83 FR 2060 - Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Isthmus Slough, Coos Bay, OR

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 10 (January 16, 2018)

Page Range		2060-2062
FR Document		2018-00611

The Coast Guard is temporarily modifying the operating schedule that governs the Oregon State secondary highway bridge (Isthmus Slough Bridge), across Isthmus Slough, mile 1.0, at Coos Bay, OR. To accommodate Oregon Department of Transportation's (ODOT) preservation, painting and replacement of the bridge equipment, ODOT will operate half the double bascule span (single leaf). Additionally, during the period of this work, the non-functioning leaf of the span's vertical clearance will be reduced.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 10 (Tuesday, January 16, 2018)

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 16, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2060-2062]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00611]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2017-0868]
RIN 1625-AA09


Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Isthmus Slough, Coos Bay, OR

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is temporarily modifying the operating 
schedule that governs the Oregon State secondary highway bridge 
(Isthmus Slough Bridge), across Isthmus Slough, mile 1.0, at Coos Bay, 
OR. To accommodate Oregon Department of Transportation's (ODOT) 
preservation, painting and replacement of the bridge equipment, ODOT 
will operate half the double bascule span (single leaf). Additionally, 
during the period of this work, the non-functioning leaf of the span's 
vertical clearance will be reduced.

DATES: This temporary final rule is effective from 6 a.m. on February 
26, 2018 to 6 p.m. on July 31, 2019.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov. Type USCG-
2017-0868 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email Steven M. Fischer, Bridge Administrator, Thirteenth Coast 
Guard District Bridge Program Office, telephone 206-220-7282; email 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
ODOT Oregon Department of Transportation
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose and Legal Basis

    On October 24, 2017, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking 
(NPRM) entitled Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Isthmus Slough, Coos 
Bay, OR, in the Federal Register (82 FR 49153). We received no comments 
on this rule. ODOT owns and operates the double bascule Isthmus Slough 
Bridge, across Isthmus Slough, mile 1.0, at Coos Bay, OR. The operating 
regulation has been temporarily modified to accommodate ODOT's 
painting, preservation, and upgrading of the bridge electrical systems. 
Isthmus Slough provides no alternate routes to pass around the Isthmus 
Slough Bridge. To facilitate this event, ODOT will operate the double 
bascule bridge in single leaf mode (half of the span), and reduce the 
vertical clearance of the non-functioning leaf. Up to ten feet of 
containment will be installed under the non-functioning leaf only, and 
will reduce the vertical clearance to 18 feet. Vessels that do not 
require an opening may transit under the bridge at any time. We 
approved a temporary deviation on August 4, 2017 (82 FR 36332), with 
the same change in bridge operations as this rule change. We have not 
received any reports of problems or complaints with the subject bridge 
operating under the temporary deviation.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority 33 U.S.C. 499. 
Isthmus Slough Bridge, across Isthmus Slough, mile 1.0, at Coos Bay, 
OR, is a double bascule drawbridge, and provides a vertical clearance 
of 28 feet in the closed-to-navigation position referenced to the 
vertical clearance above mean high water tide level. ODOT cannot 
complete scheduled maintenance and equipment upgrades unless the 
operating schedule for the subject bridge is changed.

[[Page 2061]]

    We approved a temporary deviation for this event, but later learned 
180 days will not be enough time to complete the work. This temporary 
rule change to 33 CFR 117.879 will allow ODOT time to complete their 
scheduled maintenance and equipment upgrades. This temporary rule 
suspends the current paragraph regarding the Isthmus Slough Bridge, and 
adds a temporary new paragraph which amends the operating schedule of 
the Isthmus Slough Bridge by authorizing one half of the draw to open 
on signal, and reduces the horizontal clearance and vertical clearance 
of the bridge. The temporary rule is necessary to accommodate painting, 
preservation, and upgrading of its electrical systems. One half of the 
double bascule bridge will have a containment system installed on the 
non-functioning half of the span, and therefore reduces the vertical 
clearance by ten feet to 18 feet. The horizontal clearance with a full 
opening is 140 feet. In single leaf operation, the horizontal clearance 
is reduced to approximately 70 feet.

IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes and the Temporary Final Rule

    We published a NPRM in October 2017 with a 30 day comment period, 
and did not receive any comments. We approved this temporary rule 
change to 33 CFR 117.879 to be in effect from 6 a.m. on February 26, 
2018, through 6 p.m. on July 31, 2019. This temporary rule authorizes 
ODOT to operate the Isthmus Slough Bridge one half of the draw on 
signal if at least 24 hours notice is given to the bridge operator, and 
reduce the horizontal clearance and vertical clearance of the bridge.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and Executive Orders, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protesters.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control 
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been 
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 
12866. Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt 
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771. This regulatory action 
determination is based on the ability for mariners to transit under the 
bridge because the Isthmus Slough Bridge can open half the draw 
allowing for the reasonable needs of navigation.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business 
Administration on this rule. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 
605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities. While some owners or operators of 
vessels intending to transit the bridge may be small entities, for the 
reasons stated in section VI.A above, this rule would not have a 
significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction, and you 
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT, above.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Government

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. We 
received no (0) comments in the NPRM for this section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble. We received no (0) comments in the NPRM for this 
section.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a 
determination that this action is one of a category of actions which do 
not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human 
environment. This rule simply promulgates the operating regulations or 
procedures for drawbridges. This action is categorically excluded from 
further review, under figure 2-1, paragraph (32) (e), of the 
Instruction. A Record of Environmental

[[Page 2062]]

Consideration and a Memorandum for the Record are not required for this 
rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the ``For Further 
Information Contact'' section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117

    Bridges.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 117 as follows:

PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; and Department of 
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.


Sec.  117.879   [Suspended]

0
2. Suspend Sec.  117.879 effective 6 a.m. on February 26, 2018, through 
6 p.m. on July 31, 2019.

0
3. Add temporary Sec.  117.T879, effective 6 a.m. on February 26, 2018, 
through 6 p.m. on July 31, 2019, to read as follows:


Sec.  117.T879  Isthmus Slough.

    The draw of the Oregon State secondary highway bridge, mile 1.0, at 
Coos Bay, shall operate in single leaf, and open half the draw on 
signal if at least 24 hours notice is given. The vertical clearance of 
the non-functioning leaf will be reduced up to ten feet.

David G. Throop,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Thirteenth Coast Guard 
District.
[FR Doc. 2018-00611 Filed 1-12-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 16, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 2061

We approved a temporary deviation pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
for this event, but later learned 180 days from the requirements of Executive 3520).
will not be enough time to complete the Order 13771. This regulatory action
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
work. This temporary rule change to 33 determination is based on the ability for
Government
CFR 117.879 will allow ODOT time to mariners to transit under the bridge
complete their scheduled maintenance because the Isthmus Slough Bridge can A rule has implications for federalism
and equipment upgrades. This open half the draw allowing for the under Executive Order 13132,
temporary rule suspends the current reasonable needs of navigation. Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
paragraph regarding the Isthmus Slough effect on the States, on the relationship
Bridge, and adds a temporary new B. Impact on Small Entities between the national government and
paragraph which amends the operating The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 the States, or on the distribution of
schedule of the Isthmus Slough Bridge (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, power and responsibilities among the
by authorizing one half of the draw to requires federal agencies to consider the various levels of government. We have
open on signal, and reduces the potential impact of regulations on small analyzed this rule under that Order and
horizontal clearance and vertical entities during rulemaking. The term have determined that it is consistent
clearance of the bridge. The temporary ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small with the fundamental federalism
rule is necessary to accommodate businesses, not-for-profit organizations principles and preemption requirements
painting, preservation, and upgrading of that are independently owned and described in Executive Order 13132.
its electrical systems. One half of the operated and are not dominant in their Also, this rule does not have tribal
double bascule bridge will have a fields, and governmental jurisdictions implications under Executive Order
containment system installed on the with populations of less than 50,000. 13175, Consultation and Coordination
non-functioning half of the span, and The Coast Guard received no comments with Indian Tribal Governments,
therefore reduces the vertical clearance from the Small Business Administration because it does not have a substantial
by ten feet to 18 feet. The horizontal on this rule. The Coast Guard certifies direct effect on one or more Indian
clearance with a full opening is 140 feet. under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will tribes, on the relationship between the
In single leaf operation, the horizontal not have a significant economic impact Federal Government and Indian tribes,
clearance is reduced to approximately on a substantial number of small or on the distribution of power and
70 feet. entities. While some owners or responsibilities between the Federal
operators of vessels intending to transit Government and Indian tribes. We
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes received no (0) comments in the NPRM
and the Temporary Final Rule the bridge may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section VI.A above, for this section.
We published a NPRM in October this rule would not have a significant E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
2017 with a 30 day comment period, economic impact on any vessel owner
and did not receive any comments. We The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
or operator. of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
approved this temporary rule change to
Under section 213(a) of the Small Federal agencies to assess the effects of
33 CFR 117.879 to be in effect from 6
Business Regulatory Enforcement their discretionary regulatory actions. In
a.m. on February 26, 2018, through 6
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104– particular, the Act addresses actions
p.m. on July 31, 2019. This temporary
121), we want to assist small entities in that may result in the expenditure by a
rule authorizes ODOT to operate the
understanding this rule. If the rule State, local, or tribal government, in the
Isthmus Slough Bridge one half of the
would affect your small business, aggregate, or by the private sector of
draw on signal if at least 24 hours notice
organization, or governmental $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
is given to the bridge operator, and
jurisdiction, and you have questions more in any one year. Though this rule
reduce the horizontal clearance and
concerning its provisions or options for will not result in such an expenditure,
vertical clearance of the bridge.
compliance, please contact the person we do discuss the effects of this rule
V. Regulatory Analyses listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION elsewhere in this preamble. We received
We developed this rule after CONTACT, above. no (0) comments in the NPRM for this
considering numerous statutes and Small businesses may send comments section.
Executive Orders related to rulemaking. on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine F. Environment
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and compliance with, Federal regulations to We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Orders, and we discuss First the Small Business and Agriculture Department of Homeland Security
Amendment rights of protesters. Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman Management Directive 023–01 and
and the Regional Small Business Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
A. Regulatory Planning and Review Regulatory Fairness Boards. The which guides the Coast Guard in
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 Ombudsman evaluates these actions complying with the National
direct agencies to assess the costs and annually and rates each agency’s Environmental Policy Act of 1969
benefits of available regulatory responsiveness to small business. If you (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
alternatives and, if regulation is wish to comment on actions by have made a determination that this
necessary, to select regulatory employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– action is one of a category of actions
approaches that maximize net benefits. 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The which do not individually or
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies Coast Guard will not retaliate against cumulatively have a significant effect on
to control regulatory costs through a small entities that question or complain the human environment. This rule
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES

budgeting process. This rule has not about this rule or any policy or action simply promulgates the operating
been designated a ‘‘significant of the Coast Guard. regulations or procedures for
regulatory action,’’ under Executive drawbridges. This action is categorically
C. Collection of Information
Order 12866. Accordingly, it has not excluded from further review, under
been reviewed by the Office of This rule calls for no new collection figure 2–1, paragraph (32) (e), of the
Management and Budget (OMB) and of information under the Paperwork Instruction. A Record of Environmental

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:55 Jan 12, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16JAR1.SGM 16JAR1

2062 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 16, 2018 / Rules and Regulations

Consideration and a Memorandum for civil monetary penalties (CMPs) for Adjustment Act to improve the
the Record are not required for this rule. inflation. An initial ‘‘catch-up’’ effectiveness of CMPs and to maintain
adjustment was required by the Federal their deterrent effect.
G. Protest Activities The 2015 Act requires agencies to: (1)
Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act
The Coast Guard respects the First Improvements Act of 2015 (2015 Act), Adjust the level of CMPs with an initial
Amendment rights of protesters. which amended the Federal Civil ‘‘catch-up’’ adjustment through an
Protesters are asked to contact the Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of interim final rule (IFR); and (2) make
person listed in the ‘‘For Further 1990 (Inflation Adjustment Act). These subsequent annual adjustments for
Information Contact’’ section to final regulations provide the 2018 inflation. Catch-up adjustments are
coordinate protest activities so that your annual inflation adjustments being based on the percentage change between
message can be received without made to the penalty amounts in the the Consumer Price Index for all Urban
jeopardizing the safety or security of Department’s final regulations Consumers (CPI–U) for the month of
people, places or vessels. published in the Federal Register on October in the year the penalty was last
April 20, 2017 (2017 final rule). adjusted by a statute other than the
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117 Inflation Adjustment Act, and the
DATES: These regulations are effective
Bridges. January 15, 2018. The adjusted CMPs October 2015 CPI–U. Annual inflation
For the reasons discussed in the established by these regulations are adjustments are based on the percentage
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 applicable only to civil penalties change between the October CPI–U
CFR part 117 as follows: assessed after January 15, 2018, whose preceding the date of each statutory
associated violations occurred after adjustment, and the prior year’s October
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE November 2, 2015. CPI–U.1 The Department published an
OPERATION REGULATIONS IFR with the initial ‘‘catch-up’’ penalty
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
adjustment amounts on August 1, 2016
■ 1. The authority citation for part 117 Levon Schlichter, U.S. Department of (81 FR 50321).
continues to read as follows: Education, Office of the General In these final regulations, based on
Counsel, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, the CPI–U for the month of October
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
and Department of Homeland Security
Room 6E235, Washington, DC 20202– 2017, not seasonally adjusted, we are
Delegation No. 0170.1. 2241. Telephone: (202) 453–6387 or by annually adjusting each CMP amount by
email: levon.schlichter@ed.gov. a multiplier for 2018 of 1.02041, as
§ 117.879 [Suspended] If you use a telecommunications directed by the Office of Management
■ 2. Suspend § 117.879 effective 6 a.m. device for the deaf or a text telephone, and Budget (OMB) Memorandum No.
on February 26, 2018, through 6 p.m. on call the Federal Relay Service, toll free, M–18–03 issued on December 15, 2017.
July 31, 2019. at 1–800–877–8339.
Individuals with disabilities can The Department’s Civil Monetary
■ 3. Add temporary § 117.T879, Penalties
obtain this document in an accessible
effective 6 a.m. on February 26, 2018, format (e.g., braille, large print,
through 6 p.m. on July 31, 2019, to read The following analysis calculates new
audiotape, or compact disc) on request CMPs for penalty statutes in the order
as follows: to the contact person listed in this in which they appear in 34 CFR 36.2.
§ 117.T879 Isthmus Slough. section. The penalty amounts are being adjusted
The draw of the Oregon State SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: up based on the multiplier of 1.02041
secondary highway bridge, mile 1.0, at provided in OMB Memorandum No. M–
Background 18–03.
Coos Bay, shall operate in single leaf,
and open half the draw on signal if at A CMP is defined in the Inflation Statute: 20 U.S.C. 1015(c)(5).
least 24 hours notice is given. The Adjustment Act (28 U.S.C. 2461 note) as Current Regulations: The CMP for 20
vertical clearance of the non-functioning any penalty, fine, or other sanction that U.S.C. 1015(c)(5) (Section 131(c)(5) of
leaf will be reduced up to ten feet. is (1) for a specific monetary amount as the Higher Education Act of 1965, as
provided by Federal law, or has a amended (HEA)), as last set out in
David G. Throop, maximum amount provided for by statute in 1998 (Pub. Law 105–244, title
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Federal law; (2) assessed or enforced by I, § 101(a), October 7, 1998, 112 Stat.
Thirteenth Coast Guard District. an agency pursuant to Federal law; and 1602), is a fine of up to $25,000 for
[FR Doc. 2018–00611 Filed 1–12–18; 8:45 am] (3) assessed or enforced pursuant to an failure by an institution of higher
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P administrative proceeding or a civil education (IHE) to provide information
action in the Federal courts. on the cost of higher education to the
The Inflation Adjustment Act Commissioner of Education Statistics. In
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION provides for the regular evaluation of the 2017 final rule, we increased this
CMPs to ensure that they continue to amount to $36,849.
34 CFR Parts 36 and 668 maintain their deterrent value. The New Regulations: The new penalty for
Inflation Adjustment Act required that this section is $37,601.
[Docket ID ED–2018–OGC–0004] Reason: Using the multiplier of
each agency issue regulations to adjust
RIN 1801–AA17 its CMPs beginning in 1996 and at least 1.02041 from OMB Memorandum No.
every four years thereafter. The M–18–03, the new penalty is calculated
Adjustment of Civil Monetary Penalties
Department published its most recent as follows: $36,849 × 1.02041 =
for Inflation $37,601.09, which makes the adjusted
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES

cost adjustment to its CMPs in the
Federal Register on April 20, 2017 (82 penalty $37,601, when rounded to the
AGENCY: Department of Education.
FR 18559), and those adjustments nearest dollar.
ACTION: Final regulations.
became effective on the date of 1 If a statute that created a penalty is amended to
SUMMARY: The Department of Education publication. change the penalty amount, the Department does
(Department) issues these final The 2015 Act (section 701 of Pub. not adjust the penalty in the year following the
regulations to adjust the Department’s Law 114–74) amended the Inflation adjustment.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:55 Jan 12, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\16JAR1.SGM 16JAR1

Document Created: 2018-01-13 02:02:56
Document Modified: 2018-01-13 02:02:56

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This temporary final rule is effective from 6 a.m. on February 26, 2018 to 6 p.m. on July 31, 2019.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email Steven M. Fischer, Bridge Administrator, Thirteenth Coast Guard District Bridge Program Office, telephone 206-220-7282; email [email protected]
FR Citation		83 FR 2060
RIN Number		1625-AA09

83 FR 2060 - Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Isthmus Slough, Coos Bay, OR

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 10 (January 16, 2018)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard