83 FR 21194 - Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 90 (May 9, 2018)
Federal Aviation Administration
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 90 (May 9, 2018)
| Page Range | 21194-21196 | |
| FR Document | 2018-09742 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 9, 2018)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 21194-21196] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-09742] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-2018-0384; Product Identifier 2017-SW-061-AD] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for Airbus Helicopters Model AS-365N2, AS 365 N3, EC 155B, EC155B1, SA- 365N1, and SA-366G1 helicopters. This proposed AD would require repetitive inspections of the aft fuselage outer skin. This proposed AD is prompted by several reports of aft fuselage outer skin disbonding. The actions of this proposed AD are intended to address an unsafe condition on these products. DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 9, 2018. ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for sending your comments electronically. Fax: 202-493-2251. Mail: Send comments to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001. Hand Delivery: Deliver to the ``Mail'' address between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018- 0384; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, the economic evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for Docket Operations (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt. For service information identified in this proposed rule, contact Airbus Helicopters, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75052; telephone (972) 641-0000 or (800) 232-0323; fax (972) 641-3775; or at http://www.helicopters.airbus.com/website/en/ref/Technical-Support_73.html. You may review the referenced service information at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy, Room 6N-321, Fort Worth, TX 76177. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Fuller, Senior Aviation Safety Engineer, Safety Management Section, Rotorcraft Standards Branch, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone (817) 222-5110; email [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: [[Page 21195]] Comments Invited We invite you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting written comments, data, or views. We also invite comments relating to the economic, environmental, energy, or federalism impacts that might result from adopting the proposals in this document. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. To ensure the docket does not contain duplicate comments, commenters should send only one copy of written comments, or if comments are filed electronically, commenters should submit only one time. We will file in the docket all comments that we receive, as well as a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel concerning this proposed rulemaking. Before acting on this proposal, we will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing date for comments. We will consider comments filed after the comment period has closed if it is possible to do so without incurring expense or delay. We may change this proposal in light of the comments we receive. Discussion EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA AD No. 2017-0165, dated September 5, 2017 (EASA AD 2017-0165), to correct an unsafe condition for Airbus Helicopters Model SA 365 N1, AS 365 N2, AS 365 N3, SA 366 G1, EC 155 B and EC 155 B1 helicopters. EASA advises of several reports of aft fuselage (baggage compartment area) outer skin disbonding found during a 600-hour inspection. EASA advises that most of the reports of disbonding occurred on Model EC 155 helicopters and may occur in the same area on Model AS 365, SA 365, and SA 366 helicopters due to design similarity. According to EASA, the cause of the disbonding has not yet been determined and the investigation is continuing. Airbus Helicopters states possible causes that are being considered include exhaust gas heat from the exhaust pipes and environmental conditions. EASA states that this condition, if not detected and corrected, could reduce the structural integrity of the aft fuselage, possibly affecting safe flight and landing. To address this unsafe condition, EASA AD 2017-0165 requires a repetitive tap inspection of the aft fuselage outer skin for disbonding, a repetitive visual inspection of the aft fuselage outer skin for distortion, wrinkling, and corrosion, and contacting Airbus Helicopters if there is any disbonding. FAA's Determination These helicopters have been approved by the aviation authority of France and are approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to our bilateral agreement with France, EASA, its technical representative, has notified us of the unsafe condition described in its AD. We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all known relevant information and determined that an unsafe condition is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type design. Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51 We reviewed Airbus Helicopters Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No. AS365-05.00.77 for Model AS365 N, N1, N2, and N3 and non-FAA- certificated Model AS365 F, Fs, Fi, K, and K2 helicopters; ASB No. SA366-05.48 for Model SA366 G1 and non-FAA-certificated Model SA366 GA helicopters; and ASB No. EC155-05A033 for Model EC155 B and B1 helicopters, all Revision 0 and all dated July 21, 2017. This service information specifies repetitive tap and visual inspections between aft fuselage outer skin frames X4630 and X6630 and defines the allowable limit of disbonding for this area. If there is distortion, wrinkling, or corrosion, this service information specifies performing a tap inspection. If there is disbonding within the allowable limit, this service information specifies reporting the inspection results to Airbus Helicopters and performing the recurring tap inspection at a shorter compliance time interval. If there is disbonding that exceeds the allowable limit, this service information specifies contacting Airbus Helicopters for repair before further flight. This service information is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section. Proposed AD Requirements This proposed AD would require, within 110 hours time-in-service (TIS), a tap inspection of the aft fuselage outer skin for disbonding. If there is no disbonding, repeating the tap inspection at intervals not to exceed 660 hours TIS would be required. If there is disbonding, either repeating the tap inspections at intervals not to exceed 110 hours TIS or repairing or replacing the panel before further flight and then tap inspecting the panel at intervals not to exceed 660 hours TIS would be required. This proposed AD would also require, within 220 hours TIS and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 110 hours TIS, cleaning the aft fuselage outer skin and visually inspecting for distortion, wrinkling, and corrosion. If there is any distortion, wrinkling, or corrosion, tap inspecting the area for disbonding would be required before further flight. Differences Between This Proposed AD and the EASA AD If there is disbonding within the allowable limit, the EASA AD specifies reporting the inspection results to Airbus Helicopters, whereas this proposed AD would not. If there is disbonding that exceeds the allowable limit, the EASA AD specifies contacting Airbus Helicopters for approved skin panel repair or replacement instructions, whereas this proposed AD would require repairing or replacing the panel instead. Interim Action We consider this proposed AD to be an interim action. If final action is later identified, we might consider further rulemaking then. Costs of Compliance We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 46 helicopters of U.S. Registry. We estimate that operators may incur the following costs in order to comply with this AD. Labor costs are estimated at $85 per work-hour. Tap inspecting the aft fuselage outer skin would take about 3 work- hours for an estimated cost of $255 per helicopter and $11,730 for the U.S. fleet per inspection cycle. Visually inspecting the aft fuselage outer skin would take about 0.3 work-hour for an estimated cost of $26 per helicopter and $1,196 for the U.S. fleet per inspection cycle. Repairing a panel would take about 5 work-hours and parts would cost about $500 for an estimated cost of $925. Replacing a panel would take about 10 work-hours and parts would cost about $20,000 for an estimated cost of $20,850. Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in ``Subtitle VII, [[Page 21196]] Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. Regulatory Findings We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed, I certify this proposed regulation: 1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent that it justifies making a regulatory distinction; and 4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. The Proposed Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 0 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. Sec. 39.13 [Amended] 0 2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD): Airbus Helicopters: Docket No. FAA-2018-0384; Product Identifier 2017-SW-061-AD. (a) Applicability This AD applies to Model AS-365N2, AS 365 N3, EC 155B, EC155B1, SA-365N1, and SA-366G1 helicopters, certificated in any category. (b) Unsafe Condition This AD defines the unsafe condition as disbonding of the aft fuselage outer skin. This condition could result in loss of aft fuselage structural integrity and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. (c) Comments Due Date We must receive comments by July 9, 2018. (d) Compliance You are responsible for performing each action required by this AD within the specified compliance time unless it has already been accomplished prior to that time. (e) Required Actions (1) Within 110 hours time-in-service (TIS), tap inspect the aft fuselage outer skin for disbonding between frames X4630 and X6630 in the areas depicted in Figure 1 of Airbus Helicopters Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No. AS365-05.00.77, ASB No. SA366-05.48, or ASB No. EC155-05A033, all Revision 0 and dated July 21, 2017 (ASB AS365- 05.00.77, ASB SA366-05.48, or ASB EC155-05A033), as applicable for your model helicopter. Examples of acceptable and unacceptable disbonding areas are depicted in Figure 2 of ASB AS365-05.00.77, ASB SA366-05.48, and ASB EC155-05A033, as applicable for your model helicopter. (i) If there is no disbonding, repeat the tap inspection at intervals not to exceed 660 hours TIS. (ii) If there is disbonding within one square-shaped area measuring 3.94 in. x 3.94 in. (10 cm x 10 cm) that does not cross two skin panels, repeat the tap inspection at intervals not to exceed 110 hours TIS. (iii) If there is disbonding that exceeds one square-shaped area measuring 3.94 in. x 3.94 in. (10 cm x 10 cm) or crosses two skin panels, before further flight, repair or replace the panel. Thereafter, tap inspect the panel at intervals not to exceed 660 hours TIS. (2) Within 220 hours TIS, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 110 hours TIS, clean the aft fuselage outer skin and using a light, visually inspect for distortion, wrinkling, and corrosion between frames X4630 and X6630 as depicted in Figure 1 of ASB AS365- 05.00.77, ASB SA366-05.48, or ASB EC155-05A033, as applicable for your model helicopter. If there is any distortion, wrinkling, or corrosion, before further flight, tap inspect the area for disbonding by following the inspection instructions in paragraph (e)(1) of this AD. (f) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) (1) The Manager, Safety Management Section, Rotorcraft Standards Branch, FAA, may approve AMOCs for this AD. Send your proposal to: Matt Fuller, Senior Aviation Safety Engineer, Safety Management Section, Rotorcraft Standards Branch, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone (817) 222-5110; email [email protected]. (2) For operations conducted under a 14 CFR part 119 operating certificate or under 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that you notify your principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office or certificate holding district office before operating any aircraft complying with this AD through an AMOC. (g) Additional Information The subject of this AD is addressed in European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No. 2017-0165, dated September 5, 2017. You may view the EASA AD on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov in the AD Docket. (h) Subject Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 5302, Rotorcraft tail boom. Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on April 26, 2018. Lance T. Gant, Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division,Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2018-09742 Filed 5-8-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
![21196 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 90 / Wednesday, May 9, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: (a) Applicability (2) For operations conducted under a 14
General requirements.’’ Under that This AD applies to Model AS–365N2, AS CFR part 119 operating certificate or under
section, Congress charges the FAA with 365 N3, EC 155B, EC155B1, SA–365N1, and 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in SA–366G1 helicopters, certificated in any you notify your principal inspector, or
category. lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
air commerce by prescribing regulations the local flight standards district office or
for practices, methods, and procedures (b) Unsafe Condition certificate holding district office before
the Administrator finds necessary for This AD defines the unsafe condition as operating any aircraft complying with this
safety in air commerce. This regulation disbonding of the aft fuselage outer skin. This AD through an AMOC.
is within the scope of that authority condition could result in loss of aft fuselage
(g) Additional Information
because it addresses an unsafe condition structural integrity and subsequent loss of
that is likely to exist or develop on control of the helicopter. The subject of this AD is addressed in
products identified in this rulemaking European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
(c) Comments Due Date No. 2017–0165, dated September 5, 2017.
action.
We must receive comments by July 9, 2018. You may view the EASA AD on the internet
Regulatory Findings at http://www.regulations.gov in the AD
(d) Compliance
Docket.
We determined that this proposed AD You are responsible for performing each
would not have federalism implications action required by this AD within the (h) Subject
under Executive Order 13132. This specified compliance time unless it has Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC)
proposed AD would not have a already been accomplished prior to that time. Code: 5302, Rotorcraft tail boom.
substantial direct effect on the States, on (e) Required Actions Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on April 26,
the relationship between the national 2018.
(1) Within 110 hours time-in-service (TIS),
Government and the States, or on the tap inspect the aft fuselage outer skin for Lance T. Gant,
distribution of power and disbonding between frames X4630 and Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
responsibilities among the various X6630 in the areas depicted in Figure 1 of Division,Aircraft Certification Service.
levels of government. Airbus Helicopters Alert Service Bulletin
[FR Doc. 2018–09742 Filed 5–8–18; 8:45 am]
For the reasons discussed, I certify (ASB) No. AS365–05.00.77, ASB No. SA366–
this proposed regulation: 05.48, or ASB No. EC155–05A033, all BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory Revision 0 and dated July 21, 2017 (ASB
action’’ under Executive Order 12866; AS365–05.00.77, ASB SA366–05.48, or ASB
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the EC155–05A033), as applicable for your DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures model helicopter. Examples of acceptable
and unacceptable disbonding areas are Federal Aviation Administration
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
depicted in Figure 2 of ASB AS365–05.00.77,
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in ASB SA366–05.48, and ASB EC155–05A033,
Alaska to the extent that it justifies 14 CFR Part 39
as applicable for your model helicopter.
making a regulatory distinction; and (i) If there is no disbonding, repeat the tap [Docket No. FAA–2018–0395; Product
4. Will not have a significant inspection at intervals not to exceed 660 Identifier 2017–NM–136–AD]
economic impact, positive or negative, hours TIS.
on a substantial number of small entities (ii) If there is disbonding within one RIN 2120–AA64
under the criteria of the Regulatory square-shaped area measuring 3.94 in. x 3.94
in. (10 cm x 10 cm) that does not cross two Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation skin panels, repeat the tap inspection at Airplanes
of the estimated costs to comply with intervals not to exceed 110 hours TIS.
(iii) If there is disbonding that exceeds one AGENCY: Federal Aviation
this proposed AD and placed it in the square-shaped area measuring 3.94 in. x 3.94 Administration (FAA), DOT.
AD docket. in. (10 cm x 10 cm) or crosses two skin ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 panels, before further flight, repair or replace (NPRM).
the panel. Thereafter, tap inspect the panel
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation at intervals not to exceed 660 hours TIS. SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
safety, Incorporation by reference, (2) Within 220 hours TIS, and thereafter at airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Safety. intervals not to exceed 110 hours TIS, clean
Airbus Model A330–200 Freighter series
the aft fuselage outer skin and using a light,
The Proposed Amendment visually inspect for distortion, wrinkling, and airplanes, Model A330–200 series
corrosion between frames X4630 and X6630 airplanes, Model A330–300 series
Accordingly, under the authority
as depicted in Figure 1 of ASB AS365– airplanes, Model A340–200 series
delegated to me by the Administrator,
05.00.77, ASB SA366–05.48, or ASB EC155– airplanes, Model A340–300 series
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
05A033, as applicable for your model airplanes, Model A340–500 series
39 as follows: helicopter. If there is any distortion, airplanes, and Model A340–600 series
wrinkling, or corrosion, before further flight, airplanes. This proposed AD was
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS tap inspect the area for disbonding by
DIRECTIVES prompted by a report of deficient fatigue
following the inspection instructions in
paragraph (e)(1) of this AD. performance of high strength steel used
■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 in forgings. Components made from the
continues to read as follows: (f) Alternative Methods of Compliance affected high strength steel are installed
(AMOCs) on the main landing gear (MLG), nose
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
(1) The Manager, Safety Management landing gear (NLG), and center landing
§ 39.13 [Amended] Section, Rotorcraft Standards Branch, FAA, gear (CLG). This proposed AD would
■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding may approve AMOCs for this AD. Send your require identifying the part number and
proposal to: Matt Fuller, Senior Aviation
the following new airworthiness serial number of certain components
Safety Engineer, Safety Management Section,
directive (AD): Rotorcraft Standards Branch, FAA, 10101 installed on the MLG, NLG, and CLG;
Airbus Helicopters: Docket No. FAA–2018– Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177; replacing affected parts; identifying the
0384; Product Identifier 2017–SW–061– telephone (817) 222–5110; email 9-ASW- airplane’s weight variant; and
AD. FTW-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov. determining the applicable life limit for
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:09 May 08, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\09MYP1.SGM 09MYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_21284/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-05-09 03:18:10
Document Modified: 2018-05-09 03:18:10
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). | |
| Dates | We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 9, 2018. | |
| Contact | Matt Fuller, Senior Aviation Safety Engineer, Safety Management Section, Rotorcraft Standards Branch, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone (817) 222-5110; email [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 21194 | |
| RIN Number | 2120-AA64 | |
| CFR Associated | Air Transportation; Aircraft; Aviation Safety; Incorporation by Reference and Safety |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR