83 FR 19184 - Delegation of Authority to North Carolina and the Western North Carolina Regional Air Quality Agency of Federal Plan for Existing Sewage Sludge Incineration Units
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 85 (May 2, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 85 (May 2, 2018)
| Page Range | 19184-19186 | |
| FR Document | 2018-09202 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 2, 2018)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 19184-19186] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-09202] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 62 [EPA-R04-OAR-2018-0119; FRL-9977-22--Region 4] Delegation of Authority to North Carolina and the Western North Carolina Regional Air Quality Agency of Federal Plan for Existing Sewage Sludge Incineration Units AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The EPA is providing notice of and is codifying its prior approval of requests submitted by the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ), through its Division of Air Quality, and the Western North Carolina Regional Air Quality Agency (WNCRAQA) for delegation of authority to implement and enforce the Federal plan for existing affected Sewage Sludge Incineration (SSI) units. The Federal plan establishes emission limits and monitoring, operating, and recordkeeping requirements for SSI units constructed on or before October 14, 2010. NCDEQ and WNCRAQA representatives have signed separate but similar Memoranda of Agreement (MOAs), each of which constitutes the mechanism for the transfer of authority from the EPA to each respective air pollution control agency. The MOAs and the corresponding delegations of authority were effective upon signature by the Regional Administrator on April 2, 2018. The MOAs delineate policies, responsibilities, and procedures by which the Federal plan will be administered and enforced by the NCDEQ and WNCRAQA, respectively, as well as the authorities retained by the EPA. DATES: This rule is effective on June 1, 2018. ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket Identification No. EPA-R04-OAR-2018-0119. The index to the docket for this action is available electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region 4, 61 Forsyth St. SW, Atlanta, Georgia. While all documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material), and some may not be publicly available at either location (e.g., confidential business information). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Bloeth, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia, 30303-8960. Mr. Bloeth can be reached via telephone at (404) 562-9013 and via electronic mail at [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background Section 129 of the Clean Air Act (the ``CAA'' or ``Act''), titled ``Solid Waste Combustion,'' requires the EPA to develop and adopt standards for solid waste incineration units pursuant to sections 111(d) and 129 of the Act. On March 21, 2011, the EPA promulgated new source performance standards (NSPS) and emissions guidelines (EG) for SSI units located at wastewater treatment facilities designed to treat domestic sewage sludge. See 76 FR 15372. Codified at 40 CFR part 60, subparts LLLL and MMMM, these final rules set limits for nine pollutants under section 129 of the CAA: Cadmium (Cd), carbon monoxide (CO), hydrogen chloride (HCl), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), nitrogen oxides (NOX ), particulate matter (PM), polychlorinated dibenzo-p- dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDDs/PCFDs), and sulfur dioxide (SO2 ). The EG apply to existing SSI units, which are those units that commenced construction on or before October 14, 2010. See 40 CFR 60.5060. CAA section 129 also requires each state in which SSI units are operating to submit a plan to implement and enforce the EG with respect to such units. State plan requirements must be ``at least as protective'' as the EG and become federally enforceable upon approval by [[Page 19185]] the EPA. The procedures for adoption and submittal of state plans are codified in 40 CFR part 60, subpart B. The SSI EG include a model rule that states may use to develop their own plans. On April 29, 2016, the EPA finalized a Federal plan that implements the EG in states that do not have an approved state plan. 81 FR 26040. EPA implementation and enforcement of the Federal plan is viewed as an interim measure until states assume their role as the preferred implementers of the EG requirements stipulated in the Federal plan. Accordingly, the EPA encourages states to either develop their own plan (the EG model rule or the Federal plan can be used as a template to reduce the effort needed to develop a plan), or to request delegation of the Federal plan, as the NCDEQ and WNCRAQA have done. State plans and requests for delegations of authority that have been approved by EPA are reflected in the Code of Federal Regulations at 40 CFR part 62, subparts B through DDD. II. Submittal and EPA Approval of Requests for Delegation of the Federal Plan On December 9, 2016, and February 7, 2017, the NCDEQ and WNCRAQA, respectively, requested delegation of authority from EPA to implement and enforce the Federal plan for existing SSI units, codified at 40 CFR part 62 subpart LLL. The scope of the request from the NCDEQ included all affected facilities within the State of North Carolina, except Buncombe County and the City of Asheville. The WNCRAQA submitted a separate delegation request which included all affected facilities within Buncombe County and the City of Asheville. The delegation of authority does not apply to sources located in Indian Country. The EPA evaluates requests for delegation of the SSI Federal plan pursuant to the provisions of the SSI Federal plan and the EPA's Delegations Manual. Pursuant to the SSI Federal plan, a state may meet its CAA section 111(d)/129 obligations by submitting an acceptable written request for delegation of the Federal plan that includes the following elements: (1) A demonstration of adequate resources and legal authority to administer and enforce the Federal plan; (2) an inventory of affected SSI units, an inventory of emissions from affected SSI units, and provisions for state progress reports (see items under 40 CFR[thinsp]60.5015(a)(1), (2) and (7) from the SSI EG); (3) certification that the hearing on the state delegation request, similar to the hearing for a state plan submittal, was held, a list of witnesses and their organizational affiliations, if any, appearing at the hearing, and a brief written summary of each presentation or written submission; and (4) a commitment to enter into a MOA with the Regional Administrator that sets forth the terms, conditions, and effective date of the delegation and that serves as the mechanism for the transfer of authority. 40 CFR 62.15865; see also 81 FR 26060-61. The NCDEQ and the WNCRAQA met delegation requirements (1) through (3) described above, as well as requirement (4), which is addressed below. Pursuant to the EPA's Delegations Manual, item 7-139, Implementation and Enforcement of 111(d)(2) and 111(d)(2)/129(b)(3) Federal Plans, a copy of which is included in the Supporting Documents for this action, the Regional Administrator is authorized to delegate authority to implement and enforce section 111(d)/129 Federal plans to states. Whereas a state plan implementing the EG must be submitted by the state, a local agency may directly request delegation of authority to implement the SSI Federal plan with respect to sources within its jurisdiction, provided it has authority under state law to do so and has met the delegation requirements identified above. See 81 FR 26054- 55. The requirements and limitations of a delegation agreement are set forth in item 7-139. Consistent with those requirements, the EPA prepared MOAs between the EPA and the NCDEQ and between the EPA and the WNCRAQA, each of which defines policies, responsibilities, and procedures pursuant to the SSI Federal plan by which the Federal plan will be administered by each agency. Subsequently, on January 30, 2018, Michael S. Regan, Secretary of the NCDEQ, and on January 12, 2018, David A. Brigman, Director of the WNCRAQA, signed the respective MOAs, thus agreeing to the terms and conditions of the MOAs and accepting responsibility for implementation and enforcement of the policies and procedures of the Federal plan, except for certain authorities (e.g., approval of major alternatives to test methods or monitoring) retained by the EPA. The EPA continues to retain enforcement authority along with the NCDEQ and the WNCRAQA. The MOAs, and resulting delegation of authority, became effective upon signature by the Regional Administrator on April 2, 2018. III. EPA Action In this action, EPA is notifying the public of and is codifying its delegation of authority to implement and enforce the Federal plan to the NCDEQ and WNCRAQA. The Code of Federal Regulations is being amended as indicated below. IV. Good Cause Finding Section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) requires publication of notice of proposed rulemaking and specifies what the notice shall include. See 5 U.S.C. 553(b). However, the APA provides an exception from this requirement ``when the agency for good cause finds (and incorporates the finding and a brief statement of reasons therefor in the rules issued) that notice and public procedure thereon are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B). The EPA has found good cause for making today's action final without prior proposal and opportunity for comment because this ministerial action merely codifies EPA's delegation of authority to implement and enforce the SSI Federal plan to the NCDEQ and the WNCRAQA. This action does not alter the universe of sources regulated under the Federal plan, nor does it change the regulatory requirements applicable to those sources. In these circumstances, notice and comment procedures are unnecessary. V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator has the authority to delegate the authority to implement a Federal 111(d)/129 plan that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations. See 40 CFR 60.27. In reviewing 111(d)/129 Federal plan delegation requests, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA and of EPA's implementing regulations. Accordingly, this action merely codifies in the Code of Federal Regulations EPA's delegation of authority to implement the Federal plan and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by the already- applicable Federal plan. For that reason, this action:Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities [[Page 19186]] under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); and Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). In addition, this rule is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA. It also does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). This action does not apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. As such, it does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62 Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Air pollution control, Aluminum, Fertilizers, Fluoride, Intergovernmental relations, Manufacturing, Phosphate, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Waste treatment and disposal. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: April 2, 2018. Onis ``Trey'' Glenn, III, Regional Administrator, Region 4. 40 CFR part 62 is amended as follows: PART 62--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF STATE PLANS FOR DESIGNATED FACILITIES AND POLLUTANTS 0 1. The authority citation for part 62 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart II--North Carolina 0 2. Add an undesignated center heading and Sec. Sec. 62.8362 and 62.8363 to subpart II to read as follows: Air Emissions From Existing Sewage Sludge Incinerators (SSI)--Section 111(d)/129 Plan Sec. 62.8362 Identification of plan--North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality. (a) Delegation of authority. On April 2, 2018, the EPA signed a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) that defines policies, responsibilities, and procedures pursuant to 40 CFR part 62, subpart LLL (the ``Federal plan'') by which the Federal plan will be administered by the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ). (b) Identification of sources. The MOA and related Federal plan apply to all affected SSI units for which construction commenced on or before October 14, 2010. (c) Effective date of delegation. The delegation became fully effective on April 2, 2018, the effective date of the MOA between the EPA and the NCDEQ. Sec. 62.8363 Identification of plan--Western North Carolina Regional Air Quality Agency. (a) Delegation of authority. On April 2, 2018, the EPA signed a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) that defines policies, responsibilities, and procedures pursuant to 40 CFR part 62, subpart LLL (the ``Federal plan'') by which the Federal plan will be administered by the Western North Carolina Regional Air Quality Agency (WNCRAQA). (b) Identification of sources. The MOA and related Federal plan apply to all affected SSI units for which construction commenced on or before October 14, 2010. (c) Effective date of delegation. The delegation became fully effective on April 2, 2018, the effective date of the MOA between the EPA and the WNCRAQA. [FR Doc. 2018-09202 Filed 5-1-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![19184 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 2, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May Dated: April 19, 2018. administration of Class I administrative
22, 2001) because it is not likely to have R.D. James, penalty orders under Section 309(g) of
a significant adverse effect on the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works). the Clean Water Act, judicially-imposed
supply, distribution, or use of energy. civil penalties under Section 404(s) of
For the reasons set forth in the the Clean Water Act, and Section 205 of
This rule relates only to the adjustments
preamble, the Corps amends 33 CFR the National Fishing Enhancement Act.
to civil penalties to account for
part 326 as follows: Under Section 309(g)(2)(A) of the Clean
inflation. This rule is consistent with
current agency practice, does not PART 326—ENFORCEMENT Water Act, Class I civil penalties may
impose new substantive requirements, not exceed $21,394 per violation, except
and therefore will not have a significant ■ 1. The authority citation for part 326 that the maximum amount of any Class
adverse effect on the supply, continues to read as follows: I civil penalty shall not exceed $53,484.
distribution, or use of energy. Authority: 33 U.S.C. 401 et seq.; 33 U.S.C. Under Section 404(s)(4) of the Clean
1344; 33 U.S.C. 1413; 33 U.S.C. 2104; 33 Water Act, judicially-imposed civil
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 326 U.S.C. 1319; 28 U.S.C. 2461 note. penalties may not exceed $53,484 per
■ 2. Amend § 326.6 by revising day for each violation. Under Section
Administrative practice and
paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows: 205(e) of the National Fishing
procedure, Intergovernmental relations, Enhancement Act, penalties for
Investigations, Law enforcement, § 326.6 Class I administrative penalties. violations of permits issued in
Navigation (water), Water pollution (a) Introduction. (1) This section sets accordance with that Act shall not
control, Waterways. forth procedures for initiation and exceed $23,426 for each violation.
Statutory civil monetary penalty amount for violations that occurred
Environmental statute and U.S. Code citation after November 2, 2015, and are assessed on or after May 2, 2018
Clean Water Act (CWA), Section 309(g)(2)(A), 33 U.S.C. 1319(g)(2)(A) $21,394 per violation, with a maximum of $53,484.
CWA, Section 404(s)(4), 33 U.S.C. 1344(s)(4) ........................................ Maximum of $53,484 per day for each violation.
National Fishing Enhancement Act, Section 205(e), 33 U.S.C. 2104(e) Maximum of $23,426 per violation.
* * * * * (MOAs), each of which constitutes the and via electronic mail at bloeth.mark@
[FR Doc. 2018–09316 Filed 5–1–18; 8:45 am] mechanism for the transfer of authority epa.gov.
BILLING CODE 3720–58–P from the EPA to each respective air SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
pollution control agency. The MOAs
and the corresponding delegations of I. Background
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION authority were effective upon signature Section 129 of the Clean Air Act (the
AGENCY by the Regional Administrator on April ‘‘CAA’’ or ‘‘Act’’), titled ‘‘Solid Waste
2, 2018. The MOAs delineate policies, Combustion,’’ requires the EPA to
40 CFR Part 62 responsibilities, and procedures by develop and adopt standards for solid
which the Federal plan will be waste incineration units pursuant to
[EPA–R04–OAR–2018–0119; FRL–9977–
22—Region 4]
administered and enforced by the sections 111(d) and 129 of the Act. On
NCDEQ and WNCRAQA, respectively, March 21, 2011, the EPA promulgated
Delegation of Authority to North as well as the authorities retained by the new source performance standards
Carolina and the Western North EPA. (NSPS) and emissions guidelines (EG)
Carolina Regional Air Quality Agency DATES: This rule is effective on June 1, for SSI units located at wastewater
of Federal Plan for Existing Sewage 2018. treatment facilities designed to treat
Sludge Incineration Units domestic sewage sludge. See 76 FR
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
AGENCY: Environmental Protection 15372. Codified at 40 CFR part 60,
docket for this action under Docket
Agency (EPA). subparts LLLL and MMMM, these final
Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR–
rules set limits for nine pollutants under
ACTION: Final rule. 2018–0119. The index to the docket for
section 129 of the CAA: Cadmium (Cd),
this action is available electronically at
SUMMARY: The EPA is providing notice carbon monoxide (CO), hydrogen
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
of and is codifying its prior approval of chloride (HCl), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg),
at EPA Region 4, 61 Forsyth St. SW,
requests submitted by the North nitrogen oxides (NOX), particulate
Atlanta, Georgia. While all documents
Carolina Department of Environmental matter (PM), polychlorinated dibenzo-p-
in the docket are listed in the index,
Quality (NCDEQ), through its Division dioxins and polychlorinated
some information may be publicly
of Air Quality, and the Western North dibenzofurans (PCDDs/PCFDs), and
available only at the hard copy location
Carolina Regional Air Quality Agency sulfur dioxide (SO2). The EG apply to
(e.g., copyrighted material), and some
(WNCRAQA) for delegation of authority existing SSI units, which are those units
may not be publicly available at either
to implement and enforce the Federal that commenced construction on or
location (e.g., confidential business
plan for existing affected Sewage Sludge before October 14, 2010. See 40 CFR
information).
Incineration (SSI) units. The Federal 60.5060.
plan establishes emission limits and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: CAA section 129 also requires each
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
monitoring, operating, and Mark Bloeth, Air, Pesticides and Toxics state in which SSI units are operating to
recordkeeping requirements for SSI Management Division, U.S. submit a plan to implement and enforce
units constructed on or before October Environmental Protection Agency the EG with respect to such units. State
14, 2010. NCDEQ and WNCRAQA Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, plan requirements must be ‘‘at least as
representatives have signed separate but Georgia, 30303–8960. Mr. Bloeth can be protective’’ as the EG and become
similar Memoranda of Agreement reached via telephone at (404) 562–9013 federally enforceable upon approval by
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:16 May 01, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\02MYR1.SGM 02MYR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_19269/page/1.svg)
![19186 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 2, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 Dated: April 2, 2018. (b) Identification of sources. The
U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Onis ‘‘Trey’’ Glenn, III, MOA and related Federal plan apply to
• Does not contain any unfunded Regional Administrator, Region 4. all affected SSI units for which
mandate or significantly or uniquely 40 CFR part 62 is amended as follows: construction commenced on or before
affect small governments, as described October 14, 2010.
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act PART 62—APPROVAL AND (c) Effective date of delegation. The
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); PROMULGATION OF STATE PLANS delegation became fully effective on
FOR DESIGNATED FACILITIES AND April 2, 2018, the effective date of the
• Does not have Federalism POLLUTANTS MOA between the EPA and the
implications as specified in Executive WNCRAQA.
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, ■ 1. The authority citation for part 62 [FR Doc. 2018–09202 Filed 5–1–18; 8:45 am]
1999); continues to read as follows:
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
• Is not an economically significant Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order Subpart II—North Carolina
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
■ 2. Add an undesignated center
and COMMISSION
heading and §§ 62.8362 and 62.8363 to
• Is not a significant regulatory action subpart II to read as follows:
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 47 CFR Parts 1 and 73
28355, May 22, 2001). Air Emissions From Existing Sewage
Sludge Incinerators (SSI)—Section [MB Docket No. 17–106; DA 18–326]
In addition, this rule is not subject to 111(d)/129 Plan
requirements of section 12(d) of the Elimination of Main Studio Rule;
National Technology Transfer and § 62.8362 Identification of plan—North
Carolina Department of Environmental
Petition for Partial Reconsideration
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) because application of those Quality. AGENCY: Federal Communications
requirements would be inconsistent (a) Delegation of authority. On April Commission.
with the CAA. It also does not provide 2, 2018, the EPA signed a Memorandum
ACTION: Dismissal and denial of petition
EPA with the discretionary authority to of Agreement (MOA) that defines
policies, responsibilities, and for partial reconsideration.
address, as appropriate,
disproportionate human health or procedures pursuant to 40 CFR part 62, SUMMARY: This document dismisses and
environmental effects, using practicable subpart LLL (the ‘‘Federal plan’’) by otherwise denies the Petition for
and legally permissible methods, under which the Federal plan will be Reconsideration filed by De La Hunt
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, administered by the North Carolina Broadcasting Corp. The Commission’s
February 16, 1994). Department of Environmental Quality
rules provide that a petition for
(NCDEQ).
This action does not apply on any reconsideration which relies on facts or
(b) Identification of sources. The
Indian reservation land or in any other MOA and related Federal plan apply to arguments not previously presented to
area where EPA or an Indian tribe has all affected SSI units for which the Commission will only be granted if
demonstrated that a tribe has construction commenced on or before one of three circumstances is present,
jurisdiction. As such, it does not have October 14, 2010. and the Media Bureau concludes that
tribal implications as specified by (c) Effective date of delegation. The none of the specified circumstances is
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, delegation became fully effective on present here. Because this is a fact-
November 9, 2000), nor will it impose April 2, 2018, the effective date of the specific inquiry, and not an issue of
substantial direct costs on tribal MOA between the EPA and the NCDEQ. general applicability, a waiver request is
governments or preempt tribal law. the proper means for considering this
§ 62.8363 Identification of plan—Western issue, and De La Hunt states that it has
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62 North Carolina Regional Air Quality Agency. already requested such a waiver from
(a) Delegation of authority. On April the Media Bureau.
Environmental protection, 2, 2018, the EPA signed a Memorandum
Administrative practice and procedure, DATES: May 2, 2018.
of Agreement (MOA) that defines
Air pollution control, Aluminum, policies, responsibilities, and ADDRESSES: Federal Communications
Fertilizers, Fluoride, Intergovernmental procedures pursuant to 40 CFR part 62, Commission, 445 12th Street SW,
relations, Manufacturing, Phosphate, subpart LLL (the ‘‘Federal plan’’) by Washington, DC 20554.
Reporting and recordkeeping which the Federal plan will be FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Waste administered by the Western North Diana Sokolow, Diana.Sokolow@fcc.gov,
treatment and disposal. Carolina Regional Air Quality Agency of the Policy Division, Media Bureau,
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. (WNCRAQA). (202) 418–2120.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:16 May 01, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\02MYR1.SGM 02MYR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_19269/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-05-02 00:49:30
Document Modified: 2018-05-02 00:49:30
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | This rule is effective on June 1, 2018. | |
| Contact | Mark Bloeth, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia, 30303-8960. Mr. Bloeth can be reached via telephone at (404) 562-9013 and via electronic mail at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 19184 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Administrative Practice and Procedure; Air Pollution Control; Aluminum; Fertilizers; Fluoride; Intergovernmental Relations; Manufacturing; Phosphate; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Sulfur Oxides and Waste Treatment and Disposal |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR