83 FR 24747 - Improving the Quality and Accuracy of Broadband Availability Data

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Telecommunications and Information Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 104 (May 30, 2018)

Page Range		24747-24749
FR Document		2018-11483

The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), on behalf of the Department of Commerce (Department), is requesting comment on actions that can be taken to improve the quality and accuracy of broadband availability data, particularly in rural areas, as part of the activities directed by Congress in the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2018. Through this Request for Comments (RFC), NTIA seeks input from a broad range of interested stakeholders--including private industry; academia; federal, state, and local government; not-for-profits; and other stakeholders with an interest in broadband availability--on ways to improve the nation's ability to analyze broadband availability, with the intention of identifying gaps in broadband availability that can be used to improve policymaking and inform public investments.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 104 (Wednesday, May 30, 2018)

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 30, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24747-24749]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-11483]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Telecommunications and Information Administration

[Docket No. 180427421-8421-01]
RIN 0660-XC042


Improving the Quality and Accuracy of Broadband Availability Data

AGENCY: National Telecommunications and Information Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce

[[Page 24748]]


ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Telecommunications and Information Administration 
(NTIA), on behalf of the Department of Commerce (Department), is 
requesting comment on actions that can be taken to improve the quality 
and accuracy of broadband availability data, particularly in rural 
areas, as part of the activities directed by Congress in the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2018. Through this Request for 
Comments (RFC), NTIA seeks input from a broad range of interested 
stakeholders--including private industry; academia; federal, state, and 
local government; not-for-profits; and other stakeholders with an 
interest in broadband availability--on ways to improve the nation's 
ability to analyze broadband availability, with the intention of 
identifying gaps in broadband availability that can be used to improve 
policymaking and inform public investments.

DATES: Comments are due on or before 5 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on 
July 16, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted by email to 
[email protected]. Written comments may also be submitted by mail 
to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Room 4887, Attn: 
Douglas Kinkoph, Associate Administrator, Washington, DC 20230. For 
more instructions about submitting comments, see the ``Instructions for 
Commenters'' section of SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andy Spurgeon, tel.: (720) 389-4900, 
email: [email protected], or Tim Moyer, tel.: (202) 482-6423, 
email: [email protected], National Telecommunications and Information 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Room 4725, Washington, DC 20230. Please direct media inquiries to 
NTIA's Office of Public Affairs, (202) 482-7002, or at 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Background: Broadband connectivity is essential to the nation's 
economic growth and social advancement. It is the conduit for economic 
and social opportunities for U.S. households and a gateway to increased 
productivity, growth and market access for businesses of all sizes, yet 
many American businesses, households and critical anchor institutions 
lack sufficient broadband availability. Using its current definition of 
broadband (25 Mbps downstream/3 Mbps upstream), Federal Communications 
Commission (FCC) data show that approximately 8 percent of Americans 
lived in places where fixed terrestrial broadband service was 
unavailable by the end of 2016. This data also demonstrates that there 
continued to be a significant disparity across America, with more than 
30 percent of rural Americans and approximately 35 percent of those 
living on Tribal lands lacking broadband availability, compared to 2 
percent of Americans living in urban areas.\1\ Many businesses, schools 
and libraries in rural and Tribal areas are insufficiently served or 
cannot afford the network transmission speed required to support 
multiple users of bandwidth-intensive applications. Knowing where the 
persistent gaps in broadband exist is crucial to enabling more 
efficient and effective investments in broadband infrastructure from 
both the public and private sectors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Federal Communications Commission 2018 Broadband Progress 
Report. See https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-18-10A1.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NTIA, in collaboration with the FCC, pioneered the collection of 
extensive broadband deployment data when it launched the State 
Broadband Initiative (SBI) in 2009. Through this program, NTIA worked 
with every state, territory, and the District of Columbia to collect 
fixed and mobile broadband availability data for over 11 million Census 
blocks every six months for five years. To make these data accessible 
to a broad audience, NTIA launched the National Broadband Map (NBM) in 
2011. Although the SBI program ended in 2015, NTIA continues its 
extensive work to collect, analyze, and disseminate data relevant to 
broadband availability and adoption.
    Presently, the only source of nationwide broadband availability 
data is that collected from broadband service provider responses to the 
FCC Form 477 Fixed Broadband Deployment data process. Form 477 data are 
submitted by voice and broadband telecommunications service providers 
semi-annually and include information on services each provider offers, 
at the Census block level.\2\ While the Census block system provides a 
very high level of geographic granularity overall--the United States is 
divided into over 11 million blocks, 95 percent of which do not exceed 
1 square mile in land area--it is possible that broadband availability 
may vary within a single block, particularly if it is geographically 
larger (which is most common in rural areas). A provider offering 
service to any homes or businesses in a Census block is instructed to 
report that block as served in its Form 477 filing, even though it may 
not offer broadband services in most of the block. This can lead to 
overstatements in the level of broadband availability, especially in 
rural areas where Census blocks are large.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ ``All facilities-based broadband providers are required to 
file data with the FCC twice a year (Form 477) on where they offer 
internet access service at speeds exceeding 200 kbps in at least one 
direction.'' See https://www.fcc.gov/general/broadband-deployment-data-fcc-form-477.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Moreover, there is no independent validation or verification 
process for Form 477 data service providers to submit to the FCC. While 
NTIA believes that the Form 477 data program is impressively large and 
useful, and benefits broadband policy research and decision-making, as 
well as the FCC's internal needs, NTIA also believes that the Form 477 
data collection program suffers from issues with data accuracy.
    Recognizing the deficiencies of the current broadband data 
collection process, Congress directed NTIA to update the national 
broadband availability map in coordination with the FCC and use 
partnerships previously developed with the states. Unlike the SBI 
program, in which NTIA worked with the states to collect and validate 
broadband availability data independent from the FCC's Form 477 data 
collection process, this is not a new program to fund the primary 
collection of broadband availability or subscription data, nor to fund 
specific data collection activities by states or third parties. Rather, 
Congress directed NTIA to acquire and display available third-party 
data sets to the extent it is able to negotiate inclusion to augment 
data from the FCC, other federal government agencies, state government, 
and the private sector. The objective of these updates is to identify 
regions of the country with insufficient broadband capacity, 
particularly in rural areas.
    NTIA is well-suited to perform this task. It has extensive 
experience collecting data on broadband adoption and usage in the 
United States, creating decades of datasets that complement the Form 
477 data collections on broadband deployment and subscription. Since 
1994, NTIA has partnered with the Census Bureau (Census) to survey 
approximately 53,000 U.S. households on their internet and computer 
use. NTIA's questionnaire, administered as a supplement to Census's 
Current Population Survey (CPS), includes more than 50 questions to 
gather a wealth of information on household and individual internet use 
and

[[Page 24749]]

demographics, including the locations, technologies, and devices that 
people use to go online, their online activities, and the reasons why 
some Americans still do not utilize these technologies. Whereas Form 
477 focuses on broadband availability and subscription data gathered 
from service providers, NTIA's CPS Supplements provide detailed 
information on adoption and usage of the internet, as reported by 
households across the country. The NTIA surveys, together with the 
FCC's Form 477 and three household broadband adoption questions on the 
American Community Survey, comprise a valuable, holistic set of federal 
data sources related to broadband.
    NTIA issues this RFC to solicit informed recommendations and 
feedback on sources of broadband availability data, mechanisms to 
validate broadband availability data using multiple data sources or new 
techniques, and approaches to leverage such data and techniques to 
inform broadband planning at the state and national levels by promoting 
the most efficient use of state or federal funding to areas that are 
insufficiently served by broadband.
    Request for Comments: NTIA invites comment on the full range of 
issues that may be presented by this inquiry, including issues that are 
not specifically raised in the questions below. Commenters are 
encouraged to address any or all of the questions below. Comments that 
contain references to studies, research, and other empirical data that 
are not widely published should include copies of the referenced 
materials with the submitted comments.
    1. Identifying additional broadband availability data:
    a. What additional data on broadband availability are available 
from federal, state, not-for-profit, academic, or private-sector 
sources to augment the FCC Form 477 data set?
    b. What obstacles--such as concerns about the quality, scope, or 
format of the data, as well as contractual, confidentiality, or data 
privacy concerns--might prevent the collaborative use of such data?
    2. Technology type, service areas, and bandwidth: Please consider 
providing a table or spreadsheet attachment when responding to question 
2, if needed.
    a. For each broadband availability data source, please define the 
specific broadband technologies (e.g., wireline, cable, fixed wireless, 
satellite, multiple sources, etc.) included in the data set. Please 
explain the service areas or geographic scope of the data set (e.g., 
Census block, county, cable franchises, publicly funded service areas, 
etc.) and describe how records from the data set could be matched with 
records from Form 477 data.
    b. Describe how frequently the data set is updated and the 
methodology used for collection and what measures are employed to 
validate or otherwise ensure the data is accurate. Please explain 
whether the data set differentiates between subscribed bandwidth and 
maximum available speeds.
    c. For each data set, please provide the name(s) and type(s) of 
entity that collects the data.
    d. Finally, please specify the format of the data (e.g., CSV, 
specific database, specific Geographic Information System (GIS) format, 
etc.)
    3. New approaches: Are there new approaches, tools, technologies, 
or methodologies that could be used to capture broadband availability 
data, particularly in rural areas?
    4. Validating broadband availability data:
    a. What methodologies, policies, standards, or technologies can be 
implemented to validate and compare various broadband availability data 
sources and identify and address conflicts between them?
    b. Do examples or studies of such validation exist?
    c. What thresholds or benchmarks should be taken into account when 
validating broadband availability, such as bandwidth, latency, 
geographic coverage, technology type, etc.? How can conformance to such 
standards be used to evaluate the accuracy of broadband data sets? How 
could those standards be used to improve policymaking, program 
management, or research in broadband-related fields?
    5. Identifying gaps in broadband availability:
    a. What data improvements can the government implement to better 
identify areas with insufficient broadband capacity?
    b. What other inputs should NTIA seek to inform data-driven 
broadband policy- and decision-making?
    Instructions for Commenters: Comments submitted by email should be 
machine-readable and should not be copy-protected. Comments submitted 
by mail may be in hard copy (paper) or electronic (on CD-ROM or disk). 
Responders should include the name of the person or organization filing 
the comment, as well as a page number on each page of their 
submissions. All comments received are a part of the public record and 
will generally be posted on the NTIA website, https://www.ntia.doc.gov, 
without change. All personal identifying information (for example, 
name, address) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly 
accessible. Do not submit confidential business information or 
otherwise sensitive or protected information. NTIA will accept 
anonymous comments.

    Dated: May 23, 2018.
David J. Redl,
Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information.
[FR Doc. 2018-11483 Filed 5-29-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-60-P

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 104 / Wednesday, May 30, 2018 / Notices 24747

Suspension of Liquidation States by TSCL in any other producer/ Dated: May 23, 2018.
In accordance with section exporter combinations or by third Gary Taverman,
735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, Commerce will parties that sourced subject Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
instruct U.S. Customs and Border merchandise from the excluded and Countervailing Duty Operations
producer/exporter combination. performing the non-exclusive functions and
Protection (CBP) to continue to suspend duties of the Assistant Secretary for
liquidation of all appropriate entries of These suspension of liquidation
Enforcement and Compliance.
fine denier PSF from Taiwan as instructions will remain in effect until
described in Appendix I of this notice, further notice. Appendix I—Scope of the Investigation
which were entered, or withdrawn from Disclosure The merchandise covered by this
warehouse, for consumption on or after investigation is fine denier polyester staple
January 5, 2018, the date of publication Commerce intends to disclose to fiber (fine denier PSF), not carded or combed,
of the Preliminary Determination of this interested parties its calculations and measuring less than 3.3 decitex (3 denier) in
investigation in the Federal Register. analysis performed in this final diameter. The scope covers all fine denier
Further, pursuant to section 735(c)(1)(B) determination within five days of any PSF, whether coated or uncoated. The
public announcement or, if there is no following products are excluded from the
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(d),
public announcement, within five days scope:
Commerce will instruct CBP to require (1) PSF equal to or greater than 3.3 decitex
a cash deposit equal to the estimated of the date of publication of this notice
(more than 3 denier, inclusive) currently
weighted-average dumping margin or in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). classifiable under Harmonized Tariff
the estimated all-others rate, as follows: International Trade Commission Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
(1) The cash deposit rate for the Notification subheadings 5503.20.0045 and 5503.20.0065.
respondents listed above will be equal (2) Low-melt PSF defined as a bi-
to the respondent-specific estimated In accordance with section 735(d) of component polyester fiber having a polyester
the Act, Commerce will notify the fiber component that melts at a lower
weighted-average dumping margins
International Trade Commission (ITC) of temperature than the other polyester fiber
determined in this final determination; component, which is currently classifiable
(2) if the exporter is not a respondent its final affirmative determination.
under HTSUS subheading 5503.20.0015.
identified above, but the producer is, Because the final determination in this Fine denier PSF is classifiable under the
then the cash deposit rate will be equal proceeding is affirmative, in accordance HTSUS subheading 5503.20.0025. Although
to the respondent-specific estimated with section 735(b)(2)(B) of the Act, the the HTSUS subheadings are provided for
weighted-average dumping margin ITC will make its final determination as convenience and customs purposes, the
established for that producer of the to whether the domestic industry in the written description of the scope of this
United States is materially injured, or investigation is dispositive.
subject merchandise, except as
explained below; and (3) the cash threatened with material injury, by Appendix II—List of Topics Discussed
deposit rate for all other producers and/ reason of imports of fine denier PSF in the Issues and Decision
or exporters will be equal to the all- from Taiwan no later than 45 days after Memorandum
others estimated weighted-average Commerce’s final determination. If the
ITC determines that material injury or I. Summary
dumping margin. II. List of Issues
Because the estimated weighted- threat of material injury does not exist,
III. Background
average dumping margin for TSCL is the proceeding will be terminated and IV. Scope of the Investigation
zero, entries of shipments of subject all securities posted will be refunded or V. Discussion of the Issues
merchandise both produced and canceled. If the ITC determines that Comment 1: Reported Costs for a Certain
exported by TSCL will not be subject to such injury does exist, Commerce will Product Control Number (CONNUM)
suspension of liquidation or cash issue an antidumping duty order Comment 1(a): Direct Material Costs
deposit requirements. In such directing CBP to assess, upon further Comment 1(b): Allocation of Labor and
situations, Commerce applies the instruction by Commerce, antidumping Overhead
duties on appropriate imports of the Comment 1(c): Market Price Methodology
exclusion to the provisional measures to for Grades B and C PSF
the producer/exporter combination that subject merchandise entered, or
Comment 1(d): Scrap Offset Calculation
was examined in the investigation. withdrawn from warehouse, for Comment 2: Factoring Agreement
Accordingly, Commerce is directing consumption on or after the effective Comment 3: Packing Cost
CBP to not suspend liquidation of date of the suspension of liquidation. Comment 4: Application of Partial Facts
entries of subject merchandise produced Available
Notification to Interested Parties
and exported by TSCL. Entries of VI. Recommendation
shipments of subject merchandise from This notice serves as a reminder to [FR Doc. 2018–11712 Filed 5–29–18; 8:45 am]
TSCL in any other producer/exporter parties subject to an administrative BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
combination, or by third parties that protective order (APO) of their
sourced subject merchandise from the responsibility concerning the
excluded producer/exporter disposition of proprietary information DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
combination, are subject to the disclosed under APO in accordance
provisional measures at the all-others with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely National Telecommunications and
rate. notification of the return or destruction Information Administration
Because the final estimated weighted- of APO materials, or conversion to [Docket No. 180427421–8421–01]
average dumping margin for subject judicial protective order, is hereby
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES

merchandise produced and exported by requested. Failure to comply with the RIN 0660–XC042
TSCL is zero, entries of shipments of regulations and the terms of an APO is
a violation subject to sanction. Improving the Quality and Accuracy of
subject merchandise from this producer/
Broadband Availability Data
exporter combination will be excluded This determination and this notice are
from the antidumping duty order. This issued and published pursuant to AGENCY: National Telecommunications
exclusion is not applicable to sections 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and Information Administration, U.S.
merchandise exported to the United and 19 CFR 351.210(c). Department of Commerce

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:04 May 29, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM 30MYN1

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 104 / Wednesday, May 30, 2018 / Notices 24749

demographics, including the locations, describe how records from the data set example, name, address) voluntarily
technologies, and devices that people could be matched with records from submitted by the commenter may be
use to go online, their online activities, Form 477 data. publicly accessible. Do not submit
and the reasons why some Americans b. Describe how frequently the data confidential business information or
still do not utilize these technologies. set is updated and the methodology otherwise sensitive or protected
Whereas Form 477 focuses on used for collection and what measures information. NTIA will accept
broadband availability and subscription are employed to validate or otherwise anonymous comments.
data gathered from service providers, ensure the data is accurate. Please Dated: May 23, 2018.
NTIA’s CPS Supplements provide explain whether the data set
David J. Redl,
detailed information on adoption and differentiates between subscribed
Assistant Secretary for Communications and
usage of the internet, as reported by bandwidth and maximum available
Information.
households across the country. The speeds.
[FR Doc. 2018–11483 Filed 5–29–18; 8:45 am]
NTIA surveys, together with the FCC’s c. For each data set, please provide
Form 477 and three household the name(s) and type(s) of entity that BILLING CODE 3510–60–P

broadband adoption questions on the collects the data.
American Community Survey, comprise d. Finally, please specify the format of
a valuable, holistic set of federal data the data (e.g., CSV, specific database, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
sources related to broadband. specific Geographic Information System
NTIA issues this RFC to solicit (GIS) format, etc.) Department of the Army
informed recommendations and 3. New approaches: Are there new [Docket ID: USA–2018–HQ–0005]
feedback on sources of broadband approaches, tools, technologies, or
availability data, mechanisms to methodologies that could be used to Submission for OMB Review;
validate broadband availability data capture broadband availability data, Comment Request
using multiple data sources or new particularly in rural areas?
techniques, and approaches to leverage 4. Validating broadband availability AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.
such data and techniques to inform data: ACTION: 30-Day information collection
broadband planning at the state and a. What methodologies, policies, notice.
national levels by promoting the most standards, or technologies can be
efficient use of state or federal funding implemented to validate and compare SUMMARY: The Department of Defense
to areas that are insufficiently served by various broadband availability data has submitted to OMB for clearance the
broadband. sources and identify and address following proposal for collection of
Request for Comments: NTIA invites conflicts between them? information under the provisions of the
comment on the full range of issues that b. Do examples or studies of such Paperwork Reduction Act.
may be presented by this inquiry, validation exist? DATES: Consideration will be given to all
including issues that are not specifically c. What thresholds or benchmarks comments received by June 29, 2018.
raised in the questions below. should be taken into account when ADDRESSES: Comments and
Commenters are encouraged to address validating broadband availability, such recommendations on the proposed
any or all of the questions below. as bandwidth, latency, geographic information collection should be
Comments that contain references to coverage, technology type, etc.? How emailed to Ms. Jasmeet Seehra, DoD
studies, research, and other empirical can conformance to such standards be Desk Officer, at oira_submission@
data that are not widely published used to evaluate the accuracy of omb.eop.gov. Please identify the
should include copies of the referenced broadband data sets? How could those proposed information collection by DoD
materials with the submitted comments. standards be used to improve Desk Officer, Docket ID number, and
1. Identifying additional broadband policymaking, program management, or title of the information collection.
availability data: research in broadband-related fields?
5. Identifying gaps in broadband FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred
a. What additional data on broadband
availability are available from federal, availability: Licari, 571–372–0493, or whs.mc-
state, not-for-profit, academic, or a. What data improvements can the alex.esd.mbx.dd-dod-information-
private-sector sources to augment the government implement to better identify collections@mail.mil.
FCC Form 477 data set? areas with insufficient broadband SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
b. What obstacles—such as concerns capacity? Title; Associated Form; and OMB
about the quality, scope, or format of the b. What other inputs should NTIA Number: Evaluation of Health Status of
data, as well as contractual, seek to inform data-driven broadband an Infantry Battalion Following
confidentiality, or data privacy policy- and decision-making? Deployment in Support of Operation
concerns—might prevent the Instructions for Commenters: Iraqi Freedom in 2004–2005; OMB
collaborative use of such data? Comments submitted by email should Control Number 0702–XXXX.
2. Technology type, service areas, and be machine-readable and should not be Type of Request: New.
bandwidth: Please consider providing a copy-protected. Comments submitted by Number of Respondents: 3,500.
table or spreadsheet attachment when mail may be in hard copy (paper) or Responses per Respondent: 1.
responding to question 2, if needed. electronic (on CD–ROM or disk). Annual Responses: 3,500.
a. For each broadband availability Responders should include the name of Average Burden per Response: 1
data source, please define the specific the person or organization filing the Hour.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES

broadband technologies (e.g., wireline, comment, as well as a page number on Annual Burden Hours: 3,500.
cable, fixed wireless, satellite, multiple each page of their submissions. All Needs and Uses: The information
sources, etc.) included in the data set. comments received are a part of the collection requirement is necessary to
Please explain the service areas or public record and will generally be assess and evaluate the self-reported
geographic scope of the data set (e.g., posted on the NTIA website, https:// post-deployment health status of
Census block, county, cable franchises, www.ntia.doc.gov, without change. All selected soldiers who operated in the
publicly funded service areas, etc.) and personal identifying information (for vicinity of Mosul, Iraq in 2004 (e.g.,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:04 May 29, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM 30MYN1

Document Created: 2018-05-30 01:01:57
Document Modified: 2018-05-30 01:01:57

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Action		Notice and request for comments.
Dates		Comments are due on or before 5 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on July 16, 2018.
Contact		Andy Spurgeon, tel.: (720) 389-4900, email: [email protected], or Tim Moyer, tel.: (202) 482-6423, email: [email protected], National Telecommunications and Information Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Room 4725, Washington, DC 20230. Please direct media inquiries to NTIA's Office of Public Affairs, (202) 482-7002, or at [email protected]
FR Citation		83 FR 24747
RIN Number		0660-XC04

83 FR 24747 - Improving the Quality and Accuracy of Broadband Availability Data

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCENational Telecommunications and Information Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 104 (May 30, 2018)

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Telecommunications and Information Administration