83_FR_18573 83 FR 18491 - Anchorages; Captain of the Port Puget Sound Zone, WA

83 FR 18491 - Anchorages; Captain of the Port Puget Sound Zone, WA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 82 (April 27, 2018)

Page Range18491-18491
FR Document2018-08871

The Coast Guard is withdrawing its notice of proposed rulemaking entitled ``Anchorages; Captain of the Port Puget Sound Zone, WA'' that we published on February 10, 2017. The Coast Guard is withdrawing this rulemaking in response to public comments and to better analyze potential impacts to tribal treaty rights, especially treaty fishing rights.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 82 (Friday, April 27, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 18491]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-08871]



[[Page 18491]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 110

[Docket Number USCG-2016-0916]
RIN 1625-AA01


Anchorages; Captain of the Port Puget Sound Zone, WA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is withdrawing its notice of proposed 
rulemaking entitled ``Anchorages; Captain of the Port Puget Sound Zone, 
WA'' that we published on February 10, 2017. The Coast Guard is 
withdrawing this rulemaking in response to public comments and to 
better analyze potential impacts to tribal treaty rights, especially 
treaty fishing rights.

DATES: The notice of proposed rulemaking is withdrawn on April 27, 
2018.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this withdrawn rulemaking is available by 
searching docket number USCG-2016-0916 using the Federal portal at 
http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this 
notice of inquiry, call or email LCDR Christina Sullivan, U.S. Coast 
Guard Sector Puget Sound; telephone 206-217-6042, email 
SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

II. Background

    We published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal 
Register on February 10, 2017 (82 FR 10313), entitled ``Anchorages; 
Captain of the Port Puget Sound Zone, WA.'' In the NPRM, we proposed 
the creation of several new anchorages, holding areas, and a non-
anchorage area as well as the expansion of one existing general 
anchorage in the Puget Sound area, as detailed in the proposed 
regulatory text. The Coast Guard received feedback from concerned 
citizens, commercial entities, environmental groups, and from Indian 
Tribal Governments and tribal officials regarding the proposed 
rulemaking. These comments were made available in the docket. Based on 
the information received from the tribes in the docket, the Coast Guard 
is withdrawing the proposed rulemaking at this time so as to better 
analyze tribal impacts before conducting further rulemaking on 
anchorages in Puget Sound. The Coast Guard actively exercises its 
authority to manage vessel traffic in the Puget Sound in a safe and 
effective manner, both historically and at present. The Coast Guard is 
committed to improving the navigational safety of all Puget Sound 
waterway users, and is continually engaged in efforts to improve safety 
through coordination with waterways users.
    The Coast Guard provided notice of its intent to withdraw the 
rulemaking and also its intent not to schedule consultation with the 
tribes on the proposed rulemaking in light of the withdrawal. In that 
published notification (82 FR 54307, November 17, 2017), the Coast 
Guard requested comment on whether or not withdrawal is appropriate, 
and also if tribal consultation was still necessary in light of the 
Coast Guard's stated intent to withdraw the proposed rule.

III. Discussion of Comments

    The Coast Guard received nine written submissions in response to 
its request for comment on its intent to withdraw the proposed rule; 
six concerned citizens, two on behalf of coalitions of environmental 
groups, and one from a federally recognized tribe. Of the nine 
commenters, one commenter supported the withdrawal, three commenters 
indicated that withdrawal is not supported without an environmental 
impact statement being done, one commenter supported continuing with 
the rule so long as an environmental impact study is conducted, and 
four commenters made no affirmative or negative comment on withdrawal 
of the proposed rule, but requested an environmental impact statement. 
The Coast Guard is withdrawing its proposed rulemaking based on the 
comments received and in order to better analyze the impacts to tribal 
treaty rights, especially treaty fishing rights.
    All commenters requested or emphasized the importance of an 
environmental impact statement. The Coast Guard will follow all 
applicable laws and regulations, including the National Environmental 
Policy Act, with respect to any anchorages rulemaking in the Puget 
Sound that may be conducted in the future.
    Two commenters requested the Coast Guard conduct an environmental 
impact statement on the use of uncodified anchorages before withdrawing 
the current proposed rule. The Coast Guard's withdrawal of the proposed 
anchorage rule is not a government action for which an environmental 
impact statement on the uncodified anchorages is required.
    Two commenters indicated that tribal consultation is appropriate 
within the proposal area with respect to the proposed rule, two 
commenters deferred to tribal governments on the issue of whether 
tribal consultation on this rule is appropriate, and one tribe 
commented that it had previously engaged with the Coast Guard on a 
government-to-government basis and submitted comments on the proposed 
rule. The Coast Guard is committed to upholding its responsibilities as 
the federal trustee of the tribes' interests, and will conduct formal 
government-to-government consultation when required under Executive 
Order 13175. The Coast Guard is withdrawing the current proposed 
rulemaking and has engaged with the tribes to address broader treaty 
rights issues in processes outside this rulemaking. As a result of the 
above actions, the Coast Guard will not conduct consultation on this 
specific rulemaking.

IV. Withdrawal

    The Coast Guard has determined that withdrawing the proposed rule 
is appropriate based on the new information received from the tribes in 
the docket. Accordingly, the Coast Guard is withdrawing the 
``Anchorages; Captain of the Port Puget Sound Zone, WA'' proposed 
rulemaking announced in an NPRM published February 10, 2017 (82 FR 
10313). As noted, the Coast Guard has the authority and ability to 
manage vessel traffic in the Puget Sound in a safe and effective 
manner. We are committed to improving the navigational safety of all 
Puget Sound waterway users, and will continually consider ways to do so 
in an effective and least burdensome manner consistent with tribal 
treaty fishing rights.

    Dated: April 23, 2018.
David G. Throop,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Thirteenth Coast Guard 
District.
[FR Doc. 2018-08871 Filed 4-26-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P



                                                                              Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 82 / Friday, April 27, 2018 / Proposed Rules                                                 18491

                                                    DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND                                  to better analyze tribal impacts before                action for which an environmental
                                                    SECURITY                                                conducting further rulemaking on                       impact statement on the uncodified
                                                                                                            anchorages in Puget Sound. The Coast                   anchorages is required.
                                                    Coast Guard                                             Guard actively exercises its authority to                 Two commenters indicated that tribal
                                                                                                            manage vessel traffic in the Puget Sound               consultation is appropriate within the
                                                    33 CFR Part 110                                         in a safe and effective manner, both                   proposal area with respect to the
                                                    [Docket Number USCG–2016–0916]
                                                                                                            historically and at present. The Coast                 proposed rule, two commenters deferred
                                                                                                            Guard is committed to improving the                    to tribal governments on the issue of
                                                    RIN 1625–AA01                                           navigational safety of all Puget Sound                 whether tribal consultation on this rule
                                                                                                            waterway users, and is continually                     is appropriate, and one tribe commented
                                                    Anchorages; Captain of the Port Puget                   engaged in efforts to improve safety                   that it had previously engaged with the
                                                    Sound Zone, WA                                          through coordination with waterways                    Coast Guard on a government-to-
                                                    AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.                               users.                                                 government basis and submitted
                                                    ACTION:Notice of proposed rulemaking;                      The Coast Guard provided notice of                  comments on the proposed rule. The
                                                    withdrawal.                                             its intent to withdraw the rulemaking                  Coast Guard is committed to upholding
                                                                                                            and also its intent not to schedule                    its responsibilities as the federal trustee
                                                    SUMMARY:   The Coast Guard is                           consultation with the tribes on the                    of the tribes’ interests, and will conduct
                                                    withdrawing its notice of proposed                      proposed rulemaking in light of the                    formal government-to-government
                                                    rulemaking entitled ‘‘Anchorages;                       withdrawal. In that published                          consultation when required under
                                                    Captain of the Port Puget Sound Zone,                   notification (82 FR 54307, November 17,                Executive Order 13175. The Coast
                                                    WA’’ that we published on February 10,                  2017), the Coast Guard requested                       Guard is withdrawing the current
                                                    2017. The Coast Guard is withdrawing                    comment on whether or not withdrawal                   proposed rulemaking and has engaged
                                                    this rulemaking in response to public                   is appropriate, and also if tribal                     with the tribes to address broader treaty
                                                    comments and to better analyze                          consultation was still necessary in light              rights issues in processes outside this
                                                    potential impacts to tribal treaty rights,              of the Coast Guard’s stated intent to                  rulemaking. As a result of the above
                                                    especially treaty fishing rights.                       withdraw the proposed rule.                            actions, the Coast Guard will not
                                                    DATES: The notice of proposed                           III. Discussion of Comments                            conduct consultation on this specific
                                                    rulemaking is withdrawn on April 27,                                                                           rulemaking.
                                                                                                               The Coast Guard received nine
                                                    2018.
                                                                                                            written submissions in response to its                 IV. Withdrawal
                                                    ADDRESSES: The docket for this                          request for comment on its intent to
                                                    withdrawn rulemaking is available by                                                                              The Coast Guard has determined that
                                                                                                            withdraw the proposed rule; six                        withdrawing the proposed rule is
                                                    searching docket number USCG–2016–                      concerned citizens, two on behalf of
                                                    0916 using the Federal portal at http://                                                                       appropriate based on the new
                                                                                                            coalitions of environmental groups, and                information received from the tribes in
                                                    www.regulations.gov.                                    one from a federally recognized tribe. Of
                                                                                                                                                                   the docket. Accordingly, the Coast
                                                    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If                     the nine commenters, one commenter
                                                                                                                                                                   Guard is withdrawing the ‘‘Anchorages;
                                                    you have questions about this notice of                 supported the withdrawal, three
                                                                                                                                                                   Captain of the Port Puget Sound Zone,
                                                    inquiry, call or email LCDR Christina                   commenters indicated that withdrawal
                                                                                                                                                                   WA’’ proposed rulemaking announced
                                                    Sullivan, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Puget                 is not supported without an
                                                                                                                                                                   in an NPRM published February 10,
                                                    Sound; telephone 206–217–6042, email                    environmental impact statement being
                                                                                                                                                                   2017 (82 FR 10313). As noted, the Coast
                                                    SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil.                           done, one commenter supported
                                                                                                                                                                   Guard has the authority and ability to
                                                    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                              continuing with the rule so long as an
                                                                                                                                                                   manage vessel traffic in the Puget Sound
                                                                                                            environmental impact study is
                                                    I. Table of Abbreviations                                                                                      in a safe and effective manner. We are
                                                                                                            conducted, and four commenters made
                                                                                                                                                                   committed to improving the
                                                    FR Federal Register                                     no affirmative or negative comment on
                                                                                                                                                                   navigational safety of all Puget Sound
                                                    NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking                      withdrawal of the proposed rule, but
                                                                                                                                                                   waterway users, and will continually
                                                                                                            requested an environmental impact
                                                    II. Background                                                                                                 consider ways to do so in an effective
                                                                                                            statement. The Coast Guard is
                                                       We published a notice of proposed                                                                           and least burdensome manner
                                                                                                            withdrawing its proposed rulemaking
                                                    rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal                                                                               consistent with tribal treaty fishing
                                                                                                            based on the comments received and in
                                                    Register on February 10, 2017 (82 FR                                                                           rights.
                                                                                                            order to better analyze the impacts to
                                                    10313), entitled ‘‘Anchorages; Captain                  tribal treaty rights, especially treaty                  Dated: April 23, 2018.
                                                    of the Port Puget Sound Zone, WA.’’ In                  fishing rights.                                        David G. Throop,
                                                    the NPRM, we proposed the creation of                      All commenters requested or                         Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
                                                    several new anchorages, holding areas,                  emphasized the importance of an                        Thirteenth Coast Guard District.
                                                    and a non-anchorage area as well as the                 environmental impact statement. The                    [FR Doc. 2018–08871 Filed 4–26–18; 8:45 am]
                                                    expansion of one existing general                       Coast Guard will follow all applicable                 BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
                                                    anchorage in the Puget Sound area, as                   laws and regulations, including the
                                                    detailed in the proposed regulatory text.               National Environmental Policy Act,
                                                    The Coast Guard received feedback from                  with respect to any anchorages                         DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
                                                    concerned citizens, commercial entities,                rulemaking in the Puget Sound that may
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with PROPOSALS




                                                                                                                                                                   AFFAIRS
                                                    environmental groups, and from Indian                   be conducted in the future.
                                                    Tribal Governments and tribal officials                    Two commenters requested the Coast                  38 CFR Part 9
                                                    regarding the proposed rulemaking.                      Guard conduct an environmental impact
                                                    These comments were made available in                   statement on the use of uncodified                     RIN 2900–AQ12
                                                    the docket. Based on the information                    anchorages before withdrawing the                      Veterans’ Group Life Insurance
                                                    received from the tribes in the docket,                 current proposed rule. The Coast                       Increased Coverage
                                                    the Coast Guard is withdrawing the                      Guard’s withdrawal of the proposed
                                                    proposed rulemaking at this time so as                  anchorage rule is not a government                     AGENCY:   Department of Veterans Affairs.


                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   14:38 Apr 26, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00032   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\27APP1.SGM   27APP1



Document Created: 2018-04-27 01:46:18
Document Modified: 2018-04-27 01:46:18
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionProposed Rules
ActionNotice of proposed rulemaking; withdrawal.
DatesThe notice of proposed rulemaking is withdrawn on April 27, 2018.
ContactIf you have questions about this notice of inquiry, call or email LCDR Christina Sullivan, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Puget Sound; telephone 206-217-6042, email [email protected]
FR Citation83 FR 18491 
RIN Number1625-AA01

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR