83 FR 25087 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation; Notice of Filing of Amendment No. 1 and Order Approving Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, Related to The Options Clearing Corporation's Trade Acceptance and Novation Rules
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 105 (May 31, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 105 (May 31, 2018)
| Page Range | 25087-25093 | |
| FR Document | 2018-11611 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 105 (Thursday, May 31, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 25087-25093] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-11611] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-83321; File No. SR-OCC-2018-007] Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation; Notice of Filing of Amendment No. 1 and Order Approving Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, Related to The Options Clearing Corporation's Trade Acceptance and Novation Rules May 24, 2018. On March 23, 2018, the Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ proposed rule change SR- OCC-2018-007. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on April 9, 2018.\3\ The Commission did not receive any comments on the proposed rule change. On April 19, 2018, OCC filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change.\4\ The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comment on Amendment No. 1 from interested persons and is approving the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. \3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82984 (April 3, 2018), 83 FR 15181 (April 9, 2018) (SR-OCC-2018-007) (``Notice''). \4\ OCC submitted Amendment No. 1 to correct an error in Exhibit 5B of the Notice, which did not accurately reflect the text of existing OCC Rule 2202(c) and erroneously contained proposed changes to that inaccurate text. Amendment No. 1 clarifies that the rule text for existing Rule 2202(c) would remain unchanged and would not be affected by the proposed rule change. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. Description of the Proposed Rule Change 5 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ The subsequent description of the proposed rule change is substantially excerpted from OCC's description in the Notice. See Notice, 83 FR 15181-15186. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- OCC proposed to amend OCC's By-Laws (``By-Laws'') and Rules to: (1) Clarify the time at which OCC accepts and novates \6\ the transactions that it clears; (2) streamline provisions in the By-Laws and Rules related to trade reporting and novation; and (3) delete provisions that apply only to certain dormant products that OCC no longer clears and settles or that are no longer applicable to OCC's current clearing processes. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ In this context, novation is the process through which OCC is substituted as the buyer to the seller and the seller to the buyer for each cleared contact. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 25088]] Background Acceptance and Novation Timing Clearly stating the specific time at which OCC accepts transactions for clearance and settlement is important to Clearing Members because it signifies the time under the By-Laws and Rules at which the following events occur: (1) OCC is substituted through novation as the central counterparty (``CCP'') to each Clearing Member that was an initial party to the transaction; (2) the rights of the initial Clearing Member parties to the transaction become solely as against OCC; and (3) OCC becomes obligated to each Clearing Member in accordance with the By-Laws and Rules,\7\ including as a guarantor of the settlement obligations associated with transactions that OCC accepts and novates.\8\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See, e.g., Article VI, Section 5 of the By-Laws. \8\ See generally 15 U.S.C. 78q-1; 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Current Acceptance and Novation of Confirmed Trades While most trades are functionally novated upon proper submission to OCC for clearing, OCC's current By-Laws and Rules require a user to parse through a number of provisions and definitions in various locations to identify the time at which acceptance and novation occur. For example, the term Confirmed Trade \9\ is defined to include all of the products for which OCC currently provides clearance and settlement services, with the exception of certain Stock Loan \10\ transactions. A Confirmed Trade is novated upon OCC's acceptance of the trade, but acceptance is not deemed to occur until a designated Commencement Time. Commencement Time is defined differently for different products that meet the definition of a Confirmed Trade, but one section of the By- Laws (regarding OCC's obligations) generally defines it as the time at which OCC makes available to Clearing Members a Daily Position Report reflecting the Confirmed Trade.\11\ Another section of the By-Laws (regarding the reporting of Confirmed Trades) specifies that this acceptance is subject to the condition that the Exchange or OTC Trade Source on which the transaction occurred has reported to OCC, during such times as OCC has prescribed, certain information regarding the Confirmed Trade and that such information passes OCC's initial validation checks.\12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ Under the By-Laws, a Confirmed Trade is defined as ``a transaction for the purchase, writing, or sale of a cleared contract, or for the closing out of a long or short position in a cleared contract, that is (i) effected on or through the facilities of an Exchange and submitted to the Corporation for clearance or (ii) affirmed through the facilities of an OTC Trade Source and submitted to the Corporation for clearance.'' \10\ See Article I, Section 1.S.(21) of the By-Laws. The term Stock Loan may refer to either a Hedge Loan that is part of OCC's Stock Loan/Hedge Program or a Market Loan that is part of OCC's Market Loan Program. Matters regarding the acceptance and novation of these products are addressed separately below. \11\ Article VI, Section 5 of the By-Laws. This typically occurs at the end of each business day. \12\ Article VI, Section 7 of the By-Laws. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Under yet another section of the By-Laws, OCC generally has no right (other than regarding certain types of Confirmed Trades discussed below) to reject a Confirmed Trade due to the failure of the Purchasing Clearing Member to pay any amount due to OCC at or before the settlement time.\13\ This means that transactions in most products that are Confirmed Trades will inevitably be accepted for clearing and novated at the Commencement Time simply due to the passage of time.\14\ OCC proposed the changes herein to reflect this reality. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ See Article VI, Section 8 of the By-Laws. \14\ An Exchange or OTC Trade Source, however, may instruct OCC to disregard a transaction that it previously reported as a Confirmed Trade ``because of a subsequent determination that (i) the trade information submitted by the Purchasing Clearing Member and Selling Clearing Member did not agree, (ii) the trade information did not contain all the information required by the Corporation as set forth in the By-Laws and Rules, or (iii) new or revised trade information was required to properly clear the transaction.'' See Article VI, Section 7 of the By-Laws. This authority would be preserved and relocated into OCC's Rules in connection with the proposed changes described herein. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Different Commencement Times and Rejection Rights for Certain Confirmed Trades Certain categories of Confirmed Trades are not subject to the general Commencement Time described above, and OCC retains certain rights to reject such transactions. Specifically, Article VI, Section 5 of the By-Laws excludes the products described below from the general Commencement Time, while setting forth the following alternate definitions of Commencement Time: (1) For futures issued in exchange-for-physical transactions,\15\ block trades,\16\ or other trades designated as non-competitively executed: The time after the transaction is reported to OCC that OCC receives the first variation settlement payment; \17\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ An exchange-for-physical transaction (or ``EFP'') is a transaction between two parties in which a futures contract on a commodity or security is exchanged for the actual physical good. \16\ A block trade is a trade involving a large number of shares being traded at an arranged price between parties, outside of the open markets, in order to lessen the impact of such a large trade being made public. \17\ See Article XII, Section 7 of the By-Laws. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (2) For cross-rate FX options and FX index options: The time that is three hours following the settlement time of the Confirmed Trade in which such contract was purchased; \18\ and --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \18\ See Articles XX, Section 1 and XXIII, Section 1 of the By- Laws. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (3) For OTC Options (other than Backloaded OTC Options): The time when a report of OCC's acceptance is made available to Clearing Members through OCC's clearing system.\19\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \19\ See Article VI, Section 5 of the By-Laws. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- That same section of the By-Laws specifies that, for Backloaded OTC Options, the transaction is not accepted for clearing until the Selling Clearing Member has met its regular morning settlement obligation on the business day following the reporting of the trade to OCC.\20\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \20\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In addition to the separate Commencement Times for these types of Confirmed Trades, OCC also currently has certain authority to reject such trades due to the failure of the Purchasing Clearing Member to pay an amount due to OCC at or before the applicable settlement time.\21\ In contrast to most other types of Confirmed Trades, this means that OCC continues to have authority to reject these transactions even after they are properly submitted for clearing. OCC's authority to reject these types of Confirmed Trades arises under the following circumstances: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \21\ See generally Article VI, Section 8 of the By-Laws identifying these exceptions. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) For futures issued in exchange-for-physical transactions, block trades, or other trades designated as non-competitively executed: In the event OCC fails to receive any variation payment due in the accounts of the Clearing Members; \22\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \22\ See Article XII, Section 7 of the By-Laws. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (2) For cross-rate FX options and FX index options: In the event OCC fails to receive from the Purchasing Clearing Member premiums denominated in the proper trading currency in the account in which the transaction is effected; \23\ and --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \23\ See Article XX, Section 5, Article XXIII, Section 7 of the By-Laws. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (3) For Backloaded OTC Options: In the event the Selling Clearing Member does not meet its regular morning settlement obligation on the business day following the reporting of the trade to OCC.\24\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \24\ See Article VI, Section 8 of the By-Laws. In addition, OCC will not accept a Backloaded OTC Option for clearing if OCC receives it from the OTC Trade Source after 4 p.m. Central on the business day that is four business days prior to its expiration. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 25089]] Proposed Changes to Acceptance and Novation Rules Proposed Uniform Acceptance and Novation Timing for Nearly All Confirmed Trades To provide greater certainty and clarity to Clearing Members and other interested parties regarding the acceptance and novation timing for transactions that OCC clears and settles, OCC proposed to amend the substance of Article VI, Section 5 of the By-Laws \25\ to set forth a uniform acceptance and novation time for nearly all Confirmed Trades. As described in more detail below, OCC would retain exceptions from the uniform acceptance and novation time for Confirmed Trades in Backloaded OTC Options and Confirmed Trades in futures issued in exchange-for- physical transactions, block trades, or other trades designated as non- competitively executed. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \25\ As described below under the heading Reorganization, OCC also proposes to relocate the provisions currently in Article VI, Section 5 of the By-Laws to Rules 401 and 404. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- To accomplish this, OCC proposed to eliminate the concept of Commencement Time and instead deem nearly all Confirmed Trades to be accepted and simultaneously novated when they are reported to OCC and the related position information has been recorded in OCC's clearing system (which occurs on a real-time basis).\26\ This would, however, be subject to the condition that the required transaction information reported to OCC by the Exchange or OTC Trade Source first passes OCC's validation procedures \27\ and is provided to OCC at such time as OCC prescribes. This change is intended to provide a more definitive indication of the point after which OCC no longer has authority to reject such transactions for clearing.\28\ Eliminating the concept of Commencement Time also necessitates deleting the term from the defined terms in Article I, Section 1 of the By-Laws and replacing all references to Commencement Time with references to the time at which OCC accepts a transaction for clearing. To do this, OCC proposed to amend the following provisions of its By-Laws: Article I (definition of ``American; American-style''); Sections 5, 6, and 12 of Article VI; \29\ and Section 7 of Article XII. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \26\ OCC notes that upon acceptance and recording of position information in OCC's ENCORE clearing system, Clearing Members have the ability to see the trades they are responsible for via position information screens in the ENCORE system and through real-time messaging. \27\ All inbound trades to OCC are subject to coded validation of the required fields for trades. These fields contain the critical details of the trade, including but not limited to the trade source, symbol, expiration, strike, call or put, quantity, price, and Clearing Member details of both sides of the trade. \28\ As described above, an Exchange or OTC Trade Source would continue to have the authority to instruct OCC to disregard a Confirmed Trade. See supra 10. \29\ As described in more detail below, OCC proposes to relocate Article VI, Sections 5 and 6 to Rules 401, 404, and 405 to help streamline and reorganize provisions addressing trade reporting and novation. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- OCC also proposed to amend Rule 401 to clarify the trade information required to be submitted by the participant Exchange to OCC as a condition to acceptance and novation. For options transactions, amended Rule 401(a)(1)(i) would provide that these terms include: (a) The identity of the Purchasing Clearing Member and Writing Clearing Member to the transaction; (b) the clearing date; (c) the transaction time; (d) the trade source; (e) the trade quantity; (f) the trade price; (g) the security type; (h) the ticker symbol; (i) the series/ contract date; (j) whether the trade is a put or a call; (k) the strike price; (l) whether the trade is a purchase or a sale; (m) the account type; (n) the allocation indicator, if applicable; (o) the CMTA indicator, if applicable; (p) the Give-Up Clearing Member, if applicable; (q) the trade type, including, in the case of futures options, whether the transaction is a block trade, exchange-for- physical, or any other trade designated by the futures market or security futures market reporting the trade as a non-competitively executed trade; (r) in the case of OTC options transactions in a securities customers' account, a unique customer ID for the customer for whom the trade was executed; and (s) in the case of OTC options, such other variable terms as provided in Section 6 of Article XVII of the By-Laws. In addition, new Rule 401(a)(1)(ii) would provide that OCC may also request certain optional trade information that is not required as a condition for acceptance.\30\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \30\ OCC makes available to its participant Exchanges and Clearing Members the complete list of required and optional trade information in an inbound reference guide for Exchange trades. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For futures transactions, Rule 401(a)(2)(i) would be amended to provide that the required terms for acceptance and novation include: (a) The identity of the Purchasing Clearing Member and the Selling Clearing Member to the transaction; (b) the clearing date; (c) the transaction time; (d) the trade source; (e) the trade quantity; (f) the trade price; (g) the security type; (h) the ticker symbol; (i) the series/contract date; (j) whether the trade is a purchase or a sale; (k) the account type; (l) the allocation indicator, if applicable; (m) the CMTA indicator, if applicable; (n) the Give-Up Clearing Member, if applicable; and (o) whether the trade is an exchange-for-physical or block trade or any other trade designated by the futures market or security futures market reporting the trade as a non-competitively executed trade. In addition, new Rule 401(a)(2)(ii) would provide that OCC may also request certain optional trade information that is not required as a condition for acceptance. Taken together, these changes are designed to provide a uniform approach for nearly all Confirmed Trades regarding acceptance and novation. OCC believes the changes will reduce the complexity of its Rules and By-Laws, while at the same time providing significantly greater clarity and transparency in OCC's legal framework for Clearing Members and other interested parties concerning the point at which OCC does not have authority to reject a transaction after it has been properly submitted to and validated by OCC. OCC believes that adopting this uniform approach regarding acceptance and novation will neither functionally change the time at which OCC becomes obligated regarding Confirmed Trades nor otherwise alter the credit risk OCC faces with respect to such Confirmed Trades. First, providing that nearly all Confirmed Trades are accepted and novated upon proper submission functionally would not change the time at which OCC becomes obligated regarding such Confirmed Trades because OCC currently has no right to reject Confirmed Trades, upon proper submission, due to the failure of a Purchasing Clearing Member to pay any amount due to OCC at or before the settlement time. Second, OCC generally does not collect margin with respect to such Confirmed Trades until 9:00 a.m. Central the following business day.\31\ OCC, therefore, already faces this same credit risk between the acceptance of the Confirmed Trades and the time that it collects margin from Clearing Members. Accordingly, OCC does not anticipate that moving the novation time from the general Commencement Time to earlier in the day as described above--at the point of acceptance--would alter the credit risk OCC faces with respect to such Confirmed Trades. In addition, OCC would continue to have the same authority that it does today to address any credit risk as [[Page 25090]] necessary through intra-day margin collection.\32\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \31\ See Article I, Section 1.S.(16) of the By-Laws (defining the term ``settlement time'' in respect of a Clearing Member's obligation to pay amounts owed to OCC). \32\ See OCC Rule 609 (addressing OCC's authority to require intra-day margin). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Further, OCC believes that it would be appropriate to also apply the uniform acceptance and novation time to OTC Options that are not Backloaded OTC Options. OTC Options currently are subject to an alternative Commencement Time, designated for OTC Options that are not Backloaded OTC Options as the time when a report of OCC's acceptance is made available to Clearing Members through OCC's clearing system.\33\ In practice, OCC automatically makes a report of its acceptance of such OTC Options available to Clearing Members in its clearing system, provided the OTC Option is properly reported to OCC, the contract passes OCC's validation process, and the contract is not rejected, all of which generally is completed immediately upon submission of the contract to OCC.\34\ This is consistent with the new uniform approach OCC proposed, which would deem nearly all Confirmed Trades to be accepted and simultaneously novated when they are reported to OCC and the related position information has been recorded in OCC's clearing system, which occurs on a real-time basis. Accordingly, OCC believes there is no operational, risk management, or other reason to exclude OTC Options that are not Backloaded OTC Options from the proposed uniform acceptance and novation timing. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \33\ Article VI, Section 5 of the By-Laws. \34\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68434 (December 14, 2012), 77 FR 75243 (December 19, 2012) (SR-OCC-2012-14 and AN-OCC- 2012-01) (discussing the trade submission mechanics for OTC Options). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Proposed Exceptions to the Uniform Acceptance and Novation Timing For other categories of Confirmed Trades that currently are not subject to the general definition of Commencement Time (i.e., Confirmed Trades in futures issued in exchange-for-physical transactions, block trades, or other trades designated as non-competitively executed), OCC proposed to preserve the existing structure under which OCC has authority to reject the transactions even after they are properly submitted for clearing by creating an exception to the uniform acceptance and novation timing for such trades. OCC believes that delayed novation continues to be appropriate for such non-competitively executed transactions because there is a heightened risk that non- competitive execution may cause them to be effected at off-market prices, which could lead to significant losses if a Clearing Member defaults on the related settlement obligations.\35\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \35\ OCC also proposes to add new Interpretation and Policy .05 to provide that OCC will not treat an EFP or block trade as a noncompetitively executed trade subject to Article XII, Section 7 of the By-Laws if the Exchange on which such trade is executed has made representations satisfactory to OCC that the Exchange has rules, policies or procedures that require each EFP and block trade that is submitted to OCC to be executed at a reasonable price and that such price is validated by the Exchange. This new Interpretation and Policy to Rule 401 would reiterate current Interpretation and Policy .04 to Article XII, Section 7 of the By-Laws to provide additional clarity in the Rules around the acceptance and novation time for competitively executed EFPs and block trades. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- As proposed, an exception to the uniform acceptance and novation timing also would be made for Confirmed Trades that are Backloaded OTC Options, which are defined as OTC Options for which the premium payment date is prior to the business day on which the transaction is submitted to OCC for clearing.\36\ OCC believes that an exception for Backloaded OTC Options remains necessary because their ``backloaded'' nature means that the premium payment has already been made. Backloaded OTC Options also are subject to being non-competitively executed and therefore present the same heightened settlement default risk regarding other non-competitively executed transactions discussed above. In addition, because OCC is not able to immediately validate a Backloaded OTC Options transaction or check its price reasonability upon submission, OCC believes that it remains appropriate to continue its existing practice of delaying acceptance and novation for these contracts until the selling Clearing Member has met its regular morning settlement obligations on the business day following trade reporting. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \36\ See Article I, Section 1.B.(1) of the By-Laws. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Provisional Information Regarding Confirmed Trades OCC proposed that its acceptance and novation time would no longer be tied to publication of a Daily Position Report, given that OCC's acceptance of a Confirmed Trade would instead be reflected in the position information that OCC makes available to Clearing Members throughout the business day. Accordingly, OCC proposed to amend Interpretation and Policy .01 to Rule 501 to: (1) Clarify that OCC makes updated position data reflecting accepted and novated trades available to its Clearing Members throughout the day; and (2) remove from that provision a statement that Clearing Members must rely on the Daily Position Report for definitive information regarding their positions. Hedge Loans and Market Loans In addition to its clearance and settlement of Confirmed Trades, OCC also acts as a CCP for certain stock lending transactions that are part of its Stock Loan/Hedge Program and Market Loan Program. OCC proposed to amend its rules for both programs to better describe its process for accepting Hedge Loans and Market Loans and to appropriately harmonize certain provisions governing each type of Stock Loan.\37\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \37\ See OCC Rules 2202(b); 2202A(b), (c). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stock Loan/Hedge Loan Program. Hedge Loans are initiated as stock lending transactions that are negotiated and settled between Clearing Members at The Depository Trust Company (``DTC'') before they are reported to OCC. Rule 2202(b) provides that OCC must generally accept these stock lending transactions upon receipt of a report from DTC that shows a completed transaction.\38\ However, OCC may reject a transaction if it determines that it is: (1) Not in accordance with OCC's By-Laws or Rules; (2) one or both account numbers specified are invalid for Hedge Loans; or (3) the information provided by DTC contains errors or omissions. Moreover, Rule 2202(b) provides that if OCC does not affirmatively reject a reported transaction by such a time as OCC is authorized to specify from time to time then the transaction is deemed accepted as a Hedge Loan. Upon acceptance, OCC becomes the lender to the Borrowing Clearing Member and the borrower to the Lending Clearing Member. Although OCC has discretion during each business day to make provisional information available to Clearing Members regarding their lending and borrowing activity, only the Stock Loan Mark to Market Activity Report is recognized as providing definitive Hedge Loan positions.\39\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \38\ OCC is not obligated to accept the stock lending transactions of a Clearing Member that has been suspended by DTC. See OCC Rule 2210(a). The same condition applies regarding Market Loans. See OCC Rule 2210A(a). \39\ See Rule 2202, Interpretation and Policy .01. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- OCC proposed to amend Rule 2202(b) to clarify that OCC receives and accepts completed transaction information from DTC throughout the day, and it would delete the statement that a transaction is deemed accepted by a particular cut off time if OCC does not affirmatively notify Clearing Members of a rejection. Rule 2202(b) would instead state that OCC generally accepts completed transactions reported to it unless: (1) OCC is otherwise required to reject a transaction because it is not in accordance with the By-Laws or Rules; [[Page 25091]] (2) one or both account numbers specified are invalid; or (3) the information provided contains unresolved errors or omissions. OCC believes that these changes will help clarify the time at which Hedge Loans are accepted and the specific circumstances in which Hedge Loans will be rejected. As discussed more fully below, the change also would ensure consistency between parallel provisions in the Stock Loan/Hedge Program and Market Loan Program regarding the initiation process, which OCC believes should apply equally across both programs. Finally, a reference to the Stock Loan Mark to Market Activity Report being the only definitive statement of positions would be deleted because Hedge Loan positions would be definitive upon acceptance in OCC's clearing system. Market Loan Program. In connection with the Market Loan Program initiation process, DTC also sends information to OCC regarding completed stock lending transactions. Rule 2202A(b) provides that, upon OCC's receipt of an end of day stock loan activity file from DTC, OCC must accept the transactions as Market Loans unless it is required to reject them for the same reasons described above concerning Hedge Loans. The Rule further provides that, upon OCC's affirmative acceptance, OCC becomes the lender to the Borrowing Clearing Member and the borrower to the Lending Clearing Member. As with the proposed changes to the Stock Loan Hedge Program, OCC proposed to clarify that OCC receives and accepts completed transaction information from DTC throughout the day. OCC also proposed to delete a reference to affirmative acceptance in Rule 2202A(b) because the other proposed changes would clarify that acceptance will generally take place automatically unless OCC is specifically required to reject transactions due to the deficiencies described above. A conforming change also would be made in this regard in Rule 2202A(c). References to the definitive nature of the Stock Loan Mark to Market Activity Report would be deleted for the same reasons described above regarding Hedge Loans. Streamlining and Reorganization As part of its continued effort to streamline its By-Laws and Rules, OCC proposed to relocate certain provisions from Article VI, Sections 4 through 8 of the By-Laws to Chapter IV of the Rules. This change would promote a centralized location for provisions that address trade reporting and novation. OCC also proposed to consolidate certain provisions in Chapter IV of the Rules to eliminate redundancy. These proposed organizational changes are summarized below. OCC would relocate Article VI, Section 4 of OCC's By-Laws regarding a Purchasing Clearing Member's obligations with respect to a Confirmed Trade, without amendment, to a new Rule 403. As described above, OCC would amend Article VI, Section 5 of the By-Laws regarding OCC's obligations with respect to a Confirmed Trade, and it would be incorporated into existing Rule 401 and new Rule 404. As described above, OCC would amend Article VI, Section 6 of the By-Laws regarding the issuance of cleared contracts, and it would be relocated to a new Rule 405. OCC would relocate Article VI, Section 7 of the By-Laws regarding the reporting of confirmed trades incorporate it into Rule 401. More specifically, Article VI, Section 7(b) of the By-Laws would become Rule 401(e), Section 7(c) would become Rule 401(f), and Interpretation and Policy .01 to Section 7 would become Interpretation and Policy .03 to Rule 401. As described above, OCC would amend Article VI, Section 8 of the By-Laws regarding payments made to OCC and relocate it to new Rule 406. To accommodate these new rules in Chapter IV, current Rule 403 would be renumbered as 407, and current Rule 405 would be renumbered as Rule 408. Cross-references also would be updated to reflect this renumbering throughout Chapter IV of the Rules, as well as in Article I, Section 1.G.(3) and (4), Article VI, Section 2, and Article XVII, Sections 2(a) and 2(c)(1) of the By-Laws, and Rules 504(e), 504(g), and 611(a). Additionally, to create a more centralized trade reporting rule, OCC proposed to delete existing Rule 404 regarding the reporting of confirmed trades in OTC Options and to incorporate its substance into Rule 401. This would require the addition of references to OTC Trade Sources in Rule 401(a) and (b), and the merger of language from Rule 404(b) into Rule 401(b) and from Rule 404(c) into Rule 401(d). Elimination of Dormant Products and Rules OCC no longer clears and settles cross-rate foreign currency options and flexibly-structured index options denominated in a foreign currency. Accordingly, OCC proposed to delete certain provisions from its By-Laws and Rules that only apply to such products. When OCC still actively cleared and settled these products they were subject to delayed novation. OCC therefore believes that eliminating the rules governing these products at this time would avoid confusion and enhance clarity regarding OCC's proposed uniform approach to trade acceptance and novation timing. Consequently, OCC proposed to delete Articles XX and XXIII of its By-Laws, which governs cross-rate foreign currency options, and Chapters XXI and XXIV of its Rules, which govern flexibly- structured index options denominated in a foreign currency. Additionally, OCC proposed to eliminate all other references to such products throughout its By-Laws and Rules, including in Section 1(d) of Article V, and Interpretation and Policy .03 to Section 1 of Article V of the By-Laws and Rules 607, 1107(a)(3) and 1107(a)(4), as well as in the definitions of Option Contract, Trading Currency, and Underlying Currency in Article I of the By-Laws. OCC also proposed to delete Rule 402 concerning the supplementary reporting of Confirmed Trades. Rule 402 grants OCC the discretion to, in certain extraordinary circumstances, accept from an Exchange after the cut-off time for receiving Confirmed Trade information for a particular business day (``trade date''), supplementary Confirmed Trade information reflecting the comparison of additional trades executed on or before the trade date that remained unconfirmed at the cut-off time. Rule 402 was adopted at a time when OCC received matched trade information from Exchanges for a given trade date in a single batch submission after the close of the trading day.\40\ Under this old process, trades that remained unmatched when an Exchange prepared its nightly trade tape to OCC were omitted from the tape and, if a trade was subsequently matched, the Exchange reported the trade to OCC the following night to be processed as if it had not been executed until the date when it was reported. OCC adopted Rule 402 to accommodate the late submission of trades that had not been matched in time to be submitted on the Exchange's original trade tape, thereby allowing those trades to be processed as if they were submitted on their original trade date. OCC proposed to delete Rule 402 because it is no longer applicable to OCC's current clearing processes, whereby OCC continuously receives matched trade information from Exchanges on a real-time basis. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \40\ See Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change of Options Clearing Corporation, Securities Exchange Act Release No. 21233 (August 10, 1984) (SR-OCC-84-12). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 25092]] II. Discussion and Commission Findings Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act directs the Commission to approve a proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if it finds that such proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to such organization.\41\ After carefully considering the proposed rule change, the Commission believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to OCC. More specifically, the Commission believes that the proposal is consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act \42\ and Rule 17Ad-22(e)(1) under the Act.\43\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \41\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C). \42\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F). \43\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- A. Consistency With Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act \44\ requires, among other things, that the rules of a clearing agency be designed to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in the clearance and settlement of securities transactions, promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities and derivatives transactions, and, in general, protect investors and the public interest. As described above, the proposed rule change is intended to provide a clear and uniform acceptance and novation time for nearly all Confirmed Trades and to clarify the acceptance and novation timing regarding Stock Loans by specifying the time at which novation occurs and when Confirmed Trades and Stock Loans may no longer be rejected by OCC. Under the proposed uniform acceptance time, OCC would deem nearly all Confirmed Trades to be accepted and simultaneously novated when they are reported to OCC, provided that the transaction information reported to OCC passes OCC's validation procedures and is provided to OCC at such time as OCC's rules prescribe. In addition, the proposed rule change would eliminate certain dormant rules no longer applicable to OCC's clearance and settlement services and processes. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \44\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Commission believes that these changes would provide greater clarity and transparency to Clearing Members, other users of OCC, and the general public regarding OCC's processes for the reporting of transactions, acceptance, and novation. Instead of parsing through multiple different definitions and provisions in various locations throughout OCC's By-Laws and Rules to identify the different times at which acceptance and novation occurs for different transactions, users and other interested parties will be able to refer to more uniform approach set forth in a single chapter of OCC's Rules. This, in turn, will help avoid potential confusion and ambiguity. Accordingly, the Commission believes that, taken together, these changes will help foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in the clearance and settlement of securities transactions, promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities and derivatives transactions, and, in general, protect investors and the public interest consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act.\45\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \45\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- B. Consistency with Rule 17Ad-22(e)(1) Rule 17Ad-22(e)(1) \46\ requires a covered clearing agency to establish, implement, maintain and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably designed to provide for a well-founded, clear, transparent and enforceable legal basis for each aspect of its activities in all relevant jurisdictions. The Commission believes the proposed changes are consistent with Rule 17Ad-22(e)(1) for the reasons set forth below. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \46\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- First, by modifying the current process so that all Confirmed Trades, subject to limited exceptions, would be deemed accepted and simultaneously novated when they are reported to OCC and the related position information has been recorded in OCC's clearing system, the proposed rule change would provide a clear and uniform time regarding OCC's acceptance and novation for nearly all Confirmed Trades and clarify OCC's acceptance and novation process regarding Stock Loans. The Commission believes this would bring clarity and transparency to OCC's By-Laws and Rulebook and help simplify the process of reporting transactions, acceptance, and novation, which in turn will help ensure that OCC has a well-founded, clear, transparent, and enforceable legal basis regarding the rights and obligations of OCC and Clearing Members regarding Confirmed Trades, consistent with Rule 17Ad-22(e)(1). Second, the Commission believes that the streamlining and reorganizing all of the provisions concerning transaction reporting, acceptance, and novation and consolidating them in Chapter IV of the Rules would promote consistency and readability and help avoid potential confusion and ambiguity, and therefore allow the provisions to be more easily understood. For example, enumerating the trade information required to be submitted by participant Exchanges to OCC for options and futures transactions would allow for greater clarity of the information required and that may be requested by OCC. Similarly, by better describing the process by which Hedge Loans and Market Loans are accepted, OCC would harmonize the relevant provisions of its Rulebook governing each type of Stock Loan. In addition, the Commission believes eliminating provisions related to processes no longer supported by OCC and dormant products that are no longer cleared and settled by OCC would improve the clarity and transparency of its By- Laws and Rules. Accordingly, the Commission believes that the changes proposed in the proposed rule change are consistent with Rule 17Ad- 22(e)(1) under the Act.\47\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \47\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- III. Solicitation of Comments on Amendment No. 1 Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning whether Amendment No. 1, is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic CommentsUse the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include File Number SR-OCC-2018-007 on the subject line. Paper Comments Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-OCC-2018-007. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than [[Page 25093]] those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of OCC and on OCC's website at https://www.theocc.com/about/publications/bylaws.jsp. All comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-OCC-2018-007 and should be submitted on or before June 15, 2018. IV. Approval of Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1 As discussed above, OCC submitted Amendment No. 1 to accurately reflect existing Rule 2202(c), which would not be affected by the proposed rule change. The Commission believes that Amendment No. 1 does not raise any novel issues or alter the proposed changes in any way. In addition, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, is consistent with Act and applicable rules thereunder for the reasons discussed above. Accordingly, the Commission finds good cause to approve the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1 pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act.\48\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \48\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- V. Conclusion On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, is consistent with the requirements of the Act, in particular with the requirements of Section 17A of the Act \49\ and Rule 17Ad-22(e)(1) thereunder. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \49\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) \50\ of the Act, that the proposed rule change (SR-OCC-2018-007) be, and it hereby is, approved. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \50\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). \51\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\51\ Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2018-11611 Filed 5-30-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 105 / Thursday, May 31, 2018 / Notices 25087
an applicant using the Company name on net asset value. No expenses were SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
box, at http://www.sec.gov/search/ incurred in connection with the COMMISSION
search.htm or by calling (202) 551– liquidation.
8090. An order granting each Filing Dates: The application was [Release No. 34–83321; File No. SR–OCC–
application will be issued unless the 2018–007]
filed on May 5, 2017, and amended on
SEC orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a May 1, 2018. Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
hearing on any application by writing to Applicant’s Address: Two Options Clearing Corporation; Notice
the SEC’s Secretary at the address below International Place, Boston, of Filing of Amendment No. 1 and
and serving the relevant applicant with Massachusetts 02110. Order Approving Proposed Rule
a copy of the request, personally or by Change, as Modified by Amendment
mail. Hearing requests should be Compass Strategic Investments Fund No. 1, Related to The Options Clearing
received by the SEC by 5:30 p.m. on [File No. 811–09021] Corporation’s Trade Acceptance and
June 19, 2018, and should be Summary: Applicant, a closed-end Novation Rules
accompanied by proof of service on
investment company, seeks an order May 24, 2018.
applicants, in the form of an affidavit or,
declaring that it has ceased to be an On March 23, 2018, the Options
for lawyers, a certificate of service.
Pursuant to Rule 0–5 under the Act, investment company. Applicant has Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) filed with
hearing requests should state the nature never made a public offering of its the Securities and Exchange
of the writer’s interest, any facts bearing securities and does not propose to make Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
upon the desirability of a hearing on the a public offering. Applicant will to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
matter, the reason for the request, and continue to operate in reliance on Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and
the issues contested. Persons who wish Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the Act, or Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 proposed rule
to be notified of a hearing may request another applicable exclusion or change SR–OCC–2018–007. The
notification by writing to the exemption. proposed rule change was published for
Commission’s Secretary. Filing Dates: The application was comment in the Federal Register on
ADDRESSES: The Commission: Secretary,
April 9, 2018.3 The Commission did not
filed on April 5, 2018, and amended on
U.S. Securities and Exchange receive any comments on the proposed
May 18, 2018.
Commission, 100 F Street NE, rule change. On April 19, 2018, OCC
Applicant’s Address: MIO Partners, filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
Inc, 245 Park Avenue, 13th Floor, New rule change.4 The Commission is
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
York, New York 10167. publishing this notice to solicit
Shawn Davis, Branch Chief, at (202)
comment on Amendment No. 1 from
551–6413 or Chief Counsel’s Office at Partners Income Fund [File No. 811–
interested persons and is approving the
(202) 551–6821; SEC, Division of 06708]
proposed rule change, as modified by
Investment Management, Chief
Summary: Applicant, a closed-end Amendment No. 1.
Counsel’s Office, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–8010. investment company, seeks an order I. Description of the Proposed Rule
declaring that it has ceased to be an Change 5
Alpine Equity Trust [File No. 811– investment company. The applicant has
05684] OCC proposed to amend OCC’s By-
transferred its assets to Compass Special
Laws (‘‘By-Laws’’) and Rules to: (1)
Alpine Income Trust [File No. 811– Situations Fund LLC, and, on November Clarify the time at which OCC accepts
21210] 1, 2006, made a final distribution to its and novates 6 the transactions that it
Alpine Series Trust [File No. 811– shareholders based on net asset value. clears; (2) streamline provisions in the
10405] Expenses of $42,065 incurred in By-Laws and Rules related to trade
Summary: Each applicant seeks an connection with the reorganization were reporting and novation; and (3) delete
order declaring that it has ceased to be paid by the acquiring fund. provisions that apply only to certain
an investment company. Applicants Filing Dates: The application was dormant products that OCC no longer
transferred their assets to the Aberdeen filed on April 5, 2018, and amended on clears and settles or that are no longer
Funds and, on May 7, 2018, made final May 18, 2018. applicable to OCC’s current clearing
distributions to their shareholders based processes.
Applicant’s Address: MIO Partners,
on net asset value. Aggregate expenses Inc, 245 Park Avenue, 13th Floor, New
of $704,589 incurred in connection with York, New York 10167.
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
the reorganizations were paid by the
applicants’ investment adviser and the For the Commission, by the Division of 3 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82984
Investment Management, pursuant to (April 3, 2018), 83 FR 15181 (April 9, 2018) (SR–
acquiring funds’ investment adviser. OCC–2018–007) (‘‘Notice’’).
Filing Dates: The applications were delegated authority. 4 OCC submitted Amendment No. 1 to correct an
filed on May 11, 2018, and amended on Eduardo A. Aleman, error in Exhibit 5B of the Notice, which did not
May 23, 2018. Assistant Secretary. accurately reflect the text of existing OCC Rule
Applicants’ Addresses: 2500 2202(c) and erroneously contained proposed
[FR Doc. 2018–11729 Filed 5–30–18; 8:45 am] changes to that inaccurate text. Amendment No. 1
Westchester Avenue, Suite 215, clarifies that the rule text for existing Rule 2202(c)
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Purchase, New York 10577.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
would remain unchanged and would not be affected
by the proposed rule change.
Bond Portfolio II [File No. 811–23008] 5 The subsequent description of the proposed rule
Summary: Applicant seeks an order change is substantially excerpted from OCC’s
declaring that it has ceased to be an description in the Notice. See Notice, 83 FR 15181–
15186.
investment company. On April 21, 6 In this context, novation is the process through
2016, applicant made a liquidating which OCC is substituted as the buyer to the seller
distribution to its shareholders, based and the seller to the buyer for each cleared contact.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:46 May 30, 2018 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00122 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31MYN1.SGM 31MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_25192/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 105 / Thursday, May 31, 2018 / Notices 25093
those that may be withheld from the For the Commission, by the Division of the places specified in Item IV below.
public in accordance with the Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated The Exchange has prepared summaries,
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be authority.51 set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
available for website viewing and Eduardo A. Aleman, of the most significant parts of such
printing in the Commission’s Public Assistant Secretary. statements.
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, [FR Doc. 2018–11611 Filed 5–30–18; 8:45 am]
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Washington, DC 20549, on official BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
business days between the hours of Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such Change
filing also will be available for SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
inspection and copying at the principal COMMISSION 1. Purpose
office of OCC and on OCC’s website at [Release No. 34–83320; File No. SR– The Commission has approved the
https://www.theocc.com/about/ NYSEArca–2018–35] listing and trading on the Exchange of
publications/bylaws.jsp. shares (‘‘Shares’’) of the Fund, under
All comments received will be posted Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE NYSE Arca Rule 8.600–E(j)(3) (formerly
without change. Persons submitting Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.600), which
comments are cautioned that we do not Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed governs the listing and trading of
redact or edit personal identifying Rule Change Relating to the Peritus Managed Fund Shares.4 The Fund’s
information from comment submissions. High Yield ETF Shares are currently listed and traded
You should submit only information on the Exchange under NYSE Arca Rule
May 24, 2018
that you wish to make available 8.600–E.5 The Shares are offered by
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the AdvisorShares Trust (‘‘Trust’’).6
publicly. Securities Exchange Act of 1934
All submissions should refer to File (‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3 4 A Managed Fund Share is a security that
Number SR–OCC–2018–007 and should notice is hereby given that, on May 14, represents an interest in an investment company
be submitted on or before June 15, 2018. 2018, NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘Exchange’’ or registered under the Investment Company Act of
‘‘NYSE Arca’’) filed with the Securities 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-1) (the ‘‘1940 Act’’) organized
IV. Approval of Proposed Rule Change, as an open-end investment company or similar
and Exchange Commission entity that invests in a portfolio of securities
as Modified by Amendment No. 1 (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule selected by its investment adviser consistent with
As discussed above, OCC submitted change as described in Items I and II its investment objectives and policies. In contrast,
below, which Items have been prepared an open-end investment company that issues
Amendment No. 1 to accurately reflect Investment Company Units, listed and traded on
by the self-regulatory organization. The the Exchange under NYSE Arca Rule 5.2–E(j)(3),
existing Rule 2202(c), which would not
Commission is publishing this notice to seeks to provide investment results that correspond
be affected by the proposed rule change.
solicit comments on the proposed rule generally to the price and yield performance of a
The Commission believes that specific foreign or domestic stock index, fixed
change from interested persons.
Amendment No. 1 does not raise any income securities index or combination thereof.
novel issues or alter the proposed I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 5 The Commission previously approved the
changes in any way. In addition, the Statement of the Terms of Substance of listing and trading of the Shares of the Fund. See
Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 63329
Commission finds that the proposed the Proposed Rule Change (November 17, 2010), 75 FR 71260 (November 24,
rule change, as modified by Amendment The Exchange proposes to change 2010) (SR–NYSEArca–2010–86) (Order Granting
No. 1, is consistent with Act and Approval of Proposed Rule Change Relating to the
certain representations made in the Listing and Trading of Shares of the Peritus High
applicable rules thereunder for the respective proposed rule changes Yield ETF) (‘‘Approval Order’’); 63041 (October 5,
reasons discussed above. Accordingly, previously filed with the Commission 2010), 75 FR 62905 (October 13, 2010) (SR–
the Commission finds good cause to pursuant to Rule 19b-4 relating to the NYSEArca-2010–86) (Notice of Filing of Proposed
approve the proposed rule change, as Rule Change Relating to the Listing and Trading of
Peritus High Yield ETF (the ‘‘Fund’’). Shares of the Peritus High Yield ETF) (‘‘Notice’’).
modified by Amendment No. 1 pursuant Shares of the Fund are currently listed The Exchange subsequently filed with the
to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act.48 and traded on the Exchange under Commission several proposed rule changes relating
NYSE Arca Rule 8.600–E. The proposed to changes in the Fund’s holdings. See Securities
V. Conclusion Exchange Act Release Nos. 66818 (April 17, 2012),
rule change is available on the 77 FR 24233 (April 23, 2012) (SR–NYSEArca–2012–
On the basis of the foregoing, the Exchange’s website at www.nyse.com, at 33) (Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Commission finds that the proposed the principal office of the Exchange, and Proposed Rule Change relating to the Peritus High
at the Commission’s Public Reference Yield ETF); 70284 (August 29, 2013), 78 FR 54715
rule change, as modified by Amendment (September 5, 2013) (SR–NYSEArca–2013–83)
No. 1, is consistent with the Room. (Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
requirements of the Act, in particular II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Proposed Rule Change Relating to Investments in
with the requirements of Section 17A of Leveraged Loans by the Peritus High Yield ETF);
Statement of the Purpose of, and 72433 (June 19, 2014), 79 FR 36114 (June 25, 2014)
the Act 49 and Rule 17Ad–22(e)(1) Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule (SR–NYSEArca–2014–69) (Notice of Filing and
thereunder. Change Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Relating to Holdings in Equity Securities by the
In its filing with the Commission, the Peritus High Yield ETF); 73181 (September 23,
Section 19(b)(2) 50 of the Act, that the self-regulatory organization included 2014), 79 FR 58001 (September 26, 2014) (SR–
proposed rule change (SR–OCC–2018– statements concerning the purpose of, NYSEArca–2014–103) (Notice of Filing and
007) be, and it hereby is, approved. and basis for, the proposed rule change
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Relating to an Increase in the Number of Securities
and discussed any comments it received Held by the Peritus High Yield ETF). (The Approval
48 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
on the proposed rule change. The text Order, Notice and other proposed rule changes
49 Inapproving this proposed rule change, the referenced above are referred to collectively herein
Commission has considered the proposed rule’s of those statements may be examined at as the ‘‘Releases’’).
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital 6 The Trust is registered under the 1940 Act. On
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 1 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1). November 1, 2017, the Trust filed with the
50 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). 2 15 U.S.C. 78a. Commission an amendment to its registration
51 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 3 17 CFR 240.19b–4. Continued
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:46 May 30, 2018 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00128 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31MYN1.SGM 31MYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_25192/page/7.svg)
Document Created: 2018-05-31 00:49:00
Document Modified: 2018-05-31 00:49:00
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 25087 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR