83_FR_22955 83 FR 22859 - National Priorities List

83 FR 22859 - National Priorities List

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 96 (May 17, 2018)

Page Range22859-22865
FR Document2018-10464

The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (``CERCLA'' or ``the Act''), as amended, requires that the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (``NCP'') include a list of national priorities among the known releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants throughout the United States. The National Priorities List (``NPL'') constitutes this list. The NPL is intended primarily to guide the Environmental Protection Agency (``the EPA'' or ``the agency'') in determining which sites warrant further investigation. These further investigations will allow the EPA to assess the nature and extent of public health and environmental risks associated with the site and to determine what CERCLA-financed remedial action(s), if any, may be appropriate. This rule adds six sites to the General Superfund section of the NPL.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 96 (Thursday, May 17, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 96 (Thursday, May 17, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22859-22865]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-10464]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 300

[EPA-HQ-OLEM-2017-0604, 0606, 0607, 0609, 0611 and 0612; FRL-9978-14-
OLEM]


National Priorities List

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 
Liability Act of 1980 (``CERCLA'' or ``the Act''), as amended, requires 
that the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency 
Plan (``NCP'') include a list of national priorities among the known 
releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances, pollutants or 
contaminants throughout the United States. The National Priorities List 
(``NPL'') constitutes this list. The NPL is intended primarily to guide 
the Environmental Protection Agency (``the EPA'' or ``the agency'') in 
determining which sites warrant further investigation. These further 
investigations will allow the EPA to assess the nature and extent of 
public health and environmental risks associated with the site and to 
determine what CERCLA-financed remedial action(s), if any, may be 
appropriate. This rule adds six sites to the General Superfund section 
of the NPL.

DATES: The document is effective on June 18, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Contact information for the EPA Headquarters:
     Docket Coordinator, Headquarters; U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency; CERCLA Docket Office; 1301 Constitution Avenue NW, 
William Jefferson Clinton Building West, Room 3334, Washington, DC 
20004, 202/566-0276.
    The contact information for the regional dockets is as follows:
     Holly Inglis, Region 1 (CT, ME, MA, NH, RI, VT), U.S. EPA, 
Superfund Records and Information Center, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 
100, Boston, MA 02109-3912; 617/918-1413.
     Ildefonso Acosta, Region 2 (NJ, NY, PR, VI), U.S. EPA, 290 
Broadway, New York, NY 10007-1866; 212/637-4344.
     Lorie Baker (ASRC), Region 3 (DE, DC, MD, PA, VA, WV), 
U.S. EPA, Library, 1650 Arch Street, Mailcode 3HS12, Philadelphia, PA 
19103; 215/814-3355.
     Cathy Amoroso, Region 4 (AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, SC, TN), 
U.S. EPA, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Mailcode 9T25, Atlanta, GA 30303; 404/
562-8637.
     Todd Quesada, Region 5 (IL, IN, MI, MN, OH, WI), U.S. EPA 
Superfund Division Librarian/SFD Records Manager SRC-7J, Metcalfe 
Federal Building, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, IL 60604; 312/
886-4465.
     Brenda Cook, Region 6 (AR, LA, NM, OK, TX), U.S. EPA, 1445 
Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Mailcode 6SFTS, Dallas, TX 75202-2733; 214/
665-7436.
     Kumud Pyakuryal, Region 7 (IA, KS, MO, NE), U.S. EPA, 
11201 Renner Blvd., Mailcode SUPRSTAR, Lenexa, KS 66219; 913/551-7956.
     Victor Ketellapper, Region 8 (CO, MT, ND, SD, UT, WY), 
U.S. EPA, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Mailcode 8EPR-B, Denver, CO 80202-1129; 
303/312-6578.
     Sharon Murray, Region 9 (AZ, CA, HI, NV, AS, GU, MP), U.S. 
EPA, 75 Hawthorne Street, Mailcode SFD 6-1, San Francisco, CA 94105; 
415/947-4250.
     Ken Marcy, Region 10 (AK, ID, OR, WA), U.S. EPA, 1200 6th 
Avenue, Mailcode ECL-112, Seattle, WA 98101; 206/463-1349.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terry Jeng, phone: (703) 603-8852, 
email: [email protected] Site Assessment and Remedy Decisions Branch, 
Assessment and Remediation Division, Office of Superfund Remediation 
and Technology Innovation (Mailcode 5204P), U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency; 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460; 
or the Superfund Hotline, phone (800) 424-9346 or (703) 412-9810 in the 
Washington, DC, metropolitan area.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents

I. Background
    A. What are CERCLA and SARA?
    B. What is the NCP?
    C. What is the National Priorities List (NPL)?
    D. How are sites listed on the NPL?
    E. What happens to sites on the NPL?
    F. Does the NPL define the boundaries of sites?
    G. How are sites removed from the NPL?
    H. May the EPA delete portions of sites from the NPL as they are 
cleaned up?
    I. What is the Construction Completion List (CCL)?
    J. What is the Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use measure?
    K. What is state/tribal correspondence concerning NPL Listing?
II. Availability of Information to the Public
    A. May I review the documents relevant to this final rule?
    B. What documents are available for review at the EPA 
Headquarters docket?
    C. What documents are available for review at the EPA regional 
dockets?

[[Page 22860]]

    D. How do I access the documents?
    E. How may I obtain a current list of NPL sites?
III. Contents of This Final Rule
    A. Additions to the NPL
    B. What did the EPA do with the public comments it received?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
    A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and 
Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
    B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulation and Controlling 
Regulatory Costs
    C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
    D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
    E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
    F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
    G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination with 
Indian Tribal Governments
    H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children from 
Environmental Health and Safety Risks
    I. Executive Order 13211: Actions that Significantly Affect 
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
    J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
    K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions to Address 
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income 
Populations
    L. Congressional Review Act

I. Background

A. What are CERCLA and SARA?

    In 1980, Congress enacted the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9601-9675 (``CERCLA'' or 
``the Act''), in response to the dangers of uncontrolled releases or 
threatened releases of hazardous substances, and releases or 
substantial threats of releases into the environment of any pollutant 
or contaminant that may present an imminent or substantial danger to 
the public health or welfare. CERCLA was amended on October 17, 1986, 
by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (``SARA''), Public 
Law 99-499, 100 Stat. 1613 et seq.

B. What is the NCP?

    To implement CERCLA, the EPA promulgated the revised National Oil 
and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (``NCP''), 40 CFR 
part 300, on July 16, 1982 (47 FR 31180), pursuant to CERCLA section 
105 and Executive Order 12316 (46 FR 42237, August 20, 1981). The NCP 
sets guidelines and procedures for responding to releases and 
threatened releases of hazardous substances, or releases or substantial 
threats of releases into the environment of any pollutant or 
contaminant that may present an imminent or substantial danger to the 
public health or welfare. The EPA has revised the NCP on several 
occasions. The most recent comprehensive revision was on March 8, 1990 
(55 FR 8666).
    As required under section 105(a)(8)(A) of CERCLA, the NCP also 
includes ``criteria for determining priorities among releases or 
threatened releases throughout the United States for the purpose of 
taking remedial action and, to the extent practicable, taking into 
account the potential urgency of such action, for the purpose of taking 
removal action.'' ``Removal'' actions are defined broadly and include a 
wide range of actions taken to study, clean up, prevent or otherwise 
address releases and threatened releases of hazardous substances, 
pollutants or contaminants (42 U.S.C. 9601(23)).

C. What is the National Priorities List (NPL)?

    The NPL is a list of national priorities among the known or 
threatened releases of hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants 
throughout the United States. The list, which is appendix B of the NCP 
(40 CFR part 300), was required under section 105(a)(8)(B) of CERCLA, 
as amended. Section 105(a)(8)(B) defines the NPL as a list of 
``releases'' and the highest priority ``facilities'' and requires that 
the NPL be revised at least annually. The NPL is intended primarily to 
guide the EPA in determining which sites warrant further investigation 
to assess the nature and extent of public health and environmental 
risks associated with a release of hazardous substances, pollutants or 
contaminants. The NPL is of only limited significance, however, as it 
does not assign liability to any party or to the owner of any specific 
property. Also, placing a site on the NPL does not mean that any 
remedial or removal action necessarily need be taken.
    For purposes of listing, the NPL includes two sections, one of 
sites that are generally evaluated and cleaned up by the EPA (the 
``General Superfund section'') and one of sites that are owned or 
operated by other federal agencies (the ``Federal Facilities 
section''). With respect to sites in the Federal Facilities section, 
these sites are generally being addressed by other federal agencies. 
Under Executive Order 12580 (52 FR 2923, January 29, 1987) and CERCLA 
section 120, each federal agency is responsible for carrying out most 
response actions at facilities under its own jurisdiction, custody or 
control, although the EPA is responsible for preparing a Hazard Ranking 
System (``HRS'') score and determining whether the facility is placed 
on the NPL.

D. How are sites listed on the NPL?

    There are three mechanisms for placing sites on the NPL for 
possible remedial action (see 40 CFR 300.425(c) of the NCP): (1) A site 
may be included on the NPL if it scores sufficiently high on the HRS, 
which the EPA promulgated as appendix A of the NCP (40 CFR part 300). 
The HRS serves as a screening tool to evaluate the relative potential 
of uncontrolled hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants to 
pose a threat to human health or the environment. On December 14, 1990 
(55 FR 51532), the EPA promulgated revisions to the HRS partly in 
response to CERCLA section 105(c), added by SARA. On January 9, 2017 
(82 FR 2760), a subsurface intrusion component was added to the HRS to 
enable the EPA to consider human exposure to hazardous substances or 
pollutants and contaminants that enter regularly occupied structures 
through subsurface intrusion when evaluating sites for the NPL. The 
current HRS evaluates four pathways: Ground water, surface water, soil 
exposure and subsurface intrusion, and air. As a matter of agency 
policy, those sites that score 28.50 or greater on the HRS are eligible 
for the NPL. (2) Each state may designate a single site as its top 
priority to be listed on the NPL, without any HRS score. This provision 
of CERCLA requires that, to the extent practicable, the NPL include one 
facility designated by each state as the greatest danger to public 
health, welfare or the environment among known facilities in the state. 
This mechanism for listing is set out in the NCP at 40 CFR 
300.425(c)(2). (3) The third mechanism for listing, included in the NCP 
at 40 CFR 300.425(c)(3), allows certain sites to be listed without any 
HRS score, if all of the following conditions are met:
     The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry 
(ATSDR) of the U.S. Public Health Service has issued a health advisory 
that recommends dissociation of individuals from the release.
     The EPA determines that the release poses a significant 
threat to public health.
     The EPA anticipates that it will be more cost-effective to 
use its remedial authority than to use its removal authority to respond 
to the release.
    The EPA promulgated an original NPL of 406 sites on September 8, 
1983 (48 FR 40658) and generally has updated it at least annually.

E. What happens to sites on the NPL?

    A site may undergo remedial action financed by the Trust Fund 
established under CERCLA (commonly referred to

[[Page 22861]]

as the ``Superfund'') only after it is placed on the NPL, as provided 
in the NCP at 40 CFR 300.425(b)(1). (``Remedial actions'' are those 
``consistent with a permanent remedy, taken instead of or in addition 
to removal actions'' (40 CFR 300.5). However, under 40 CFR 
300.425(b)(2), placing a site on the NPL ``does not imply that monies 
will be expended.'' The EPA may pursue other appropriate authorities to 
respond to the releases, including enforcement action under CERCLA and 
other laws.

F. Does the NPL define the boundaries of sites?

    The NPL does not describe releases in precise geographical terms; 
it would be neither feasible nor consistent with the limited purpose of 
the NPL (to identify releases that are priorities for further 
evaluation), for it to do so. Indeed, the precise nature and extent of 
the site are typically not known at the time of listing.
    Although a CERCLA ``facility'' is broadly defined to include any 
area where a hazardous substance has ``come to be located'' (CERCLA 
section 101(9)), the listing process itself is not intended to define 
or reflect the boundaries of such facilities or releases. Of course, 
HRS data (if the HRS is used to list a site) upon which the NPL 
placement was based will, to some extent, describe the release(s) at 
issue. That is, the NPL site would include all releases evaluated as 
part of that HRS analysis.
    When a site is listed, the approach generally used to describe the 
relevant release(s) is to delineate a geographical area (usually the 
area within an installation or plant boundaries) and identify the site 
by reference to that area. However, the NPL site is not necessarily 
coextensive with the boundaries of the installation or plant, and the 
boundaries of the installation or plant are not necessarily the 
``boundaries'' of the site. Rather, the site consists of all 
contaminated areas within the area used to identify the site, as well 
as any other location where that contamination has come to be located, 
or from where that contamination came.
    In other words, while geographic terms are often used to designate 
the site (e.g., the ``Jones Co. Plant site'') in terms of the property 
owned by a particular party, the site, properly understood, is not 
limited to that property (e.g., it may extend beyond the property due 
to contaminant migration), and conversely may not occupy the full 
extent of the property (e.g., where there are uncontaminated parts of 
the identified property, they may not be, strictly speaking, part of 
the ``site''). The ``site'' is thus neither equal to, nor confined by, 
the boundaries of any specific property that may give the site its 
name, and the name itself should not be read to imply that this site is 
coextensive with the entire area within the property boundary of the 
installation or plant. In addition, the site name is merely used to 
help identify the geographic location of the contamination, and is not 
meant to constitute any determination of liability at a site. For 
example, the name ``Jones Co. plant site,'' does not imply that the 
Jones Company is responsible for the contamination located on the plant 
site.
    EPA regulations provide that the remedial investigation (``RI'') 
``is a process undertaken . . . to determine the nature and extent of 
the problem presented by the release'' as more information is developed 
on site contamination, and which is generally performed in an 
interactive fashion with the feasibility study (``FS'') (40 CFR 300.5). 
During the RI/FS process, the release may be found to be larger or 
smaller than was originally thought, as more is learned about the 
source(s) and the migration of the contamination. However, the HRS 
inquiry focuses on an evaluation of the threat posed and therefore the 
boundaries of the release need not be exactly defined. Moreover, it 
generally is impossible to discover the full extent of where the 
contamination ``has come to be located'' before all necessary studies 
and remedial work are completed at a site. Indeed, the known boundaries 
of the contamination can be expected to change over time. Thus, in most 
cases, it may be impossible to describe the boundaries of a release 
with absolute certainty.
    Further, as noted previously, NPL listing does not assign liability 
to any party or to the owner of any specific property. Thus, if a party 
does not believe it is liable for releases on discrete parcels of 
property, it can submit supporting information to the agency at any 
time after it receives notice it is a potentially responsible party.
    For these reasons, the NPL need not be amended as further research 
reveals more information about the location of the contamination or 
release.

G. How are sites removed from the NPL?

    The EPA may delete sites from the NPL where no further response is 
appropriate under Superfund, as explained in the NCP at 40 CFR 
300.425(e). This section also provides that the EPA shall consult with 
states on proposed deletions and shall consider whether any of the 
following criteria have been met:
    (i) Responsible parties or other persons have implemented all 
appropriate response actions required;
    (ii) All appropriate Superfund-financed response has been 
implemented and no further response action is required; or
    (iii) The remedial investigation has shown the release poses no 
significant threat to public health or the environment, and taking of 
remedial measures is not appropriate.

H. May the EPA delete portions of sites from the NPL as they are 
cleaned up?

    In November 1995, the EPA initiated a policy to delete portions of 
NPL sites where cleanup is complete (60 FR 55465, November 1, 1995). 
Total site cleanup may take many years, while portions of the site may 
have been cleaned up and made available for productive use.

I. What is the Construction Completion List (CCL)?

    The EPA also has developed an NPL construction completion list 
(``CCL'') to simplify its system of categorizing sites and to better 
communicate the successful completion of cleanup activities (58 FR 
12142, March 2, 1993). Inclusion of a site on the CCL has no legal 
significance.
    Sites qualify for the CCL when: (1) Any necessary physical 
construction is complete, whether or not final cleanup levels or other 
requirements have been achieved; (2) the EPA has determined that the 
response action should be limited to measures that do not involve 
construction (e.g., institutional controls); or (3) the site qualifies 
for deletion from the NPL. For more information on the CCL, see the 
EPA's internet site at https://www.epa.gov/superfund/construction-completions-national-priorities-list-npl-sites-number.

J. What is the Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use measure?

    The Sitewide Ready for Anticipated Use measure represents important 
Superfund accomplishments and the measure reflects the high priority 
the EPA places on considering anticipated future land use as part of 
the remedy selection process. See Guidance for Implementing the 
Sitewide Ready-for-Reuse Measure, May 24, 2006, OSWER 9365.0-36. This 
measure applies to final and deleted sites where construction is 
complete, all cleanup goals have been achieved, and all institutional 
or other controls are in place. The EPA has been successful on many 
occasions in carrying out remedial actions that ensure protectiveness 
of human health and the environment for current and

[[Page 22862]]

future land uses, in a manner that allows contaminated properties to be 
restored to environmental and economic vitality. For further 
information, please go to https://www.epa.gov/superfund/about-superfund-cleanup-process#tab-9.

K. What is state/tribal correspondence concerning NPL listing?

    In order to maintain close coordination with states and tribes in 
the NPL listing decision process, the EPA's policy is to determine the 
position of the states and tribes regarding sites that the EPA is 
considering for listing. This consultation process is outlined in two 
memoranda that can be found at the following website: https://www.epa.gov/superfund/statetribal-correspondence-concerning-npl-site-listing.
    The EPA has improved the transparency of the process by which state 
and tribal input is solicited. The EPA is using the Web and where 
appropriate more structured state and tribal correspondence that (1) 
explains the concerns at the site and the EPA's rationale for 
proceeding; (2) requests an explanation of how the state intends to 
address the site if placement on the NPL is not favored; and (3) 
emphasizes the transparent nature of the process by informing states 
that information on their responses will be publicly available.
    A model letter and correspondence between the EPA and states and 
tribes where applicable, is available on the EPA's website at http://semspub.epa.gov/src/document/HQ/174024.

II. Availability of Information to the Public

A. May I review the documents relevant to this final rule?

    Yes, documents relating to the evaluation and scoring of the sites 
in this final rule are contained in dockets located both at the EPA 
headquarters and in the EPA regional offices.
    An electronic version of the public docket is available through 
https://www.regulations.gov (see table below for docket identification 
numbers). Although not all docket materials may be available 
electronically, you may still access any of the publicly available 
docket materials through the docket facilities identified in section 
II.D.

                                      Docket Identification Numbers by Site
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Site name                           City/County, State                      Docket ID No.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hockessin Groundwater.................  Hockessin, DE...........................  EPA-HQ-OLEM-2017-0604.
Franklin Street Groundwater             Spencer, IN.............................  EPA-HQ-OLEM-2017-0606.
 Contamination.
Spring Park Municipal Well Field......  Spring Park, MN.........................  EPA-HQ-OLEM-2017-0607.
Burlington Industries Cheraw..........  Cheraw, SC..............................  EPA-HQ-OLEM-2017-0609.
Lane Plating Works, Inc...............  Dallas, TX..............................  EPA-HQ-OLEM-2017-0611.
River City Metal Finishing............  San Antonio, TX.........................  EPA-HQ-OLEM-2017-0612.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. What documents are available for review at the EPA Headquarters 
docket?

    The headquarters docket for this rule contains the HRS score 
sheets, the documentation record describing the information used to 
compute the score and a list of documents referenced in the 
documentation record for each site.

C. What documents are available for review at the EPA regional dockets?

    The EPA regional dockets contain all the information in the 
headquarters docket, plus the actual reference documents containing the 
data principally relied upon by the EPA in calculating or evaluating 
the HRS score. These reference documents are available only in the 
regional dockets.

D. How do I access the documents?

    You may view the documents, by appointment only, after the 
publication of this rule. The hours of operation for the headquarters 
docket are from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
excluding federal holidays. Please contact the regional dockets for 
hours. For addresses for the headquarters and regional dockets, see 
Addresses section in the beginning portion of this preamble.

E. How may I obtain a current list of NPL sites?

    You may obtain a current list of NPL sites via the internet at 
https://www.epa.gov/superfund/national-priorities-list-npl-sites-site-name or by contacting the Superfund docket (see contact information in 
the beginning portion of this document).

III. Contents of This Final Rule

A. Additions to the NPL

    This final rule adds the following six sites to the General 
Superfund section of the NPL. These sites are being added to the NPL 
based on HRS score.
    General Superfund section:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
             State                     Site name           City/County
------------------------------------------------------------------------
DE............................  Hockessin Groundwater.  Hockessin.
IN............................  Franklin Street         Spencer.
                                 Groundwater
                                 Contamination.
MN............................  Spring Park Municipal   Spring Park.
                                 Well Field.
SC............................  Burlington Industries   Cheraw.
                                 Cheraw.
TX............................  Lane Plating Works,     Dallas.
                                 Inc.
TX............................  River City Metal        San Antonio.
                                 Finishing.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. What did the EPA do with the public comments it received?

    The EPA reviewed all comments received on the sites in this rule 
and responded to all relevant comments. The EPA is adding six sites to 
the NPL in this final rule. All six sites were proposed for NPL 
addition on January 18, 2018 (83 FR 2576). The sites are: Hockessin 
Groundwater in Hockessin, DE; Franklin Street Groundwater Contamination 
in Spencer, IN; Spring Park Municipal Well Field in Spring Park, MN; 
Burlington Industries Cheraw in Cheraw, SC; Lane Plating Works, Inc. in 
Dallas, TX; and, River City Metal Finishing in San Antonio, TX.

[[Page 22863]]

    Comments on the Franklin Street Groundwater Contamination site are 
being addressed in a response to comment support document available in 
the public docket concurrently with this rule.
    For the Hockessin Groundwater site, the EPA received several 
comments supporting NPL listing, several comments unrelated to NPL 
listing and two anonymous comments questioning site investigation and 
interim mitigation measures, timing of cleanup actions and potential 
remedies. In response, EPA is adding the site to the NPL as the best 
way to ensure that cleanup proceeds in a timely manner. NPL listing 
makes a site eligible for remedial action funding under CERCLA. The 
site will be further investigated during the remedial investigation/
feasibility study (RI/FS) phase of the Superfund process to determine 
what response, if any, is appropriate to ensure protection of public 
health and the environment.
    The EPA received no comments on the Spring Park Muncipal Well Field 
site.
    The EPA received one comment from a community member regarding the 
Burlington Industries Cheraw site. The commenter expressed their 
opposition to NPL listing based on concerns that listing may negatively 
affect their property value. Economic factors such as those raised by 
the commenter are generally not considered in the assessment of whether 
a site belongs on the NPL. The EPA notes that there are both costs and 
benefits that can be associated with listing a site. Among the benefits 
are increased health and environmental protection as a result of 
increased public awareness of potential hazards. In addition to the 
potential for federally financed remedial actions, the addition of a 
site to the NPL could accelerate privately financed, voluntary cleanup 
efforts. Listing sites as national priority targets also may give 
states increased support for funding responses at particular sites. As 
a result of the additional CERCLA remedies, there will be lower human 
exposure to high-risk chemicals, and higher quality surface water, 
ground water, soil, and air. Therefore, it is possible that any 
perceived or actual negative fluctuations in property values or 
development opportunities that may result from contamination may also 
be countered by positive fluctuations when a CERCLA investigation and 
any necessary cleanup are completed.
    For the Lane Plating Works, Inc. site, the EPA received only one 
comment related to NPL listing. The comment, submitted by the city of 
Dallas' Office of Environmental Quality, supports NPL listing in order 
to facilitate federal funding for full and complete remediation.
    The EPA received two comments supporting the NPL listing of the 
River City Metal Finishing site, one from a community member and one 
from a student.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders 
can be found at https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive 
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

    This action is not a significant regulatory action and was 
therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
for review.

B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulation and Controlling 
Regulatory Costs

    This action is not an Executive Order 13771 regulatory action 
because this action is not significant under Executive Order 12866.

C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

    This action does not impose an information collection burden under 
the PRA. This rule does not contain any information collection 
requirements that require approval of the OMB.

D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    I certify that this action will not have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This 
action will not impose any requirements on small entities. This rule 
listing sites on the NPL does not impose any obligations on any group, 
including small entities. This rule also does not establish standards 
or requirements that any small entity must meet, and imposes no direct 
costs on any small entity. Whether an entity, small or otherwise, is 
liable for response costs for a release of hazardous substances depends 
on whether that entity is liable under CERCLA 107(a). Any such 
liability exists regardless of whether the site is listed on the NPL 
through this rulemaking.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)

    This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in 
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect 
small governments. This action imposes no enforceable duty on any 
state, local or tribal governments or the private sector. Listing a 
site on the NPL does not itself impose any costs. Listing does not mean 
that the EPA necessarily will undertake remedial action. Nor does 
listing require any action by a private party, state, local or tribal 
governments or determine liability for response costs. Costs that arise 
out of site responses result from future site-specific decisions 
regarding what actions to take, not directly from the act of placing a 
site on the NPL.

F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This final rule does not have federalism implications. It will not 
have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship 
between the national government and the states, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian 
Tribal Governments

    This action does not have tribal implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13175. Listing a site on the NPL does not impose any 
costs on a tribe or require a tribe to take remedial action. Thus, 
Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action.

H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental 
Health and Safety Risks

    The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those 
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks 
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect 
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in 
section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to 
Executive Order 13045 because this action itself is procedural in 
nature (adds sites to a list) and does not, in and of itself, provide 
protection from environmental health and safety risks. Separate future 
regulatory actions are required for mitigation of environmental health 
and safety risks.

I. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy 
Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is 
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.

J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)

    This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.

[[Page 22864]]

K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental 
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

    The EPA believes the human health or environmental risk addressed 
by this action will not have potential disproportionately high and 
adverse human health or environmental effects on minority, low-income 
or indigenous populations because it does not affect the level of 
protection provided to human health or the environment. As discussed in 
Section I.C. of the preamble to this action, the NPL is a list of 
national priorities. The NPL is intended primarily to guide the EPA in 
determining which sites warrant further investigation to assess the 
nature and extent of public health and environmental risks associated 
with a release of hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants. The 
NPL is of only limited significance as it does not assign liability to 
any party. Also, placing a site on the NPL does not mean that any 
remedial or removal action necessarily need be taken.

L. Congressional Review Act

    This action is subject to the CRA, and the EPA will submit a rule 
report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of 
the United States. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 
U.S.C. 804(2).
    Provisions of the Congressional Review Act (CRA) or section 305 of 
CERCLA may alter the effective date of this regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 
801(b)(1), a rule shall not take effect, or continue in effect, if 
Congress enacts (and the President signs) a joint resolution of 
disapproval, described under section 802. Another statutory provision 
that may affect this rule is CERCLA section 305, which provides for a 
legislative veto of regulations promulgated under CERCLA. Although INS 
v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919,103 S. Ct. 2764 (1983), and Bd. of Regents of 
the University of Washington v. EPA, 86 F.3d 1214,1222 (D.C. Cir. 
1996), cast the validity of the legislative veto into question, the EPA 
has transmitted a copy of this regulation to the Secretary of the 
Senate and the Clerk of the House of Representatives.
    If action by Congress under either the CRA or CERCLA section 305 
calls the effective date of this regulation into question, the EPA will 
publish a document of clarification in the Federal Register.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Chemicals, 
Hazardous substances, Hazardous waste, Intergovernmental relations, 
Natural resources, Oil pollution, Penalties, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Superfund, Water pollution control, Water 
supply.

    Dated: May 9, 2018.
Barry N. Breen,
Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Land and Emergency 
Management.

    40 CFR part 300 is amended as follows:

PART 300--NATIONAL OIL AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES POLLUTION 
CONTINGENCY PLAN

0
1. The authority citation for part 300 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1321(d); 42 U.S.C. 9601-9657; E.O. 13626, 
77 FR 56749, 3CFR, 2013 Comp., p. 306; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 
CFR, 1991 Comp., p.351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., 
p.193.

0
2. Table 1 of appendix B to part 300 is amended by adding entries for 
``Hockessin Groundwater'', ``Franklin Street Groundwater 
Contamination'', ``Spring Park Municipal Well Field'', ``Burlington 
Industries Cheraw'', ``Lane Plating Works, Inc.'', and ``River City 
Metal Finishing'' in alphabetical order by state to read as follows:

Appendix B to Part 300--National Priorities List

                                       Table 1--General Superfund Section
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               State                        Site name             City/County                 Notes (a)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
DE.................................  Hockessin Groundwater.  Hockessin............  ............................
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
IN.................................  Franklin Street         Spencer..............  ............................
                                      Groundwater
                                      Contamination.
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
MN.................................  Spring Park Municipal   Spring Park..........  ............................
                                      Well Field.
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
SC.................................  Burlington Industries   Cheraw...............  ............................
                                      Cheraw.
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
TX.................................  Lane Plating Works,     Dallas...............  ............................
                                      Inc.
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
TX.................................  River City Metal        San Antonio..........  ............................
                                      Finishing.
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\(a)\A = Based on issuance of health advisory by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (if scored,
  HRS score need not be greater than or equal to 28.50).


[[Page 22865]]

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2018-10464 Filed 5-16-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P



                                                                 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 96 / Thursday, May 17, 2018 / Rules and Regulations                                                22859

                                           VII. Congressional Review Act                                 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION                              Forsyth Street SW, Mailcode 9T25,
                                                                                                         AGENCY                                                Atlanta, GA 30303; 404/562–8637.
                                             Pursuant to the Congressional Review                                                                                • Todd Quesada, Region 5 (IL, IN, MI,
                                           Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will                          40 CFR Part 300                                       MN, OH, WI), U.S. EPA Superfund
                                           submit a report containing this rule and                                                                            Division Librarian/SFD Records
                                                                                                         [EPA–HQ–OLEM–2017–0604, 0606, 0607,
                                           other required information to the U.S.                        0609, 0611 and 0612; FRL–9978–14–OLEM]                Manager SRC–7J, Metcalfe Federal
                                           Senate, the U.S. House of                                                                                           Building, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
                                           Representatives, and the Comptroller                          National Priorities List                              Chicago, IL 60604; 312/886–4465.
                                           General of the United States prior to                                                                                 • Brenda Cook, Region 6 (AR, LA,
                                           publication of the rule in the Federal                        AGENCY:  Environmental Protection                     NM, OK, TX), U.S. EPA, 1445 Ross
                                           Register. This action is not a ‘‘major                        Agency (EPA).                                         Avenue, Suite 1200, Mailcode 6SFTS,
                                           rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).                         ACTION: Final rule.                                   Dallas, TX 75202–2733; 214/665–7436.
                                                                                                                                                                 • Kumud Pyakuryal, Region 7 (IA,
                                           List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180                           SUMMARY:   The Comprehensive                          KS, MO, NE), U.S. EPA, 11201 Renner
                                                                                                         Environmental Response,                               Blvd., Mailcode SUPRSTAR, Lenexa, KS
                                             Environmental protection,                                   Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980               66219; 913/551–7956.
                                           Administrative practice and procedure,                        (‘‘CERCLA’’ or ‘‘the Act’’), as amended,                • Victor Ketellapper, Region 8 (CO,
                                           Agricultural commodities, Pesticides                          requires that the National Oil and                    MT, ND, SD, UT, WY), U.S. EPA, 1595
                                           and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping                        Hazardous Substances Pollution                        Wynkoop Street, Mailcode 8EPR–B,
                                           requirements.                                                 Contingency Plan (‘‘NCP’’) include a list             Denver, CO 80202–1129; 303/312–6578.
                                              Dated: May 8, 2018.                                        of national priorities among the known                  • Sharon Murray, Region 9 (AZ, CA,
                                                                                                         releases or threatened releases of                    HI, NV, AS, GU, MP), U.S. EPA, 75
                                           Daniel Rosenblatt,
                                                                                                         hazardous substances, pollutants or                   Hawthorne Street, Mailcode SFD 6–1,
                                           Acting Director, Registration Division, Office                contaminants throughout the United                    San Francisco, CA 94105; 415/947–
                                           of Pesticide Programs.                                        States. The National Priorities List                  4250.
                                             Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is                              (‘‘NPL’’) constitutes this list. The NPL is             • Ken Marcy, Region 10 (AK, ID, OR,
                                                                                                         intended primarily to guide the                       WA), U.S. EPA, 1200 6th Avenue,
                                           amended as follows:
                                                                                                         Environmental Protection Agency (‘‘the                Mailcode ECL–112, Seattle, WA 98101;
                                           PART 180—[AMENDED]                                            EPA’’ or ‘‘the agency’’) in determining               206/463–1349.
                                                                                                         which sites warrant further                           FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                           ■ 1. The authority citation for part 180                      investigation. These further                          Terry Jeng, phone: (703) 603–8852,
                                           continues to read as follows:                                 investigations will allow the EPA to                  email: jeng.terry@epa.gov Site
                                                                                                         assess the nature and extent of public                Assessment and Remedy Decisions
                                               Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.                health and environmental risks                        Branch, Assessment and Remediation
                                           ■  2. In § 180.659, add alphabetically                        associated with the site and to                       Division, Office of Superfund
                                           ‘‘Potato, granules/flakes’’, ‘‘Vegetable,                     determine what CERCLA-financed                        Remediation and Technology
                                           bulb, group 3–07’’, and ‘‘Vegetable,                          remedial action(s), if any, may be                    Innovation (Mailcode 5204P), U.S.
                                           tuberous and corm, subgroup 1C’’ to the                       appropriate. This rule adds six sites to              Environmental Protection Agency; 1200
                                                                                                         the General Superfund section of the                  Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington,
                                           table in paragraph (a)(5) to read as
                                                                                                         NPL.                                                  DC 20460; or the Superfund Hotline,
                                           follows:
                                                                                                         DATES:  The document is effective on                  phone (800) 424–9346 or (703) 412–
                                           § 180.659 Pyroxasulfone; tolerances for                       June 18, 2018.                                        9810 in the Washington, DC,
                                           residues.                                                                                                           metropolitan area.
                                                                                                         ADDRESSES: Contact information for the
                                                                                                                                                               SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                               (a) * * *                                                 EPA Headquarters:
                                               (5) * * *                                                    • Docket Coordinator, Headquarters;                Table of Contents
                                                                                                         U.S. Environmental Protection Agency;                 I. Background
                                                                                       Parts per         CERCLA Docket Office; 1301                               A. What are CERCLA and SARA?
                                                        Commodity                                        Constitution Avenue NW, William
                                                                                        million                                                                   B. What is the NCP?
                                                                                                         Jefferson Clinton Building West, Room                    C. What is the National Priorities List
                                                                                                         3334, Washington, DC 20004, 202/566–                        (NPL)?
                                              *         *         *              *              *        0276.                                                    D. How are sites listed on the NPL?
                                           Potato, granules/flakes ...............              0.20        The contact information for the                       E. What happens to sites on the NPL?
                                                                                                         regional dockets is as follows:                          F. Does the NPL define the boundaries of
                                                                                                                                                                     sites?
                                             *         *         *          *                   *           • Holly Inglis, Region 1 (CT, ME, MA,
                                           Vegetable, bulb, group 3–07 ......                   0.15                                                              G. How are sites removed from the NPL?
                                                                                                         NH, RI, VT), U.S. EPA, Superfund                         H. May the EPA delete portions of sites
                                                                                                         Records and Information Center, 5 Post                      from the NPL as they are cleaned up?
                                              *         *          *               *            *        Office Square, Suite 100, Boston, MA                     I. What is the Construction Completion List
                                           Vegetable, tuberous and corm,                                 02109–3912; 617/918–1413.                                   (CCL)?
                                             subgroup 1C ...........................            0.08        • Ildefonso Acosta, Region 2 (NJ, NY,                 J. What is the Sitewide Ready for
                                                                                                         PR, VI), U.S. EPA, 290 Broadway, New                        Anticipated Use measure?
                                           *      *       *       *      *                               York, NY 10007–1866; 212/637–4344.                       K. What is state/tribal correspondence
                                           [FR Doc. 2018–10582 Filed 5–16–18; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                            • Lorie Baker (ASRC), Region 3 (DE,                      concerning NPL Listing?
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES




                                           BILLING CODE 6560–50–P                                        DC, MD, PA, VA, WV), U.S. EPA,                        II. Availability of Information to the Public
                                                                                                                                                                  A. May I review the documents relevant to
                                                                                                         Library, 1650 Arch Street, Mailcode                         this final rule?
                                                                                                         3HS12, Philadelphia, PA 19103; 215/                      B. What documents are available for review
                                                                                                         814–3355.                                                   at the EPA Headquarters docket?
                                                                                                            • Cathy Amoroso, Region 4 (AL, FL,                    C. What documents are available for review
                                                                                                         GA, KY, MS, NC, SC, TN), U.S. EPA, 61                       at the EPA regional dockets?



                                      VerDate Sep<11>2014     16:58 May 16, 2018   Jkt 244001       PO 00000   Frm 00029   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\17MYR1.SGM   17MYR1


                                           22860               Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 96 / Thursday, May 17, 2018 / Rules and Regulations

                                              D. How do I access the documents?                    public health or welfare. The EPA has                 D. How are sites listed on the NPL?
                                              E. How may I obtain a current list of NPL            revised the NCP on several occasions.
                                                 sites?                                                                                                     There are three mechanisms for
                                                                                                   The most recent comprehensive revision                placing sites on the NPL for possible
                                           III. Contents of This Final Rule
                                                                                                   was on March 8, 1990 (55 FR 8666).                    remedial action (see 40 CFR 300.425(c)
                                              A. Additions to the NPL
                                              B. What did the EPA do with the public                 As required under section                           of the NCP): (1) A site may be included
                                                 comments it received?                             105(a)(8)(A) of CERCLA, the NCP also                  on the NPL if it scores sufficiently high
                                           IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews               includes ‘‘criteria for determining                   on the HRS, which the EPA
                                              A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory                 priorities among releases or threatened               promulgated as appendix A of the NCP
                                                 Planning and Review and Executive                 releases throughout the United States
                                                 Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
                                                                                                                                                         (40 CFR part 300). The HRS serves as a
                                                                                                   for the purpose of taking remedial                    screening tool to evaluate the relative
                                                 Regulatory Review
                                                                                                   action and, to the extent practicable,                potential of uncontrolled hazardous
                                              B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing
                                                 Regulation and Controlling Regulatory             taking into account the potential                     substances, pollutants or contaminants
                                                 Costs                                             urgency of such action, for the purpose               to pose a threat to human health or the
                                              C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)                     of taking removal action.’’ ‘‘Removal’’               environment. On December 14, 1990 (55
                                              D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)                  actions are defined broadly and include               FR 51532), the EPA promulgated
                                              E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act                      a wide range of actions taken to study,               revisions to the HRS partly in response
                                                 (UMRA)                                            clean up, prevent or otherwise address
                                              F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
                                                                                                                                                         to CERCLA section 105(c), added by
                                                                                                   releases and threatened releases of                   SARA. On January 9, 2017 (82 FR 2760),
                                              G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
                                                                                                   hazardous substances, pollutants or                   a subsurface intrusion component was
                                                 and Coordination with Indian Tribal
                                                 Governments                                       contaminants (42 U.S.C. 9601(23)).                    added to the HRS to enable the EPA to
                                              H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of              C. What is the National Priorities List               consider human exposure to hazardous
                                                 Children from Environmental Health and            (NPL)?                                                substances or pollutants and
                                                 Safety Risks                                                                                            contaminants that enter regularly
                                              I. Executive Order 13211: Actions that                  The NPL is a list of national priorities           occupied structures through subsurface
                                                 Significantly Affect Energy Supply,               among the known or threatened releases
                                                 Distribution, or Use
                                                                                                                                                         intrusion when evaluating sites for the
                                                                                                   of hazardous substances, pollutants or                NPL. The current HRS evaluates four
                                              J. National Technology Transfer and                  contaminants throughout the United
                                                 Advancement Act (NTTAA)                                                                                 pathways: Ground water, surface water,
                                              K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions            States. The list, which is appendix B of              soil exposure and subsurface intrusion,
                                                 to Address Environmental Justice in               the NCP (40 CFR part 300), was required               and air. As a matter of agency policy,
                                                 Minority Populations and Low-Income               under section 105(a)(8)(B) of CERCLA,                 those sites that score 28.50 or greater on
                                                 Populations                                       as amended. Section 105(a)(8)(B)                      the HRS are eligible for the NPL. (2)
                                              L. Congressional Review Act                          defines the NPL as a list of ‘‘releases’’             Each state may designate a single site as
                                                                                                   and the highest priority ‘‘facilities’’ and           its top priority to be listed on the NPL,
                                           I. Background
                                                                                                   requires that the NPL be revised at least             without any HRS score. This provision
                                           A. What are CERCLA and SARA?                            annually. The NPL is intended                         of CERCLA requires that, to the extent
                                              In 1980, Congress enacted the                        primarily to guide the EPA in                         practicable, the NPL include one facility
                                           Comprehensive Environmental                             determining which sites warrant further               designated by each state as the greatest
                                           Response, Compensation, and Liability                   investigation to assess the nature and                danger to public health, welfare or the
                                           Act, 42 U.S.C. 9601–9675 (‘‘CERCLA’’ or                 extent of public health and                           environment among known facilities in
                                           ‘‘the Act’’), in response to the dangers of             environmental risks associated with a                 the state. This mechanism for listing is
                                           uncontrolled releases or threatened                     release of hazardous substances,                      set out in the NCP at 40 CFR
                                           releases of hazardous substances, and                   pollutants or contaminants. The NPL is                300.425(c)(2). (3) The third mechanism
                                           releases or substantial threats of releases             of only limited significance, however, as             for listing, included in the NCP at 40
                                           into the environment of any pollutant or                it does not assign liability to any party             CFR 300.425(c)(3), allows certain sites
                                           contaminant that may present an                         or to the owner of any specific property.             to be listed without any HRS score, if all
                                           imminent or substantial danger to the                   Also, placing a site on the NPL does not              of the following conditions are met:
                                           public health or welfare. CERCLA was                    mean that any remedial or removal                        • The Agency for Toxic Substances
                                           amended on October 17, 1986, by the                     action necessarily need be taken.                     and Disease Registry (ATSDR) of the
                                           Superfund Amendments and                                   For purposes of listing, the NPL                   U.S. Public Health Service has issued a
                                           Reauthorization Act (‘‘SARA’’), Public                  includes two sections, one of sites that              health advisory that recommends
                                           Law 99–499, 100 Stat. 1613 et seq.                      are generally evaluated and cleaned up                dissociation of individuals from the
                                                                                                   by the EPA (the ‘‘General Superfund                   release.
                                           B. What is the NCP?                                     section’’) and one of sites that are                     • The EPA determines that the release
                                             To implement CERCLA, the EPA                          owned or operated by other federal                    poses a significant threat to public
                                           promulgated the revised National Oil                    agencies (the ‘‘Federal Facilities                    health.
                                           and Hazardous Substances Pollution                      section’’). With respect to sites in the                 • The EPA anticipates that it will be
                                           Contingency Plan (‘‘NCP’’), 40 CFR part                 Federal Facilities section, these sites are           more cost-effective to use its remedial
                                           300, on July 16, 1982 (47 FR 31180),                    generally being addressed by other                    authority than to use its removal
                                           pursuant to CERCLA section 105 and                      federal agencies. Under Executive Order               authority to respond to the release.
                                           Executive Order 12316 (46 FR 42237,                     12580 (52 FR 2923, January 29, 1987)                     The EPA promulgated an original NPL
                                           August 20, 1981). The NCP sets                          and CERCLA section 120, each federal                  of 406 sites on September 8, 1983 (48 FR
                                           guidelines and procedures for                           agency is responsible for carrying out                40658) and generally has updated it at
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES




                                           responding to releases and threatened                   most response actions at facilities under             least annually.
                                           releases of hazardous substances, or                    its own jurisdiction, custody or control,
                                           releases or substantial threats of releases             although the EPA is responsible for                   E. What happens to sites on the NPL?
                                           into the environment of any pollutant or                preparing a Hazard Ranking System                        A site may undergo remedial action
                                           contaminant that may present an                         (‘‘HRS’’) score and determining whether               financed by the Trust Fund established
                                           imminent or substantial danger to the                   the facility is placed on the NPL.                    under CERCLA (commonly referred to


                                      VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:58 May 16, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00030   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\17MYR1.SGM   17MYR1


                                                               Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 96 / Thursday, May 17, 2018 / Rules and Regulations                                         22861

                                           as the ‘‘Superfund’’) only after it is                  is thus neither equal to, nor confined by,               (i) Responsible parties or other
                                           placed on the NPL, as provided in the                   the boundaries of any specific property               persons have implemented all
                                           NCP at 40 CFR 300.425(b)(1).                            that may give the site its name, and the              appropriate response actions required;
                                           (‘‘Remedial actions’’ are those                         name itself should not be read to imply                  (ii) All appropriate Superfund-
                                           ‘‘consistent with a permanent remedy,                   that this site is coextensive with the                financed response has been
                                           taken instead of or in addition to                      entire area within the property                       implemented and no further response
                                           removal actions’’ (40 CFR 300.5).                       boundary of the installation or plant. In             action is required; or
                                           However, under 40 CFR 300.425(b)(2),                    addition, the site name is merely used                   (iii) The remedial investigation has
                                           placing a site on the NPL ‘‘does not                    to help identify the geographic location              shown the release poses no significant
                                           imply that monies will be expended.’’                   of the contamination, and is not meant                threat to public health or the
                                           The EPA may pursue other appropriate                    to constitute any determination of                    environment, and taking of remedial
                                           authorities to respond to the releases,                 liability at a site. For example, the name            measures is not appropriate.
                                           including enforcement action under                      ‘‘Jones Co. plant site,’’ does not imply              H. May the EPA delete portions of sites
                                           CERCLA and other laws.                                  that the Jones Company is responsible
                                                                                                                                                         from the NPL as they are cleaned up?
                                                                                                   for the contamination located on the
                                           F. Does the NPL define the boundaries                                                                            In November 1995, the EPA initiated
                                                                                                   plant site.
                                           of sites?                                                  EPA regulations provide that the                   a policy to delete portions of NPL sites
                                              The NPL does not describe releases in                remedial investigation (‘‘RI’’) ‘‘is a                where cleanup is complete (60 FR
                                           precise geographical terms; it would be                 process undertaken . . . to determine                 55465, November 1, 1995). Total site
                                           neither feasible nor consistent with the                the nature and extent of the problem                  cleanup may take many years, while
                                           limited purpose of the NPL (to identify                 presented by the release’’ as more                    portions of the site may have been
                                           releases that are priorities for further                information is developed on site                      cleaned up and made available for
                                           evaluation), for it to do so. Indeed, the               contamination, and which is generally                 productive use.
                                           precise nature and extent of the site are               performed in an interactive fashion with              I. What is the Construction Completion
                                           typically not known at the time of                      the feasibility study (‘‘FS’’) (40 CFR
                                           listing.                                                                                                      List (CCL)?
                                                                                                   300.5). During the RI/FS process, the
                                              Although a CERCLA ‘‘facility’’ is                    release may be found to be larger or                     The EPA also has developed an NPL
                                           broadly defined to include any area                     smaller than was originally thought, as               construction completion list (‘‘CCL’’) to
                                           where a hazardous substance has ‘‘come                  more is learned about the source(s) and               simplify its system of categorizing sites
                                           to be located’’ (CERCLA section 101(9)),                the migration of the contamination.                   and to better communicate the
                                           the listing process itself is not intended              However, the HRS inquiry focuses on an                successful completion of cleanup
                                           to define or reflect the boundaries of                  evaluation of the threat posed and                    activities (58 FR 12142, March 2, 1993).
                                           such facilities or releases. Of course,                 therefore the boundaries of the release               Inclusion of a site on the CCL has no
                                           HRS data (if the HRS is used to list a                  need not be exactly defined. Moreover,                legal significance.
                                           site) upon which the NPL placement                      it generally is impossible to discover the               Sites qualify for the CCL when: (1)
                                           was based will, to some extent, describe                full extent of where the contamination                Any necessary physical construction is
                                           the release(s) at issue. That is, the NPL               ‘‘has come to be located’’ before all                 complete, whether or not final cleanup
                                           site would include all releases evaluated               necessary studies and remedial work are               levels or other requirements have been
                                           as part of that HRS analysis.                           completed at a site. Indeed, the known                achieved; (2) the EPA has determined
                                              When a site is listed, the approach                  boundaries of the contamination can be                that the response action should be
                                           generally used to describe the relevant                 expected to change over time. Thus, in                limited to measures that do not involve
                                           release(s) is to delineate a geographical               most cases, it may be impossible to                   construction (e.g., institutional
                                           area (usually the area within an                        describe the boundaries of a release                  controls); or (3) the site qualifies for
                                           installation or plant boundaries) and                   with absolute certainty.                              deletion from the NPL. For more
                                           identify the site by reference to that                     Further, as noted previously, NPL                  information on the CCL, see the EPA’s
                                           area. However, the NPL site is not                      listing does not assign liability to any              internet site at https://www.epa.gov/
                                           necessarily coextensive with the                        party or to the owner of any specific                 superfund/construction-completions-
                                           boundaries of the installation or plant,                property. Thus, if a party does not                   national-priorities-list-npl-sites-number.
                                           and the boundaries of the installation or               believe it is liable for releases on
                                           plant are not necessarily the                                                                                 J. What is the Sitewide Ready for
                                                                                                   discrete parcels of property, it can                  Anticipated Use measure?
                                           ‘‘boundaries’’ of the site. Rather, the site            submit supporting information to the
                                           consists of all contaminated areas                      agency at any time after it receives                     The Sitewide Ready for Anticipated
                                           within the area used to identify the site,              notice it is a potentially responsible                Use measure represents important
                                           as well as any other location where that                party.                                                Superfund accomplishments and the
                                           contamination has come to be located,                      For these reasons, the NPL need not                measure reflects the high priority the
                                           or from where that contamination came.                  be amended as further research reveals                EPA places on considering anticipated
                                              In other words, while geographic                     more information about the location of                future land use as part of the remedy
                                           terms are often used to designate the site              the contamination or release.                         selection process. See Guidance for
                                           (e.g., the ‘‘Jones Co. Plant site’’) in terms                                                                 Implementing the Sitewide Ready-for-
                                           of the property owned by a particular                   G. How are sites removed from the NPL?                Reuse Measure, May 24, 2006, OSWER
                                           party, the site, properly understood, is                  The EPA may delete sites from the                   9365.0–36. This measure applies to final
                                           not limited to that property (e.g., it may              NPL where no further response is                      and deleted sites where construction is
                                           extend beyond the property due to                       appropriate under Superfund, as                       complete, all cleanup goals have been
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES




                                           contaminant migration), and conversely                  explained in the NCP at 40 CFR                        achieved, and all institutional or other
                                           may not occupy the full extent of the                   300.425(e). This section also provides                controls are in place. The EPA has been
                                           property (e.g., where there are                         that the EPA shall consult with states on             successful on many occasions in
                                           uncontaminated parts of the identified                  proposed deletions and shall consider                 carrying out remedial actions that
                                           property, they may not be, strictly                     whether any of the following criteria                 ensure protectiveness of human health
                                           speaking, part of the ‘‘site’’). The ‘‘site’’           have been met:                                        and the environment for current and


                                      VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:58 May 16, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00031   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\17MYR1.SGM   17MYR1


                                           22862                     Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 96 / Thursday, May 17, 2018 / Rules and Regulations

                                           future land uses, in a manner that                                        The EPA has improved the                                              II. Availability of Information to the
                                           allows contaminated properties to be                                   transparency of the process by which                                     Public
                                           restored to environmental and economic                                 state and tribal input is solicited. The
                                           vitality. For further information, please                              EPA is using the Web and where                                           A. May I review the documents relevant
                                           go to https://www.epa.gov/superfund/                                   appropriate more structured state and                                    to this final rule?
                                           about-superfund-cleanup-process#tab-9.                                 tribal correspondence that (1) explains                                    Yes, documents relating to the
                                                                                                                  the concerns at the site and the EPA’s
                                           K. What is state/tribal correspondence                                                                                                          evaluation and scoring of the sites in
                                                                                                                  rationale for proceeding; (2) requests an
                                           concerning NPL listing?                                                                                                                         this final rule are contained in dockets
                                                                                                                  explanation of how the state intends to
                                             In order to maintain close                                           address the site if placement on the NPL                                 located both at the EPA headquarters
                                           coordination with states and tribes in                                 is not favored; and (3) emphasizes the                                   and in the EPA regional offices.
                                           the NPL listing decision process, the                                  transparent nature of the process by                                       An electronic version of the public
                                           EPA’s policy is to determine the                                       informing states that information on                                     docket is available through https://
                                           position of the states and tribes                                      their responses will be publicly                                         www.regulations.gov (see table below
                                           regarding sites that the EPA is                                        available.                                                               for docket identification numbers).
                                           considering for listing. This                                             A model letter and correspondence                                     Although not all docket materials may
                                           consultation process is outlined in two                                between the EPA and states and tribes                                    be available electronically, you may still
                                           memoranda that can be found at the                                     where applicable, is available on the                                    access any of the publicly available
                                           following website: https://www.epa.gov/                                EPA’s website at http://                                                 docket materials through the docket
                                           superfund/statetribal-correspondence-                                  semspub.epa.gov/src/document/HQ/                                         facilities identified in section II.D.
                                           concerning-npl-site-listing.                                           174024.

                                                                                                              DOCKET IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS BY SITE
                                                                  Site name                                                             City/County, State                                                           Docket ID No.

                                           Hockessin Groundwater ...........................              Hockessin, DE .......................................................................       EPA–HQ–OLEM–2017–0604.
                                           Franklin Street Groundwater Contamina-                         Spencer, IN ...........................................................................     EPA–HQ–OLEM–2017–0606.
                                             tion.
                                           Spring Park Municipal Well Field .............                 Spring Park, MN ....................................................................        EPA–HQ–OLEM–2017–0607.
                                           Burlington Industries Cheraw ...................               Cheraw, SC ...........................................................................      EPA–HQ–OLEM–2017–0609.
                                           Lane Plating Works, Inc ...........................            Dallas, TX ..............................................................................   EPA–HQ–OLEM–2017–0611.
                                           River City Metal Finishing ........................            San Antonio, TX ....................................................................        EPA–HQ–OLEM–2017–0612.



                                           B. What documents are available for                                    These reference documents are available                                  E. How may I obtain a current list of
                                           review at the EPA Headquarters docket?                                 only in the regional dockets.                                            NPL sites?
                                             The headquarters docket for this rule                                D. How do I access the documents?                                           You may obtain a current list of NPL
                                           contains the HRS score sheets, the                                                                                                              sites via the internet at https://
                                           documentation record describing the                                      You may view the documents, by                                         www.epa.gov/superfund/national-
                                           information used to compute the score                                  appointment only, after the publication                                  priorities-list-npl-sites-site-name or by
                                           and a list of documents referenced in                                  of this rule. The hours of operation for                                 contacting the Superfund docket (see
                                           the documentation record for each site.                                the headquarters docket are from 8:30                                    contact information in the beginning
                                                                                                                  a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through                                        portion of this document).
                                           C. What documents are available for                                    Friday, excluding federal holidays.
                                           review at the EPA regional dockets?                                                                                                             III. Contents of This Final Rule
                                                                                                                  Please contact the regional dockets for
                                             The EPA regional dockets contain all                                 hours. For addresses for the                                             A. Additions to the NPL
                                           the information in the headquarters                                    headquarters and regional dockets, see                                      This final rule adds the following six
                                           docket, plus the actual reference                                      ADDRESSES section in the beginning                                       sites to the General Superfund section of
                                           documents containing the data                                          portion of this preamble.                                                the NPL. These sites are being added to
                                           principally relied upon by the EPA in                                                                                                           the NPL based on HRS score.
                                           calculating or evaluating the HRS score.                                                                                                           General Superfund section:

                                                      State                                                                    Site name                                                                              City/County

                                           DE ...........................    Hockessin Groundwater .........................................................................................          Hockessin.
                                           IN ............................   Franklin Street Groundwater Contamination .........................................................                      Spencer.
                                           MN ..........................     Spring Park Municipal Well Field ...........................................................................             Spring Park.
                                           SC ...........................    Burlington Industries Cheraw .................................................................................           Cheraw.
                                           TX ...........................    Lane Plating Works, Inc .........................................................................................        Dallas.
                                           TX ...........................    River City Metal Finishing ......................................................................................        San Antonio.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES




                                           B. What did the EPA do with the public                                 The EPA is adding six sites to the NPL                                   Contamination in Spencer, IN; Spring
                                           comments it received?                                                  in this final rule. All six sites were                                   Park Municipal Well Field in Spring
                                                                                                                  proposed for NPL addition on January                                     Park, MN; Burlington Industries Cheraw
                                             The EPA reviewed all comments                                        18, 2018 (83 FR 2576). The sites are:                                    in Cheraw, SC; Lane Plating Works, Inc.
                                           received on the sites in this rule and                                 Hockessin Groundwater in Hockessin,                                      in Dallas, TX; and, River City Metal
                                           responded to all relevant comments.                                    DE; Franklin Street Groundwater                                          Finishing in San Antonio, TX.


                                      VerDate Sep<11>2014        16:58 May 16, 2018        Jkt 244001     PO 00000       Frm 00032       Fmt 4700      Sfmt 4700       E:\FR\FM\17MYR1.SGM             17MYR1


                                                               Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 96 / Thursday, May 17, 2018 / Rules and Regulations                                          22863

                                              Comments on the Franklin Street                      listing in order to facilitate federal                tribal governments or the private sector.
                                           Groundwater Contamination site are                      funding for full and complete                         Listing a site on the NPL does not itself
                                           being addressed in a response to                        remediation.                                          impose any costs. Listing does not mean
                                           comment support document available in                      The EPA received two comments                      that the EPA necessarily will undertake
                                           the public docket concurrently with this                supporting the NPL listing of the River               remedial action. Nor does listing require
                                           rule.                                                   City Metal Finishing site, one from a                 any action by a private party, state, local
                                              For the Hockessin Groundwater site,                  community member and one from a                       or tribal governments or determine
                                           the EPA received several comments                       student.                                              liability for response costs. Costs that
                                           supporting NPL listing, several                                                                               arise out of site responses result from
                                           comments unrelated to NPL listing and                   IV. Statutory and Executive Order
                                                                                                                                                         future site-specific decisions regarding
                                           two anonymous comments questioning                      Reviews
                                                                                                                                                         what actions to take, not directly from
                                           site investigation and interim mitigation                 Additional information about these                  the act of placing a site on the NPL.
                                           measures, timing of cleanup actions and                 statutes and Executive Orders can be
                                           potential remedies. In response, EPA is                 found at https://www.epa.gov/laws-                    F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
                                           adding the site to the NPL as the best                  regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.                  This final rule does not have
                                           way to ensure that cleanup proceeds in
                                                                                                   A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory                  federalism implications. It will not have
                                           a timely manner. NPL listing makes a
                                                                                                   Planning and Review and Executive                     substantial direct effects on the states,
                                           site eligible for remedial action funding
                                                                                                   Order 13563: Improving Regulation and                 on the relationship between the national
                                           under CERCLA. The site will be further
                                                                                                   Regulatory Review                                     government and the states, or on the
                                           investigated during the remedial
                                                                                                                                                         distribution of power and
                                           investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS)                   This action is not a significant
                                                                                                                                                         responsibilities among the various
                                           phase of the Superfund process to                       regulatory action and was therefore not
                                                                                                                                                         levels of government.
                                           determine what response, if any, is                     submitted to the Office of Management
                                           appropriate to ensure protection of                     and Budget (OMB) for review.                          G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
                                           public health and the environment.                                                                            and Coordination With Indian Tribal
                                              The EPA received no comments on                      B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing
                                                                                                                                                         Governments
                                           the Spring Park Muncipal Well Field                     Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
                                           site.                                                   Costs                                                   This action does not have tribal
                                              The EPA received one comment from                      This action is not an Executive Order               implications as specified in Executive
                                           a community member regarding the                        13771 regulatory action because this                  Order 13175. Listing a site on the NPL
                                           Burlington Industries Cheraw site. The                  action is not significant under Executive             does not impose any costs on a tribe or
                                           commenter expressed their opposition                    Order 12866.                                          require a tribe to take remedial action.
                                           to NPL listing based on concerns that                                                                         Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
                                           listing may negatively affect their                     C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)                      apply to this action.
                                           property value. Economic factors such                     This action does not impose an
                                           as those raised by the commenter are                                                                          H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
                                                                                                   information collection burden under the
                                           generally not considered in the                                                                               Children From Environmental Health
                                                                                                   PRA. This rule does not contain any
                                           assessment of whether a site belongs on                                                                       and Safety Risks
                                                                                                   information collection requirements that
                                           the NPL. The EPA notes that there are                   require approval of the OMB.                             The EPA interprets Executive Order
                                           both costs and benefits that can be                                                                           13045 as applying only to those
                                           associated with listing a site. Among the               D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
                                                                                                                                                         regulatory actions that concern
                                           benefits are increased health and                          I certify that this action will not have           environmental health or safety risks that
                                           environmental protection as a result of                 a significant economic impact on a                    the EPA has reason to believe may
                                           increased public awareness of potential                 substantial number of small entities                  disproportionately affect children, per
                                           hazards. In addition to the potential for               under the RFA. This action will not                   the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory
                                           federally financed remedial actions, the                impose any requirements on small                      action’’ in section 2–202 of the
                                           addition of a site to the NPL could                     entities. This rule listing sites on the              Executive Order. This action is not
                                           accelerate privately financed, voluntary                NPL does not impose any obligations on                subject to Executive Order 13045
                                           cleanup efforts. Listing sites as national              any group, including small entities. This             because this action itself is procedural
                                           priority targets also may give states                   rule also does not establish standards or             in nature (adds sites to a list) and does
                                           increased support for funding responses                 requirements that any small entity must               not, in and of itself, provide protection
                                           at particular sites. As a result of the                 meet, and imposes no direct costs on                  from environmental health and safety
                                           additional CERCLA remedies, there will                  any small entity. Whether an entity,                  risks. Separate future regulatory actions
                                           be lower human exposure to high-risk                    small or otherwise, is liable for response            are required for mitigation of
                                           chemicals, and higher quality surface                   costs for a release of hazardous                      environmental health and safety risks.
                                           water, ground water, soil, and air.                     substances depends on whether that
                                           Therefore, it is possible that any                      entity is liable under CERCLA 107(a).                 I. Executive Order 13211: Actions That
                                           perceived or actual negative fluctuations               Any such liability exists regardless of               Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
                                           in property values or development                       whether the site is listed on the NPL                 Distribution, or Use
                                           opportunities that may result from                      through this rulemaking.
                                           contamination may also be countered by                                                                          This action is not subject to Executive
                                                                                                   E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act                       Order 13211, because it is not a
                                           positive fluctuations when a CERCLA
                                                                                                   (UMRA)                                                significant regulatory action under
                                           investigation and any necessary cleanup
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES




                                           are completed.                                            This action does not contain any                    Executive Order 12866.
                                              For the Lane Plating Works, Inc. site,               unfunded mandate as described in                      J. National Technology Transfer and
                                           the EPA received only one comment                       UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, and does                    Advancement Act (NTTAA)
                                           related to NPL listing. The comment,                    not significantly or uniquely affect small
                                           submitted by the city of Dallas’ Office of              governments. This action imposes no                     This rulemaking does not involve
                                           Environmental Quality, supports NPL                     enforceable duty on any state, local or               technical standards.


                                      VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:58 May 16, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00033   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\17MYR1.SGM   17MYR1


                                           22864                      Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 96 / Thursday, May 17, 2018 / Rules and Regulations

                                           K. Executive Order 12898: Federal                                 States. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’                           Intergovernmental relations, Natural
                                           Actions To Address Environmental                                  as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).                                        resources, Oil pollution, Penalties,
                                           Justice in Minority Populations and                                 Provisions of the Congressional                                     Reporting and recordkeeping
                                           Low-Income Populations                                            Review Act (CRA) or section 305 of                                    requirements, Superfund, Water
                                                                                                             CERCLA may alter the effective date of                                pollution control, Water supply.
                                             The EPA believes the human health or                            this regulation. Under 5 U.S.C.                                         Dated: May 9, 2018.
                                           environmental risk addressed by this                              801(b)(1), a rule shall not take effect, or
                                           action will not have potential                                                                                                          Barry N. Breen,
                                                                                                             continue in effect, if Congress enacts                                Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of
                                           disproportionately high and adverse                               (and the President signs) a joint
                                           human health or environmental effects                                                                                                   Land and Emergency Management.
                                                                                                             resolution of disapproval, described
                                           on minority, low-income or indigenous                             under section 802. Another statutory                                    40 CFR part 300 is amended as
                                           populations because it does not affect                            provision that may affect this rule is                                follows:
                                           the level of protection provided to                               CERCLA section 305, which provides
                                           human health or the environment. As                               for a legislative veto of regulations                                 PART 300—NATIONAL OIL AND
                                           discussed in Section I.C. of the                                  promulgated under CERCLA. Although                                    HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES
                                           preamble to this action, the NPL is a list                        INS v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919,103 S. Ct.                                POLLUTION CONTINGENCY PLAN
                                           of national priorities. The NPL is                                2764 (1983), and Bd. of Regents of the
                                           intended primarily to guide the EPA in                                                                                                  ■ 1. The authority citation for part 300
                                                                                                             University of Washington v. EPA, 86                                   continues to read as follows:
                                           determining which sites warrant further                           F.3d 1214,1222 (D.C. Cir. 1996), cast the
                                           investigation to assess the nature and                            validity of the legislative veto into                                   Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(d); 42 U.S.C.
                                           extent of public health and                                       question, the EPA has transmitted a                                   9601–9657; E.O. 13626, 77 FR 56749, 3CFR,
                                           environmental risks associated with a                                                                                                   2013 Comp., p. 306; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757,
                                                                                                             copy of this regulation to the Secretary
                                           release of hazardous substances,                                                                                                        3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p.351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR
                                                                                                             of the Senate and the Clerk of the House                              2923, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p.193.
                                           pollutants or contaminants. The NPL is                            of Representatives.
                                           of only limited significance as it does                                                                                                 ■  2. Table 1 of appendix B to part 300
                                                                                                                If action by Congress under either the
                                           not assign liability to any party. Also,                                                                                                is amended by adding entries for
                                                                                                             CRA or CERCLA section 305 calls the
                                           placing a site on the NPL does not mean                                                                                                 ‘‘Hockessin Groundwater’’, ‘‘Franklin
                                                                                                             effective date of this regulation into
                                           that any remedial or removal action                                                                                                     Street Groundwater Contamination’’,
                                                                                                             question, the EPA will publish a
                                           necessarily need be taken.                                                                                                              ‘‘Spring Park Municipal Well Field’’,
                                                                                                             document of clarification in the Federal
                                                                                                                                                                                   ‘‘Burlington Industries Cheraw’’, ‘‘Lane
                                           L. Congressional Review Act                                       Register.
                                                                                                                                                                                   Plating Works, Inc.’’, and ‘‘River City
                                                                                                             List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300                                   Metal Finishing’’ in alphabetical order
                                             This action is subject to the CRA, and
                                                                                                                                                                                   by state to read as follows:
                                           the EPA will submit a rule report to                                Environmental protection, Air
                                           each House of the Congress and to the                             pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous                               Appendix B to Part 300—National
                                           Comptroller General of the United                                 substances, Hazardous waste,                                          Priorities List

                                                                                                           TABLE 1—GENERAL SUPERFUND SECTION
                                                       State                                       Site name                                                  City/County                                                  Notes (a)


                                                       *                            *                    *                               *                            *                              *                                *
                                           DE .............................    Hockessin Groundwater .............................     Hockessin ................................................... ..................................................

                                                        *                            *                 *                                 *                             *                              *                                *
                                           IN ..............................   Franklin Street Groundwater Contamina-                  Spencer ...................................................... ..................................................
                                                                                 tion.

                                                      *                              *                   *                               *                           *                              *                                *
                                           MN ............................     Spring Park Municipal Well Field ...............        Spring Park ................................................ ..................................................

                                                       *                             *                    *                              *                             *                              *                                *
                                           SC .............................    Burlington Industries Cheraw .....................      Cheraw ....................................................... ..................................................

                                                       *                            *                      *                             *                               *                              *                                *
                                           TX .............................    Lane Plating Works, Inc .............................   Dallas ......................................................... ..................................................

                                                       *                             *                     *                             *                          *                              *                                *
                                           TX .............................    River City Metal Finishing ..........................   San Antonio ............................................... ..................................................

                                                         *                            *                         *                          *                               *                              *                               *
                                             (a)A = Based on issuance of health advisory by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (if scored, HRS score need not be greater
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES




                                           than or equal to 28.50).




                                      VerDate Sep<11>2014        16:58 May 16, 2018       Jkt 244001   PO 00000     Frm 00034    Fmt 4700      Sfmt 4700      E:\FR\FM\17MYR1.SGM              17MYR1


                                                               Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 96 / Thursday, May 17, 2018 / Rules and Regulations                                                   22865

                                           *      *     *       *      *                           255, 49 Stat. 543, Aug. 9, 1935), now                 Act (FAST Act) (Pub. L. 114–94, 129
                                           [FR Doc. 2018–10464 Filed 5–16–18; 8:45 am]             appears in 49 U.S.C. chapter 315. The                 Stat. 1312, Dec. 4, 2015).
                                           BILLING CODE 6560–50–P                                  regulations issued under this (and                       The specific regulations amended by
                                                                                                   subsequently enacted) authority became                this rule are based on the statutes
                                                                                                   known as the Federal Motor Carrier                    detailed above. Generally, the legal
                                           DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION                            Safety Regulations (FMCSRs), codified                 authority for each of those provisions
                                                                                                   at 49 CFR parts 350–399. The                          was explained when the requirement
                                           Federal Motor Carrier Safety                            administrative powers to enforce                      was originally adopted and is noted at
                                           Administration                                          chapter 315 (codified in 49 U.S.C.                    the beginning of each part in title 49 of
                                                                                                   chapter 5) were also transferred from the             the CFR.
                                           49 CFR Parts 350, 360, 365, 373, 380,                   ICC to the DOT in 1966 and assigned,                     The Administrative Procedure Act
                                           382, 383, 384, 385, 387, 390, 393, 395,                 first to the Federal Highway                          (APA) (5 U.S.C. 551–706) specifically
                                           396, 397, and 398                                       Administration (FHWA), and then to                    provides exceptions to its notice and
                                                                                                   FMCSA. The FMCSA Administrator has                    comment rulemaking procedures when
                                           RIN 2126–AC06                                                                                                 the Agency finds there is good cause to
                                                                                                   been delegated authority under 49 CFR
                                           General Technical, Organizational,                      1.87 to carry out the motor carrier                   dispense with them, and incorporates
                                           Conforming, and Correcting                              functions vested in the Secretary of                  the finding and a brief statement of
                                           Amendments to the Federal Motor                         Transportation.                                       reasons therefore in the rules issued.
                                                                                                      Between 1984 and 1999, a number of                 Generally, good cause exists when the
                                           Carrier Safety Regulations
                                                                                                   statutes added to FHWA’s authority.                   Agency determines that notice and
                                           AGENCY:  Federal Motor Carrier Safety                   Various statutes authorize the                        public procedures are impractical,
                                           Administration (FMCSA), DOT.                            enforcement of the FMCSRs, the                        unnecessary, or contrary to the public
                                           ACTION: Final rule.                                     Hazardous Materials Regulations                       interest (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B)). The
                                                                                                   (HMRs), and the Commercial                            amendments made in this final rule
                                           SUMMARY:   FMCSA amends its                             Regulations, and provide both civil and               merely correct inadvertent errors and
                                           regulations by making technical                         criminal penalties for violations of these            omissions, remove or update obsolete
                                           corrections throughout the Federal                      requirements. These statutes include the              references, ensure conformity with
                                           Motor Carrier Safety Regulations. The                   Motor Carrier Safety Act of 1984                      Office of the Federal Register style
                                           Agency makes minor changes to correct                   (MCSA) (Pub. L. 98–554, 98 Stat. 2832,                guidelines, and make minor changes to
                                           inadvertent errors and omissions,                       Oct. 30, 1984), codified at 49 U.S.C.                 improve clarity and consistency. The
                                           remove or update obsolete references,                   chapter 311, subchapter III; the                      technical amendments do not impose
                                           ensure conformity with Office of the                    Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Act of                any material new requirements or
                                           Federal Register style guidelines, and                  1986 (Pub. L. 99–570, 100 Stat. 3207–                 increase compliance obligations. For
                                           improve the clarity and consistency of                  170, Oct. 27, 1986), codified at 49 U.S.C.            these reasons, FMCSA finds good cause
                                           certain regulatory provisions.                          chapter 313; the Hazardous Materials                  that notice and public comment on this
                                           DATES: This rule is effective June 18,                  Transportation Uniform Safety Act of                  final rule are unnecessary.
                                           2018.                                                   1990, as amended (Pub. L. 101–615, 104                   The APA also allows agencies to make
                                                                                                   Stat. 3244, Nov. 16, 1990), codified at 49            rules effective immediately with good
                                           FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:    Mr.                 U.S.C. chapter 51; and the ICC                        cause (5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3)), instead of
                                           David Miller, Federal Motor Carrier                     Termination Act of 1995 (ICCTA) (Pub.                 requiring publication 30 days prior to
                                           Safety Administration, Regulatory                       L. 104–88, 109 Stat. 803, Dec. 29, 1995),             the effective date. For the reasons
                                           Development Division, 1200 New Jersey                   codified at 49 U.S.C. chapters 131–149.               already stated, FMCSA finds there is
                                           Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590–                           The Motor Carrier Safety                           good cause for this rule to be effective
                                           0001, by telephone at (202) 366–5370 or                 Improvement Act of 1999 (MCSIA) (Pub.                 immediately.
                                           via email at david.miller@dot.gov. Office               L. 106–159, 113 Stat. 1748, Dec. 9, 1999)                FMCSA is aware of the regulatory
                                           hours are from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                   established FMCSA as a new operating                  requirements concerning public
                                           e.t., Monday through Friday, except                     administration within DOT, effective                  participation in FMCSA rulemaking (49
                                           Federal holidays.                                       January 1, 2000. The motor carrier safety             U.S.C. 31136(g)). These requirements
                                           SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                              responsibilities previously assigned to               pertain to certain major rules,1 but,
                                                                                                   both the ICC and FHWA are now                         because this final rule is not a major
                                           I. Legal Basis for the Rulemaking
                                                                                                   assigned to FMCSA.                                    rule, they are not applicable. In any
                                             Congress delegated certain powers to                     Congress expanded, modified, and                   event, the Agency finds that publication
                                           regulate interstate commerce to the                     amended FMCSA’s authority in the                      of an advance notice of proposed
                                           United States Department of                             Uniting and Strengthening America by                  rulemaking under 49 U.S.C.
                                           Transportation (DOT or Department) in                   Providing Appropriate Tools Required
                                           numerous pieces of legislation, most                    to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism                     1 A ‘‘major rule’’ means any rule that the

                                           notably in section 6 of the Department                  (USA PATRIOT) Act of 2001 (Pub. L.                    Administrator of the Office of Information and
                                           of Transportation Act (DOT Act) (Pub.                   107–56, 115 Stat. 272, Oct. 26, 2001);                Regulatory Affairs of the Office of Management and
                                                                                                                                                         Budget finds has resulted in or is likely to result
                                           L. 89–670, 80 Stat. 931, Oct. 15, 1966).                the Safe, Accountable, Flexible,                      in (a) an annual effect on the economy of $100
                                           Section 6 of the DOT Act transferred to                 Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A                million or more; (b) a major increase in costs or
                                           the Department the authority of the                     Legacy for Users (SAFETEA–LU) (Pub.                   prices for consumers, individual industries,
                                           former Interstate Commerce                              L. 109–59, 119 Stat. 1144, Aug. 10,                   Federal, State, or local government agencies, or
                                                                                                                                                         geographic regions; or (c) significant adverse effects
                                           Commission (ICC) to regulate the                        2005); the SAFETEA–LU Technical
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES




                                                                                                                                                         on competition, employment, investment,
                                           qualifications and maximum hours-of-                    Corrections Act of 2008 (Pub. L. 110–                 productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United
                                           service of employees, the safety of                     244, 122 Stat. 1572, June 6, 2008); the               States-based enterprises to compete with foreign-
                                           operations, and the equipment of motor                  Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st                 based enterprises in domestic and export markets
                                                                                                                                                         5 U.S.C. 804(2)). Exception: The term ‘‘major rule’’
                                           carriers in interstate commerce. This                   Century Act (MAP–21) (Pub. L. 112–                    does not include any rule promulgated under the
                                           authority, first granted to the ICC in the              141, 126 Stat. 405, July 6, 2012); and the            Telecommunications Act of 1996 and the
                                           Motor Carrier Act of 1935 (Pub. L. 74–                  Fixing America’s Surface Transportation               amendments made by that Act.



                                      VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:58 May 16, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00035   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\17MYR1.SGM   17MYR1



Document Created: 2018-05-17 00:51:17
Document Modified: 2018-05-17 00:51:17
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionRules and Regulations
ActionFinal rule.
DatesThe document is effective on June 18, 2018.
ContactTerry Jeng, phone: (703) 603-8852, email: [email protected] Site Assessment and Remedy Decisions Branch, Assessment and Remediation Division, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation (Mailcode 5204P), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460; or the Superfund Hotline, phone (800) 424-9346 or (703) 412-9810 in the Washington, DC, metropolitan area.
FR Citation83 FR 22859 
CFR AssociatedEnvironmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Chemicals; Hazardous Substances; Hazardous Waste; Intergovernmental Relations; Natural Resources; Oil Pollution; Penalties; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Superfund; Water Pollution Control and Water Supply

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR