proposed rule fall into 
various categories of the North American Industry Classification 
System. The majority of these businesses are small entities.
    Based on a sample of the percentage of cattle in fiscal year 2015 
that initially were not allowed entry from Mexico because of branding 
concerns, the decrease in the value of hides when rebranded, and the 
cost of re-inspection, we estimate annual cost savings attributable to 
the proposed rule may range from $113,900 to $248,700. There would also 
be unquantified cost savings from the expected reduction in delays at 
ports of entry due to branding issues. In accordance with guidance on 
complying with Executive Order 13771, the primary estimate of the cost 
savings for this rule is $181,300. This value is the mid-point of the 
above range in cost savings annualized in perpetuity using a 7 percent 
discount rate.

Executive Order 12988

    This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, 
Civil Justice Reform. If this proposed rule is adopted: (1) All State 
and local laws and regulations that are inconsistent with this rule 
will be preempted; (2) no retroactive effect will be given to this 
rule; and (3) administrative proceedings will not be required before 
parties may file suit in court challenging this rule.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    In accordance with section 3507(d) of the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the burden requirements included in 
this proposed rule are approved by the Office of Management and Budget 
under control number 0579-0040.

E-Government Act Compliance

    The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service is committed to 
compliance with the E-Government Act to promote the use of the internet 
and other information technologies, to provide increased opportunities 
for citizen access to Government information and services, and for 
other purposes. For information pertinent to E-Government Act 
compliance related to this proposed rule, please contact Ms. Kimberly 
Hardy, APHIS' Information Collection Coordinator, at (301) 851-2483.

List of Subjects in Part 93

    Animal diseases, Imports, Livestock, Poultry and poultry products, 
Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Accordingly, we propose to amend 9 CFR part 93 as follows:

PART 93--IMPORTATION OF CERTAIN ANIMALS, BIRDS, FISH, AND POULTRY, 
AND CERTAIN ANIMAL, BIRD, AND POULTRY PRODUCTS; REQUIREMENTS FOR 
MEANS OF CONVEYANCE AND SHIPPING CONTAINERS

0
1. The authority citation for part 93 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  7 U.S.C. 1622 and 8301-8317; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 
31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.4.

0
2. Section 93.427 is amended by revising paragraphs (c)(1) and 
(e)(3)(i) to read as follows:


Sec.  93.427  Cattle and other bovines from Mexico.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (1) Each steer or spayed heifer imported into the United States 
from Mexico shall be identified with a distinct, permanent, and legible 
``M'' mark applied with a freeze brand, hot iron, or other method prior 
to arrival at a port of entry, unless the steer or spayed heifer is 
imported for slaughter in accordance with Sec.  93.429. The ``M'' mark 
shall be between 3 inches (7.5 cm) and 5 inches (12.5 cm) high and 
wide, and shall be applied to each animal's right hip, within 4 inches 
(10 cm) of the midline of the tailhead (that is, the top of the brand 
should be within 4 inches (10 cm) of the midline of the tailhead, and 
placed above the hook and pin bones). The brand should also be within 
18 inches (45.7 cm) of the anus.
* * * * *
    (e) * * *
    (3) * * *
    (i) An ``M'' mark properly applied with a freeze brand, hot iron, 
or other method, and easily visible on the live animal and on the 
carcass before skinning. Such a mark must be between 3 inches (7.5 cm) 
and 5 inches (12.5 cm) high and wide, and must be applied to the upper 
right front shoulder of each animal; or
* * * * *


[[Page 15758]]


    Done in Washington, DC, this 9th day of April 2018.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-07585 Filed 4-11-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3410-34-P



                                                  15756

                                                  Proposed Rules                                                                                                 Federal Register
                                                                                                                                                                 Vol. 83, No. 71

                                                                                                                                                                 Thursday, April 12, 2018



                                                  This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER                    through Friday, except holidays. To be                    • A tattoo with the letters MX applied
                                                  contains notices to the public of the proposed          sure someone is there to help you,                     to the inside of one ear of the animal;
                                                  issuance of rules and regulations. The                  please call (202) 799–7039 before                      or
                                                  purpose of these notices is to give interested          coming.                                                   • Other means of permanent
                                                  persons an opportunity to participate in the                                                                   identification upon request if deemed
                                                  rule making prior to the adoption of the final          FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:   Dr.
                                                  rules.
                                                                                                                                                                 adequate by the Administrator to
                                                                                                          Betzaida Lopez, Senior Staff                           humanely identify the animal in a
                                                                                                          Veterinarian, National Import Export                   distinct and legible way as having been
                                                                                                          Services, Policy, Permitting, and                      imported from Mexico.
                                                  DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE                               Regulatory Services, VS, APHIS, 4700                      Several issues have arisen as a result
                                                  Animal and Plant Health Inspection                      River Road Unit 39, Riverdale, MD                      of the branding requirements. The small
                                                  Service                                                 20737–1231; (301) 851–3300.                            size of the brands means that the brands
                                                                                                          SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                             may blotch when applied to the
                                                  9 CFR Part 93                                                                                                  animals, making the brands difficult to
                                                                                                          Background                                             read and potentially requiring the
                                                  [Docket No. APHIS–2016–0050]
                                                                                                             The regulations in 9 CFR part 93                    animal to be re-branded. In addition the
                                                  RIN 0579–AE38                                           prohibit or restrict the importation of                ‘‘MX’’ brand required for spayed heifers
                                                                                                          certain animals, birds, and poultry into               and the ‘‘MX’’ brand for sexually intact
                                                  Branding Requirements for Bovines                       the United States to prevent the                       cattle can be easily confused, resulting
                                                  Imported Into the United States From                    introduction of communicable diseases                  in doubt over whether animals have
                                                  Mexico                                                  of livestock and poultry. Subpart D of                 been correctly branded and in some
                                                                                                          part 93 (§§ 93.400 through 93.436,                     cases causing them to be rejected for
                                                  AGENCY:  Animal and Plant Health
                                                                                                          referred to below as the regulations)                  importation at the ports. The
                                                  Inspection Service, USDA.
                                                                                                          governs the importation of ruminants;                  Government of Mexico has requested
                                                  ACTION: Proposed rule.                                                                                         that we modify the requirements to
                                                                                                          within subpart D, § 93.427 specifically
                                                  SUMMARY:   We are proposing to amend                    addresses the importation of cattle and                address these issues.
                                                  the regulations regarding the branding                  other bovines from Mexico into the                        Accordingly, we are proposing to
                                                  of bovines imported into the United                     United States.                                         amend the requirements in § 93.427. In
                                                  States from Mexico. We are taking this                                                                         paragraph (c)(1), we would require
                                                                                                             In § 93.427, paragraph (c) contains
                                                  action at the request of the Government                                                                        steers and spayed heifers to be marked
                                                                                                          conditions to prevent the spread of
                                                  of Mexico to address issues that have                                                                          with a single ‘‘M’’ brand between 3 and
                                                                                                          tuberculosis to U.S. livestock and
                                                  arisen with the branding requirement                                                                           5 inches (7.5 and 12.5 cm) tall and wide
                                                                                                          paragraph (e) contains conditions to
                                                  for these bovines. The changes we are                                                                          to be placed on the right hip within 4
                                                                                                          prevent the entry of bovine spongiform
                                                  proposing would help prevent                                                                                   inches (10 cm) of the midline of the
                                                                                                          encephalopathy (BSE) via the
                                                  inconsistencies in branding that can                                                                           tailhead. This should be interpreted as
                                                                                                          importation of cattle and other bovines
                                                  result in bovines being rejected for                                                                           the top of the brand being within 4
                                                                                                          from Mexico. Under paragraph (c)(1),
                                                  import into the United States.                                                                                 inches of the midline of the tailhead and
                                                                                                          steers imported into the United States
                                                                                                                                                                 placed above the hook and pin bones.
                                                  DATES: We will consider all comments                    must be identified with a distinct,
                                                                                                                                                                 The brand should also be within 18
                                                  that we receive on or before June 11,                   permanent, and legible ‘‘M’’ mark, and
                                                                                                                                                                 inches (45.7 cm) of the anus.
                                                  2018.                                                   spayed heifers must be identified with
                                                                                                                                                                    Increasing the size of the brands and
                                                                                                          a distinct, permanent, and legible ‘‘MX’’
                                                  ADDRESSES:   You may submit comments                                                                           simplifying them to a simple ‘‘M’’
                                                                                                          mark, applied with a freeze brand, hot
                                                  by either of the following methods:                                                                            would help reduce or eliminate
                                                                                                          iron, or other method prior to arrival at
                                                    • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to                                                                          branding errors, which in turn would
                                                                                                          a port of entry. The brands must not be
                                                  http://www.regulations.gov/#!docket                                                                            reduce the need for rebranding and the
                                                                                                          less than 2 inches or more than 3 inches
                                                  Detail;D=APHIS-2016-0050.                                                                                      incidence of cattle rejections at port-of-
                                                                                                          high, and must be applied to the
                                                    • Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:                                                                           entry inspection. The change to the
                                                                                                          animal’s right hip, high on the tailhead
                                                  Send your comment to Docket No.                                                                                description of the placement of the
                                                                                                          (over the junction of the sacral and first
                                                  APHIS-2016-0050, Regulatory Analysis                                                                           brand clarifies the requirement by
                                                                                                          coccygeal vertebrae).
                                                  and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station                                                                           making the description more specific.
                                                  3A–03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118,                         Under paragraph (e)(3), sexually                       Similarly, in paragraph (e)(3)(i) we
                                                  Riverdale, MD 20737–1238.                               intact bovines must be permanently and                 would amend the branding option for
                                                    Supporting documents and any                          humanely identified using one of the                   sexually intact bovines from Mexico to
                                                  comments we receive on this docket                      following methods:                                     provide for those animals to be branded
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS




                                                  may be viewed at http://                                   • An ‘‘MX’’ mark applied with a                     with a single ‘‘M’’ brand between 3 and
                                                  www.regulations.gov/#!docket                            freeze brand, hot iron, or other method                5 inches (7.5 and 12.5 cm) tall and wide,
                                                  Detail;D=APHIS-2016-0050 or in our                      prior to arrival at a port of entry. The               located on the upper right front
                                                  reading room, which is located in room                  brand must not be less than 2 inches or                shoulder of the animal.
                                                  1141 of the USDA South Building, 14th                   more than 3 inches high, and must be                      As with the change for steers and
                                                  Street and Independence Avenue SW,                      applied to the animal’s right hip, high                spayed heifers, increasing the size of the
                                                  Washington, DC. Normal reading room                     on the tailhead (over the junction of the              brand for sexually intact animals would
                                                  hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday                   sacral and first coccygeal vertebrae);                 reduce or eliminate branding errors.


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:09 Apr 11, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00001   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM   12APP1


                                                                          Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 71 / Thursday, April 12, 2018 / Proposed Rules                                             15757

                                                  Changing the placement of the brand for                 brands increases transactions costs.                   Collection Coordinator, at (301) 851–
                                                  sexually intact bovines from the hip to                 Currently, a $4.00 inspection fee per                  2483.
                                                  the shoulders would allow steers and                    head is billed to the broker who in turn
                                                  spayed heifers to be visually                           charges the exporter. The single ‘‘M’’                 List of Subjects in Part 93
                                                  distinguished from breeding cattle while                brand would both minimize hide                           Animal diseases, Imports, Livestock,
                                                  allowing the use of the simplified brand                damage and the need for re-inspections.                Poultry and poultry products,
                                                  for both categories of animals. We are                  Because the approved eartag is a current               Quarantine, Reporting and
                                                  not proposing to change the tattoo                      requirement, we do not anticipate any                  recordkeeping requirements.
                                                  option for sexually intact bovines in                   additional costs would be incurred.
                                                  paragraph (e)(3)(ii) because the MX                        Entities that may be impacted by the                  Accordingly, we propose to amend 9
                                                  tattoo has not posed a problem with                     proposed rule fall into various                        CFR part 93 as follows:
                                                  confusion or errors as the brands have.                 categories of the North American
                                                                                                          Industry Classification System. The                    PART 93—IMPORTATION OF CERTAIN
                                                  Executive Orders 12866 and 13771 and                                                                           ANIMALS, BIRDS, FISH, AND
                                                                                                          majority of these businesses are small
                                                  Regulatory Flexibility Act                                                                                     POULTRY, AND CERTAIN ANIMAL,
                                                                                                          entities.
                                                     This proposed rule has been                             Based on a sample of the percentage                 BIRD, AND POULTRY PRODUCTS;
                                                  determined to be not significant for the                of cattle in fiscal year 2015 that initially           REQUIREMENTS FOR MEANS OF
                                                  purposes of Executive Order 12866 and,                  were not allowed entry from Mexico                     CONVEYANCE AND SHIPPING
                                                  therefore, has not been reviewed by the                 because of branding concerns, the                      CONTAINERS
                                                  Office of Management and Budget.                        decrease in the value of hides when
                                                  Further, APHIS considers this rule to be                rebranded, and the cost of re-inspection,              ■ 1. The authority citation for part 93
                                                  a deregulatory action under Executive                   we estimate annual cost savings                        continues to read as follows:
                                                  Order 13771 as the action may result in                 attributable to the proposed rule may
                                                  cost savings.                                                                                                    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1622 and 8301–8317;
                                                                                                          range from $113,900 to $248,700. There
                                                     In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 603, we                                                                         21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7
                                                                                                          would also be unquantified cost savings
                                                  have performed an initial regulatory                                                                           CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.4.
                                                                                                          from the expected reduction in delays at
                                                  flexibility analysis, which is                          ports of entry due to branding issues. In              ■ 2. Section 93.427 is amended by
                                                  summarized below, regarding the                         accordance with guidance on complying                  revising paragraphs (c)(1) and (e)(3)(i) to
                                                  economic effects of this proposed rule                  with Executive Order 13771, the                        read as follows:
                                                  on small entities. Copies of the full                   primary estimate of the cost savings for
                                                  analysis are available by contacting the                this rule is $181,300. This value is the               § 93.427   Cattle and other bovines from
                                                  person listed under FOR FURTHER                         mid-point of the above range in cost                   Mexico.
                                                  INFORMATION CONTACT or on the                           savings annualized in perpetuity using                 *      *     *    *     *
                                                  Regulations.gov website (see ADDRESSES                  a 7 percent discount rate.
                                                  above for instructions for accessing                                                                              (c) * * *
                                                  Regulations.gov).                                       Executive Order 12988                                     (1) Each steer or spayed heifer
                                                     This proposed rule would amend the                      This proposed rule has been reviewed                imported into the United States from
                                                  regulations in 9 CFR part 93 to change                  under Executive Order 12988, Civil                     Mexico shall be identified with a
                                                  the identification requirements of                      Justice Reform. If this proposed rule is               distinct, permanent, and legible ‘‘M’’
                                                  bovines imported from Mexico. At                        adopted: (1) All State and local laws and              mark applied with a freeze brand, hot
                                                  present, cattle from Mexico carry at least              regulations that are inconsistent with                 iron, or other method prior to arrival at
                                                  two forms of identification, generally a                this rule will be preempted; (2) no                    a port of entry, unless the steer or
                                                  brand and an approved eartag. Cattle                    retroactive effect will be given to this               spayed heifer is imported for slaughter
                                                  imported from Mexico for other than                     rule; and (3) administrative proceedings               in accordance with § 93.429. The ‘‘M’’
                                                  immediate slaughter, are required to be                 will not be required before parties may                mark shall be between 3 inches (7.5 cm)
                                                  branded with an ‘‘M’’ for steers, an                    file suit in court challenging this rule.              and 5 inches (12.5 cm) high and wide,
                                                  ‘‘Mx’’ for spayed heifers, and an ‘‘MX’’                                                                       and shall be applied to each animal’s
                                                  brand or tattoo for breeding bovines.                   Paperwork Reduction Act
                                                                                                                                                                 right hip, within 4 inches (10 cm) of the
                                                  APHIS is proposing that all bovines                       In accordance with section 3507(d) of                midline of the tailhead (that is, the top
                                                  imported from Mexico be branded with                    the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995                    of the brand should be within 4 inches
                                                  a single ‘‘M’’ to avoid branding                        (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the burden                   (10 cm) of the midline of the tailhead,
                                                  uncertainties. In order to distinguish                  requirements included in this proposed                 and placed above the hook and pin
                                                  between feeder and breeding cattle, the                 rule are approved by the Office of                     bones). The brand should also be within
                                                  brand for steers and spayed heifers                     Management and Budget under control                    18 inches (45.7 cm) of the anus.
                                                  would be placed on the back hip and                     number 0579–0040.
                                                  the brand for breeding cattle would be                                                                         *      *     *    *     *
                                                  placed on the shoulder. Cattle imported                 E-Government Act Compliance                               (e) * * *
                                                  from Mexico would still require an                         The Animal and Plant Health                            (3) * * *
                                                  approved eartag.                                        Inspection Service is committed to
                                                     The new identification requirements                  compliance with the E-Government Act                      (i) An ‘‘M’’ mark properly applied
                                                  would reduce if not eliminate                           to promote the use of the internet and                 with a freeze brand, hot iron, or other
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS




                                                  questionable brands, reducing the need                  other information technologies, to                     method, and easily visible on the live
                                                  for rebranding and the incidence of                     provide increased opportunities for                    animal and on the carcass before
                                                  cattle rejections at port-of-entry                      citizen access to Government                           skinning. Such a mark must be between
                                                  inspection. Revenue from hides                          information and services, and for other                3 inches (7.5 cm) and 5 inches (12.5 cm)
                                                  accounts for about 75 percent of the                    purposes. For information pertinent to                 high and wide, and must be applied to
                                                  byproduct-value of beef cattle. Damage                  E-Government Act compliance related                    the upper right front shoulder of each
                                                  from rebranding can reduce hide value.                  to this proposed rule, please contact Ms.              animal; or
                                                  Also, re-inspection due to questionable                 Kimberly Hardy, APHIS’ Information                     *      *     *    *     *


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:09 Apr 11, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00002   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM   12APP1


                                                  15758                    Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 71 / Thursday, April 12, 2018 / Proposed Rules

                                                    Done in Washington, DC, this 9th day of               MS: BPHC; 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls                    Information Requested
                                                  April 2018.                                             Church, VA 22041–3803.
                                                  Kevin Shea,                                                We request that you send comments                   Public Comments
                                                  Administrator, Animal and Plant Health                  only by the methods described above.                      Any final action resulting from this
                                                  Inspection Service.                                     We will post all comments on http://                   proposed rule will be based on the best
                                                  [FR Doc. 2018–07585 Filed 4–11–18; 8:45 am]             www.regulations.gov. This generally                    scientific and commercial data available
                                                  BILLING CODE 3410–34–P                                  means that we will post any personal                   and be as accurate as possible.
                                                                                                          information you provide us (see                        Therefore, we request comments or
                                                                                                          Information Requested, below, for more                 information from other concerned
                                                  DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR                              information).                                          governmental agencies, Native
                                                                                                             Document availability: This proposed                American Tribes, the scientific
                                                  Fish and Wildlife Service                               rule and supporting documents are                      community, industry, or other
                                                                                                          available on http://www.regulations.gov.               interested parties concerning this
                                                  50 CFR 17                                               In addition, the supporting file for this              proposed rule. The comments that will
                                                                                                          proposed rule will be available for                    be most useful and likely to influence
                                                  [Docket No. FWS–R3–ES–2018–0005;                                                                               our decisions are those supported by
                                                                                                          public inspection, by appointment,
                                                  FXES11130900000]
                                                                                                          during normal business hours, at the                   data or peer-reviewed studies and those
                                                  RIN 1018–BC01                                           Michigan Ecological Services Field                     that include citations to, and analyses
                                                                                                          Office, 2651 Coolidge Road, Suite 101,                 of, applicable laws and regulations.
                                                  Endangered and Threatened Wildlife                      East Lansing, MI 48823; telephone 517–                 Please make your comments as specific
                                                  and Plants; Removing the Kirtland’s                     351–2555.                                              as possible and explain the basis for
                                                  Warbler From the Federal List of                        FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                       them. In addition, please include
                                                  Endangered and Threatened Wildlife                      Scott Hicks, Field Supervisor, Michigan                sufficient information with your
                                                  AGENCY:   Fish and Wildlife Service,                    Ecological Services Field Office, 2651                 comments to allow us to authenticate
                                                  Interior.                                               Coolidge Road, Suite 101, East Lansing,                any scientific or commercial data you
                                                  ACTION: Proposed rule.                                  MI 48823; telephone 517–351–2555;                      reference or provide. In particular, we
                                                                                                          facsimile 517–351–1443. If you use a                   seek comments concerning the
                                                  SUMMARY:    Under the authority of the                  telecommunications device for the deaf                 following:
                                                  Endangered Species Act of 1973, as                      (TDD), please call the Federal Relay                      (1) Reasons we should or should not
                                                  amended (Act), we, the U.S. Fish and                    Service at 800–877–8339.                               delist the Kirtland’s warbler.
                                                  Wildlife Service (Service), propose to                  SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                                                                                                                                    (2) New information on the historical
                                                  remove the Kirtland’s warbler                                                                                  and current status, range, distribution,
                                                  (Setophaga kirtlandii) from the Federal                 Executive Summary                                      and population size of the Kirtland’s
                                                  List of Endangered and Threatened                       Purpose of Regulatory Action                           warbler.
                                                  Wildlife (List) due to recovery. This                                                                             (3) New information on the known
                                                                                                            This action proposes to remove the                   and potential threats to the Kirtland’s
                                                  determination is based on a thorough
                                                                                                          Kirtland’s warbler from the Federal List               warbler on its breeding grounds, on its
                                                  review of the best available scientific
                                                                                                          of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife                  wintering grounds, and during
                                                  and commercial information, which
                                                                                                          in title 50 of the Code of Federal                     migration, including brood parasitism,
                                                  indicates that the threats to the species
                                                                                                          Regulations (50 CFR 17.11(h)) based on                 and habitat availability.
                                                  have been eliminated or reduced to the
                                                                                                          the species’ recovery. Removing a                         (4) Information on the timing and
                                                  point that the species has recovered and
                                                                                                          species from the List (‘‘delisting’’) can              extent of the effects of climate change
                                                  no longer meets the definition of
                                                                                                          only be completed by issuing a rule.                   on the Kirtland’s warbler.
                                                  endangered or threatened under the Act.
                                                                                                                                                                    (5) New information regarding the life
                                                  DATES: We will accept comments                          Basis for Action
                                                                                                                                                                 history, ecology, and habitat use of the
                                                  received or postmarked on or before July                   We may delist a species if the best                 Kirtland’s warbler.
                                                  11, 2018. We must receive requests for                  scientific and commercial data indicate                   (6) Current or planned activities
                                                  public hearings, in writing, at the                     the species is neither an endangered                   within the geographic range of the
                                                  address shown in FOR FURTHER                            species nor a threatened species for one               Kirtland’s warbler that may impact or
                                                  INFORMATION CONTACT by May 29, 2018.                    or more of the following reasons: (1) The              benefit the species.
                                                  ADDRESSES: Written comments: You may                    species is extinct; (2) the species has                   (7) The adequacy of conservation
                                                  submit comments by one of the                           recovered; or (3) the original data used               agreements that would be implemented
                                                  following methods:                                      at the time the species was classified                 if the species is delisted.
                                                    (1) Electronically: Go to the Federal                 were in error (50 CFR 424.11). Here, we                   Please note that submissions merely
                                                  eRulemaking Portal: http://                             have determined that the species may be                stating support for or opposition to the
                                                  www.regulations.gov. In the Search box,                 delisted based on recovery. A species                  action under consideration without
                                                  enter FWS–R3–ES–2018–0005, which is                     may be delisted based on recovery only                 providing supporting information,
                                                  the docket number for this rulemaking.                  if the best scientific and commercial                  although noted, will not be considered
                                                  Then, click on the Search button. On the                data indicate that it is no longer                     in making a determination, as section
                                                  resulting page, in the Search panel on                  endangered or threatened.                              4(b)(1)(A) of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
                                                  the left side of the screen, under the                     The threats that led to the species                 seq.) directs that determinations as to
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS




                                                  Document Type heading, click on the                     being listed under the Act (primarily                  whether any species is an endangered or
                                                  Proposed Rules link to locate this                      loss of the species’ habitat and effects of            threatened species must be made
                                                  document. You may submit a comment                      brood parasitism by brown-headed                       ‘‘solely on the basis of the best scientific
                                                  by clicking on ‘‘Comment Now!’’                         cowbirds) have been removed,                           and commercial data available.’’
                                                    (2) By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail                 ameliorated, or are being appropriately                   Prior to issuing a final rule on this
                                                  or hand-delivery to: Public Comments                    managed by the actions of multiple                     proposed action, we will take into
                                                  Processing, Attn: FWS–R3–ES–2018–                       conservation partners over the past 50                 consideration all comments and any
                                                  0005, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,                   years.                                                 additional information we receive. Such


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:09 Apr 11, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00003   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM   12APP1



Document Created: 2018-11-02 08:14:38
Document Modified: 2018-11-02 08:14:38
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionProposed Rules
ActionProposed rule.
DatesWe will consider all comments that we receive on or before June 11, 2018.
ContactDr. Betzaida Lopez, Senior Staff Veterinarian, National Import Export Services, Policy, Permitting, and Regulatory Services, VS, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 39, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231; (301) 851-3300.
FR Citation83 FR 15756 
RIN Number0579-AE38

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR