83_FR_16126 83 FR 16054 - Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016

83 FR 16054 - Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 72 (April 13, 2018)

Page Range16054-16055
FR Document2018-07724

The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Navneet Education Ltd. (Navneet) made sales of certain lined paper products (CLPP) from India below normal value during the period of review (POR) September 1, 2015, through August 31, 2016, but SAB International (SAB) did not.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 72 (Friday, April 13, 2018) 
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 72 (Friday, April 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16054-16055]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-07724]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-843]


Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Navneet 
Education Ltd. (Navneet) made sales of certain lined paper products 
(CLPP) from India below normal value during the period of review (POR) 
September 1, 2015, through August 31, 2016, but SAB International (SAB) 
did not.

DATES: Applicable April 13, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Samuel Brummitt (for Navneet) and 
Cindy Robinson (for SAB), AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement 
and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington DC 20230; telephone 
(202) 482-7851 or (202) 482-3797, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On October 6, 2017, Commerce published the Preliminary Results.\1\ 
On November 6, 2017, the petitioners,\2\ Navneet, and SAB timely 
submitted their case briefs.\3\ On November 6, 2017, the petitioner 
submitted a request for a hearing, which it subsequently withdrew on 
December 8, 2017.\4\ On November 13, 2017, the petitioners and Navneet 
timely submitted their respective rebuttal briefs.\5\ On January 19, 
2018, Commerce postponed the final results by 60 days, until April 4, 
2018.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary 
Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016, 82 FR 46764 (October 6, 
2017) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum.
    \2\ The petitioners are the Association of American School Paper 
Suppliers and its individual members.
    \3\ See the petitioners' letter titled, ``Certain Lined Paper 
Products from India: Case Brief of the Association of American 
School Paper Suppliers,'' dated November 6, 2017; see also Navneet's 
letter titled, ``Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Case Brief 
of Navneet Education Limited,'' dated November 6, 2017; see also 
SAB's letter titled, ``Certain Lined Paper Products from India: SAB 
International Case Brief,'' dated November 6, 2017.
    \4\ See the petitioner's letter titled, ``Certain Lined Paper 
Products from India: Request for Hearing,'' dated November 6, 2017; 
see also Memorandum to the File titled, ``Petitioner's Request for a 
Meeting in Lieu of a Hearing,'' dated December 8, 2017.
    \5\ See the petitioners' letter titled, ``Certain Lined Paper 
Products from India: Rebuttal Brief of the Association of American 
School Paper Suppliers,'' dated November 13, 2017; see also 
Navneet's letter titled, ``Certain Lined Paper Products from India: 
Rebuttal Brief of Navneet Education Limited,'' dated November 13, 
2017.
    \6\ See Memorandum titled ``Certain Lined Paper Products from 
India: Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review,'' dated January 19, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce exercised its discretion to toll all deadlines affected by 
the closure of the Federal Government from January 20 through 22, 2018. 
The revised deadline for the final results of this review is now April 
9, 2018.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Memorandum for The Record from Christian Marsh, Deputy 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, performing the 
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance, ``Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of 
the Federal Government'' (Tolling Memorandum), dated January 23, 
2018. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding affected by 
the closure of the Federal Government, including the final results, 
have been extended by 3 days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by the order is certain lined paper 
products. The merchandise subject to this order is currently classified 
under the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
(HTSUS) subheadings: 4811.90.9035, 4811.90.9080, 4820.30.0040, 
4810.22.5044, 4811.90.9050, 4811.90.9090, 4820.10.2010, 4820.10.2020, 
4820.10.2030, 4820.10.2040, 4820.10.2050, 4820.10.2060, and 
4820.10.4000. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience 
and customs purposes, the written product description of the scope 
remains dispositive.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ For a complete description of the Scope of the Order, see 
Memorandum titled ``Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Issues 
and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016,'' dated concurrently with and 
hereby adopted by this notice (``Issues and Decision Memorandum'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to 
this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum. A list of the issues that parties raised and to which we 
responded is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and 
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on-file electronically 
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at https://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records 
Unit (CRU), room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In 
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can 
be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the 
electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical 
in content.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on a review of the record and comments received from 
interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we made the 
following company-specific change to Navneet's final margin 
calculation: (1) We did not make a duty drawback adjustment for duties 
paid on imported input materials used to produce the subject 
merchandise; (2) we made certain revisions to Navneet's home market 
(HM) price to account for excise taxes and local body taxes; and (3) we 
made changes to Navneet's HM program by converting the variable PRIMEH 
to `1' to match the format used for the variable PRIMEU. As a result of 
these changes, we determine that Navneet made sales of subject 
merchandise below normal value during the POR and have calculated a 
final weighted-average dumping margin of 1.34 percent. We made no 
change to SAB's preliminary SAS margin program and, therefore, SAB's 
preliminary margin remains unchanged for these final results.

Final Results of the Review

    As a result of this review, Commerce calculated the following 
dumping

[[Page 16055]]

margins for Navneet and SAB. We are applying to the non-selected 
companies the rates calculated for the mandatory respondents in these 
final results, excluding any zero and de minimis margins, as referenced 
below.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Albemarle Corp. & Subsidiaries v. United States, 821 
F.3d 1345, 1351-53 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (Albemarle).

 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Weighted-
                                                              average
                    Producer/exporter                     dumping margin
                                                             (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Navneet Education Ltd...................................            1.34
SAB International.......................................            0.00
Kokuyo Riddhi Paper Products Pvt. Ltd...................            1.34
Magic International Pvt. Ltd............................            1.34
Pioneer Stationery Pvt Ltd..............................            1.34
SGM Paper Products......................................            1.34
Super Impex.............................................            1.34
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Duty Assessment

    Commerce shall determine and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 
shall assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries.\10\ 
Specifically, for Navneet and SAB, we will instruct CBP to liquidate 
their entries during the POR imported by the importers (or customers) 
identified in their questionnaire responses without regard to 
antidumping duties because their weighted-average dumping margins in 
these final results is zero.\11\ In accordance with Commerce's 
practice, for entries of subject merchandise during the POR for which 
Navneet or SAB did not know that the merchandise was destined for the 
United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the 
all-others rate if there is no company-specific rate for the 
intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.\12\ We intend to 
issue assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after publication 
of the final results of this review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ In these final results, Commerce applied the assessment 
rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: 
Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment 
Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 
8101 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for Reviews).
    \11\ Id., 77 FR at 8102.
    \12\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for 
all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the 
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act): (1) The cash 
deposit rate for respondents noted above will be the rate established 
in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise 
exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this 
administrative review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, 
the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company specific rate 
published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; 
(3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior 
review, or the original investigation, but the manufacturer is, the 
cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently 
completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of the 
subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 
manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 3.91 percent, the all-
others rate established in the original antidumping duty 
investigation.\13\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less 
Than Fair Value: Certain Lined Paper Products from the People's 
Republic of China; Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined 
Paper Products from India, Indonesia and the People's Republic of 
China; and Notice of Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper 
Products from India and Indonesia, 71 FR 56949 (September 28, 2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to 
liquidation of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred and 
the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction 
of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an 
APO is a sanctionable violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h).

    Dated: April 9, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Final Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. List of Comments
III. Background
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Analysis of Comments
    Comments Concerning Navneet
    1. Whether Commerce Should Reclassify Navneet's Reported Levels 
of Trade
    2. Whether Commerce Should Grant Navneet's Claimed Duty Drawback 
Adjustment
    3. Whether Commerce Should Grant an Adjustment for Defective 
Product Claims Reported in the Other Rebates Field
    4. Treatment of Navneet's Excise Expense and Local Body Tax in 
Home Market Price and Cost Calculation
    5. Whether Commerce Should Correct the Miscoded PRIMEU Field
    Comment Concerning SAB
    6. Whether Certain Chain Stores Who May Be the Importer of 
Record Should Be Included in the Liquidation Instructions
VI. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2018-07724 Filed 4-12-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

16054 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 72 / Friday, April 13, 2018 / Notices 1. Purchase of Electricity for More Than November 6, 2017, the petitioners,2 product description of the scope Adequate Remuneration (MTAR)—Sales Navneet, and SAB timely submitted remains dispositive.8 via Build-Operate-Own, Build-Operate- their case briefs.3 On November 6, 2017, Transfer, and Transfer of Operating Analysis of Comments Received the petitioner submitted a request for a Rights Contracts All issues raised in the case and 2. Purchase of Electricity Generated From hearing, which it subsequently withdrew on December 8, 2017.4 On rebuttal briefs by parties to this Renewable Resources for MTAR 3. Provision of Lignite for LTAR November 13, 2017, the petitioners and administrative review are addressed in 4. Reduction and Exemption of Licensing Navneet timely submitted their the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Fees for Renewable Resource Power respective rebuttal briefs.5 On January A list of the issues that parties raised Plants 19, 2018, Commerce postponed the final and to which we responded is attached 5. Research and Development Grant results by 60 days, until April 4, 2018.6 to this notice as an Appendix. The Program Issues and Decision Memorandum is a 6. Export Credits, Loans, and Insurance Commerce exercised its discretion to public document and is on-file From Turk Eximbank toll all deadlines affected by the closure electronically via Enforcement and 7. Regional Investment Incentives of the Federal Government from January Compliance’s Antidumping and 8. Large-Scale Investment Incentives 20 through 22, 2018. The revised Countervailing Duty Centralized 9. Strategic Investment Incentives deadline for the final results of this 10. Incentives for Research & Development Electronic Service System (ACCESS). review is now April 9, 2018.7 Activities ACCESS is available to registered users 11. Regional Development Subsidies Scope of the Order at https://access.trade.gov and in the IX. Analysis of Comments Central Records Unit (CRU), room Comment: Whether Commerce Should The merchandise covered by the order B8024 of the main Department of Modify the Natural Gas Benchmark is certain lined paper products. The Commerce building. In addition, a X. Conclusion merchandise subject to this order is complete version of the Issues and [FR Doc. 2018–07722 Filed 4–12–18; 8:45 am] currently classified under the following Decision Memorandum can be accessed Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the directly on the internet at http:// BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P United States (HTSUS) subheadings: enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. 4811.90.9035, 4811.90.9080, The signed Issues and Decision DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 4820.30.0040, 4810.22.5044, Memorandum and the electronic 4811.90.9050, 4811.90.9090, versions of the Issues and Decision International Trade Administration 4820.10.2010, 4820.10.2020, Memorandum are identical in content. 4820.10.2030, 4820.10.2040, [A–533–843] Changes Since the Preliminary Results 4820.10.2050, 4820.10.2060, and Certain Lined Paper Products From 4820.10.4000. Although the HTSUS Based on a review of the record and India: Final Results of Antidumping numbers are provided for convenience comments received from interested Duty Administrative Review; 2015– and customs purposes, the written parties regarding our Preliminary 2016 Results, we made the following 46764 (October 6, 2017) (Preliminary Results), and company-specific change to Navneet’s AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. final margin calculation: (1) We did not 2 The petitioners are the Association of American International Trade Administration, make a duty drawback adjustment for School Paper Suppliers and its individual members. Department of Commerce. 3 See the petitioners’ letter titled, ‘‘Certain Lined duties paid on imported input materials SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Paper Products from India: Case Brief of the used to produce the subject (Commerce) determines that Navneet Association of American School Paper Suppliers,’’ merchandise; (2) we made certain Education Ltd. (Navneet) made sales of dated November 6, 2017; see also Navneet’s letter revisions to Navneet’s home market certain lined paper products (CLPP) titled, ‘‘Certain Lined Paper Products from India: (HM) price to account for excise taxes Case Brief of Navneet Education Limited,’’ dated from India below normal value during November 6, 2017; see also SAB’s letter titled, and local body taxes; and (3) we made the period of review (POR) September 1, ‘‘Certain Lined Paper Products from India: SAB changes to Navneet’s HM program by 2015, through August 31, 2016, but SAB International Case Brief,’’ dated November 6, 2017. converting the variable PRIMEH to ‘1’ to International (SAB) did not. 4 See the petitioner’s letter titled, ‘‘Certain Lined match the format used for the variable Paper Products from India: Request for Hearing,’’ PRIMEU. As a result of these changes, DATES: Applicable April 13, 2018. dated November 6, 2017; see also Memorandum to the File titled, ‘‘Petitioner’s Request for a Meeting we determine that Navneet made sales FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: in Lieu of a Hearing,’’ dated December 8, 2017. of subject merchandise below normal Samuel Brummitt (for Navneet) and 5 See the petitioners’ letter titled, ‘‘Certain Lined value during the POR and have Cindy Robinson (for SAB), AD/CVD Paper Products from India: Rebuttal Brief of the calculated a final weighted-average Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Association of American School Paper Suppliers,’’ dumping margin of 1.34 percent. We Compliance, International Trade dated November 13, 2017; see also Navneet’s letter titled, ‘‘Certain Lined Paper Products from India: made no change to SAB’s preliminary Administration, U.S. Department of Rebuttal Brief of Navneet Education Limited,’’ SAS margin program and, therefore, Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue dated November 13, 2017. SAB’s preliminary margin remains NW, Washington DC 20230; telephone 6 See Memorandum titled ‘‘Certain Lined Paper unchanged for these final results. (202) 482–7851 or (202) 482–3797, Products from India: Extension of Time Limit for respectively. Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Final Results of the Review Review,’’ dated January 19, 2018. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 7 See Memorandum for The Record from As a result of this review, Commerce Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for calculated the following dumping Background daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES Enforcement and Compliance, performing the non- On October 6, 2017, Commerce exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant 8 For a complete description of the Scope of the Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, Order, see Memorandum titled ‘‘Certain Lined published the Preliminary Results.1 On ‘‘Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the Paper Products from India: Issues and Decision Federal Government’’ (Tolling Memorandum), Memorandum for the Final Results of the 1 See Certain Lined Paper Products from India: dated January 23, 2018. All deadlines in this Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015– Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty segment of the proceeding affected by the closure 2016,’’ dated concurrently with and hereby adopted Administrative Review and Preliminary of the Federal Government, including the final by this notice (‘‘Issues and Decision Determination of No Shipments; 2015–2016, 82 FR results, have been extended by 3 days. Memorandum’’). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:41 Apr 12, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM 13APN1

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 72 / Friday, April 13, 2018 / Notices 16055 margins for Navneet and SAB. We are shipments of subject merchandise of the proceeding. Timely written applying to the non-selected companies entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, notification of the return/destruction of the rates calculated for the mandatory for consumption on or after the APO materials, or conversion to judicial respondents in these final results, publication date of the final results of protective order, is hereby requested. excluding any zero and de minimis this administrative review, as provided Failure to comply with the regulations margins, as referenced below.9 by section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of and the terms of an APO is a 1930, as amended (the Act): (1) The cash sanctionable violation. deposit rate for respondents noted above will be the rate established in the final Notification to Interested Parties Weighted- results of this administrative review; (2) We are issuing and publishing this average for merchandise exported by notice in accordance with sections Producer/exporter dumping margin manufacturers or exporters not covered 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 (percent) in this administrative review but CFR 351.213(h). covered in a prior segment of the Dated: April 9, 2018. Navneet Education Ltd ......... 1.34 proceeding, the cash deposit rate will Gary Taverman, SAB International .................. 0.00 continue to be the company specific rate Kokuyo Riddhi Paper Prod- Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping published for the most recently and Countervailing Duty Operations, ucts Pvt. Ltd ...................... 1.34 Magic International Pvt. Ltd .. 1.34 completed segment of this proceeding; performing the non-exclusive functions and Pioneer Stationery Pvt Ltd ... 1.34 (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered duties of the Assistant Secretary for SGM Paper Products ........... 1.34 in this review, a prior review, or the Enforcement and Compliance. Super Impex ......................... 1.34 original investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate Appendix Duty Assessment will be the rate established for the most List of Topics Discussed in the Final recently completed segment of this Decision Memorandum Commerce shall determine and proceeding for the manufacturer of the I. Summary Customs and Border Protection (CBP) subject merchandise; and (4) the cash II. List of Comments shall assess antidumping duties on all III. Background deposit rate for all other manufacturers appropriate entries. Specifically, for 10 IV. Scope of the Order or exporters will continue to be 3.91 Navneet and SAB, we will instruct CBP V. Analysis of Comments percent, the all-others rate established to liquidate their entries during the POR Comments Concerning Navneet in the original antidumping duty imported by the importers (or 1. Whether Commerce Should Reclassify investigation.13 These cash deposit Navneet’s Reported Levels of Trade customers) identified in their requirements, when imposed, shall 2. Whether Commerce Should Grant questionnaire responses without regard remain in effect until further notice. Navneet’s Claimed Duty Drawback to antidumping duties because their Adjustment weighted-average dumping margins in Notification to Importers Regarding the 3. Whether Commerce Should Grant an these final results is zero.11 In Reimbursement of Duties Adjustment for Defective Product Claims accordance with Commerce’s practice, This notice also serves as a final Reported in the Other Rebates Field for entries of subject merchandise reminder to importers of their 4. Treatment of Navneet’s Excise Expense during the POR for which Navneet or responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) and Local Body Tax in Home Market SAB did not know that the merchandise to file a certificate regarding the Price and Cost Calculation was destined for the United States, we 5. Whether Commerce Should Correct the reimbursement of antidumping and/or will instruct CBP to liquidate such Miscoded PRIMEU Field countervailing duties prior to Comment Concerning SAB entries at the all-others rate if there is no liquidation of the relevant entries 6. Whether Certain Chain Stores Who May company-specific rate for the during the POR. Failure to comply with Be the Importer of Record Should Be intermediate company(ies) involved in this requirement could result in Included in the Liquidation Instructions the transaction.12 We intend to issue Commerce’s presumption that VI. Recommendation assessment instructions directly to CBP reimbursement of antidumping and/or [FR Doc. 2018–07724 Filed 4–12–18; 8:45 am] 15 days after publication of the final countervailing duties occurred and the BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P results of this review. subsequent assessment of doubled Cash Deposit Requirements antidumping duties. The following cash deposit Administrative Protective Order DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE requirements will be effective upon This notice also serves as a reminder International Trade Administration publication of the notice of final results to parties subject to administrative of administrative review for all protective orders (APO) of their [C–570–913] responsibility concerning the return or 9 See Albemarle Corp. & Subsidiaries v. United Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road destruction of proprietary information States, 821 F.3d 1345, 1351–53 (Fed. Cir. 2016) Tires From the People’s Republic of disclosed under APO in accordance (Albemarle). China: Final Results of Countervailing 10 In these final results, Commerce applied the with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which Duty Administrative Review; 2015 assessment rate calculation method adopted in continues to govern business Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the proprietary information in this segment AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and International Trade Administration, daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 13 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Department of Commerce. Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Lined Paper (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for Products from the People’s Republic of China; SUMMARY: On October 6, 2017, the Reviews). Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined Department of Commerce (Commerce) 11 Id., 77 FR at 8102. 12 For a full discussion of this practice, see Paper Products from India, Indonesia and the published the preliminary results of the People’s Republic of China; and Notice of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper administrative review of the Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 Products from India and Indonesia, 71 FR 56949 countervailing duty order on certain (May 6, 2003). (September 28, 2006). new pneumatic off-the-road tires (OTR VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:41 Apr 12, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM 13APN1


Document Created: 2018-04-13 00:18:04
Document Modified: 2018-04-13 00:18:04
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesApplicable April 13, 2018.
ContactSamuel Brummitt (for Navneet) and Cindy Robinson (for SAB), AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-7851 or (202) 482-3797, respectively.
FR Citation83 FR 16054 
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR