83 FR 24714 - Air Plan Approval and Air Quality Designation; KY; Redesignation of the Kentucky Portion of the Louisville Unclassifiable Area
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 104 (May 30, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 104 (May 30, 2018)
| Page Range | 24714-24716 | |
| FR Document | 2018-11567 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 30, 2018)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 24714-24716] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-11567] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 81 [EPA-R04-OAR-2017-0390; FRL-9978-59-Region 4] Air Plan Approval and Air Quality Designation; KY; Redesignation of the Kentucky Portion of the Louisville Unclassifiable Area AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency. ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: On May 4, 2018, the Commonwealth of Kentucky, through the Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet, Division for Air Quality (KDAQ), submitted a request for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to redesignate the portion of Kentucky that is within the bi- state Louisville, KY-IN fine particulate matter (PM2.5 ) unclassifiable area (hereinafter referred to as the ``bi-state Louisville Area'' or ``Area'') to unclassifiable/attainment for the 2012 primary annual PM2.5 national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). The bi-state Louisville Area consists of Jefferson County and a portion of Bullitt County in Kentucky as well as Clark and Floyd Counties in Indiana. EPA now has sufficient data to determine that the bi-state Louisville Area is in attainment of the 2012 primary annual PM2.5 NAAQS. Therefore, EPA is proposing to approve Kentucky's request and redesignate the Area to unclassifiable/ attainment for the 2012 primary annual PM2.5 NAAQS based upon complete, quality-assured, and certified ambient air monitoring data showing that the PM2.5 monitors in the bi-state Louisville Area are in compliance with the 2012 primary annual PM2.5 NAAQS. DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 29, 2018. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04- OAR-2017-0390 at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madolyn Sanchez, Air Regulatory Management Section, in the Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Madolyn Sanchez may be reached by phone at (404) 562-9644 or via electronic mail at [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background The Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) establishes a process for air quality management through the establishment and implementation of the NAAQS. After the promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS, EPA is required to designate areas, pursuant to section 107(d)(1) of the CAA, as attainment, nonattainment, or unclassifiable. On December 14, 2012, EPA revised the primary annual NAAQS for PM2.5 at a level of 12 micrograms per cubic meter [[Page 24715]] ([mu]g/m\3\), based on a 3-year average of annual mean PM2.5 concentrations. See 78 FR 3085 (January 15, 2013). EPA established the standard based on significant evidence and numerous health studies demonstrating that serious health effects are associated with exposures to particulate matter. The process for designating areas following promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS is contained in section 107(d)(1) of the CAA. On December 18, 2014, EPA designated the majority of areas across the country as nonattainment, unclassifiable/attainment, or unclassifiable \1\ for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS based upon air quality monitoring data from monitors for calendar years 2011-2013. See 80 FR 2206 (January 15, 2015). EPA's January 15, 2015, rulemaking also described a process by which EPA would evaluate any complete, quality- assured, certified air quality monitoring data from 2014 that a state submitted for consideration before February 27, 2015. EPA stated that it would evaluate whether, with the inclusion of certified 2014 data, the 3-year design value for 2012-2014 suggests that a change in the initial designation would be appropriate for an area. If EPA agreed that a change in the initial designation would be appropriate, EPA would withdraw the designation announced in the January 15, 2015, document for such area before the effective date and issue another designation reflecting the inclusion of 2014 data. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ For the initial PM area designations in 2014 (for the 2012 annual PM2.5 NAAQS), EPA used a designation category of ``unclassifiable/attainment'' for areas that had monitors showing attainment of the standard and were not contributing to nearby violations and for areas that did not have monitors but for which EPA had reason to believe were likely attaining the standard and not contributing to nearby violations. EPA used the category ``unclassifiable'' for areas in which EPA could not determine, based upon available information, whether or not the NAAQS was being met and/or EPA had not determined the area to be contributing to nearby violations. EPA reserves the ``attainment'' category for when EPA redesignates a nonattainment area that has attained the relevant NAAQS and has an approved maintenance plan. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In a follow-up designation action published on April 7, 2015 (80 FR 18535), EPA designated five areas as unclassifiable/attainment in Georgia, including two neighboring counties in the bordering states of Alabama and South Carolina, that were initially deferred in EPA's January 15, 2015, rulemaking. In the same action, EPA changed the designations for one area in Ohio, two areas in Pennsylvania, and one bi-state area with portions in Kentucky and Ohio from nonattainment to unclassifiable/attainment. The bi-state Louisville Area was changed from nonattainment to unclassifiable. EPA initially designated the bi-state Louisville Area as nonattainment in its January 15, 2015, rulemaking based on ambient air quality data collected from 2011-2013. In that time period, a monitor in Clark County, Indiana, showed a violation of the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS. Per its policy, EPA explained that it would change the designation for the Area if data showed that the monitor in Clark County, Indiana, met the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS for the design value period 2012-2014, and Indiana elected to early certify 2014 ambient air quality data. Indiana submitted complete, quality- assured, and certified 2014 data from the ambient air quality monitor in Clark County, Indiana, by the prescribed deadline of February 27, 2015, showing that the monitor was attaining the NAAQS. However, as noted in the final technical support document (TSD) for the Area included in the docket for the January 15, 2015, rulemaking,\2\ EPA explained that because air quality data in the Jefferson County, Kentucky portion of the Area were invalid due to issues with the collection and analysis of PM2.5 filter-based samples, EPA could only change the designation to unclassifiable. Therefore, EPA changed the designation of the Area from nonattainment to unclassifiable in the action published on April 15, 2015. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ Available in the January 15, 2015, rulemaking docket as document number EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0918-0322. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- II. What are the criteria for redesignating an area from unclassifiable to unclassifiable/attainment? Section 107(d)(3) of the CAA provides the framework for changing the area designations for any NAAQS pollutants. Section 107(d)(3)(A) provides that the Administrator may notify the Governor of any state that the designation of an area should be revised ``on the basis of air quality data, planning and control considerations, or any other air quality-related considerations the Administrator deems appropriate.'' The Act further provides in section 107(d)(3)(D) that even if the Administrator has not notified a state Governor that a designation should be revised, the Governor of any state may, on the Governor's own motion, submit a request to revise the designation of any area, and the Administrator must approve or deny the request. When approving or denying a request to redesignate an area, EPA bases its decision on the air quality data for the area as well as the considerations under section 107(d)(3)(A).\3\ In keeping with section 107(d)(1)(A), areas that are redesignated to unclassifiable/attainment must meet the requirements for attainment areas and thus must meet the relevant NAAQS. In addition, the area must not contribute to ambient air quality in a nearby area that does not meet the NAAQS. The relevant monitoring data must be collected and quality-assured in accordance with 40 CFR part 58 and recorded in the EPA Air Quality System (AQS) database. The designated monitors generally should have remained at the same location for the duration of the monitoring period.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ While CAA section 107(d)(3)(E) also lists specific requirements for redesignations, those requirements only apply to redesignations of nonattainment areas to attainment and therefore are not applicable in the context of a redesignation of an area from unclassifiable to unclassifiable/attainment. \4\ See Memorandum from John Calcagni, Director, EPA Air Quality Management Division, entitled ``Procedures for Processing Requests to Redesignate Areas to Attainment'' (September 4, 1992). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- III. What is EPA's rationale for proposing to redesignate the area? In order to redesignate the Area from unclassifiable to unclassifiable/attainment for the 2012 primary annual PM2.5 NAAQS, the 3-year average of annual arithmetic mean concentrations (i.e., design value) over the most recent 3-year period must be less than or equal to 12.0 [micro]g/m\3\ at all monitoring sites in the Area over the full 3-year period, as determined in accordance with 40 CFR 50.18 and Appendix N of Part 50. EPA reviewed PM2.5 monitoring data from monitoring stations in the bi-state Louisville Area for the 2012 primary annual PM2.5 NAAQS for the 3-year period from 2014-2016. These data have been quality-assured, certified, and recorded in AQS by Kentucky and Indiana, and the monitoring locations have not changed during the monitoring period. As summarized in Table 1, the design values for all monitors in the Area for the 2014-2016 period are below the 2012 primary annual PM2.5 NAAQS. Table 1--2012 Annual PM2.5 Design Values for Monitors in the Bi-State Louisville Area for 2014-2016 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2014-2016 design County Monitoring value site ([mu]g/m3) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Clark County, IN.............................. 180190006 10.6 180190008 8.7 Floyd County, IN.............................. 180431004 9.3 [[Page 24716]] Jefferson County, KY.......................... 211110043 10.4 211110051 10.3 211110067 9.5 211110075 10.4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Because the 3-year design values, based on complete, quality- assured data, demonstrate that the Area meets the 2012 primary annual PM2.5 standard, EPA is proposing to redesignate the Kentucky portion of the Louisville Area from unclassifiable to unclassifiable/ attainment for this NAAQS.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ The State of Indiana has not yet submitted a redesignation request for its portion of the Louisville Area. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IV. Proposed Action EPA is proposing to approve Kentucky's May 4, 2018, request to redesignate the Kentucky portion of the bi-state Louisville Area from unclassifiable to unclassifiable/attainment for the 2012 primary annual PM2.5 NAAQS. If finalized, approval of the redesignation request would change the legal designation, found at 40 CFR part 81, of the portion of Bullitt County located in the Area and Jefferson County, Kentucky, from unclassifiable to unclassifiable/attainment for the 2012 primary annual PM2.5 NAAQS. V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, redesignation of an area to unclassifiable/ attainment is an action that affects the status of a geographical area and does not impose any additional regulatory requirements on sources beyond those imposed by state law. A redesignation to unclassifiable/ attainment does not in and of itself create any new requirements. Accordingly, this proposed action merely proposes to redesignate an area to unclassifiable/attainment and does not impose additional requirements. For that reason, this proposed action:Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because redesignations are exempted under Executive Order 12866; Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and Will not have disproportionate human health or environmental effects under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). The proposed action is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81 Environmental protection, Air pollution control. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq. Dated: May 15, 2018. Onis ``Trey'' Glenn, III, Regional Administrator, Region 4. [FR Doc. 2018-11567 Filed 5-29-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![24714 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 104 / Wednesday, May 30, 2018 / Proposed Rules
that has acceded to the Trademark Law (8) If the subsequent designation is Kentucky’s request and redesignate the
Treaty, but not to the Singapore Treaty filed through TEAS, the subsequent Area to unclassifiable/attainment for the
on the Law of Trademarks, the designation fees (see § 7.7). 2012 primary annual PM2.5 NAAQS
requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b) of * * * * * based upon complete, quality-assured,
this section do not apply. ■ 30. Amend § 7.25 by revising and certified ambient air monitoring
(d) If TEAS is unavailable, or in an paragraph (a) to read as follows: data showing that the PM2.5 monitors in
extraordinary situation, an applicant or the bi-state Louisville Area are in
registrant under this section who is § 7.25 Sections of part 2 applicable to compliance with the 2012 primary
required to file a submission through extension of protection. annual PM2.5 NAAQS.
TEAS may submit a petition to the (a) Except for §§ 2.21, 2.22, 2.76, 2.88, DATES: Comments must be received on
Director under § 2.146(a)(5) and (c) of 2.89, 2.130, 2.131, 2.160 through 2.166, or before June 29, 2018.
this chapter to accept the submission 2.168, 2.173, 2.175, 2.181 through 2.186, ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
filed on paper. 2.197, and 2.198, all sections in parts 2 identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
■ 28. Amend § 7.11 by revising the and 11 of this chapter shall apply to an OAR–2017–0390 at http://
introductory text to paragraph (a), extension of protection of an www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
(a)(10), and (a)(11), and removing international registration to the United instructions for submitting comments.
paragraph (a)(12) to read as follows: States, including sections related to Once submitted, comments cannot be
proceedings before the Trademark Trial edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
§ 7.11 Requirements for international
application originating from the United and Appeal Board, unless otherwise EPA may publish any comment received
States. stated. to its public docket. Do not submit
(a) The Office will grant a date of * * * * * electronically any information you
receipt to an international application Dated: May 21, 2018. consider to be Confidential Business
that is filed through TEAS in Information (CBI) or other information
Andrei Iancu,
accordance with § 7.4(a), or typed on the whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual
official paper form issued by the Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
Property and Director of the United States
International Bureau, if permitted under Patent and Trademark Office. etc.) must be accompanied by a written
§ 7.4(c) or accepted on petition pursuant comment. The written comment is
[FR Doc. 2018–11353 Filed 5–29–18; 8:45 am]
to § 7.4(d). The international application considered the official comment and
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
must include all of the following: should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. EPA will generally
* * * * *
(10) If the application is filed through not consider comments or comment
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION contents located outside of the primary
TEAS, the international application fees AGENCY
for all classes, and the fees for all submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
designated Contracting Parties other file sharing system). For
40 CFR Part 81 additional submission methods, the full
identified in the international
application (see § 7.7); and [EPA–R04–OAR–2017–0390; FRL–9978–59– EPA public comment policy,
(11) A statement that the applicant is Region 4] information about CBI or multimedia
entitled to file an international submissions, and general guidance on
Air Plan Approval and Air Quality making effective comments, please visit
application in the Office, specifying that Designation; KY; Redesignation of the
applicant: is a national of the United http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
Kentucky Portion of the Louisville commenting-epa-dockets.
States; has a domicile in the United Unclassifiable Area
States; or has a real and effective FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
industrial or commercial establishment AGENCY: Environmental Protection Madolyn Sanchez, Air Regulatory
in the United States. Where an Agency. Management Section, in the Air
applicant’s address is not in the United ACTION: Proposed rule.
Planning and Implementation Branch,
States, the applicant must provide the Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
address of its U.S. domicile or SUMMARY: On May 4, 2018, the Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
establishment. Commonwealth of Kentucky, through Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street,
* * * * * the Kentucky Energy and Environment SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
■ 29. Amend § 7.21 by revising the Cabinet, Division for Air Quality Madolyn Sanchez may be reached by
introductory text to paragraph (b), (b)(7), (KDAQ), submitted a request for the phone at (404) 562–9644 or via
and (b)(8), and removing paragraph Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) electronic mail at sanchez.madolyn@
(b)(9) to read as follows: to redesignate the portion of Kentucky epa.gov.
that is within the bi-state Louisville, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
§ 7.21 Subsequent designation. KY-IN fine particulate matter (PM2.5)
* * * * * unclassifiable area (hereinafter referred I. Background
(b) The Office will grant a date of to as the ‘‘bi-state Louisville Area’’ or The Clean Air Act (CAA or Act)
receipt to a subsequent designation that ‘‘Area’’) to unclassifiable/attainment for establishes a process for air quality
is filed through TEAS in accordance the 2012 primary annual PM2.5 national management through the establishment
with § 7.4(a), or typed on the official ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). and implementation of the NAAQS.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
paper form issued by the International The bi-state Louisville Area consists of After the promulgation of a new or
Bureau, if permitted under § 7.4(c) or Jefferson County and a portion of Bullitt revised NAAQS, EPA is required to
accepted on petition pursuant to County in Kentucky as well as Clark and designate areas, pursuant to section
§ 7.4(d). The subsequent designation Floyd Counties in Indiana. EPA now has 107(d)(1) of the CAA, as attainment,
must contain all of the following: sufficient data to determine that the bi- nonattainment, or unclassifiable. On
* * * * * state Louisville Area is in attainment of December 14, 2012, EPA revised the
(7) The U.S. transmittal fee required the 2012 primary annual PM2.5 NAAQS. primary annual NAAQS for PM2.5 at a
by § 7.6; and Therefore, EPA is proposing to approve level of 12 micrograms per cubic meter
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:20 May 29, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30MYP1.SGM 30MYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_24818/page/1.svg)
![24716 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 104 / Wednesday, May 30, 2018 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1—2012 ANNUAL PM2.5 DE- V. Statutory and Executive Order Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
SIGN VALUES FOR MONITORS IN THE Reviews 1999);
BI-STATE LOUISVILLE AREA FOR Under the CAA, redesignation of an • Is not an economically significant
2014–2016—Continued area to unclassifiable/attainment is an regulatory action based on health or
action that affects the status of a safety risks subject to Executive Order
2014–2016 geographical area and does not impose 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
Monitoring design any additional regulatory requirements
County site value • Is not a significant regulatory action
(μg/m3)
on sources beyond those imposed by subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
state law. A redesignation to 28355, May 22, 2001);
Jefferson Coun- unclassifiable/attainment does not in
• Is not subject to requirements of
ty, KY ............ 211110043 10.4 and of itself create any new
211110051 10.3 requirements. Accordingly, this section 12(d) of the National
211110067 9.5 proposed action merely proposes to Technology Transfer and Advancement
211110075 10.4 redesignate an area to unclassifiable/ Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
attainment and does not impose application of those requirements would
Because the 3-year design values, additional requirements. For that be inconsistent with the CAA; and
based on complete, quality-assured data, reason, this proposed action: • Will not have disproportionate
demonstrate that the Area meets the • Is not a significant regulatory action human health or environmental effects
2012 primary annual PM2.5 standard, subject to review by the Office of under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR
EPA is proposing to redesignate the Management and Budget under 7629, February 16, 1994).
Kentucky portion of the Louisville Area Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, The proposed action is not approved
from unclassifiable to unclassifiable/ October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, to apply on any Indian reservation land
attainment for this NAAQS.5 January 21, 2011); or in any other area where EPA or an
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
IV. Proposed Action
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
EPA is proposing to approve action because redesignations are Indian country, the rule does not have
Kentucky’s May 4, 2018, request to exempted under Executive Order 12866; tribal implications as specified by
redesignate the Kentucky portion of the • Does not impose an information
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
bi-state Louisville Area from collection burden under the provisions
November 9, 2000), nor will it impose
unclassifiable to unclassifiable/ of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); substantial direct costs on tribal
attainment for the 2012 primary annual
• Is certified as not having a governments or preempt tribal law.
PM2.5 NAAQS. If finalized, approval of
the redesignation request would change significant economic impact on a List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81
the legal designation, found at 40 CFR substantial number of small entities
part 81, of the portion of Bullitt County under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 Environmental protection, Air
located in the Area and Jefferson U.S.C. 601 et seq.); pollution control.
County, Kentucky, from unclassifiable • Does not contain any unfunded Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
to unclassifiable/attainment for the 2012 mandate or significantly or uniquely Dated: May 15, 2018.
primary annual PM2.5 NAAQS. affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Onis ‘‘Trey’’ Glenn, III,
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); Regional Administrator, Region 4.
5 The State of Indiana has not yet submitted a
redesignation request for its portion of the • Does not have Federalism [FR Doc. 2018–11567 Filed 5–29–18; 8:45 am]
Louisville Area. implications as specified in Executive BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:20 May 29, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\30MYP1.SGM 30MYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_24818/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-05-30 01:01:43
Document Modified: 2018-05-30 01:01:43
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Comments must be received on or before June 29, 2018. | |
| Contact | Madolyn Sanchez, Air Regulatory Management Section, in the Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Madolyn Sanchez may be reached by phone at (404) 562-9644 or via electronic mail at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 24714 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection and Air Pollution Control |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR