83 FR 17962 - Safety Zone; Officer Lehner Memorial Vintage Regatta; Buffalo Outer Harbor, Buffalo, NY

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 80 (April 25, 2018)

Page Range		17962-17964
FR Document		2018-08626

The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone for certain waters of the Buffalo Outer Harbor during the Officer Lehner Memorial Vintage Regatta. This proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from being in the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or a designated representative. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 80 (Wednesday, April 25, 2018)

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 25, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 17962-17964]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-08626]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2018-0078]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Officer Lehner Memorial Vintage Regatta; Buffalo 
Outer Harbor, Buffalo, NY

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone 
for certain waters of the Buffalo Outer Harbor during the Officer 
Lehner Memorial Vintage Regatta. This proposed rulemaking would 
prohibit persons and vessels from being in the safety zone unless 
authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or a designated 
representative. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast 
Guard on or before May 25, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2018-0078 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for 
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further 
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this 
proposed rulemaking, call or email LT Michael Collet, Chief of 
Waterways Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Buffalo; telephone 716-
843-9322, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    On December 27, 2017, the Buffalo Vintage Boat Racing Association 
and BR Guest Inc., notified the Coast Guard that it will be conducting 
a boat race from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on July 1, 2018, on the 
Buffalo Outer Harbor. Hazards from the boat regatta include high speed 
vessels. The Captain of the Port Buffalo (COTP) has determined that 
potential hazards associated with the Officer Lehner Memorial Vintage 
Regatta would be a safety concern for anyone within the designated 
course encompassed by all waters inside of the Outer Harbor, Buffalo, 
NY starting at position 42[deg] 52'04'' N, 078[deg] 53'03'' W then 
South to 42[deg] 51'07'' N, 078[deg] 52'09'' W (NAD 83). The course 
will extend a minimum of 100 yards from the shore and the breakwall.
    The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of vessels 
and the navigable waters within the above stated points before, during, 
and after the scheduled event. The Coast Guard proposes this rulemaking 
under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The COTP proposes to establish a temporary safety zone, enforced 
intermittently, from 9:45 a.m. to 4:15 p.m. on July 1, 2018. The safety 
zone will encompass all waters inside of the Outer Harbor, Buffalo, NY 
starting at position 42[deg] 52'04'' N, 078[deg] 53'03'' W then South 
to 42[deg] 51'07'' N, 078[deg] 52'09'' W (NAD 83). The course will 
extend a minimum of 100 yards from the shore and the breakwall. The 
duration of the

[[Page 17963]]

zone is intended to ensure the safety of vessels and these navigable 
waters before, during, and after the scheduled 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. 
boat races. No vessel or person would be permitted to enter the safety 
zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated 
representative. The regulatory text we are proposing appears at the end 
of this document.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes 
and Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our 
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive Orders and 
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control 
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been 
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt 
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size, 
location, duration, and time-of-day of the safety zone. Vessel traffic 
would be able to safely transit around this safety zone, which would 
impact a small designated area of the Buffalo Outer Harbor, by 
transiting a short distance in Lake Erie. The safety zone would also 
have built in times where vessels will be able to transit through 
between race heats. Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue a Broadcast 
Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone, and the 
rule would allow vessels to seek permission to enter the zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this 
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
IV. A. above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic 
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what 
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect 
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you 
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that 
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action 
of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of 
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and 
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under 
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or 
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not 
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule 
elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland 
Security Directive 023-01, which guides the Coast Guard in complying 
with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-
4370f), and have made a preliminary determination that this action is 
one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively 
have a significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule 
involves an intermittently enforced safety zone lasting 6.5 hours that 
would prohibit entry into all waters inside of the Outer Harbor, 
Buffalo, NY starting at position 42[deg] 52'04'' N, 078[deg] 53'03'' W 
then South to 42[deg] 51'07'' N, 078[deg] 52'09'' W (NAD 83). The 
course will extend a minimum of 100 yards from the shore and the 
breakwall. Normally such actions are categorically excluded from 
further review under paragraph L[61] of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS 
Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A preliminary Record of 
Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available 
in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or 
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant 
environmental impact from this proposed rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places, or vessels.

[[Page 17964]]

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking, 
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment 
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If 
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this 
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which 
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or 
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be 
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate 
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted 
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any 
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the 
docket, visit http://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket, 
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's 
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up 
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a 
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record 
keeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes 
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 
1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security 
Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T09-0078 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T09-0078   Safety Zone; Officer Lehner Memorial Vintage 
Regatta; Buffalo Outer Harbor, Buffalo, NY.

    (a) Location. The safety zone will encompass all waters inside of 
the Outer Harbor, Buffalo, NY, starting at position 42[deg] 52'04'' N, 
078[deg] 53'03'' W then South to 42[deg] 51'07'' N, 078[deg] 52'09'' W 
(NAD 83). The course will extend a minimum of 100 yards from the shore 
and the breakwall.
    (b) Enforcement Period. This rule is effective from 9:45 a.m. until 
4:15 p.m. on July 1, 2018.
    (c) Regulations.
    (1) In accordance with the general regulations in Sec.  165.23 of 
this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within this safety zone 
is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or 
his designated on-scene representative.
    (2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may 
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his designated on-
scene representative.
    (3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port 
Buffalo is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who 
has been designated by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act on his 
behalf.
    (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety 
zone must contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his on-scene 
representative to obtain permission to do so. The Captain of the Port 
Buffalo or his on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 
16. Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in the safety 
zone must comply with all directions given to them by the Captain of 
the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene representative.

    Dated: March 21, 2018.
J.S. DuFresne,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 2018-08626 Filed 4-24-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 25, 2018 / Proposed Rules 17963

zone is intended to ensure the safety of have a significant economic impact on implications for federalism or Indian
vessels and these navigable waters a substantial number of small entities. tribes, please contact the person listed
before, during, and after the scheduled While some owners or operators of in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. boat races. No vessels intending to transit the safety CONTACT section.
vessel or person would be permitted to zone may be small entities, for the
enter the safety zone without obtaining reasons stated in section IV. A. above, E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
permission from the COTP or a this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
designated representative. The
vessel owner or operator. of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
regulatory text we are proposing appears
at the end of this document. If you think that your business, Federal agencies to assess the effects of
organization, or governmental their discretionary regulatory actions. In
IV. Regulatory Analyses jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity particular, the Act addresses actions
We developed this proposed rule after and that this rule would have a that may result in the expenditure by a
considering numerous statutes and significant economic impact on it, State, local, or tribal government, in the
Executive Orders related to rulemaking. please submit a comment (see aggregate, or by the private sector of
Below we summarize our analyses ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
based on a number of these statutes and qualifies and how and to what degree more in any one year. Though this
Executive Orders and we discuss First this rule would economically affect it. proposed rule would not result in such
Amendment rights of protestors. Under section 213(a) of the Small an expenditure, we do discuss the
Business Regulatory Enforcement effects of this rule elsewhere in this
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104– preamble.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 121), we want to assist small entities in
direct agencies to assess the costs and understanding this proposed rule. If the F. Environment
benefits of available regulatory rule would affect your small business,
alternatives and, if regulation is organization, or governmental We have analyzed this proposed rule
necessary, to select regulatory jurisdiction and you have questions under Department of Homeland
approaches that maximize net benefits. concerning its provisions or options for Security Directive 023–01, which guides
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies compliance, please contact the person the Coast Guard in complying with the
to control regulatory costs through a listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION National Environmental Policy Act of
budgeting process. This NPRM has not CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
been designated a ‘‘significant not retaliate against small entities that made a preliminary determination that
regulatory action,’’ under Executive question or complain about this this action is one of a category of actions
Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM proposed rule or any policy or action of that do not individually or cumulatively
has not been reviewed by the Office of the Coast Guard. have a significant effect on the human
Management and Budget (OMB), and environment. This proposed rule
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt C. Collection of Information
involves an intermittently enforced
from the requirements of Executive This proposed rule would not call for safety zone lasting 6.5 hours that would
Order 13771. a new collection of information under prohibit entry into all waters inside of
This regulatory action determination the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 the Outer Harbor, Buffalo, NY starting at
is based on the size, location, duration, (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). position 42° 52′04″ N, 078° 53′03″ W
and time-of-day of the safety zone.
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal then South to 42° 51′07″ N, 078° 52′09″
Vessel traffic would be able to safely
Governments W (NAD 83). The course will extend a
transit around this safety zone, which
would impact a small designated area of A rule has implications for federalism minimum of 100 yards from the shore
the Buffalo Outer Harbor, by transiting under Executive Order 13132, and the breakwall. Normally such
a short distance in Lake Erie. The safety Federalism, if it has a substantial direct actions are categorically excluded from
zone would also have built in times effect on the States, on the relationship further review under paragraph L[61] of
where vessels will be able to transit between the national government and Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
through between race heats. Moreover, the States, or on the distribution of Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 01. A
the Coast Guard would issue a power and responsibilities among the preliminary Record of Environmental
Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF– various levels of government. We have Consideration supporting this
FM marine channel 16 about the zone, analyzed this proposed rule under that determination is available in the docket
and the rule would allow vessels to seek Order and have determined that it is where indicated under ADDRESSES. We
permission to enter the zone. consistent with the fundamental seek any comments or information that
federalism principles and preemption may lead to the discovery of a
B. Impact on Small Entities requirements described in Executive significant environmental impact from
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of Order 13132. this proposed rule.
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, Also, this proposed rule does not have
requires Federal agencies to consider tribal implications under Executive G. Protest Activities
the potential impact of regulations on Order 13175, Consultation and
small entities during rulemaking. The Coordination with Indian Tribal The Coast Guard respects the First
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS

term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small Governments, because it would not have Amendment rights of protesters.
businesses, not-for-profit organizations a substantial direct effect on one or Protesters are asked to contact the
that are independently owned and more Indian tribes, on the relationship person listed in the FOR FURTHER
operated and are not dominant in their between the Federal Government and INFORMATION CONTACT section to
fields, and governmental jurisdictions Indian tribes, or on the distribution of coordinate protest activities so that your
with populations of less than 50,000. power and responsibilities between the message can be received without
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. Federal Government and Indian tribes. jeopardizing the safety or security of
605(b) that this proposed rule would not If you believe this proposed rule has people, places, or vessels.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:10 Apr 24, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\25APP1.SGM 25APP1

Document Created: 2018-11-02 08:17:51
Document Modified: 2018-11-02 08:17:51

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Dates		Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before May 25, 2018.
Contact		If you have questions about this proposed rulemaking, call or email LT Michael Collet, Chief of Waterways Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Buffalo; telephone 716- 843-9322, email [email protected]
FR Citation		83 FR 17962
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (Water); Reporting and Record Keeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

83 FR 17962 - Safety Zone; Officer Lehner Memorial Vintage Regatta; Buffalo Outer Harbor, Buffalo, NY

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 80 (April 25, 2018)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard