83_FR_26688 83 FR 26577 - Medical Devices; Orthopedic Devices; Classification of the In Vivo Cured Intramedullary Fixation Rod

83 FR 26577 - Medical Devices; Orthopedic Devices; Classification of the In Vivo Cured Intramedullary Fixation Rod

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 111 (June 8, 2018)

Page Range26577-26580
FR Document2018-12339

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is classifying the in vivo cured intramedullary fixation rod into class II (special controls). The special controls that apply to the device type are identified in this order and will be part of the codified language for the in vivo cured intramedullary fixation rod's classification. We are taking this action because we have determined that classifying the device into class II (special controls) will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of the device. We believe this action will also enhance patients' access to beneficial innovative devices, in part by reducing regulatory burdens.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 111 (Friday, June 8, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 111 (Friday, June 8, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 26577-26580]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12339]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 888

[Docket No. FDA-2018-N-1863]


Medical Devices; Orthopedic Devices; Classification of the In 
Vivo Cured Intramedullary Fixation Rod

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is classifying 
the in vivo cured intramedullary fixation rod into class II (special 
controls). The special controls that apply to the device type are 
identified in this order and will be part of the codified language for 
the in vivo cured intramedullary fixation rod's classification. We are 
taking this action because we have determined that classifying the 
device into class II (special controls) will provide a reasonable 
assurance of safety and effectiveness of the device. We believe this 
action will also enhance patients' access to beneficial innovative 
devices, in part by reducing regulatory burdens.

DATES: This order is effective June 8, 2018. The classification was 
applicable on December 19, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter Allen, Center for Devices and 
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire 
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 1512, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-6402, 
Peter.Allen@fda.hhs.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background

    Upon request, FDA has classified the in vivo cured intramedullary 
fixation rod as class II (special controls), which we have determined 
will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness. In 
addition, we believe this action will enhance patients' access to 
beneficial innovation, in part by

[[Page 26578]]

reducing regulatory burdens by placing the device into a lower device 
class than the automatic class III assignment.
    The automatic assignment of class III occurs by operation of law 
and without any action by FDA, regardless of the level of risk posed by 
the new device. Any device that was not in commercial distribution 
before May 28, 1976, is automatically classified as, and remains 
within, class III and requires premarket approval unless and until FDA 
takes an action to classify or reclassify the device (see 21 U.S.C. 
360c(f)(1)). We refer to these devices as ``postamendments devices'' 
because they were not in commercial distribution prior to the date of 
enactment of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976, which amended the 
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act).
    FDA may take a variety of actions in appropriate circumstances to 
classify or reclassify a device into class I or II. We may issue an 
order finding a new device to be substantially equivalent under section 
513(i) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device that 
does not require premarket approval. We determine whether a new device 
is substantially equivalent to a predicate by means of the procedures 
for premarket notification under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act (21 
U.S.C. 360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).
    FDA may also classify a device through ``De Novo'' classification, 
a common name for the process authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the 
FD&C Act. Section 207 of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization 
Act of 1997 established the first procedure for De Novo classification 
(Pub. L. 105-115). Section 607 of the Food and Drug Administration 
Safety and Innovation Act modified the De Novo application process by 
adding a second procedure (Pub. L. 112-144). A device sponsor may 
utilize either procedure for De Novo classification.
    Under the first procedure, the person submits a 510(k) for a device 
that has not previously been classified. After receiving an order from 
FDA classifying the device into class III under section 513(f)(1) of 
the FD&C Act, the person then requests a classification under section 
513(f)(2).
    Under the second procedure, rather than first submitting a 510(k) 
and then a request for classification, if the person determines that 
there is no legally marketed device upon which to base a determination 
of substantial equivalence, that person requests a classification under 
section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act.
    Under either procedure for De Novo classification, FDA shall 
classify the device by written order within 120 days. The 
classification will be according to the criteria under section 
513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act. Although the device was automatically placed 
within class III, the De Novo classification is considered to be the 
initial classification of the device.
    We believe this De Novo classification will enhance patients' 
access to beneficial innovation, in part by reducing regulatory 
burdens. When FDA classifies a device into class I or II via the De 
Novo process, the device can serve as a predicate for future devices of 
that type, including for 510(k)s (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(2)(B)(i)). As a 
result, other device sponsors do not have to submit a De Novo request 
or premarket approval application in order to market a substantially 
equivalent device (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(i), defining ``substantial 
equivalence''). Instead, sponsors can use the less burdensome 510(k) 
process, when necessary, to market their device.

II. De Novo Classification

    On December 28, 2016, IlluminOss Medical, Inc. submitted a request 
for De Novo classification of the IlluminOss Photodynamic Bone 
Stabilization System. FDA reviewed the request in order to classify the 
device under the criteria for classification set forth in section 
513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
    We classify devices into class II if general controls by themselves 
are insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and 
effectiveness, but there is sufficient information to establish special 
controls that, in combination with the general controls, provide 
reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device for 
its intended use (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the 
information submitted in the request, we determined that the device can 
be classified into class II with the establishment of special controls. 
FDA has determined that these special controls, in addition to the 
general controls, will provide reasonable assurance of the safety and 
effectiveness of the device.
    Therefore, on December 19, 2017, FDA issued an order to the 
requester classifying the device into class II. FDA is codifying the 
classification of the device by adding 21 CFR 888.3023. We have named 
the generic type of device in vivo cured intramedullary fixation rod, 
and it is identified as a prescription implanted device consisting of a 
balloon that is inserted into the medullary canal of long bones for the 
fixation of fractures. The balloon is infused with, and completely 
encapsulates, a liquid monomer that is exposed to a curing agent that 
polymerizes the monomer within the balloon creating a hardened rigid 
structure.
    FDA has identified the following risks to health associated 
specifically with this type of device and the measures required to 
mitigate these risks in table 1.

 Table 1--In Vivo Cured Intramedullary Fixation Rod Risks and Mitigation
                                Measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Identified risks                   Mitigation measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adverse tissue reaction resulting from:  Biocompatibility evaluation and
                                          Labeling.
     Balloon leakage...........
     Device materials..........
Infection, including wound               Sterilization validation,
 complications.                           Reprocessing validation, Shelf
                                          life testing, Pyrogenicity
                                          testing, and Labeling.
Bone fracture resulting from:..........  Non-clinical performance
                                          testing and Labeling.
     Device bending, cracking,
     or fracture.
     Device migration or
     instability, including initial
     inadequate fixation.
     Inability to properly
     deploy or remove device.
Soft tissue damage including             Non-clinical performance
 transection or laceration of neural,     testing and Labeling.
 vascular, or muscular structures.
Pain and/or loss of function resulting   Non-clinical performance
 from:.                                   testing and Labeling.
     Balloon leakage...........
     Device bending, cracking,
     or fracture.

[[Page 26579]]

 
     Device migration or
     instability, including initial
     inadequate fixation.
     Inability to properly
     deploy or remove device.
Revision...............................  Non-clinical performance
                                          testing and Labeling.
Electric shock or interference with      Electrical safety testing,
 other electrical devices.                Electromagnetic compatibility
                                          testing, and Labeling.
Exothermic reaction leading to tissue    Non-clinical performance
 injury.                                  testing.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FDA has determined that special controls, in combination with the 
general controls, address these risks to health and provide reasonable 
assurance of safety and effectiveness. For a device to fall within this 
classification, and thus avoid automatic classification in class III, 
it would have to comply with the special controls named in this final 
order. The necessary special controls appear in the regulation codified 
by this order. This device is subject to premarket notification 
requirements under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act.
    At the time of classification, in vivo cured intramedullary 
fixation rods are for prescription use only. Prescription devices are 
exempt from the requirement for adequate directions for use for the 
layperson under section 502(f)(1) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 352(f)(1)) 
and 21 CFR 801.5, as long as the conditions of 21 CFR 801.109 are met 
(referring to 21 U.S.C. 352(f)(1)).

III. Analysis of Environmental Impact

    The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is 
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental 
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.

IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    This final order establishes special controls that refer to 
previously approved collections of information found in other FDA 
regulations and guidance. These collections of information are subject 
to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The collections 
of information in the guidance document ``De Novo Classification 
Process (Evaluation of Automatic Class III Designation)'' have been 
approved under OMB control number 0910-0844; the collections of 
information in 21 CFR part 814, subparts A through E, regarding 
premarket approval, have been approved under OMB control number 0910-
0231; the collections of information in part 807, subpart E, regarding 
premarket notification submissions, have been approved under OMB 
control number 0910-0120; and the collections of information in 21 CFR 
part 801, regarding labeling, have been approved under OMB control 
number 0910-0485.

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 888

    Medical devices.

    Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under 
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 
888 is amended as follows:

PART 888--ORTHOPEDIC DEVICES

0
1. The authority citation for part 888 is revised to read as follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 360l, 371.

0
2. Add Sec.  888.3023 to subpart D to read as follows:


Sec.  888.3023  In vivo cured intramedullary fixation rod.

    (a) Identification. An in vivo cured intramedullary fixation rod is 
a prescription implanted device consisting of a balloon that is 
inserted into the medullary canal of long bones for the fixation of 
fractures. The balloon is infused with, and completely encapsulates, a 
liquid monomer that is exposed to a curing agent which polymerizes the 
monomer within the balloon creating a hardened rigid structure.
    (b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special 
controls for this device are:
    (1) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the 
device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The 
following performance characteristics must be tested:
    (i) Mechanical testing must be conducted on the final device to 
assess burst, abrasion, bending, and torsion in static and dynamic 
conditions.
    (ii) Mechanical testing must demonstrate the integrity of the 
balloon including testing for leaks, ruptures, and release of cured/
uncured material.
    (iii) Performance testing must demonstrate that the device can be 
inserted and removed.
    (iv) Performance testing must demonstrate the ability, in the event 
of a leak, to remove the uncured material from its in vivo location.
    (v) Performance testing must demonstrate the reliability and 
accuracy of the curing method used.
    (vi) Thermal safety testing must be conducted to evaluate the 
temperature rise during curing.
    (2) Electrical safety, electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) testing, 
and electromagnetic interference (EMI) testing must be conducted for 
all electrical components.
    (3) All patient-contacting components must be demonstrated to be 
biocompatible.
    (4) Performance data must demonstrate the sterility and 
pyrogenicity of patient contacting components of the device that are 
provided sterile.
    (5) Performance data must validate the reprocessing instructions 
for any reusable components or instruments.
    (6) Performance data must support the shelf life of the system by 
demonstrating continued sterility, package integrity, and system 
functionality over the established shelf life.
    (7) Technological characterization of the device must include 
materials, curing agents, and a description of the operating principles 
of the device, including the delivery system and devices which initiate 
the curing process.
    (8) Labeling must include the following:
    (i) A detailed summary of the device technical parameters.
    (ii) Information describing all materials of the device.
    (iii) Information describing how to perform the procedure and use 
the device, including the delivery system and devices which initiate 
the curing process, as well as how to remove the device and any uncured 
materials.
    (iv) A shelf life.
    (v) Validated methods and instructions for reprocessing any 
reusable components or instruments.


[[Page 26580]]


    Dated: June 4, 2018.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-12339 Filed 6-7-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P



                                                                 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 111 / Friday, June 8, 2018 / Rules and Regulations                                               26577

                                           order. The necessary special controls                   puncture and injure skin tissue for                       (i) Information on how the device
                                           appear in the regulation codified by this               aesthetic use. This classification does                operates and the typical course of
                                           order. This device is subject to                        not include devices intended for                       treatment;
                                           premarket notification requirements                     transdermal delivery of topical products                  (ii) The probable risks and benefits
                                           under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act.                   such as cosmetics, drugs, or biologics.                associated with use of the device; and
                                                                                                      (b) Classification. Class II (special                  (iii) Postoperative care instructions.
                                           III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
                                                                                                   controls). The special controls for this                 Dated: June 4, 2018.
                                              The Agency has determined under 21                   device are:                                            Leslie Kux,
                                           CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a type                 (1) The technical specifications and                Associate Commissioner for Policy.
                                           that does not individually or                           needle characteristics must be
                                           cumulatively have a significant effect on                                                                      [FR Doc. 2018–12335 Filed 6–7–18; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                   identified, including needle length,
                                           the human environment. Therefore,                       geometry, maximum penetration depth,                   BILLING CODE 4164–01–P

                                           neither an environmental assessment                     and puncture rate.
                                           nor an environmental impact statement                      (2) Non-clinical performance data
                                           is required.                                                                                                   DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
                                                                                                   must demonstrate that the device                       HUMAN SERVICES
                                           IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995                     performs as intended under anticipated
                                                                                                   conditions of use. The following                       Food and Drug Administration
                                             This final order establishes special                  performance characteristics must be
                                           controls that refer to previously                       tested:
                                           approved collections of information                                                                            21 CFR Part 888
                                                                                                      (i) Accuracy of needle penetration
                                           found in other FDA regulations and                      depth and puncture rate;                               [Docket No. FDA–2018–N–1863]
                                           guidance. These collections of                             (ii) Safety features built into the
                                           information are subject to review by the                                                                       Medical Devices; Orthopedic Devices;
                                                                                                   device to protect against cross-                       Classification of the In Vivo Cured
                                           Office of Management and Budget                         contamination, including fluid ingress
                                           (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction                                                                            Intramedullary Fixation Rod
                                                                                                   protection; and
                                           Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The                     (iii) Identification of the maximum                 AGENCY:   Food and Drug Administration,
                                           collections of information in the                       safe needle penetration depth for the                  HHS.
                                           guidance document ‘‘De Novo                             device for the labeled indications for
                                           Classification Process (Evaluation of                                                                          ACTION:   Final order.
                                                                                                   use.
                                           Automatic Class III Designation)’’ have                                                                        SUMMARY:    The Food and Drug
                                                                                                      (3) Performance data must
                                           been approved under OMB control                                                                                Administration (FDA or we) is
                                                                                                   demonstrate the sterility of the patient-
                                           number 0910–0844; the collections of                                                                           classifying the in vivo cured
                                                                                                   contacting components of the device.
                                           information in 21 CFR part 814,                                                                                intramedullary fixation rod into class II
                                                                                                      (4) Performance data must support the
                                           subparts A through E, regarding                                                                                (special controls). The special controls
                                                                                                   shelf life of the device by demonstrating
                                           premarket approval, have been                                                                                  that apply to the device type are
                                                                                                   continued sterility, package integrity,
                                           approved under OMB control number                                                                              identified in this order and will be part
                                                                                                   and device functionality over the
                                           0910–0231; the collections of                                                                                  of the codified language for the in vivo
                                                                                                   intended shelf life.
                                           information in part 807, subpart E,                                                                            cured intramedullary fixation rod’s
                                                                                                      (5) Performance data must
                                           regarding premarket notification                                                                               classification. We are taking this action
                                                                                                   demonstrate the electrical safety and
                                           submissions, have been approved under                                                                          because we have determined that
                                                                                                   electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) of
                                           OMB control number 0910–0120; and                                                                              classifying the device into class II
                                                                                                   all electrical components of the device.
                                           the collections of information in 21 CFR                                                                       (special controls) will provide a
                                                                                                      (6) Software verification, validation,
                                           part 801, regarding labeling, have been                                                                        reasonable assurance of safety and
                                                                                                   and hazard analysis must be performed
                                           approved under OMB control number                                                                              effectiveness of the device. We believe
                                                                                                   for all software components of the
                                           0910–0485.                                                                                                     this action will also enhance patients’
                                                                                                   device.
                                           List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 878                        (7) The patient-contacting                          access to beneficial innovative devices,
                                                                                                   components of the device must be                       in part by reducing regulatory burdens.
                                             Medical devices.
                                                                                                   demonstrated to be biocompatible.                      DATES: This order is effective June 8,
                                             Therefore, under the Federal Food,
                                                                                                      (8) Performance data must validate                  2018. The classification was applicable
                                           Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
                                                                                                   the cleaning and disinfection                          on December 19, 2017.
                                           authority delegated to the Commissioner
                                           of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 878 is                   instructions for reusable components of                FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                           amended as follows:                                     the device.                                            Peter Allen, Center for Devices and
                                                                                                      (9) Labeling must include the                       Radiological Health, Food and Drug
                                           PART 878—GENERAL AND PLASTIC                            following:                                             Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
                                           SURGERY DEVICES                                            (i) Information on how to operate the               Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 1512, Silver Spring,
                                                                                                   device and its components and the                      MD 20993–0002, 301–796–6402,
                                           ■ 1. The authority citation for part 878                typical course of treatment;                           Peter.Allen@fda.hhs.gov.
                                           continues to read as follows:                              (ii) A summary of the device technical              SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                             Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,            parameters, including needle length,
                                           360j, 360l, 371.                                        needle geometry, maximum penetration                   I. Background
                                           ■ 2. Add § 878.4430 to subpart E to read                depth, and puncture rate;                                 Upon request, FDA has classified the
                                                                                                      (iii) Validated methods and                         in vivo cured intramedullary fixation
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES




                                           as follows:
                                                                                                   instructions for reprocessing of any                   rod as class II (special controls), which
                                           § 878.4430 Microneedling device for                     reusable components;                                   we have determined will provide a
                                           aesthetic use.                                             (iv) Disposal instructions; and                     reasonable assurance of safety and
                                             (a) Identification. A microneedling                      (v) A shelf life.                                   effectiveness. In addition, we believe
                                           device for aesthetic use is a device using                 (10) Patient labeling must be provided              this action will enhance patients’ access
                                           one or more needles to mechanically                     and must include:                                      to beneficial innovation, in part by


                                      VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:08 Jun 07, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00031   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM   08JNR1


                                           26578                      Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 111 / Friday, June 8, 2018 / Rules and Regulations

                                           reducing regulatory burdens by placing                             may utilize either procedure for De                         Novo classification of the IlluminOss
                                           the device into a lower device class than                          Novo classification.                                        Photodynamic Bone Stabilization
                                           the automatic class III assignment.                                   Under the first procedure, the person                    System. FDA reviewed the request in
                                             The automatic assignment of class III                            submits a 510(k) for a device that has                      order to classify the device under the
                                                                                                              not previously been classified. After                       criteria for classification set forth in
                                           occurs by operation of law and without
                                                                                                              receiving an order from FDA classifying                     section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
                                           any action by FDA, regardless of the
                                                                                                              the device into class III under section
                                           level of risk posed by the new device.                                                                                            We classify devices into class II if
                                                                                                              513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, the person
                                           Any device that was not in commercial                                                                                          general controls by themselves are
                                                                                                              then requests a classification under
                                           distribution before May 28, 1976, is                                                                                           insufficient to provide reasonable
                                                                                                              section 513(f)(2).
                                           automatically classified as, and remains                              Under the second procedure, rather                       assurance of safety and effectiveness,
                                           within, class III and requires premarket                           than first submitting a 510(k) and then                     but there is sufficient information to
                                           approval unless and until FDA takes an                             a request for classification, if the person                 establish special controls that, in
                                           action to classify or reclassify the device                        determines that there is no legally                         combination with the general controls,
                                           (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)). We refer to                            marketed device upon which to base a                        provide reasonable assurance of the
                                           these devices as ‘‘postamendments                                  determination of substantial                                safety and effectiveness of the device for
                                           devices’’ because they were not in                                 equivalence, that person requests a                         its intended use (see 21 U.S.C.
                                           commercial distribution prior to the                               classification under section 513(f)(2) of                   360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the
                                           date of enactment of the Medical Device                            the FD&C Act.                                               information submitted in the request,
                                           Amendments of 1976, which amended                                     Under either procedure for De Novo                       we determined that the device can be
                                           the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic                               classification, FDA shall classify the                      classified into class II with the
                                           Act (FD&C Act).                                                    device by written order within 120 days.                    establishment of special controls. FDA
                                             FDA may take a variety of actions in                             The classification will be according to                     has determined that these special
                                           appropriate circumstances to classify or                           the criteria under section 513(a)(1) of                     controls, in addition to the general
                                           reclassify a device into class I or II. We                         the FD&C Act. Although the device was                       controls, will provide reasonable
                                           may issue an order finding a new device                            automatically placed within class III,                      assurance of the safety and effectiveness
                                           to be substantially equivalent under                               the De Novo classification is considered                    of the device.
                                           section 513(i) of the FD&C Act (21                                 to be the initial classification of the                        Therefore, on December 19, 2017,
                                           U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device that                         device.                                                     FDA issued an order to the requester
                                           does not require premarket approval.                                  We believe this De Novo classification                   classifying the device into class II. FDA
                                           We determine whether a new device is                               will enhance patients’ access to                            is codifying the classification of the
                                           substantially equivalent to a predicate                            beneficial innovation, in part by                           device by adding 21 CFR 888.3023. We
                                           by means of the procedures for                                     reducing regulatory burdens. When FDA                       have named the generic type of device
                                           premarket notification under section                               classifies a device into class I or II via                  in vivo cured intramedullary fixation
                                           510(k) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.                                  the De Novo process, the device can                         rod, and it is identified as a prescription
                                           360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).                            serve as a predicate for future devices of                  implanted device consisting of a balloon
                                                                                                              that type, including for 510(k)s (see 21                    that is inserted into the medullary canal
                                             FDA may also classify a device                                   U.S.C. 360c(f)(2)(B)(i)). As a result, other
                                           through ‘‘De Novo’’ classification, a                                                                                          of long bones for the fixation of
                                                                                                              device sponsors do not have to submit
                                           common name for the process                                                                                                    fractures. The balloon is infused with,
                                                                                                              a De Novo request or premarket
                                           authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the                                                                                      and completely encapsulates, a liquid
                                                                                                              approval application in order to market
                                           FD&C Act. Section 207 of the Food and                                                                                          monomer that is exposed to a curing
                                                                                                              a substantially equivalent device (see 21
                                           Drug Administration Modernization Act                                                                                          agent that polymerizes the monomer
                                                                                                              U.S.C. 360c(i), defining ‘‘substantial
                                           of 1997 established the first procedure                                                                                        within the balloon creating a hardened
                                                                                                              equivalence’’). Instead, sponsors can use
                                           for De Novo classification (Pub. L. 105–                                                                                       rigid structure.
                                                                                                              the less burdensome 510(k) process,
                                           115). Section 607 of the Food and Drug                             when necessary, to market their device.                        FDA has identified the following risks
                                           Administration Safety and Innovation                                                                                           to health associated specifically with
                                           Act modified the De Novo application                               II. De Novo Classification                                  this type of device and the measures
                                           process by adding a second procedure                                  On December 28, 2016, IlluminOss                         required to mitigate these risks in table
                                           (Pub. L. 112–144). A device sponsor                                Medical, Inc. submitted a request for De                    1.

                                                                 TABLE 1—IN VIVO CURED INTRAMEDULLARY FIXATION ROD RISKS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
                                                                                  Identified risks                                                                         Mitigation measures

                                           Adverse tissue reaction resulting from: ....................................................         Biocompatibility evaluation and Labeling.
                                                • Balloon leakage.
                                                • Device materials.
                                           Infection, including wound complications .................................................           Sterilization validation, Reprocessing validation, Shelf life testing,
                                                                                                                                                  Pyrogenicity testing, and Labeling.
                                           Bone fracture resulting from: ....................................................................   Non-clinical performance testing and Labeling.
                                               • Device bending, cracking, or fracture.
                                               • Device migration or instability, including initial inadequate fixa-
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES




                                                  tion.
                                               • Inability to properly deploy or remove device.
                                           Soft tissue damage including transection or laceration of neural, vas-                               Non-clinical performance testing and Labeling.
                                             cular, or muscular structures.
                                           Pain and/or loss of function resulting from: .............................................           Non-clinical performance testing and Labeling.
                                               • Balloon leakage.
                                               • Device bending, cracking, or fracture.



                                      VerDate Sep<11>2014      16:08 Jun 07, 2018      Jkt 244001     PO 00000      Frm 00032      Fmt 4700     Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM   08JNR1


                                                                         Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 111 / Friday, June 8, 2018 / Rules and Regulations                                                                26579

                                                        TABLE 1—IN VIVO CURED INTRAMEDULLARY FIXATION ROD RISKS AND MITIGATION MEASURES—Continued
                                                                                      Identified risks                                                                                Mitigation measures

                                               • Device migration or instability, including initial inadequate fixa-
                                                  tion.
                                               • Inability to properly deploy or remove device.
                                           Revision ....................................................................................................   Non-clinical performance testing and Labeling.
                                           Electric shock or interference with other electrical devices .....................                              Electrical safety testing, Electromagnetic compatibility testing, and La-
                                                                                                                                                             beling.
                                           Exothermic reaction leading to tissue injury ............................................                       Non-clinical performance testing.



                                             FDA has determined that special                                         information in part 807, subpart E,                                (iii) Performance testing must
                                           controls, in combination with the                                         regarding premarket notification                                demonstrate that the device can be
                                           general controls, address these risks to                                  submissions, have been approved under                           inserted and removed.
                                           health and provide reasonable assurance                                   OMB control number 0910–0120; and                                  (iv) Performance testing must
                                           of safety and effectiveness. For a device                                 the collections of information in 21 CFR                        demonstrate the ability, in the event of
                                           to fall within this classification, and                                   part 801, regarding labeling, have been                         a leak, to remove the uncured material
                                           thus avoid automatic classification in                                    approved under OMB control number                               from its in vivo location.
                                           class III, it would have to comply with                                   0910–0485.                                                         (v) Performance testing must
                                           the special controls named in this final                                                                                                  demonstrate the reliability and accuracy
                                                                                                                     List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 888                             of the curing method used.
                                           order. The necessary special controls
                                           appear in the regulation codified by this                                   Medical devices.                                                 (vi) Thermal safety testing must be
                                           order. This device is subject to                                            Therefore, under the Federal Food,                            conducted to evaluate the temperature
                                           premarket notification requirements                                       Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under                                rise during curing.
                                           under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act.                                     authority delegated to the Commissioner                            (2) Electrical safety, electromagnetic
                                             At the time of classification, in vivo                                  of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 888 is                           compatibility (EMC) testing, and
                                           cured intramedullary fixation rods are                                    amended as follows:                                             electromagnetic interference (EMI)
                                           for prescription use only. Prescription                                                                                                   testing must be conducted for all
                                           devices are exempt from the                                               PART 888—ORTHOPEDIC DEVICES                                     electrical components.
                                           requirement for adequate directions for                                                                                                      (3) All patient-contacting components
                                                                                                                     ■  1. The authority citation for part 888                       must be demonstrated to be
                                           use for the layperson under section                                       is revised to read as follows:
                                           502(f)(1) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.                                                                                                      biocompatible.
                                                                                                                       Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,                       (4) Performance data must
                                           352(f)(1)) and 21 CFR 801.5, as long as
                                                                                                                     360j, 360l, 371.                                                demonstrate the sterility and
                                           the conditions of 21 CFR 801.109 are
                                                                                                                     ■ 2. Add § 888.3023 to subpart D to read                        pyrogenicity of patient contacting
                                           met (referring to 21 U.S.C. 352(f)(1)).
                                                                                                                     as follows:                                                     components of the device that are
                                           III. Analysis of Environmental Impact                                                                                                     provided sterile.
                                                                                                                     § 888.3023 In vivo cured intramedullary                            (5) Performance data must validate
                                              The Agency has determined under 21                                     fixation rod.                                                   the reprocessing instructions for any
                                           CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a type                                   (a) Identification. An in vivo cured                         reusable components or instruments.
                                           that does not individually or                                             intramedullary fixation rod is a                                   (6) Performance data must support the
                                           cumulatively have a significant effect on                                 prescription implanted device                                   shelf life of the system by demonstrating
                                           the human environment. Therefore,                                         consisting of a balloon that is inserted                        continued sterility, package integrity,
                                           neither an environmental assessment                                       into the medullary canal of long bones                          and system functionality over the
                                           nor an environmental impact statement                                     for the fixation of fractures. The balloon                      established shelf life.
                                           is required.                                                              is infused with, and completely                                    (7) Technological characterization of
                                           IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995                                       encapsulates, a liquid monomer that is                          the device must include materials,
                                                                                                                     exposed to a curing agent which                                 curing agents, and a description of the
                                             This final order establishes special                                    polymerizes the monomer within the                              operating principles of the device,
                                           controls that refer to previously                                         balloon creating a hardened rigid                               including the delivery system and
                                           approved collections of information                                       structure.                                                      devices which initiate the curing
                                           found in other FDA regulations and                                           (b) Classification. Class II (special                        process.
                                           guidance. These collections of                                            controls). The special controls for this                           (8) Labeling must include the
                                           information are subject to review by the                                  device are:                                                     following:
                                           Office of Management and Budget                                              (1) Non-clinical performance testing                            (i) A detailed summary of the device
                                           (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction                                       must demonstrate that the device                                technical parameters.
                                           Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The                                    performs as intended under anticipated                             (ii) Information describing all
                                           collections of information in the                                         conditions of use. The following                                materials of the device.
                                           guidance document ‘‘De Novo                                               performance characteristics must be                                (iii) Information describing how to
                                           Classification Process (Evaluation of                                     tested:                                                         perform the procedure and use the
                                           Automatic Class III Designation)’’ have                                      (i) Mechanical testing must be                               device, including the delivery system
                                           been approved under OMB control                                           conducted on the final device to assess                         and devices which initiate the curing
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES




                                           number 0910–0844; the collections of                                      burst, abrasion, bending, and torsion in                        process, as well as how to remove the
                                           information in 21 CFR part 814,                                           static and dynamic conditions.                                  device and any uncured materials.
                                           subparts A through E, regarding                                              (ii) Mechanical testing must                                    (iv) A shelf life.
                                           premarket approval, have been                                             demonstrate the integrity of the balloon                           (v) Validated methods and
                                           approved under OMB control number                                         including testing for leaks, ruptures, and                      instructions for reprocessing any
                                           0910–0231; the collections of                                             release of cured/uncured material.                              reusable components or instruments.


                                      VerDate Sep<11>2014         16:08 Jun 07, 2018        Jkt 244001       PO 00000       Frm 00033        Fmt 4700      Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM   08JNR1


                                           26580                 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 111 / Friday, June 8, 2018 / Rules and Regulations

                                             Dated: June 4, 2018.                                     A notice of proposed rulemaking                     distributes appreciated property to its
                                           Leslie Kux,                                             (REG–149518–03) withdrawing                            shareholders to recognize gain
                                           Associate Commissioner for Policy.                      proposed regulations under section                     determined as if the property were sold
                                           [FR Doc. 2018–12339 Filed 6–7–18; 8:45 am]              337(d) published in 1992, and                          to the shareholders for its fair market
                                           BILLING CODE 4164–01–P                                  proposing new proposed regulations by                  value. Additionally, section 631 of the
                                                                                                   cross-reference to the temporary                       Act added section 337(d) to permit the
                                                                                                   regulations, was published in the                      Secretary to prescribe regulations that
                                           DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY                              Federal Register (80 FR 33451) on the                  are necessary or appropriate to carry out
                                                                                                   same date as TD 9722. Additionally, on                 the purposes of the General Utilities
                                           Internal Revenue Service                                June 12, 2015, the Treasury Department                 repeal, ‘‘including regulations to ensure
                                                                                                   and the IRS published proposed                         that [the repeal of the General Utilities
                                           26 CFR Part 1                                           regulations (REG–138759–14) under                      doctrine] may not be circumvented
                                                                                                   section 732(f) in the Federal Register                 through the use of any provision of law
                                           [TD 9833]                                                                                                      or regulations.’’
                                                                                                   (80 FR 33452) (together with the 2015
                                           RIN 1545–BO43                                           proposed regulations under section                        After the enactment of sections 311(b)
                                                                                                   337(d), the 2015 regulations).                         and 337(d), the Treasury Department
                                           Partnership Transactions Involving                         The Treasury Department and the IRS                 and the IRS became aware of
                                           Equity Interests of a Partner                           received one comment letter in response                transactions in which taxpayers used a
                                                                                                   to the 2015 regulations. Except as                     partnership to postpone or avoid
                                           AGENCY:  Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
                                                                                                   described below, the commenter largely                 completely gain generally required to be
                                           Treasury.
                                                                                                   supported the 2015 regulations while                   recognized under section 311(b). In one
                                           ACTION: Final rule.                                                                                            example of this transaction, a
                                                                                                   recommending some minor
                                           SUMMARY:    This document contains final                modifications and clarifications to the                corporation entered into a partnership
                                           regulations that prevent a corporate                    2015 regulations under both section                    and contributed appreciated property.
                                           partner from avoiding corporate-level                   337(d) and section 732(f). The comment                 The partnership then acquired stock of
                                           gain through transactions with a                        letter is discussed in detail in the                   that corporate partner, and later made a
                                           partnership involving equity interests of               Explanation of Provisions section of this              liquidating distribution of this stock to
                                           the partner or certain related entities.                preamble.                                              the corporate partner. Under section
                                           This document also contains final                          After considering this comment letter,              731(a), the corporate partner did not
                                           regulations that allow consolidated                     this Treasury decision adopts as final                 recognize gain on the partnership’s
                                           group members that are partners in the                  regulations the rules set forth in the                 distribution of its stock. By means of
                                           same partnership to aggregate their                     2015 regulations under section 337(d)                  this transaction, the corporation had
                                           bases in stock distributed by the                       (with only minor, nonsubstantive                       disposed of the appreciated property it
                                           partnership for the purpose of limiting                 clarifications in response to the                      formerly held and had acquired its own
                                           the application of rules that might                     commenter’s request for additional                     stock, permanently avoiding its gain in
                                           otherwise cause basis reduction or gain                 certainty regarding certain collateral                 the appreciated property. If the
                                           recognition. This document also                         effects) and section 732(f) (without any               corporation had directly exchanged the
                                           contains final regulations that may also                change). However, the Treasury                         appreciated property for its own stock,
                                           require certain corporations that engage                Department and the IRS are considering                 section 311(b) would have required the
                                           in gain elimination transactions to                     publishing a new notice of proposed                    corporation to recognize gain upon the
                                           reduce the basis of corporate assets or to              rulemaking to propose more substantive                 exchange.
                                           recognize gain. These final regulations                                                                           In response to these types of abusive
                                                                                                   amendments to the final regulations
                                           affect partnerships and their partners.                                                                        transactions, the Treasury Department
                                                                                                   under section 337(d) and to allow for
                                                                                                                                                          and the IRS issued Notice 89–37, 1989–
                                           DATES:                                                  additional public comment with respect
                                              Effective Date: These final regulations                                                                     1 CB 679, on March 9, 1989. Notice 89–
                                                                                                   to these more substantive proposals in
                                           are effective on June 8, 2018.                                                                                 37 announced that future regulations
                                                                                                   response to the comment letter, further
                                              Applicability Date: These final                                                                             under section 337(d) would address the
                                                                                                   reflection by the Treasury Department
                                           regulations are applicable on or after                                                                         use of partnerships to avoid the repeal
                                                                                                   and the IRS, and concerns raised by
                                           June 12, 2015.                                                                                                 of the General Utilities doctrine.
                                                                                                   practitioners.                                            On December 15, 1992, the Treasury
                                           FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                                                                   2. Regulations Under Section 337(d)                    Department and the IRS published a
                                           Concerning the final regulations, Kevin
                                                                                                                                                          notice of proposed rulemaking under
                                           I. Babitz, (202) 317–6852.                              A. Background                                          section 337(d) (PS–91–90, REG–208989–
                                           SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                                In General Utilities & Operating Co. v.              90, 1993–1 CB 919) in the Federal
                                           Background                                              Helvering, 296 U.S. 200 (1935), the                    Register (57 FR 59324) addressing
                                                                                                   Supreme Court held that corporations                   abusive partnership transactions
                                           1. Overview                                             generally could distribute appreciated                 involving stock of a corporate partner
                                              On June 12, 2015, the Department of                  property to their shareholders without                 (the 1992 proposed regulations). The
                                           the Treasury (and the IRS published                     the recognition of any corporate level                 1992 proposed regulations set forth a
                                           final and temporary regulations (TD                     gain (the General Utilities doctrine).                 deemed redemption rule and a separate
                                           9722) under section 337(d) of the                       Beginning with legislation in 1969 and                 distribution rule to prevent a corporate
                                           Internal Revenue Code (Code) in the                     culminating in the Tax Reform Act of                   partner from avoiding corporate-level
                                           Federal Register (80 FR 33402). On July                 1986, Public Law 99–514 (100 Stat.                     gain through transactions with a
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES




                                           8, 2015, corrections to TD 9722 were                    2085) (the Act), Congress repealed the                 partnership involving stock of the
                                           published in the Federal Register (80                   General Utilities doctrine by enacting                 corporate partner, stock of the partner’s
                                           FR 38940–38941) (together with TD                       section 336(a) to apply gain and loss                  affiliate, and other equity interests in
                                           9722, the temporary regulations). The                   recognition to liquidating distributions.              the corporate partner or affiliate. The
                                           temporary regulations expire on June                      Under current law, sections 311(b)                   1992 proposed regulations treated a
                                           11, 2018.                                               and 336(a) require a corporation that                  corporation as an affiliate of a partner at


                                      VerDate Sep<11>2014   16:08 Jun 07, 2018   Jkt 244001   PO 00000   Frm 00034   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM   08JNR1



Document Created: 2018-06-08 01:22:54
Document Modified: 2018-06-08 01:22:54
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionRules and Regulations
ActionFinal order.
DatesThis order is effective June 8, 2018. The classification was applicable on December 19, 2017.
ContactPeter Allen, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 1512, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-6402, [email protected]
FR Citation83 FR 26577 

2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR