83_FR_19891 83 FR 19804 - Notice of Availability of the Oregon Draft Resource Management Plan Amendment and Environmental Impact Statement for Greater Sage-Grouse Conservation

83 FR 19804 - Notice of Availability of the Oregon Draft Resource Management Plan Amendment and Environmental Impact Statement for Greater Sage-Grouse Conservation

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 87 (May 4, 2018)

Page Range19804-19805
FR Document2018-09525

In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended, and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, as amended (FLPMA), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has prepared the Oregon Draft Resource Management Plan (RMP) Amendment and Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for Greater Sage-Grouse (GRSG) Conservation for the Oregon Greater Sage-Grouse Sub-Region and by this notice is announcing the opening of the comment period. BLM Oregon is soliciting comments on the entire Draft EIS, as well as the specific planning issues mentioned in this NOA, and the cumulative effects analysis.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 87 (Friday, May 4, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 87 (Friday, May 4, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19804-19805]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-09525]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLWO200000.LXSGPL000000.18x.L11100000.PH0000]


Notice of Availability of the Oregon Draft Resource Management 
Plan Amendment and Environmental Impact Statement for Greater Sage-
Grouse Conservation

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 
1969, as amended, and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 
1976, as amended (FLPMA), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has 
prepared the Oregon Draft Resource Management Plan (RMP) Amendment and 
Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for Greater Sage-Grouse 
(GRSG) Conservation for the Oregon Greater Sage-Grouse Sub-Region and 
by this notice is announcing the opening of the comment period. BLM 
Oregon is soliciting comments on the entire Draft EIS, as well as the 
specific planning issues mentioned in this NOA, and the cumulative 
effects analysis.

DATES: To ensure that comments will be considered, the BLM must receive 
written comments on the Draft RMP Amendment/Draft EIS within 90 days 
following the date the Environmental Protection Agency publishes a 
notice of availability of the Draft RMP Amendment/Draft EIS in the 
Federal Register. The BLM will announce future meetings or hearings and 
any other public participation activities at least 15 days in advance 
through public notices, media releases, and/or mailings.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments related to the Oregon Greater Sage-
Grouse Draft RMP Amendment/Draft EIS by any of the following methods:
     Website: https://goo.gl/PxkL5Q.
     Mail: BLM Oregon State Office, Attn: Draft EIS for Greater 
Sage-Grouse Conservation, P.O. Box 2969, Portland, OR 97208.
    Copies of the Oregon Draft RMP Amendment/Draft EIS are available at 
https://goo.gl/PxkL5Q.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information contact Jim 
Regan-Vienop, Planning and Environmental Coordinator, telephone 503-
808-6062; address 1220 SW 3rd Ave., Suite 1305, Portland, OR 97204; 
email [email protected]. Persons who use a telecommunications device 
for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Relay

[[Page 19805]]

Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact Mr. Regan-Vienop. The FRS is 
available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question 
with Mr. Regan-Vienop. You will receive a reply during normal business 
hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Greater Sage-Grouse is a state-managed 
species that is dependent on sagebrush steppe ecosystems. These 
ecosystems are managed in partnership across the range of the Greater 
Sage-Grouse by federal, state, and local authorities. Efforts to 
conserve the species and its habitat date back to the 1950s. Over the 
past two decades, state wildlife agencies, federal agencies, and many 
others in the range of the species have been collaborating to conserve 
Greater Sage-Grouse and its habitats. The United States Department of 
the Interior (DOI) and the BLM have broad responsibilities to manage 
federal lands and resources for the public benefit. Nearly half of 
Greater Sage-Grouse habitat is managed by the BLM. The BLM is committed 
to being a good neighbor and investing in on-the-ground conservation 
activities through close collaboration with State governments, local 
communities, private landowners, and other stakeholders.
    In September 2015, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 
determined that the Greater Sage-Grouse did not warrant listing under 
the Endangered Species Act of 1973. The USFWS based its ``not 
warranted'' determination, in part, on the conservation commitments and 
management actions in the BLM and U.S. Forest Service (Forest Service) 
Greater Sage-Grouse land use plan amendments and revisions (2015 GRSG 
land use plan decisions), as well as on other private, state, and 
federal conservation efforts. Since 2015 the BLM, in discussion with 
partners, primarily Governors and state wildlife management agencies, 
recognized that several refinements and policy updates could help 
strengthen conservation efforts, while providing increased economic 
opportunity to local communities. The BLM and Department of Interior 
worked closely with Governors charged with managing Greater Sage-Grouse 
to determine whether some, none, or all of the 2015 Land Use Plans 
should be amended. After carefully considering the Governor's input, 
and using its discretion and authority under FLPMA, as well as under 
direction from the Secretary, including Secretary's Order (SO) 3353, 
the BLM proposes amending the Oregon Greater Sage-Grouse land use plans 
that address GRSG management. This action is proposed to enhance 
cooperation and improve alignment with the state plans or management 
strategies, in accordance with the BLM's multiple use and sustained 
yield mission. The BLM prepared the Oregon Greater Sage-Grouse Draft 
RMP Amendment/Draft EIS to address alternatives that will build upon 
its commitment to conserve and restore Greater Sage-Grouse habitat, 
while improving collaboration and alignment with state management 
strategies for Greater Sage-Grouse. The BLM seeks to improve management 
alignment in ways that will increase management flexibility, maintain 
access to public resources, and promote conservation outcomes. The BLM 
used internal, agency, and public scoping to identify issues considered 
in the environmental analysis. As part of this analysis, the BLM also 
examined the range of alternatives evaluated in the BLM's 2015 GRSG 
land use plan decisions and their supporting NEPA analyses.
    This Draft RMP Amendment/Draft EIS is one of six separate planning 
efforts that are being undertaken in response to SO 3353, Greater Sage-
Grouse Conservation and Cooperation with Western States (June 7, 2017), 
and in accordance with SO 3349, American Energy Independence (March 29, 
2017). The Draft RMP Amendment/Draft EIS proposes to amend the RMPs for 
field offices on BLM lands within BLM Oregon boundaries. The current 
management decisions for resources are described in the following RMPs:

 Andrews (2005)
 Baker (1989)
 Brothers/La Pine (1989)
 Lakeview (2003)
 Southeastern Oregon (2002)
 Steens (2005)
 Three Rivers (1992)
 Upper Deschutes (2005)
    The planning area includes approximately 60,649 acres of BLM-
administered lands located in Oregon, in three counties: Harney, Lake, 
and Malheur. Within the decision area, the BLM administers 
approximately 21,959 acres of public lands, providing approximately 
21,959 acres of GRSG habitat. Surface management decisions made as a 
result of this Draft RMP Amendment/Draft EIS will apply only to BLM-
administered lands in the decision area.
    The formal public scoping process for the RMP Amendment/EIS began 
on October 11, 2017, with the publication of a Notice of Intent in the 
Federal Register (82 FR 47248), and ended on December 1, 2017. The BLM 
in Oregon held one public scoping meeting in Burns, Oregon on November 
7, 2017.
    The Oregon RMP Amendment/EIS addresses the availability or 
unavailability of livestock grazing in 13 key Research Natural Areas 
(RNAs). RNAs are a subset type of Areas of Critical Environmental 
Concern. The Oregon Draft RMP Amendment/Draft EIS focuses on the issue 
of availability of livestock grazing within key RNAs. The Draft RMP 
Amendment/Draft EIS evaluates two alternatives in detail, including the 
No Action Alternative (Alternative A) and one action alternative 
(Alternative B). Alternative B has been identified as BLM's Preferred 
Alternative for the purposes of public comment and review. 
Identification of this alternative, however, does not represent final 
agency direction, and the Proposed RMP Amendment/Final EIS may reflect 
changes or adjustments from information received during public comment, 
from new information, or from changes in BLM policies or priorities. 
The Proposed RMP Amendment/Final EIS may include objectives and actions 
described in the other analyzed alternative as well.
    Alternative A would retain the current management goals, 
objectives, and direction specified in the current RMPs, as amended, 
for each field office.
    Please note that public comments and information submitted 
including names, street addresses, and email addresses of persons who 
submit comments will be available for public review and disclosure at 
the address provided in the ADDRESSES section of this notice during 
regular business hours (8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.), Monday through Friday, 
except holidays.
    Before including your address, phone number, email address, or 
other personal identifying information in your comments, please be 
aware that your entire comment, including your personal identifying 
information, may be made publicly available at any time. While you can 
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying 
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be 
able to do so.

    Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10, 43 CFR 1610.2

Jamie E. Connell,
Oregon/Washington State Director.
[FR Doc. 2018-09525 Filed 5-3-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4310-84-P



                                             19804                             Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 87 / Friday, May 4, 2018 / Notices

                                             • Park City Management Framework                        adjustment of habitat boundaries to                   DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
                                               Plan (1975)                                           reflect new information, grazing systems
                                             • Pinyon Management Framework Plan                      and prioritization of grazing permits,                Bureau of Land Management
                                               (1978)                                                water developments management in                      [LLWO200000.LXSGPL000000.18x.L111000
                                             • Pony Express Resource Management                      relation to water rights, travel and                  00.PH0000]
                                               Plan (1990)                                           transportation management planning,
                                             • Price Resource Management Plan                        and surface coal mining.                              Notice of Availability of the Oregon
                                               (2008)                                                                                                      Draft Resource Management Plan
                                             • Randolph Management Framework                            The Draft RMP Amendment/Draft EIS
                                                                                                                                                           Amendment and Environmental Impact
                                               Plan (1980)                                           evaluates two alternatives in detail,
                                                                                                                                                           Statement for Greater Sage-Grouse
                                             • Richfield Resource Management Plan                    including the No Action Alternative                   Conservation
                                               (2008)                                                (Alternative A) and one action
                                             • Salt Lake District Isolated Tracts                    alternative (Management Alignment                     AGENCY:   Bureau of Land Management,
                                               Planning Analysis (1985)                              Alternative). The Management                          Interior.
                                             • Vernal Resource Management Plan                       Alignment Alternative has been                        ACTION: Notice of availability.
                                               (2008)                                                identified as BLM’s Preferred
                                             • Warm Springs Resource Management                      Alternative for the purposes of public                SUMMARY:   In accordance with the
                                               Plan (1987)                                           comment and review. Identification of                 National Environmental Policy Act of
                                               The planning area includes                                                                                  1969, as amended, and the Federal Land
                                                                                                     this alternative, however, does not
                                             approximately 48,158,700 acres of BLM,                                                                        Policy and Management Act of 1976, as
                                                                                                     represent final agency direction, and the
                                             National Park Service, U.S. Forest                                                                            amended (FLPMA), the Bureau of Land
                                             Service, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation,                    Proposed RMP Amendment/Final EIS
                                                                                                                                                           Management (BLM) has prepared the
                                             State, local, and private lands located in              may reflect changes or adjustments from
                                                                                                                                                           Oregon Draft Resource Management
                                             Utah, in 27 counties: Beaver, Box Elder,                information received during public
                                                                                                                                                           Plan (RMP) Amendment and Draft
                                             Cache, Carbon, Daggett, Davis,                          comment, from new information, or                     Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
                                             Duchesne, Emery, Garfield, Grand, Iron,                 from changes in BLM policies or                       for Greater Sage-Grouse (GRSG)
                                             Juab, Kane, Millard, Morgan, Piute,                     priorities. The Proposed RMP                          Conservation for the Oregon Greater
                                             Rich, Salt Lake, Sanpete, Sevier,                       Amendment/Final EIS may include                       Sage-Grouse Sub-Region and by this
                                             Summit, Tooele, Uintah, Utah, Wasatch,                  objectives and actions described in the               notice is announcing the opening of the
                                             Wayne, and Weber. Within the decision                   other analyzed alternative as well.                   comment period. BLM Oregon is
                                             area, the BLM administers                               Alternative A would retain the current                soliciting comments on the entire Draft
                                             approximately 4,017,400 acres of public                 management goals, objectives, and                     EIS, as well as the specific planning
                                             lands as GRSG habitat management                        direction specified in the current RMPs               issues mentioned in this NOA, and the
                                             areas. Surface management decisions                     for each field office.                                cumulative effects analysis.
                                             made as a result of this Draft RMP                         BLM Utah is soliciting comments on                 DATES: To ensure that comments will be
                                             Amendment/Draft EIS will apply only                     the entire Draft EIS, as well as the                  considered, the BLM must receive
                                             to BLM-administered lands in the                        specific planning issues mentioned in                 written comments on the Draft RMP
                                             decision area.                                          this NOA, and the cumulative effects                  Amendment/Draft EIS within 90 days
                                               The formal public scoping process for                                                                       following the date the Environmental
                                                                                                     analysis. Please note that public
                                             the RMP Amendment/EIS began on                                                                                Protection Agency publishes a notice of
                                                                                                     comments and information submitted
                                             October 11, 2017, with the publication                                                                        availability of the Draft RMP
                                                                                                     including names, street addresses, and
                                             of a Notice of Intent in the Federal                                                                          Amendment/Draft EIS in the Federal
                                             Register (82 FR 47248), and ended on                    email addresses of persons who submit
                                                                                                     comments will be available for public                 Register. The BLM will announce future
                                             December 1, 2017. The following public                                                                        meetings or hearings and any other
                                             meetings were held in Utah:                             review and disclosure at the address
                                                                                                     provided in the ADDRESSES section of                  public participation activities at least 15
                                             • Vernal, Utah; November 14, 2017
                                                                                                                                                           days in advance through public notices,
                                             • Cedar City, Utah; November 15, 2017                   this notice during regular business
                                             • Snowville, Utah; November 16, 2017                    hours (8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.), Monday                media releases, and/or mailings.
                                               The Draft RMP Amendment/Draft EIS                     through Friday, except holidays.                      ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
                                             addresses the designation of sagebrush                                                                        related to the Oregon Greater Sage-
                                                                                                        Before including your address, phone
                                             focal areas; disturbance and density                                                                          Grouse Draft RMP Amendment/Draft
                                                                                                     number, email address, or other
                                             caps; modification of habitat objectives;                                                                     EIS by any of the following methods:
                                                                                                     personal identifying information in your
                                             changes to waivers, exceptions and                                                                               • Website: https://goo.gl/PxkL5Q.
                                                                                                     comment, you should be aware that                        • Mail: BLM Oregon State Office,
                                             modification criteria; the need for                     your entire comment—including your
                                             General Habitat Management Areas;                                                                             Attn: Draft EIS for Greater Sage-Grouse
                                                                                                     personal identifying information—may                  Conservation, P.O. Box 2969, Portland,
                                             exceptions to greater sage-grouse
                                                                                                     be made publicly available at any time.               OR 97208.
                                             management within non-habitat
                                                                                                     While you can ask us in your comment                     Copies of the Oregon Draft RMP
                                             portions of Priority Habitat Management
                                                                                                     to withhold your personal identifying                 Amendment/Draft EIS are available at
                                             Areas; lek buffers; reversing adaptive
                                                                                                     information from public review, we                    https://goo.gl/PxkL5Q.
                                             management responses when the BLM
                                             determines that resource conditions no                  cannot guarantee that we will be able to              FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
                                             longer warrant those responses;                         do so.                                                further information contact Jim Regan-
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES




                                             prioritization of mineral leasing; land                   Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10,           Vienop, Planning and Environmental
                                             disposals and exchanges; predation;                     43 CFR 1610.2                                         Coordinator, telephone 503–808–6062;
                                             burial of transmission lines; direction to                                                                    address 1220 SW 3rd Ave., Suite 1305,
                                                                                                     Edwin L. Roberson,
                                             consider specific alternatives during                                                                         Portland, OR 97204; email
                                             implementation planning; and                            BLM Utah State Director.                              jreganvienop@blm.gov. Persons who use
                                             clarification of existing management                    [FR Doc. 2018–09526 Filed 5–3–18; 8:45 am]            a telecommunications device for the
                                             related to mitigation standards,                        BILLING CODE 4310–84–P                                deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Relay


                                        VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:16 May 03, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00125   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\04MYN1.SGM   04MYN1


                                                                               Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 87 / Friday, May 4, 2018 / Notices                                                  19805

                                             Service (FRS) at 1–800–877–8339 to                      enhance cooperation and improve                       held one public scoping meeting in
                                             contact Mr. Regan-Vienop. The FRS is                    alignment with the state plans or                     Burns, Oregon on November 7, 2017.
                                             available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week,                management strategies, in accordance                     The Oregon RMP Amendment/EIS
                                             to leave a message or question with Mr.                 with the BLM’s multiple use and
                                                                                                                                                           addresses the availability or
                                             Regan-Vienop. You will receive a reply                  sustained yield mission. The BLM
                                                                                                                                                           unavailability of livestock grazing in 13
                                             during normal business hours.                           prepared the Oregon Greater Sage-
                                                                                                     Grouse Draft RMP Amendment/Draft                      key Research Natural Areas (RNAs).
                                             SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Greater
                                                                                                     EIS to address alternatives that will                 RNAs are a subset type of Areas of
                                             Sage-Grouse is a state-managed species
                                                                                                     build upon its commitment to conserve                 Critical Environmental Concern. The
                                             that is dependent on sagebrush steppe
                                                                                                     and restore Greater Sage-Grouse habitat,              Oregon Draft RMP Amendment/Draft
                                             ecosystems. These ecosystems are
                                             managed in partnership across the range                 while improving collaboration and                     EIS focuses on the issue of availability
                                             of the Greater Sage-Grouse by federal,                  alignment with state management                       of livestock grazing within key RNAs.
                                             state, and local authorities. Efforts to                strategies for Greater Sage-Grouse. The               The Draft RMP Amendment/Draft EIS
                                             conserve the species and its habitat date               BLM seeks to improve management                       evaluates two alternatives in detail,
                                             back to the 1950s. Over the past two                    alignment in ways that will increase                  including the No Action Alternative
                                             decades, state wildlife agencies, federal               management flexibility, maintain access               (Alternative A) and one action
                                             agencies, and many others in the range                  to public resources, and promote                      alternative (Alternative B). Alternative B
                                             of the species have been collaborating to               conservation outcomes. The BLM used                   has been identified as BLM’s Preferred
                                             conserve Greater Sage-Grouse and its                    internal, agency, and public scoping to               Alternative for the purposes of public
                                             habitats. The United States Department                  identify issues considered in the                     comment and review. Identification of
                                             of the Interior (DOI) and the BLM have                  environmental analysis. As part of this               this alternative, however, does not
                                             broad responsibilities to manage federal                analysis, the BLM also examined the                   represent final agency direction, and the
                                             lands and resources for the public                      range of alternatives evaluated in the                Proposed RMP Amendment/Final EIS
                                             benefit. Nearly half of Greater Sage-                   BLM’s 2015 GRSG land use plan                         may reflect changes or adjustments from
                                             Grouse habitat is managed by the BLM.                   decisions and their supporting NEPA                   information received during public
                                             The BLM is committed to being a good                    analyses.                                             comment, from new information, or
                                             neighbor and investing in on-the-ground                    This Draft RMP Amendment/Draft EIS                 from changes in BLM policies or
                                             conservation activities through close                   is one of six separate planning efforts
                                                                                                                                                           priorities. The Proposed RMP
                                             collaboration with State governments,                   that are being undertaken in response to
                                                                                                                                                           Amendment/Final EIS may include
                                             local communities, private landowners,                  SO 3353, Greater Sage-Grouse
                                                                                                                                                           objectives and actions described in the
                                             and other stakeholders.                                 Conservation and Cooperation with
                                                In September 2015, the U.S. Fish and                 Western States (June 7, 2017), and in                 other analyzed alternative as well.
                                             Wildlife Service (USFWS) determined                     accordance with SO 3349, American                       Alternative A would retain the
                                             that the Greater Sage-Grouse did not                    Energy Independence (March 29, 2017).                 current management goals, objectives,
                                             warrant listing under the Endangered                    The Draft RMP Amendment/Draft EIS                     and direction specified in the current
                                             Species Act of 1973. The USFWS based                    proposes to amend the RMPs for field                  RMPs, as amended, for each field office.
                                             its ‘‘not warranted’’ determination, in                 offices on BLM lands within BLM
                                                                                                                                                              Please note that public comments and
                                             part, on the conservation commitments                   Oregon boundaries. The current
                                                                                                                                                           information submitted including names,
                                             and management actions in the BLM                       management decisions for resources are
                                                                                                                                                           street addresses, and email addresses of
                                             and U.S. Forest Service (Forest Service)                described in the following RMPs:
                                                                                                                                                           persons who submit comments will be
                                             Greater Sage-Grouse land use plan                       • Andrews (2005)                                      available for public review and
                                             amendments and revisions (2015 GRSG                     • Baker (1989)
                                                                                                                                                           disclosure at the address provided in
                                             land use plan decisions), as well as on                 • Brothers/La Pine (1989)
                                             other private, state, and federal                       • Lakeview (2003)                                     the ADDRESSES section of this notice
                                             conservation efforts. Since 2015 the                    • Southeastern Oregon (2002)                          during regular business hours (8:00 a.m.
                                             BLM, in discussion with partners,                       • Steens (2005)                                       to 4:00 p.m.), Monday through Friday,
                                             primarily Governors and state wildlife                  • Three Rivers (1992)                                 except holidays.
                                             management agencies, recognized that                    • Upper Deschutes (2005)                                Before including your address, phone
                                             several refinements and policy updates                     The planning area includes                         number, email address, or other
                                             could help strengthen conservation                      approximately 60,649 acres of BLM-                    personal identifying information in your
                                             efforts, while providing increased                      administered lands located in Oregon,                 comments, please be aware that your
                                             economic opportunity to local                           in three counties: Harney, Lake, and                  entire comment, including your
                                             communities. The BLM and Department                     Malheur. Within the decision area, the                personal identifying information, may
                                             of Interior worked closely with                         BLM administers approximately 21,959                  be made publicly available at any time.
                                             Governors charged with managing                         acres of public lands, providing
                                                                                                                                                           While you can ask us in your comment
                                             Greater Sage-Grouse to determine                        approximately 21,959 acres of GRSG
                                                                                                                                                           to withhold your personal identifying
                                             whether some, none, or all of the 2015                  habitat. Surface management decisions
                                                                                                                                                           information from public review, we
                                             Land Use Plans should be amended.                       made as a result of this Draft RMP
                                                                                                                                                           cannot guarantee that we will be able to
                                             After carefully considering the                         Amendment/Draft EIS will apply only
                                             Governor’s input, and using its                         to BLM-administered lands in the                      do so.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES




                                             discretion and authority under FLPMA,                   decision area.                                          Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10,
                                             as well as under direction from the                        The formal public scoping process for              43 CFR 1610.2
                                             Secretary, including Secretary’s Order                  the RMP Amendment/EIS began on
                                                                                                                                                           Jamie E. Connell,
                                             (SO) 3353, the BLM proposes amending                    October 11, 2017, with the publication
                                             the Oregon Greater Sage-Grouse land                     of a Notice of Intent in the Federal                  Oregon/Washington State Director.
                                             use plans that address GRSG                             Register (82 FR 47248), and ended on                  [FR Doc. 2018–09525 Filed 5–3–18; 8:45 am]
                                             management. This action is proposed to                  December 1, 2017. The BLM in Oregon                   BILLING CODE 4310–84–P




                                        VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:16 May 03, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00126   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\04MYN1.SGM   04MYN1



Document Created: 2018-11-02 09:52:25
Document Modified: 2018-11-02 09:52:25
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice of availability.
DatesTo ensure that comments will be considered, the BLM must receive written comments on the Draft RMP Amendment/Draft EIS within 90 days following the date the Environmental Protection Agency publishes a notice of availability of the Draft RMP Amendment/Draft EIS in the Federal Register. The BLM will announce future meetings or hearings and any other public participation activities at least 15 days in advance through public notices, media releases, and/or mailings.
ContactFor further information contact Jim Regan-Vienop, Planning and Environmental Coordinator, telephone 503-
FR Citation83 FR 19804 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR