83 FR 17121 - Safety Zone for Fireworks Display; Upper Potomac River, Washington Channel, Washington, DC
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 75 (April 18, 2018)
Coast Guard
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 75 (April 18, 2018)
| Page Range | 17121-17123 | |
| FR Document | 2018-08091 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 75 (Wednesday, April 18, 2018)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 17121-17123] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-08091] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 165 [Docket Number USCG-2018-0215] RIN 1625-AA00 Safety Zone for Fireworks Display; Upper Potomac River, Washington Channel, Washington, DC AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a safety zone for certain waters of the Upper Potomac River. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on navigable waters during a fireworks display in the Washington Channel at Washington, DC on May 10, 2018. This proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from entering the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Maryland-National Capital Region or a designated representative. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking. DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before May 2, 2018. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG- 2018-0215 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further instructions on submitting comments. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this proposed rulemaking, call or email Mr. Ronald Houck, Sector Maryland- National Capital Region Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 410-576-2674, email Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Table of Abbreviations CFR Code of Federal Regulations COTP Captain of the Port DHS Department of Homeland Security FR Federal Register NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking Sec. Section U.S.C. United States Code II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis On February 27, 2018, The Wharf DC of Washington, DC notified the Coast Guard that it will be conducting a fireworks display on May 10, 2018, at 9 p.m. Details of the event were provided to the Coast Guard by the event sponsor on March 23, 2018. The fireworks display will be conducted by Pyrotecnico, Inc. and launched from a barge located within the waters of the Washington Channel, at The Wharf DC in Washington, DC. Hazards from the fireworks display include accidental discharge of fireworks, dangerous projectiles, and falling hot embers or other debris. The COTP has determined that potential hazards associated with the fireworks to be used in this display would be a safety concern for anyone within 200 feet of the fireworks barge. The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of vessels and the navigable waters of the Washington Channel before, during, and after the scheduled events. The Coast Guard proposes this rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. III. Discussion of Proposed Rule The COTP proposes to establish a temporary safety zone in the Washington Channel on May 10, 2018. The safety zone will cover all navigable waters of the Washington Channel within 200 feet of the fireworks barge located within an area bounded on the south by latitude 38[deg]52'30'' W, and bounded on the north by the Francis Case (I-395) Memorial Bridge, located at Washington, DC. The safety zone would be enforced from 8:30 p.m. until 10 p.m. on May 10, 2018. The duration of the safety zone is intended to ensure the safety of vessels and these navigable waters before, during, and after the scheduled fireworks display. No vessel or person would be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative. The regulatory text we are proposing appears at the end of this document. IV. Regulatory Analyses We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes and Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive Orders and we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors. A. Regulatory Planning and Review Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt from the requirements of Executive Order 13771. This regulatory action determination is based on the size, duration, and time-of-day of the safety zone. Although vessel traffic will not be able to safely transit around this safety zone, the impact would be for 1.5 hours during the evening when vessel traffic in Washington Channel is normally low. Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone. B. Impact on Small Entities The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations [[Page 17122]] that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator. If you think that your business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what degree this rule would economically affect it. Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard. C. Collection of Information This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501- 3520). D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 13132. Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. F. Environment We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a safety zone lasting less than 2 hours that would prohibit entry within a portion of the Washington Channel. Normally such actions are categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed rule. G. Protest Activities The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places, or vessels. V. Public Participation and Request for Comments We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking, and will consider all comments and material received during the comment period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or recommendation. We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate instructions. We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the docket, visit http://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice. Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket, and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a final rule is published. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows: PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 0 1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows: Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191, 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; and; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 0 2. Add Sec. 165.T05-0215 to read as follows: Sec. 165.0215 Safety Zone for Fireworks Display; Upper Potomac River, Washington Channel, Washington, DC. (a) Definitions. As used in this section: [[Page 17123]] (1) Captain of the Port means the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region. (2) Designated representative means any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the Port Maryland-National Capital Region to assist in enforcing the safety zone described in paragraph (b) of this section. (b) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable waters of the Washington Channel within 200 feet of the fireworks barge located within an area bounded on the south by latitude 38[deg]52'30'' W, and bounded on the north by the Francis Case (I-395) Memorial Bridge, located at Washington, DC. All coordinates refer to datum NAD 1983. (c) Regulations. The general safety zone regulations found in 33 CFR 165 subpart C apply to the safety zone created by this section. (1) All persons are required to comply with the general regulations governing safety zones found in 33 CFR 165.23. (2) Entry into or remaining in this zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port Maryland-National Capital Region. All vessels underway within this safety zone at the time it is implemented are to depart the zone. (3) Persons desiring to transit the area of the safety zone must first obtain authorization from the Captain of the Port Maryland- National Capital Region or designated representative. To request permission to transit the area, the Captain of the Port Maryland- National Capital Region and or designated representatives can be contacted at telephone number 410-576-2693 or on Marine Band Radio VHF- FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). The Coast Guard vessels enforcing this section can be contacted on Marine Band Radio VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel, or other Federal, State, or local agency vessel, by siren, radio, flashing light, or other means, the operator of a vessel shall proceed as directed. If permission is granted, all persons and vessels must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port Maryland-National Capital Region or designated representative and proceed as directed while within the zone. (4) Enforcement officials. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol and enforcement of the safety zone by Federal, State, and local agencies. (d) Enforcement. This section will be enforced from 8:30 p.m. until 10 p.m. on May 10, 2018. Dated: April 12, 2018. L.P. Harrison, Jr., Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Maryland-National Capital Region. [FR Doc. 2018-08091 Filed 4-17-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 18, 2018 / Proposed Rules 17121
the Commission is not aware of any designated representative. We invite Washington Channel on May 10, 2018.
existing federal laws or regulations that your comments on this proposed The safety zone will cover all navigable
address the measurement of television rulemaking. waters of the Washington Channel
screens and that would conflict with the DATES: Comments and related material within 200 feet of the fireworks barge
repeal of the Rule. must be received by the Coast Guard on located within an area bounded on the
Therefore, based on available or before May 2, 2018. south by latitude 38°52′30″ W, and
information, the Commission certifies bounded on the north by the Francis
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
that repealing the Rule as proposed will Case (I–395) Memorial Bridge, located at
identified by docket number USCG– Washington, DC. The safety zone would
not have a significant economic impact
2018–0215 using the Federal be enforced from 8:30 p.m. until 10 p.m.
on a substantial number of small
eRulemaking Portal at http:// on May 10, 2018. The duration of the
entities. To ensure the accuracy of this
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public safety zone is intended to ensure the
certification, however, the Commission
Participation and Request for safety of vessels and these navigable
requests comment on the economic
Comments’’ portion of the waters before, during, and after the
effects of the proposed repeal of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
Rule, including whether the proposed scheduled fireworks display. No vessel
further instructions on submitting or person would be permitted to enter
repeal will have a significant impact on
comments. the safety zone without obtaining
a substantial number of small entities.
Specifically, the Commission seeks FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If permission from the COTP or a
comment on the number of entities that you have questions about this proposed designated representative. The
would be affected by the proposed rulemaking, call or email Mr. Ronald regulatory text we are proposing appears
repeal of the Rule, the number of these Houck, Sector Maryland-National at the end of this document.
companies that are small entities, and Capital Region Waterways Management
IV. Regulatory Analyses
the average annual burden for each Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone
entity. 410–576–2674, email Ronald.L.Houck@ We developed this proposed rule after
uscg.mil. considering numerous statutes and
IX. List of Subjects Executive Orders related to rulemaking.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Advertising, Electronic funds transfer, Below we summarize our analyses
Television, Trade practices I. Table of Abbreviations based on a number of these statutes and
■ For the reasons stated in the preamble, CFR Code of Federal Regulations
Executive Orders and we discuss First
and under the authority of 15 U.S.C. COTP Captain of the Port Amendment rights of protestors.
57a, the Commission proposes to DHS Department of Homeland Security A. Regulatory Planning and Review
remove 16 CFR part 410. FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
By direction of the Commission. § Section direct agencies to assess the costs and
Donald S. Clark, U.S.C. United States Code benefits of available regulatory
Secretary. alternatives and, if regulation is
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
[FR Doc. 2018–08003 Filed 4–17–18; 8:45 am] necessary, to select regulatory
Basis
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
approaches that maximize net benefits.
On February 27, 2018, The Wharf DC Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
of Washington, DC notified the Coast to control regulatory costs through a
Guard that it will be conducting a budgeting process. This NPRM has not
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND fireworks display on May 10, 2018, at 9 been designated a ‘‘significant
SECURITY p.m. Details of the event were provided regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Coast Guard to the Coast Guard by the event sponsor Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
on March 23, 2018. The fireworks has not been reviewed by the Office of
33 CFR Part 165 display will be conducted by Management and Budget (OMB), and
Pyrotecnico, Inc. and launched from a pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
[Docket Number USCG–2018–0215] barge located within the waters of the from the requirements of Executive
Washington Channel, at The Wharf DC Order 13771.
RIN 1625–AA00
in Washington, DC. Hazards from the This regulatory action determination
Safety Zone for Fireworks Display; fireworks display include accidental is based on the size, duration, and time-
Upper Potomac River, Washington discharge of fireworks, dangerous of-day of the safety zone. Although
Channel, Washington, DC projectiles, and falling hot embers or vessel traffic will not be able to safely
other debris. The COTP has determined transit around this safety zone, the
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. that potential hazards associated with impact would be for 1.5 hours during
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. the fireworks to be used in this display the evening when vessel traffic in
would be a safety concern for anyone Washington Channel is normally low.
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to within 200 feet of the fireworks barge. Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue a
establish a safety zone for certain waters The purpose of this rulemaking is to Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF–
of the Upper Potomac River. This action ensure the safety of vessels and the FM marine channel 16 about the zone.
is necessary to provide for the safety of navigable waters of the Washington
B. Impact on Small Entities
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS
life on navigable waters during a Channel before, during, and after the
fireworks display in the Washington scheduled events. The Coast Guard The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
Channel at Washington, DC on May 10, proposes this rulemaking under 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
2018. This proposed rulemaking would authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. requires Federal agencies to consider
prohibit persons and vessels from the potential impact of regulations on
entering the safety zone unless III. Discussion of Proposed Rule small entities during rulemaking. The
authorized by the Captain of the Port The COTP proposes to establish a term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
Maryland-National Capital Region or a temporary safety zone in the businesses, not-for-profit organizations
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:05 Apr 17, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\18APP1.SGM 18APP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_17196/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 18, 2018 / Proposed Rules 17123
(1) Captain of the Port means the Dated: April 12, 2018. to its public docket. Do not submit
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Sector L.P. Harrison, Jr., electronically any information you
Maryland-National Capital Region. Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the consider to be Confidential Business
(2) Designated representative means Port Maryland-National Capital Region. Information (CBI) or other information
any Coast Guard commissioned, [FR Doc. 2018–08091 Filed 4–17–18; 8:45 am] whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
warrant, or petty officer who has been BILLING CODE 9110–04–P Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
authorized by the Captain of the Port etc.) must be accompanied by a written
Maryland-National Capital Region to comment. The written comment is
assist in enforcing the safety zone ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION considered the official comment and
described in paragraph (b) of this AGENCY should include discussion of all points
section. you wish to make. EPA will generally
(b) Location. The following area is a 40 CFR Part 52 not consider comments or comment
safety zone: All navigable waters of the contents located outside of the primary
[EPA–R04–OAR–2018–0142; FRL–9976–
Washington Channel within 200 feet of submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
96—Region 4]
the fireworks barge located within an other file sharing system). For
area bounded on the south by latitude Air Plan Approval; Kentucky; 2008 additional submission methods, the full
38°52′30″ W, and bounded on the north Ozone NAAQS Interstate Transport SIP EPA public comment policy,
by the Francis Case (I–395) Memorial Requirements information about CBI or multimedia
Bridge, located at Washington, DC. All submissions, and general guidance on
coordinates refer to datum NAD 1983. AGENCY: Environmental Protection making effective comments, please visit
(c) Regulations. The general safety Agency (EPA). http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
zone regulations found in 33 CFR 165 ACTION: Proposed rule. commenting-epa-dockets.
subpart C apply to the safety zone FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
created by this section. SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Ashten Bailey, Air Regulatory
(1) All persons are required to comply Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve Management Section, Air Planning and
with the general regulations governing Kentucky’s February 28, 2018, draft Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides
safety zones found in 33 CFR 165.23. State Implementation Plan (SIP) and Toxics Management Division, U.S.
(2) Entry into or remaining in this submission pertaining to the ‘‘good Environmental Protection Agency,
zone is prohibited unless authorized by neighbor’’ provision of the Clean Air Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta,
the Coast Guard Captain of the Port Act (CAA or Act) for the 2008 8-hour Georgia 30303–8960. Ms. Bailey can be
Maryland-National Capital Region. All ozone National Ambient Air Quality reached by telephone at (404) 562–9164
vessels underway within this safety Standard (NAAQS) that was submitted or via electronic mail at bailey.ashten@
zone at the time it is implemented are by Kentucky for parallel processing. The epa.gov.
to depart the zone. good neighbor provision requires each
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
(3) Persons desiring to transit the area state’s SIP to address the interstate
of the safety zone must first obtain transport of air pollution in amounts I. Background
authorization from the Captain of the that contribute significantly to On March 27, 2008 (73 FR 16436),
Port Maryland-National Capital Region nonattainment, or interfere with EPA promulgated an ozone NAAQS that
or designated representative. To request maintenance, of a NAAQS in any other revised the levels of the primary and
permission to transit the area, the state. In this action, EPA is proposing to secondary 8-hour ozone standards from
Captain of the Port Maryland-National approve Kentucky’s draft submission 0.08 parts per million (ppm) to 0.075
Capital Region and or designated demonstrating that no additional ppm. Pursuant to CAA section 110(a)(1),
representatives can be contacted at emission reductions are necessary to within three years after promulgation of
telephone number 410–576–2693 or on address the good neighbor provision for a new or revised NAAQS (or shorter, if
Marine Band Radio VHF–FM channel the 2008 ozone NAAQS beyond those EPA prescribes), states must submit SIPs
16 (156.8 MHz). The Coast Guard required by the Cross-State Air that meet the applicable requirements of
vessels enforcing this section can be Pollution Rule Update (CSAPR Update) section 110(a)(2). EPA has historically
contacted on Marine Band Radio VHF– federal implementation plan (FIP). referred to these SIP submissions made
FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). Upon Accordingly, EPA is proposing to for the purpose of satisfying the
being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard approve Kentucky’s draft submission as requirements of sections 110(a)(1) and
vessel, or other Federal, State, or local partially addressing the requirements of 110(a)(2) as ‘‘infrastructure SIP’’
agency vessel, by siren, radio, flashing the good neighbor provision for the submissions. One of the structural
light, or other means, the operator of a 2008 ozone NAAQS, and resolving any requirements of section 110(a)(2) is
vessel shall proceed as directed. If obligation remaining under the good section 110(a)(2)(D)(i), also known as
permission is granted, all persons and neighbor provision after promulgation the ‘‘good neighbor’’ provision, which
vessels must comply with the of the CSAPR Update FIP. EPA is generally requires SIPs to contain
instructions of the Captain of the Port proposing this action because it is adequate provisions to prohibit in-state
Maryland-National Capital Region or consistent with the CAA. emissions activities from having certain
designated representative and proceed DATES: Comments must be received on adverse air quality effects on
as directed while within the zone. or before May 18, 2018. neighboring states due to interstate
amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with PROPOSALS
(4) Enforcement officials. The U.S. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, transport of air pollution. There are four
Coast Guard may be assisted in the identified by Docket ID No. at EPA– sub-elements, or ‘‘prongs,’’ within
patrol and enforcement of the safety R04–OAR–2018–0142 http:// section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) of the CAA. CAA
zone by Federal, State, and local www.regulations.gov. Follow the online section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) requires SIPs to
agencies. instructions for submitting comments. include provisions prohibiting any
(d) Enforcement. This section will be Once submitted, comments cannot be source or other type of emissions
enforced from 8:30 p.m. until 10 p.m. on edited or removed from Regulations.gov. activity in one state from emitting any
May 10, 2018. EPA may publish any comment received air pollutant in amounts that will
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:05 Apr 17, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\18APP1.SGM 18APP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_17196/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-04-18 02:59:55
Document Modified: 2018-04-18 02:59:55
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Notice of proposed rulemaking. | |
| Dates | Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before May 2, 2018. | |
| Contact | If you have questions about this proposed rulemaking, call or email Mr. Ronald Houck, Sector Maryland- National Capital Region Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 410-576-2674, email [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 17121 | |
| RIN Number | 1625-AA00 | |
| CFR Associated | Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR