83 FR 19436 - Safety Zone; Straits of Mackinac, Mackinaw City, MI

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 86 (May 3, 2018)

Page Range		19436-19438
FR Document		2018-09407

The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for navigable waters within a 500-yard radius of construction equipment vessels conducting operations in the Straits of Mackinac. The safety zone is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from potential hazards created by surveillance and repair work to electric utility cables that cross the Straits of Mackinac. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie or a designated representative.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 86 (Thursday, May 3, 2018)

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 86 (Thursday, May 3, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 19436-19438]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-09407]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2018-0397]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Straits of Mackinac, Mackinaw City, MI

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for 
navigable waters within a 500-yard radius of construction equipment 
vessels conducting operations in the Straits of Mackinac. The safety 
zone is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine 
environment from potential hazards created by surveillance and repair 
work to electric utility cables that cross the Straits of Mackinac. 
Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless 
specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie 
or a designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from May 3, 2018 until October 30, 2018. 
It will be enforced with actual notice from April 30, 2018, until May 
3, 2018.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2018-0397 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email LTJG Sean V. Murphy, Sector Sault Sainte Marie Waterways 
Management Chief, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 906-635-3319, email 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code
ROV Remotely Operated Underwater Vehicle

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice 
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of 
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency, for good cause, finds that 
those procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the 
public interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that 
good cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking 
(NPRM) with respect to this rule because visual imagery and repair of 
damage to the utility cables is imperative to further mitigate any 
risks to the environment and the public. Emergent conditions require 
immediate marine surveying of the area due to damage to utility cables 
in the Straits of Mackinac. It is impractical to publish an NPRM 
because of the urgent need to survey the utility cables damaged.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause 
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after 
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of 
this rule would be impracticable because immediate action is needed to 
obtain visual imagery of damage to the utility cables in order to 
successfully effect repairs and further mitigate any risks to the 
environment and the public.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 
1231. The Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie (COTP) has determined 
that construction vessels operating in the Straits of Mackinac, will be 
a safety and navigation concern for any vessel within a 500-yard radius 
of the operations. This rule is needed to protect personnel, vessels, 
and the marine environment in the navigable waters within the safety 
zone while the operations are ongoing.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a safety zone from April 30, 2018 until 
October 30, 2018. The safety zone will cover all navigable waters 
within 500 yards of construction equipment vessel working and surveying 
damaged utility cables in the Straits of Mackinac. The duration of the 
zone is intended to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine 
environment in these navigable waters while operations are ongoing. The 
zone will be enforced at various times throughout this period. Local 
Broadcast Notice to mariners, via VHF-FM marine channel 16, will notify 
mariners when the construction vessels are conducting operations and 
the zone is being enforced. No vessel or person will be permitted to 
enter the safety zone

[[Page 19437]]

without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated 
representative.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control 
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been 
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt 
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size, and 
location of the safety zone. Vessel traffic will be able to safely 
transit around this safety zone which would impact a small designated 
area of the Straits of Mackinac during a time of year when vessel 
traffic is normally low. Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue a 
Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the 
zone, and the rule would allow vessels to seek permission to enter the 
zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
V.A. above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on 
any vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, which guide the 
Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is 
one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively 
have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves 
a safety zone that will prohibit entry within 500 yards of construction 
equipment vessels in the Straits of Mackinac surveying and conducting 
repairs to damaged utility cables. It is categorically excluded from 
further review under paragraph L60 (a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS 
Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A Record of Environmental 
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket 
where indicated under ADDRESSES.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 
6.04-6, and 160.5;

[[Page 19438]]

Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.


0
2. Add Sec.  165.T09-0397 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T09-0397  Safety Zone; Straits of Mackinac, Mackinaw City, 
MI.

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable 
waters of the Straits of Mackinac, from surface to bottom, within a 500 
yard radius around construction equipment vessels.
    (b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative 
means a Coast Guard petty officer, warrant officer, or commissioned 
officer and any Federal, State, and local officer designated by or 
assisting the Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie (COTP) in the 
enforcement of the safety zone.
    (c) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in 
subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in 
paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the 
COTP's designated representative.
    (2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's 
representative by VHF radio channel 16 or call 906-635-3319. Those in 
the safety zone must comply with all lawful orders or directions given 
to them by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
    (d) Enforcement periods. This section is effective from April 30, 
2018, until October 30, 2018. It will be enforced while construction 
vessels operate within the designated location in paragraph (a) of this 
section. Local Broadcast Notice to mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 
16 will notify mariners when vessels are conducting operations.

    Dated: April 30, 2018.
Marko R. Broz,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Sector Sault Sainte 
Marie.
[FR Doc. 2018-09407 Filed 5-2-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 86 / Thursday, May 3, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 19437

without obtaining permission from the Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
COTP or a designated representative. we want to assist small entities in The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
understanding this rule. If the rule of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
V. Regulatory Analyses
would affect your small business, Federal agencies to assess the effects of
We developed this rule after organization, or governmental
considering numerous statutes and their discretionary regulatory actions. In
jurisdiction and you have questions particular, the Act addresses actions
Executive orders related to rulemaking. concerning its provisions or options for
Below we summarize our analyses that may result in the expenditure by a
compliance, please contact the person State, local, or tribal government, in the
based on a number of these statutes and listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
Executive orders, and we discuss First aggregate, or by the private sector of
CONTACT section. $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
Amendment rights of protestors.
Small businesses may send comments more in any one year. Though this rule
A. Regulatory Planning and Review on the actions of Federal employees will not result in such an expenditure,
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 who enforce, or otherwise determine we do discuss the effects of this rule
direct agencies to assess the costs and compliance with, Federal regulations to elsewhere in this preamble.
benefits of available regulatory the Small Business and Agriculture F. Environment
alternatives and, if regulation is Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
necessary, to select regulatory and the Regional Small Business We have analyzed this rule under
approaches that maximize net benefits. Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Department of Homeland Security
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies Ombudsman evaluates these actions Directive 023–01 and Commandant
to control regulatory costs through a annually and rates each agency’s Instruction M16475.1D, which guide the
budgeting process. This rule has not responsiveness to small business. If you Coast Guard in complying with the
been designated a ‘‘significant wish to comment on actions by National Environmental Policy Act of
regulatory action,’’ under Executive employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The determined that this action is one of a
not been reviewed by the Office of Coast Guard will not retaliate against category of actions that do not
Management and Budget (OMB), and individually or cumulatively have a
small entities that question or complain
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt significant effect on the human
about this rule or any policy or action
from the requirements of Executive environment. This rule involves a safety
of the Coast Guard.
Order 13771. zone that will prohibit entry within 500
This regulatory action determination C. Collection of Information yards of construction equipment vessels
is based on the size, and location of the in the Straits of Mackinac surveying and
safety zone. Vessel traffic will be able to This rule will not call for a new conducting repairs to damaged utility
safely transit around this safety zone collection of information under the cables. It is categorically excluded from
which would impact a small designated Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 further review under paragraph L60 (a)
area of the Straits of Mackinac during a U.S.C. 3501–3520). of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
time of year when vessel traffic is D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01,
normally low. Moreover, the Coast Rev. 01. A Record of Environmental
Governments
Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice to Consideration supporting this
Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel A rule has implications for federalism determination is available in the docket
16 about the zone, and the rule would under Executive Order 13132, where indicated under ADDRESSES.
allow vessels to seek permission to enter Federalism, if it has a substantial direct G. Protest Activities
the zone. effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and The Coast Guard respects the First
B. Impact on Small Entities Amendment rights of protesters.
the States, or on the distribution of
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of power and responsibilities among the Protesters are asked to contact the
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, various levels of government. We have person listed in the FOR FURTHER
requires Federal agencies to consider INFORMATION CONTACT section to
analyzed this rule under that Order and
the potential impact of regulations on have determined that it is consistent coordinate protest activities so that your
small entities during rulemaking. The with the fundamental federalism message can be received without
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small jeopardizing the safety or security of
principles and preemption requirements
businesses, not-for-profit organizations people, places or vessels.
described in Executive Order 13132.
that are independently owned and List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
operated and are not dominant in their Also, this rule does not have tribal
fields, and governmental jurisdictions implications under Executive Order Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
with populations of less than 50,000. 13175, Consultation and Coordination (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. with Indian Tribal Governments, requirements, Security measures,
605(b) that this rule will not have a because it does not have a substantial Waterways.
significant economic impact on a direct effect on one or more Indian For the reasons discussed in the
substantial number of small entities. tribes, on the relationship between the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
While some owners or operators of Federal Government and Indian tribes, CFR part 165 as follows:
vessels intending to transit the safety or on the distribution of power and
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES

zone may be small entities, for the responsibilities between the Federal PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
reasons stated in section V.A. above, Government and Indian tribes. If you AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
this rule will not have a significant believe this rule has implications for
economic impact on any vessel owner federalism or Indian tribes, please ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165
or operator. contact the person listed in the FOR continues to read as follows:
Under section 213(a) of the Small FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
Business Regulatory Enforcement above. 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;

VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:59 May 02, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\03MYR1.SGM 03MYR1

19438 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 86 / Thursday, May 3, 2018 / Rules and Regulations

Department of Homeland Security Delegation SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Clean On March 6, 2018, we received six
No. 0170.1. Air Act (CAA or the Act), the anonymous public comments on the
■ 2. Add § 165.T09–0397 to read as Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed rulemaking action. The
follows: is approving portions of Louisiana’s comments are posted to the docket
State Implementation Plan (SIP) (EPA–R06–OAR–2015–0851). Several of
§ 165.T09–0397 Safety Zone; Straits of submittal and a technical supplement, the commenters provided the air quality
Mackinac, Mackinaw City, MI. that address a CAA requirement that index for March 2, 2018 for various
(a) Location. The following area is a SIPs account for potential interstate locations across the USA and compared
safety zone: All navigable waters of the transport of air pollution that them to various locations across Asia.
Straits of Mackinac, from surface to significantly contributes to Other commenters discussed the
bottom, within a 500 yard radius around nonattainment or interferes with shortcomings of the tariffs and conflict
construction equipment vessels. maintenance of the 2012 fine particulate minerals law. Such comments are not
(b) Definitions. As used in this matter (PM2.5) National Ambient Air relevant to the Clean Air requirements
section, designated representative Quality Standards (NAAQS) in other being addressed here and are outside
means a Coast Guard petty officer, states. EPA finds that emissions from the scope of this specific rule making
warrant officer, or commissioned officer Louisiana sources do not contribute action.
and any Federal, State, and local officer significantly to nonattainment in, or
designated by or assisting the Captain of interfere with maintenance by, any II. Final Action
the Port Sault Sainte Marie (COTP) in other state with regard to the 2012 PM2.5 We are approving the portions of the
the enforcement of the safety zone. NAAQS. December 11, 2015 Louisiana SIP
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general DATES: This rule is effective on June 4, revision pertaining to emissions that
safety zone regulations in subpart C of 2018. significantly contribute to
this part, you may not enter the safety ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a nonattainment or interfere with
zone described in paragraph (a) of this docket for this action under Docket ID maintenance of the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS
section unless authorized by the COTP No. EPA–R06–OAR–2015–0851. All in other states and the supplemental
or the COTP’s designated representative. documents in the docket are listed on information provided to us on July 7,
(2) To seek permission to enter, the http://www.regulations.gov website. 2017. We find that emissions from
contact the COTP or the COTP’s Although listed in the index, some Louisiana sources do not contribute
representative by VHF radio channel 16 information is not publicly available, significantly to nonattainment in, or
or call 906–635–3319. Those in the e.g., Confidential Business Information interfere with maintenance by, any
safety zone must comply with all lawful or other information whose disclosure is other state with regard to the 2012 PM2.5
orders or directions given to them by the restricted by statute. Certain other NAAQS.
COTP or the COTP’s designated material, such as copyrighted material,
representative. III. Statutory and Executive Order
is not placed on the internet and will be Reviews
(d) Enforcement periods. This section publicly available only in hard copy
is effective from April 30, 2018, until form. Publicly available docket Under the CAA, the Administrator is
October 30, 2018. It will be enforced materials are available either required to approve a SIP submission
while construction vessels operate electronically through http:// that complies with the provisions of the
within the designated location in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at Act and applicable Federal regulations.
paragraph (a) of this section. Local the EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Broadcast Notice to mariners via VHF– Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
FM marine channel 16 will notify FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
mariners when vessels are conducting Sherry Fuerst, 214–665–6454, provided that they meet the criteria of
operations. fuerst.sherry@epa.gov. the CAA. Accordingly, this action
Dated: April 30, 2018. merely approves state law as meeting
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Marko R. Broz, Federal requirements and does not
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
impose additional requirements beyond
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the and ‘‘our’’ means the EPA.
Port, Sector Sault Sainte Marie. those imposed by state law. For that
I. Background reason, this action:
[FR Doc. 2018–09407 Filed 5–2–18; 8:45 am]
The background for this action is • Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
discussed in detail in our February 1, action’’ subject to review by the Office
2018 proposal (83 FR 4617). In that of Management and Budget under
document we proposed to approve Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION portions of Louisiana’s State October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
AGENCY Implementation Plan (SIP) submittal January 21, 2011);
and a technical supplement, that • Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
40 CFR Part 52
address a CAA requirement that SIPs FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
[EPA–R06–OAR–2015–0851; FRL–9977– account for potential interstate transport action because SIP approvals are
02—Region 6] of air pollution that significantly exempted under Executive Order 12866;
contributes to nonattainment or • Does not impose an information
Approval and Promulgation of interferes with maintenance of the 2012 collection burden under the provisions
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES

Implementation Plans; Louisiana; PM2.5 NAAQS in other states. We of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
Interstate Transport Requirements for proposed to determine that emissions U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS from Louisiana sources do not • Is certified as not having a
AGENCY: Environmental Protection contribute significantly to significant economic impact on a
Agency (EPA). nonattainment in, or interfere with substantial number of small entities
maintenance by, any other state with under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
ACTION: Final rule.
regard to the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS. U.S.C. 601 et seq.);

VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:59 May 02, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\03MYR1.SGM 03MYR1

Document Created: 2018-05-02 23:48:33
Document Modified: 2018-05-02 23:48:33

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective from May 3, 2018 until October 30, 2018. It will be enforced with actual notice from April 30, 2018, until May 3, 2018.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email LTJG Sean V. Murphy, Sector Sault Sainte Marie Waterways Management Chief, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 906-635-3319, email [email protected]
FR Citation		83 FR 19436
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

83 FR 19436 - Safety Zone; Straits of Mackinac, Mackinaw City, MI

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 86 (May 3, 2018)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard