83 FR 25378 - Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia; Emissions Statement Rule Certification for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 106 (June 1, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 106 (June 1, 2018)
| Page Range | 25378-25382 | |
| FR Document | 2018-11570 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 106 (Friday, June 1, 2018)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 25378-25382] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-11570] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R03-OAR-2017-0738; FRL-9978-57--Region 3] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia; Emissions Statement Rule Certification for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a state implementation plan (SIP) revision formally submitted by the Commonwealth of Virginia (Virginia or the Commonwealth). Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), states' SIPs must require stationary sources in ozone nonattainment areas classified as marginal or above to report annual emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOX ) and volatile organic compounds (VOC). This emissions statement requirement also applies to stationary sources located in the Ozone Transport Region (OTR) that emit or have the potential to emit at least 50 tons per year (tpy) of VOC or 100 tpy of NOX . The SIP revision provides Virginia's certification that its existing emissions statement program satisfies the emissions statement requirements of the CAA for the 2008 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). EPA is approving Virginia's emissions statement program certification for the 2008 ozone NAAQS as a SIP revision in accordance with the requirements of the CAA. DATES: This final rule is effective on July 2, 2018. ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID Number EPA-R03-OAR-2017-0738. All documents in the docket are listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in the For Further Information Contact section for additional availability information. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara Calcinore, (215) 814 2043, or by email at [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background Under the CAA, EPA establishes NAAQS for criteria pollutants in order to protect human health and the environment. In response to scientific evidence linking ozone exposure to adverse health effects, EPA promulgated the first ozone NAAQS, the 0.12 part per million (ppm) 1-hour ozone NAAQS, in 1979. See 44 FR 8202 (February 8, 1979). The CAA requires EPA to review and reevaluate the NAAQS every 5 years in order to consider updated information regarding the effects of the criteria pollutants on human health and the environment. On July 18, 1997, EPA promulgated a revised ozone NAAQS, referred to as the 1997 ozone NAAQS, of 0.08 ppm averaged over eight hours. 62 FR 38855. This 8-hour ozone NAAQS was determined to be more protective of public health than the previous 1979 1-hour ozone NAAQS. In 2008, EPA strengthened the 8-hour ozone NAAQS from 0.08 to 0.075 ppm. The 0.075 ppm standard is referred to as the 2008 ozone NAAQS. See 73 FR 16436 (March 27, 2008). On May 21, 2012 and June 11, 2012, EPA designated nonattainment areas for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. 77 FR 30088 and 77 FR 34221. Effective July 20, 2012, the Washington, DC-MD-VA area was designated as marginal nonattainment for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. The Virginia portion of the Washington, DC-MD-VA nonattainment area is comprised of Arlington County, Fairfax County, Loudoun County, Prince William County, Alexandria City, Fairfax City, Falls Church City, Manassas City, and Manassas Park City. See 40 CFR 81.347. Section 182 of the CAA identifies additional plan submissions and requirements for ozone nonattainment areas. Specifically, section 182(a)(3)(B) of the CAA requires that states develop and submit, as a revision to their SIP, rules which establish annual reporting requirements for certain stationary sources. Sources that are within marginal or above ozone nonattainment areas must annually report the actual emissions of NOX and VOC to the state. However, states may waive sources that emit under 25 tpy of NOX and VOC if the state provides an inventory of emissions from such class or category of sources as required by CAA sections 172 and 182. See CAA section 182(a)(3)(B)(ii). Additionally, portions of Virginia are included in the ozone transport region (OTR) established by Congress in section 184 of the CAA. The OTR is comprised of the states of Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, and the Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area that includes the District of Columbia and portions of Virginia. The areas designated as in the Virginia portion of the OTR are as follows: Arlington County, Fairfax County, Loudoun County, Prince William County, Stafford County, Alexandria City, Fairfax City, Falls Church City, Manassas City, and Manassas Park City.\1\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See, e.g. ``Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia; NSR in the Ozone Transport Region'', 71 FR 39570 (July 13, 2006) and 71 FR 890 (January 6, 2006). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to section 184(b)(2), any stationary source located in the OTR that emits or has the potential to emit at least 50 tpy of VOC shall be considered a major stationary source [[Page 25379]] and subject to the requirements which would be applicable to major stationary sources if the area was classified as a moderate nonattainment area. See CAA section 184. Thus, states within the OTR are subject to plan (or SIP) requirements in CAA section 182(b) applicable to moderate nonattainment areas. Also, section 182(f)(1) of the CAA requires that the plan provisions required for major stationary sources of VOC also apply to major stationary sources of NOX for states with ozone nonattainment areas. A major stationary source of NOX is defined as a stationary facility or source of air pollutants which directly emits, or has the potential to emit, 100 tpy or more of NOX . See CAA section 302(j). In summary, sources located within the portions of Virginia included in the OTR, including areas designated as attainment for the 2008 ozone NAAQS, that emit more than 50 tpy of VOC or 100 tpy of NOX are considered major sources and are subject to the same requirements as major stationary sources located in moderate or above nonattainment areas. These requirements include the emissions statement requirements of CAA section 182(a)(3)(B). See CAA section 182(f) and 184(b)(2). Sources located in designated marginal or above nonattainment areas must also submit an emissions statement as required by CAA section 182(a)(3)(B). As stated previously, states may waive sources that emit less than the 25 tpy of NOX and 25 tpy of VOC threshold if the state provides an inventory of emissions from such class or category of sources as required by CAA sections 172 and 182. See CAA section 182(a)(3)(B)(ii). States are required by section 182(a)(3)(B) of the CAA to submit, for approval into the state's SIP, rules requiring the sources described above to provide annual statements showing their actual emissions of NOX and VOC to the state. The EPA published guidance on source emissions statements in a July 1992 memorandum titled, ``Guidance on the Implementation of an Emission Statement Program'' and in a March 14, 2006 memorandum titled, ``Emission Statement Requirements Under 8-hour Ozone NAAQS Implementation'' (2006 memorandum). In addition, on March 6, 2015, EPA issued a final rule addressing a range of nonattainment area SIP requirements for the 2008 ozone NAAQS, including the emissions statement requirements of CAA section 182(a)(3)(B) (2015 final rule). 80 FR 12264. The 2006 memorandum clarified that the source emissions statement requirement of CAA section 182(a)(3)(B) was applicable to all areas designated nonattainment for the 1997 ozone NAAQS and classified as marginal or above under subpart 2, part D, title I of the CAA. Per EPA's 2015 final rule, the source emissions statement requirement also applies to all areas designated nonattainment for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. According to EPA's 2015 final rule, most areas that are required to have an emissions statement program for the 2008 ozone NAAQS already have one in place due to a nonattainment designation for an earlier ozone NAAQS. EPA's 2015 final rule states that, ``If an area has a previously approved emissions statement rule in force for the 1997 ozone NAAQS or the 1-hour ozone NAAQS that covers all portions of the nonattainment area for the 2008 ozone NAAQS, such rule should be sufficient for purposes of the emissions statement requirement for the 2008 ozone NAAQS.'' In cases where an existing emissions statement rule is still adequate to meet the emissions statement requirement under the 2008 ozone NAAQS, states may provide the rationale for that determination to EPA in a written statement for approval into the SIP to meet the requirements of CAA section 182(a)(3)(B). In this statement, states should identify how the emissions statement requirements of CAA section 182(a)(3)(B) are met by their existing emissions statement rule. In summary, Virginia is required to submit, as a formal revision to its SIP, a statement certifying that Virginia's existing emissions statement program satisfies the requirements of CAA section 182(a)(3)(B) and covers the Washington, DC-MD-VA nonattainment area for the 2008 ozone NAAQS.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ EPA did not require Virginia or other states to certify that its existing SIP-approved emissions statement program continued to satisfy CAA requirements for areas in the OTR to have an emissions statement program. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA Analysis On August 1, 2017, the Commonwealth of Virginia, through the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VADEQ), submitted, as a formal revision to its SIP, a statement certifying that Virginia's existing SIP-approved emissions statement program covers the Virginia portion of the Washington, DC-MD-VA nonattainment area for the 2008 ozone NAAQS and is at least as stringent as the requirements of CAA section 182(a)(3)(B). In its submittal, Virginia states that the emissions statement requirements of CAA section 182(a)(3)(B) are contained under 9VAC5-20-160 (Registration) of the Virginia Administrative Code and are SIP-approved under 40 CFR 52.2420(c). According to Virginia, these provisions mandate that facilities emitting more than 25 tpy of NOX or VOC must submit emission statements to Virginia while those emitting less than 25 tpy must comply with inventory requirements. The provisions under 9VAC5-20-160 that implement Virginia's emissions statement program were approved into the Virginia SIP on May 2, 1995 (60 FR 21451).\3\ These provisions require the owner of any stationary source that emits 25 tpy or more of VOC or NOX and is located in an emissions control area designated under 9VAC5-20- 206 (Volatile Organic Compound and Nitrogen Oxides Emissions Control Areas) to submit an emissions statement to the Virginia State Air Pollution Control Board by April 15 of each year for the emissions discharged during the previous calendar year.\4\ Emissions statements are required to be prepared and submitted in accordance with 9VAC5-20- 121 (Air Quality Program Policies and Procedures), which references Virginia's January 1, 1993 document AQP-8 titled, ``Procedures for Preparing and Submitting Emission Statements for Stationary Sources.'' The provisions under 9VAC5-20-121 were [[Page 25380]] also approved into the Virginia SIP on May 2, 1995 (60 FR 21451). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ The provisions under 9VAC5-20-160 were derived from VR120- 02-31. EPA's May 2, 1995 direct final rulemaking (DFR) approved a SIP revision submitted by the Commonwealth of Virginia requesting the addition of provisions under VR120-02-31 paragraph B, which established Virginia's emissions statement program, and Appendix S (Air Quality Program Policies and Procedures), which described the procedure for preparing and submitting emissions statements for stationary sources, to the Virginia SIP. See 60 FR 21451. On March 6, 1992, the Virginia State Assembly enacted Chapter 216--an act to amend Section 9--77.7, Code of Virginia, which authorized reorganization of the Virginia Administrative Code, including reorganization of the air pollution control regulations, effective July 1, 1992. Beginning April 17, 1995, Virginia began publication of its air quality control regulations in the new format. On April 21, 2000, EPA approved a SIP revision from Virginia requesting the reorganization and renumbering of the Virginia SIP to match the recodification of Virginia's air pollution control regulations under the Virginia Administrative Code. See 65 FR 21315. As a result, the SIP-approved provisions under VR120-02-31 and Appendix S are now under 9VAC5-20-160 and 9VAC5-20-121, respectively. \4\ The emissions control areas defined under 9VAC5-20-206 include the Northern Virginia Emissions Control Area, the Fredericksburg Emissions Control Area, the Richmond Emissions Control Area, the Hampton Roads Emissions Control Area, and the Western Virginia Emissions Control Area. The Northern Virginia Emissions Control Area consists of the localities of Arlington County, Fairfax County, Loudoun County, Prince William County, Stafford County, Alexandra City, Fairfax City, Falls Church City, Manassas City, and Manassas Park City. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- EPA's review of the Commonwealth of Virginia's submittal finds that Virginia's existing, SIP-approved emissions statement program under 9VAC5-20-160 satisfies the requirements of CAA section 182(a)(3)(B) for emission statements for sources located in marginal or above nonattainment areas including such sources in the Virginia portion of the Washington, DC-MD-VA nonattainment area for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. EPA notes 9VAC5-20-160 also requires sources located in portions of Virginia included in the OTR to submit required emission statements in accordance with CAA section 184 (OTR requirements) and 182 (plan submissions and requirements for ozone nonattainment areas). Pursuant to CAA sections 182 and 184, Virginia is required to have an emissions statement program for sources located in marginal or above nonattainment areas and the portions of Virginia included in the OTR. EPA finds the provisions under 9VAC5-20-160 satisfy these requirements of CAA sections 182 and 184 because they apply to the Northern Virginia Emissions Control Area, which includes the Virginia localities within the Virginia portion of the Washington, DC-MD-VA nonattainment area for the 2008 ozone NAAQS (i.e., Arlington County, Fairfax County, Loudoun County, Prince William County, Alexandria City, Fairfax City, Falls Church City, Manassas City, and Manassas Park City), and the portions of Virginia included in the OTR (i.e., Arlington County, Fairfax County, Loudoun County, Prince William County, Stafford County, Alexandria City, Fairfax City, Falls Church City, Manassas City, and Manassas Park City). EPA also finds Virginia's emissions thresholds for sources that are required to submit an emissions statement meet the requirements of CAA sections 182 and 184. As stated above, 9VAC5-20-160 requires the owner of any stationary source located in an emissions control area that emits 25 tpy or more of VOC or NOX to annually submit an emissions statement. This 25 tpy threshold is equivalent to the threshold required by CAA section 182. As previously mentioned, per CAA section 182(a)(3)(B)(ii), states may waive sources that emit less than 25 tpy of NOX or VOC if the state provides an inventory of emissions from such class or category of sources as required by CAA sections 172 and 182. Virginia does provide emissions inventories for nonattainment areas as required by CAA section 172(c)(3).\5\ Therefore, EPA has determined that 9VAC5-20-160, which is currently in the Virginia SIP, is appropriate to address the emissions statement requirements in section 182(a)(3)(B) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See, e.g., ``Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia; 2011 Base Year Emissions Inventories for the Washington DC-MD-VA Nonattainment Area for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard,'' 80 FR 27255 (May 13, 2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On March 12, 2018 (83 FR 10652), EPA published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) for the Commonwealth of Virginia. In the NPR, EPA found the Commonwealth's August 1, 2017 emissions statement program certification to be approvable under CAA section 182(a)(3)(B) and proposed to approve it as a revision to the Virginia SIP. EPA received public comments on our March 12, 2018 proposal to approve Virginia's emissions statement certification for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. All of the submitted comments were either supportive of or not specific to this action and thus are not addressed here. III. Final Action EPA is approving the Commonwealth's August 1, 2017 emissions statement program certification as a revision to the Virginia SIP. IV. General Information Pertaining to SIP Submittals From the Commonwealth of Virginia In 1995, Virginia adopted legislation that provides, subject to certain conditions, for an environmental assessment (audit) ``privilege'' for voluntary compliance evaluations performed by a regulated entity. The legislation further addresses the relative burden of proof for parties either asserting the privilege or seeking disclosure of documents for which the privilege is claimed. Virginia's legislation also provides, subject to certain conditions, for a penalty waiver for violations of environmental laws when a regulated entity discovers such violations pursuant to a voluntary compliance evaluation and voluntarily discloses such violations to the Commonwealth and takes prompt and appropriate measures to remedy the violations. Virginia's Voluntary Environmental Assessment Privilege Law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1- 1198, provides a privilege that protects from disclosure documents and information about the content of those documents that are the product of a voluntary environmental assessment. The Privilege Law does not extend to documents or information that: (1) Are generated or developed before the commencement of a voluntary environmental assessment; (2) are prepared independently of the assessment process; (3) demonstrate a clear, imminent and substantial danger to the public health or environment; or (4) are required by law. On January 12, 1998, the Commonwealth of Virginia Office of the Attorney General provided a legal opinion that states that the Privilege law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1-1198, precludes granting a privilege to documents and information ``required by law,'' including documents and information ``required by federal law to maintain program delegation, authorization or approval,'' since Virginia must ``enforce federally authorized environmental programs in a manner that is no less stringent than their federal counterparts. . . .'' The opinion concludes that ``[r]egarding Sec. 10.1-1198, therefore, documents or other information needed for civil or criminal enforcement under one of these programs could not be privileged because such documents and information are essential to pursuing enforcement in a manner required by federal law to maintain program delegation, authorization or approval.'' Virginia's Immunity law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1-1199, provides that ``[t]o the extent consistent with requirements imposed by federal law,'' any person making a voluntary disclosure of information to a state agency regarding a violation of an environmental statute, regulation, permit, or administrative order is granted immunity from administrative or civil penalty. The Attorney General's January 12, 1998 opinion states that the quoted language renders this statute inapplicable to enforcement of any federally authorized programs, since ``no immunity could be afforded from administrative, civil, or criminal penalties because granting such immunity would not be consistent with federal law, which is one of the criteria for immunity.'' Therefore, EPA has determined that Virginia's Privilege and Immunity statutes will not preclude the Commonwealth from enforcing its program consistent with the federal requirements. In any event, because EPA has also determined that a state audit privilege and immunity law can affect only state enforcement and cannot have any impact on federal enforcement authorities, EPA may at any time invoke its authority under the CAA, including, for example, sections 113, 167, 205, 211 or 213, to enforce the requirements or [[Page 25381]] prohibitions of the state plan, independently of any state enforcement effort. In addition, citizen enforcement under section 304 of the CAA is likewise unaffected by this, or any, state audit privilege or immunity law. V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews A. General Requirements Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under Executive Order 12866. does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151 or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). C. Petitions for Judicial Review Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 31, 2018. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action approving Virginia's certification that its existing SIP-approved emissions statement program under 9VAC5-20-160 satisfies the requirements of CAA section 182(a)(3)(B) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: May 15, 2018. Cosmo Servidio, Regional Administrator, Region III. 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 0 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart VV--Virginia 0 2. In Sec. 52.2420, the table in paragraph (e)(1) is amended by adding the entry ``Emissions Statement Rule Certification for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS'' at the end of the table to read as follows: Sec. 52.2420 Identification of plan. * * * * * (e) * * * (1) * * * [[Page 25382]] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name of non-regulatory SIP Applicable geographic State Additional revision area submittal date EPA approval date explanation ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * Emissions Statement Rule Virginia portion of the 8/01/17 6/01/18, [Insert Certification that Certification for the 2008 Washington, DC-MD-VA Federal Register Virginia's Ozone NAAQS. nonattainment area for citation]. previously SIP- the 2008 ozone NAAQS approved (i.e., Arlington regulations at County, Fairfax 9VAC5-20-160 meet County, Loudoun the emissions County, Prince William statement County, Alexandria requirements of City, Fairfax City, CAA section Falls Church City, 182(a)(3)(B) for Manassas City, and the 2008 ozone Manassas Park City) as NAAQS. well as the portions of Virginia included in the Ozone Transport Region (OTR) (i.e., Arlington County, Fairfax County, Loudoun County, Prince William County, Stafford County, Alexandria City, Fairfax City, Falls Church City, Manassas City, and Manassas Park City). ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * [FR Doc. 2018-11570 Filed 5-31-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![25378 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
EPA—APPROVED MICHIGAN NONREGULATORY AND QUASI-REGULATORY PROVISIONS
Applicable State
geographic or
Name of nonregulatory SIP provision submittal EPA approval date Comments
nonattainment date
area
* * * * * * *
Regional Haze Progress Report .................. Statewide .......... 1/12/2016 6/1/2018, [insert Federal Register citation]
* * * * * * *
[FR Doc. 2018–11566 Filed 5–31–18; 8:45 am] website. Although listed in the index, NAAQS. The Virginia portion of the
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P some information is not publicly Washington, DC–MD–VA
available, e.g., confidential business nonattainment area is comprised of
information (CBI) or other information Arlington County, Fairfax County,
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Loudoun County, Prince William
AGENCY Certain other material, such as County, Alexandria City, Fairfax City,
copyrighted material, is not placed on Falls Church City, Manassas City, and
40 CFR Part 52 the internet and will be publicly Manassas Park City. See 40 CFR 81.347.
[EPA–R03–OAR–2017–0738; FRL–9978– available only in hard copy form. Section 182 of the CAA identifies
57—Region 3] Publicly available docket materials are additional plan submissions and
available through https:// requirements for ozone nonattainment
Approval and Promulgation of Air www.regulations.gov, or please contact areas. Specifically, section 182(a)(3)(B)
Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia; the person identified in the FOR FURTHER of the CAA requires that states develop
Emissions Statement Rule Certification INFORMATION CONTACT section for and submit, as a revision to their SIP,
for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient additional availability information. rules which establish annual reporting
Air Quality Standard FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara requirements for certain stationary
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Calcinore, (215) 814 2043, or by email sources. Sources that are within
Agency (EPA). at calcinore.sara@epa.gov. marginal or above ozone nonattainment
ACTION: Final rule. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
areas must annually report the actual
emissions of NOX and VOC to the state.
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection I. Background However, states may waive sources that
Agency (EPA) is approving a state Under the CAA, EPA establishes emit under 25 tpy of NOX and VOC if
implementation plan (SIP) revision NAAQS for criteria pollutants in order the state provides an inventory of
formally submitted by the to protect human health and the emissions from such class or category of
Commonwealth of Virginia (Virginia or environment. In response to scientific sources as required by CAA sections 172
the Commonwealth). Under the Clean evidence linking ozone exposure to and 182. See CAA section
Air Act (CAA), states’ SIPs must require adverse health effects, EPA promulgated 182(a)(3)(B)(ii).
stationary sources in ozone the first ozone NAAQS, the 0.12 part per Additionally, portions of Virginia are
nonattainment areas classified as million (ppm) 1-hour ozone NAAQS, in included in the ozone transport region
marginal or above to report annual 1979. See 44 FR 8202 (February 8, (OTR) established by Congress in
emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOX) and 1979). The CAA requires EPA to review section 184 of the CAA. The OTR is
volatile organic compounds (VOC). This and reevaluate the NAAQS every 5 comprised of the states of Connecticut,
emissions statement requirement also years in order to consider updated Delaware, Maine, Maryland,
applies to stationary sources located in information regarding the effects of the Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New
the Ozone Transport Region (OTR) that criteria pollutants on human health and Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, and the
emit or have the potential to emit at the environment. On July 18, 1997, EPA Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical
least 50 tons per year (tpy) of VOC or promulgated a revised ozone NAAQS, Area that includes the District of
100 tpy of NOX. The SIP revision referred to as the 1997 ozone NAAQS, Columbia and portions of Virginia. The
provides Virginia’s certification that its of 0.08 ppm averaged over eight hours. areas designated as in the Virginia
existing emissions statement program 62 FR 38855. This 8-hour ozone NAAQS portion of the OTR are as follows:
satisfies the emissions statement was determined to be more protective of Arlington County, Fairfax County,
requirements of the CAA for the 2008 public health than the previous 1979 1- Loudoun County, Prince William
ozone National Ambient Air Quality hour ozone NAAQS. In 2008, EPA County, Stafford County, Alexandria
Standards (NAAQS). EPA is approving strengthened the 8-hour ozone NAAQS City, Fairfax City, Falls Church City,
Virginia’s emissions statement program from 0.08 to 0.075 ppm. The 0.075 ppm Manassas City, and Manassas Park
certification for the 2008 ozone NAAQS standard is referred to as the 2008 ozone City.1
as a SIP revision in accordance with the NAAQS. See 73 FR 16436 (March 27, Pursuant to section 184(b)(2), any
requirements of the CAA. 2008). stationary source located in the OTR
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with RULES
DATES: This final rule is effective on July On May 21, 2012 and June 11, 2012, that emits or has the potential to emit
2, 2018. EPA designated nonattainment areas for at least 50 tpy of VOC shall be
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a the 2008 ozone NAAQS. 77 FR 30088 considered a major stationary source
docket for this action under Docket ID and 77 FR 34221. Effective July 20, 1 See, e.g. ‘‘Approval and Promulgation of Air
Number EPA–R03–OAR–2017–0738. All 2012, the Washington, DC–MD–VA area Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia; NSR in the
documents in the docket are listed on was designated as marginal Ozone Transport Region’’, 71 FR 39570 (July 13,
the https://www.regulations.gov nonattainment for the 2008 ozone 2006) and 71 FR 890 (January 6, 2006).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:47 May 31, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\01JNR1.SGM 01JNR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_25484/page/1.svg)
![25380 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
also approved into the Virginia SIP on section 172(c)(3).5 Therefore, EPA has assessment. The Privilege Law does not
May 2, 1995 (60 FR 21451). determined that 9VAC5–20–160, which extend to documents or information
EPA’s review of the Commonwealth is currently in the Virginia SIP, is that: (1) Are generated or developed
of Virginia’s submittal finds that appropriate to address the emissions before the commencement of a
Virginia’s existing, SIP-approved statement requirements in section voluntary environmental assessment; (2)
emissions statement program under 182(a)(3)(B) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. are prepared independently of the
9VAC5–20–160 satisfies the On March 12, 2018 (83 FR 10652), assessment process; (3) demonstrate a
requirements of CAA section EPA published a notice of proposed clear, imminent and substantial danger
182(a)(3)(B) for emission statements for rulemaking (NPR) for the to the public health or environment; or
sources located in marginal or above Commonwealth of Virginia. In the NPR, (4) are required by law.
nonattainment areas including such EPA found the Commonwealth’s August On January 12, 1998, the
sources in the Virginia portion of the 1, 2017 emissions statement program Commonwealth of Virginia Office of the
Washington, DC–MD–VA certification to be approvable under Attorney General provided a legal
nonattainment area for the 2008 ozone CAA section 182(a)(3)(B) and proposed opinion that states that the Privilege
NAAQS. EPA notes 9VAC5–20–160 also to approve it as a revision to the law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1–1198, precludes
requires sources located in portions of Virginia SIP. granting a privilege to documents and
Virginia included in the OTR to submit EPA received public comments on our information ‘‘required by law,’’
required emission statements in March 12, 2018 proposal to approve including documents and information
accordance with CAA section 184 (OTR Virginia’s emissions statement ‘‘required by federal law to maintain
requirements) and 182 (plan certification for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. program delegation, authorization or
submissions and requirements for ozone All of the submitted comments were approval,’’ since Virginia must ‘‘enforce
nonattainment areas). Pursuant to CAA either supportive of or not specific to federally authorized environmental
sections 182 and 184, Virginia is this action and thus are not addressed programs in a manner that is no less
required to have an emissions statement here. stringent than their federal
program for sources located in marginal counterparts. . . .’’ The opinion
III. Final Action concludes that ‘‘[r]egarding § 10.1–1198,
or above nonattainment areas and the
portions of Virginia included in the EPA is approving the therefore, documents or other
OTR. EPA finds the provisions under Commonwealth’s August 1, 2017 information needed for civil or criminal
9VAC5–20–160 satisfy these emissions statement program enforcement under one of these
requirements of CAA sections 182 and certification as a revision to the Virginia programs could not be privileged
184 because they apply to the Northern SIP. because such documents and
Virginia Emissions Control Area, which information are essential to pursuing
IV. General Information Pertaining to
includes the Virginia localities within enforcement in a manner required by
SIP Submittals From the
the Virginia portion of the Washington, federal law to maintain program
Commonwealth of Virginia
DC–MD–VA nonattainment area for the delegation, authorization or approval.’’
In 1995, Virginia adopted legislation Virginia’s Immunity law, Va. Code
2008 ozone NAAQS (i.e., Arlington
that provides, subject to certain Sec. 10.1–1199, provides that ‘‘[t]o the
County, Fairfax County, Loudoun
conditions, for an environmental extent consistent with requirements
County, Prince William County,
assessment (audit) ‘‘privilege’’ for imposed by federal law,’’ any person
Alexandria City, Fairfax City, Falls
voluntary compliance evaluations making a voluntary disclosure of
Church City, Manassas City, and
performed by a regulated entity. The information to a state agency regarding
Manassas Park City), and the portions of a violation of an environmental statute,
legislation further addresses the relative
Virginia included in the OTR (i.e., regulation, permit, or administrative
burden of proof for parties either
Arlington County, Fairfax County, order is granted immunity from
asserting the privilege or seeking
Loudoun County, Prince William administrative or civil penalty. The
disclosure of documents for which the
County, Stafford County, Alexandria Attorney General’s January 12, 1998
privilege is claimed. Virginia’s
City, Fairfax City, Falls Church City, opinion states that the quoted language
legislation also provides, subject to
Manassas City, and Manassas Park City). renders this statute inapplicable to
certain conditions, for a penalty waiver
EPA also finds Virginia’s emissions enforcement of any federally authorized
for violations of environmental laws
thresholds for sources that are required programs, since ‘‘no immunity could be
when a regulated entity discovers such
to submit an emissions statement meet afforded from administrative, civil, or
violations pursuant to a voluntary
the requirements of CAA sections 182 criminal penalties because granting
compliance evaluation and voluntarily
and 184. As stated above, 9VAC5–20– such immunity would not be consistent
discloses such violations to the
160 requires the owner of any stationary with federal law, which is one of the
Commonwealth and takes prompt and
source located in an emissions control criteria for immunity.’’
appropriate measures to remedy the
area that emits 25 tpy or more of VOC Therefore, EPA has determined that
violations. Virginia’s Voluntary
or NOX to annually submit an emissions Virginia’s Privilege and Immunity
Environmental Assessment Privilege
statement. This 25 tpy threshold is Law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1–1198, provides statutes will not preclude the
equivalent to the threshold required by a privilege that protects from disclosure Commonwealth from enforcing its
CAA section 182. As previously documents and information about the program consistent with the federal
mentioned, per CAA section content of those documents that are the requirements. In any event, because
182(a)(3)(B)(ii), states may waive product of a voluntary environmental EPA has also determined that a state
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with RULES
sources that emit less than 25 tpy of audit privilege and immunity law can
NOX or VOC if the state provides an 5 See, e.g., ‘‘Approval and Promulgation of Air affect only state enforcement and cannot
inventory of emissions from such class Quality Implementation Plans; District of Columbia, have any impact on federal enforcement
or category of sources as required by Maryland, and Virginia; 2011 Base Year Emissions authorities, EPA may at any time invoke
CAA sections 172 and 182. Virginia Inventories for the Washington DC–MD–VA
Nonattainment Area for the 2008 Ozone National
its authority under the CAA, including,
does provide emissions inventories for Ambient Air Quality Standard,’’ 80 FR 27255 (May for example, sections 113, 167, 205, 211
nonattainment areas as required by CAA 13, 2015). or 213, to enforce the requirements or
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:47 May 31, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\01JNR1.SGM 01JNR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_25484/page/3.svg)
![25382 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 106 / Friday, June 1, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Name of State submittal EPA approval
non-regulatory Applicable geographic area Additional explanation
date date
SIP revision
* * * * * * *
Emissions State- Virginia portion of the Washington, DC–MD–VA nonattain- 8/01/17 6/01/18, [In- Certification that Virginia’s
ment Rule Cer- ment area for the 2008 ozone NAAQS (i.e., Arlington sert Federal previously SIP-approved
tification for the County, Fairfax County, Loudoun County, Prince Wil- Register ci- regulations at 9VAC5–20–
2008 Ozone liam County, Alexandria City, Fairfax City, Falls Church tation]. 160 meet the emissions
NAAQS. City, Manassas City, and Manassas Park City) as well statement requirements of
as the portions of Virginia included in the Ozone Trans- CAA section 182(a)(3)(B)
port Region (OTR) (i.e., Arlington County, Fairfax Coun- for the 2008 ozone
ty, Loudoun County, Prince William County, Stafford NAAQS.
County, Alexandria City, Fairfax City, Falls Church City,
Manassas City, and Manassas Park City).
* * * * * web pages in the ‘‘What does this action Duplicates of required documents
[FR Doc. 2018–11570 Filed 5–31–18; 8:45 am] do?’’ section of this document. must also continue to be submitted to
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P DATES: This document is effective on the EPA Regional Office at the above
June 1, 2018. The dates of delegation address.
can be found in the SUPPLEMENTARY FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INFORMATION section of this document.
AGENCY Paula Higbee at (913) 551–7028, or by
ADDRESSES: Copies of documents email at higbee.paula@epa.gov.
40 CFR Parts 60, 61, and 63 relative to this action are available for
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
public inspection during normal
supplementary information is organized
business hours at the Environmental
[EPA–R07–OAR–2018–0021; FRL–9978– in the following order:
80—Region 7] Protection Agency, Air Planning and
Development Branch, 11201 Renner I. What does this action do?
Road, Lenexa, Kansas 66219. The II. What is the authority for delegation?
Delegation of Authority to the States of III. What does delegation accomplish?
Iowa; Kansas; Missouri; Nebraska; interested persons wanting to examine
IV. What has been delegated?
Lincoln-Lancaster County, NE; and these documents should make an V. What has not been delegated?
City of Omaha, NE, for New Source appointment with the office at least 24
Performance Standards (NSPS), hours in advance. List of Delegation Tables
National Emission Standards for Effective immediately, all Table I—NSPS, 40 CFR part 60
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) notifications, applications, reports, and Table II—NESHAP, 40 CFR part 61
Including Maximum Achievable other correspondence required pursuant Table III—NESHAP, 40 CFR part 63
Control Technology (MACT) Standards to the newly delegated standards and
revisions identified in this document I. What does this action do?
AGENCY: Environmental Protection must be submitted with respect to EPA is providing notice of an update
Agency (EPA). sources located in the jurisdictions to its delegable authority for
ACTION: Delegation of authority. identified in this document, to the implementation and enforcement of the
following addresses: Federal standards shown in the tables
SUMMARY: The States of Iowa, Kansas, Iowa Department of Natural below to the states of Iowa, Kansas,
Missouri, and Nebraska and the local Resources, Air Quality Bureau, Wallace Missouri, and Nebraska. This action
agencies of Lincoln-Lancaster County, State Office Building, 502 E 9th Street, updates the delegation tables previously
Nebraska, and the city of Omaha, Des Moines, Iowa 50319. published at 80 FR 10596 (February 27,
Nebraska, have submitted updated Kansas Department of Health and the 2015). EPA has established procedures
regulations for delegation of EPA Environment, Bureau of Air, 1000 SW by which these agencies are
authority for implementation and Jackson Street, Suite 310, Topeka, automatically delegated the authority to
enforcement of NSPS, NESHAP, and Kansas 66612–1367. implement the standards when they
MACT standards. The submissions Missouri Department of Natural adopt regulations which are identical to
cover new EPA standards and, in some Resources, Air Pollution Control the Federal standards. We then
instances, revisions to standards Program, PO Box 176, Jefferson City, periodically provide notice of the new
previously delegated. EPA’s review of Missouri 65102–0176. and revised standards for which
the pertinent regulations shows that Nebraska Department of delegation has been given. This
they contain adequate and effective Environmental Quality, Air Quality document does not affect or alter the
procedures for the implementation and Division, 1200 ‘‘N’’ Street, Suite 400, status of the listed standards under state
enforcement of these Federal standards. P.O. Box 98922, Lincoln, Nebraska or Federal law.
This action informs the public of 68509. For the current, most up-to-date,
delegations to the above-mentioned Lincoln-Lancaster County Health status of delegations to the above-
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with RULES
agencies. All sources subject to the Department, Division of Environmental mentioned agencies, please refer to the
requirements of EPA regulations are also Public Health, Air Quality Section, 3140 following web pages:
subject to the equivalent requirements ‘‘N’’ Street, Lincoln, Nebraska 68510
of the above-mentioned state or local City of Omaha, Public Works Iowa https://go.usa.gov/xQ8yQ
agencies. For the current, most up-to- Department, Air Quality Control Kansas https://go.usa.gov/xQ8yE
date, status of delegations to the above- Division, 5600 South 10th Street, Missouri https://go.usa.gov/xQ8ym
mentioned agencies, please refer to the Omaha, Nebraska 68107. Nebraska https://go.usa.gov/xQ8yy
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:47 May 31, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\01JNR1.SGM 01JNR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_25484/page/5.svg)
Document Created: 2018-06-01 01:29:36
Document Modified: 2018-06-01 01:29:36
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | This final rule is effective on July 2, 2018. | |
| Contact | Sara Calcinore, (215) 814 2043, or by email at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 25378 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR