83 FR 30795 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to Exchange Rule 6.2., Hybrid Opening (and Sometimes Closing) System (“HOSS”)
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 126 (June 29, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 126 (June 29, 2018)
| Page Range | 30795-30801 | |
| FR Document | 2018-13977 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 126 (Friday, June 29, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 30795-30801] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-13977] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-83504; File No. SR-CBOE-2018-045] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to Exchange Rule 6.2., Hybrid Opening (and Sometimes Closing) System (``HOSS'') June 25, 2018. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that on June 15, 2018, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``Cboe Options'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the proposal pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 6.2., Hybrid Opening (and Sometimes Closing) System (``HOSS''). (additions are italicized; deletions are [bracketed]) * * * * * Cboe Exchange, Inc. Rules * * * * * Rule 6.2. Hybrid Opening (and Sometimes Closing) System (``HOSS'') (a)-(h) (No change). . . . Interpretations and Policies: .01 Modified Opening Procedure for Series Used to Calculate the Exercise/Final Settlement Values of Volatility Indexes. All provisions set forth in Rule 6.2 remain in effect unless superseded or modified by this Interpretation and Policy .01. On the dates on which the exercise and final settlement values are calculated for options (as determined under Rule 24.9(a)(5) or (6)) or (security) futures contracts on a volatility index (i.e., expiration and final settlement dates), the Exchange utilizes the modified opening procedure described below for all series used to calculate the exercise/final settlement value of the volatility index for expiring options and (security) futures contracts (these option series referred to as ``constituent options''). (a) Strategy Orders. All orders for participation in the modified opening procedure that are related to positions in, or a trading strategy involving, expiring volatility index options or (security) futures (``strategy orders''), and any change to or cancellation of any such order: (i)-(ii) (No change). Whether orders are strategy orders for purposes of this Rule 6.2.01 depends [[Page 30796]] upon specific facts and circumstances. The Exchange may also deem order types other than those provided above as strategy orders if the Exchange determines that to be the case based upon the applicable facts and circumstances. (b) Non-Strategy Orders. All other orders for participation in the modified opening procedure[s] (``non-strategy orders''), and any change to or cancellation of any such order, must be received prior to the applicable cut-off time (as determined by the Exchange on a class-by- class basis) in order to participate at the opening price for the applicable series, which may be no earlier than 8:25 a.m. and no later than the opening of trading in the option series. The Exchange will announce all determinations regarding changes to the applicable non- strategy order cut-off time at least one day prior to implementation. (c) Market-Makers. A Market-Maker with an appointment in a class with constituent option series may submit bids and offers in those series for bona fide market-making purposes in accordance with Rule 8.7 and the Exchange Act for its market-maker account prior to the open of trading for participation in the modified opening procedure. The Exchange will deem these bids and offers to be non-strategy orders, and will not deem them to be changes to or cancellations of previously submitted strategy orders, if: (i) The Trading Permit Holder with which the Market-Maker is affiliated has established, maintains, and enforces reasonably designed written policies and procedures (including information barriers, as applicable), taking into consideration the nature of the Trading Permit Holder's business and other facts and circumstances, to prevent the misuse of material nonpublic information (including the submission of strategy orders); and (ii) when submitting these bids and offers, the Market-Maker has no actual knowledge of any previously submitted strategy orders. * * * * * The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the Exchange's website (http://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose Cboe Options and Cboe Futures Exchange, LLC (``CFE'') list options and futures, respectively, on different volatility indexes that are calculated using prices of options traded on Cboe Options.\5\ The final settlement value for these derivatives is determined on the morning of their expiration date through a special opening quotation (``SOQ'') of the volatility index using the opening prices of a portfolio of options (for example, the settlement value of VIX options and futures uses the opening prices of a portfolio of S&P 500 Index options (``SPX options'') that expire approximately 30 days later). On the days when the settlement values for these contracts are determined, Cboe Options opens the constituent options \6\ for these volatility indexes using the modified Hybrid Opening System (``HOSS'') procedure.\7\ The main feature of the modified HOSS procedure used to calculate the exercise/ final settlement value of volatility indexes for expiring options and (security) futures that distinguishes it from the normal opening procedure used on all other days is a cutoff time for the entry of strategy orders.\8\ By providing market participants with a mechanism to buy and sell constituent options at prices used to calculate the final settlement value of the volatility index derivatives, the volatility index settlement process is ``tradable.'' --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ These volatility indexes include the Cboe Volatility Index (``VIX'') and the Russell 2000 Volatility Index (``RVX''). Options expire on an expiration date and settle to an exercise settlement value, and futures settle on a final settlement date to a final settlement value. For ease of reference, the Exchange will use the options terminology throughout this filing when referring to the ``expiration/final settlement date'' and ``expiration/final settlement value'' for volatility index derivatives. \6\ ``Constituent options'' are the series used to calculate the exercise/final settlement value of the volatility index for expiring options and (security) futures contracts. \7\ See Rule 6.2, Interpretation and Policy .01. \8\ Strategy orders are all orders (defined in Rule 1.1(ooo) as a firm commitment to buy or sell option contracts) for participation in the modified opening procedure that are related to positions in, or a trading strategy involving, volatility index options or (security) futures (as discussed below, the proposed rule change is adding ``expiring'' to this definition). In general, the Exchange considers orders to be strategy orders if they are for (a) option series with the expiration that will be used to calculate the exercise or final settlement value of the applicable volatility index option or futures contract; (b) option series spanning the full range of strike prices for the appropriate expiration for option series that will be used to calculate the exercise or final settlement value of the applicable volatility index option or futures contract (not necessarily every available strike price); and (c) put options with strike prices at or less than the ``at-the- money'' strike price and for call options with strike prices greater than or at the ``at-the-money'' strike price. Whether orders are strategy orders depends upon specific facts and circumstances. The Exchange may also deem order types other than those provided above as strategy orders if the Exchange determines that to be the case based upon the applicable facts and circumstances. The strategy order cut-off time may be no earlier than 8:00 a.m. and no later than the opening of trading in the series, and is currently 8:20 a.m. Chicago time. See Rule 6.2, Interpretation and Policy .01. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The volatility index settlement process is patterned after the process used to settle SPX options. On the days SPX options expire, S&P calculates an SOQ of the S&P 500 Index using the opening prices of the component stocks in their primary markets. Market participants can replicate the exposure of their expiring SPX options by entering orders to buy and sell the component stocks of the S&P 500 Index at their opening prices. If they are successful, market participants can effectively construct a portfolio that matches the value of the SOQ. At this point, the derivatives and cash markets converge. In a very similar way, the exercise settlement value for volatility index derivatives is an SOQ of the volatility index using opening prices of the constituent options used to determine the value of the index. With respect to VIX, the VIX exercise settlement value is calculated using the opening prices of SPX options that expire approximately 30 days later. Analogous to the settlement process for SPX options, market participants can replicate the exposure of their expiring VIX derivatives by entering buy and sell orders in constituent SPX options. If they are successful, market participants can effectively construct a portfolio of SPX options whose value matches the value of the VIX SOQ. By doing so, market participants may make or take delivery of the SPX options that will be used to settle VIX derivatives. A tradable settlement creates the opportunity to convert the exposure of an expiring VIX derivative into the portfolio of SPX options that will be used to settle the expiring contract. Specifically, some market participants [[Page 30797]] may desire to maintain the vega, or volatility, risk exposure of expiring VIX derivatives. Since VIX derivatives expire 30 days prior to the SPX options used to calculate their settlement value, a market participant may have a vega risk from its portfolio of index positions that the participant wants to continue to hedge after the participant's VIX derivatives expire. To continue that vega coverage following expiration of a VIX derivative, a market participant may determine to trade the portfolio of SPX options used to settle an expiring VIX derivative, since those SPX options still have 30 more days to expiration. This trade essentially replaces the uncovered vega exposure ``hole'' created by an expiring VIX derivative. Since the VIX settlement value converges with the value of the portfolio of SPX options used to calculate the settlement value of VIX derivatives, trading this SPX option portfolio mitigates settlement risk. This is because, if done properly, the vega exposure obtained in the SPX option portfolio will replicate the vega exposure of the expiring VIX derivative (i.e., elimination of slippage). Because a market participant is converting vega exposure from one instrument (expiring VIX derivative) to another (portfolio of SPX options expiring in 30 days), the market participant is likely to be indifferent to the settlement price received for the expiring VIX derivative. Importantly, trading the next VIX derivative expiration (i.e., rolling) will not accomplish the conversion of vega exposure since that VIX derivative contract would necessarily cover a different period of expected volatility and would be based on an entirely different portfolio of SPX options. To replicate expiring volatility index derivatives on their expiration dates with portfolios of constituent options, market participants generally submit strategy orders to participate in the modified HOSS procedure on volatility index settlement dates. The Exchange understands that the entry of strategy orders may lead to order imbalances in the option series being used to determine the final settlement value. To the extent (1) market participants seeking to replicate an expiring VIX derivative position are on one side of the market (e.g., strategy order to buy SPX options) and (2) those market participants' orders predominate over other orders during the modified HOSS procedure, those trades may contribute to an order imbalance prior to the open. To provide market participants with time to enter additional orders and quotes to offset any such imbalances prior to the opening of these series, the Exchange established a strategy order cut-off time.\9\ The time period after this cut-off time also permits market participants to, among other things, update prices of orders and quotes in response to changing market conditions until the open of trading.\10\ Generally, if a series (1) has a market order imbalance, or (2) is at a price that is outside the Exchange prescribed opening width (as described in Rule 6.2(d)), the series will not open for trading. Prior to the open, the Exchange disseminates messages to market participants indicating the expected opening price for a series or imbalance information for that series (as applicable) to further encourage market participants to enter orders and quotes to offset any imbalances, to submit competitively priced bids and offers, and to promote a fair and orderly opening. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 52367 (August 31, 2005), 70 FR 53401 (September 8, 2005) (SR-CBOE-2004-86) (established initially for rapid opening system procedure, which is no longer used). \10\ Pursuant to Rule 6.2, Interpretation and Policy .01(b), the Exchange may determine a non-strategy order cut-off time, which may be no earlier than 8:25 a.m. and no later than the opening of trading. The current non-strategy order cut-off time is the opening of trading. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the options market, it is important for Market-Makers to provide liquidity to execute against orders submitted by other market participants. Pursuant to Rule 8.7, a Market-Maker has general obligations to, among other things, engage (to a reasonable degree under existing circumstances) in dealings for the Market-Maker's own account when there exists, or it is reasonably anticipated that there will exist, a lack of price continuity, a temporary disparity between the supply of and demand for an option (i.e., an imbalance), to compete with other Market-Makers to improve markets in its appointed classes, and to update market quotations in response to changed market conditions in its appointed classes. Certain types of Market-Makers have obligations to facilitate resolution of imbalances and make competitive markets, and the proposed rule change is consistent with those obligations.\11\ As described above, the entry of strategy orders may lead to order imbalances in the option series used to determine the final settlement value for expiring volatility index derivatives. In order for the Exchange's system to open these series for trading (i.e., to resolve order imbalances) and achieve the most competitive pricing in these series, Market-Maker participation in the modified HOSS procedure is important for adding liquidity and promoting a fair and orderly opening and settlement process. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See, e.g., Rules 8.15 and 8.85 (describing obligations of Lead-Market-Makers and Designated Primary Market-Makers, respectively). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange understands that some Market-Makers may hesitate to provide liquidity that could resolve order imbalances, out of a concern that adding such liquidity after the strategy order cut-off time could be deemed either a new strategy order or a modification to or cancellation of an existing strategy order. As a result, this perceived risk may lead to reduced liquidity and may exacerbate the time it takes to open a series at a competitive price.\12\ The proposed rule change encourages Market-Makers to provide liquidity on volatility index derivative settlement days by explicitly stating in Rule 6.2, Interpretation and Policy .01 that bona fide Market-Maker activity does not constitute either a strategy order or a modification to or cancellation of a previously submitted strategy order during the modified HOSS procedure. The Exchange believes Market-Maker liquidity is important to the resolution of order imbalances on volatility index settlement days and to the orderly opening of series on such days, due to the fact that a series cannot open if there is a market order imbalance. Also, Market-Maker liquidity is desirable to advance the opening of series at competitive prices on volatility index settlement days. The Exchange's system also relies on Market-Maker liquidity to open series for trading. Pursuant to Rule 6.2(d), the Exchange's system will not open a series for trading if there are no Market-Maker quotes present. Additionally, the width of the best Market-Maker quotes on the Exchange must be within a certain price range for the System to open a series for trading. The Exchange believes the proposed rule change will incentivize Market-Maker liquidity on volatility settlement days by explicitly stating in the Rules that providing such liquidity will not be deemed to constitute either submission of a strategy order or modification to or cancellation of a previously submitted strategy order. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See Rule 6.2(d). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Specifically, proposed Rule 6.2, Interpretation and Policy .01(c) states a Market-Maker with an appointment in a class with constituent option series may submit bids and offers in those series for bona fide market-making purposes in accordance with Rule 8.7 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''), for its market-maker account prior to the open of trading for participation in the modified opening [[Page 30798]] procedure. The Exchange will deem these bids and offers to be non- strategy orders, and will not deem them to be changes to or cancellations of previously submitted strategy orders, if: (i) The Trading Permit Holder with which the Market-Maker is affiliated has established, maintains, and enforces reasonably designed written policies and procedures (including information barriers, if applicable), taking into consideration the nature of the business of the Trading Permit Holder and other facts and circumstances, to prevent the misuse of material nonpublic information (including the submission of strategy orders); and (ii) when submitting these bids and offers, the Market-Maker has no actual knowledge of any previously submitted strategy orders. In other words, if a Market-Maker submits bids or offers in constituent options on a volatility index derivative settlement day, and if such bids and offers are for its market-maker account and submitted for purposes of its market-making activities on the Exchange (including in accordance with Market-Maker obligations, such as to offset imbalances or provide competitive pricing), the Market-Maker may submit those bids and offers any time prior to the open of trading, including both before and after the strategy order cut-off time. As long as the Trading Permit Holder has appropriate procedures in place both to prevent the Market-Maker from knowing about the submission of strategy orders by other persons within the Trading Permit Holder organization with which it is affiliated, and to prevent other persons from knowing about the Market-Maker's submission of bids and offers, the Exchange will not review such bids and offers for either potential impermissible entry of strategy orders, or cancellations of or modifications to previously submitted strategy orders. Bona fide Market-Maker activity is generally activity consistent with Market-Maker requirements under the Act and Cboe Options Rules:Pursuant to the Act, a market-maker is a specialist permitted to act as a dealer, any dealer acting in the capacity of block positioner, and any dealer who, with respect to a security, holds himself out (by entering quotations in an inter-dealer communications system or otherwise) as being willing to buy and sell such security for his own account on a regular or continuous basis.\13\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(38); see also 12 U.S.C. 1851(d)(1)(B) (market-making is intended to service ``the reasonably expected near-term demand'' of other parties). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to Rule 8.7, a Market-Maker appointed to a class must, among other things, engage to a reasonable degree under existing circumstances in dealings for the Market-Maker's own account when there exists, or it is reasonably anticipated that there will exist, a lack of price continuity, a temporary disparity between the supply of and demand for an option (i.e., an imbalance), to compete with other Market-Makers to improve markets in its appointed classes, and to update market quotations in response to changed market conditions in its appointed classes. Additionally, pursuant to Rule 8.7, all quotes a Market-Maker submits, including prior to the opening, must comply with all requirements, including applicable bid-ask differential and minimum size requirements.\14\ Rule 8.7, Interpretation and Policy .01 imposes an ongoing price continuity requirement on Market-Makers that applies through the opening of trading, as well as during regular trading hours. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ Rule 6.2, Interpretation and Policy .02 permits the Exchange to set different minimum quote size and bid-ask differential requirements for opening quotes as those for intraday quotes. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In addition to these obligations, Market-Makers also effect transactions for the purpose of hedging, reducing risk of, rebalancing, or liquidating their open positions.\15\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ See, e.g., Rule 8.7, Interpretation and Policy .03. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- As noted above, the Exchange implemented the strategy order cut-off time for the operational purpose of providing market participants with time to enter additional orders and quotes to offset any such imbalances prior to the opening of these series.\16\ The Exchange's surveillance procedures to determine market participants' compliance with the strategy order cut-off time are separate and distinct from the Exchange's surveillance procedures to identify potentially manipulative behavior. Therefore, from the Exchange's perspective, whether a Market- Maker's bids and offers constitute strategy orders is distinct from whether the submitting Market-Maker is attempting to engage in manipulative behavior. The classification of bona fide Market-Maker activity as non-strategy orders will have no impact on the Exchange's surveillance procedures to detect activity intended to manipulate the settlement value or violate other Rules. Additionally, all Market-Maker bids and offers, even though not considered strategy orders pursuant to the proposed rule change, will continue to be subject to Exchange surveillance procedures that monitor trading in the option series used to calculate volatility index settlement values on expiration dates, as well as surveillance procedures that monitor Market-Maker activity for compliance with Market-Maker obligations in the Rules. This activity will merely be excepted from Exchange surveillance procedures determining compliance with the operational strategy order cut-off time. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \16\ See supra note 9. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange believes Market-Makers are more likely to interact with and resolve order imbalances on volatility index settlement days if they can be confident that their bids and offers submitted for that purpose will not be deemed strategy orders or cancellations of or modifications to previously submitted strategy orders. As discussed above, the purpose of the strategy order cut-off time is to provide market participants, including Market-Makers, with sufficient time to address imbalances created by strategy orders. Additionally, as discussed above, pursuant to Rule 6.2(d), whether a series opens depends on the presence of Market-Maker quotes at prices no wider than an acceptable price range. Market-Makers are an important source of liquidity on the Exchange, and also have various obligations with which they must comply. The proposed rule change will provide a Market-Maker with an opportunity to provide liquidity on volatility settlement dates and to satisfy their Market-Maker obligations, without concern that the Exchange may consider such activity to constitute the placing of, or cancellations to or modifications of, strategy orders, even if the Trading Permit Holder organization with which the Market-Maker is affiliated submitted a strategy order. The purpose of this proposed change is to accommodate the fact that the Trading Permit Holder with which the Market-Maker is affiliated may submit a strategy order while the Market-Maker may also be submitting bids and offers to accommodate a fair and orderly opening process, by among other things, resolving market order imbalances and submitting competitively priced bids and offers. For example, a Trading Permit Holder organization may have an SPX Market-Maker and a separate volatility trading desk. During the modified opening procedure on a volatility settlement day, the trading strategy of the SPX Market-Maker is to provide markets in SPX options (both before and after the strategy order cut-off time), and the trading strategy of the volatility trading desk may be to replicate Vega exposure by replacing its expiring VIX options positions with positions in the SPX [[Page 30799]] constituent series. To replicate its Vega exposure, the volatility trading desk may enter strategy orders prior to the strategy order cut- off time. These are separate and distinct trading strategies. If the Trading Permit Holder organization has reasonable policies and procedures in place such that the SPX Market-Maker has no knowledge of the volatility trading desk's submission of strategy orders, and that the volatility trader has no knowledge of the SPX Market-Maker's submission of bids and offers, the Exchange believes it is appropriate for the SPX Market-Maker's bids and offers to not be deemed strategy orders, or the modification to or cancellation of the strategy order submitted by its affiliated volatility trading desk. The Exchange does not believe it is necessary to restrict the bona fide market-making activities of a Market-Maker within its appointed classes due to other unrelated trading activities that may involve submissions of orders deemed to be strategy orders of which the Market- Maker has no actual knowledge. The proposed rule change expressly provides that activity related to a Market-Maker's market-making activity in an appointed class will not constitute the submission of a strategy order or the cancellation of or modification to a previously submitted strategy order. The proposed rule change makes clear that a Market-Maker's submission of bids and offers for bona fide market-making purposes in constituent series is permitted on volatility settlement days through the open of trading in the same manner as it is permitted in all in series in its appointed classes at all other times. This will encourage Market-Makers to continue to submit bids and offers through the open, despite other trading activity within the Trading Permit Holder organization. This will also ensure Market-Makers can respond to imbalances and update their quotes \17\ in accordance with their market-making dealings and obligations. The Exchange believes this will contribute to price transparency and liquidity in the option series at the open, and thus will promote a fair and orderly opening on volatility index settlement days. The Exchange continuously evaluates the modified HOSS procedure to identify potential enhancements, and intends to modify the procedure as it deems appropriate to contribute to a fair and orderly opening process. A fair and orderly opening in these series benefits all market participants who trade in the volatility index derivatives and the constituent options. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\ As noted above, the Exchange's system will not open a series if there is no quote or if the opening quote or price is outside an acceptable price range. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The proposed rule change would not eliminate a Market-Maker's requirements to abide by Exchange Rules 4.1 (Just and Equitable Principles of Trade), 4.7 (Manipulation), and 4.18 (Prevention of the Misuse of Material, Nonpublic Information). The requirement in the proposed rule change that the Trading Permit Holder with which a Market-Maker is affiliated must establish, maintain, and enforce policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure the Market-Maker will not have knowledge of the submission of strategy orders is consistent with requirements of Rule 4.18. The Exchange will continue to conduct surveillance to monitor trading in the option series used to calculate volatility index settlement values on expiration dates, including but not limited to, monitoring entry of strategy orders, or modifications to strategy orders, following the cut-off time, as well as compliance with other Rules. The proposed rule change also makes nonsubstantive changes to add paragraph headings and numbering. Additionally, the proposed rule change modifies Interpretation and Policy .01(a) to state that ``strategy orders'' means all orders for participation in the modified opening procedure that are related to positions in, or a trading strategy involving, expiring volatility index options or (security) futures. The addition of the word ``expiring'' is a codification of the Exchange's longstanding interpretation of the term strategy order. As discussed above, to replicate expiring volatility index derivatives on their expiration dates with options portfolios, market participants generally submit strategy orders to participate in the modified HOSS opening process on volatility index settlement dates. The addition of the word ``expiring'' is consistent with the introductory paragraph in Interpretation and Policy .01, which states the modified HOSS procedure applies to series used to calculate the exercise/final settlement value of the volatility index for expiring options and (security) futures, and demonstrates the rule is meant to refer to orders that relate to strategies involving expiring volatility index derivatives. Therefore, the proposed codification is consistent with this general practice, as well as the current rule. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\18\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \19\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \20\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). \19\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). \20\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In particular, the Exchange believes the proposed change will increase liquidity on volatility index settlement dates, as it will remove an impediment that may discourage Market-Makers from submitting bids and offers to offset imbalances and update the prices of their quotes in response to changing market conditions prior to the open. The Exchange believes this additional liquidity may contribute to a fair and orderly opening by increasing execution opportunities, reducing imbalances in constituent options, and increasing the presence of quotes within the acceptable price range, which would benefit all market participants who trade in the volatility index derivatives and the constituent options. The Exchange does not believe it is necessary to restrict the bona fide market-maker activities of a Market-Maker due to other unrelated trading activities by the Trading Permit Holder organization with which it is affiliated. The Exchange notes that the proposed rule change would not impact a Market-Maker's requirements to abide by Exchange Rules 4.1 (Just and Equitable Principles of Trade), 4.7 (Manipulation), and 4.18 (Prevention of the Misuse of Material, Nonpublic Information). The requirement in the proposed rule change that the Trading Permit Holder with which a Market-Maker is affiliated must establish, maintain, and enforce policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure the Market-Maker will not have knowledge of the submission of strategy orders is consistent with requirements [[Page 30800]] of Rule 4.18. As a result, the Exchange does not believe that proposed rule change will be burdensome on Market-Makers. The Exchange believes the proposed rule change will contribute to price transparency and liquidity in the option series at the open, and thus a fair and orderly opening on volatility index settlement days. A fair and orderly opening in these series benefits all market participants who trade in the volatility index derivatives and the constituent options. The proposed rule change to add the term ``expiring'' to the definition of strategy orders is merely a codification of a current Exchange interpretation and is consistent with the definition of constituent options in the current rule. B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition Cboe Options does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Because of the importance of Market-Maker liquidity in the options market and the Exchange's need for competitive quotes to open a series, the Exchange believes it is appropriate for Market-Makers' bids and offers prior to the opening of trading, including after the strategy order cut-off time, not be considered strategy orders, or cancellations to or modifications of previously submitted strategy orders. As discussed above, Market-Makers are subject to various obligations under the Rules, and the proposed rule change provides them with the ability to satisfy these obligations without the risk of their market-making activity being deemed to constitute strategy orders or modifications to or cancellations of strategy orders. The requirement in the proposed rule change that the Trading Permit Holder with which a Market-Maker is affiliated must establish, maintain, and enforce policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure the Market-Maker will not have knowledge of the submission of strategy orders is consistent with requirements of Rule 4.18. As a result, the Exchange does not believe the proposed rule change will be burdensome on Market-Makers. The Exchange does not believe it is necessary to restrict the bona fide market-maker activities of a Trading Permit Holder organization due to its other unrelated trading activities. The proposed rule change has no impact on intermarket competition, as it applies to orders and quotes submitted to an SOQ process the Exchange conducts prior to the open of trading in certain classes. Cboe Options believes that the proposed rule change will relieve any burden on, or otherwise promote, competition. The Exchange believes the proposed rule change will contribute to price transparency and liquidity in constituent options at the open on volatility index settlement days, and thus to a fair and orderly opening on those days. A fair and orderly opening, and increased liquidity, in these series benefits all market participants who trade in the volatility index derivatives and the constituent options. The proposed rule change to add the term ``expiring'' to the definition of strategy orders has no impact on competition, as it is merely a codification of a current Exchange interpretation and is consistent with the definition of constituent options in the current rule. C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \21\ and subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\22\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \21\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). \22\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this requirement. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or Send an email to [email protected]. Please include File Number SR-CBOE-2018-045 on the subject line. Paper Comments Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2018-045. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2018-045 and should be submitted on or before July 20, 2018. [[Page 30801]] For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\23\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \23\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2018-13977 Filed 6-28-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 126 / Friday, June 29, 2018 / Notices 30795
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 10 and All submissions should refer to File ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.11 Number SR–NYSEArca–2018–48. This notice is hereby given that on June 15,
A proposed rule change filed under file number should be included on the 2018, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 12 normally does not subject line if email is used. To help the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘Cboe Options’’) filed
become operative prior to 30 days after Commission process and review your with the Securities and Exchange
the date of the filing.13 However, comments more efficiently, please use Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
pursuant to Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii),14 the only one method. The Commission will proposed rule change as described in
Commission may designate a shorter post all comments on the Commission’s Items I and II below, which Items have
time if such action is consistent with the internet website (http://www.sec.gov/ been prepared by the Exchange. The
protection of investors and the public rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the Exchange filed the proposal pursuant to
interest. Without a waiver of 30-day submission, all subsequent Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 3 and
operative delay, the Exchange’s Pilot amendments, all written statements Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.4 The
Program will expire before the extension with respect to the proposed rule Commission is publishing this notice to
of the Pilot Program is operative. The change that are filed with the solicit comments on the proposed rule
Commission believes that waiving the Commission, and all written change from interested persons.
30-day operative delay for the instant communications relating to the I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
filing is consistent with the protection proposed rule change between the Statement of the Terms of Substance of
of investors and the public interest Commission and any person, other than the Proposed Rule Change
because doing so will allow the Pilot those that may be withheld from the
Program to continue without public in accordance with the The Exchange proposes to amend
interruption in a manner that is provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be Rule 6.2., Hybrid Opening (and
consistent with the Commission’s prior available for website viewing and Sometimes Closing) System (‘‘HOSS’’).
approval of the extension and expansion printing in the Commission’s Public (additions are italicized; deletions are
of the Pilot Program and will allow the Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, [bracketed])
Exchange and the Commission Washington, DC 20549–1090 on official
additional time to analyze the impact of * * * * *
business days between the hours of
the Pilot Program. Accordingly, the 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the Cboe Exchange, Inc. Rules
Commission designates the proposed filing also will be available for * * * * *
rule change as operative upon filing inspection and copying at the principal
with the Commission.15 office of the Exchange. All comments Rule 6.2. Hybrid Opening (and
received will be posted without change. Sometimes Closing) System (‘‘HOSS’’)
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Persons submitting comments are (a)–(h) (No change).
Interested persons are invited to cautioned that we do not redact or edit . . . Interpretations and Policies:
submit written data, views, and personal identifying information from .01 Modified Opening Procedure for
arguments concerning the foregoing, comment submissions. You should Series Used to Calculate the Exercise/
including whether the proposed rule submit only information that you wish Final Settlement Values of Volatility
change is consistent with the Act. to make available publicly. All Indexes. All provisions set forth in Rule
Comments may be submitted by any of submissions should refer to File 6.2 remain in effect unless superseded
the following methods: Number SR–NYSEArca–2018–48 and or modified by this Interpretation and
Electronic Comments should be submitted on or before July Policy .01. On the dates on which the
20, 2018. exercise and final settlement values are
• Use the Commission’s internet calculated for options (as determined
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated under Rule 24.9(a)(5) or (6)) or (security)
rules/sro.shtml); or futures contracts on a volatility index
• Send an email to rule-comments@ authority.16
Eduardo A. Aleman, (i.e., expiration and final settlement
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
dates), the Exchange utilizes the
NYSEArca–2018–48 on the subject line. Assistant Secretary.
modified opening procedure described
[FR Doc. 2018–13984 Filed 6–28–18; 8:45 am]
Paper Comments below for all series used to calculate the
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
• Send paper comments in triplicate exercise/final settlement value of the
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange volatility index for expiring options and
Commission, 100 F Street NE, (security) futures contracts (these option
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
Washington, DC 20549–1090. series referred to as ‘‘constituent
COMMISSION
options’’).
10 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
(a) Strategy Orders. All orders for
11 17
[Release No. 34–83504; File No. SR–CBOE– participation in the modified opening
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6)(iii) requires the Exchange to give the 2018–045] procedure that are related to positions
Commission written notice of the Exchange’s intent in, or a trading strategy involving,
to file the proposed rule change along with a brief Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe expiring volatility index options or
description and the text of the proposed rule Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and (security) futures (‘‘strategy orders’’),
change, at least five business days prior to the date Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
of filing of the proposed rule change, or such and any change to or cancellation of any
shorter time as designated by the Commission. The Rule Change Relating to Exchange such order:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Exchange has satisfied this pre-filing requirement. Rule 6.2., Hybrid Opening (and (i)–(ii) (No change).
12 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). Sometimes Closing) System (‘‘HOSS’’) Whether orders are strategy orders for
13 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
14 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). June 25, 2018. purposes of this Rule 6.2.01 depends
15 For purposes only of waiving the operative
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
delay for this proposal, the Commission has Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 16 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:58 Jun 28, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00113 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM 29JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_30921/page/1.svg)
![30796 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 126 / Friday, June 29, 2018 / Notices
upon specific facts and circumstances. concerning the purpose of and basis for participants with a mechanism to buy
The Exchange may also deem order the proposed rule change and discussed and sell constituent options at prices
types other than those provided above any comments it received on the used to calculate the final settlement
as strategy orders if the Exchange proposed rule change. The text of these value of the volatility index derivatives,
determines that to be the case based statements may be examined at the the volatility index settlement process is
upon the applicable facts and places specified in Item IV below. The ‘‘tradable.’’
circumstances. Exchange has prepared summaries, set The volatility index settlement
(b) Non-Strategy Orders. All other forth in sections A, B, and C below, of process is patterned after the process
orders for participation in the modified the most significant aspects of such used to settle SPX options. On the days
opening procedure[s] (‘‘non-strategy statements. SPX options expire, S&P calculates an
orders’’), and any change to or SOQ of the S&P 500 Index using the
cancellation of any such order, must be A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s opening prices of the component stocks
received prior to the applicable cut-off Statement of the Purpose of, and in their primary markets. Market
time (as determined by the Exchange on Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule participants can replicate the exposure
a class-by-class basis) in order to Change of their expiring SPX options by
participate at the opening price for the 1. Purpose entering orders to buy and sell the
applicable series, which may be no Cboe Options and Cboe Futures component stocks of the S&P 500 Index
earlier than 8:25 a.m. and no later than Exchange, LLC (‘‘CFE’’) list options and at their opening prices. If they are
the opening of trading in the option futures, respectively, on different successful, market participants can
series. The Exchange will announce all volatility indexes that are calculated effectively construct a portfolio that
determinations regarding changes to the using prices of options traded on Cboe matches the value of the SOQ. At this
applicable non-strategy order cut-off Options.5 The final settlement value for point, the derivatives and cash markets
time at least one day prior to these derivatives is determined on the converge.
implementation. In a very similar way, the exercise
morning of their expiration date through
(c) Market-Makers. A Market-Maker settlement value for volatility index
a special opening quotation (‘‘SOQ’’) of
with an appointment in a class with derivatives is an SOQ of the volatility
the volatility index using the opening
constituent option series may submit index using opening prices of the
prices of a portfolio of options (for
bids and offers in those series for bona constituent options used to determine
example, the settlement value of VIX
fide market-making purposes in the value of the index. With respect to
options and futures uses the opening
accordance with Rule 8.7 and the VIX, the VIX exercise settlement value
prices of a portfolio of S&P 500 Index
Exchange Act for its market-maker is calculated using the opening prices of
options (‘‘SPX options’’) that expire
account prior to the open of trading for SPX options that expire approximately
approximately 30 days later). On the
participation in the modified opening 30 days later. Analogous to the
days when the settlement values for
procedure. The Exchange will deem settlement process for SPX options,
these contracts are determined, Cboe
these bids and offers to be non-strategy market participants can replicate the
Options opens the constituent options 6
orders, and will not deem them to be exposure of their expiring VIX
for these volatility indexes using the
changes to or cancellations of derivatives by entering buy and sell
modified Hybrid Opening System
previously submitted strategy orders, if: orders in constituent SPX options. If
(i) The Trading Permit Holder with (‘‘HOSS’’) procedure.7 The main feature
they are successful, market participants
which the Market-Maker is affiliated has of the modified HOSS procedure used to
can effectively construct a portfolio of
established, maintains, and enforces calculate the exercise/final settlement
SPX options whose value matches the
reasonably designed written policies value of volatility indexes for expiring value of the VIX SOQ. By doing so,
and procedures (including information options and (security) futures that market participants may make or take
barriers, as applicable), taking into distinguishes it from the normal delivery of the SPX options that will be
consideration the nature of the Trading opening procedure used on all other used to settle VIX derivatives.
Permit Holder’s business and other facts days is a cutoff time for the entry of A tradable settlement creates the
and circumstances, to prevent the strategy orders.8 By providing market opportunity to convert the exposure of
misuse of material nonpublic 5 These volatility indexes include the Cboe
an expiring VIX derivative into the
information (including the submission Volatility Index (‘‘VIX’’) and the Russell 2000
portfolio of SPX options that will be
of strategy orders); and Volatility Index (‘‘RVX’’). Options expire on an used to settle the expiring contract.
(ii) when submitting these bids and expiration date and settle to an exercise settlement Specifically, some market participants
offers, the Market-Maker has no actual value, and futures settle on a final settlement date
to a final settlement value. For ease of reference, the
knowledge of any previously submitted Exchange will use the options terminology
calculate the exercise or final settlement value of
strategy orders. the applicable volatility index option or futures
throughout this filing when referring to the contract; (b) option series spanning the full range
* * * * * ‘‘expiration/final settlement date’’ and ‘‘expiration/ of strike prices for the appropriate expiration for
The text of the proposed rule change final settlement value’’ for volatility index option series that will be used to calculate the
derivatives. exercise or final settlement value of the applicable
is also available on the Exchange’s 6 ‘‘Constituent options’’ are the series used to
volatility index option or futures contract (not
website (http://www.cboe.com/About calculate the exercise/final settlement value of the necessarily every available strike price); and (c) put
CBOE/CBOELegalRegulatory volatility index for expiring options and (security) options with strike prices at or less than the ‘‘at-
Home.aspx), at the Exchange’s Office of futures contracts. the-money’’ strike price and for call options with
7 See Rule 6.2, Interpretation and Policy .01.
the Secretary, and at the Commission’s strike prices greater than or at the ‘‘at-the-money’’
8 Strategy orders are all orders (defined in Rule strike price. Whether orders are strategy orders
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Public Reference Room. 1.1(ooo) as a firm commitment to buy or sell option depends upon specific facts and circumstances. The
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s contracts) for participation in the modified opening Exchange may also deem order types other than
procedure that are related to positions in, or a those provided above as strategy orders if the
Statement of the Purpose of, and trading strategy involving, volatility index options Exchange determines that to be the case based upon
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule or (security) futures (as discussed below, the the applicable facts and circumstances. The strategy
Change proposed rule change is adding ‘‘expiring’’ to this order cut-off time may be no earlier than 8:00 a.m.
definition). In general, the Exchange considers and no later than the opening of trading in the
In its filing with the Commission, the orders to be strategy orders if they are for (a) option series, and is currently 8:20 a.m. Chicago time. See
Exchange included statements series with the expiration that will be used to Rule 6.2, Interpretation and Policy .01.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:58 Jun 28, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00114 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM 29JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_30921/page/2.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 126 / Friday, June 29, 2018 / Notices 30801
For the Commission, by the Division of the proposed rule change and discussed 2. Statutory Basis
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated any comments it received on the
authority.23 The Exchange believes that its
proposed rule change. The text of these proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
Eduardo A. Aleman, statements may be examined at the of the Act,5 in general, and furthers the
Assistant Secretary. places specified in Item IV below. The objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,6
[FR Doc. 2018–13977 Filed 6–28–18; 8:45 am] Exchange has prepared summaries, set in particular, in that it is designed to
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P forth in sections A, B, and C below, of promote just and equitable principles of
the most significant aspects of such trade, to remove impediments to and
statements. perfect the mechanism of a free and
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE open market and a national market
COMMISSION A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and system, and, in general to protect
[Release No. 34–83516; File No. SR–MRX– Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule investors and the public interest, by
2018–21] Change improving the way its Rulebook is
organized, providing ease of reference in
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq 1. Purpose locating co-location and direct
MRX, LLC; Notice of Filing and connectivity rules, and harmonizing the
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed The Exchange proposes to relocate its Exchange’s Rules with those of the other
Rule Change To Relocate the rules governing co-location and direct Affiliated Exchanges. As previously
Exchange’s Rules Pertaining to Co- connectivity services, which presently stated, the proposed Rule relocation is
Location and Direct Connectivity comprise Section VI, subsections A (co- non-substantive.
location) and B–D (direct connectivity)
June 25, 2018. of the Exchange’s Schedule of Fees. The B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Exchange proposes to establish, within Statement on Burden on Competition
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 its new rulebook shell,3 a new General The Exchange does not believe that
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 8 heading, entitled ‘‘Connectivity,’’ to the proposed rule change will impose
notice is hereby given that on June 13, renumber Section VI, subsection A as any burden on intermarket or intra-
2018, Nasdaq MRX, LLC (‘‘MRX’’ or Section 1 thereunder, and to renumber market competition that is not necessary
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities Section VI, subsections B, C, and D as or appropriate in furtherance of the
and Exchange Commission Section 2(a), (b), and (c) thereunder.4 purposes of the Act. The proposed
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule The Exchange also proposes to update changes do not impose a burden on
change as described in Items I and II internal cross-references in the competition because, as previously
below, which Items have been prepared renumbered Rules. stated, they (i) are of a non-substantive
by the Exchange. The Commission is The Exchange considers it appropriate nature, (ii) are intended to harmonize
publishing this notice to solicit to relocate these Rules to better organize the Exchange’s rules with those of its
comments on the proposed rule change its Rulebook. The other Affiliated Affiliated Exchanges, and (iii) are
from interested persons. Exchanges intend to propose similar intended to organize the Rulebook in a
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s reorganizations of their co-location and way that it will ease the Members’
Statement of the Terms of Substance of direct connectivity rules so that these navigation and reading of the rules
the Proposed Rule Change rules will be harmonized among all of across the Affiliated Exchanges.
the Affiliated Exchanges. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
The Exchange proposes to relocate the
Exchange’s rules pertaining to co- The relocation of the co-location and Statement on Comments on the
location and direct connectivity, which direct connectivity rules is part of the Proposed Rule Change Received From
are presently at Section VI, subsections Exchange’s continued effort to promote Members, Participants, or Others
A (co-location) and B–D (direct efficiency and conformity of its No written comments were either
connectivity) of the Exchange’s processes with those of its Affiliated solicited or received.
Schedule of Fees, to the Exchange’s new Exchanges. The Exchange believes that
moving the co-location and direct III. Date of Effectiveness of the
rulebook shell, entitled ‘‘General
connectivity rules to their new location Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Rules,’’ at new General 8
will facilitate the use of the Rulebook by Commission Action
(‘‘Connectivity’’), Sections 1 and 2,
respectively. Members of the Exchange who are Because the foregoing proposed rule
The text of the proposed rule change members of other Affiliated Exchanges. change does not: (i) Significantly affect
is available on the Exchange’s website at Moreover, the proposed changes are of the protection of investors or the public
http://nasdaqmrx.cchwallstreet.com/, at a non-substantive nature and will not interest; (ii) impose any significant
the principal office of the Exchange, and amend the relocated rules other than to burden on competition; and (iii) become
at the Commission’s Public Reference update their numbers and make operative for 30 days from the date on
Room. conforming cross-reference changes. which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, it has
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 3 Recently, the Exchange added a shell structure become effective pursuant to Section
Statement of the Purpose of, and to its Rulebook with the purpose of improving 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 7 and Rule 19b–
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule efficiency and readability and to align its rules 4(f)(6) thereunder.8
Change closer to those of its five sister exchanges: The
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Nasdaq Stock Exchange, LLC; Nasdaq BX, Inc.;
5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
In its filing with the Commission, the Nasdaq PHLX, LLC; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; and Nasdaq
6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
Exchange included statements GEMX, LLC (together with MRX, the ‘‘Affiliated
Exchanges’’). See Securities Exchange Act Release 7 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
concerning the purpose of and basis for No. 82172 (November 29, 2017), 82 FR 57495 8 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
(December 5, 2017) (SR–MRX–2017–26). 4(f)(6)(iii) requires a self-regulatory organization to
23 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 4 The Exchange notes that as a consequence of give the Commission written notice of its intent to
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). this proposal, it will list its fees, in part, in Section file the proposed rule change, along with a brief
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. VI of the Rulebook and, in part, in General 8. Continued
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:58 Jun 28, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00119 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM 29JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_30921/page/7.svg)
Document Created: 2018-06-29 01:13:58
Document Modified: 2018-06-29 01:13:58
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 30795 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR