83_FR_16399 83 FR 16326 - Certain Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing of Carbon and Alloy Steel From the Federal Republic of Germany: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value

83 FR 16326 - Certain Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing of Carbon and Alloy Steel From the Federal Republic of Germany: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 73 (April 16, 2018)

Page Range16326-16328
FR Document2018-07850

The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain cold-drawn mechanical tubing of carbon and alloy steel (cold-drawn mechanical tubing) from the Federal Republic of Germany (Germany) is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The final estimated weighted-average dumping margins of sales at LTFV are listed below in the section entitled ``Final Determination.'' The period of investigation (POI) is April 1, 2016, through March 31, 2017.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 73 (Monday, April 16, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 73 (Monday, April 16, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16326-16328]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-07850]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-428-845]


Certain Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing of Carbon and Alloy Steel 
From the Federal Republic of Germany: Final Affirmative Determination 
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain 
cold-drawn mechanical tubing of carbon and alloy steel (cold-drawn 
mechanical tubing) from the Federal Republic of Germany (Germany) is 
being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair 
value (LTFV). The final estimated weighted-average dumping margins of 
sales at LTFV are listed below in the section entitled ``Final 
Determination.'' The period of investigation (POI) is April 1, 2016, 
through March 31, 2017.

DATES: Applicable April 16, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frances Veith, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4295.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On November 22, 2017, Commerce published the Preliminary 
Determination of sales at LTFV of cold-drawn mechanical tubing from 
Germany.\1\ Commerce invited comments from interested parties on the 
Preliminary Determination.\2\ The petitioners,\3\ Benteler Steel/Tube 
GmbH (Benteler), Salzgitter Mannesmann Line Pipe GmbH (Salzgitter), 
filed case \4\ and rebuttal briefs.\5\ Commerce exercised its 
discretion to toll deadlines affected by the closure of the Federal 
Government from January 20 through 22, 2018. The revised deadline for 
the final determination of this investigation is now April 9, 2018.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing of Carbon and Alloy 
Steel from the Federal Republic of Germany: Preliminary Affirmative 
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of 
Final Determination, 82 FR 55558 (November 22, 2017) (Preliminary 
Determination), and accompanying Preliminary Issues and Decision 
Memorandum (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
    \2\ See Preliminary Determination, 83 FR at 55559.
    \3\ ArcelorMittal Tubular Products, Michigan Seamless Tube, LLC, 
PTC Alliance Corp., Plymouth Tube Co. USA, Webco Industries, Inc., 
and Zekelman Industries, Inc. (collectively, the petitioners).
    \4\ See the petitioners' Case Brief, ``Petitioners' Case 
Brief,'' dated March 9, 2018 (Petitioners' Case Brief); Salzgitter's 
Case Brief, ``Antidumping Duty Investigation of Cold-Drawn 
Mechanical Tubing of Carbon and Alloy Steel from Federal Republic of 
Germany: Case Brief,'' dated March 9, 2018 (Salzgitter's Case 
Brief); and Bentler's Case Brief, ``Antidumping Duty Investigation 
of Certain Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing of Carbon and Alloy Steel 
from Germany: Resubmission of Case Brief,'' dated March 27, 2018 (on 
March 26, 2018, Commece rejected and removed Benteler's timely filed 
case brief, submitted on March 9, 2018, from the record and Benteler 
refiled its case brief with certain information redacted on March 
27, 2018).
    \5\ See the petitioners' Rebuttal Brief, ``Petitioners' Rebuttal 
Brief on Salzgitter,'' dated March 14, 2018; the petitioners' 
Rebuttal Brief, ``Petitioners' Rebuttal Brief on Benteler 
Corrected,'' dated March 27, 2018 (on March 26, 2018, Commece 
rejected and removed the petitioners' timely filed rebuttal brief on 
Benteler, submitted on March 14, 2018, from the record and the 
petitioner refiled its rebuttal brief on Benteler with certain 
information redacted on March 27, 2018); and Bentler's Rebuttal 
Brief, ``Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain Cold-Drawn 
Mechanical Tubing of Carbon and Alloy Steel from Germany: Rebuttal 
Case Brief,'' dated March 14, 2018.
    \6\ See Memorandum, ``Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the 
Federal Government,'' dated January 23, 2018. All deadlines in this 
segment of the proceeding have been extended by 3 days. If the new 
deadline falls on a non-business day, in accordance with Commerce's 
practice, the deadline will become the next business day. See Notice 
of Clarification: Application of ``Next Business Day'' Rule for 
Administrative Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 
1930, as Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The participating mandatory respondent in this investigation is 
Benteler. In addition, while two other respondents were selected as 
mandatory respondents, pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act, 
Commerce continues to rely upon facts otherwise available, with adverse 
inferences (AFA) in determining the estimated weighted-average dumping 
margins for Mubea Fahrwerksfedern GmbH (Mubea) and Salzgitter 
Mannesmann Line Pipe GmbH (Salzgitter). Also, for certain Benteler 
sales transactions, we relied upon AFA and partial facts available, 
with adverse inferences, pursuant to section 776(a) and (b) of the Act. 
For a full description of the methodology underlying the final 
determination, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
    A complete summary of the events that occurred since Commerce 
published the Preliminary Determination, as well as a full discussion 
of the issues raised by parties for this final determination, may be 
found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Determination in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain 
Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing of Carbon and Alloy Steel from the 
Federal Republic of Germany,'' dated concurrently with this 
determination and hereby adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision 
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is 
available electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping 
and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and 
to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B-8024 of Commerce's 
main building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum can be accessed at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and electronic version 
are identical in content.

Scope of the Investigation

    The product covered by this investigation is cold-drawn mechanical 
tubing from Germany. In the Preliminary Determination, we set a 
separate briefing schedule on scope issues for interested parties.\8\ 
Certain interested parties commented on the scope of the investigation 
as it appeared in the Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum.\9\ On 
December 4, 2017,

[[Page 16327]]

the petitioners withdrew a portion of their comments regarding the 
scope language.\10\ Commerce addressed all scope comments received in 
the Final Scope Decision Memorandum and made changes to the scope that 
appeared in the Preliminary Determination.\11\ For the full scope of 
this investigation, see the scope in Appendix I to this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Preliminary Determination, 82 FR at 55559. The scope 
case briefs were due five days after the publication of the 
preliminary less than fair value determinations for China, Germany, 
India, Italy, Korea, and Switzerland in the Federal Register, and 
the rebuttal briefs were due three days after the due date for the 
scope case briefs, i.e., Monday, November 27, 2017 and Thursday, 
November 30, 2017.
    \9\ See Memorandum, ``Certain Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing of 
Carbon and Alloy Steel from the Federal Republic of Germany, India, 
Italy, the Republic of Korea, the People's Republic of China, and 
Switzerland: Scope Comments Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary 
Determinations,'' dated November 15, 2017 (Preliminary Scope 
Decision Memorandum).
    \10\ See the petitioners' Letter, ``Certain Cold-Drawn 
Mechanical Tubing from Germany et al.--EN-10305-3,'' dated December 
4, 2017.
    \11\ See Memorandum, ``Certain Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing of 
Carbon and Alloy Steel from the Federal Republic of Germany, India, 
Italy, the Republic of Korea, the People's Republic of China, and 
Switzerland: Scope Comments Decision Memorandum for the Final 
Determinations,'' dated December 4, 2017 (Final Scope Decision 
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Period of Investigation

    The POI is April 1, 2016, through March 31, 2017.

Verification

    As provided in section 782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 
(the Act), Commerce verified the sales and cost data reported by 
Benteler for use in our final determination. We used standard 
verification procedures, including an examination of relevant 
accounting and production records, and original source documents 
provided by the respondent.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case briefs and rebuttal briefs submitted 
by interested parties in this proceeding are discussed in the Issues 
and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues raised by parties and 
responded to by Commerce in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is 
attached at Appendix II.

Changes Since the Preliminary Determination

    Based on our analysis of the comments received and our findings at 
verification, we made certain changes to the margin calculations for 
Benteler since the Preliminary Determination. These changes are 
discussed in the ``Margin Calculations'' section of the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.

All-Others Rate

    Commerce calculated an individual estimated weighted-average 
dumping margin for Benteler, the only individually examined exporter/
producer that is participating in this investigation. Because the only 
individually calculated dumping margin is not zero, de minimis, or 
based entirely on facts otherwise available, the estimated weighted-
average dumping margin calculated for Benteler is the margin assigned 
to all-other producers and exporters, pursuant to section 735(c)(5)(A) 
of the Act.

Final Determination Margins

    The weighted-average dumping margins are as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Estimated
                                                             weighted-
                    Exporter/producer                         average
                                                          dumping margin
                                                             (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
BENTELER Steel/Tube GmbH/BENTELER Distribution                      3.11
 International GmbH \12\................................
Mubea Fahrwerksfedern GmbH..............................          209.06
Salzgitter Mannesmann Line Pipe GmbH....................          209.06
All-Others..............................................            3.11
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ In the Preliminary Determination, Commerce found that BENTELER
  Steel/Tube GmbH and BENTELER Distribution International GmbH are a
  single entity and, because there were no changes to the facts which
  supported that decision, since that determination was made, we
  continue to find that these companies are part of a single entity for
  this final determination. See also Preliminary Decision Memorandum.

Disclosure

    We will disclose the calculations performed within five days of any 
public announcement of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.224(b).

Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation

    In accordance with section 735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, we will 
instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to continue the 
suspension of liquidation of all appropriate entries of cold-drawn 
mechanical tubing from Germany, as described in Appendix I of this 
notice, which were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for 
consumption on or after November 22, 2017, the date of publication of 
the Preliminary Determination of this investigation in the Federal 
Register. Further, Commerce will instruct CBP to require a cash deposit 
equal to the estimated amount by which the normal value exceeds the 
U.S. price as shown above.
    Pursuant to section 735(c)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.210(d), Commerce will instruct CBP to require a cash deposit for 
such entries of merchandise equal to the estimated weighted-average 
dumping margin or the estimated all-others rate, as follows: (1) The 
cash deposit rate for the respondents listed above will be equal to the 
respondent-specific estimated weighted-average dumping margin 
determined in this final determination; (2) if the exporter is not a 
respondent identified above but the producer is, then the cash deposit 
rate will be equal to the respondent-specific estimated weighted-
average dumping margin established for that producer of the subject 
merchandise; and (3) the cash deposit rate for all other producers and 
exporters will be equal to the all-others estimated weighted-average 
dumping margin.

International Trade Commission Notification

    In accordance with section 735(d) of the Act, we will notify the 
International Trade Commission (ITC) of the final affirmative 
determination of sales at LTFV. Because the final determination in this 
proceeding is affirmative, in accordance with section 735(b)(2) of the 
Act, the ITC will make its final determination as to whether the 
domestic industry in the United States is materially injured, or 
threatened with material injury, by reason of imports, or sales (or the 
likelihood of sales) for importation of cold-drawn mechanical tubing 
from Germany no later than 45 days after our final determination. If 
the ITC determines that material injury or threat of material injury 
does not exist, the proceeding will be terminated and all cash deposits 
will be refunded. If the ITC determines that such injury does exist, 
Commerce will issue an antidumping duty order directing CBP

[[Page 16328]]

to assess, upon further instruction by Commerce, antidumping duties on 
all imports of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the effective date of the 
suspension of liquidation.

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders

    This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely notification of the 
return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial 
protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the 
regulations and the terms of an APO is a violation subject to sanction.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing this determination and notice in 
accordance with sections 735(d) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.210(c).

    Dated: April 9, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I

Scope of the Investigation

    The scope of this investigation covers cold-drawn mechanical 
tubing of carbon and alloy steel (cold-drawn mechanical tubing) of 
circular cross-section, 304.8 mm or more in length, in actual 
outside diameters less than 331mm, and regardless of wall thickness, 
surface finish, end finish or industry specification. The subject 
cold-drawn mechanical tubing is a tubular product with a circular 
cross-sectional shape that has been cold-drawn or otherwise cold-
finished after the initial tube formation in a manner that involves 
a change in the diameter or wall thickness of the tubing, or both. 
The subject cold-drawn mechanical tubing may be produced from either 
welded (e.g., electric resistance welded, continuous welded, etc.) 
or seamless (e.g., pierced, pilgered or extruded, etc.) carbon or 
alloy steel tubular products. It may also be heat treated after cold 
working. Such heat treatments may include, but are not limited to, 
annealing, normalizing, quenching and tempering, stress relieving or 
finish annealing. Typical cold-drawing methods for subject 
merchandise include, but are not limited to, drawing over mandrel, 
rod drawing, plug drawing, sink drawing and similar processes that 
involve reducing the outside diameter of the tubing with a die or 
similar device, whether or not controlling the inside diameter of 
the tubing with an internal support device such as a mandrel, rod, 
plug or similar device. Other cold-finishing operations that may be 
used to produce subject merchandise include cold-rolling and cold-
sizing the tubing.
    Subject cold-drawn mechanical tubing is typically certified to 
meet industry specifications for cold-drawn tubing including but not 
limited to:
    (1) American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) or 
American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) specifications ASTM 
A-512, ASTM A-513 Type 3 (ASME SA513 Type 3), ASTM A-513 Type 4 
(ASME SA513 Type 4), ASTM A-513 Type 5 (ASME SA513 Type 5), ASTM A-
513 Type 6 (ASME SA513 Type 6), ASTM A-519 (cold-finished);
    (2) SAE International (Society of Automotive Engineers) 
specifications SAE J524, SAE J525, SAE J2833, SAE J2614, SAE J2467, 
SAE J2435, SAE J2613;
    (3) Aerospace Material Specification (AMS) AMS T-6736 (AMS 
6736), AMS 6371, AMS 5050, AMS 5075, AMS 5062, AMS 6360, AMS 6361, 
AMS 6362, AMS 6371, AMS 6372, AMS 6374, AMS 6381, AMS 6415;
    (4) United States Military Standards (MIL) MIL-T-5066 and MIL-T-
6736;
    (5) foreign standards equivalent to one of the previously listed 
ASTM, ASME, SAE, AMS or MIL specifications including but not limited 
to:
    (a) German Institute for Standardization (DIN) specifications 
DIN 2391-2, DIN 2393-2, DIN 2394-2);
    (b) European Standards (EN) EN 10305-1, EN 10305-2, EN 10305-4, 
EN 10305-6 and European national variations on those standards 
(e.g., British Standard (BS EN), Irish Standard (IS EN) and German 
Standard (DIN EN) variations, etc.);
    (c) Japanese Industrial Standard (JIS) JIS G 3441 and JIS G 
3445; and
    (6) proprietary standards that are based on one of the above-
listed standards.
    The subject cold-drawn mechanical tubing may also be dual or 
multiple certified to more than one standard. Pipe that is multiple 
certified as cold-drawn mechanical tubing and to other 
specifications not covered by this scope, is also covered by the 
scope of this investigation when it meets the physical description 
set forth above.
    Steel products included in the scope of this investigation are 
products in which: (1) Iron predominates, by weight, over each of 
the other contained elements; and (2) the carbon content is 2 
percent or less by weight.
    For purposes of this scope, the place of cold-drawing determines 
the country of origin of the subject merchandise. Subject 
merchandise that is subject to minor working in a third country that 
occurs after drawing in one of the subject countries including, but 
not limited to, heat treatment, cutting to length, straightening, 
nondestruction testing, deburring or chamfering, remains within the 
scope of the investigation.
    All products that meet the written physical description are 
within the scope of this investigation unless specifically excluded 
or covered by the scope of an existing order. Merchandise that meets 
the physical description of cold-drawn mechanical tubing above is 
within the scope of the investigation even if it is also dual or 
multiple certified to an otherwise excluded specification listed 
below. The following products are outside of, and/or specifically 
excluded from, the scope of this investigation:
    (1) cold-drawn stainless steel tubing, containing 10.5 percent 
or more of chromium by weight and not more than 1.2 percent of 
carbon by weight;
    (2) products certified to one or more of the ASTM, ASME or 
American Petroleum Institute (API) specifications listed below:
     ASTM A-53;
     ASTM A-106;
     ASTM A-179 (ASME SA 179);
     ASTM A-192 (ASME SA 192);
     ASTM A-209 (ASME SA 209);
     ASTM A-210 (ASME SA 210);
     ASTM A-213 (ASME SA 213);
     ASTM A-334 (ASME SA 334);
     ASTM A-423 (ASME SA 423);
     ASTM A-498;
     ASTM A-496 (ASME SA 496);
     ASTM A-199;
     ASTM A-500;
     ASTM A-556;
     ASTM A-565;
     API 5L; and
     API 5CT

except that any cold-drawn tubing product certified to one of the 
above excluded specifications will not be excluded from the scope if 
it is also dual- or multiple-certified to any other specification 
that otherwise would fall within the scope of this investigation.
    The products subject to the investigation are currently 
classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
(HTSUS) under item numbers: 7304.31.3000, 7304.31.6050, 
7304.51.1000, 7304.51.5005, 7304.51.5060, 7306.30.5015, 
7306.30.5020, 7306.50.5030. Subject merchandise may also enter under 
numbers 7306.30.1000 and 7306.50.1000. The HTSUS subheadings above 
are provided for convenience and customs purposes only. The written 
description of the scope of the investigation is dispositive.

Appendix II

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Investigation
IV. Changes Since The Preliminary Determination
V. Discussion of the Issues
    Comment 1: Identification of Missing Information for Certain 
Benteler/BDI's U.S. and Home Market Sales
    Comment 2: Comparison of U.S. Sales of Cold-Drawn Mechanical 
Tubing With Home Market Sales of Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing
    Comment 3: Cash (Barverkauf) Sales
    Comment 4: Use of the Average-to-Average Methodology for 
Benteler/BDI's Margin Calculation
    Comment 5: Application of AFA to Salzgitter
    Comment 6: References to Appropriate Manufacturer
VI. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2018-07850 Filed 4-13-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P



                                                16326                          Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 73 / Monday, April 16, 2018 / Notices

                                                Appendix II                                             Background                                                 and (b) of the Act, Commerce continues
                                                List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and                 On November 22, 2017, Commerce                          to rely upon facts otherwise available,
                                                Decision Memorandum                                     published the Preliminary                                  with adverse inferences (AFA) in
                                                                                                        Determination of sales at LTFV of cold-                    determining the estimated weighted-
                                                1. Summary
                                                2. Background                                           drawn mechanical tubing from                               average dumping margins for Mubea
                                                3. Scope of the Order                                   Germany.1 Commerce invited comments                        Fahrwerksfedern GmbH (Mubea) and
                                                4. Discussion of the Issues                             from interested parties on the                             Salzgitter Mannesmann Line Pipe
                                                   Comment 1: Cancellation of Verification              Preliminary Determination.2 The                            GmbH (Salzgitter). Also, for certain
                                                     and Application of AFA Based on                    petitioners,3 Benteler Steel/Tube GmbH                     Benteler sales transactions, we relied
                                                     Unreliable Accounting Records for                  (Benteler), Salzgitter Mannesmann Line                     upon AFA and partial facts available,
                                                     Hongyi                                                                                                        with adverse inferences, pursuant to
                                                                                                        Pipe GmbH (Salzgitter), filed case 4 and
                                                   Comment 2: Hongyi’s Reporting of Steel                                                                          section 776(a) and (b) of the Act. For a
                                                     Grade                                              rebuttal briefs.5 Commerce exercised its
                                                                                                        discretion to toll deadlines affected by                   full description of the methodology
                                                   Comment 3: Rejection of Factual
                                                     Information in Hongyi’s Submissions                the closure of the Federal Government                      underlying the final determination, see
                                                   Comment 4: Critical Circumstances                    from January 20 through 22, 2018. The                      the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
                                                   Comment 5: Surrogate Country Selection               revised deadline for the final                                A complete summary of the events
                                                   Comment 6: Romanian Financial                        determination of this investigation is                     that occurred since Commerce
                                                     Statements Used in the Calculation of              now April 9, 2018.6                                        published the Preliminary
                                                     Surrogate Financial Ratios                            The participating mandatory                             Determination, as well as a full
                                                   Comment 7: Surrogate Used to Value                   respondent in this investigation is                        discussion of the issues raised by parties
                                                     Huacheng’s Seamless Tube Inputs                    Benteler. In addition, while two other                     for this final determination, may be
                                                   Comment 8: Whether to Adjust U.S. Price                                                                         found in the Issues and Decision
                                                                                                        respondents were selected as mandatory
                                                     for Market Economy Ocean Freight
                                                                                                        respondents, pursuant to sections 776(a)                   Memorandum.7
                                                     Expense
                                                   Comment 9: Other Issues
                                                                                                                                                                      The Issues and Decision
                                                5. Conclusion
                                                                                                           1 See Certain Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing of           Memorandum is a public document and
                                                                                                        Carbon and Alloy Steel from the Federal Republic           is available electronically via
                                                [FR Doc. 2018–07849 Filed 4–13–18; 8:45 am]             of Germany: Preliminary Affirmative Determination          Enforcement and Compliance’s
                                                BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P                                  of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement
                                                                                                        of Final Determination, 82 FR 55558 (November 22,          Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
                                                                                                        2017) (Preliminary Determination), and                     Centralized Electronic Service System
                                                                                                        accompanying Preliminary Issues and Decision               (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
                                                DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                  Memorandum (Preliminary Decision
                                                                                                        Memorandum).
                                                                                                                                                                   registered users at https://
                                                International Trade Administration                         2 See Preliminary Determination, 83 FR at 55559.        access.trade.gov and to all parties in the
                                                                                                           3 ArcelorMittal Tubular Products, Michigan              Central Records Unit, Room B–8024 of
                                                                                                        Seamless Tube, LLC, PTC Alliance Corp., Plymouth           Commerce’s main building. In addition,
                                                [A–428–845]                                             Tube Co. USA, Webco Industries, Inc., and                  a complete version of the Issues and
                                                                                                        Zekelman Industries, Inc. (collectively, the
                                                Certain Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing                    petitioners).
                                                                                                                                                                   Decision Memorandum can be accessed
                                                of Carbon and Alloy Steel From the                         4 See the petitioners’ Case Brief, ‘‘Petitioners’       at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
                                                Federal Republic of Germany: Final                      Case Brief,’’ dated March 9, 2018 (Petitioners’ Case       The signed Issues and Decision
                                                Affirmative Determination of Sales at
                                                                                                        Brief); Salzgitter’s Case Brief, ‘‘Antidumping Duty        Memorandum and electronic version are
                                                                                                        Investigation of Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing of
                                                Less Than Fair Value                                    Carbon and Alloy Steel from Federal Republic of
                                                                                                                                                                   identical in content.
                                                                                                        Germany: Case Brief,’’ dated March 9, 2018                 Scope of the Investigation
                                                AGENCY:   Enforcement and Compliance,                   (Salzgitter’s Case Brief); and Bentler’s Case Brief,
                                                International Trade Administration,                     ‘‘Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain Cold-             The product covered by this
                                                                                                        Drawn Mechanical Tubing of Carbon and Alloy                investigation is cold-drawn mechanical
                                                Department of Commerce.                                 Steel from Germany: Resubmission of Case Brief,’’
                                                                                                        dated March 27, 2018 (on March 26, 2018,                   tubing from Germany. In the
                                                SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
                                                                                                        Commece rejected and removed Benteler’s timely             Preliminary Determination, we set a
                                                (Commerce) determines that certain                      filed case brief, submitted on March 9, 2018, from         separate briefing schedule on scope
                                                cold-drawn mechanical tubing of carbon                  the record and Benteler refiled its case brief with        issues for interested parties.8 Certain
                                                and alloy steel (cold-drawn mechanical                  certain information redacted on March 27, 2018).
                                                                                                                                                                   interested parties commented on the
                                                tubing) from the Federal Republic of                       5 See the petitioners’ Rebuttal Brief, ‘‘Petitioners’

                                                                                                        Rebuttal Brief on Salzgitter,’’ dated March 14, 2018;      scope of the investigation as it appeared
                                                Germany (Germany) is being, or is likely                the petitioners’ Rebuttal Brief, ‘‘Petitioners’ Rebuttal   in the Preliminary Scope Decision
                                                to be, sold in the United States at less                Brief on Benteler Corrected,’’ dated March 27, 2018        Memorandum.9 On December 4, 2017,
                                                than fair value (LTFV). The final                       (on March 26, 2018, Commece rejected and
                                                estimated weighted-average dumping                      removed the petitioners’ timely filed rebuttal brief
                                                                                                                                                                     7 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
                                                                                                        on Benteler, submitted on March 14, 2018, from the
                                                margins of sales at LTFV are listed                     record and the petitioner refiled its rebuttal brief on    Memorandum for the Final Determination in the
                                                below in the section entitled ‘‘Final                   Benteler with certain information redacted on              Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain Cold-
                                                Determination.’’ The period of                          March 27, 2018); and Bentler’s Rebuttal Brief,             Drawn Mechanical Tubing of Carbon and Alloy
                                                                                                        ‘‘Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain Cold-          Steel from the Federal Republic of Germany,’’ dated
                                                investigation (POI) is April 1, 2016,                                                                              concurrently with this determination and hereby
                                                                                                        Drawn Mechanical Tubing of Carbon and Alloy
                                                through March 31, 2017.                                 Steel from Germany: Rebuttal Case Brief,’’ dated           adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision
                                                                                                        March 14, 2018.                                            Memorandum).
                                                DATES: Applicable April 16, 2018.                                                                                    8 See Preliminary Determination, 82 FR at 55559.
                                                                                                           6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Deadlines Affected by the
                                                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                        Shutdown of the Federal Government,’’ dated                The scope case briefs were due five days after the
srobinson on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES




                                                Frances Veith, AD/CVD Operations,                       January 23, 2018. All deadlines in this segment of         publication of the preliminary less than fair value
                                                                                                        the proceeding have been extended by 3 days. If the        determinations for China, Germany, India, Italy,
                                                Office III, Enforcement and Compliance,                                                                            Korea, and Switzerland in the Federal Register, and
                                                                                                        new deadline falls on a non-business day, in
                                                International Trade Administration,                     accordance with Commerce’s practice, the deadline          the rebuttal briefs were due three days after the due
                                                U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401                       will become the next business day. See Notice of           date for the scope case briefs, i.e., Monday,
                                                Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,                     Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next Business Day’’        November 27, 2017 and Thursday, November 30,
                                                                                                        Rule for Administrative Determination Deadlines            2017.
                                                DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4295.                                                                                 9 See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Cold-Drawn
                                                                                                        Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, as Amended, 70
                                                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                              FR 24533 (May 10, 2005).                                   Mechanical Tubing of Carbon and Alloy Steel from



                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   19:42 Apr 13, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00042   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM       16APN1


                                                                                           Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 73 / Monday, April 16, 2018 / Notices                                                                                              16327

                                                the petitioners withdrew a portion of                                       production records, and original source                                      ‘‘Margin Calculations’’ section of the
                                                their comments regarding the scope                                          documents provided by the respondent.                                        Issues and Decision Memorandum.
                                                language.10 Commerce addressed all
                                                                                                                            Analysis of Comments Received                                                All-Others Rate
                                                scope comments received in the Final
                                                Scope Decision Memorandum and made                                              All issues raised in the case briefs and                                    Commerce calculated an individual
                                                changes to the scope that appeared in                                       rebuttal briefs submitted by interested                                      estimated weighted-average dumping
                                                the Preliminary Determination.11 For                                        parties in this proceeding are discussed                                     margin for Benteler, the only
                                                the full scope of this investigation, see                                   in the Issues and Decision                                                   individually examined exporter/
                                                the scope in Appendix I to this notice.                                     Memorandum. A list of the issues raised                                      producer that is participating in this
                                                                                                                            by parties and responded to by                                               investigation. Because the only
                                                Period of Investigation                                                     Commerce in the Issues and Decision                                          individually calculated dumping margin
                                                 The POI is April 1, 2016, through                                          Memorandum is attached at Appendix                                           is not zero, de minimis, or based
                                                March 31, 2017.                                                             II.                                                                          entirely on facts otherwise available, the
                                                                                                                                                                                                         estimated weighted-average dumping
                                                Verification                                                                Changes Since the Preliminary
                                                                                                                                                                                                         margin calculated for Benteler is the
                                                   As provided in section 782(i) of the                                     Determination
                                                                                                                                                                                                         margin assigned to all-other producers
                                                Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),                                     Based on our analysis of the                                               and exporters, pursuant to section
                                                Commerce verified the sales and cost                                        comments received and our findings at                                        735(c)(5)(A) of the Act.
                                                data reported by Benteler for use in our                                    verification, we made certain changes to
                                                final determination. We used standard                                       the margin calculations for Benteler                                         Final Determination Margins
                                                verification procedures, including an                                       since the Preliminary Determination.                                          The weighted-average dumping
                                                examination of relevant accounting and                                      These changes are discussed in the                                           margins are as follows:

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           Estimated
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           weighted-
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            average
                                                                                                                                      Exporter/producer                                                                                                    dumping
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            margin
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           (percent)

                                                BENTELER Steel/Tube GmbH/BENTELER Distribution International GmbH 12 ................................................................................                                                             3.11
                                                Mubea Fahrwerksfedern GmbH ..........................................................................................................................................................                           209.06
                                                Salzgitter Mannesmann Line Pipe GmbH ...........................................................................................................................................                                209.06
                                                All-Others .............................................................................................................................................................................................          3.11
                                                  12 In the Preliminary Determination, Commerce found that BENTELER Steel/Tube GmbH and BENTELER Distribution International GmbH are
                                                a single entity and, because there were no changes to the facts which supported that decision, since that determination was made, we continue
                                                to find that these companies are part of a single entity for this final determination. See also Preliminary Decision Memorandum.


                                                Disclosure                                                                  value exceeds the U.S. price as shown                                        International Trade Commission
                                                                                                                            above.                                                                       Notification
                                                  We will disclose the calculations
                                                performed within five days of any                                             Pursuant to section 735(c)(1)(B)(ii) of                                       In accordance with section 735(d) of
                                                public announcement of this notice in                                       the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(d),                                               the Act, we will notify the International
                                                accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).                                          Commerce will instruct CBP to require                                        Trade Commission (ITC) of the final
                                                                                                                            a cash deposit for such entries of                                           affirmative determination of sales at
                                                Continuation of Suspension of                                               merchandise equal to the estimated                                           LTFV. Because the final determination
                                                Liquidation                                                                 weighted-average dumping margin or                                           in this proceeding is affirmative, in
                                                                                                                            the estimated all-others rate, as follows:                                   accordance with section 735(b)(2) of the
                                                   In accordance with section                                               (1) The cash deposit rate for the                                            Act, the ITC will make its final
                                                735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, we will instruct                                   respondents listed above will be equal                                       determination as to whether the
                                                U.S. Customs and Border Protection                                          to the respondent-specific estimated                                         domestic industry in the United States
                                                (CBP) to continue the suspension of                                         weighted-average dumping margin                                              is materially injured, or threatened with
                                                liquidation of all appropriate entries of                                   determined in this final determination;                                      material injury, by reason of imports, or
                                                cold-drawn mechanical tubing from                                           (2) if the exporter is not a respondent                                      sales (or the likelihood of sales) for
                                                Germany, as described in Appendix I of                                      identified above but the producer is,                                        importation of cold-drawn mechanical
                                                this notice, which were entered, or                                         then the cash deposit rate will be equal                                     tubing from Germany no later than 45
                                                withdrawn from warehouse, for                                               to the respondent-specific estimated                                         days after our final determination. If the
                                                consumption on or after November 22,                                        weighted-average dumping margin                                              ITC determines that material injury or
                                                2017, the date of publication of the                                        established for that producer of the                                         threat of material injury does not exist,
                                                Preliminary Determination of this                                           subject merchandise; and (3) the cash                                        the proceeding will be terminated and
                                                investigation in the Federal Register.                                      deposit rate for all other producers and                                     all cash deposits will be refunded. If the
                                                Further, Commerce will instruct CBP to                                      exporters will be equal to the all-others                                    ITC determines that such injury does
                                                require a cash deposit equal to the                                         estimated weighted-average dumping                                           exist, Commerce will issue an
srobinson on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES




                                                estimated amount by which the normal                                        margin.                                                                      antidumping duty order directing CBP

                                                the Federal Republic of Germany, India, Italy, the                            10 See the petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Certain Cold-                            Republic of Korea, the People’s Republic of China,
                                                Republic of Korea, the People’s Republic of China,                          Drawn Mechanical Tubing from Germany et al.—                                 and Switzerland: Scope Comments Decision
                                                and Switzerland: Scope Comments Decision                                    EN–10305–3,’’ dated December 4, 2017.                                        Memorandum for the Final Determinations,’’ dated
                                                Memorandum for the Preliminary Determinations,’’                              11 See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Cold-Drawn
                                                                                                                                                                                                         December 4, 2017 (Final Scope Decision
                                                dated November 15, 2017 (Preliminary Scope                                  Mechanical Tubing of Carbon and Alloy Steel from                             Memorandum).
                                                Decision Memorandum).                                                       the Federal Republic of Germany, India, Italy, the



                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014         21:23 Apr 13, 2018          Jkt 244001      PO 00000        Frm 00043        Fmt 4703       Sfmt 4703       E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM               16APN1


                                                16328                          Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 73 / Monday, April 16, 2018 / Notices

                                                to assess, upon further instruction by                  produce subject merchandise include cold-                (1) cold-drawn stainless steel tubing,
                                                Commerce, antidumping duties on all                     rolling and cold-sizing the tubing.                   containing 10.5 percent or more of chromium
                                                imports of the subject merchandise                         Subject cold-drawn mechanical tubing is            by weight and not more than 1.2 percent of
                                                                                                        typically certified to meet industry                  carbon by weight;
                                                entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,                   specifications for cold-drawn tubing
                                                for consumption on or after the effective                                                                        (2) products certified to one or more of the
                                                                                                        including but not limited to:                         ASTM, ASME or American Petroleum
                                                date of the suspension of liquidation.                     (1) American Society for Testing and               Institute (API) specifications listed below:
                                                                                                        Materials (ASTM) or American Society of
                                                Notification Regarding Administrative                                                                            • ASTM A–53;
                                                                                                        Mechanical Engineers (ASME) specifications
                                                Protective Orders                                                                                                • ASTM A–106;
                                                                                                        ASTM A–512, ASTM A–513 Type 3 (ASME
                                                                                                        SA513 Type 3), ASTM A–513 Type 4 (ASME                   • ASTM A–179 (ASME SA 179);
                                                  This notice serves as the only
                                                                                                        SA513 Type 4), ASTM A–513 Type 5 (ASME                   • ASTM A–192 (ASME SA 192);
                                                reminder to parties subject to an                                                                                • ASTM A–209 (ASME SA 209);
                                                administrative protective order (APO) of                SA513 Type 5), ASTM A–513 Type 6 (ASME
                                                                                                        SA513 Type 6), ASTM A–519 (cold-finished);               • ASTM A–210 (ASME SA 210);
                                                their responsibility concerning the                        (2) SAE International (Society of                     • ASTM A–213 (ASME SA 213);
                                                disposition of proprietary information                  Automotive Engineers) specifications SAE                 • ASTM A–334 (ASME SA 334);
                                                disclosed under APO in accordance                       J524, SAE J525, SAE J2833, SAE J2614, SAE                • ASTM A–423 (ASME SA 423);
                                                with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely                       J2467, SAE J2435, SAE J2613;                             • ASTM A–498;
                                                notification of the return or destruction                  (3) Aerospace Material Specification (AMS)            • ASTM A–496 (ASME SA 496);
                                                of APO materials or conversion to                       AMS T–6736 (AMS 6736), AMS 6371, AMS                     • ASTM A–199;
                                                judicial protective order is hereby                     5050, AMS 5075, AMS 5062, AMS 6360,                      • ASTM A–500;
                                                                                                        AMS 6361, AMS 6362, AMS 6371, AMS                        • ASTM A–556;
                                                requested. Failure to comply with the                   6372, AMS 6374, AMS 6381, AMS 6415;
                                                regulations and the terms of an APO is                                                                           • ASTM A–565;
                                                                                                           (4) United States Military Standards (MIL)            • API 5L; and
                                                a violation subject to sanction.                        MIL–T–5066 and MIL–T–6736;
                                                                                                                                                                 • API 5CT
                                                                                                           (5) foreign standards equivalent to one of
                                                Notification to Interested Parties                                                                            except that any cold-drawn tubing product
                                                                                                        the previously listed ASTM, ASME, SAE,
                                                  We are issuing and publishing this                    AMS or MIL specifications including but not           certified to one of the above excluded
                                                determination and notice in accordance                  limited to:                                           specifications will not be excluded from the
                                                with sections 735(d) and 777(i) of the                     (a) German Institute for Standardization           scope if it is also dual- or multiple-certified
                                                Act and 19 CFR 351.210(c).                              (DIN) specifications DIN 2391–2, DIN 2393–            to any other specification that otherwise
                                                                                                        2, DIN 2394–2);                                       would fall within the scope of this
                                                  Dated: April 9, 2018.                                    (b) European Standards (EN) EN 10305–1,            investigation.
                                                Gary Taverman,                                          EN 10305–2, EN 10305–4, EN 10305–6 and                   The products subject to the investigation
                                                Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping              European national variations on those                 are currently classified in the Harmonized
                                                and Countervailing Duty Operations,                     standards (e.g., British Standard (BS EN),            Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
                                                performing the non-exclusive functions and              Irish Standard (IS EN) and German Standard            under item numbers: 7304.31.3000,
                                                duties of the Assistant Secretary for                   (DIN EN) variations, etc.);                           7304.31.6050, 7304.51.1000, 7304.51.5005,
                                                Enforcement and Compliance.                                (c) Japanese Industrial Standard (JIS) JIS G       7304.51.5060, 7306.30.5015, 7306.30.5020,
                                                                                                        3441 and JIS G 3445; and                              7306.50.5030. Subject merchandise may also
                                                Appendix I                                                 (6) proprietary standards that are based on
                                                                                                                                                              enter under numbers 7306.30.1000 and
                                                                                                        one of the above-listed standards.
                                                Scope of the Investigation                                                                                    7306.50.1000. The HTSUS subheadings
                                                                                                           The subject cold-drawn mechanical tubing
                                                  The scope of this investigation covers cold-          may also be dual or multiple certified to             above are provided for convenience and
                                                drawn mechanical tubing of carbon and alloy             more than one standard. Pipe that is multiple         customs purposes only. The written
                                                steel (cold-drawn mechanical tubing) of                 certified as cold-drawn mechanical tubing             description of the scope of the investigation
                                                circular cross-section, 304.8 mm or more in             and to other specifications not covered by            is dispositive.
                                                length, in actual outside diameters less than           this scope, is also covered by the scope of
                                                331mm, and regardless of wall thickness,
                                                                                                                                                              Appendix II
                                                                                                        this investigation when it meets the physical
                                                surface finish, end finish or industry                  description set forth above.                          List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
                                                specification. The subject cold-drawn                      Steel products included in the scope of this       Decision Memorandum
                                                mechanical tubing is a tubular product with             investigation are products in which: (1) Iron
                                                                                                                                                              I. Summary
                                                a circular cross-sectional shape that has been          predominates, by weight, over each of the
                                                cold-drawn or otherwise cold-finished after                                                                   II. Background
                                                                                                        other contained elements; and (2) the carbon
                                                the initial tube formation in a manner that                                                                   III. Scope of the Investigation
                                                                                                        content is 2 percent or less by weight.
                                                involves a change in the diameter or wall                  For purposes of this scope, the place of           IV. Changes Since The Preliminary
                                                thickness of the tubing, or both. The subject           cold-drawing determines the country of                      Determination
                                                cold-drawn mechanical tubing may be                     origin of the subject merchandise. Subject            V. Discussion of the Issues
                                                produced from either welded (e.g., electric             merchandise that is subject to minor working             Comment 1: Identification of Missing
                                                resistance welded, continuous welded, etc.)             in a third country that occurs after drawing                Information for Certain Benteler/BDI’s
                                                or seamless (e.g., pierced, pilgered or                 in one of the subject countries including, but              U.S. and Home Market Sales
                                                extruded, etc.) carbon or alloy steel tubular           not limited to, heat treatment, cutting to               Comment 2: Comparison of U.S. Sales of
                                                products. It may also be heat treated after             length, straightening, nondestruction testing,              Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing With
                                                cold working. Such heat treatments may                  deburring or chamfering, remains within the                 Home Market Sales of Cold-Drawn
                                                include, but are not limited to, annealing,             scope of the investigation.                                 Mechanical Tubing
                                                normalizing, quenching and tempering, stress               All products that meet the written physical           Comment 3: Cash (Barverkauf) Sales
                                                relieving or finish annealing. Typical cold-            description are within the scope of this                 Comment 4: Use of the Average-to-Average
                                                drawing methods for subject merchandise                 investigation unless specifically excluded or               Methodology for Benteler/BDI’s Margin
                                                include, but are not limited to, drawing over           covered by the scope of an existing order.                  Calculation
srobinson on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES




                                                mandrel, rod drawing, plug drawing, sink                Merchandise that meets the physical                      Comment 5: Application of AFA to
                                                drawing and similar processes that involve              description of cold-drawn mechanical tubing                 Salzgitter
                                                reducing the outside diameter of the tubing             above is within the scope of the investigation           Comment 6: References to Appropriate
                                                with a die or similar device, whether or not            even if it is also dual or multiple certified to            Manufacturer
                                                controlling the inside diameter of the tubing           an otherwise excluded specification listed            VI. Recommendation
                                                with an internal support device such as a               below. The following products are outside of,
                                                mandrel, rod, plug or similar device. Other             and/or specifically excluded from, the scope          [FR Doc. 2018–07850 Filed 4–13–18; 8:45 am]
                                                cold-finishing operations that may be used to           of this investigation:                                BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P




                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   19:42 Apr 13, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00044   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM   16APN1



Document Created: 2018-04-14 02:19:01
Document Modified: 2018-04-14 02:19:01
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesApplicable April 16, 2018.
ContactFrances Veith, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4295.
FR Citation83 FR 16326 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR