83 FR 26038 - Draft Guidelines for Determining Age Appropriateness of Toys; Notice of Extension of Comment Period
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 108 (June 5, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 108 (June 5, 2018)
| Page Range | 26038-26039 | |
| FR Document | 2018-11994 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 5, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 26038-26039] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-11994] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION [Docket No. CPSC-2018-0006] Draft Guidelines for Determining Age Appropriateness of Toys; Notice of Extension of Comment Period AGENCY: U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. [[Page 26039]] ACTION: Extension of comment period. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Consumer Product Safety Commission (Commission or CPSC) published a notice of availability (NOA) in the Federal Register, announcing the availability of a draft document titled, ``Guidelines for Determining Age Appropriateness of Toys,'' on March 27, 2018. The Commission invited the public to submit comments on the draft guidelines; the comment period, as set in the NOA, ends on June 11, 2018. The Commission is extending the comment period until July 31, 2018. DATES: Submit comments by July 31, 2018. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. CPSC-2018- 0006, by any of the following methods: Electronic Submissions Submit electronic comments in the following way: Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. The Commission does not accept comments submitted by electronic mail (email), except through: http://www.regulations.gov. The Commission encourages you to submit electronic comments by using the Federal eRulemaking Portal, as described above. Written Submissions Submit written submissions in the following way: Mail/Hand delivery/Courier to: Office of the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone (301) 504-7923. Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name and docket number for this notice. All comments received may be posted without change, including any personal identifiers, contact information, or other personal information provided, to: http://www.regulations.gov. Do not submit confidential business information, trade secret information, or other sensitive or protected information electronically. Such information should be submitted in writing. Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to: http://www.regulations.gov and insert the Docket No. CPSC-2018-0006 into the ``Search'' box and follow the prompts. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 27, 2018, the Commission published an NOA in the Federal Register, announcing the availability of a draft document titled, ``Guidelines for Determining Age Appropriateness of Toys'' (83 FR 13121). The Commission invited the public to submit comments on the draft guidelines, and the comment period, as set in the NOA, ends on June 11, 2018. The Commission received a request to extend the comment period until the end of July 2018. The Commission is extending the comment period until July 31, 2018, to allow additional time for public comment on the draft guidelines. Alberta E. Mills, Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. [FR Doc. 2018-11994 Filed 6-4-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
![26038 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 5, 2018 / Notices
Border Rules (CBPRs) and the E.U.-U.S. I. The Free Flow of Information and organization, planning processes, or
Privacy Shield Arrangement.9 Jurisdiction intercessional work programs? If so,
Emerging Technologies and Trends: A. What are the challenges to the free what are they?
NTIA also advocates for policies that I. What, if any, action can NTIA take
flow of information online?
enable entrepreneurs and innovators to to help raise awareness about the IGF
B. Which foreign laws and policies
take risks and to find global markets for and foster stakeholder engagement?
restrict the free flow of information J. What role should multilateral
new digital products and services. This online? What is the impact on U.S.
advocacy often draws NTIA into organizations play in internet
companies and users in general? governance?
discussions about access to broadband C. Have courts in other countries
internet service, digital literacy, issued internet-related judgments that III. Privacy and Security
intellectual property, and technological apply national laws to the global A. In what ways are cybersecurity
standardization. Over the last decade, internet? What have been the practical threats harming international
these discussions have intensified, as effects on U.S. companies of such commerce? In what ways are the
many countries have invested greater judgements? What have the effects been responses to those threats harming
resources into developing national on users? international commerce?
innovation strategies, and have D. What are the challenges to freedom B. Which international venues are the
increasingly brought those ideas into of expression online? most appropriate to address questions of
international forums, such as APEC and E. What should be the role of all digital privacy? What privacy issues
the OECD. Over the coming years, these stakeholders globally—governments, should NTIA prioritize in those
discussions will increasingly focus on companies, technical experts, civil international venues?
issues such as the economic and social society and end users—in ensuring free
impacts of artificial intelligence, the IV. Emerging Technologies and Trends
expression online?
workforce changes brought on by F. What role can NTIA play in helping A. What emerging technologies and
automation and new internet-enabled to reduce restrictions on the free flow of trends should be the focus of
business models, and the growth of information over the internet and international policy discussions? Please
blockchain applications, to name a few. ensuring free expression online? provide specific examples.
NTIA welcomes comments on how OIA G. In which international B. In which international venues
should participate in international organizations or venues might NTIA should conversations about emerging
discussions of these issues, as well as most effectively advocate for the free technology and trends take place?
other issues related to emerging flow of information and freedom of Which international venues are the most
technologies and trends. expression? What specific actions effective? Which are the least effective?
should NTIA and the U.S. Government C. What are the current best practices
Request for Comments for promoting innovation and
take?
Instructions for Commenters: NTIA H. How might NTIA better assist with investment for emerging technologies?
invites comments on the full range of jurisdictional challenges on the Are these best practices universal, or are
questions presented by this Notice, internet? they dependent upon a country’s level
including issues that are not specifically of economic development? How should
raised. Commenters are encouraged to II. Multistakeholder Approach to NTIA promote these best practices?
address any or all of the following Internet Governance For any response, commenters may
questions. Comments that contain A. Does the multistakeholder wish to consider describing specific
references to specific court cases, approach continue to support an goals and actions that NTIA, the
studies, and/or research should include environment for the internet to grow Department, or the U.S. Government in
copies of the referenced materials with and thrive? If so, why? If not, why not? general, might take (on its own or in
the submitted comments. Commenters B. Are there public policy areas in conjunction with the private sector) to
should include the name of the person which the multistakeholder approach achieve those goals; the benefits and
or organization filing the comment, as works best? If yes, what are those areas costs associated with the action;
well as a page number on each page of and why? Are there areas in which the whether the proposal is agency-specific
their submissions. All comments multistakeholder approach does not or interagency; the rationale and
received are a part of the public record work effectively? If there are, what are evidence to support it; and the roles of
and will generally be posted on the those areas and why? other stakeholders.
NTIA website, http://www.ntia.doc. C. Are the existing accountability Dated: May 31, 2018.
gov/, without change. All personal structures within multistakeholder David J. Redl,
identifying information (for example, internet governance sufficient? If not, Assistant Secretary for Communications and
name or address) voluntarily submitted why not? What improvements can be Information.
by the commenter may be publicly made? [FR Doc. 2018–12075 Filed 6–4–18; 8:45 am]
accessible. Do not submit confidential D. Should the IANA Stewardship BILLING CODE 3510–60–P
business information or otherwise Transition be unwound? If yes, why and
sensitive or protected information. how? If not, why not?
E. What should be NTIA’s priorities CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
9 See Department of Commerce, Fact Sheet: within ICANN and the GAC? COMMISSION
Overview of the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework F. Are there any other DNS related
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
(Feb. 29, 2106), https://www.commerce.gov/news/ [Docket No. CPSC–2018–0006]
fact-sheets/2016/02/fact-sheet-overview-eu-us-
activities NTIA should pursue? If yes,
privacy-shield-framework; see also Department of please describe.
Draft Guidelines for Determining Age
Commerce, Press Release, Joint Press Statement G. Are there barriers to engagement at
from Secretary Ross and Commissioner Jourova on Appropriateness of Toys; Notice of
the IGF? If so, how can we lower these
the Privacy Shield Review (Sept. 20, 2017), https:// Extension of Comment Period
www.commerce.gov/news/press-releases/2017/09/
barriers?
joint-press-statement-secretary-ross-and- H. Are there improvements that can AGENCY:U.S. Consumer Product Safety
commissioner-jourova-privacy. be made to the IGF’s structure, Commission.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:19 Jun 04, 2018 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05JNN1.SGM 05JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_26146/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 5, 2018 / Notices 26039
ACTION: Extension of comment period. Toys’’ (83 FR 13121). The Commission Instructions: All submissions received
invited the public to submit comments must include the agency name, docket
SUMMARY: The Consumer Product Safety on the draft guidelines, and the number and title for this Federal
Commission (Commission or CPSC) comment period, as set in the NOA, Register document. The general policy
published a notice of availability (NOA) ends on June 11, 2018. The Commission for comments and other submissions
in the Federal Register, announcing the received a request to extend the from members of the public is to make
availability of a draft document titled, comment period until the end of July these submissions available for public
‘‘Guidelines for Determining Age 2018. The Commission is extending the viewing on the internet at http://
Appropriateness of Toys,’’ on March 27, comment period until July 31, 2018, to www.regulations.gov as they are
2018. The Commission invited the allow additional time for public received without change, including any
public to submit comments on the draft comment on the draft guidelines. personal identifiers or contact
guidelines; the comment period, as set information.
in the NOA, ends on June 11, 2018. The Alberta E. Mills,
Commission is extending the comment Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
period until July 31, 2018. Commission. request more information on this
[FR Doc. 2018–11994 Filed 6–4–18; 8:45 am] proposed information collection or to
DATES: Submit comments by July 31,
obtain a copy of the proposal and
2018. BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
associated collection instruments,
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, please write to Office of the Under
identified by Docket No. CPSC–2018– Secretary of Defense (Personnel and
0006, by any of the following methods: DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Readiness) (Military Personnel Policy),
Electronic Submissions ATTN: MAJ Kevin Bentz, 1500 Defense
Office of the Secretary
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301–1500
Submit electronic comments in the [Docket ID: DOD–2018–OS–0031] or call (703) 695–5527.
following way: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// Proposed Collection; Comment Title; Associated Form; and OMB
www.regulations.gov. Follow the Request Number: Report of Medical History; DD
instructions for submitting comments. Forms 2807–1 and 2807–2; OMB
The Commission does not accept AGENCY: Office of the Under Secretary of
Defense for Personnel and Readiness, Control Number 0704–0413.
comments submitted by electronic mail Needs and Uses: The information
(email), except through: http:// DoD.
collection requirement is necessary per
www.regulations.gov. The Commission ACTION: Information collection notice. Title 10 U.S.C. Chapter 31: Sections 504
encourages you to submit electronic and 505, and Chapter 33, Section 532,
comments by using the Federal SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the which requires applicants to meet
eRulemaking Portal, as described above. accession medical standards prior to
Office of the Undersecretary for
Written Submissions Personnel and Readiness announces a enlistment into the Armed Forces,
proposed public information collection including the Coast Guard. If applicants’
Submit written submissions in the medical history reveals a medical
following way: and seeks public comment on the
provisions thereof. Comments are condition that does not meet the
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier to: Office accession medical standards, they are
of the Secretary, Consumer Product invited on: Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary medically disqualified for military
Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330 entrance. This form also will be used by
East West Highway, Bethesda, MD for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including all service members not only in their
20814; telephone (301) 504–7923. initial medical examination but also for
Instructions: All submissions received whether the information shall have
practical utility; the accuracy of the periodic medical examinations.
must include the agency name and Affected Public: Individuals or
docket number for this notice. All agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection; ways households.
comments received may be posted Annual Burden Hours: 128,833 hours.
without change, including any personal to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be Number of Respondents: 773,000.
identifiers, contact information, or other Responses per Respondent: 1.
personal information provided, to: collected; and ways to minimize the
Annual Responses: 773,000.
http://www.regulations.gov. Do not burden of the information collection on
Average Burden per Response: 10
submit confidential business respondents, including through the use
minutes.
information, trade secret information, or of automated collection techniques or Frequency: On occasion.
other sensitive or protected information other forms of information technology. These forms obtain medical
electronically. Such information should DATES: Consideration will be given to all information which affects entrance
be submitted in writing. comments received by August 6, 2018. physical examinations, routine in-
Docket: For access to the docket to ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, service physical examinations,
read background documents or identified by docket number and title, separation physical examinations, and
comments received, go to: http:// by any of the following methods: other medical examinations as required.
www.regulations.gov and insert the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// The respondents are all applicants for
Docket No. CPSC–2018–0006 into the www.regulations.gov. Follow the enlistment, induction or
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts. instructions for submitting comments. commissioning, or service members.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Mail: Department of Defense, Office of The respondents complete the medical
On March 27, 2018, the Commission the Chief Management Officer, history information recorded on the
published an NOA in the Federal Directorate for Oversight and form. Medical professionals complete
Register, announcing the availability of Compliance, 4800 Mark Center Drive, the remaining sections, and the
a draft document titled, ‘‘Guidelines for Mailbox #24 Suite 08D09, Alexandria, information collected provides the
Determining Age Appropriateness of VA 22350–1700. Armed Services with the medical
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:19 Jun 04, 2018 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05JNN1.SGM 05JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_26146/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2018-11-02 11:47:13
Document Modified: 2018-11-02 11:47:13
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Extension of comment period. | |
| Dates | Submit comments by July 31, 2018. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 26038 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR