83 FR 24443 - Safety Zone; Willamette River, Lake Oswego, OR

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 103 (May 29, 2018)

Page Range		24443-24445
FR Document		2018-11370

The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone for certain waters of the Willamette River near Lake Oswego, OR. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on these navigable waters during a fireworks display on July 4, 2018. This proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from being in the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Columbia River or a designated representative. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 103 (Tuesday, May 29, 2018)

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 29, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 24443-24445]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-11370]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2018-0380]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Willamette River, Lake Oswego, OR

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone 
for certain waters of the Willamette River near Lake Oswego, OR. This 
action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on these 
navigable waters during a fireworks display on July 4, 2018. This 
proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from being in 
the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Columbia 
River or a designated representative. We invite your comments on this 
proposed rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast 
Guard on or before June 13, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2018-0380 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for 
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further 
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this 
proposed rulemaking, call or email LCDR Laura Springer, Waterways 
Management Division, Marine Safety Unit Portland, U.S. Coast Guard; 
telephone 503-240-9319, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    On April 17, 2018, the City of Lake Oswego notified the Coast Guard 
that it will be conducting a fireworks display from 10 p.m. to 10:30 
p.m. on July 4, 2018, to commemorate Independence Day. The fireworks 
will launch from a barge in the Willamette River approximately 150 
yards east of George Rodgers Park in Lake Oswego, OR. Hazards from 
firework displays include accidental discharge of fireworks, dangerous 
projectiles, and falling hot embers or other debris. The Captain of the 
Port Columbia River has determined that potential hazards associated 
with the fireworks in this display are a safety concern for anyone 
within a 450-yard radius of the barge.
    The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of vessels 
and the navigable waters within a 450-yard radius of the fireworks 
barge before, during, and after the scheduled event. The Coast Guard 
proposes this rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The Captain of the Port Columbia River proposes to establish a 
safety zone from 9 p.m. to 11:30 p.m. on July 4, 2018. The safety zone 
would cover all navigable waters of the Willamette River within 450-
yards of a barge located at 45[deg]24'37.46'' N, 122[deg]39'29.70'' W, 
in vicinity of George Rogers Park in Lake Oswego, OR. The duration of 
the zone is intended to ensure the safety of vessels and these 
navigable waters before, during, and after the scheduled 10 p.m. to 
10:30 p.m. fireworks display. No vessel or person would be permitted to 
enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a 
designated representative. The

[[Page 24444]]

regulatory text we are proposing appears at the end of this document.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes 
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our 
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and 
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control 
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been 
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt 
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size, 
location, duration, and time-of-day of the safety zone. Vessel traffic 
would be able to safely transit around this safety zone which would 
impact a small designated area of the Willamette River for 
approximately two hours during the evening when vessel traffic is 
normally low. Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice 
to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone, and the rule 
would allow vessels to seek permission to enter the zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this 
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic 
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what 
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect 
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you 
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that 
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action 
of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of 
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and 
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under 
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or 
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not 
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule 
elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland 
Security Directive 023-01, which guides the Coast Guard in complying 
with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-
4370f), and have made a preliminary determination that this action is 
one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively 
have a significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule 
involves a safety zone lasting less than two and a half hours that 
would prohibit entry within 450-yards of a fireworks barge. Normally 
such actions are categorically excluded from further review under 
paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-
01-001-01, Rev. 01. A preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration 
supporting this determination is available in the docket where 
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may 
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this 
proposed rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places, or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking, 
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment 
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If 
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this 
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which 
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or 
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal at http://

[[Page 24445]]

www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT section of this document for alternate instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted 
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any 
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the 
docket, visit http://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket, 
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's 
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up 
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a 
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes 
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6 and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T13-0380 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T13-0380   Safety Zone; Willamette River, Lake Oswego, OR.

    (a) Safety zone. The following area is designated a safety zone: 
Waters of the Willamette River, within a 450-yard radius of the 
fireworks barge located at 45[deg]24'37.46'' N, 122[deg]39'29.70'' W in 
vicinity of George Rogers Park in Lake Oswego, OR.
    (b) Regulations. In accordance with Sec.  165.23, no person may 
enter or remain in this safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of 
the Port Columbia River or his designated representative. Also in 
accordance with Sec.  165.23, no person may bring into, or allow to 
remain in this safety zone any vehicle, vessel, or object unless 
authorized by the Captain of the Port Columbia River or his designated 
representative.
    (c) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 9 p.m. 
to 11:30 p.m. on July 4, 2018.

    Dated: May 22, 2018.
D.F. Berliner,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port, Sector Columbia 
River.
[FR Doc. 2018-11370 Filed 5-25-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

24444 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 103 / Tuesday, May 29, 2018 / Proposed Rules

regulatory text we are proposing appears If you think that your business, their discretionary regulatory actions. In
at the end of this document. organization, or governmental particular, the Act addresses actions
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity that may result in the expenditure by a
IV. Regulatory Analyses
and that this rule would have a State, local, or tribal government, in the
We developed this proposed rule after significant economic impact on it, aggregate, or by the private sector of
considering numerous statutes and please submit a comment (see $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
Executive orders related to rulemaking. ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it more in any one year. Though this
Below we summarize our analyses qualifies and how and to what degree proposed rule would not result in such
based on a number of these statutes and this rule would economically affect it. an expenditure, we do discuss the
Executive orders and we discuss First Under section 213(a) of the Small effects of this rule elsewhere in this
Amendment rights of protestors. Business Regulatory Enforcement preamble.
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
A. Regulatory Planning and Review F. Environment
we want to assist small entities in
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 understanding this proposed rule. If the We have analyzed this proposed rule
direct agencies to assess the costs and rule would affect your small business, under Department of Homeland
benefits of available regulatory organization, or governmental Security Directive 023–01, which guides
alternatives and, if regulation is jurisdiction and you have questions the Coast Guard in complying with the
necessary, to select regulatory concerning its provisions or options for National Environmental Policy Act of
approaches that maximize net benefits. compliance, please contact the person 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION made a preliminary determination that
to control regulatory costs through a CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will this action is one of a category of actions
budgeting process. This NPRM has not not retaliate against small entities that that do not individually or cumulatively
been designated a ‘‘significant question or complain about this have a significant effect on the human
regulatory action,’’ under Executive proposed rule or any policy or action of environment. This proposed rule
Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM the Coast Guard. involves a safety zone lasting less than
has not been reviewed by the Office of two and a half hours that would
C. Collection of Information prohibit entry within 450-yards of a
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt This proposed rule would not call for fireworks barge. Normally such actions
from the requirements of Executive a new collection of information under are categorically excluded from further
Order 13771. the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 review under paragraph L60(a) of
This regulatory action determination (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
is based on the size, location, duration, Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 01. A
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
and time-of-day of the safety zone. preliminary Record of Environmental
Governments
Vessel traffic would be able to safely Consideration supporting this
A rule has implications for federalism determination is available in the docket
transit around this safety zone which under Executive Order 13132,
would impact a small designated area of where indicated under ADDRESSES. We
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct seek any comments or information that
the Willamette River for approximately effect on the States, on the relationship
two hours during the evening when may lead to the discovery of a
between the national government and significant environmental impact from
vessel traffic is normally low. Moreover, the States, or on the distribution of
the Coast Guard would issue a this proposed rule.
power and responsibilities among the
Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF– various levels of government. We have G. Protest Activities
FM marine channel 16 about the zone, analyzed this proposed rule under that The Coast Guard respects the First
and the rule would allow vessels to seek Order and have determined that it is Amendment rights of protesters.
permission to enter the zone. consistent with the fundamental Protesters are asked to contact the
B. Impact on Small Entities federalism principles and preemption person listed in the FOR FURTHER
requirements described in Executive INFORMATION CONTACT section to
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of Order 13132. coordinate protest activities so that your
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, Also, this proposed rule does not have message can be received without
requires Federal agencies to consider tribal implications under Executive jeopardizing the safety or security of
the potential impact of regulations on Order 13175, Consultation and people, places, or vessels.
small entities during rulemaking. The Coordination with Indian Tribal
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small Governments, because it would not have V. Public Participation and Request for
businesses, not-for-profit organizations a substantial direct effect on one or Comments
that are independently owned and more Indian tribes, on the relationship We view public participation as
operated and are not dominant in their between the Federal Government and essential to effective rulemaking, and
fields, and governmental jurisdictions Indian tribes, or on the distribution of will consider all comments and material
with populations of less than 50,000. power and responsibilities between the received during the comment period.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. Federal Government and Indian tribes. Your comment can help shape the
605(b) that this proposed rule would not If you believe this proposed rule has outcome of this rulemaking. If you
have a significant economic impact on implications for federalism or Indian submit a comment, please include the
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS

a substantial number of small entities. tribes, please contact the person listed docket number for this rulemaking,
While some owners or operators of in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION indicate the specific section of this
vessels intending to transit the safety CONTACT section. document to which each comment
zone may be small entities, for the applies, and provide a reason for each
reasons stated in section IV.A above, E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act suggestion or recommendation.
this proposed rule would not have a The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act We encourage you to submit
significant economic impact on any of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires comments through the Federal
vessel owner or operator. Federal agencies to assess the effects of eRulemaking Portal at http://

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:08 May 25, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\29MYP1.SGM 29MYP1

Document Created: 2018-05-26 00:48:16
Document Modified: 2018-05-26 00:48:16

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Dates		Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before June 13, 2018.
Contact		If you have questions about this proposed rulemaking, call or email LCDR Laura Springer, Waterways Management Division, Marine Safety Unit Portland, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 503-240-9319, email [email protected]
FR Citation		83 FR 24443
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

83 FR 24443 - Safety Zone; Willamette River, Lake Oswego, OR

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 103 (May 29, 2018)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard