83 FR 23422 - Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin From India: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 98 (May 21, 2018)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 98 (May 21, 2018)
| Page Range | 23422-23424 | |
| FR Document | 2018-10780 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 98 (Monday, May 21, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 23422-23424] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-10780] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C-533-880] Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin From India: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of polytetrafluoroethylene resin (PTFE resin) from India. The period of investigation is April 1, 2016, through March 31, 2017. DATES: Applicable May 21, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toby Vandall, Emily Halle, or Aimee Phelan, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 1664, (202) 482-0176, or (202) 482-0697, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background This final determination is made in accordance with section 705 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Commerce published the Preliminary Determination of this investigation on March 8, 2018.\1\ For a complete description of the events that followed the publication of the Preliminary Determination, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum issued concurrently with this notice.\2\ A list of topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is included as Appendix II to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin from India: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, 83 FR 9842 (March 8, 2018) (Preliminary Determination) and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. \2\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Final Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation of Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin from India,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Investigation The product covered by this investigation is PTFE resin from India. For a complete description of the scope of this investigation, see Appendix I. Scope Comments In accordance with the Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum,\3\ Commerce provided parties an opportunity to provide comments on all issues regarding product coverage, (i.e., scope). Although certain interested parties commented on the scope of the investigation as it appeared in the Initiation Notice,\4\ we preliminarily made no modifications to the scope of the investigation.\5\ No parties commented on our Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum. As a result, in this final determination, we are adopting the preliminary decision not to modify the scope language. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Memorandum, ``Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin from India and the People's Republic of China: Scope Comments Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Determinations,'' dated February 28, 2018 (Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum). \4\ See Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin from India: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation, 82 FR 49592 (October 26, 2017) (Initiation Notice). \5\ See Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology Commerce conducted this investigation in accordance with section 701 of the Act. For each of the subsidy programs found countervailable, we determine that there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution by an ``authority'' that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The subsidy programs under investigation, and the issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs submitted by the parties, are discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues that parties raised, and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, is attached to this notice at Appendix II. [[Page 23423]] In making these findings, we relied, in part, on facts available and, because the government of India did not act to the best of its ability to respond to our requests for information, we drew an adverse inference where appropriate in selecting from among the facts otherwise available.\7\ For further information, see ``Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse Inferences'' in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Changes Since the Preliminary Determination Based on our review and analysis of the comments received from parties, and minor corrections presented at verification, we made certain changes to the respondent's sales figures and subsidy rate calculations since the Preliminary Determination. For a discussion of these changes, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum and the Final Calculation Memorandum.\8\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See Memorandum, ``Final Determination Calculations for Gujarat Fluorochemicals Limited,'' dated concurrently with this notice (Final Calculation Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- All-Others Rate Section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that in the final determination, Commerce shall determine an estimated all-others rate for companies not individually examined. This rate shall be an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated subsidy rates established for those companies individually examined, excluding any zero and de minimis rates and any rates based entirely under section 776 of the Act. Commerce calculated an individual estimated countervailable subsidy rate for Gujarat Fluorochemicals Limited (GFL),\9\ the only individually examined exporter/producer in this investigation. Because the only individually calculated rate is not zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts otherwise available, the countervailable subsidy rate calculated for GFL is the rate assigned to all-other producers and exporters, pursuant to section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ As discussed in the Preliminary Determination, see Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 5-6, Commerce found Inox Leasing and Finance Limited to be cross-owned with GFL within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.525(b)(6)(iii). No parties commented on this preliminary finding. Accordingly, our finding of cross-ownership remains unchanged for this final determination. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Determination Commerce determines that the following countervailable subsidy rates exist: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subsidy rate Company (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Gujarat Fluorochemicals Limited (GFL)................... 3.60 All-Others.............................................. 3.60 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure Commerce intends to disclose its calculations and analysis performed to interested parties in this final determination within five days of its public announcement of our final determination in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation In accordance with section 703(d) of the Act, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to continue to suspend liquidation of all appropriate entries of PTFE resin from India as described in Appendix I to this notice, that were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption, on or after March 8, 2018, the date of publication of the Preliminary Determination in the Federal Register. Furthermore, we will instruct CBP to require a cash deposit for such entries of merchandise at the rates shown above, pursuant to section 705(c)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act. U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) Notification In accordance with section 705(d) of the Act, we will notify the ITC of our final affirmative countervailing duty (CVD) determination. In addition, we are making available to the ITC all non-privileged and nonproprietary information related to this investigation. We will allow the ITC access to all privileged and business proprietary information in our files, provided the ITC confirms that it will not disclose such information, either publicly or under an administrative protective order (APO), without the written consent of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Because the final determination in this proceeding is affirmative, in accordance with section 705(b) of the Act, the ITC will make its final determination regarding whether the domestic industry in the United States is materially injured, or threatened with material injury, by reason of imports of PTFE resin from India no later than 45 days after our final determination. If the ITC determines that material injury or threat of material injury does not exist, the proceeding will be terminated and all cash deposits will be refunded. If the ITC determines that such injury does exist, Commerce will issue a CVD order directing CBP to assess, upon further instruction by Commerce, countervailing duties on all imports of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn for warehouse, for consumption on or after the effective date of the suspension of liquidation, as discussed above in the ``Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation'' section. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders In the event the ITC issues a final negative injury determination, this notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an APO of their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation subject to sanction. This determination is issued and published pursuant to sections 705(d) and 777(i) of the Act. Dated: May 14, 2018. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I Scope of the Investigation The product covered by this investigation is polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) resin, including but not limited to granular, dispersion, or coagulated dispersion (also known as fine powder). PTFE is covered by the scope of this investigation whether filled or unfilled, whether or not modified, and whether or not containing co-polymer additives, pigments, or other materials. Also included is PTFE wet raw polymer. The chemical formula for PTFE is C2F4, and the Chemical Abstracts Service Registry number is 9002-84- 0. PTFE further processed into micropowder, having particle size typically ranging from 1 to 25 microns, and a melt-flow rate no less than 0.1 gram/10 minutes, is excluded from the scope of this investigation. PTFE is classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under subheadings 3904.61.0010 and 3904.61.0090. Subject merchandise may also be classified under HTSUS subheading 3904.69.5000. Although the HTSUS subheadings and CAS Number are provided for convenience and Customs purposes, the written description of the scope is dispositive. Appendix II List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background [[Page 23424]] III. Scope Comments IV. Scope of the Investigation V. Subsidies Valuation VI. Benchmarks and Discount Rates VII. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse Inferences VIII. Analysis of Programs IX. Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Whether Commerce is Conducting this Investigation in Accordance with its Obligations Comment 2: Commerce's Application of AFA for the GOI's Failure to Provide Requested Information Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should Use GFL's Corrections Presented at Verification Comment 4: Whether EPCGS Continues to Confer a Countervailable Benefit Comment 5: Whether the GOI Maintains a Reasonable or Effective Input Verification System for AAP Comment 6: Whether GFL Has a Reliable AAP Database Comment 7: Whether Commerce's Decision to find SHIS Countervailable is in Accordance with its Statutory Obligations Comment 8: Whether Commerce Should Use GFL's Minor Correction to the Electricity Duty Exemption for Wind Power Comment 9: Whether GFL Received a Countervailable Benefit from SGOG Preferential Water Rates Comment 10: Countervailability of Renewable Energy Certificates Comment 11: Whether a Tier-One Benchmark is Appropriate for SGOG Provision of Land for LTAR Comment 12: Whether MEIS is Tied to Non-Subject Merchandise Comment 13: Whether GFL Received a Benefit from Income Tax Exemption (80-IA) and Section 32AC (32AC) of the Income Tax Act X. Conclusion [FR Doc. 2018-10780 Filed 5-18-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![23422 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 98 / Monday, May 21, 2018 / Notices
subject merchandise entered, or purposes, the written description of the Centralized Electronic Service System
withdrawn from warehouse for scope of these proceedings is dispositive. (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
consumption on or after June 7, 2017 [FR Doc. 2018–10880 Filed 5–18–18; 8:45 am] registered users at http://
(i.e., 90 days prior to the date of the BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P access.trade.gov, and is available to all
publication of the Turkey Wire Rod parties in the Central Records Unit,
Preliminary Determination), but before room B8024 of the main Department of
September 5, 2017 (i.e., the date of DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Commerce building. In addition, a
publication of the Turkey Wire Rod complete version of the Issues and
Preliminary Determination). International Trade Administration Decision Memorandum can be accessed
[C–533–880] directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/
Notifications to Interested Parties frn/. The signed and electronic versions
This notice constitutes the Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin From of the Issues and Decision
countervailing duty orders with respect India: Final Affirmative Countervailing Memorandum are identical in content.
to wire rod from Italy and Turkey Duty Determination Scope of the Investigation
pursuant to section 706(a) of the Act. AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, The product covered by this
Interested parties can find a list of International Trade Administration, investigation is PTFE resin from India.
countervailing duty orders currently in Department of Commerce. For a complete description of the scope
effect at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ of this investigation, see Appendix I.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
stats/iastats1.html.
(Commerce) determines that Scope Comments
These orders are issued and published countervailable subsidies are being
in accordance with section 706(a) of the provided to producers and exporters of In accordance with the Preliminary
Act and 19 CFR 351.211(b). polytetrafluoroethylene resin (PTFE Scope Decision Memorandum,3
Dated: May 16, 2018. resin) from India. The period of Commerce provided parties an
investigation is April 1, 2016, through opportunity to provide comments on all
Gary Taverman,
March 31, 2017. issues regarding product coverage, (i.e.,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, for Antidumping scope). Although certain interested
and Countervailing Duty Operations, DATES: Applicable May 21, 2018.
parties commented on the scope of the
performing the non-exclusive functions and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
investigation as it appeared in the
Toby Vandall, Emily Halle, or Aimee Initiation Notice,4 we preliminarily
Enforcement and Compliance. Phelan, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, made no modifications to the scope of
Appendix Enforcement and Compliance, the investigation.5 No parties
International Trade Administration, commented on our Preliminary Scope
Scope of the Orders U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Decision Memorandum. As a result, in
The products covered by these orders are Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, this final determination, we are
certain hot-rolled products of carbon steel DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1664, adopting the preliminary decision not to
and alloy steel, in coils, of approximately (202) 482–0176, or (202) 482–0697, modify the scope language.
round cross section, less than 19.00 mm in respectively.
actual solid cross-sectional diameter. Methodology
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Specifically excluded are steel products Commerce conducted this
possessing the above-noted physical Background investigation in accordance with section
characteristics and meeting the Harmonized 701 of the Act. For each of the subsidy
This final determination is made in
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
accordance with section 705 of the programs found countervailable, we
definitions for (a) stainless steel; (b) tool
steel; (c) high-nickel steel; (d) ball bearing Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). determine that there is a subsidy, i.e., a
steel; or (e) concrete reinforcing bars and Commerce published the Preliminary financial contribution by an ‘‘authority’’
rods. Also excluded are free cutting steel Determination of this investigation on that gives rise to a benefit to the
(also known as free machining steel) March 8, 2018.1 For a complete recipient, and that the subsidy is
products (i.e., products that contain by description of the events that followed specific.6
weight one or more of the following the publication of the Preliminary The subsidy programs under
elements: 0.1 percent or more of lead, 0.05 Determination, see the Issues and investigation, and the issues raised in
percent or more of bismuth, 0.08 percent or Decision Memorandum issued the case and rebuttal briefs submitted by
more of sulfur, more than 0.04 percent of concurrently with this notice.2 A list of the parties, are discussed in the Issues
phosphorous, more than 0.05 percent of topics discussed in the Issues and and Decision Memorandum. A list of
selenium, or more than 0.01 percent of the issues that parties raised, and to
Decision Memorandum is included as
tellurium). All products meeting the physical which we responded in the Issues and
description of subject merchandise that are Appendix II to this notice. The Issues
and Decision Memorandum is a public Decision Memorandum, is attached to
not specifically excluded are included in this
document and is on file electronically this notice at Appendix II.
scope.
The products under these orders are via Enforcement and Compliance’s 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Polytetrafluoroethylene
currently classifiable under subheadings Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Resin from India and the People’s Republic of
7213.91.3011, 7213.91.3015, 7213.91.3020, China: Scope Comments Decision Memorandum for
7213.91.3093; 7213.91.4500, 7213.91.6000, 1 See Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin from India: the Preliminary Determinations,’’ dated February
7213.99.0030, 7227.20.0030, 7227.20.0080, Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty 28, 2018 (Preliminary Scope Decision
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
7227.90.6010, 7227.90.6020, 7227.90.6030, Determination, 83 FR 9842 (March 8, 2018) Memorandum).
and 7227.90.6035 of the HTSUS. Products (Preliminary Determination) and accompanying 4 See Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin from India:
Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation, 82
entered under subheadings 7213.99.0090 and 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for FR 49592 (October 26, 2017) (Initiation Notice).
7227.90.6090 of the HTSUS also may be 5 See Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum.
the Final Determination in the Countervailing Duty
included in this scope if they meet the Investigation of Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin from 6 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act
physical description of subject merchandise India,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E)
above. Although the HTSUS subheadings are adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of
provided for convenience and customs Memorandum). the Act regarding specificity.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:20 May 18, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM 21MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_23520/page/1.svg)
![23424 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 98 / Monday, May 21, 2018 / Notices
III. Scope Comments Enforcement and Compliance, destruction of proprietary information
IV. Scope of the Investigation International Trade Administration, disclosed under an APO in accordance
V. Subsidies Valuation U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
VI. Benchmarks and Discount Rates
VII. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, written notification of the return/
Adverse Inferences DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–4793. destruction of APO materials or
VIII. Analysis of Programs SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: conversion to judicial protective order is
IX. Discussion of the Issues hereby requested. Failure to comply
Comment 1: Whether Commerce is Background with the regulations and terms of an
Conducting this Investigation in On January 3, 2018, Commerce APO is a violation which is subject to
Accordance with its Obligations published the CVD order on softwood sanction.
Comment 2: Commerce’s Application of This notice is issued and published in
AFA for the GOI’s Failure to Provide
lumber from Canada.1 Subsequently,
Requested Information Commerce received requests for an accordance with 19 CFR 351.214(f)(3)
Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should expedited review from 34 companies. In and 351.214(k)(3).
Use GFL’s Corrections Presented at accordance with 19 CFR 351.214(k), Dated: May 15, 2018.
Verification Commerce initiated an expedited review James Maeder,
Comment 4: Whether EPCGS Continues to of the CVD order on softwood lumber
Confer a Countervailable Benefit Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for
from Canada for those companies that Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Comment 5: Whether the GOI Maintains a
requested a review and published the Operations performing the duties of Deputy
Reasonable or Effective Input
Verification System for AAP Initiation Notice on March 8, 2018.2 Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Comment 6: Whether GFL Has a Reliable Between March 2 and May 7, 2018, Countervailing Duty Operations.
AAP Database Commerce received letters from 25
Attachment
Comment 7: Whether Commerce’s Decision companies withdrawing their requests
to find SHIS Countervailable is in for an expedited review.3 For a listing of Below is the list of companies that
Accordance with its Statutory the companies that withdrew their withdrew their requests for an
Obligations expedited review requests, see expedited review of the countervailing
Comment 8: Whether Commerce Should duty order on softwood lumber from
Use GFL’s Minor Correction to the
Attachment to this notice.
Electricity Duty Exemption for Wind
Canada.
Partial Rescission of the Expedited
Power (1) Olympic Industries, Inc.
Review (2) Hainesville Sawmill Ltd.
Comment 9: Whether GFL Received a
Countervailable Benefit from SGOG Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.214(f)(1), (3) Ivor Forest Products Ltd.
Preferential Water Rates Commerce will rescind the expedited (4) Haida Forest Products Ltd.
Comment 10: Countervailability of review for any company that withdraws (5) Maibec Inc.
Renewable Energy Certificates its request for an expedited review (6) Canadian Bavarian Millwork and Lumber
Comment 11: Whether a Tier-One (7) Cedarline Industries Ltd.
within 60 days after the date of (8) Deep Cove Forest Products Inc.
Benchmark is Appropriate for SGOG
Provision of Land for LTAR publication of the notice of initiation. (9) Aquila Cedar Products Ltd.
Comment 12: Whether MEIS is Tied to The Initiation Notice for this expedited (10) Delco Forest Products Ltd.
Non-Subject Merchandise review was published on March 8, (11) Devon Lumber Co. Ltd.
Comment 13: Whether GFL Received a 2018.4 The withdrawals of review (12) H.J. Crabbe & Sons Ltd.
Benefit from Income Tax Exemption (80– requests were timely filed within the 60- (13) Marwood Ltd.
IA) and Section 32AC (32AC) of the day deadline. Therefore, in accordance (14) MP Atlantic Wood Ltd.
Income Tax Act with 19 CFR 351.214(f)(1), we are (15) 752615 B.C. Ltd., Fraserview
X. Conclusion Remanufacturing Inc., Gillwood Lumber,
rescinding the expedited review of the
[FR Doc. 2018–10780 Filed 5–18–18; 8:45 am] dba Fraserview Cedar Products
CVD order on softwood lumber from (16) Matériaux Blanchet Inc.
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Canada with respect to the 25 (17) Central Cedar Ltd.
companies listed in the Attachment. (18) Leslie Forest Products Ltd.
The expedited review will continue (19) Rielly Lumber Inc.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
with respect to all other firms for which (20) Antrim Cedar Corporation
International Trade Administration a review was initiated. (21) Chaleur Sawmills LP
(22) North Enderby Timber Ltd.
[C–122–858] Notification Regarding Administrative (23) Pacific Lumber Remanufacturing Inc.
Protective Order (24) Power Wood Corp.
Certain Softwood Lumber Products This notice serves as a reminder to (25) Canyon Lumber Company Ltd.
From Canada: Partial Rescission of parties subject to administrative [FR Doc. 2018–10779 Filed 5–18–18; 8:45 am]
Expedited Review of the protective order (APO) of their BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Countervailing Duty Order responsibility concerning the return or
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration, 1 See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Department of Commerce. Canada: Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing
Duty Determination and Countervailing Duty Order, International Trade Administration
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 83 FR 347 (January 3, 2018).
(Commerce) is partially rescinding the 2 See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from [A–570–983]
expedited review of the countervailing Canada: Initiation of Expedited Review of the
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
duty order (CVD) on certain softwood Countervailing Duty Order, 83 FR 9833 (March 8, Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the
2018) (Initiation Notice). People’s Republic of China: Final
lumber products (softwood lumber) 3 The withdrawal of expedited review request
from Canada for the period January 1, letters are available via Enforcement and
Results of the Antidumping Duty
2015, through December 31, 2015. Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Administrative Review; 2016–2017
Duty Centralized Electronic Service System
DATES: Applicable May 21, 2018. AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
(ACCESS), which is available at http://
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: access.trade.gov. International Trade Administration,
Kristen Johnson, AD/CVD Operations, 4 See Initiation Notice. Department of Commerce.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:20 May 18, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM 21MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_23520/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-11-02 11:07:16
Document Modified: 2018-11-02 11:07:16
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable May 21, 2018. | |
| Contact | Toby Vandall, Emily Halle, or Aimee Phelan, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 1664, (202) 482-0176, or (202) 482-0697, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 23422 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR