83 FR 24940 - Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; Continuous Opacity Monitoring Requirements for Municipal Waste Combustors
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 105 (May 31, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 105 (May 31, 2018)
| Page Range | 24940-24941 | |
| FR Document | 2018-11746 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 105 (Thursday, May 31, 2018)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 24940-24941] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-11746] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 62 [EPA-R03-OAR-2017-0484; FRL-9978-56--Region 3] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; Continuous Opacity Monitoring Requirements for Municipal Waste Combustors AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final action to approve a revision to the State of Maryland's Clean Air Act (CAA) sections 111(d) and 129 State Plan for municipal waste combustors (MWCs). The revision reflects amendments to Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR) 26.11.08.08, which update the MWC opacity compliance provisions. The Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE)'s revised regulations provide that quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) requirements for continuous opacity monitors (COMs) are found in COMAR 26.11.31, rather than the now discontinued Technical Memorandum (TM 90-01). EPA is approving this revision to Maryland's CAA sections 111(d) and 129 State Plan in accordance with the requirements of the CAA. DATES: This rule is effective on July 2, 2018. ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-2017-0484. All documents in the docket are listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability information. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: Emily Linn, (215) 814-5273, or by email at [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background On May 10, 2016, the State of Maryland submitted a formal revision (MD Submittal #16-05) to its CAA sections 111(d) and 129 State Plan for MWCs. The revision contains Maryland's amendments to COMAR 26.11.08.08, ``Requirements for an Existing Large MWC with a Capacity Greater Than 250 Tons Per Day.'' Among other minor changes,\1\ these amendments update the references for opacity compliance which previously referenced a discontinued technical memorandum, TM 90-01, that addressed QA/QC procedures for COMs. COMAR 26.11.08.08 now refers to COMAR 26.11.31, which contains QA and QC procedures for COMs, similar to those previously found in the no longer effective TM 90-01.\2\ EPA is approving this revision to Maryland's 111(d) and 129 State Plan for MWCs in accordance with the requirements of the CAA for sections 111(d) and 129 state plans. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Other changes made by Maryland to COMAR 26.11.08.08 include (1) changing the ``Emission Standards for a Large MWC'' to read ``10 percent opacity with COMS,'' rather than ``10 percent opacity with CEMS,'' and (2) changing the ``Performance and Compliance Test Requirements'' to include the following statement: ``. . . the Department may determine compliance and non-compliance with the visible emission limitations by performing EPA reference Method 9 observations based on a 6 minute block average'' (formerly, it included the following statement: ``In case of inconsistencies in data or conflicting data Method 9 results will determine compliance''). \2\ EPA previously approved Maryland's State Plan for large MWCs on April 8, 2008 (see 73 FR 18968). EPA also approved, as a revision to the Maryland state implementation plan, the regulatory requirements for QA/QC controls for COMs in COMAR 26.11.31 on November 7, 2016 (see 81 FR 78048). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the same state rulemaking action, MDE also revised the title of COMAR 26.11.08.07, from ``Requirements for Certain Municipal Waste Combustors'' to ``Requirements for Municipal Waste Combustors with a Capacity of 35 tons or greater per day and less than or equal to 250 Tons Per Day,'' to clarify that the state regulation applies to small MWCs. The text of 26.11.08.07 remains unchanged, and thus the requirements for MWCs remain unchanged. This clarification to the title of COMAR 26.11.08.07 is a minor administrative change and is not part of this action. On November 6, 2017 (82 FR 51380 and 82 FR 51350), EPA simultaneously published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) and a direct final rule (DFR) for the State of Maryland approving revisions to its CAA sections 111(d) and 129 State Plan for MWCs. EPA received an adverse comment on the rulemaking and withdrew the DFR prior to the effective date on December 26, 2017 (82 FR 60872). In this rulemaking, EPA is responding to the comment submitted on the proposed approval of the State Plan revisions and is approving the revisions to Maryland's State Plan for MWCs. II. State Submittal and EPA Analysis EPA has reviewed Maryland's submittal to revise its State Plan for MWCs in the context of the requirements of 40 CFR part 60, subparts Cb and Eb. In this action, EPA is finalizing its determination that the submitted revision meets the above-cited requirements. EPA is amending 40 CFR part 62, subpart V (40 CFR 62.5110 and 62.5112), to reflect this approval. III. Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA received one adverse comment on the proposed approval of the revisions to the State of Maryland's CAA sections 111(d) and 129 State Plan for MWCs. All other comments received were either supportive of or not specific to this action and thus are not addressed here. Comment: The commenter asserts that EPA should not be involved in matters of the state's choosing. Additionally, the commenter asserts that if the changes to the plan are largely administrative in nature, EPA should let the state go without making them spend resources to make that administrative change. Response: EPA disagrees with the commenter's assertions. EPA did not specifically direct Maryland to make these amendments. Instead, Maryland submitted to EPA this revision to its State Plan for MWCs and requested that EPA amend the appropriate sections of 40 CFR part 62, subpart V, to reflect approval of this Plan revision. EPA is required to act on State Plan revisions submitted by states. In response to the commenter's assertion, while these changes are largely administrative in [[Page 24941]] nature, they are needed to update Maryland's State Plan for COMs requirements. EPA is responding to MDE's request and finalizing the revisions to Maryland's State Plan for MWCs in this action, as they are consistent with CAA sections 111(d) and 129. IV. Final Action In this final action, EPA is amending 40 CFR part 62, subpart V, to reflect the receipt and approval of the revisions to Maryland's State Plan for MWCs in accordance with the requirements of the CAA. V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews A. General Requirements Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)). This action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). This rule also does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it merely approves a state rule implementing a Federal requirement, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the CAA. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it approves a state rule implementing a Federal standard. Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 provides, in part, that Federal agencies shall use technical standards that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. Public Law 104-113 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) (March 7, 1996). Agencies are not required to use such standards if doing so would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. Public Law 104-113 (section 12(d)). EPA is not, in this action, using technical standards, as contemplated by the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act. Rather, EPA is reviewing and responding to Maryland's Section 111(d)/129 plan submission, and, in such case, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Moreover, in such context, EPA has no authority to disapprove a Section 111(d)/129 plan submission for failure to use voluntary consensus standards, and it would be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a Section 111(d)/129 plan submission, to require use of such standards in place of a Section 111(d)/129 plan submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act does not require, here, the use of voluntary consensus standards. This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). C. Petitions for Judicial Review Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 30, 2018. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action approving Maryland's revisions to their 111(d) and 129 State Plan for MWCs may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides. Dated: May 15, 2018. Cosmo Servidio, Regional Administrator, Region III. For the reasons stated in the preamble, title 40 CFR part 62 is amended as follows: PART 62--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF STATE PLANS FOR DESIGNATED FACILITIES AND POLLUTANTS 0 1. The authority citation for part 62 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart V--Maryland 0 2. Section 62.5110 is amended by adding paragraph (c) to read as follows: Sec. 62.5110 Identification of plan. * * * * * (c) On May 10, 2016, Maryland submitted a revised State Plan and related COMAR 26.11.08.08 amendments. 0 3. Section 62.5112 is amended by adding paragraph (c) to read as follows: Sec. 62.5112 Effective date. * * * * * (c) The plan revision is effective July 30, 2018. [FR Doc. 2018-11746 Filed 5-30-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![24940 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 105 / Thursday, May 31, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION some information is not publicly or greater per day and less than or equal
AGENCY available, e.g., confidential business to 250 Tons Per Day,’’ to clarify that the
information (CBI) or other information state regulation applies to small MWCs.
40 CFR Part 52 whose disclosure is restricted by statute. The text of 26.11.08.07 remains
Certain other material, such as unchanged, and thus the requirements
Approval and Promulgation of copyrighted material, is not placed on for MWCs remain unchanged. This
Implementation Plans the internet and will be publicly clarification to the title of COMAR
CFR Correction available only in hard copy form. 26.11.08.07 is a minor administrative
Publicly available docket materials are change and is not part of this action.
■ In Title 40 of the Code of Federal available through https:// On November 6, 2017 (82 FR 51380
Regulations, Part 52, § 52.2020 to End, www.regulations.gov, or please contact and 82 FR 51350), EPA simultaneously
revised as of July 1, 2017, on page 17, the person identified in the FOR FURTHER published a notice of proposed
in § 52.2020, the table in paragraph INFORMATION CONTACT section for rulemaking (NPR) and a direct final rule
(c)(1) is amended by removing the additional availability information. (DFR) for the State of Maryland
entries for Chapter 130—Standards for FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: approving revisions to its CAA sections
Products, Subchapter A—Portable Fuel Emily Linn, (215) 814–5273, or by email 111(d) and 129 State Plan for MWCs.
Containers. at linn.emily@epa.gov. EPA received an adverse comment on
the rulemaking and withdrew the DFR
[FR Doc. 2018–11702 Filed 5–30–18; 8:45 am] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
prior to the effective date on December
BILLING CODE 1301–00–D 26, 2017 (82 FR 60872). In this
I. Background
On May 10, 2016, the State of rulemaking, EPA is responding to the
Maryland submitted a formal revision comment submitted on the proposed
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION approval of the State Plan revisions and
AGENCY (MD Submittal #16–05) to its CAA
sections 111(d) and 129 State Plan for is approving the revisions to Maryland’s
40 CFR Part 62 MWCs. The revision contains State Plan for MWCs.
[EPA–R03–OAR–2017–0484; FRL–9978– Maryland’s amendments to COMAR II. State Submittal and EPA Analysis
56—Region 3] 26.11.08.08, ‘‘Requirements for an EPA has reviewed Maryland’s
Existing Large MWC with a Capacity submittal to revise its State Plan for
Approval and Promulgation of Air Greater Than 250 Tons Per Day.’’ MWCs in the context of the
Quality Implementation Plans; Among other minor changes,1 these requirements of 40 CFR part 60,
Maryland; Continuous Opacity amendments update the references for subparts Cb and Eb. In this action, EPA
Monitoring Requirements for Municipal opacity compliance which previously is finalizing its determination that the
Waste Combustors referenced a discontinued technical submitted revision meets the above-
memorandum, TM 90–01, that cited requirements. EPA is amending 40
AGENCY: Environmental Protection addressed QA/QC procedures for COMs.
Agency (EPA). CFR part 62, subpart V (40 CFR 62.5110
COMAR 26.11.08.08 now refers to and 62.5112), to reflect this approval.
ACTION: Final rule. COMAR 26.11.31, which contains QA
and QC procedures for COMs, similar to III. Public Comments and EPA
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection those previously found in the no longer Responses
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to effective TM 90–01.2 EPA is approving
approve a revision to the State of EPA received one adverse comment
this revision to Maryland’s 111(d) and on the proposed approval of the
Maryland’s Clean Air Act (CAA) 129 State Plan for MWCs in accordance
sections 111(d) and 129 State Plan for revisions to the State of Maryland’s
with the requirements of the CAA for CAA sections 111(d) and 129 State Plan
municipal waste combustors (MWCs). sections 111(d) and 129 state plans.
The revision reflects amendments to for MWCs. All other comments received
In the same state rulemaking action, were either supportive of or not specific
Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR) MDE also revised the title of COMAR
26.11.08.08, which update the MWC to this action and thus are not addressed
26.11.08.07, from ‘‘Requirements for here.
opacity compliance provisions. The Certain Municipal Waste Combustors’’ Comment: The commenter asserts that
Maryland Department of the to ‘‘Requirements for Municipal Waste EPA should not be involved in matters
Environment (MDE)’s revised Combustors with a Capacity of 35 tons of the state’s choosing. Additionally, the
regulations provide that quality
commenter asserts that if the changes to
assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) 1 Other changes made by Maryland to COMAR
the plan are largely administrative in
requirements for continuous opacity 26.11.08.08 include (1) changing the ‘‘Emission
nature, EPA should let the state go
monitors (COMs) are found in COMAR Standards for a Large MWC’’ to read ‘‘10 percent
opacity with COMS,’’ rather than ‘‘10 percent without making them spend resources
26.11.31, rather than the now
opacity with CEMS,’’ and (2) changing the to make that administrative change.
discontinued Technical Memorandum ‘‘Performance and Compliance Test Requirements’’ Response: EPA disagrees with the
(TM 90–01). EPA is approving this to include the following statement: ‘‘. . . the commenter’s assertions. EPA did not
revision to Maryland’s CAA sections Department may determine compliance and non-
specifically direct Maryland to make
111(d) and 129 State Plan in accordance compliance with the visible emission limitations by
performing EPA reference Method 9 observations these amendments. Instead, Maryland
with the requirements of the CAA. based on a 6 minute block average’’ (formerly, it submitted to EPA this revision to its
DATES: This rule is effective on July 2, included the following statement: ‘‘In case of State Plan for MWCs and requested that
pmangrum on DSK30RV082PROD with RULES
2018. inconsistencies in data or conflicting data Method
9 results will determine compliance’’). EPA amend the appropriate sections of
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 2 EPA previously approved Maryland’s State Plan 40 CFR part 62, subpart V, to reflect
docket for this action under Docket ID for large MWCs on April 8, 2008 (see 73 FR 18968). approval of this Plan revision. EPA is
No. EPA–R03–OAR–2017–0484. All EPA also approved, as a revision to the Maryland required to act on State Plan revisions
state implementation plan, the regulatory
documents in the docket are listed on requirements for QA/QC controls for COMs in
submitted by states. In response to the
the https://www.regulations.gov COMAR 26.11.31 on November 7, 2016 (see 81 FR commenter’s assertion, while these
website. Although listed in the index, 78048). changes are largely administrative in
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:57 May 30, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\31MYR1.SGM 31MYR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_25045/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 105 / Thursday, May 31, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 24941
nature, they are needed to update power and responsibilities established C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Maryland’s State Plan for COMs in the CAA. This rule also is not subject
requirements. EPA is responding to to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
MDE’s request and finalizing the April 23, 1997), because it approves a petitions for judicial review of this
revisions to Maryland’s State Plan for state rule implementing a Federal action must be filed in the United States
MWCs in this action, as they are standard. Court of Appeals for the appropriate
consistent with CAA sections 111(d) Section 12(d) of the National circuit by July 30, 2018. Filing a petition
and 129. Technology Transfer and Advancement for reconsideration by the Administrator
Act of 1995 provides, in part, that of this final rule does not affect the
IV. Final Action
Federal agencies shall use technical finality of this action for the purposes of
In this final action, EPA is amending standards that are developed or adopted judicial review nor does it extend the
40 CFR part 62, subpart V, to reflect the by voluntary consensus standards time within which a petition for judicial
receipt and approval of the revisions to bodies. Public Law 104–113 (15 U.S.C. review may be filed, and shall not
Maryland’s State Plan for MWCs in 272 note) (March 7, 1996). Agencies are postpone the effectiveness of such rule
accordance with the requirements of the not required to use such standards if or action. This action approving
CAA. doing so would be inconsistent with Maryland’s revisions to their 111(d) and
V. Statutory and Executive Order applicable law or otherwise impractical. 129 State Plan for MWCs may not be
Reviews Public Law 104–113 (section 12(d)). challenged later in proceedings to
EPA is not, in this action, using enforce its requirements. (See section
A. General Requirements technical standards, as contemplated by 307(b)(2).)
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR the National Technology Transfer and
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is Advancement Act. Rather, EPA is List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and reviewing and responding to Maryland’s
Section 111(d)/129 plan submission, Environmental protection, Air
therefore is not subject to review by the
and, in such case, EPA’s role is to pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Office of Management and Budget. For
approve state choices, provided that Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211, they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That Act. Moreover, in such context, EPA has Reporting and recordkeeping
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, no authority to disapprove a Section requirements, Sulfur oxides.
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355 (May 111(d)/129 plan submission for failure Dated: May 15, 2018.
22, 2001)). This action merely approves to use voluntary consensus standards, Cosmo Servidio,
state law as meeting Federal and it would be inconsistent with
Regional Administrator, Region III.
requirements and imposes no additional applicable law for EPA, when it reviews
requirements beyond those imposed by a Section 111(d)/129 plan submission, For the reasons stated in the
state law. Accordingly, the to require use of such standards in place preamble, title 40 CFR part 62 is
Administrator certifies that this rule of a Section 111(d)/129 plan submission amended as follows:
will not have a significant economic that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
impact on a substantial number of small the Clean Air Act. Thus, the National PART 62—APPROVAL AND
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Technology Transfer and Advancement PROMULGATION OF STATE PLANS
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this Act does not require, here, the use of FOR DESIGNATED FACILITIES AND
rule approves pre-existing requirements voluntary consensus standards. POLLUTANTS
under state law and does not impose This rule does not impose an
any additional enforceable duty beyond information collection burden under the ■ 1. The authority citation for part 62
that required by state law, it does not provisions of the Paperwork Reduction continues to read as follows:
contain any unfunded mandate or Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
significantly or uniquely affect small
B. Submission to Congress and the
governments, as described in the Subpart V—Maryland
Comptroller General
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4). This rule also does not The Congressional Review Act, 5 ■ 2. Section 62.5110 is amended by
have a substantial direct effect on one or U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small adding paragraph (c) to read as follows:
more Indian tribes, on the relationship Business Regulatory Enforcement
between the Federal Government and Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides § 62.5110 Identification of plan.
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of that before a rule may take effect, the * * * * *
power and responsibilities between the agency promulgating the rule must
Federal Government and Indian tribes, submit a rule report, which includes a (c) On May 10, 2016, Maryland
as specified by Executive Order 13175 copy of the rule, to each House of the submitted a revised State Plan and
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor Congress and to the Comptroller General related COMAR 26.11.08.08
will it have substantial direct effects on of the United States. EPA will submit a amendments.
the States, on the relationship between report containing this action and other ■ 3. Section 62.5112 is amended by
the national government and the States, required information to the U.S. Senate, adding paragraph (c) to read as follows:
or on the distribution of power and the U.S. House of Representatives, and
pmangrum on DSK30RV082PROD with RULES
responsibilities among the various the Comptroller General of the United § 62.5112 Effective date.
levels of government, as specified in States prior to publication of the rule in * * * * *
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, the Federal Register. A major rule
August 10, 1999), because it merely cannot take effect until 60 days after it (c) The plan revision is effective July
approves a state rule implementing a is published in the Federal Register. 30, 2018.
Federal requirement, and does not alter This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as [FR Doc. 2018–11746 Filed 5–30–18; 8:45 am]
the relationship or the distribution of defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:57 May 30, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\31MYR1.SGM 31MYR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_25045/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2018-05-31 00:48:42
Document Modified: 2018-05-31 00:48:42
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | This rule is effective on July 2, 2018. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 24940 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Carbon Monoxide; Intergovernmental Relations; Lead; Nitrogen Dioxide; Particulate Matter; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Sulfur Oxides |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR