83 FR 28785 - Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Red River, Shreveport, LA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 120 (June 21, 2018)

Page Range		28785-28787
FR Document		2018-13321
The Coast Guard proposes to change the operating schedule that governs the draws of the Union Pacific Railroad bridge, mile 227.0, and the Midsouth Railroad bridge, mile 228.2, across the Red River at Shreveport, LA. This proposed rule would allow the drawbridges to permanently remain in the closed-to-navigation position, no longer opening for vessel traffic. While there is vessel traffic on the waterway, no one has requested that either drawbridge open since 2007. Union Pacific Railroad and Midsouth Railroad, the bridge owners, requested to update the operating schedule accordingly.
Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 120 (Thursday, June 21, 2018)
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 120 (Thursday, June 21, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 28785-28787]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13321]


========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 120 / Thursday, June 21, 2018 / 
Proposed Rules

[[Page 28785]]



DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2017-0911]
RIN 1625-AA09


Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Red River, Shreveport, LA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to change the operating schedule that 
governs the draws of the Union Pacific Railroad bridge, mile 227.0, and 
the Midsouth Railroad bridge, mile 228.2, across the Red River at 
Shreveport, LA. This proposed rule would allow the drawbridges to 
permanently remain in the closed-to-navigation position, no longer 
opening for vessel traffic. While there is vessel traffic on the 
waterway, no one has requested that either drawbridge open since 2007. 
Union Pacific Railroad and Midsouth Railroad, the bridge owners, 
requested to update the operating schedule accordingly.

DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or 
before July 23, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2017-0911 using Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for 
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for 
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed 
rule, call or email Mr. Eric A. Washburn, Bridge Administrator, Western 
Rivers, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 314-269-2378, email 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose and Legal Basis

    The Coast Guard proposes to change the operating schedule that 
governs the draws of the Union Pacific Railroad bridge, mile 227.0, and 
the Midsouth Railroad bridge, mile 228.2, across the Red River at 
Shreveport, LA. The Red River extends approximately 294.0 miles from 
mile marker 304.0 on the Lower Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA, 
then through Twelve Mile and Cypress Bayous to its head of navigation 
near Daingerfield, TX. Regulations for the operation of drawbridges on 
the Red River are contained in 33 CFR 117.491. The Union Pacific 
Railroad bridge, mile 227.0, and the Midsouth Railroad bridge, mile 
228.2, are currently the only bridges governed by the regulations in 33 
CFR 117.491(c), which state that, ``the draws of the bridges above mile 
105.8 through mile 234.4 shall open on signal if at least 48 hours 
notice is given.''
    Navigation on the Red River in the vicinity of these bridges 
consists primarily of recreational craft, and commercial use of the 
waterway is only possible during periods of high water. Moreover, the 
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers does not maintain any project depth or 
navigable channel on this reach of the Red River, nor does the U.S. 
Coast Guard maintain any aids to navigation above mile 211.4. Under 33 
CFR 117.491(d), the bridges above mile 234.4 need not open for the 
passage of vessels. There are no alternate routes for vessels 
transiting this section of the Red River.
    Union Pacific Railroad owns the Union Pacific Railroad bridge, mile 
227.0, across the Red River at Shreveport, LA, and has requested that 
the drawbridge regulation be amended to allow the bridge to remain in 
the permanently closed position. Union Pacific provided the Coast Guard 
with bridge logs that indicate that there has been no request for a 
bridge opening since 2007. In the closed position, the Union Pacific 
Railroad bridge, mile 227.0, provides 15.1 feet of vertical clearance 
at mean high water.
    Midsouth Railroad owns the Midsouth Railroad bridge, mile 228.2, 
across the Red River at Shreveport, LA, and has also requested that the 
drawbridge remain in the permanently closed position. Midsouth Railroad 
provided the Coast Guard with bridge logs that indicate that there has 
been no request for a bridge opening since 2007. In the closed 
position, the Midsouth Railroad bridge, mile 228.2, provides 37.0 feet 
of vertical clearance at mean high water.
    Under 33 CFR 117.39, the District Commander may authorize a 
drawbridge to remain in the closed to navigation position and be 
untended when there have been no requests for drawbridge openings for 
two years. Due to the lack of significant navigation on this portion of 
the Red River that requires draws to open and the fact that there has 
been no request to open the draws in over ten years, the Coast Guard 
believes that this proposed rule is reasonable, and if implemented, 
should continue to meet the present and future needs of navigation. 
Based on the records provided by Union Pacific Railroad and Midsouth 
Railroad, it is expected that the proposed change will have no known 
impact to navigation or other waterway users. The Coast Guard proposes 
this rulemaking under authority of 33 U.S.C. 499.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The Coast Guard proposes to amend 33 CFR 117.491(c), which governs 
the operating schedule of the draws of the Union Pacific Railroad 
bridge, mile marker (MM) 227.0 and the Midsouth Railroad bridge, MM 
228.2, across the Red River at Shreveport, LA. The regulation currently 
requires the draws of the bridges above mile 105.8 through mile 234.4 
to open on signal if at least 48 hours' notice is given. This proposed 
rule would allow the bridges to remain closed to the passage of 
vessels. However, pursuant to 33 CFR 117.39, this rulemaking would 
include a provision that requires the owner or agency controlling the 
bridge to the draw to full operation within three months if the 
District Commander provides a notification that needs of navigation 
require resumed operation of the spans. The regulatory text and changes 
we are proposing appear at the end of this document.

[[Page 28786]]

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes 
and Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our 
analyses based on these statutes and Executive Orders and we discuss 
First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control 
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been 
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt 
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the fact that 
these drawbridges do not currently open for the passage of vessels due 
to the lack of navigation on the river. The last recorded opening of 
the drawbridges was in 2007. Consultation with the bridge owners 
indicated that currently no bridge tender positions are assigned to the 
bridges.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this 
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities. While some owners or operators of 
vessels intending to transit the bridge may be small entities, for the 
reasons stated in section IV.A. above, this proposed rule would not 
have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what 
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect 
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you 
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any 
policy or action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Government

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and 
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under 
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or 
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule will not 
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this 
proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland 
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction 
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made 
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of 
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves changing 
the operating schedule that governs the draws of two bridges on the Red 
River near Shreveport, LA to remain permanently closed to navigation. 
Normally such actions are categorically excluded from further review, 
under paragraph L49 of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 
023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A preliminary Record of Environmental 
Consideration is not required for this proposed rule. We seek any 
comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant 
environmental impact from this proposed rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking, 
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment 
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If 
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this 
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which 
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or 
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be 
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate 
instructions.

[[Page 28787]]

    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted 
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any 
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the 
docket, visit http://www.regulations.gov/privacynotice.
    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in this docket 
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's 
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up 
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a 
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117

    Bridges.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes 
to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:

PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland 
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. In Sec.  117.491, revise paragraph (c) to read as follows:


 Sec.  117.491   Red River.

* * * * *
    (c) The draws of the bridges above mile 105.8 through mile 234.4 
need not open for passage of vessels. The owner or agency controlling 
the bridge must restore the draw to full operation within three months 
if notified by the District Commander that the needs of navigation 
require resumed operation of the spans.
* * * * *

    Dated: June 12, 2018.
P.F. Thomas,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2018-13321 Filed 6-20-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
28785

Proposed Rules Federal Register
Vol. 83, No. 120

Thursday, June 21, 2018

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER I. Table of Abbreviations Midsouth Railroad owns the
contains notices to the public of the proposed Midsouth Railroad bridge, mile 228.2,
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
issuance of rules and regulations. The across the Red River at Shreveport, LA,
DHS Department of Homeland Security
purpose of these notices is to give interested and has also requested that the
FR Federal Register
persons an opportunity to participate in the
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking drawbridge remain in the permanently
rule making prior to the adoption of the final § Section closed position. Midsouth Railroad
rules. U.S.C. United States Code provided the Coast Guard with bridge
II. Background, Purpose and Legal logs that indicate that there has been no
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND Basis request for a bridge opening since 2007.
SECURITY In the closed position, the Midsouth
The Coast Guard proposes to change
Railroad bridge, mile 228.2, provides
Coast Guard the operating schedule that governs the
draws of the Union Pacific Railroad 37.0 feet of vertical clearance at mean
bridge, mile 227.0, and the Midsouth high water.
33 CFR Part 117 Under 33 CFR 117.39, the District
Railroad bridge, mile 228.2, across the
Red River at Shreveport, LA. The Red Commander may authorize a
[Docket No. USCG–2017–0911] River extends approximately 294.0 drawbridge to remain in the closed to
miles from mile marker 304.0 on the navigation position and be untended
RIN 1625–AA09 Lower Mississippi River to Shreveport, when there have been no requests for
LA, then through Twelve Mile and drawbridge openings for two years. Due
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Red Cypress Bayous to its head of navigation to the lack of significant navigation on
River, Shreveport, LA near Daingerfield, TX. Regulations for this portion of the Red River that
the operation of drawbridges on the Red requires draws to open and the fact that
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
River are contained in 33 CFR 117.491. there has been no request to open the
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. The Union Pacific Railroad bridge, mile draws in over ten years, the Coast Guard
227.0, and the Midsouth Railroad believes that this proposed rule is
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
bridge, mile 228.2, are currently the reasonable, and if implemented, should
change the operating schedule that
only bridges governed by the regulations continue to meet the present and future
governs the draws of the Union Pacific
in 33 CFR 117.491(c), which state that, needs of navigation. Based on the
Railroad bridge, mile 227.0, and the
‘‘the draws of the bridges above mile records provided by Union Pacific
Midsouth Railroad bridge, mile 228.2,
105.8 through mile 234.4 shall open on Railroad and Midsouth Railroad, it is
across the Red River at Shreveport, LA.
signal if at least 48 hours notice is expected that the proposed change will
This proposed rule would allow the
given.’’ have no known impact to navigation or
drawbridges to permanently remain in Navigation on the Red River in the
the closed-to-navigation position, no other waterway users. The Coast Guard
vicinity of these bridges consists proposes this rulemaking under
longer opening for vessel traffic. While primarily of recreational craft, and
there is vessel traffic on the waterway, authority of 33 U.S.C. 499.
commercial use of the waterway is only
no one has requested that either possible during periods of high water. III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
drawbridge open since 2007. Union Moreover, the U.S. Army Corps of
Pacific Railroad and Midsouth Railroad, Engineers does not maintain any project The Coast Guard proposes to amend
the bridge owners, requested to update depth or navigable channel on this 33 CFR 117.491(c), which governs the
the operating schedule accordingly. reach of the Red River, nor does the U.S. operating schedule of the draws of the
DATES: Comments and related material Coast Guard maintain any aids to Union Pacific Railroad bridge, mile
must reach the Coast Guard on or before navigation above mile 211.4. Under 33 marker (MM) 227.0 and the Midsouth
July 23, 2018. CFR 117.491(d), the bridges above mile Railroad bridge, MM 228.2, across the
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 234.4 need not open for the passage of Red River at Shreveport, LA. The
identified by docket number USCG– vessels. There are no alternate routes for regulation currently requires the draws
2017–0911 using Federal eRulemaking vessels transiting this section of the Red of the bridges above mile 105.8 through
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. River. mile 234.4 to open on signal if at least
See the ‘‘Public Participation and Union Pacific Railroad owns the 48 hours’ notice is given. This proposed
Request for Comments’’ portion of the Union Pacific Railroad bridge, mile rule would allow the bridges to remain
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 227.0, across the Red River at closed to the passage of vessels.
below for instructions on submitting Shreveport, LA, and has requested that However, pursuant to 33 CFR 117.39,
comments. the drawbridge regulation be amended this rulemaking would include a
to allow the bridge to remain in the provision that requires the owner or
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If permanently closed position. Union agency controlling the bridge to the
you have questions on this proposed Pacific provided the Coast Guard with draw to full operation within three
rule, call or email Mr. Eric A. bridge logs that indicate that there has months if the District Commander
Washburn, Bridge Administrator, been no request for a bridge opening provides a notification that needs of
Western Rivers, U.S. Coast Guard; since 2007. In the closed position, the navigation require resumed operation of
telephone 314–269–2378, email Union Pacific Railroad bridge, mile the spans. The regulatory text and
Eric.Washburn@uscg.mil. 227.0, provides 15.1 feet of vertical changes we are proposing appear at the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: clearance at mean high water. end of this document.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:10 Jun 20, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21JNP1.SGM 21JNP1
28786 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 120 / Thursday, June 21, 2018 / Proposed Rules

IV. Regulatory Analyses qualifies and how and to what degree proposed rule will not result in such an
We developed this proposed rule after this rule would economically affect it. expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
Under section 213(a) of the Small this proposed rule elsewhere in this
considering numerous statutes and
Business Regulatory Enforcement preamble.
Executive Orders related to rulemaking.
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
Below we summarize our analyses F. Environment
we want to assist small entities in
based on these statutes and Executive We have analyzed this proposed rule
understanding this proposed rule. If the
Orders and we discuss First under Department of Homeland
rule would affect your small business,
Amendment rights of protestors. Security Management Directive 023–01
organization, or governmental
A. Regulatory Planning and Review jurisdiction and you have questions and Commandant Instruction
concerning its provisions or options for M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 Guard in complying with the National
direct agencies to assess the costs and compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
benefits of available regulatory U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will
alternatives and, if regulation is preliminary determination that this
necessary, to select regulatory not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this action is one of a category of actions that
approaches that maximize net benefits. do not individually or cumulatively
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard. have a significant effect on the human
to control regulatory costs through a environment. This proposed rule
budgeting process. This NPRM has not C. Collection of Information involves changing the operating
been designated a ‘‘significant This proposed rule would call for no schedule that governs the draws of two
regulatory action,’’ under Executive new collection of information under the bridges on the Red River near
Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 Shreveport, LA to remain permanently
has not been reviewed by the Office of U.S.C. 3501–3520). closed to navigation. Normally such
Management and Budget (OMB) and actions are categorically excluded from
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
further review, under paragraph L49 of
from the requirements of Executive Government
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Order 13771. A rule has implications for federalism Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 01. A
This regulatory action determination under Executive Order 13132, preliminary Record of Environmental
is based on the fact that these Federalism, if it has a substantial direct Consideration is not required for this
drawbridges do not currently open for effect on the States, on the relationship proposed rule. We seek any comments
the passage of vessels due to the lack of between the national government and or information that may lead to the
navigation on the river. The last the States, or on the distribution of discovery of a significant environmental
recorded opening of the drawbridges power and responsibilities among the impact from this proposed rule.
was in 2007. Consultation with the various levels of government. We have
bridge owners indicated that currently analyzed this proposed rule under that G. Protest Activities
no bridge tender positions are assigned Order and have determined that it is The Coast Guard respects the First
to the bridges. consistent with the fundamental Amendment rights of protesters.
B. Impact on Small Entities federalism principles and preemption Protesters are asked to contact the
requirements described in Executive person listed in the FOR FURTHER
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 Order 13132. INFORMATION CONTACT section to
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, Also, this proposed rule does not have coordinate protest activities so that your
requires federal agencies to consider the tribal implications under Executive message can be received without
potential impact of regulations on small Order 13175, Consultation and jeopardizing the safety or security of
entities during rulemaking. The term Coordination with Indian Tribal people, places or vessels.
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small Governments, because it would not have
businesses, not-for-profit organizations a substantial direct effect on one or V. Public Participation and Request for
that are independently owned and more Indian tribes, on the relationship Comments
operated and are not dominant in their between the Federal Government and We view public participation as
fields, and governmental jurisdictions Indian tribes, or on the distribution of essential to effective rulemaking, and
with populations of less than 50,000. power and responsibilities between the will consider all comments and material
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. Federal Government and Indian tribes. received during the comment period.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not If you believe this proposed rule has Your comment can help shape the
have a significant economic impact on implications for federalism or Indian outcome of this rulemaking. If you
a substantial number of small entities. tribes, please contact the person listed submit a comment, please include the
While some owners or operators of in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION docket number for this rulemaking,
vessels intending to transit the bridge CONTACT section above. indicate the specific section of this
may be small entities, for the reasons document to which each comment
stated in section IV.A. above, this E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act applies, and provide a reason for each
proposed rule would not have a The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act suggestion or recommendation.
significant economic impact on any of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires We encourage you to submit
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1

vessel owner or operator. Federal agencies to assess the effects of comments through the Federal
If you think that your business, their discretionary regulatory actions. In eRulemaking Portal at http://
organization, or governmental particular, the Act addresses actions www.regulations.gov. If your material
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity that may result in the expenditure by a cannot be submitted using http://
and that this rule would have a State, local, or tribal government, in the www.regulations.gov, contact the person
significant economic impact on it, aggregate, or by the private sector of in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
please submit a comment (see $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or CONTACT section of this document for
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it more in any one year. Though this alternate instructions.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:10 Jun 20, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\21JNP1.SGM 21JNP1
Document Created: 2018-06-21 01:23:24
Document Modified: 2018-06-21 01:23:24
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Dates		Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or before July 23, 2018.
Contact		If you have questions on this proposed rule, call or email Mr. Eric A. Washburn, Bridge Administrator, Western Rivers, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 314-269-2378, email [email protected]
FR Citation		83 FR 28785
RIN Number		1625-AA09
83 FR 28785 - Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Red River, Shreveport, LA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 120 (June 21, 2018)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
