83 FR 18412 - Anchorage Grounds; Galveston Harbor, Bolivar Roads Channel, Galveston, Texas

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 82 (April 27, 2018)

Page Range		18412-18414
FR Document		2018-08873
The Coast Guard is establishing a new anchorage area, Anchorage Area Alpha (A) East in Bolivar Roads near Galveston, Texas. The establishment of this additional anchorage area would enhance navigational safety, support regional maritime security needs, and contribute to the free flow of commerce in the Houston-Galveston area.
Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 82 (Friday, April 27, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18412-18414]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-08873]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 110

[Docket Number USCG-2015-0549]
RIN 1625-AA01


Anchorage Grounds; Galveston Harbor, Bolivar Roads Channel, 
Galveston, Texas

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a new anchorage area, 
Anchorage Area Alpha (A) East in Bolivar Roads near Galveston, Texas. 
The establishment of this additional anchorage area would enhance 
navigational safety, support regional maritime security needs, and 
contribute to the free flow of commerce in the Houston-Galveston area.

DATES: This rule is effective May 29, 2018.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2015-0549 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email Lieutenant Commander (LCDR) Navin Griffin, Sector 
Houston-Galveston, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone (281) 464-4736, email 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    On August 15, 2017, the Coast Guard published a notice of proposed 
rulemaking (NPRM) titled Anchorage Grounds; Galveston Harbor, Bolivar 
Roads Channel, Galveston, Texas (82 FR 38643). There we stated why we 
issued the NPRM, and invited comments on our proposed regulatory action 
related to this Anchorage Area. During the comment period that ended, 
October 16, 2017, we received no comments.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The legal basis and authorities for this rule are found in 33 
U.S.C. 471, 1221 through 1236; 33 CFR 1.05-1, Department of Homeland 
Security Delegation No. 0170.1, which collectively authorize the Coast 
Guard to propose, establish, and define regulatory anchorages.
    After extensive discussion, including the observations of and 
comments from various members of the port community, the Coast Guard 
has determined that the establishment of Anchorage Area (A) East in the 
Bolivar Roads area is necessary to address port security, port 
congestion, and navigation safety concerns. The proposed anchorage area 
was once an area utilized for spoils from dredging and is equipped to 
safely receive deep draft vessels. This proposed anchorage is primarily 
intended as an overflow

[[Page 18413]]

anchorage for vessels that are awaiting an exam or inspection. We are 
amending 33 CFR 110.197 to establish Anchorage Area (A) East in order 
to increase the safety of life and property on navigable waters, 
improve the safety of vessels operating, transiting, or anchored and 
moored in the vicinity, and provide for the overall safe and efficient 
flow of vessel traffic and commerce in the area.
    The Coast Guard has ascertained the view of the Galveston, TX 
District and Division Engineer, Corps of Engineers, U.S. Army, about 
the specific provisions of this rule.

IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule

    As noted above, we received no comments on our NPRM published 
August 15, 2017. There are no changes in the regulatory text of this 
rule from the proposed rule in the NPRM.
    This rule establishes a new anchorage Area known as Anchorage Area 
Alpha (A) East. This anchorage area is located in the Galveston Harbor 
and Bolivar Roads Channel, TX, just east and adjacent to established 
Anchorage Area (A) in 33 CFR 110.197(a)(1). The boundaries of Anchorage 
Area Alpha (A) East are presented in Sec.  110.197(a)(4) in the 
regulatory text at the end of this document. The anchorage area is 
approximately 0.19 square miles.
    Anchorage Area (A) East is intended for temporary use by vessels of 
all types. Vessels will be allowed to occupy the anchorage areas during 
a wide range of conditions and for a broad variety of purposes. For 
example, vessels would be allowed to anchor temporarily while taking on 
stores, transferring personnel, or engaging in bunkering operations. 
Vessels would also be allowed to use anchorage areas while awaiting 
weather and other conditions favorable to resuming their voyage. 
However, it is to be emphasized that this anchorage is primarily 
intended as an overflow anchorage for vessels that are awaiting an exam 
or inspection. Vessels would not be allowed to anchor so as to obstruct 
the passage of other vessels proceeding to and from anchorage spaces. 
Anchors would not be placed in the channel and no portion of the hull 
or rigging would be allowed to extend outside the limits of the 
anchorage area.
    Whenever the maritime or commercial interests of the United States 
so require, the Captain of the Port Houston-Galveston or his designated 
representative may direct the movement of any vessel anchored or moored 
within the anchorage areas.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control 
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been 
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt 
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the location and 
size of the proposed anchorage grounds, as well as, historical 
automatic identification system (AIS) data. The impacts on routine 
navigation are expected to be minimal because the proposed anchorage 
area is located outside of the established navigation channel. When not 
occupied, vessels would be able to maneuver in, around, and through the 
anchorage. Operators on our end maneuvering their vessels around the 
limits of the proposed anchorage area would not be significantly 
impacted.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard received 00 comments from the Small Business 
Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    The number of small entities impacted and the extent of the impact, 
if any, is expected to be minimal. The anchorage area is located in an 
area of Bolivar Roads that is not a popular or productive fishing 
location. Further, the location is in an area not routinely transited 
by vessels heading to, or returning from, known fishing grounds. 
Finally, the anchorage is located in an area that is not currently used 
by small entities, including small vessels, for anchoring due to the 
depth of water naturally present in the area.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and

[[Page 18414]]

responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Directive 023-01, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the 
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and 
have determined that this action is one of a category of actions that 
do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the 
human environment. This rule involves the establishment of a permanent 
anchorage area in Bolivar Roads near Galveston, Texas. It is 
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L59(a) of 
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A 
Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is 
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110

    Anchorage Grounds.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 110 as follows:

PART 110--ANCHORAGE REGULATIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 110 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471, 1221 through 1236, 2071; 33 CFR 1.05-
1; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.


0
2. In Sec.  110.197, add paragraph (a)(4) to read as follows:


Sec.  110.197  Galveston Harbor, Bolivar Roads Channel, Texas.

    (a) * * *
    (4) Anchorage Area (A) East. The waters bounded by a line 
connecting the following points:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Latitude                            Longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
29[deg]21'5.87'' N                   094[deg]42'52.7'' W
29[deg]20'53.99'' N                  094[deg]42'7.13'' W
29[deg]20'45.31'' N                  094[deg]42'37.75'' W
29[deg]20'39.16'' N                  094[deg]42'7.81'' W
------------------------------------------------------------------------


and thence to the point of beginning. The coordinates are based on NAD 
83.
* * * * *

    Dated: April 23, 2018.
Paul F. Thomas,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2018-08873 Filed 4-26-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 82 / Friday, April 27, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 18413

anchorage for vessels that are awaiting V. Regulatory Analyses location is in an area not routinely
an exam or inspection. We are We developed this rule after transited by vessels heading to, or
amending 33 CFR 110.197 to establish considering numerous statutes and returning from, known fishing grounds.
Anchorage Area (A) East in order to Executive orders related to rulemaking. Finally, the anchorage is located in an
increase the safety of life and property Below we summarize our analyses area that is not currently used by small
on navigable waters, improve the safety entities, including small vessels, for
based on a number of these statutes and
of vessels operating, transiting, or anchoring due to the depth of water
Executive orders, and we discuss First
anchored and moored in the vicinity, naturally present in the area.
Amendment rights of protestors. Under section 213(a) of the Small
and provide for the overall safe and
efficient flow of vessel traffic and A. Regulatory Planning and Review Business Regulatory Enforcement
commerce in the area. Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
we want to assist small entities in
The Coast Guard has ascertained the direct agencies to assess the costs and
understanding this rule. If the rule
view of the Galveston, TX District and benefits of available regulatory
would affect your small business,
Division Engineer, Corps of Engineers, alternatives and, if regulation is
organization, or governmental
U.S. Army, about the specific provisions necessary, to select regulatory
jurisdiction and you have questions
of this rule. approaches that maximize net benefits.
concerning its provisions or options for
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, compliance, please contact the person
to control regulatory costs through a
and the Rule listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
budgeting process. This rule has not
CONTACT section.
As noted above, we received no been designated a ‘‘significant Small businesses may send comments
comments on our NPRM published regulatory action,’’ under Executive on the actions of Federal employees
August 15, 2017. There are no changes Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has who enforce, or otherwise determine
in the regulatory text of this rule from not been reviewed by the Office of compliance with, Federal regulations to
the proposed rule in the NPRM. Management and Budget (OMB), and the Small Business and Agriculture
This rule establishes a new anchorage pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
Area known as Anchorage Area Alpha from the requirements of Executive and the Regional Small Business
(A) East. This anchorage area is located Order 13771. Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
in the Galveston Harbor and Bolivar This regulatory action determination Ombudsman evaluates these actions
Roads Channel, TX, just east and is based on the location and size of the annually and rates each agency’s
adjacent to established Anchorage Area proposed anchorage grounds, as well as, responsiveness to small business. If you
(A) in 33 CFR 110.197(a)(1). The historical automatic identification wish to comment on actions by
boundaries of Anchorage Area Alpha system (AIS) data. The impacts on employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
(A) East are presented in § 110.197(a)(4) routine navigation are expected to be 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
in the regulatory text at the end of this minimal because the proposed Coast Guard will not retaliate against
document. The anchorage area is anchorage area is located outside of the small entities that question or complain
approximately 0.19 square miles. established navigation channel. When about this rule or any policy or action
not occupied, vessels would be able to of the Coast Guard.
Anchorage Area (A) East is intended maneuver in, around, and through the
for temporary use by vessels of all types. anchorage. Operators on our end C. Collection of Information
Vessels will be allowed to occupy the maneuvering their vessels around the This rule will not call for a new
anchorage areas during a wide range of limits of the proposed anchorage area collection of information under the
conditions and for a broad variety of would not be significantly impacted. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
purposes. For example, vessels would
B. Impact on Small Entities U.S.C. 3501–3520).
be allowed to anchor temporarily while
taking on stores, transferring personnel, The Regulatory Flexibility Act of D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
or engaging in bunkering operations. 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, Governments
Vessels would also be allowed to use requires Federal agencies to consider A rule has implications for federalism
anchorage areas while awaiting weather the potential impact of regulations on under Executive Order 13132,
and other conditions favorable to small entities during rulemaking. The Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
resuming their voyage. However, it is to term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small effect on the States, on the relationship
be emphasized that this anchorage is businesses, not-for-profit organizations between the national government and
primarily intended as an overflow that are independently owned and the States, or on the distribution of
anchorage for vessels that are awaiting operated and are not dominant in their power and responsibilities among the
an exam or inspection. Vessels would fields, and governmental jurisdictions various levels of government. We have
not be allowed to anchor so as to with populations of less than 50,000. analyzed this rule under that Order and
obstruct the passage of other vessels The Coast Guard received 00 comments have determined that it is consistent
proceeding to and from anchorage from the Small Business Administration with the fundamental federalism
spaces. Anchors would not be placed in on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard principles and preemption requirements
the channel and no portion of the hull certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this described in Executive Order 13132.
or rigging would be allowed to extend rule will not have a significant Also, this rule does not have tribal
outside the limits of the anchorage area. economic impact on a substantial implications under Executive Order
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with RULES

Whenever the maritime or number of small entities. 13175, Consultation and Coordination
commercial interests of the United The number of small entities with Indian Tribal Governments,
States so require, the Captain of the Port impacted and the extent of the impact, because it does not have a substantial
Houston-Galveston or his designated if any, is expected to be minimal. The direct effect on one or more Indian
representative may direct the movement anchorage area is located in an area of tribes, on the relationship between the
of any vessel anchored or moored Bolivar Roads that is not a popular or Federal Government and Indian tribes,
within the anchorage areas. productive fishing location. Further, the or on the distribution of power and

VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:07 Apr 26, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\27APR1.SGM 27APR1
18414 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 82 / Friday, April 27, 2018 / Rules and Regulations

responsibilities between the Federal Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471, 1221 through ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
Government and Indian tribes. If you 1236, 2071; 33 CFR 1.05–1; Department of identified by docket number USCG–
believe this rule has implications for Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 2017–0857 using Federal eRulemaking
federalism or Indian tribes, please ■ 2. In § 110.197, add paragraph (a)(4) to Portal at http://www.regulations.gov.
contact the person listed in the FOR read as follows: See the ‘‘Public Participation and
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Request for Comments’’ portion of the
§ 110.197 Galveston Harbor, Bolivar Roads SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Channel, Texas. below for instructions on submitting
(a) * * * comments.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (4) Anchorage Area (A) East. The
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires waters bounded by a line connecting the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
Federal agencies to assess the effects of following points: you have questions on this test
their discretionary regulatory actions. In deviation, call or email LT Allan Storm,
particular, the Act addresses actions Latitude Longitude Sector Jacksonville, Waterways
that may result in the expenditure by a Management Division, U.S. Coast
State, local, or tribal government, in the 29°21′5.87″ N 094°42′52.7″ W Guard; telephone 904–714–7616, email
aggregate, or by the private sector of 29°20′53.99″ N 094°42′7.13″ W Allan.H.Storm@uscg.mil.
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 29°20′45.31″ N 094°42′37.75″ W SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
more in any one year. Though this rule 29°20′39.16″ N 094°42′7.81″ W
will not result in such an expenditure, I. Background, Purpose and Legal Basis
we do discuss the effects of this rule and thence to the point of beginning. The Buffalo Bluff CSX Railroad Bridge
elsewhere in this preamble. The coordinates are based on NAD 83. across the St. Johns River, mile 94.5, in
* * * * * Satsuma, Putnam County, FL is a
F. Environment
Dated: April 23, 2018. bascule bridge. It has a vertical
We have analyzed this rule under Paul F. Thomas, clearance of 7 feet at mean high water
Department of Homeland Security in the closed position and a horizontal
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Directive 023–01, which guides the Eighth Coast Guard District. clearance of 90 feet. The bridge is
Coast Guard in complying with the currently manned and maintained in the
[FR Doc. 2018–08873 Filed 4–26–18; 8:45 am]
National Environmental Policy Act of open position. This test deviation would
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have provide for the bridge to be remotely
determined that this action is one of a monitored and operated. Visual
category of actions that do not DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND monitoring of the waterway shall be
individually or cumulatively have a SECURITY maintained with the use of cameras and
significant effect on the human the detection of vessels under the span
environment. This rule involves the Coast Guard shall be accomplished with detection
establishment of a permanent anchorage sensors. Marine radio communication
area in Bolivar Roads near Galveston, 33 CFR Part 117 shall be maintained with mariners near
Texas. It is categorically excluded from the bridge for the safety of navigation.
[Docket No. USCG–2017–0857] The remote tender may also be
further review under paragraph L59(a)
of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS contacted via telephone at (386) 649–
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; St.
Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01, 8358. The span is normally in the fully
Johns River, Putnam County, FL
Rev. 01. A Record of Environmental open position and will display green
Consideration supporting this AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. lights to indicate that the span is fully
determination is available in the docket ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation open. When a train approaches, the
where indicated under ADDRESSES. from regulations; request for comments. remote tender shall monitor for vessels
approaching the bridge. The remote
G. Protest Activities SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has issued a tender shall warn approaching vessels
temporary deviation from the operating via marine radio, channel 9 VHF of a
The Coast Guard respects the First
schedule that governs the Buffalo Bluff bridge lowering. Provided the sensors
Amendment rights of protesters.
CSX Railroad Bridge across the St. Johns do not detect a vessel under the span,
Protesters are asked to contact the
River, mile 94.5, at Satsuma, Putnam the tender shall initiate the span
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
County, FL. This deviation will test a lowering sequence, which includes the
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
change to the drawbridge operation to sounding of a horn and the displaying
coordinate protest activities so that your
determine whether a permanent change of red lights. The span will remain in
message can be received without
from manned to remote operations is the down position for a minimum of
jeopardizing the safety or security of
feasible. This deviation will allow the eight minutes or for the entire time the
people, places or vessels.
bridge to operate remotely from the CSX approach track circuit is occupied. After
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110 Railroad Bridge on the Ortega River the train has cleared the bridge track
(McGirts Creek) located at mile 1.1 on circuit, the span shall open and the
Anchorage Grounds. the Ortega River. green lights will be displayed. This will
For the reasons discussed in the DATES: This deviation is effective allow vessels to pass through the bridge
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 without actual notice from April 27, while taking into account the reasonable
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with RULES

CFR part 110 as follows: 2018 through 6 a.m. September 2, 2018. needs of other modes of transportation.
For the purposes of enforcement, actual The Coast Guard will also inform the
PART 110—ANCHORAGE notice will be used from April 23, 2018, users of the waterways through our
REGULATIONS until April 27, 2018. Local and Broadcast Notices to Mariners
Comments and related materials must of the change in operating schedule for
■ 1. The authority citation for part 110 reach the Coast Guard on or before the bridge so that vessel operators can
continues to read as follows: August 14, 2018. arrange their transits to minimize any

VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:07 Apr 26, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\27APR1.SGM 27APR1
Document Created: 2018-04-27 01:45:58
Document Modified: 2018-04-27 01:45:58
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective May 29, 2018.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email Lieutenant Commander (LCDR) Navin Griffin, Sector Houston-Galveston, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone (281) 464-4736, email [email protected]
FR Citation		83 FR 18412
RIN Number		1625-AA01
83 FR 18412 - Anchorage Grounds; Galveston Harbor, Bolivar Roads Channel, Galveston, Texas

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 82 (April 27, 2018)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
