83 FR 19497 - Air Plan Approval; Michigan; Revisions to Part 9 Miscellaneous Rules
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 86 (May 3, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 86 (May 3, 2018)
| Page Range | 19497-19499 | |
| FR Document | 2018-09414 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 86 (Thursday, May 3, 2018)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 19497-19499] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-09414] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R05-OAR-2017-0100; FRL-9977-53-Region 5] Air Plan Approval; Michigan; Revisions to Part 9 Miscellaneous Rules AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a request submitted by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) on February 2, 2017, and supplemented on November 8, 2017, to revise the Michigan state implementation plan (SIP) for carbon monoxide (CO). The revision incorporates changes to Michigan's Air Pollution Control Rules entitled ``Emissions Limitations and Prohibitions--Miscellaneous.'' The revision updates existing source- specific rule requirements for ferrous cupola operations by removing obsolete rule language and makes a minor change to correct the citation to a Federal test method. The revision continues to result in attainment of the CO national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 4, 2018. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05- OAR-2017-0100 at http://www.regulations.gov or via email to [email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Hatten, Environmental Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-3031, [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,'' ``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information section is arranged as follows: I. What are the State rule revisions? II. Did the State hold public hearings for the submittal? III. What is EPA's analysis of the State's submittal? IV. What action is EPA taking? V. Incorporation by Reference VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. What are the State rule revisions? On February 2, 2017, MDEQ submitted a request to incorporate revisions to Michigan's Air Pollution Control Rules in Chapter 336, Part 9--Emissions Limitations and Prohibitions--Miscellaneous (Part 9) in the Michigan SIP. Michigan's submittal included revisions to three separate rules in Part 9: R 336.1902--``Adoption of standards by reference'' (rule 902); R 336.1916--``Affirmative defense for excess emissions during start-up or shutdown'' (rule 916); and R 336.1930-- ``Emission of carbon monoxide from ferrous cupola operations'' (rule 930). This rule will only take action on rule 930, while the revisions to rule 902 and 916 will be addressed separately. Michigan's rule 930 specifies CO emission limits for large ferrous cupola operations with a melting capacity of 20 tons or more per hour. The version of rule 930 currently approved into the Michigan SIP only applies to ferrous cupola operations in Saginaw, Macomb, Oakland, and Wayne Counties in Michigan.\1\ The rule is designed to require installation of afterburner control system, or equivalent, which reduces the CO emissions from the ferrous cupola by 90 percent. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ EPA approved rule 930 on May 6, 1980 (45 FR 29790). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 19498]] MDEQ revised rule 930 to clarify rule requirements and applicability. MDEQ removed the compliance date of December 31, 1982, and replaced it with a general compliance requirement because the compliance date has passed. MDEQ also removed language outlining the details of a compliance plan, instead requiring immediate compliance. MDEQ removed the applicability of rule 930 in Saginaw, Macomb and Oakland Counties where ferrous cupola operations no longer exist. Wayne County is the only remaining area subject to rule 930. Finally, MDEQ corrected the citation to the Federal test method used to determine CO emission rates for rule compliance. The change to rule 930 clarifies that 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, reference test method 10 must be used to determine CO emission rates for rule compliance, and clarifies that this test method is adopted by reference in rule 902. II. Did the State hold public hearings for the submittal? A public hearing on the Part 9 (specifically rule 930) rule revisions was held on May 2, 2016, and no comments were received. III. What is EPA's analysis of the State's Submittal? The removal of the compliance plan requirement from rule 930 and the replacement of the December 21, 1982, compliance date with a general compliance requirement is acceptable because the revised language requires immediate compliance. The removal of Saginaw, Macomb, and Oakland Counties from the list of areas subject to rule 930 is also acceptable because there are no ferrous cupola sources located in these counties. As part of MDEQ's reassessment of rule 930 in 2013, MDEQ conducted a search of the Michigan Air Emissions Reporting System and found that there are no ferrous cupola sources in the Saginaw, Macomb, Oakland, or Wayne Counties. Thus, MDEQ chose to revise the areas subject to rule 930 listed in table 91 by removing Saginaw, Macomb, and Oakland Counties. Last, the administrative changes to rule 930 that correct the citation to the Federal test method is acceptable because the revised language clarifies that 40 CFR part 60, appendix A, reference test method 10 must be used to determine CO emission rates for rule compliance and its adoption by reference in rule 902. EPA is taking action to approve the revisions to rule 902 in a separate rulemaking. Section 110(l) Analysis of the State's Submittal EPA is proposing to approve the revisions to rule 930 discussed above because the revisions meet all applicable requirements under the Clean Air Act (CAA), consistent with section 110(k)(3) of the CAA. Furthermore, MDEQ has shown that the revisions to Part 9 do not interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress or any other applicable CAA requirement, consistent with section 110(l) of the CAA. Under Section 110(l) of the CAA, EPA shall not approve a SIP revision if it would interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress (as defined in section 171 of the CAA) or any other applicable requirement of the CAA. The proposed SIP revision would not interfere with any applicable CAA requirements based on technical analysis submitted by MDEQ. MDEQ has shown that the impact of revising rule 930 continues to result in attainment of the CO NAAQS. Replacing the obsolete compliance date and compliance plan with a general compliance requirement results in requiring immediate compliance, which is not a relaxation to the SIP. Removing the applicability to areas of the state that no longer contain ferrous cupola sources will have no effect on any emissions and will not interfere with the attainment or maintenance of the CO NAAQS, or any other applicable requirements of the CAA, including the attainment or maintenance of the nitrogen dioxide, lead, particulate matter, or sulfur dioxide NAAQS. In addition, any new ferrous cupola operations subject to rule 930 that may be sited in Michigan would have to meet the EPA- approved New Source Review permitting requirements (R 336.1201 to R 336.1209), which would ensure that the CO NAAQS would not be exceeded in Saginaw, Macomb, or Oakland Counties, regardless of their exclusion from rule 930. IV. What action is EPA taking? EPA is proposing to approve the revision to Michigan's Part 9 Rule submitted by MDEQ on February 2, 2017, and supplemented on November 8, 2017, as a revision to the Michigan SIP. Specifically, we are proposing to approve the revision that updates the applicability of rule 930 to: (1) Remove an obsolete compliance date and requires immediate compliance, (2) remove the areas of the state that no longer contain ferrous cupola sources subject to the rule, and (3) correct the citation to a Federal test method to determine CO emission rates for rule compliance. The revision to this rule will not increase emissions of CO to the atmosphere because no CO emission limits are revised. Michigan's Part 9 rule also included revisions to rule 902 and rule 916. EPA is taking action to approve the revisions to rule 902 in a separate rulemaking. EPA will also address the revisions to rule 916 separately. V. Incorporation by Reference. In this rule, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA proposes to incorporate by reference Michigan Administrative Code R 336.1930 Emission of carbon monoxide from ferrous cupola operations, effective December 20, 2016. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents generally available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 5 Office (please contact the person identified in the ``For Further Information Contact'' section of this preamble for more information). VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews. Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under Executive Order 12866; Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); [[Page 19499]] Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Volatile organic compounds and Ozone. Dated: April 25, 2018. Edward H. Chu, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. [FR Doc. 2018-09414 Filed 5-2-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 86 / Thursday, May 3, 2018 / Proposed Rules 19497
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory Dated: April 18, 2018. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
action’’ subject to review by the Office Alexis Strauss, system). For additional submission
of Management and Budget under Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. methods, please contact the person
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, [FR Doc. 2018–09213 Filed 5–2–18; 8:45 am] identified in the FOR FURTHER
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, BILLING CODE 6560–50–P INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the
January 21, 2011); full EPA public comment policy,
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 information about CBI or multimedia
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION submissions, and general guidance on
action because SIP approvals are AGENCY making effective comments, please visit
exempted under Executive Order 12866; http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
• Does not impose an information 40 CFR Part 52 commenting-epa-dockets.
collection burden under the provisions
[EPA–R05–OAR–2017–0100; FRL–9977–53– FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 Region 5] Charles Hatten, Environmental
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air
Air Plan Approval; Michigan; Revisions Programs Branch (AR–18J),
significant economic impact on a to Part 9 Miscellaneous Rules
substantial number of small entities Environmental Protection Agency,
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 AGENCY: Environmental Protection Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Agency (EPA). Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–3031,
• Does not contain any unfunded ACTION: Proposed rule. hatten.charles@epa.gov.
mandate or significantly or uniquely SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
affect small governments, as described SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Throughout this document whenever
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); request submitted by the Michigan EPA. This supplementary information
• Does not have Federalism Department of Environmental Quality
section is arranged as follows:
implications as specified in Executive (MDEQ) on February 2, 2017, and
supplemented on November 8, 2017, to I. What are the State rule revisions?
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, II. Did the State hold public hearings for the
1999); revise the Michigan state
submittal?
• Is not an economically significant implementation plan (SIP) for carbon
III. What is EPA’s analysis of the State’s
regulatory action based on health or monoxide (CO). The revision submittal?
safety risks subject to Executive Order incorporates changes to Michigan’s Air IV. What action is EPA taking?
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Pollution Control Rules entitled V. Incorporation by Reference
• Is not a significant regulatory action ‘‘Emissions Limitations and VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR Prohibitions—Miscellaneous.’’ The
revision updates existing source-specific I. What are the State rule revisions?
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of rule requirements for ferrous cupola On February 2, 2017, MDEQ
Section 12(d) of the National operations by removing obsolete rule submitted a request to incorporate
Technology Transfer and Advancement language and makes a minor change to revisions to Michigan’s Air Pollution
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because correct the citation to a Federal test Control Rules in Chapter 336, Part 9—
application of those requirements would method. The revision continues to result Emissions Limitations and
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; in attainment of the CO national Prohibitions—Miscellaneous (Part 9) in
and ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). the Michigan SIP. Michigan’s submittal
• Does not provide the EPA with the DATES: Comments must be received on included revisions to three separate
discretionary authority to address or before June 4, 2018. rules in Part 9: R 336.1902—‘‘Adoption
disproportionate human health or ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, of standards by reference’’ (rule 902); R
environmental effects with practical, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– 336.1916—‘‘Affirmative defense for
appropriate, and legally permissible OAR–2017–0100 at http:// excess emissions during start-up or
methods under Executive Order 12898 www.regulations.gov or via email to shutdown’’ (rule 916); and R 336.1930—
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). blakley.pamela@epa.gov. For comments ‘‘Emission of carbon monoxide from
In addition, the SIP is not approved submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the ferrous cupola operations’’ (rule 930).
to apply on any Indian reservation land online instructions for submitting This rule will only take action on rule
or in any other area where the EPA or comments. Once submitted, comments 930, while the revisions to rule 902 and
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a cannot be edited or removed from 916 will be addressed separately.
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Regulations.gov. For either manner of Michigan’s rule 930 specifies CO
Indian country, the rule does not have submission, EPA may publish any emission limits for large ferrous cupola
tribal implications and will not impose comment received to its public docket. operations with a melting capacity of 20
substantial direct costs on tribal Do not submit electronically any tons or more per hour. The version of
governments or preempt tribal law as information you consider to be rule 930 currently approved into the
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 Confidential Business Information (CBI) Michigan SIP only applies to ferrous
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). or other information whose disclosure is cupola operations in Saginaw, Macomb,
restricted by statute. Multimedia Oakland, and Wayne Counties in
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be Michigan.1 The rule is designed to
Environmental protection, Air accompanied by a written comment. require installation of afterburner
pollution control, Incorporation by The written comment is considered the control system, or equivalent, which
reference Intergovernmental relations, official comment and should include reduces the CO emissions from the
Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting discussion of all points you wish to ferrous cupola by 90 percent.
and recordkeeping requirements, make. EPA will generally not consider
Volatile organic compounds. comments or comment contents located 1 EPA approved rule 930 on May 6, 1980 (45 FR
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. outside of the primary submission (i.e. 29790).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:35 May 02, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\03MYP1.SGM 03MYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_19583/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 86 / Thursday, May 3, 2018 / Proposed Rules 19499
• Does not contain any unfunded ACTION: Proposed rule. information about CBI or multimedia
mandate or significantly or uniquely submissions, and general guidance on
affect small governments, as described SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection making effective comments, please visit
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Agency (EPA) is proposing amendments https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); to the National Emission Standards for commenting-epa-dockets. The EPA may
• Does not have Federalism Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for publish any comment received to its
implications as specified in Executive the Friction Materials Manufacturing public docket. Multimedia submissions
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, Facilities source category. The proposed (audio, video, etc.) must be
1999); amendments address the results of the accompanied by a written comment.
• Is not an economically significant residual risk and technology reviews The written comment is considered the
regulatory action based on health or (RTRs) conducted as required under the official comment and should include
safety risks subject to Executive Order Clean Air Act (CAA). The proposed discussion of all points you wish to
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); amendments also address the startup, make. The EPA will generally not
• Is not a significant regulatory action shutdown, and malfunction (SSM) consider comments or comment
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR provisions of the rule and update the contents located outside of the primary
28355, May 22, 2001); reporting and recordkeeping submission (i.e., on the Web, cloud, or
• Is not subject to requirements of requirements. other file sharing system). For
Section 12(d) of the National additional submission methods, the full
DATES: Comments. Comments must be
Technology Transfer and Advancement EPA public comment policy,
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because received on or before June 18, 2018.
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act information about CBI or multimedia
application of those requirements would submissions, and general guidance on
be inconsistent with the CAA; and (PRA), comments on the information
collection provisions are best assured of making effective comments, please visit
• Does not provide EPA with the https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
discretionary authority to address, as consideration if the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) commenting-epa-dockets.
appropriate, disproportionate human Public Hearing. If a public hearing is
health or environmental effects, using receives a copy of your comments on or
before June 4, 2018. requested, it will be held at EPA’s
practicable and legally permissible Headquarters, EPA WJC East Building,
methods, under Executive Order 12898 Public Hearing. If a public hearing is
requested by May 8, 2018, then we will 1201 Constitution Avenue NW,
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). Washington, DC 20004. If a public
In addition, the SIP is not approved hold a public hearing on May 18, 2018
at the location described in the hearing is requested, then we will
to apply on any Indian reservation land provide details about the public hearing
or in any other area where EPA or an ADDRESSES section. The last day to pre-
register in advance to speak at the on our website at: https://www.epa.gov/
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a stationary-sources-air-pollution/friction-
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of public hearing will be May 16, 2018.
materials-manufacturing-facilities-
Indian country, the rule does not have ADDRESSES: Comments. Submit your national-emission. The EPA does not
tribal implications and will not impose comments, identified by Docket ID No. intend to publish another document in
substantial direct costs on tribal EPA–HQ–OAR–2017–0358, at http:// the Federal Register announcing any
governments or preempt tribal law as www.regulations.gov. Follow the online updates on the request for a public
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 instructions for submitting comments. hearing. Please contact Aimee St. Clair
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). Once submitted, comments cannot be at (919) 541–1063 or by email at
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 edited or removed from Regulations.gov. StClair.Aimee@epa.gov to request a
Regulations.gov is our preferred method public hearing, to register to speak at the
Environmental protection, Air of receiving comments. However, other public hearing, or to inquire as to
pollution control, Carbon monoxide, submission methods are accepted. To whether a public hearing will be held.
Incorporation by reference, ship or send mail via the United States The EPA will make every effort to
Intergovernmental relations, Volatile Postal Service, use the following accommodate all speakers who arrive
organic compounds and Ozone. address: U.S. Environmental Protection and register. If a hearing is held at a U.S.
Dated: April 25, 2018. Agency, EPA Docket Center, Docket ID government facility, individuals
Edward H. Chu, No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2017–0358, Mail planning to attend should be prepared
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania to show a current, valid state- or federal-
[FR Doc. 2018–09414 Filed 5–2–18; 8:45 am] Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460. approved picture identification to the
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Use the following Docket Center address security staff in order to gain access to
if you are using express mail, the meeting room. An expired form of
commercial delivery, hand delivery, or identification will not be permitted.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION courier: EPA Docket Center, EPA WJC Please note that the Real ID Act, passed
AGENCY West Building, Room 3334, 1301 by Congress in 2005, established new
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, requirements for entering federal
40 CFR Part 63 DC 20004. Delivery verification facilities. If your driver’s license is
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2017–0358; FRL–9977–29– signatures will be available only during issued by a noncompliant state, you
OAR] regular business hours. must present an additional form of
Do not submit electronically any identification to enter a federal facility.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
RIN 2060–AT66 information you consider to be Acceptable alternative forms of
Confidential Business Information (CBI) identification include: Federal
National Emission Standards for
or other information whose disclosure is employee badge, passports, enhanced
Hazardous Air Pollutants for Friction
restricted by statute. See section I.C of driver’s licenses, and military
Materials Manufacturing Facilities;
this preamble for instructions on identification cards. Additional
Residual Risk and Technology Review
submitting CBI. information on the Real ID Act is
AGENCY: Environmental Protection For additional submission methods, available at https://www.dhs.gov/real-
Agency (EPA). the full EPA public comment policy, id-frequently-asked-questions. In
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:35 May 02, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\03MYP1.SGM 03MYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_19583/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-05-02 23:48:27
Document Modified: 2018-05-02 23:48:27
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Comments must be received on or before June 4, 2018. | |
| Contact | Charles Hatten, Environmental Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-3031, [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 19497 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Carbon Monoxide; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations and Volatile Organic Compounds and Ozone |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR