83 FR 30147 - Manual for Courts-Martial; Proposed Amendments

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 124 (June 27, 2018)

Page Range		30147-30149
FR Document		2018-13783

The Department of Defense requests comments on proposed changes to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2016 ed.) (MCM). The proposed changes concern the rules of procedure and evidence applicable in trials by courts-martial as well as amendments to portions of the MCM discussing the punitive articles of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The approval authority for these changes is the President. These proposed changes have not been coordinated within the Department of Defense under DoD Directive 5500.01, ``Preparing, Processing and Coordinating Legislation, Executive Orders, Proclamations, Views Letters, and Testimony,'' June 15, 2007, and do not constitute the official position of the Department of Defense, the Military Departments, or any other Government agency.

Federal Register, Volume 83 Issue 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2018)

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30147-30149]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13783]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID DOD-2018-OS-0039]


Manual for Courts-Martial; Proposed Amendments

AGENCY: Joint Service Committee on Military Justice (JSC), Department 
of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of proposed amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial, 
United States (2016 ed.) and notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense requests comments on proposed 
changes to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2016 ed.) 
(MCM). The proposed changes concern the rules of procedure and evidence 
applicable in trials by courts-martial as well as amendments to 
portions of the MCM discussing the punitive articles of the Uniform 
Code of Military Justice. The approval authority for these changes is 
the President. These proposed changes have not been coordinated within 
the Department of Defense under DoD Directive 5500.01, ``Preparing, 
Processing and Coordinating Legislation, Executive Orders, 
Proclamations, Views Letters, and Testimony,'' June 15, 2007, and do 
not constitute the official position of the Department of Defense, the 
Military Departments, or any other Government agency.

DATES: Comments on the proposed changes must be received no later than 
August 27, 2018. A public meeting for comments will be held on July 11, 
2018, at 1:30 p.m. in the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed 
Forces building, 450 E Street NW, Washington DC 20442-0001.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Department of Defense, Office of the Deputy Chief 
Management Officer, Directorate for Oversight and Compliance, 4800 Mark 
Center Drive, Mailbox #24, Suite 08D09, Alexandria, VA 22350-1700.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general 
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is 
to make these submissions available for public viewing on the internet 
at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, 
including any personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Alexandra Nica, JAGC, USN, 
Executive Secretary, JSC, (202) 685-7058, [email protected]. The 
JSC website is located at http://jsc.defense.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is provided in accordance with

[[Page 30148]]

DoD Instruction 5500.17, ``Role and Responsibilities of the Joint 
Service Committee (JSC) on Military Justice,'' February 21, 2018.
    The JSC invites members of the public to comment on the proposed 
changes; such comments should address specific recommended changes and 
provide supporting rationale.
    This notice also sets forth the date, time, and location for a 
public meeting of the JSC to discuss the proposed changes.
    This notice is intended only to improve the internal management of 
the Federal Government. It is not intended to create any right or 
benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by any party 
against the United States, its agencies, its officers, or any person.
    The proposed amendments to the MCM are as follows:

    Section 1. Part II of the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States 
as amended by E.O. 13825 is further amended as follows:
    (a) R.C.M. 705(d)(1) is amended and reads as follows:
    ``(1) In general. Subject to such limitations as the Secretary 
concerned may prescribe pursuant to R.C.M. 705(a), a plea agreement 
that limits the sentence that can be imposed by the court-martial for 
one or more charges and specifications may contain:
    (A) A limitation on the maximum punishment that can be imposed by 
the court-martial;
    (B) a limitation on the minimum punishment that can be imposed by 
the court-martial;
    (C) limitations on the maximum and minimum punishments that can be 
imposed by the court-martial; or,
    (D) a specified sentence or portion of a sentence that shall be 
imposed by the court-martial.''
    (b) R.C.M. 916(e) is amended and reads as follows:
    ``(e) Self-defense.
    (1) Homicide or assault cases involving deadly force. It is a 
defense to a homicide, assault involving deadly force, or battery 
involving deadly force that the accused:
    (A) Apprehended, on reasonable grounds, that death or grievous 
bodily harm was about to be inflicted wrongfully on the accused; and
    (B) Believed that the force the accused used was necessary for 
protection against death or grievous bodily harm.
    (2) Certain aggravated assault cases. It is a defense to assault 
with a dangerous weapon or assault in which substantial or grievous 
bodily harm is inflicted that the accused:
    (A) Apprehended, on reasonable grounds, that bodily harm was about 
to be inflicted wrongfully on the accused; and
    (B) In order to deter the assailant, offered but did not actually 
inflict or attempt to inflict substantial or grievous bodily harm.
    (3) Other assaults. It is a defense to any assault punishable under 
Article 89, 91, or 128 and not listed in paragraphs (e)(1) or (2) of 
this rule that the accused:
    (A) Apprehended, upon reasonable grounds, that bodily harm was 
about to be inflicted wrongfully on the accused; and
    (B) Believed that the force that the accused used was necessary for 
protection against bodily harm, provided that the force used by the 
accused was less than the force inflicting substantial or grievous 
bodily harm.''
    (c) R.C.M. 920(g) is new and reads as follows:
    ``(g) Waiver. Instructions on a lesser included offense shall not 
be given when both parties waive such an instruction. After receiving 
applicable notification of those lesser included offenses of which an 
accused may be convicted, the parties may waive the reading of a lesser 
included offense instruction. A written waiver is not required. The 
accused must affirmatively acknowledge that he or she understands the 
rights involved and affirmatively waives the instruction on the record. 
The accused's waiver must be made freely, knowingly, and intelligently. 
In the case of a joint or common trial, instructions on a lesser 
included offense shall not be given as to an individual accused when 
that accused and the government agree to waive such an instruction.''
    (d) R.C.M. 1208(c) is new and reads as follows:
    ``(c) Effective date of sentences. The effective date of portions 
of a sentence adjudged at a new trial, other trial, or rehearing shall 
be calculated without regard to any previous adjudged sentence. The 
effective dates shall not relate back to any previously adjudged 
sentence.''
    Section 2. Part III of the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States 
as amended by E.O. 13825 is further amended as follows:
    (a) Mil. R. Evid. 315(b)(3) is new and reads as follows:
    ``(3) ``Warrant for Wire or Electronic Communications'' means a 
warrant issued by a military judge pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2703(a), 
(b)(1)(A), or (c)(1)(A) in accordance with 10 U.S.C. 846(d)(3) and 
R.C.M. 309(b)(2) and R.C.M. 703A.''
    (b) Mil. R. Evid. 315(d) is amended and reads as follows:
    ``(d) Who May Authorize. A search authorization under this rule is 
valid only if issued by an impartial individual in one of the 
categories set forth in subdivisions (d)(1), (d)(2), and (d)(3). Only a 
military judge may issue a warrant for wire or electronic 
communications under this rule. An otherwise impartial authorizing 
official does not lose impartiality merely because he or she is present 
at the scene of a search or is otherwise readily available to persons 
who may seek the issuance of a search authorization; nor does such an 
official lose impartiality merely because the official previously and 
impartially authorized investigative activities when such previous 
authorization is similar in intent or function to a pretrial 
authorization made by the United States district courts.
    (1) Commander. A commander or other person serving in a position 
designated by the Secretary concerned as either a position analogous to 
an officer in charge or a position of command, who has control over the 
place where the property or person to be searched is situated or found, 
or, if that place is not under military control, having control over 
persons subject to military law or the law of war;
    (2) Military Judge or Magistrate. A military judge or magistrate if 
authorized under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense or 
the Secretary concerned; or
    (3) Other competent search authority. A competent, impartial 
official as designated under regulations by the Secretary of Defense or 
the Secretary concerned as an individual authorized to issue search 
authorizations under this rule.''
    Section 3. Part IV of the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States 
as amended by E.O. 13825 is further amended as follows:
    (a) Paragraph 20.c is amended as follows:
    ``c. Explanation.
    (1) In general. The prevention of inappropriate sexual activity by 
trainers, recruiters, and drill instructors with recruits, trainees, 
students attending service academies, and other potentially vulnerable 
persons in the initial training environment is crucial to the 
maintenance of good order and military discipline. Military law, 
regulation, and custom invest officers, non-commissioned officers, 
drill instructors, recruiters, cadre, and others with the right and 
obligation to exercise control over those they supervise. In this 
context, inappropriate sexual activity

[[Page 30149]]

between recruits/trainees and their respective recruiters/trainers is 
inherently destructive to good order and discipline.
    (2) Prohibited activity. The responsibility for identifying 
relationships subject to this offense and those outside the scope of 
this offense is entrusted to the individual Services to determine and 
specify by appropriate regulations. This offense is intended to cover 
those situations which involve the improper use of authority by virtue 
of an individual's position in either a training or recruiting 
environment. Not all contact or associations are prohibited by this 
article. Service regulations must consider circumstances where pre-
existing relationships (for example, marriage relationships) exist. 
Additionally, this offense only criminalizes activity occurring when 
there is a training or recruiting relationship between the accused and 
the alleged victim of this offense.
    (3) Knowledge. The accused must have actual or constructive 
knowledge that a person was a ``specially protected junior member of 
the armed forces'' or an ``applicant for military service'' (as those 
terms are defined in this offense). Knowledge may be proved by 
circumstantial evidence.
    (4) Consent. Consent is not a defense to this offense.''
    (d) Paragraph 69.c.(1) is amended and reads as follows:
    ``(1) ``Access'' means to gain entry to, instruct, cause input to, 
cause output from, cause data processing with, or communicate with, the 
logical, arithmetical, or memory function resources of a computer, 
computer system, or computer network.''
    (e) Paragraph 89.c.(2) is amended and reads as follows:
    ``(2) Personnel action. For purposes of this offense, ``personnel 
action'' means--
    (a) any action taken against a Servicemember that affects, or has 
the potential to affect, that Servicemember's current position or 
career, including promotion, disciplinary or other corrective action, 
transfer or reassignment, performance evaluations, decisions concerning 
pay, benefits, awards, or training, relief or removal, separation, 
discharge, referral for mental health evaluations, and any other 
personnel actions as defined by law or regulation, such as DoD 
Directive 7050.06 (17 April 2015); or,
    (b) any action taken against a civilian employee that affects, or 
has the potential to affect, that person's current position or career, 
including promotion, disciplinary or other corrective action, transfer 
or reassignment, performance evaluations, decisions concerning pay, 
benefits, awards, or training, relief and removal, discharge, and any 
other personnel actions as defined by law or regulation such as 5 
U.S.C. 2302.''


    Dated: June 21, 2018.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2018-13783 Filed 6-26-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 5001-06-P

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 27, 2018 / Notices 30147

III. Requirements and Limitations for (b) The main International Searching ACTION: Notice of proposed amendments
Participation Authority must not have accepted 100 to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United
Applicants who would like to international applications into the pilot. States (2016 ed.) and notice of public
participate in the pilot project must be The USPTO, in its capacity as the main meeting.
aware of both the following International Searching Authority, will
accept 50 applications during the first SUMMARY: The Department of Defense
requirements to be met by applicants requests comments on proposed
and the following limitations set by the year of the pilot, that is from July 1,
2018, to June 30, 2019, and 50 changes to the Manual for Courts-
IP5 Offices. Martial, United States (2016 ed.) (MCM).
applications during the second year of
A. Requirements To Be Met by the pilot, that is from July 1, 2019, to The proposed changes concern the rules
Applicants June 30, 2020. of procedure and evidence applicable in
(c) The main International Searching trials by courts-martial as well as
The following requirements must be amendments to portions of the MCM
met by applicants wishing to participate Authority must not determine that there
is a defect in the application (e.g., the discussing the punitive articles of the
in the pilot project: Uniform Code of Military Justice. The
(a) The request for participation in the application does not contain a sequence
listing portion of the description and/or approval authority for these changes is
pilot must be submitted on the standard the President. These proposed changes
participation form and filed together a copy of a sequence listing in computer
readable form as provided for in the have not been coordinated within the
with the international application. Department of Defense under DoD
(b) The participation form and the Administrative Instructions under the
PCT) impeding the processing of the Directive 5500.01, ‘‘Preparing,
international application must be filed Processing and Coordinating
at the receiving Office of one of the IP5 application according to the timeline for
the collaborative process. Legislation, Executive Orders,
Offices or at the International Bureau as Proclamations, Views Letters, and
receiving Office, and the applicant must IV. Duration Testimony,’’ June 15, 2007, and do not
select one of the IP5 Offices as the main constitute the official position of the
International Searching Authority under The pilot project is divided into two
phases, a preparatory phase and an Department of Defense, the Military
PCT Rule 35. For example, U.S. Departments, or any other Government
applicants filing with the USPTO or the operational phase. The preparatory
phase started on June 2, 2016, and was agency.
International Bureau as receiving Office DATES: Comments on the proposed
may select the USPTO, the EPO, the dedicated to the administrative and
practical preparations required for a changes must be received no later than
KIPO, or the JPO as International August 27, 2018. A public meeting for
Searching Authority, subject to certain smooth functioning of the pilot. The
operational phase will start on July 1, comments will be held on July 11, 2018,
limitations as described in the PCT at 1:30 p.m. in the United States Court
Applicant’s Guide, Annex C/US. 2018, and will be dedicated to the
processing of applications under the of Appeals for the Armed Forces
(c) Where the participation form and building, 450 E Street NW, Washington
the international application are filed collaborative scheme, the monitoring of
applications for evaluation purposes, DC 20442–0001.
with the USPTO, they must be filed in
and the assessment of the outcome of ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
electronic form via the USPTO’s EFS-
the pilot. The operational phase will last identified by docket number and title,
Web system. The participation form
for a period of three years ending on by any of the following methods:
must be loaded into EFS-Web as a • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
separate document using document July 1, 2021, and will include an
evaluation of the impact of the pilot on www.regulations.gov. Follow the
description ‘‘Request to Participate in instructions for submitting comments.
PCT CS&E Pilot.’’ This is true even examination during the subsequent
national/regional stages. Requests for • Mail: Department of Defense, Office
where the participation form is prepared of the Deputy Chief Management
using WIPO’s ePCT system since EFS- participation in the pilot will be
accepted only during the first two years Officer, Directorate for Oversight and
Web only extracts the PCT Request form Compliance, 4800 Mark Center Drive,
and Fee Calculation sheet from ePCT or of the operational phase, i.e., from July
1, 2018, to June 30, 2020. Mailbox #24, Suite 08D09, Alexandria,
PCT Safe zip files. VA 22350–1700.
(d) The participation form and the Dated: June 21, 2018. Instructions: All submissions received
international application must be filed Andrei Iancu, must include the agency name and
in English when they are filed with the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual docket number for this Federal Register
USPTO. As noted above, the other IP5 Property and Director of the United States document. The general policy for
Offices will initially only accept Patent and Trademark Office. comments and other submissions from
applications filed in English and will [FR Doc. 2018–13800 Filed 6–26–18; 8:45 am] members of the public is to make these
announce when they are prepared to BILLING CODE 3510–16–P submissions available for public
accept applications in languages other viewing on the internet at http://
than English. www.regulations.gov as they are
B. Limitations Set by the IP5 Offices received without change, including any
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
personal identifiers or contact
The following limitations related to information.
organizational aspects of the pilot must Office of the Secretary
be complied with for the main FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES

International Searching Authority to [Docket ID DOD–2018–OS–0039] Lieutenant Alexandra Nica, JAGC, USN,
accept a request for participation in the Executive Secretary, JSC, (202) 685–
Manual for Courts-Martial; Proposed 7058, alexandra.nica@navy.mil. The JSC
pilot: Amendments
(a) The applicant must not have had website is located at http://
ten international applications accepted AGENCY: Joint Service Committee on jsc.defense.gov.
in the pilot by the same main Military Justice (JSC), Department of SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
International Searching Authority. Defense. notice is provided in accordance with

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:58 Jun 26, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM 27JNN1

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 27, 2018 / Notices 30149

between recruits/trainees and their evaluations, decisions concerning pay, www.regulations.gov as they are
respective recruiters/trainers is benefits, awards, or training, relief and received without change, including any
inherently destructive to good order and removal, discharge, and any other personal identifiers or contact
discipline. personnel actions as defined by law or information.
(2) Prohibited activity. The regulation such as 5 U.S.C. 2302.’’ FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
responsibility for identifying
Dated: June 21, 2018. request more information on this
relationships subject to this offense and
Aaron T. Siegel, proposed information collection or to
those outside the scope of this offense
obtain a copy of the proposal and
is entrusted to the individual Services to Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
determine and specify by appropriate Officer, Department of Defense. associated collection instruments,
regulations. This offense is intended to [FR Doc. 2018–13783 Filed 6–26–18; 8:45 am]
please write to ODASD (Supply Chain
cover those situations which involve the Integration), 3500 Defense Pentagon RM
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
improper use of authority by virtue of 1E518, Washington DC 20301–3500,
an individual’s position in either a Anthony VanBuren,
training or recruiting environment. Not DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE anthony.d.vanburen.ctr@mail.mil or
all contact or associations are prohibited (571) 372–5259.
by this article. Service regulations must Office of the Secretary SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
consider circumstances where pre- [Docket ID: DOD–2018–OS–0037] Title: Associated Form; and OMB
existing relationships (for example, Number: Defense Materiel Disposition
marriage relationships) exist. Proposed Collection; Comment Procedures for the Sale of DoD Materiel;
Additionally, this offense only Request DRMS 1645, DRMS 2006, SF 114–A;
criminalizes activity occurring when OMB Control Number 0704–0534.
AGENCY: Under Secretary of Defense for Needs and Uses: This collection
there is a training or recruiting
Acquisition and Sustainment, DoD. allows the Department of Defense (DoD)
relationship between the accused and
ACTION: Information collection notice. and its representatives to assess the
the alleged victim of this offense.
(3) Knowledge. The accused must ability of prospective purchasers to
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
have actual or constructive knowledge comply with applicable laws and
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
that a person was a ‘‘specially protected regulations before the sale of materiel.
Defense Logistics Agency announces a
junior member of the armed forces’’ or Defense Reutilization and Marketing
proposed public information collection
an ‘‘applicant for military service’’ (as Service (DRMS) Form 1645, ‘‘Statement
and seeks public comment on the
those terms are defined in this offense). of Intent,’’ and Standard Form (SF) 114–
provisions thereof. Comments are
Knowledge may be proved by A, ‘‘Sale of Government Property—Item
invited on: Whether the proposed
circumstantial evidence. Bid Page—Sealed Bid,’’ are used to
collection of information is necessary
(4) Consent. Consent is not a defense identify the nature of the purchaser’s
for the proper performance of the
to this offense.’’ business, where the materials will be
functions of the agency, including
(d) Paragraph 69.c.(1) is amended and stored, and what the buyer’s intentions
whether the information shall have
reads as follows: are with the materiel (i.e., use the
‘‘(1) ‘‘Access’’ means to gain entry to, practical utility; the accuracy of the
materiel as intended, re-sell to others,
instruct, cause input to, cause output agency’s estimate of the burden of the
scrap the materiel for recovery of
from, cause data processing with, or proposed information collection; ways
contents, or re-refine or re-process the
communicate with, the logical, to enhance the quality, utility, and
materiel). These forms are used to
arithmetical, or memory function clarity of the information to be
determine if DRMS Form 2006, ‘‘Pre-
resources of a computer, computer collected; and ways to minimize the
Award/Post-Award On-Site Review,’’
system, or computer network.’’ burden of the information collection on
will also be needed; DRMS Form 2006
(e) Paragraph 89.c.(2) is amended and respondents, including through the use
allows DoD components to determine if
reads as follows: of automated collection techniques or
the purchaser is capable of meeting
‘‘(2) Personnel action. For purposes of other forms of information technology.
environmental and hazardous material
this offense, ‘‘personnel action’’ DATES: Consideration will be given to all handling responsibilities, in compliance
means— comments received by August 27, 2018. with CFR part 102 of Title 41.
(a) any action taken against a ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, Compliance with this regulation must
Servicemember that affects, or has the identified by docket number and title, be ascertained before DoD components
potential to affect, that Servicemember’s by any of the following methods: may make an award of hazardous and
current position or career, including Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// dangerous property.
promotion, disciplinary or other www.regulations.gov. Follow the Affected Public: Business or other for-
corrective action, transfer or instructions for submitting comments. profit.
reassignment, performance evaluations, Mail: Department of Defense, Office of Annual Burden Hours: 232.
decisions concerning pay, benefits, the Chief Management Officer, Number of Respondents: 72.
awards, or training, relief or removal, Directorate for Oversight and Responses per Respondent: 2.63.
separation, discharge, referral for mental Compliance, 4800 Mark Center Drive, Annual Responses: 189.
health evaluations, and any other Mailbox #24 Suite 08D09, Alexandria, Average Burden per Response: 1.23
personnel actions as defined by law or VA 22350–1700. hours.
regulation, such as DoD Directive Instructions: All submissions received Frequency: On occasion.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES

7050.06 (17 April 2015); or, must include the agency name, docket
(b) any action taken against a civilian number and title for this Federal Dated: June 21, 2018.
employee that affects, or has the Register document. The general policy Shelly E. Finke,
potential to affect, that person’s current for comments and other submissions Alternate OSD Federal Register, Liaison
position or career, including promotion, from members of the public is to make Officer, Department of Defense.
disciplinary or other corrective action, these submissions available for public [FR Doc. 2018–13838 Filed 6–26–18; 8:45 am]
transfer or reassignment, performance viewing on the internet at http:// BILLING CODE 5001–06–P

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:58 Jun 26, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM 27JNN1

Document Created: 2018-11-06 09:52:38
Document Modified: 2018-11-06 09:52:38

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Action		Notice of proposed amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2016 ed.) and notice of public meeting.
Dates		Comments on the proposed changes must be received no later than August 27, 2018. A public meeting for comments will be held on July 11, 2018, at 1:30 p.m. in the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces building, 450 E Street NW, Washington DC 20442-0001.
Contact		Lieutenant Alexandra Nica, JAGC, USN, Executive Secretary, JSC, (202) 685-7058, [email protected] The JSC website is located at http://jsc.defense.gov.
FR Citation		83 FR 30147

83 FR 30147 - Manual for Courts-Martial; Proposed Amendments

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSEOffice of the Secretary

Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 124 (June 27, 2018)

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary