83 FR 24136 - Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Country of Origin of Fleetcam Vehicle Cameras
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 101 (May 24, 2018)
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 101 (May 24, 2018)
| Page Range | 24136-24138 | |
| FR Document | 2018-11091 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 101 (Thursday, May 24, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 24136-24138] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-11091] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY U.S. Customs and Border Protection Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Country of Origin of Fleetcam Vehicle Cameras AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security. ACTION: Notice of final determination. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This document provides notice that U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') has issued a final determination concerning the country of origin of a vehicle digital video camera known as the FleetCamTM. Based upon the facts presented, CBP has concluded that the processing in the United States does not substantially transform the imported digital video cameras for purposes of U.S. Government procurement. DATES: The final determination was issued on May 18, 2018. A copy of the final determination is attached. Any party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial review of this final determination within June 25, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Dinerstein, Valuation and Special Programs Branch, Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade (202- 325-0132). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that on May 18, 2018, pursuant to subpart B of Part 177, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Regulations (19 CFR part 177, subpart B), CBP issued a final determination concerning the country of origin of the FleetCamTM digital video camera, which may be offered to the United States Government under an undesignated government procurement contract. This final determination, HQ H294933, was issued under the procedures set forth at 19 CFR part 177, subpart B, which implements Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2511-18). In the final determination, CBP concluded the country of origin of the finished FleetCamTM was China, where the digital video camera and the camera's firmware were manufactured. Section 177.29, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177.29), provides that a notice of final determination shall be published in the Federal Register within 60 days of the date the final determination is issued. Section 177.30, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177.30), provides that any party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial review of a final determination within 30 days of publication of such determination in the Federal Register. Dated: May 18, 2018. Alice A. Kipel, Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade. HQ H294933 May 18, 2018 OT:RR:CTF:VS H294933 RSD CATEGORY: Origin Upneet S. Teji, Esq. Greensfelder, Hemker & Gale, P.C. 220 Madison Street, Suite 3300 Chicago, Illinois 60606 RE: Final Determination of U.S. Government Procurement; Country of Origin of a FleetCamTM vehicle camera Dear Mr. Teji: This is in response to your eruling request of January 27, 2018, for a final determination on behalf of Forward Thinking Systems LLC, (the Company), concerning the country of origin of a FleetCam vehicle camera pursuant to subpart B of Part 177, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') Regulations (19 CFR Sec. 177.21 et. seq.). We note that the Company is a party-at-interest within the meaning of 19 CFR Sec. 177.22(d)(1) and is entitled to request this final determination. FACTS: The product at issue is referred to as a FleetCam, which is a high-resolution digital video camera installed in a vehicle for streaming and recording images in real time. The FleetCam allows companies who purchase the product to watch the drivers that they employee in real-time, as well as view recorded speeding and other behavior moments. The FleetCam is also able to capture, record, and transmit images of a driver's view of the road ahead. The FleetCam is comprised of a physical digital video camera or several cameras setup together. The product also contains related cabling and a receiver that is compatible for use specifically with the Company's software and mobile applications. To use the FleetCam product, a user must purchase the hardware and a subscription to the software from the Company. The FleetCam's physical digital video camera is made in China and sourced by the Company from a Chinese firm. The firmware that is loaded onto the camera to allow it to be operational with the Company's software was also developed by the Chinese firm; however, you state that the firmware was developed based upon the design, specifications, and software architecture produced by the Company's staff located in the United States. The firmware developed for the FleetCam is designed specifically for use with the Company's fleet management software. The digital camera hardware (together with the firmware) is purchased by the Company from a Chinese producer. The firmware is not loaded onto the camera hardware until it is received by the Company in the United States. Upon receipt of the camera and the firmware code, the Company's engineers load and install the firmware on the camera hardware at the Company's offices in the United States. An additional hardware component of the [[Page 24137]] FleetCam product is the telematics gateway unit (the ``cabling''). The cabling units, including the receivers, are purchased from one or more manufacturers, and they are manufactured and procured from other TAA-compliant jurisdictions. The digital camera contains dual SD Cards that allow it to internally record the events that took place. The basic software component of the FleetCam product is produced in the United States. In addition, other than the firmware development for the camera hardware, all of the FleetCam software (including without limitation, software applications and mobile applications) are designed, developed, and integrated with the Company's cloud service in the United States. In order for the FleetCam to be functional and operational, the hardware and the related firmware is installed with the cabling and integrated with the FleetCam software platform. This compilation process occurs entirely in the United States. The Company sells the FleetCam software as a software-as-a service subscription, whereby the Company's customers enter into a separate subscription for use of the FleetCam software. After purchase of the FleetCam hardware, the Company's customers pay a separate monthly fee for using its proprietary software. The FleetCam hardware and software must be purchased together as part of the same package. Without the FleetCam software, it is stated that the camera and the related components are not operational. If a customer cancels its software subscription, the FleetCam product will no longer be functional. ISSUE: Whether the imported components including the digital video camera and cabling for the FleetCam are substantially transformed through the downloading of the Company's proprietary software in the United States so as to make the FleetCam a product of the United States. LAW AND ANALYSIS: CBP issues country of origin advisory rulings and final determinations as to whether an article is or would be a product of a designated country or instrumentality for the purposes of granting waivers of certain ``Buy American'' restrictions in U.S. law or practice for products offered for sale to the U.S. Government, pursuant to subpart B of Part 177, 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.21 et seq., which implements Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as amended (19 U.S.C. Sec. 2511 et seq.). Under the rule of origin set forth under 19 U.S.C. Sec. 2518(4)(B): An article is a product of a country or instrumentality only if (i) it is wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of that country or instrumentality, or (ii) in the case of an article which consists in whole or in part of materials from another country or instrumentality, it has been substantially transformed into a new and different article of commerce with a name, character, or use distinct from that of the article or articles from which it was so transformed. See also 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.22(a). In rendering final determinations for purposes of U.S. Government procurement, CBP applies the provisions of subpart B of Part 177 consistent with the Federal Procurement Regulations. See 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.21. In this regard, CBP recognizes that the Federal Acquisition Regulations restrict the U.S. Government's purchase of products to U.S.-made or designated country end products for acquisitions subject to the Trade Agreements Act. See 48 C.F.R. Sec. 25.403(c)(1). The Federal Acquisition Regulations define ``U.S.-made end product'' as ``an article that is mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States or that is substantially transformed in the United States into a new and different article of commerce with name, character, or use distinct from that of the article or articles from which it was transformed.'' See 48 C.F.R Sec. 25.003. In Data General v. United States, 4 C.I.T. 182 (1982), the court determined that the programming of a foreign PROM (Programmable Read-Only Memory chip) in the United States substantially transformed the PROM into a U.S. article. In the United States, the programming bestowed upon each integrated circuit its electronic function, that is, its ``memory'' which could be retrieved. A distinct physical change was effected in the PROM by the opening or closing of the fuses, depending on the method of programming. The essence of the article, its interconnections or stored memory, was established by programming. See also, Texas Instruments v. United States, 681 F.2d 778, 782 (CCPA 1982) (stating the substantial transformation issue is a ``mixed question of technology and customs law''); HQ 735027, dated September 7, 1993 (programming blank media (EEPROM) with instructions that allow it to perform certain functions that prevent piracy of software constitutes a substantial transformation); and, HQ 734518, dated June 28, 1993 (motherboards are not substantially transformed by the implanting of the central processing unit on the board because, whereas in Data General use was being assigned to the PROM, the use of the motherboard had already been determined when the importer imported it). ``The term `character' is defined as `one of the essentials of structure, form, materials, or function that together make up and usually distinguish the individual.' '' National Hand Tool Corp. v. United States, 16 C.I.T. 308, 311 (1992) (citing Webster's Third New International Dictionary (1981)). In National Juice Prods. Ass'n v. United States, the Court of International Trade applied the ``essence test'' and found that the fundamental character of orange juice concentrate was not changed by the addition of water, orange essences, and oils to make frozen concentrated orange juice, and hence, there was no substantial transformation. 10 C.I.T. 48, 628 F. Supp. 978 (1986). HQ H258960, dated May 19, 2016, reviewed the country of origin of hardware components of certain transceivers in two scenarios that are instructive to the case at issue here. The hardware components of the transceivers were wholly manufactured in a foreign country and imported into the United States. In the first scenario, the transceivers were ``blanks'' and completely non-functional and specialized proprietary software was developed and downloaded in the United States, making the transceivers functional and compatible with the OEM technology. In the second scenario, the transceivers were preprogrammed with a generic program that was replaced with specialized proprietary software. It was argued that in both scenarios, the imported hardware was substantially transformed by the development, configuration, and downloading operations of the U.S. origin software. In the first scenario, we found that the non- functional transceivers were substantially transformed as a result of downloading performed in the United States, with proprietary software developed in the United States. However, in the second scenario, it was determined that since the transceivers had generic network functionality, programming them merely to customize their network compatibility would not actually change the identity of the imported transceivers. See also HQ H241177, dated December 3, 2013. Accordingly, it was determined that the country where the last substantial transformation occurred was China or another Asian country where the hardware components were manufactured. A similar finding was made in HQ H284523, dated August 23, 2017, where imported tablet computers were preprogrammed with a generic program when they were first imported. The tablets could perform all of the standard functions of an android tablet in their imported condition. After importation, the imported tablets were customized for a particular use as part of a system to collect and transmit a patient's medical data by the installation of proprietary software. The original tablet had the ability to perform all of previous functions, but it was determined that for ease of use and for other reasons it was best to disable these functions and to consolidate them in one function via the specialized software. It was stated that the general functionality of the tablet was removed and replaced so that it was easier for patients to use the device and access the system. It was also stated that the security of the patient's medical data would be better protected. In HQ H284523, we noted that it was clear that merely loading the specialized software onto the tablet computer that remained fully functional as a computer would be insufficient to constitute a new and different article of commerce, since all of the functionality of the original computer would be retained. In this case, the Company's proprietary software is being installed onto a digital video camera so that the camera can provide live-streaming of a driver and his view of the road from multiple vantage points. In addition, after the software is installed onto the FleetCam, it is able to capture, record, and store footage of particular incidents that may have occurred. While the particular proprietary software is written and downloaded in the United States, we note that the firmware being used to operate the FleetCam, although designed in the United States, was not written in the United States, but in China. Therefore, similar to HQ H284523, where the tablet could function, in this case, because the digital camera contains SD cards, it can fully function as a digital [[Page 24138]] video camera by capturing images and recording footage. The installation of the proprietary software onto the FleetCam only customizes the digital cameras to the Company's particular use and does not change the basic identity of the imported digital video cameras because they retain all their functions with the same name, character and use of the imported digital video cameras. Therefore, we find that the FleetCam is not substantially transformed by the downloading of the Company's proprietary software onto the imported digital video cameras, and the country of origin of the FleetCam will be China where the main hardware, including the digital cameras and the firmware, is manufactured. HOLDING: Based on the information presented in this case, the imported digital video cameras are not substantially transformed by the processing performed in the United States. Therefore, the country of origin of the FleetCams is the country where the digital video cameras and the firmware were originally produced, which in this case is China. Notice of this final determination will be given in the Federal Register, as required by 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.29. Any party-at- interest other than the party which requested this final determination may request, pursuant to 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.31, that CBP reexamine the matter anew and issue a new final determination. Pursuant to 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.30, any party-at-interest may, within 30 days of publication of the Federal Register Notice referenced above, seek judicial review of this final determination before the Court of International Trade. Sincerely, Alice A. Kipel, Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings [FR Doc. 2018-11091 Filed 5-23-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
![24136 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 101 / Thursday, May 24, 2018 / Notices
CBPL No. ASTM Title
27–13 .............. D4294 Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum and Petroleum Products by Energy-Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence
Spectrometry.
27–46 .............. D5002 Standard Test Method for Density and Relative Density of Crude Oils by Digital Density Analyzer.
Pending .......... D3227 Standard Test Method for (Thiol Mercaptan) Sulfur in Gasoline, Kerosene, Aviation Turbine, and Distillate Fuels
(Potentiometric Method).
Pending .......... D4007 Standard Test Method for Water and Sediment in Crude Oil by the Centrifuge Method (Laboratory Procedure).
Pending .......... D4807 Standard Test Method for Sediment in Crude Oil by Membrane Filtration.
Pending .......... D5705 Standard Test Method for Measurement of Hydrogen Sulfide in the Vapor Phase Above Residual Fuel Oils.
Anyone wishing to employ this entity final determination is attached. Any 220 Madison Street, Suite 3300
to conduct laboratory analyses and party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR Chicago, Illinois 60606
gauger services should request and 177.22(d), may seek judicial review of RE: Final Determination of U.S. Government
receive written assurances from the this final determination within June 25, Procurement; Country of Origin of a
entity that it is accredited or approved 2018. FleetCamTM vehicle camera
by the U.S. Customs and Border FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dear Mr. Teji:
Protection to conduct the specific test or This is in response to your eruling request
Robert Dinerstein, Valuation and of January 27, 2018, for a final determination
gauger service requested. Alternatively, Special Programs Branch, Regulations on behalf of Forward Thinking Systems LLC,
inquiries regarding the specific test or and Rulings, Office of Trade (202–325– (the Company), concerning the country of
gauger service this entity is accredited 0132). origin of a FleetCam vehicle camera pursuant
or approved to perform may be directed SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is to subpart B of Part 177, U.S. Customs and
to the U.S. Customs and Border hereby given that on May 18, 2018, Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) Regulations (19
Protection by calling (202) 344–1060. pursuant to subpart B of Part 177, CFR § 177.21 et. seq.). We note that the
The inquiry may also be sent to Company is a party-at-interest within the
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) meaning of 19 CFR § 177.22(d)(1) and is
CBPGaugersLabs@cbp.dhs.gov. Please Regulations (19 CFR part 177, subpart entitled to request this final determination.
reference the website listed below for a B), CBP issued a final determination
complete listing of CBP approved concerning the country of origin of the FACTS:
gaugers and accredited laboratories. FleetCamTM digital video camera, which The product at issue is referred to as a
http://www.cbp.gov/about/labs- may be offered to the United States FleetCam, which is a high-resolution digital
scientific/commercial-gaugers-and- Government under an undesignated video camera installed in a vehicle for
laboratories. streaming and recording images in real time.
government procurement contract. This The FleetCam allows companies who
Dated: May 16, 2018. final determination, HQ H294933, was purchase the product to watch the drivers
Dave Fluty, issued under the procedures set forth at that they employee in real-time, as well as
Executive Director, Laboratories and 19 CFR part 177, subpart B, which view recorded speeding and other behavior
Scientific Services. implements Title III of the Trade moments. The FleetCam is also able to
[FR Doc. 2018–11090 Filed 5–23–18; 8:45 am] Agreements Act of 1979, as amended capture, record, and transmit images of a
(19 U.S.C. 2511–18). In the final driver’s view of the road ahead. The
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
determination, CBP concluded the FleetCam is comprised of a physical digital
video camera or several cameras setup
country of origin of the finished together. The product also contains related
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND FleetCamTM was China, where the cabling and a receiver that is compatible for
SECURITY digital video camera and the camera’s use specifically with the Company’s software
firmware were manufactured. and mobile applications. To use the
U.S. Customs and Border Protection Section 177.29, CBP Regulations (19 FleetCam product, a user must purchase the
CFR 177.29), provides that a notice of hardware and a subscription to the software
Notice of Issuance of Final final determination shall be published from the Company.
Determination Concerning Country of in the Federal Register within 60 days The FleetCam’s physical digital video
Origin of Fleetcam Vehicle Cameras of the date the final determination is camera is made in China and sourced by the
Company from a Chinese firm. The firmware
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border issued. Section 177.30, CBP Regulations
that is loaded onto the camera to allow it to
Protection, Department of Homeland (19 CFR 177.30), provides that any be operational with the Company’s software
Security. party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR was also developed by the Chinese firm;
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of a however, you state that the firmware was
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
final determination within 30 days of developed based upon the design,
SUMMARY: This document provides publication of such determination in the specifications, and software architecture
notice that U.S. Customs and Border Federal Register. produced by the Company’s staff located in
Protection (‘‘CBP’’) has issued a final the United States. The firmware developed
Dated: May 18, 2018. for the FleetCam is designed specifically for
determination concerning the country of Alice A. Kipel, use with the Company’s fleet management
origin of a vehicle digital video camera Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings, software. The digital camera hardware
known as the FleetCamTM. Based upon Office of Trade. (together with the firmware) is purchased by
the facts presented, CBP has concluded the Company from a Chinese producer.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
that the processing in the United States HQ H294933 The firmware is not loaded onto the
does not substantially transform the camera hardware until it is received by the
May 18, 2018 Company in the United States. Upon receipt
imported digital video cameras for
purposes of U.S. Government OT:RR:CTF:VS H294933 RSD of the camera and the firmware code, the
procurement. Company’s engineers load and install the
CATEGORY: Origin firmware on the camera hardware at the
DATES: The final determination was Upneet S. Teji, Esq. Company’s offices in the United States. An
issued on May 18, 2018. A copy of the Greensfelder, Hemker & Gale, P.C. additional hardware component of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:10 May 23, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24MYN1.SGM 24MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_24237/page/1.svg)
![24138 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 101 / Thursday, May 24, 2018 / Notices
video camera by capturing images and ADDRESSES: A copy of the plats may be is received by the State Director for
recording footage. The installation of the obtained from the Alaska Public Alaska during regular business hours; if
proprietary software onto the FleetCam only Information Center at the BLM Alaska received after regular business hours, a
customizes the digital cameras to the State Office, 222 W. 7th Avenue, notice of protest will be considered filed
Company’s particular use and does not
change the basic identity of the imported
Anchorage, Alaska 99513, upon the next business day. A written
digital video cameras because they retain all required payment. The plats may be statement of reasons in support of a
their functions with the same name, viewed at this location at no cost. Please protest, if not filed with the notice of
character and use of the imported digital use this address when filing written protest, must be filed with the State
video cameras. Therefore, we find that the protests. Director for Alaska within 30 calendar
FleetCam is not substantially transformed by
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
days after the notice of protest is filed.
the downloading of the Company’s If a notice of protest against a plat of
proprietary software onto the imported Douglas N. Haywood, Chief, Branch of
Cadastral Survey, Bureau of Land survey is received prior to the
digital video cameras, and the country of scheduled date of official filing, the
origin of the FleetCam will be China where Management, Alaska State Office, 222
W. 7th Avenue, Anchorage, Alaska official filing of the plat of survey
the main hardware, including the digital
cameras and the firmware, is manufactured. 99513; 1–907–271–5481; dhaywood@ identified in the notice of protest will be
blm.gov. Persons who use a stayed pending consideration of the
HOLDING: protest. A plat of survey will not be
telecommunications device for the deaf
Based on the information presented in this
may call the Federal Relay Service (FRS) officially filed until the dismissal or
case, the imported digital video cameras are resolution of all protests of the plat.
not substantially transformed by the at 1–800–877–8339 to contact the above
Before including your address, phone
processing performed in the United States. individual during normal business
number, email address, or other
Therefore, the country of origin of the hours. The FRS is available 24 hours a
personal identifying information in a
FleetCams is the country where the digital day, 7 days a week, to leave a message
notice of protest or statement of reasons,
video cameras and the firmware were or question with the above individual.
originally produced, which in this case is you should be aware that the documents
You will receive a reply during normal
China. you submit, including your personal
business hours.
Notice of this final determination will be identifying information, may be made
given in the Federal Register, as required by SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The lands publicly available in their entirety at
19 C.F.R. § 177.29. Any party-at-interest other surveyed are: any time. While you can ask us to
than the party which requested this final U.S. Survey No. 3813, accepted March 5, withhold your personal identifying
determination may request, pursuant to 19 2018 information from public review, we
C.F.R. § 177.31, that CBP reexamine the U.S. Survey No. 3923, accepted March 5, cannot guarantee that we will be able to
matter anew and issue a new final 2018
determination. Pursuant to 19 C.F.R.
do so.
U.S. Survey No. 4269, accepted March 5,
§ 177.30, any party-at-interest may, within 30 2018 Authority: 43 U.S.C. Chap. 3.
days of publication of the Federal Register U.S. Survey No. 4738, accepted January 5,
Notice referenced above, seek judicial review Douglas N. Haywood,
2018
of this final determination before the Court U.S. Survey No. 9891, accepted January 5, Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Alaska.
of International Trade. 2018 [FR Doc. 2018–11148 Filed 5–23–18; 8:45 am]
Sincerely, U.S. Survey No. 14461, accepted March 13, BILLING CODE 4310–JA–P
2018
Alice A. Kipel,
U.S. Survey No. 14462, accepted March 13,
Executive Director, 2018 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Regulations and Rulings U.S. Survey No. 14478, accepted January 29,
[FR Doc. 2018–11091 Filed 5–23–18; 8:45 am] 2018 National Park Service
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P Copper River Meridian, Alaska [NPS–WASO–NRNHL–DTS#–25581;
T. 67 S., R. 75 E., accepted April 4, 2018 PPWOCRADI0, PCU00RP14.R50000]
T. 67 S., R. 76 E., accepted April 4, 2018
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR T. 68 S., R. 75 E., accepted April 4, 2018 National Register of Historic Places;
T. 68 S., R. 76 E., accepted April 4, 2018 Notification of Pending Nominations
Bureau of Land Management T. 69 S., R. 79 E., accepted March 26, 2018 and Related Actions
T. 70 S., R. 79 E., accepted April 4, 2018
[LLAK940000.L14100000. BX0000. AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
T. 75 S., R. 86 E., accepted April 4, 2018
18X.LXSS001L0100]
ACTION: Notice.
Kateel River Meridian, Alaska
Filing of Plats of Survey: Alaska T. 2 S., R. 40 W., accepted May 1, 2018 SUMMARY: The National Park Service is
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, T. 3 S., R. 40 W., accepted May 1, 2018 soliciting comments on the significance
Interior. A person or party who wishes to of properties nominated before May 5,
protest one or more plats of survey 2018, for listing or related actions in the
ACTION: Notice of official filing.
identified above must file a written National Register of Historic Places.
SUMMARY: The plats of survey of lands notice of protest with the State Director DATES: Comments should be submitted
described in this notice are scheduled to for Alaska, BLM. The notice of protest by June 8, 2018.
be officially filed in the Bureau of Land must identify the plat(s) of survey that ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent via
Management (BLM), Alaska State Office, the person or party wishes to protest. U.S. Postal Service and all other carriers
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Anchorage, Alaska. The surveys, which The notice of protest must be filed to the National Register of Historic
were executed at the request of the U.S. before the scheduled date of official Places, National Park Service, 1849 C St.
Coast Guard, the Bureau of Indian filing for the plat(s) of survey being NW, MS 7228, Washington, DC 20240.
Affairs and BLM, are necessary for the protested. Any notice of protest filed SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
management of these lands. after the scheduled date of official filing properties listed in this notice are being
DATES: Protests must be received by the will not be considered. A notice of considered for listing or related actions
BLM by June 25, 2018. protest is considered filed on the date it in the National Register of Historic
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:10 May 23, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00058 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24MYN1.SGM 24MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_24237/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-05-24 00:05:12
Document Modified: 2018-05-24 00:05:12
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice of final determination. | |
| Dates | The final determination was issued on May 18, 2018. A copy of the final determination is attached. Any party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial review of this final determination within June 25, 2018. | |
| Contact | Robert Dinerstein, Valuation and Special Programs Branch, Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade (202- 325-0132). | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 24136 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR