83 FR 16832 - Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 74 (April 17, 2018)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 74 (April 17, 2018)
| Page Range | 16832-16833 | |
| FR Document | 2018-07993 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 17, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 16832-16833] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-07993] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-201-830] Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V. (Deacero), a producer and exporter of carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod (wire rod) from Mexico, made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR), October 1, 2015, through September 30, 2016. We also find that ArcelorMittal las Truchas, S.A. de C.V. (AMLT) made no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. DATES: Applicable April 17, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keith Haynes, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5139. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Commerce published the preliminary results of this administrative review of wire rod from Mexico on November 8, 2017.\1\ We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. On December 8, 2017, Commerce received timely filed case briefs from Deacero, and Nucor Corporation (Nucor).\2\ On December 20, 2017, Commerce received timely filed rebuttal briefs from both Deacero and Nucor. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico: Preliminary Results and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2015-2016, 82 FR 51819 (November 8, 2017) (Preliminary Results). \2\ See Deacero's Case Brief, ``Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico--Case Brief,'' dated December 8, 2017 (Deacero's Case Brief); the Nucor's Case Brief, ``Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico: Case Brief,'' dated December 8, 2017 (Nucor's Case Brief). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Commerce has exercised its discretion to toll all deadlines affected by the duration of the closure of the Federal Government from January 20 through 22, 2018.\3\ Additionally, on February 27, 2018, Commerce postponed the final results of this review by 30 days until April 11, 2018.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Memorandum for The Record from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ``Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the Federal Government'' (Tolling Memorandum), dated January 23, 2018. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding affected by the closure of the Federal Government have been extended by 3 days. \4\ See Commerce Letter re: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016, dated February 27, 2018. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Based on an analysis of the comments received, Commerce has made changes to the calculated weighted-average dumping margin determined for Deacero. Commerce has listed the final calculated weighted-average dumping margin in the ``Final Results of Administrative Review'' section below. Scope of the Order \5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ For the full text of the scope of the order, see Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2015- 2016 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico,'' dated concurrently with this determination and hereby adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The product covered by the order is wire rod, in coils, of approximately round cross section, 5.00 mm or more, but less than 19.00 mm, in solid cross-sectional diameter.\6\ The subject merchandise is currently classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings: 7213.91.3000, 7213.91.3010, 7213.91.3011, 7213.91.3015, 7213.91.3020, 7213.91.3090, 7213.91.3091, 7213.91.3092, 7213.91.3093, 7213.91.4500, 7213.91.4510, 7213.91.4590, 7213.91.6000, 7213.91.6010, 7213.91.6090, 7213.99.0030, 7213.99.0031, 7213.99.0038, 7213.99.0090, 7227.20.0000, 7227.20.0010, 7227.20.0020, 7227.20.0030, 7227.20.0080, 7227.20.0090, 7227.20.0095, 7227.90.6010, 7227.90.6020, 7227.90.6030, 7227.90.6035, 7227.90.6050, 7227.90.6051, 7227.90.6053, 7227.90.6058, 7227.90.6059, 7227.90.6080, and 7227.90.6085. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes only; the written product description remains dispositive. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ On October 1, 2012, Commerce determined that Deacero's shipments to the United States of narrow gauge wire rod (4.75 mm to 5.00 mm) (narrow gauge wire rod) constitute merchandise altered in form or appearance in such minor respects that it should be included within the scope of the order on wire rod from Mexico. See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico: Affirmative Final Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping Order, 77 FR 59892 (October 1, 2012) and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld this determination. See Deacero S.A. de C.V. v. United States, 817 F.3d 1332, 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2016). Because there were no changes to the facts which supported that decision since that determination, we continue to find Deacero's narrow gauge wire rod (4.75 mm to 5.00 mm) subject merchandise. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Analysis of Comments Received Commerce has addressed the issues raised by Deacero and Nucor in their case and rebuttal briefs in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Commerce has identified and listed these issues in the Appendix to this notice. Because the Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document, parties can find a complete discussion of these issues and the corresponding recommendations filed electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. Additionally, parties can access a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum directly on the internet at http://trade.gov/enforcement/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on the case brief and rebuttal comments received from Deacero and Nucor, we made changes to our rate calculation for Deacero. For a discussion of these issues, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Final Determination of No Shipments In the Preliminary Results, we preliminarily found that AMLT had no [[Page 16833]] shipments during the POR.\7\ Because there has not been any contradictory information added to the record of this review since the Preliminary Results, based on record evidence, Commerce continues to find that AMLT did not ship subject merchandise during the POR. Accordingly, consistent with Commerce's practice, we intend to instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate any existing entries of subject merchandise made during the POR that were produced by AMLT, but exported by other parties without their own rate, at the all-others rate effective during the POR.\8\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See Preliminary Results, 82 FR at 51819-20. \8\ See, e.g., Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 26922, 26923 (May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010). See also Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Results of Administrative Review Commerce finds that the following estimated weighted-average dumping margin exists during the POR, as referenced below: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Producer/exporter dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V..................................... 12.57 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Assessment and Cash Deposit Requirements In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Commerce intends to issue appropriate instructions to CBP 41 days after publication of the final results of this review.\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See 19 CFR 356.8(a). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Deacero, because its weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), Commerce has calculated importer-specific antidumping duty assessment rates. We calculated importer-specific ad valorem antidumping duty assessment rates by aggregating the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales of each importer and dividing each of these amounts by the total entered value associated with those sales. We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review where an importer-specific assessment rate is not zero or de minimis. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to liquidate without regard to antidumping duties any entries for which the importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis. As noted in the ``Final Determination of No Shipments'' section, above, Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate any existing entries of merchandise produced by AMLT but exported by other parties, at the rate for the intermediate reseller, if available, or at the all-others rate. The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Deacero will be the rate established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by producers or exporters not covered in this administrative review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation, but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producer or exporters will continue to be 20.11 percent, the all-others rate established in the investigation.\10\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine, 67 FR 65945 (October 29, 2002). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties has occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. These final results are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: April 11, 2018. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix--Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Analysis of Comments Comment 1: Whether Deacero's Reported Billet Cost Data Are Reliable Comment 2: Whether to Cap Deacero's Freight Revenue by its Freight Cost Comment 3: Whether to Rely on a Different Cost of Production (COP) Database Comment 4: Treatment of Certain Mixed Currency Variables Within the Margin Program Comment 5: Treatment of Certain Commissions Within the Margin Program V. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2018-07993 Filed 4-16-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![16832 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 74 / Tuesday, April 17, 2018 / Notices
C. The Government Control of GTC’s December 8, 2017, Commerce received merchandise is currently classifiable
Export Activities timely filed case briefs from Deacero, under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule
D. WTO Obligations and Nucor Corporation (Nucor).2 On of the United States (HTSUS)
E. A New China-Wide Rate Applicable to
December 20, 2017, Commerce received subheadings: 7213.91.3000,
GTC
F. Adjustments for Domestic and Export timely filed rebuttal briefs from both 7213.91.3010, 7213.91.3011,
Subsidies Found in the Parallel CVD Deacero and Nucor. 7213.91.3015, 7213.91.3020,
Review Commerce has exercised its discretion 7213.91.3090, 7213.91.3091,
Comment 3: Surrogate Value for Mixed to toll all deadlines affected by the 7213.91.3092, 7213.91.3093,
Rubber duration of the closure of the Federal 7213.91.4500, 7213.91.4510,
Comment 4: Overhead and Selling, General Government from January 20 through 7213.91.4590, 7213.91.6000,
and Administrative Expenses (SG&A) 22, 2018.3 Additionally, on February 27, 7213.91.6010, 7213.91.6090,
Ratios Used to Calculate Zhongwei’s 2018, Commerce postponed the final
Margin 7213.99.0030, 7213.99.0031,
results of this review by 30 days until 7213.99.0038, 7213.99.0090,
Comment 5: CVD Rates Used to Calculate
April 11, 2018.4 7227.20.0000, 7227.20.0010,
Double-Remedies Adjustment for
Zhongwei
Based on an analysis of the comments 7227.20.0020, 7227.20.0030,
Comment 6: Irrecoverable Value-Added received, Commerce has made changes 7227.20.0080, 7227.20.0090,
Tax (VAT) Rate for Zhongwei to the calculated weighted-average 7227.20.0095, 7227.90.6010,
VI. Recommendation dumping margin determined for 7227.90.6020, 7227.90.6030,
[FR Doc. 2018–07991 Filed 4–16–18; 8:45 am]
Deacero. Commerce has listed the final 7227.90.6035, 7227.90.6050,
calculated weighted-average dumping 7227.90.6051, 7227.90.6053,
BILLING CODE P
margin in the ‘‘Final Results of 7227.90.6058, 7227.90.6059,
Administrative Review’’ section below. 7227.90.6080, and 7227.90.6085. The
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Scope of the Order 5 HTSUS subheadings are provided for
The product covered by the order is convenience and customs purposes
International Trade Administration only; the written product description
wire rod, in coils, of approximately
[A–201–830] round cross section, 5.00 mm or more, remains dispositive.
but less than 19.00 mm, in solid cross- Analysis of Comments Received
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire sectional diameter.6 The subject
Rod From Mexico: Final Results of Commerce has addressed the issues
Antidumping Duty Administrative 2 See Deacero’s Case Brief, ‘‘Carbon and Certain raised by Deacero and Nucor in their
Review and Final Determination of No Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico—Case Brief,’’ case and rebuttal briefs in the Issues and
Shipments; 2015–2016 dated December 8, 2017 (Deacero’s Case Brief); the
Decision Memorandum. Commerce has
Nucor’s Case Brief, ‘‘Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Wire Rod from Mexico: Case Brief,’’ dated identified and listed these issues in the
International Trade Administration, December 8, 2017 (Nucor’s Case Brief). Appendix to this notice. Because the
3 See Memorandum for The Record from
Department of Commerce. Issues and Decision Memorandum is a
Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Enforcement and Compliance, performing the non- public document, parties can find a
(Commerce) finds that Deacero S.A.P.I. exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant complete discussion of these issues and
de C.V. (Deacero), a producer and Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, the corresponding recommendations
‘‘Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the
exporter of carbon and certain alloy Federal Government’’ (Tolling Memorandum),
filed electronically via Enforcement and
steel wire rod (wire rod) from Mexico, dated January 23, 2018. All deadlines in this Compliance’s Antidumping and
made sales of subject merchandise at segment of the proceeding affected by the closure Countervailing Duty Centralized
of the Federal Government have been extended by Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
less than normal value (NV) during the 3 days.
period of review (POR), October 1, 2015, 4 See Commerce Letter re: Carbon and Certain
ACCESS is available to registered users
through September 30, 2016. We also Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico: Extension of at https://access.trade.gov and in the
find that ArcelorMittal las Truchas, S.A. Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the
Administrative Review; 2015–2016, dated February main Department of Commerce
de C.V. (AMLT) made no shipments of 27, 2018.
subject merchandise during the POR. 5 For the full text of the scope of the order, see
building. Additionally, parties can
DATES: Applicable April 17, 2018. Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum access a complete version of the Issues
for the Final Results of the 2015–2016 Antidumping and Decision Memorandum directly on
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Duty Administrative Review: Carbon and Certain the internet at http://trade.gov/
Keith Haynes, AD/CVD Operations, Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico,’’ dated
concurrently with this determination and hereby enforcement/frn/index.html. The signed
Office III, Enforcement and Compliance,
adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision Issues and Decision Memorandum and
International Trade Administration, Memorandum). electronic versions of the Issues and
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 6 On October 1, 2012, Commerce determined that
Decision Memorandum are identical in
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, Deacero’s shipments to the United States of narrow
gauge wire rod (4.75 mm to 5.00 mm) (narrow gauge content.
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5139.
wire rod) constitute merchandise altered in form or
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: appearance in such minor respects that it should be Changes Since the Preliminary Results
included within the scope of the order on wire rod
Background from Mexico. See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Based on the case brief and rebuttal
Commerce published the preliminary Wire Rod from Mexico: Affirmative Final comments received from Deacero and
Determination of Circumvention of the Nucor, we made changes to our rate
results of this administrative review of Antidumping Order, 77 FR 59892 (October 1, 2012)
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
wire rod from Mexico on November 8, and accompanying Issues and Decision calculation for Deacero. For a discussion
2017.1 We invited interested parties to Memorandum. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the of these issues, see the Issues and
comment on the Preliminary Results. On Federal Circuit upheld this determination. See Decision Memorandum.
Deacero S.A. de C.V. v. United States, 817 F.3d
1332, 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2016). Because there were no Final Determination of No Shipments
1 See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod
changes to the facts which supported that decision
from Mexico: Preliminary Results and Preliminary since that determination, we continue to find
Determination of No Shipments; 2015–2016, 82 FR Deacero’s narrow gauge wire rod (4.75 mm to 5.00
In the Preliminary Results, we
51819 (November 8, 2017) (Preliminary Results). mm) subject merchandise. preliminarily found that AMLT had no
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:20 Apr 16, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17APN1.SGM 17APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_16906/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 74 / Tuesday, April 17, 2018 / Notices 16833
shipments during the POR.7 Because importer-specific assessment rate is zero information disclosed under APO in
there has not been any contradictory or de minimis. accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3),
information added to the record of this As noted in the ‘‘Final Determination which continues to govern business
review since the Preliminary Results, of No Shipments’’ section, above, proprietary information in this segment
based on record evidence, Commerce Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate of proceeding. Timely written
continues to find that AMLT did not any existing entries of merchandise notification of the return/destruction of
ship subject merchandise during the produced by AMLT but exported by APO materials or conversion to judicial
POR. Accordingly, consistent with other parties, at the rate for the protective order is hereby requested.
Commerce’s practice, we intend to intermediate reseller, if available, or at Failure to comply with the regulations
instruct U.S. Customs and Border the all-others rate. and terms of an APO is a violation
Protection (CBP) to liquidate any The following cash deposit which is subject to sanction.
existing entries of subject merchandise requirements will be effective upon These final results are issued and
made during the POR that were publication of the notice of final results published in accordance with sections
produced by AMLT, but exported by of administrative review for all 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
other parties without their own rate, at shipments of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, Dated: April 11, 2018.
the all-others rate effective during the Gary Taverman,
POR.8 for consumption on or after the
publication of the final results of this Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
Final Results of Administrative Review administrative review, as provided by and Countervailing Duty Operations,
section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash performing the non-exclusive functions and
Commerce finds that the following duties of the Assistant Secretary for
estimated weighted-average dumping deposit rate for Deacero will be the rate
Enforcement and Compliance.
margin exists during the POR, as established in the final results of this
referenced below: administrative review; (2) for Appendix—Issues and Decision
merchandise exported by producers or Memorandum
Weighted- exporters not covered in this I. Summary
average administrative review but covered in a II. Background
Producer/exporter dumping prior segment of the proceeding, the
margin III. Scope of the Order
(percent) cash deposit rate will continue to be the IV. Analysis of Comments
company-specific rate published for the Comment 1: Whether Deacero’s Reported
Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V ............ 12.57 most recent period; (3) if the exporter is Billet Cost Data Are Reliable
not a firm covered in this review, a prior Comment 2: Whether to Cap Deacero’s
Assessment and Cash Deposit review, or the original investigation, but Freight Revenue by its Freight Cost
the producer is, the cash deposit rate Comment 3: Whether to Rely on a Different
Requirements Cost of Production (COP) Database
will be the rate established for the most
In accordance with 19 CFR Comment 4: Treatment of Certain Mixed
recent period for the producer of the Currency Variables Within the Margin
351.212(b)(1), Commerce intends to merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit
issue appropriate instructions to CBP 41 Program
rate for all other producer or exporters Comment 5: Treatment of Certain
days after publication of the final results will continue to be 20.11 percent, the Commissions Within the Margin
of this review.9 all-others rate established in the Program
For Deacero, because its weighted-
investigation.10 These cash deposit V. Recommendation
average dumping margin is not zero or requirements, when imposed, shall [FR Doc. 2018–07993 Filed 4–16–18; 8:45 am]
de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), remain in effect until further notice.
Commerce has calculated importer- BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
specific antidumping duty assessment Notification to Importers
rates. We calculated importer-specific This notice also serves as a final
ad valorem antidumping duty DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
reminder to importers of their
assessment rates by aggregating the total responsibility under 19 CFR United States Patent and Trademark
amount of dumping calculated for the 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate Office
examined sales of each importer and regarding the reimbursement of
dividing each of these amounts by the antidumping duties prior to liquidation Submission for OMB Review;
total entered value associated with those of the relevant entries during this POR. Comment Request; ‘‘Public Key
sales. We will instruct CBP to assess Failure to comply with this requirement Infrastructure (PKI) Certificate Action
antidumping duties on all appropriate could result in Commerce’s Form’’
entries covered by this review where an presumption that reimbursement of
importer-specific assessment rate is not antidumping duties has occurred and The United States Patent and
zero or de minimis. Pursuant to 19 CFR the subsequent assessment of doubled Trademark Office (USPTO) will submit
351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to antidumping duties. to the Office of Management and Budget
liquidate without regard to antidumping (OMB) for clearance the following
duties any entries for which the Administrative Protective Order proposals for collection of information
This notice also serves as a final under the provisions of the Paperwork
7 See Preliminary Results, 82 FR at 51819–20. reminder to parties subject to an Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
8 See, e.g., Magnesium Metal from the Russian administrative protective order (APO) of Agency: United States Patent and
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Trademark Office, Commerce.
Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 26922, 26923
their responsibility concerning the
(May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal return or destruction of proprietary Title: Public Key Infrastructure (PKI)
from the Russian Federation: Final Results of Certificate Action Form.
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 10 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: OMB Control Number: 0651–0045.
56989 (September 17, 2010). See also Antidumping Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Form Number(s):
and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, Trinidad and
of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). Tobago, and Ukraine, 67 FR 65945 (October 29, • PTO–2042
9 See 19 CFR 356.8(a). 2002). Type of Request: Regular.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:20 Apr 16, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17APN1.SGM 17APN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_16906/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2018-04-17 02:51:38
Document Modified: 2018-04-17 02:51:38
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable April 17, 2018. | |
| Contact | Keith Haynes, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5139. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 16832 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR