83 FR 2100 - Oklahoma: Approval of State Coal Combustion Residuals State Permit Program
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 10 (January 16, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 10 (January 16, 2018)
| Page Range | 2100-2104 | |
| FR Document | 2018-00474 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 16, 2018)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 2100-2104] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-00474] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 257 [EPA-HQ-OLEM-2017-0613; FRL-9972-95-OLEM] Oklahoma: Approval of State Coal Combustion Residuals State Permit Program AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comment. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA or Act), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve the application submitted by the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality to allow the Oklahoma Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) state permit program to operate in lieu of the Federal CCR program. EPA has preliminarily determined that Oklahoma's program meets the standard for approval under RCRA. Once approved, the State program requirements and resulting permit provisions will be subject to EPA's inspection and enforcement authorities under RCRA and other applicable statutory and regulatory provisions as discussed below. This notice also announces that EPA is seeking comment on this proposal during a 45-day public comment period, and is providing an opportunity to request a public hearing within the first 15 days of this comment period. DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 2, 2018. In addition, a public hearing request must be submitted on or before January 31, 2018. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ- OLEM-2017-0613, at https://www.regulations.gov or by mail to: EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Jackson, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery, Environmental Protection Agency; telephone number: (703) 308-8453; email address: jackson.mary@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and ``our'' means the EPA. I. General Information A. Overview of Proposed Actions EPA is proposing to approve Oklahoma's CCR state permit program application, pursuant to RCRA 4005(d)(1)(B). Oklahoma's proposed program would allow the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) to enforce rules promulgated under its solid waste statute related to CCR activities in non-Indian Country, as well as to handle permit applications and to enforce permit violations. If approved, Oklahoma's CCR permit program will operate in lieu of the Federal CCR program, codified at 40 CFR part 257, subpart D. This notice also announces that EPA is seeking comment on this proposal, and providing an opportunity to request a public hearing on whether the State's program is at least as protective as the federal program. If there is significant interest shown in holding a public [[Page 2101]] hearing EPA will then hold a public hearing. Please submit any request for a public hearing within the first 15 days of the public comment period through the Contact Us form on the following web page: (https://www.epa.gov/coalash). If the desire for a public hearing is demonstrated EPA will hold the hearing at the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality building located at 707 N Robinson Ave., Oklahoma City, OK on February 13, 2018 starting at 9 a.m. EPA will post a confirmation of the public hearing in the docket and on the EPA CCR website (https://www.epa.gov/coalash) providing information for the hearing. EPA has also engaged federally-recognized Tribes within the State of Oklahoma in consultation and coordination regarding the program authorizations for ODEQ. EPA has established opportunities for formal as well as informal discussion throughout the consultation period, beginning with an initial conference call on October 19, 2017. Tribal consultation will be conducted in accordance with the EPA policy on Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribes (https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2013-08/documents/cons-and-coord-with-indian-tribes-policy.pdf). B. Background CCR are generated from the combustion of coal, including solid fuels classified as anthracite, bituminous, subbituminous, and lignite, for the purpose of generating steam for the purpose of powering a generator to produce electricity or electricity and other thermal energy by electric utilities and independent power producers. CCR includes fly ash, bottom ash, boiler slag, and flue gas desulfurization materials. CCR can be sent off-site for disposal or beneficial use or disposed in on-site landfills or surface impoundments. On April 17, 2015, EPA published a final rule, creating 40 CFR part 257, subpart D, that established a comprehensive set of minimum requirements for the disposal of CCR in landfills and surface impoundments (80 FR 21302). The rule created a self-implementing program which regulates the location, design, operating criteria, and groundwater monitoring and corrective action for CCR disposal, as well as regulating the closure and post-closure care of CCR units and requiring recordkeeping and notifications for CCR units. The regulations do not cover the ``beneficial use'' of CCR as that term is defined in Sec. 257.53. C. Statutory Authority EPA is issuing this proposed determination pursuant to section RCRA sections 4005(d) and 7004(b)(1). See 42 U.S.C. 6945(d), 6974(b)(1). Section 2301 of the 2016 Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation (WIIN) Act amended Section 4005 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), creating a new subsection (d) that establishes a Federal permitting program similar to those under RCRA subtitle C and other environmental statutes. See 42 U.S.C. 6945(d). Under the WIIN Act, states may develop and submit a CCR permit program to EPA for approval; once approved the state permit program operates in lieu of the Federal requirements. See 42 U.S.C. 6945(d)(1)(A). To become approved, the statute requires that a State provide ``evidence of a permit program or other system of prior approval and conditions under State law for regulation by the State of coal combustion residuals units that are located in the State.'' See 42 U.S.C. 6945(d)(1)(A). In addition, the statute directs that the State submit evidence that the program meets the standard in section 4005(d)(1)(B), i.e., that it will require each coal combustion residuals unit located in the State to achieve compliance with either: (1) The Federal CCR requirements at 40 CFR part 257, subpart D; or (2) other State criteria that the Administrator, after consultation with the State, determines to be at least as protective as the Federal requirements. See 42 U.S.C. 6945(d)(1)(B). EPA has 180 days from receiving a complete application to make a final determination, and must provide public notice and an opportunity for public comment. See 42 U.S.C. 6945(d)(1)(B). To receive EPA approval, EPA must determine that the state program requires each CCR unit located in the state to achieve compliance either with the requirements of 40 CFR part 257, subpart D, or with state criteria that EPA determines (after consultation with the State) to be at least as protective as the requirements of 40 CFR part 257, subpart D. See 42 U.S.C. 6945(d)(1)(B). EPA may approve a proposed state permit program in whole or in part. Id. Once a program is approved, EPA must review the program at least every 12 years, as well as no later than 3 years after a revision to an applicable section of 40 CFR part 257, subpart D, or 1 year after any unauthorized significant release from a CCR unit located in the state. See 42 U.S.C. 6945(d)(1)(D)(i)(I)-(III). EPA also must review a program at the request of another state alleging that the soil, groundwater, or surface water of the requesting state is or is likely to be adversely affected by a release from a CCR unit in the approved state. See 42 U.S.C. 6945(d)(1)(D)(i)(IV). In a state with an approved CCR program, EPA may commence administrative or judicial enforcement actions under RCRA Sec. 3008 if the state requests assistance or if the EPA determines that an EPA enforcement action is likely to be necessary to ensure that a CCR unit is operating in accordance with the criteria of the permit program. See 42 U.S.C. 6945(d)(4). II. Oklahoma's Application ODEQ issued a Notice of Rulemaking Intent related to its proposed CCR program and accepted public comments from December 1, 2015 through January 13, 2016. ODEQ then published an Executive Summary rulemaking document that included the public comments received and the ODEQ responses. In September 2016, ODEQ promulgated Oklahoma Administrative Code (OAC) Title 252 Chapter 517 Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals from Electric Utilities, establishing its CCR program. OAC 252:517 incorporates all of the federal regulations at 40 CFR part 257, subpart D, with some minor modifications as discussed below. On July 31, 2017 Oklahoma submitted to EPA its initial application. The State supplemented its original application on October 18, 2017. EPA determined that the application was complete and notified Oklahoma of its determination by letter dated December 21, 2017.\1\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ ODEQ's initial CCR permit program application, subsequent supplementation, and EPA's determination of completeness letter are available in the docket supporting this proposal. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- EPA is aware of six CCR facilities currently in Oklahoma. Approval of ODEQ's CCR application would allow the ODEQ regulations to apply to those existing CCR units as well as any future CCR units not located in Indian country in lieu of the Federal requirements. EPA is not aware of any existing CCR units in Indian country within Oklahoma, but EPA will maintain sole authority to regulate and permit CCR units in Indian country, meaning formal and informal reservations, dependent Indian communities, and Indian allotments, whether restricted or held in trust by the United States. [[Page 2102]] III. EPA Analysis of Oklahoma's Application As discussed in Section I.C. of this notice, the statute requires EPA to evaluate two components of a state program to determine whether it meets the standard for approval. First, EPA is to evaluate the adequacy of the permit program (or other system of prior approval and conditions) itself. See 42 U.S.C. 6945(d)(1)(A). Second, EPA is to evaluate the adequacy of the technical criteria that will be included in each permit, to determine whether they are the same as the federal criteria, or to the extent they differ, whether the modified criteria are ``at least as protective as'' the federal requirements. See 42 U.S.C. 6945(d)(1)(B). Only if both components meet the statutory requirements may EPA approve the program. See 42 U.S.C. 6945(d)(1). On that basis, EPA conducted an analysis of ODEQ's application, including a thorough analysis of OAC 252:517 and its adoption of 40 CFR part 257, subpart D. Based on this analysis, EPA has preliminarily determined that ODEQ's submitted CCR permit program meets the standard for approval in section 4005(d)(1)(A) and (B). EPA is therefore proposing to approve Oklahoma's application. Oklahoma's program contains all the elements of the federal rule, including requirements for location restrictions, design and operating criteria, groundwater monitoring and corrective action, closure requirements and post-closure care, recordkeeping, notification and internet posting requirements. It also contains state-specific language, references and state-specific requirements that differ from the federal rule, which EPA has preliminarily determined to be at least as protective as the Federal criteria. EPA's analysis and preliminary findings are discussed in greater detail below and in the Technical Support Document. Non-substantive changes include language inserts and deletions to enable the ODEQ to permit CCR units and enforce the Oklahoma rule. The revisions include: The removal of statements regarding national applicability; the inclusion of language to require submittal and approval of plans to ODEQ; the inclusion of permitting provisions to allow the ODEQ to administer the CCR rules in the context of a permitting program; the inclusion of state-specific location restrictions; the inclusion of procedures for subsurface investigation; the inclusion of provisions addressing cost estimates and financial assurance. Throughout Oklahoma's Chapter 517 rules, references for tribal notifications and/or approval that appear in the federal rule have been deleted along with the terms ``Indian Country,'' ``Indian Lands,'' and ``Indian Tribe.'' EPA will retain sole authority to regulate and permit CCR units in Indian country as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151, which includes reservations, dependent Indian communities, and Indian allotments, whether restricted or held in trust by the United States. EPA treats as reservations trust lands validly set aside for the use of a tribe even if the trust lands have not been formally designated as a reservation. See, e.g., Oklahoma Tax Commission vs. Citizen Band Potawatomi Indian Tribe of Oklahoma, 498 U.S. 505, 511 (1991). A. Adequacy of Oklahoma's Permit Program RCRA section 4005(d)(1)(A) requires a State seeking program approval to submit to EPA an application with ``evidence of a permit program or other system of prior approval and conditions under State law for regulation by the State of coal combustion residuals units that are located in the State.'' RCRA section 4005(d)(1)(A) does not require EPA to promulgate regulations for determining the adequacy of State programs. EPA is therefore relying in large measure on the existing regulations in 40 CFR part 239, Requirements for State Permit Program Determination of Adequacy, on the statutory requirements for public participation in RCRA Section 7004, and on the Agency's experience in reviewing and approving State programs in general. However, in order to aid States in developing their programs and to provide a clear statement of how, in EPA's judgment, the existing regulations and statutory requirements in both 4005(d) and 7004 apply to state CCR programs, on August 15, 2017 EPA announced the availability of an interim final Guidance for Coal Combustion Residuals State Permit Programs (82 FR 38685). This guidance outlines the process and procedures EPA generally intends to use to review and make determinations on State CCR permit programs. EPA evaluated the adequacy of ODEQ's permit program based on the statutory requirements and EPA's interpretation of the regulatory requirements. A summary of EPA's findings are below, organized by the program elements identified in the Part 239 regulations and the guidance document; our detailed analysis of the submitted State program can be found in the Technical Support Document which is included in the docket for this proposal. 1. Permitting Guidelines Based on section 7004 and on the part 239 regulations, it is EPA's judgment (as expressed in the interim final guidance) that an adequate permitting program will provide for public participation by ensuring that: Documents for permit determinations are made available for public review and comment; final determinations on permit applications are made known to the public; and public comments on permit determinations are considered. All environmental permit and modification applications in Oklahoma are subject to the Oklahoma Uniform Environmental Permitting Act (UEPA) and the permitting rules promulgated to carry out UEPA. UEPA classifies all permit applications into three tiers that determine the level of public participation and administrative review the permit application will receive. See OAC 252:4-7-2. Oklahoma classifies solid waste management applications, including CCR applications, into their respective tiers at OAC 252:4-7-58 through 60. All permit documents, regardless of tier, are available for review and copying. OAC 252:4-1- 5. Oklahoma describes the Tier I program as ``the category for those things that are basically administrative decisions which can be made by a technical supervisor with no public participation except for the landowner.'' OAC 252:4-7-2. The Tier I permit application requires an application, notice to the landowner, and Department review. 27A O.S. Sec. 2-14-103(9). Only applications for minor modifications, lateral expansions within the permit boundary below a certain capacity, and approval of technical plans fall within the Tier I category. OAC 252:4- 7-58. The Tier II permit application process expands upon the Tier I requirements to include published notice of the application filing and published notice of the draft permit or denial and opportunity for a public meeting. 27A O.S. Sec. 2-14-103(10). The Tier II process covers new permits for on-site CCR disposal units and more substantial modifications to existing facilities beyond Tier I. OAC 252:4-7-59. The Tier III permit application process includes the requirements of Tiers I and II and adds notice of an opportunity for a process meeting, response to public comments, and notice of an opportunity for an administrative permit hearing. 27A O.S. Sec. 2-14-103(11). The Tier III process covers new permits for off-site disposal [[Page 2103]] units and permits for some significant modifications to off-site disposal units. OAC 252:4-7-60. UEPA provides for public notice and review of permit applications and significant permit modifications through its Tier II and III programs. Tier II and III programs also provide the opportunity for public hearing, and, in the case of Tier III applications, the opportunity for an administrative hearing. These programs appear to provide adequate opportunities for public participation in the permitting process, and the application of UEPA to the CCR permitting program is consistent with Oklahoma's practice across environmental programs. Permit and modification applications for CCR facilities fall under the existing solid waste management application at OAC 252:4-7-58 through 60, and those classifications are used for Oklahoma's authorized Municipal Solid Waste Landfill program. 2. Guidelines for Compliance Monitoring Authority Based on the part 239 regulations, it is EPA's judgment (as expressed in the interim final guidance), that a state's application for permit program approval should demonstrate that the state has the authority to gather information about compliance, perform inspections, and ensure that information it gathers is suitable for enforcement. ODEQ has compliance monitoring authority under 27A O.S. Sec. 2-3- 501, allowing for inspections, sampling, information gathering, and other investigation. This authority extends to ODEQ's proposed CCR permit program and would provide the authority to adequately gather information for enforcement. 3. Guidelines for Enforcement Authority Further, based on the part 239 regulations, it is EPA's judgment (as expressed in the interim final guidance), that a state's application for permit program approval should demonstrate that the state has authority to administer RCRA Sec. 4005(c)(1)(B) and (C) programs to have adequate enforcement authority to administer those programs, including: The authority to restrain any person from engaging in activity which may damage human health or the environment, the authority to sue to enjoin prohibited activity, and the authority to sue to recover civil penalties for prohibited activity. ODEQ appears to have adequate enforcement authority for its existing programs under 27A O.S. Sec. 2-3-501-507 and that authority extends to ODEQ's proposed CCR permit program. 4. Intervention in Civil Enforcement Proceedings Based on section 7004 and on the part 239 regulations, it is EPA's judgment (as expressed in the interim final guidance) that a state application for permit program approval should demonstrate that the state provides adequate opportunity for citizen intervention in civil enforcement proceedings through the requirements found in 40 CFR 239.9. In general, those requirements state that the state must provide authority to allow citizen intervention or provide assurance of (1) a notice and public involvement process, (2) investigating and providing responses about violations, and (3) not opposing intervention when permitted by statute, rule, or regulation. ODEQ's CCR program appears to satisfy the civil intervention requirement (40 CFR 239.9(a)) by allowing intervention by right. (see 12 OK Stat Sec. 12-2024). In addition, ODEQ's CCR program would satisfy the requirements of 40 CFR 239.9(b) by providing a process to respond to citizen complaints (see 27A O.S. Sec. 2-3-101,503) and by not opposing citizen intervention when allowed by statute (see 27A O.S. Sec. 2-7-133). ODEQ in meeting 40 CFR 239.9(b)(2) has an extremely robust process for responding to citizen complaints. In 27A O.S. Sec. 2-3-101-F-1, The complaints program is responsible for intake processing, mediation and conciliation of inquiries and complaints received by the Department and which shall provide for the expedient resolution of complaints within the jurisdiction of the Department. In 27A O.S. Sec. 2-3-503, if the Department undertakes an enforcement action as a result of a complaint, the Department shall notify the complainant of the enforcement action by mail. The State program in 27A O.S. Sec. 2-3-503 offers the complainant an opportunity to provide written information pertinent to the complaint within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date of the mailing. The State's program also goes further in 27A O.S. Sec. 2-3-104 that the complaints program shall, in addition to the responsibilities specified by Section 2-3-101 of this title, refer, upon written request, all complaints in which one of the complainants remains unsatisfied with the Department's resolution of said complaint to an outside source trained in mediation. It is clear that ODEQ takes public intervention seriously in enforcement actions considering the additional elements of the State's complaint process. EPA has preliminarily determined that these requirements allow a minimum necessary level of citizen involvement in the enforcement process. B. Adequacy of Technical Criteria EPA has preliminarily determined that ODEQ's submitted CCR permit program generally meets the standard for approval in RCRA section 4005(d)(1)(B)(i), as it will require each CCR unit located in Oklahoma to achieve compliance with the applicable criteria for CCR units under 40 CFR part 257. To make this preliminary determination, EPA compared ODEQ's proposed CCR permit program to 40 CFR part 257 to determine whether it differed from the federal requirements, and if so, whether those differences met the standard for approval in RCRA section 4005(d)(1)(B)(ii) and (C). Oklahoma has adopted all of the technical criteria at 40 CFR part 257, subpart D into its regulations at OAC Title 252 Chapter 517. While ODEQ's CCR permit program also includes some modification of 40 CFR part 257, subpart D, the majority of ODEQ's modifications were merely those that were needed to allow the State to implement the part 257 criteria through a permit process. As mentioned above, the 40 CFR part 257, subpart D rules were meant to be implemented directly by the regulated facility, without the oversight of any regulatory authority, such as a state permitting program. For example, ODEQ removed 40 CFR 257.61(a)(2)(iv), which references the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act requirements because Oklahoma does not have any coastal or ocean environments which apply under the MPRSA regulations. EPA considers these revisions to be ministerial, and as such, they do not substantively modify the federal technical criteria. ODEQ also made a few minor changes to the 40 CFR 257, Subpart D criteria. These changes reflect the integration of the CCR rules with the responsibilities of other state agencies or state specific conditions. There are a few minor changes that were made inadvertently that will be changed by the State through another rulemaking, including a typographic error in Chapter 517-9-4(g)(5) and removal of the words ``and the leachate collection and removal'' from 40 CFR 257.70(e). The State has acknowledged these differences and has plans to correct any errors. Additional changes include removal of the web link to EPA publication SW-846 under the definition ``Representative Sample'' in 40 CFR 257.53; and the replacement of 40 CFR 257.91(e) with a reference to the [[Page 2104]] Oklahoma Water Resources Board (OWRB) Section 785:35-7-2. After review of this OWRB regulation, an EPA groundwater expert finds the Oklahoma rules to be more stringent than the requirements under 40 CFR 257.91(e). EPA preliminarily finds these changes to be minor because the key aspects of the CCR program including requirements for location restrictions, design and operating criteria, groundwater monitoring and corrective action, closure requirements and post-closure care, recordkeeping, notification and internet posting requirements are not substantially changed or reduced by the Oklahoma revisions and in one example is more stringent. These changes do not keep the overall program from being at least as protective as 40 CFR part 257, subpart D. EPA's full analysis of Oklahoma's CCR permit program can be found in the Technical Support Document (TSD) located in the docket for this notice. IV. Proposed Action In accordance with 42 U.S.C. 6945(d), EPA is proposing to wholly approve ODEQ's CCR permit program application. Dated: January 3, 2018. Barry N. Breen, Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Land and Emergency Management. [FR Doc. 2018-00474 Filed 1-12-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![2100 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 16, 2018 / Proposed Rules
VI. Statutory and Executive Order tribal implications and will not impose ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
Reviews substantial direct costs on tribal identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
Under the Clean Air Act, the governments or preempt tribal law as OLEM–2017–0613, at https://
Administrator is required to approve a specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 www.regulations.gov or by mail to: EPA
SIP submission that complies with the FR 67249, November 9, 2000). Docket Center, Environmental
provisions of the Act and applicable Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T,
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Environmental protection, Air Washington, DC 20460. Follow the
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP pollution control, Carbon monoxide, online instructions for submitting
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve Incorporation by reference, comments. Once submitted, comments
state choices, provided that they meet Intergovernmental relations, Lead, cannot be edited or removed from
the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate regulations.gov. The EPA may publish
Accordingly, this proposed action matter, Reporting and recordkeeping any comment received to its public
merely approves state law as meeting requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile docket. Do not submit electronically any
Federal requirements and does not organic compounds. information you consider to be
impose additional requirements beyond
Dated: January 2, 2018. Confidential Business Information (CBI)
those imposed by state law. For that
Ken Moraff, or other information whose disclosure is
reason, this proposed action:
restricted by statute. Multimedia
• Is not a significant regulatory action Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New
England. submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
subject to review by the Office of
[FR Doc. 2018–00477 Filed 1–12–18; 8:45 am] accompanied by a written comment.
Management and Budget under The written comment is considered the
Executive Orders12866 (58 FR 51735, BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
official comment and should include
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, discussion of all points you wish to
January 21, 2011); make. The EPA will generally not
• Does not impose an information ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY consider comments or comment
collection burden under the provisions contents located outside of the primary
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 40 CFR Part 257 submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); other file sharing system). For the full
• Is certified as not having a [EPA–HQ–OLEM–2017–0613; FRL–9972–
EPA public comment policy,
significant economic impact on a 95–OLEM]
information about CBI or multimedia
substantial number of small entities submissions, and general guidance on
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 Oklahoma: Approval of State Coal
Combustion Residuals State Permit making effective comments, please visit
U.S.C. 601 et seq.); https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
• Does not contain any unfunded Program
commenting-epa-dockets.
mandate or significantly or uniquely AGENCY: Environmental Protection
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
affect small governments, as described Agency (EPA).
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Mary Jackson, Office of Resource
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); Conservation and Recovery,
for comment. Environmental Protection Agency;
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Resource telephone number: (703) 308–8453;
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA email address: jackson.mary@epa.gov.
1999); or Act), the Environmental Protection SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
• Is not an economically significant Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
regulatory action based on health or the application submitted by the and ‘‘our’’ means the EPA.
safety risks subject to Executive Order Oklahoma Department of Environmental I. General Information
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Quality to allow the Oklahoma Coal
• Is not a significant regulatory action Combustion Residuals (CCR) state A. Overview of Proposed Actions
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR permit program to operate in lieu of the EPA is proposing to approve
28355, May 22, 2001); Federal CCR program. EPA has Oklahoma’s CCR state permit program
• Is not subject to requirements of preliminarily determined that application, pursuant to RCRA
Section 12(d) of the National Oklahoma’s program meets the standard 4005(d)(1)(B). Oklahoma’s proposed
Technology Transfer and Advancement for approval under RCRA. Once program would allow the Oklahoma
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because approved, the State program Department of Environmental Quality
application of those requirements would requirements and resulting permit (ODEQ) to enforce rules promulgated
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; provisions will be subject to EPA’s under its solid waste statute related to
and inspection and enforcement authorities CCR activities in non-Indian Country, as
• Does not provide EPA with the under RCRA and other applicable well as to handle permit applications
discretionary authority to address, as statutory and regulatory provisions as and to enforce permit violations. If
appropriate, disproportionate human discussed below. This notice also approved, Oklahoma’s CCR permit
health or environmental effects, using announces that EPA is seeking comment program will operate in lieu of the
practicable and legally permissible on this proposal during a 45-day public Federal CCR program, codified at 40
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
methods, under Executive Order 12898 comment period, and is providing an CFR part 257, subpart D.
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). opportunity to request a public hearing This notice also announces that EPA
In addition, the SIP is not approved within the first 15 days of this comment is seeking comment on this proposal,
to apply on any Indian reservation land period. and providing an opportunity to request
or in any other area where EPA or an DATES: Comments must be received on a public hearing on whether the State’s
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a or before March 2, 2018. In addition, a program is at least as protective as the
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of public hearing request must be federal program. If there is significant
Indian country, the rule does not have submitted on or before January 31, 2018. interest shown in holding a public
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:42 Jan 12, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16JAP1.SGM 16JAP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_2110/page/1.svg)
![2104 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 16, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Oklahoma Water Resources Board DATES: Comments are due on or before on ending the Commission’s previous
(OWRB) Section 785:35–7–2. After January 24, 2018, and reply comments preemption of states’ role in designating
review of this OWRB regulation, an EPA are due on or before February 23, 2018. certain eligible telecommunications
groundwater expert finds the Oklahoma If you anticipate that you will be carriers and removing the Lifeline
rules to be more stringent than the submitting comments, but find it Broadband Provider designation;
requirements under 40 CFR 257.91(e). difficult to do so within the period of targeting Lifeline funds to facilities-
EPA preliminarily finds these changes time allowed by this document, you based broadband-capable networks
to be minor because the key aspects of should advise the contact listed below offering both voice and broadband
the CCR program including as soon as possible. services; adopting a self-enforcing
requirements for location restrictions, ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, budget cap for the program; improving
design and operating criteria, identified by WC Docket Nos. 17–287, the eligibility verification and
groundwater monitoring and corrective 11–42, and 09–197, by any of the recertification processes to further
action, closure requirements and post- following methods: prevent waste, fraud, and abuse in the
closure care, recordkeeping, notification • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// program; and improving providers’
and internet posting requirements are www.regulations.gov. Follow the incentive to provide quality
not substantially changed or reduced by instructions for submitting comments. communications services by
the Oklahoma revisions and in one • Federal Communications establishing a maximum discount level
example is more stringent. These Commission’s website: http:// for Lifeline-supported service. In the
changes do not keep the overall program fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/. Follow the Notice of Inquiry, the Commission seeks
from being at least as protective as 40 instructions for submitting comments. comment on how Lifeline might more
CFR part 257, subpart D. EPA’s full • People with Disabilities: Contact the efficiently target funds to areas and
analysis of Oklahoma’s CCR permit FCC to request reasonable households most in need of help in
program can be found in the Technical accommodations (accessible format obtaining digital opportunity.
Support Document (TSD) located in the documents, sign language interpreters, II. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
docket for this notice. CART, etc.) by email: FCC504@fcc.gov
2. In this Notice of Proposed
IV. Proposed Action or phone: (202) 418–0530 or TTY: (202)
Rulemaking, the Commission proposes
418–0432.
In accordance with 42 U.S.C. 6945(d), For detailed instructions for submitting and seeks comment on reforms to
EPA is proposing to wholly approve ensure that the Commission is
comments and additional information
ODEQ’s CCR permit program administering the Lifeline program on
on the rulemaking process, see the
application. sound legal footing, recognizing the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
Dated: January 3, 2018. important and Congressionally
this document.
Barry N. Breen, mandated role of states in Lifeline
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: program administration, and rooting out
Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator, Jodie Griffin, Wireline Competition
Office of Land and Emergency Management. waste, fraud, and abuse in the program.
Bureau, (202) 418–7400 or TTY: (202) These steps must precede broader
[FR Doc. 2018–00474 Filed 1–12–18; 8:45 am] 418–0484. discussions about how the Lifeline
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a program can be updated to effectively
summary of the Commission’s Notice of bring digital opportunity to those who
Proposed Rulemaking and Notice of are currently on the wrong side of the
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS Inquiry (NPRM and NOI) in WC Docket digital divide.
COMMISSION Nos. 17–287, 11–42, 09–197; FCC 17– 3. The Commission first seeks
155, adopted on November 16, 2017 and comment on ways the Commission can
47 CFR Part 54 released on December 1, 2017. The full better accommodate the important and
[WC Docket Nos. 17–287, 11–42, 09–197; text of this document is available for lawful role of the states in the Lifeline
FCC 17–155] public inspection during regular program. The Commission proposes to
business hours in the FCC Reference eliminate the Lifeline Broadband
Bridging the Digital Divide for Low- Center, Room CY–A257, 445 12th Street Provider category of ETCs and the state
Income Consumers, Lifeline and Link SW, Washington, DC 20554 or at the preemption on which it is based. The
Up Reform and Modernization, following internet address: http:// Commission also seeks comment on
Telecommunications Carriers Eligible transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_ ways to encourage cooperative
for Universal Service Support Business/2017/db1201/FCC-17- federalism between the states and the
AGENCY: Federal Communications 155A1.pdf. The Fourth Report and Commission to make the National
Commission. Order, Order on Reconsideration and Verifier a success.
ACTION: Proposed rule. Memorandum Opinion and Order that 4. In this section, the Commission
was adopted concurrently with the addresses the serious concerns that have
SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal NPRM and NOI are published elsewhere been raised that the Commission’s
Communications Commission in this issue of the Federal Register. creation of Lifeline Broadband Provider
(Commission) proposes and seeks (LBP) ETCs and preemption of state
comment on reforms to ensure the I. Introduction commissions’ designations of such LBPs
Lifeline program rules comport with the 1. In this Notice of Proposed was inconsistent with the role
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
authority granted to the Commission in Rulemaking, the Commission proposes contemplated for the states in Section
the Communications Act and to curb and seeks comment on reforms to 214 of the Act. In the 2016 Lifeline
wasteful and abusive spending in the ensure the Lifeline program rules Order, 81 FR 33026, May 24, 2016, the
Lifeline program. The Commission also comport with the authority granted to Commission established a framework to
seeks comment on how Lifeline might the Commission in the Communications designate providers as Lifeline
more efficiently target funds to areas Act and to curb wasteful and abusive Broadband Providers (LBPs), eligible to
and households most in need of help in spending in the Lifeline program. receive Lifeline reimbursement for
obtaining digital opportunity. Specifically, the NPRM seeks comment qualifying broadband internet access
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:42 Jan 12, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\16JAP1.SGM 16JAP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_2110/page/5.svg)
Document Created: 2018-01-13 02:02:21
Document Modified: 2018-01-13 02:02:21
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Notice of availability; request for comment. | |
| Dates | Comments must be received on or before March 2, 2018. In addition, a public hearing request must be submitted on or before January 31, 2018. | |
| Contact | Mary Jackson, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery, Environmental Protection Agency; telephone | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 2100 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR