83 FR 30046 - Safety Zone; Boaters Against Cancer Fireworks Display; Lake Ontario, Kendall, NY

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 124 (June 27, 2018)

Page Range		30046-30048
FR Document		2018-13735

The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for navigable waters within a 210-foot radius of the launch site located at Bald Eagle Marina, Kendall, NY. This safety zone is intended to restrict vessels from portions of the Lake Ontario during Boaters Against Cancer fireworks display. This temporary safety zone is necessary to protect mariners and vessels from the navigational hazards associated with a fireworks display. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2018)

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30046-30048]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13735]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2018-0617]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Boaters Against Cancer Fireworks Display; Lake 
Ontario, Kendall, NY

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for 
navigable waters within a 210-foot radius of the launch site located at 
Bald Eagle Marina, Kendall, NY. This safety zone is intended to 
restrict vessels from portions of the Lake Ontario during Boaters 
Against Cancer fireworks display. This temporary safety zone is 
necessary to protect mariners and vessels from the navigational hazards 
associated with a fireworks display. Entry of vessels or persons into 
this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain 
of the Port Buffalo.

DATES: This rule is effective from 9:45 p.m. until 10:35 p.m. on June 
30, 2018.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2018-0617 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email LT Michael Collet, Chief Waterways Management Division, 
U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 716-843-9322, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice 
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of 
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
with respect to this rule because the event sponsor did not submit 
notice to the Coast Guard with sufficient time remaining before the 
event to publish an NPRM. Delaying the effective date would be contrary 
to the rule's objectives of ensuring safety of life on the navigable 
waters and protection of persons and vessels in vicinity of the 
fireworks display.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause 
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after 
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date would 
be contrary to the rule's objectives of ensuring safety of life on the 
navigable waters and protection of persons and vessels in vicinity of 
the fireworks display.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 
1231. The Captain of the Port Buffalo (COTP) has determined that a 
fireworks display presents significant risks to the public safety and 
property. Such hazards include premature and accidental detonations, 
dangerous projectiles, and falling or burning debris. This rule is 
needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in the 
navigable waters within the safety zone while the fireworks display 
takes place.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a safety zone on June 30, 2018, from 9:45 
p.m. until 10:35 p.m. The safety zone will encompass all waters of Lake 
Ontario; Kendall, NY contained within 210-foot radius of: 
43[deg]22'02.04'' N, 078[deg]01'48.06'' W.

[[Page 30047]]

    Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is 
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his 
designated on-scene representative. The Captain of the Port or his 
designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control 
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been 
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt 
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the conclusion 
that this rule is not a significant regulatory action. We anticipate 
that it will have minimal impact on the economy, will not interfere 
with other agencies, will not adversely alter the budget of any grant 
or loan recipients, and will not raise any novel legal or policy 
issues. The safety zone created by this rule will be relatively small 
and enforced for a relatively short time. Also, the safety zone has 
been designed to allow vessels to transit around it. Thus, restrictions 
on vessel movement within that particular area are expected to be 
minimal. Under certain conditions, moreover, vessels may still transit 
through the safety zone when permitted by the Captain of the Port.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any 
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, which guide the 
Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is 
one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively 
have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule 
establishes a temporary safety zone. It is categorically excluded from 
further review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS 
Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A Record of Environmental 
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket 
where indicated under ADDRESSES.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

[[Page 30048]]

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.


0
2. Add Sec.  165.T09-0617 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T09-0617   Safety Zone; Boaters Against Cancer Fireworks 
Display; Lake Ontario, Kendall, NY.

    (a) Location. The safety zone will encompass all waters of Lake 
Ontario; Kendall, NY contained within a 210-foot radius of: 
43[deg]22'02.04'' N, 078[deg]01'48.06'' W.
    (b) Enforcement period. This regulation will be enforced from 9:45 
p.m. until 10:35 p.m. on June 30, 2018.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in 
Sec.  165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within 
this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the 
Port Buffalo or his designated on-scene representative.
    (2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may 
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his designated on-
scene representative.
    (3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port 
Buffalo is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who 
has been designated by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act on his 
behalf.
    (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety 
zone must contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his on-scene 
representative to obtain permission to do so. The Captain of the Port 
Buffalo or his on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 
16. Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in the safety 
zone must comply with all directions given to them by the Captain of 
the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene representative.

    Dated: June 20, 2018.
Joseph S. Dufresne,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 2018-13735 Filed 6-26-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 27, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 30047

Entry into, transiting, or anchoring The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. tribes, on the relationship between the
within the safety zone is prohibited 605(b) that this rule will not have a Federal Government and Indian tribes,
unless authorized by the Captain of the significant economic impact on a or on the distribution of power and
Port Buffalo or his designated on-scene substantial number of small entities. responsibilities between the Federal
representative. The Captain of the Port While some owners or operators of Government and Indian tribes. If you
or his designated on-scene vessels intending to transit the safety believe this rule has implications for
representative may be contacted via zone may be small entities, for the federalism or Indian tribes, please
VHF Channel 16. reasons stated in section V.A above, this contact the person listed in the FOR
rule will not have a significant FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
V. Regulatory Analyses economic impact on any vessel owner above.
We developed this rule after or operator.
considering numerous statutes and Under section 213(a) of the Small E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Business Regulatory Enforcement The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Below we summarize our analyses Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
based on a number of these statutes and we want to assist small entities in Federal agencies to assess the effects of
Executive orders, and we discuss First understanding this rule. If the rule their discretionary regulatory actions. In
Amendment rights of protestors. would affect your small business, particular, the Act addresses actions
A. Regulatory Planning and Review organization, or governmental that may result in the expenditure by a
jurisdiction and you have questions State, local, or tribal government, in the
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 concerning its provisions or options for aggregate, or by the private sector of
direct agencies to assess the costs and compliance, please contact the person $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
benefits of available regulatory listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION more in any one year. Though this rule
alternatives and, if regulation is CONTACT section. will not result in such an expenditure,
necessary, to select regulatory Small businesses may send comments we do discuss the effects of this rule
approaches that maximize net benefits. on the actions of Federal employees elsewhere in this preamble.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies who enforce, or otherwise determine
to control regulatory costs through a compliance with, Federal regulations to F. Environment
budgeting process. This rule has not the Small Business and Agriculture We have analyzed this rule under
been designated a ‘‘significant Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman Department of Homeland Security
regulatory action,’’ under Executive and the Regional Small Business Directive 023–01 and Commandant
Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Instruction M16475.1D, which guide the
not been reviewed by the Office of Ombudsman evaluates these actions Coast Guard in complying with the
Management and Budget (OMB), and annually and rates each agency’s National Environmental Policy Act of
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt responsiveness to small business. If you 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
from the requirements of Executive wish to comment on actions by determined that this action is one of a
Order 13771. employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
This regulatory action determination category of actions that do not
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The individually or cumulatively have a
is based on the conclusion that this rule Coast Guard will not retaliate against
is not a significant regulatory action. We significant effect on the human
small entities that question or complain environment. This rule establishes a
anticipate that it will have minimal about this rule or any policy or action
impact on the economy, will not temporary safety zone. It is categorically
of the Coast Guard. excluded from further review under
interfere with other agencies, will not
adversely alter the budget of any grant C. Collection of Information paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table
or loan recipients, and will not raise any 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01–
This rule will not call for a new
novel legal or policy issues. The safety 001–01, Rev. 01. A Record of
collection of information under the
zone created by this rule will be Environmental Consideration
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
relatively small and enforced for a supporting this determination is
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
relatively short time. Also, the safety available in the docket where indicated
zone has been designed to allow vessels D. Federalism and Indian Tribal under ADDRESSES.
to transit around it. Thus, restrictions on Governments
G. Protest Activities
vessel movement within that particular A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132, The Coast Guard respects the First
area are expected to be minimal. Under
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct Amendment rights of protesters.
certain conditions, moreover, vessels
effect on the States, on the relationship Protesters are asked to contact the
may still transit through the safety zone
between the national government and person listed in the FOR FURTHER
when permitted by the Captain of the
the States, or on the distribution of INFORMATION CONTACT section to
Port.
power and responsibilities among the coordinate protest activities so that your
B. Impact on Small Entities various levels of government. We have message can be received without
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of analyzed this rule under that Order and jeopardizing the safety or security of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, have determined that it is consistent people, places or vessels.
requires Federal agencies to consider with the fundamental federalism List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
the potential impact of regulations on principles and preemption requirements
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
nshattuck on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES

small entities during rulemaking. The described in Executive Order 13132.
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small Also, this rule does not have tribal (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
businesses, not-for-profit organizations implications under Executive Order requirements, Security measures,
that are independently owned and 13175, Consultation and Coordination Waterways.
operated and are not dominant in their with Indian Tribal Governments, For the reasons discussed in the
fields, and governmental jurisdictions because it does not have a substantial preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
with populations of less than 50,000. direct effect on one or more Indian CFR part 165 as follows:

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:30 Jun 26, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\27JNR1.SGM 27JNR1

30048 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 27, 2018 / Rules and Regulations

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION adequate provisions to prohibit
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS AGENCY emissions that will contribute
significantly to nonattainment or
■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 40 CFR Part 52 interfere with maintenance of the 2012
continues to read as follows: [EPA–R10–OAR–2017–0745; FRL–9980–00– PM2.5 NAAQS in any other state (83 FR
Region 10] 19191). An explanation of the Clean Air
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; Act requirements, a detailed analysis of
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; the submission, and the EPA’s reasons
Air Plan Approval; Alaska; Interstate
Department of Homeland Security Delegation for proposing approval were provided in
Transport Requirements for the 2012
No. 0170.1. the notice of proposed rulemaking, and
PM2.5 NAAQS
■ 2. Add § 165.T09–0617 to read as will not be restated here. The public
AGENCY: Environmental Protection comment period for the proposal ended
follows: Agency (EPA). June 1, 2018. We received no adverse
§ 165.T09–0617 Safety Zone; Boaters ACTION: Final rule. comments.1
Against Cancer Fireworks Display; Lake
Ontario, Kendall, NY. SUMMARY: The Clean Air Act requires II. Final Action
each State Implementation Plan (SIP) to The EPA is approving Alaska’s March
(a) Location. The safety zone will contain adequate provisions prohibiting 10, 2016, submission certifying that the
encompass all waters of Lake Ontario; emissions that will have certain adverse current Alaska SIP is sufficient to meet
Kendall, NY contained within a 210-foot air quality effects in other states. On the interstate transport requirements of
radius of: 43°22′02.04″ N, 078°01′48.06″ March 10, 2016, the State of Alaska Clean Air Act section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)
W. made a submission to the for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS, as described
(b) Enforcement period. This Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the proposal for this action.
regulation will be enforced from 9:45 to address these requirements. The EPA
is approving the submission as meeting III. Statutory and Executive Order
p.m. until 10:35 p.m. on June 30, 2018. Reviews
the requirement that each SIP contain
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with adequate provisions to prohibit Under the Clean Air Act, the
the general regulations in § 165.23 of emissions that will contribute Administrator is required to approve a
this part, entry into, transiting, or significantly to nonattainment or SIP submission that complies with the
anchoring within this safety zone is interfere with maintenance of the 2012 provisions of the Clean Air Act and
prohibited unless authorized by the annual fine particulate matter (PM2.5) applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C.
Captain of the Port Buffalo or his National Ambient Air Quality Standard 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
designated on-scene representative. (NAAQS). reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA’s
(2) This safety zone is closed to all DATES: This final rule is effective July role is to approve state choices,
vessel traffic, except as may be 27, 2018. provided that they meet the criteria of
permitted by the Captain of the Port ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this
Buffalo or his designated on-scene docket for this action under Docket ID action merely approves state law as
representative. No. EPA–R10–OAR–2017–0745. All meeting federal requirements and does
documents in the docket are listed on not impose additional requirements
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of beyond those imposed by state law. For
the Captain of the Port Buffalo is any the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index, that reason, this action:
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or • Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
some information is not publicly
petty officer who has been designated action’’ subject to review by the Office
available, e.g., CBI or other information
by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act whose disclosure is restricted by statute. of Management and Budget under
on his behalf. Certain other material, such as Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter copyrighted material, is not placed on October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
or operate within the safety zone must the internet and will be publicly January 21, 2011);
contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo available only in hard copy form. • is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
or his on-scene representative to obtain Publicly available docket materials are FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
permission to do so. The Captain of the available through https:// action because actions such as SIP
Port Buffalo or his on-scene www.regulations.gov, or please contact approvals are exempted under
the person identified in the ‘‘For Further Executive Order 12866;
representative may be contacted via
Information Contact’’ section for • does not impose an information
VHF Channel 16. Vessel operators given
additional availability information. collection burden under the provisions
permission to enter or operate in the of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
safety zone must comply with all FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
directions given to them by the Captain Hunt at (206) 553–0256, or hunt.jeff@ • is certified as not having a
of the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene epa.gov. significant economic impact on a
representative. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: substantial number of small entities
Dated: June 20, 2018. under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
Table of Contents
Joseph S. Dufresne, U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
I. Background Information
nshattuck on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the II. Final Action 1 We received two comments in support of our
Port Buffalo. III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews proposed approval. The first was submitted by the
[FR Doc. 2018–13735 Filed 6–26–18; 8:45 am] Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation.
I. Background Information The second was submitted anonymously. The
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
anonymous commenter suggested additional areas
On May 2, 2018, the EPA proposed to for EPA research, primarily regarding PM2.5 impacts
approve Alaska’s submission as meeting on environmental justice communities, but was
the requirement that each SIP contain overall supportive of our proposed approval.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:30 Jun 26, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\27JNR1.SGM 27JNR1

Document Created: 2018-11-06 09:53:04
Document Modified: 2018-11-06 09:53:04

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective from 9:45 p.m. until 10:35 p.m. on June 30, 2018.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email LT Michael Collet, Chief Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 716-843-9322, email D09-SMB-SECBuffalo- [email protected]
FR Citation		83 FR 30046
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (Water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

83 FR 30046 - Safety Zone; Boaters Against Cancer Fireworks Display; Lake Ontario, Kendall, NY

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 124 (June 27, 2018)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard