83 FR 18732 - Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 83 (April 30, 2018)

Page Range		18732-18734
FR Document		2018-08646
We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The Boeing Company Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of cracks found in the main landing gear (MLG) beam forward support fitting. This AD requires repetitive inspections for cracking of the MLG beam forward support fitting, and applicable on-condition actions. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 83 (Monday, April 30, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 83 (Monday, April 30, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18732-18734]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-08646]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2017-1248; Product Identifier 2017-NM-162-AD; Amendment 
39-19257; AD 2018-09-01]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The 
Boeing Company Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500 series 
airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of cracks found in the main 
landing gear (MLG) beam forward support fitting. This AD requires 
repetitive inspections for cracking of the MLG beam forward support 
fitting, and applicable on-condition actions. We are issuing this AD to 
address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective June 4, 2018.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by 
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of June 4, 
2018.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule, 
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data 
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 
90740-5600; telephone 562-797-1717; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this service information at the 
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. 
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 
206-231-3195. It is also available on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
1248.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
1248; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains 
this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and 
other information. The address for Docket Operations (phone: 800-647-
5527) is Docket Operations, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Payman Soltani, Aerospace Engineer, 
Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount 
Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-5313; fax: 562-627-
5210; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all The Boeing Company 
Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes. The 
NPRM published in the Federal Register on January 17, 2018 (83 FR 
2375). The NPRM was prompted by reports of cracks found in the MLG beam 
forward support fitting. The NPRM proposed to require repetitive 
inspections for cracking of the MLG beam forward support fitting, and 
applicable on-condition actions.
    We are issuing this AD to address cracking of the MLG beam forward 
support fitting on the inboard side of the wing buttock line (WBL) 157 
rib. Undetected cracks could lead to a fuel leak, the inability of a 
principal structural element to carry limit load, or an MLG collapse 
that could prevent continued safe flight and landing.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing 
this final rule. The following presents the comments received on the 
NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment. The Boeing

[[Page 18733]]

Company had no objections to the NPRM.

Effect of Winglets on Accomplishment of the Proposed Actions

    Aviation Partners Boeing stated that accomplishing the Supplemental 
Type Certificate (STC) ST01219SE does not affect the actions specified 
in the NPRM.
    We concur with the commenter. We have redesignated paragraph (c) of 
the proposed AD as paragraph (c)(1) of this AD and added paragraph 
(c)(2) to this AD to state that installation of STC ST01219SE does not 
affect the ability to accomplish the actions required by this AD. 
Therefore, for airplanes on which STC ST01219SE is installed, a 
``change in product'' alternative method of compliance (AMOC) approval 
request is not necessary to comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 
39.17.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, 
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting 
this final rule with the change described previously and minor 
editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the 
NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was 
already proposed in the NPRM.
    We also determined that these changes will not increase the 
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this final 
rule.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-57A1334, dated 
September 26, 2017. The service information describes procedures for 
repetitive high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspections for cracking 
of the MLG beam forward support fitting around the fastener locations 
common to the rear spar web, below the upper chord on the inboard side 
of the WBL 157 rib, and applicable on-condition actions (e.g., repair). 
This service information is reasonably available because the interested 
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by 
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 160 airplanes of U.S. registry. We 
estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                 Cost on U.S.
             Action                   Labor cost         Parts cost      Cost per product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HFEC inspections...............  Up to 81 work-hours               $0  Up to $6,885 per      Up to $1,101,600
                                  x $85 per hour = Up                   inspection cycle.     per inspection
                                  to $6,885 per                                               cycle.
                                  inspection cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide 
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this AD. 
Because the number of work-hours can vary widely, depending on the 
inspection findings, these figures were not included in the service 
information.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, 
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General 
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with 
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing 
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator 
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within 
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition 
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this 
rulemaking action.
    This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the 
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by 
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is 
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but 
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the 
authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes and 
associated appliances to the Director of the System Oversight Division.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, 
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or 
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various 
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive 
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness 
directive (AD):

2018-09-01 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-19257; Docket No. FAA-
2017-1248; Product Identifier 2017-NM-162-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective June 4, 2018.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

[[Page 18734]]

(c) Applicability

    (1) This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 737-100, -
200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes, certificated in 
any category.
    (2) Installation of Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) 
ST01219SE (http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/
rgstc.nsf/0/ebd1cec7b301293e86257cb30045557a/$FILE/ST01219SE.pdf) 
does not affect the ability to accomplish the actions required by 
this AD. Therefore, for airplanes on which STC ST01219SE is 
installed, a ``change in product'' alternative method of compliance 
(AMOC) approval request is not necessary to comply with the 
requirements of 14 CFR 39.17.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57, Wings.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by the report of a crack indication in the 
main landing gear (MLG) beam forward support fitting on the inboard 
side of the wing buttock line (WBL) 157 rib, and multiple reports of 
similar crack findings on other airplanes. We are issuing this AD to 
address cracking of the MLG beam forward support fitting on the 
inboard side of the WBL 157 rib. Undetected cracks could lead to a 
fuel leak, the inability of a principal structural element to carry 
limit load, or an MLG collapse that could prevent continued safe 
flight and landing.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, 
unless already done.

(g) Required Actions

    (1) For Group 1 airplanes identified in Boeing Alert Service 
Bulletin 737-57A1334, dated September 26, 2017: Within 120 days 
after the effective date of this AD, inspect the airplane and do all 
applicable corrective actions using a method approved in accordance 
with the procedures specified in paragraph (i) of this AD.
    (2) For Group 2 airplanes identified in Boeing Alert Service 
Bulletin 737-57A1334, dated September 26, 2017: Except as required 
by paragraph (h) of this AD, at the applicable times specified in 
paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 
737-57A1334, dated September 26, 2017, do all applicable actions 
identified as ``RC'' (required for compliance) in, and in accordance 
with, the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service 
Bulletin 737-57A1334, dated September 26, 2017.

(h) Exceptions to Service Information Specifications

    (1) For purposes of determining compliance with the requirements 
of this AD: Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-57A1334, dated 
September 26, 2017, uses the phrase ``the original issue date of 
this service bulletin,'' this AD requires using ``the effective date 
of this AD.''
    (2) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-57A1334, dated 
September 26, 2017, specifies contacting Boeing, and specifies that 
action as RC: This AD requires repair using a method approved in 
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (i) of this 
AD.

 (i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority 
to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures 
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your 
request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards 
District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to 
the manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of 
the person identified in paragraph (j) of this AD. Information may 
be emailed to: [email protected].
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate 
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding 
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD 
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization 
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the 
Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, to make those findings. To be 
approved, the repair method, modification deviation, or alteration 
deviation must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the 
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
    (4) Except as required by paragraph (h)(2) of this AD: For 
service information that contains steps that are labeled as RC, the 
provisions of paragraphs (i)(4)(i) and (i)(4)(ii) of this AD apply.
    (i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step 
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply 
with the AD. If a step or substep is labeled ``RC Exempt,'' then the 
RC requirement is removed from that step or substep. An AMOC is 
required for any deviations to RC steps, including substeps and 
identified figures.
    (ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted 
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection 
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC 
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done 
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy 
condition.

(j) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Payman Soltani, 
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch, 
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-
5313; fax: 562-627-5210; email: [email protected].

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the 
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed 
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do 
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-57A1334, dated September 
26, 2017.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact 
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services 
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-
5600; telephone 562-797-1717; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport 
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For 
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 
206-231-3195.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated 
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration 
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at 
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on April 11, 2018.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-08646 Filed 4-27-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 83 / Monday, April 30, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 18733

Company had no objections to the Conclusion 26, 2017. The service information
NPRM. We reviewed the relevant data, describes procedures for repetitive high
considered the comments received, and frequency eddy current (HFEC)
Effect of Winglets on Accomplishment
determined that air safety and the inspections for cracking of the MLG
of the Proposed Actions
public interest require adopting this beam forward support fitting around the
Aviation Partners Boeing stated that final rule with the change described fastener locations common to the rear
accomplishing the Supplemental Type previously and minor editorial changes. spar web, below the upper chord on the
Certificate (STC) ST01219SE does not We have determined that these minor inboard side of the WBL 157 rib, and
affect the actions specified in the changes: applicable on-condition actions (e.g.,
NPRM. • Are consistent with the intent that repair). This service information is
was proposed in the NPRM for reasonably available because the
We concur with the commenter. We
addressing the unsafe condition; and interested parties have access to it
have redesignated paragraph (c) of the • Do not add any additional burden
proposed AD as paragraph (c)(1) of this through their normal course of business
upon the public than was already
AD and added paragraph (c)(2) to this or by the means identified in the
proposed in the NPRM.
AD to state that installation of STC ADDRESSES section.
We also determined that these
ST01219SE does not affect the ability to changes will not increase the economic Costs of Compliance
accomplish the actions required by this burden on any operator or increase the
AD. Therefore, for airplanes on which scope of this final rule. We estimate that this AD affects 160
STC ST01219SE is installed, a ‘‘change airplanes of U.S. registry. We estimate
in product’’ alternative method of Related Service Information Under 1
the following costs to comply with this
compliance (AMOC) approval request is CFR Part 51
AD:
not necessary to comply with the We reviewed Boeing Alert Service
requirements of 14 CFR 39.17. Bulletin 737–57A1334, dated September

ESTIMATED COSTS
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product Cost on U.S. operators

HFEC inspections ...... Up to 81 work-hours × $85 per $0 Up to $6,885 per inspection Up to $1,101,600 per inspection
hour = Up to $6,885 per in- cycle. cycle.
spection cycle.

We have received no definitive data Director, Aircraft Certification Service, under the criteria of the Regulatory
that would enable us to provide cost as authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. Flexibility Act.
estimates for the on-condition actions In accordance with that order, issuance
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
specified in this AD. Because the of ADs is normally a function of the
number of work-hours can vary widely, Compliance and Airworthiness Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
depending on the inspection findings, Division, but during this transition safety, Incorporation by reference,
these figures were not included in the period, the Executive Director has Safety.
service information. delegated the authority to issue ADs
applicable to transport category Adoption of the Amendment
Authority for This Rulemaking
airplanes and associated appliances to Accordingly, under the authority
Title 49 of the United States Code the Director of the System Oversight delegated to me by the Administrator,
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue Division. the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, follows:
section 106, describes the authority of Regulatory Findings
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: This AD will not have federalism PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
Aviation Programs, describes in more implications under Executive Order DIRECTIVES
detail the scope of the Agency’s 13132. This AD will not have a
authority. substantial direct effect on the States, on ■ 1. The authority citation for part 39
We are issuing this rulemaking under the relationship between the national continues to read as follows:
the authority described in Subtitle VII, government and the States, or on the
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: distribution of power and
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that responsibilities among the various § 39.13 [Amended]
section, Congress charges the FAA with levels of government.
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in For the reasons discussed above, I ■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
air commerce by prescribing regulations certify that this AD: the following new airworthiness
for practices, methods, and procedures (1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory directive (AD):
the Administrator finds necessary for action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 2018–09–01 The Boeing Company:
safety in air commerce. This regulation (2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Amendment 39–19257; Docket No.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES

is within the scope of that authority DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures FAA–2017–1248; Product Identifier
because it addresses an unsafe condition (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), 2017–NM–162–AD.
that is likely to exist or develop on (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation (a) Effective Date
products identified in this rulemaking in Alaska, and This AD is effective June 4, 2018.
action. (4) Will not have a significant
This AD is issued in accordance with economic impact, positive or negative, (b) Affected ADs
authority delegated by the Executive on a substantial number of small entities None.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:01 Apr 27, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30APR1.SGM 30APR1
Document Created: 2018-04-28 01:03:44
Document Modified: 2018-04-28 01:03:44
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Final rule.
Dates		This AD is effective June 4, 2018.
Contact		Payman Soltani, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-5313; fax: 562-627- 5210; email: [email protected]
FR Citation		83 FR 18732
RIN Number		2120-AA64
CFR Associated		Air Transportation; Aircraft; Aviation Safety; Incorporation by Reference and Safety
83 FR 18732 - Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONFederal Aviation Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 83 (April 30, 2018)

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
