83 FR 31913 - Special Local Regulation; Carolina Boat Bash, Little River Inlet, Little River, SC
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 132 (July 10, 2018)
Coast Guard
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 132 (July 10, 2018)
| Page Range | 31913-31915 | |
| FR Document | 2018-14615 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 10, 2018)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 31913-31915] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-14615] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 100 [Docket Number USCG-2018-0163] RIN 1625-AA08 Special Local Regulation; Carolina Boat Bash, Little River Inlet, Little River, SC AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a special local regulation for the Carolina Boat Bash in Little River Inlet, SC. This action is necessary to ensure safety of life on navigable waters during the Carolina Boat Bash. During the enforcement period, no person or vessel may enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the designated area unless authorized by Sector Charleston COTP or a designated representative. DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before August 9, 2018. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG- 2018-0163 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further instructions on submitting comments. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this proposed rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant Justin Heck, Sector Charleston Waterways Management Division, Coast [[Page 31914]] Guard; telephone (843) 740-3184, email Justin.C.Heck@uscg.mil. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Table of Abbreviations CFR Code of Federal Regulations DHS Department of Homeland Security FR Federal Register NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking Pub. L. Public Law Sec. Section U.S.C. United States Code COTP Captain of the Port II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis On February 23, 2018, the Coast Guard was notified by the Freedom Boat Club/DBC about the Carolina Boat Bash, which will be held on August 18, 2018, and will impact waters of the Little River Inlet, Little River, South Carolina. The legal basis for the proposed rule is the Coast Guard's authority to establish special local regulations is 33 U.S.C. 1233. The purpose of the rule is to ensure safety of life on navigable waters of the United States during the Carolina Boat Bash. III. Discussion of Proposed Rule The COTP proposes to establish a special local regulation from 11 a.m. to 6 p.m. on August 18, 2018. The event will consist of live music from two 40' by 20' spud barges. This is expected to be a heavily attended event with an estimated 1200-1400 recreational boats possibly transiting the area. The proposed special local regulation is necessary to ensure the safety of participants, spectators, and vessels from the hazards associated with the event. The duration of the special local regulation is intended to ensure the safety of event participants, the general public, vessels and navigable waters during the event scheduled time frame. Approximately 1400 vessels are anticipated to transit through the event area during that time frame. No vessel or person would be permitted to enter the marked regulated area without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative. The regulatory text we are proposing appears at the end of this document. IV. Regulatory Analyses We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors. A. Regulatory Planning and Review Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt from the requirements of Executive Order 13771. The economic impact of this proposed rule is not significant for the following reasons: (1) Non-participant persons and vessels may enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated area during the enforcement periods if authorized by the COTP or a designated representative; (2) vessels not authorized to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated area may operate in the surrounding areas during the enforcement period; and (3) the Coast Guard will provide advance notification of the special local regulation to the local maritime community by Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to Mariners. B. Impact on Small Entities The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. We have considered the impact of this proposed rule on small entities. This rule may affect the following entities, some of which may be small entities: the owner or operators of vessels intending to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated area during the enforcement period. For the reasons stated in section IV.A. above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. If you think that your business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what degree this rule would economically affect it. Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard. C. Collection of Information This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501- 3520). D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 13132. Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or [[Page 31915]] more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. F. Environment We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a special local regulation on one day lasting from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., prohibiting traffic from approaching the barges. Normally such actions are categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L 63(b) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed rule. G. Protest Activities The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places, or vessels. V. Public Participation and Request for Comments We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking, and will consider all comments and material received during the comment period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or recommendation. We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate instructions. We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the docket, visit http://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice. Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket, and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a final rule is published. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100 Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows: PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS 0 1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows: Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; 33 CFR 1.05-1. 0 2. Add Sec. 100.T07-0163 to read as follows: Sec. 100.T07-0163 Special Local Regulation; Carolina Boat Bash, New River Inlet, SC. (a) Location. This rule establishes a temporary local regulation on all waters within a 500 yard radius of the barge, from which the barge will be placed at position 33[deg]51'.253'' N 078[deg]32'.781'' W in Little River Inlet, Little River, SC. (b) Definition. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the COTP in the enforcement of the regulated areas. (c) Regulations. (1) All persons and vessels are prohibited from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the regulated area unless authorized by the COTP or a designated representative. (2) Persons and vessels desiring to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated area may contact the COTP by telephone at 843-740-7050, or a designated representative via VHF radio on channel 16, to request authorization. If authorization to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated area is granted by the COTP or a designated representative, all persons and vessels receiving such authorization must comply with the instructions of the COTP or a designated representative. (3) The Coast Guard will provide notice of the regulated area by Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-scene designated representatives. (d) Enforcement Period. This rule will be enforced on August 18, 2018 from 11:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m. Dated: June 15, 2018. J.W. Reed, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Charleston. [FR Doc. 2018-14615 Filed 7-9-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 10, 2018 / Proposed Rules 31913
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part (h) Modification or Replacement of TCAS Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516–228–
39 as follows: Processor 7367; fax 516–794–5531.
Within 12 months after the effective date (3) For service information identified in
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS of this AD: Update the software of the this AD, contact Honeywell Aerospace,
Technical Publications and Distribution, M/
DIRECTIVES affected TCAS processor and change the part
S 2101–201, P.O. Box 52170, Phoenix, AZ
number to P/N 940–0351–005, or replace the
85072–2170; phone: 602–365–5535; fax: 602–
■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 affected TCAS processor with a TPA–100B
365–5577; internet: http://
continues to read as follows: TCAS processor P/N 940–0351–005, in www.honeywell.com. You may view this
accordance with the Accomplishment service information at the FAA, Transport
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. Instructions of H4 Aerospace Service Bulletin Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
H4ASB009, Issue 1, dated September 18, Moines, WA. For information on the
§ 39.13 [Amended] 2017; or PMV Engineering Service Bulletin availability of this material at the FAA, call
■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding AVI–00690–SB–S99–R01, Revision 01, dated 206–231–3195.
October 5, 2017, as applicable.
the following new airworthiness Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on July
directive (AD): Note 1 to paragraph (h) of this AD:
3, 2018.
Guidance for accomplishing the actions
Airbus SAS: Docket No. FAA–2018–0589; required by paragraph (h) of this AD can be Michael Kaszycki,
Product Identifier 2018–NM–021–AD. found in Honeywell Service Bulletin 940– Acting Director, System Oversight Division,
0351–34–0005, Revision 2, dated December Aircraft Certification Service.
(a) Comments Due Date
1, 2017. [FR Doc. 2018–14694 Filed 7–9–18; 8:45 am]
We must receive comments by August 24,
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
2018. (i) Parts Installation Prohibition
(b) Affected ADs After modification or replacement of the
TCAS processor as required by paragraph (h)
None. of this AD, no person may install on that
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
airplane an affected TCAS processor, as SECURITY
(c) Applicability
defined in paragraph (g) of this AD.
This AD applies to the Airbus SAS Coast Guard
airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(1) (j) Other FAA AD Provisions
through (c)(4) of this AD, certificated in any The following provisions also apply to this 33 CFR Part 100
category, if modified by H4 Aerospace AD:
supplemental type certificate (STC) [Docket Number USCG–2018–0163]
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
ST03708NY (http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_ (AMOCs): The Manager, New York ACO RIN 1625–AA08
and_Guidance_Library/rgSTC.nsf/0/ Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
581702F96EC93ACF86257FEA00689E6B? AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the Special Local Regulation; Carolina
OpenDocument&Highlight=st03708ny) or procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In Boat Bash, Little River Inlet, Little
PMV Engineering STC ST03835NY (http:// accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your River, SC
rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_ request to your principal inspector or local
Library/rgstc.nsf/0/06E4A762C1FDF Flight Standards District Office, as AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
8048625807D006457C7?OpenDocument& appropriate. If sending information directly ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Highlight=st03835ny). to the manager of the certification office,
(1) Model A318–111, –112, –121, and –122 send it to ATTN: Program Manager, SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
airplanes Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New establish a special local regulation for
(2) Model A319–111, –112, –113, –114, –115, York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, the Carolina Boat Bash in Little River
Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone Inlet, SC. This action is necessary to
–131, –132, and –133 airplanes
516–228–7300; fax 516–794–5531. Before
(3) Model A320–211, –212, –214, –231, –232, ensure safety of life on navigable waters
using any approved AMOC, notify your
and –233 airplanes
appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a during the Carolina Boat Bash. During
(4) Model A321–111, –112, –131, –211, –212, principal inspector, the manager of the local the enforcement period, no person or
–213, –231, and –232 airplanes flight standards district office/certificate vessel may enter, transit through,
(d) Subject holding district office. anchor in, or remain within the
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any designated area unless authorized by
Air Transport Association (ATA) of requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
America Code 34, Navigation.
Sector Charleston COTP or a designated
actions from a manufacturer, the action must representative.
(e) Reason be accomplished using a method approved
DATES: Comments and related material
by the Manager, New York ACO Branch,
This AD was prompted by reports of false FAA; or the European Aviation Safety must be received by the Coast Guard on
resolution advisories (RAs) from certain Agency (EASA); or Airbus SAS’s EASA or before August 9, 2018.
traffic collision avoidance systems (TCASs). Design Organization Approval (DOA). If ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
We are issuing this AD to address the approved by the DOA, the approval must identified by docket number USCG–
occurrence of false RAs from the TCAS, include the DOA-authorized signature. 2018–0163 using the Federal
which could lead to a loss of separation from
other airplanes, possibly resulting in a mid- (k) Related Information eRulemaking Portal at http://
air collision. (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA AD Participation and Request for
(f) Compliance Comments’’ portion of the
2017–0196, dated October 5, 2017, for related
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
Comply with this AD within the information. This MCAI may be found in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
compliance times specified, unless already AD docket on the internet at http:// further instructions on submitting
done. www.regulations.gov by searching for and comments.
locating Docket No. FAA–2018–0589.
(g) Definition of an Affected TCAS Processor FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
(2) For more information about this AD,
For the purposes of this AD, an affected contact Steven Dzierzynski, Aerospace you have questions about this proposed
TCAS processor is defined as a Honeywell Engineer, Avionics and Administrative rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant
TPA–100B TCAS processor having part Services Section, FAA, New York ACO Justin Heck, Sector Charleston
number (P/N) 940–0351–001. Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Waterways Management Division, Coast
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:37 Jul 09, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10JYP1.SGM 10JYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_32045/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 10, 2018 / Proposed Rules 31915
more in any one year. Though this in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION representative via VHF radio on channel
proposed rule would not result in such CONTACT section of this document for 16, to request authorization. If
an expenditure, we do discuss the alternate instructions. authorization to enter, transit through,
effects of this rule elsewhere in this We accept anonymous comments. All anchor in, or remain within the
preamble. comments received will be posted regulated area is granted by the COTP or
without change to http:// a designated representative, all persons
F. Environment
www.regulations.gov and will include and vessels receiving such authorization
We have analyzed this proposed rule any personal information you have must comply with the instructions of
under Department of Homeland provided. For more about privacy and the COTP or a designated
Security Management Directive 023–01 the docket, visit http:// representative.
and Commandant Instruction www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice. (3) The Coast Guard will provide
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Documents mentioned in this NPRM notice of the regulated area by Local
Guard in complying with the National as being available in the docket, and all Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 public comments, will be in our online Mariners, and on-scene designated
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a docket at http://www.regulations.gov representatives.
preliminary determination that this and can be viewed by following that (d) Enforcement Period. This rule will
action is one of a category of actions that website’s instructions. Additionally, if be enforced on August 18, 2018 from
do not individually or cumulatively you go to the online docket and sign up 11:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m.
have a significant effect on the human for email alerts, you will be notified Dated: June 15, 2018.
environment. This proposed rule when comments are posted or a final J.W. Reed,
involves a special local regulation on rule is published.
one day lasting from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100 Port Charleston.
p.m., prohibiting traffic from
approaching the barges. Normally such [FR Doc. 2018–14615 Filed 7–9–18; 8:45 am]
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
actions are categorically excluded from (water), Reporting and recordkeeping BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
further review under paragraph L 63(b) requirements, Security measures,
of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Waterways.
Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01, For the reasons discussed in the ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Rev. 01. A preliminary Record of preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to AGENCY
Environmental Consideration amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
supporting this determination is 40 CFR Part 52
available in the docket where indicated PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON [EPA–HQ–OAR–2018–0225; FRL–9980–53–
under ADDRESSES. We seek any NAVIGABLE WATERS OAR]
comments or information that may lead RIN 2060–AT92
to the discovery of a significant ■ 1. The authority citation for part 100
environmental impact from this continues to read as follows:
Determination Regarding Good
proposed rule. Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; 33 CFR 1.05– Neighbor Obligations for the 2008
1. Ozone National Ambient Air Quality
G. Protest Activities
■ 2. Add § 100.T07–0163 to read as Standard
The Coast Guard respects the First follows:
Amendment rights of protesters. AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Protesters are asked to contact the § 100.T07–0163 Special Local Regulation; Agency (EPA).
person listed in the FOR FURTHER Carolina Boat Bash, New River Inlet, SC. ACTION: Proposed rule.
INFORMATION CONTACT section to (a) Location. This rule establishes a
coordinate protest activities so that your temporary local regulation on all waters SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to
message can be received without within a 500 yard radius of the barge, determine that the Cross-State Air
jeopardizing the safety or security of from which the barge will be placed at Pollution Rule Update for the 2008
people, places, or vessels. position 33°51′.253″ N 078°32′.781″ W ozone National Ambient Air Quality
in Little River Inlet, Little River, SC. Standards (NAAQS) (CSAPR Update)
V. Public Participation and Request for (b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated fully addresses certain states’
Comments representative’’ means Coast Guard obligations under Clean Air Act (CAA)
We view public participation as Patrol Commanders, including Coast section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) regarding
essential to effective rulemaking, and Guard coxswains, petty officers, and interstate pollution transport for the
will consider all comments and material other officers operating Coast Guard 2008 ozone NAAQS. The CSAPR
received during the comment period. vessels, and Federal, state, and local Update, published on October 26, 2016,
Your comment can help shape the officers designated by or assisting the promulgated Federal Implementation
outcome of this rulemaking. If you COTP in the enforcement of the Plans (FIPs) for 22 states in the eastern
submit a comment, please include the regulated areas. U.S. In the final CSAPR Update, based
docket number for this rulemaking, (c) Regulations. (1) All persons and on information available at that time,
indicate the specific section of this vessels are prohibited from entering, the EPA could not conclude that the
document to which each comment transiting through, anchoring in, or rule fully addressed CAA section
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
applies, and provide a reason for each remaining within the regulated area 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) obligations for 21 of the
suggestion or recommendation. unless authorized by the COTP or a 22 CSAPR Update states. This action
We encourage you to submit designated representative. proposes a determination that, based on
comments through the Federal (2) Persons and vessels desiring to additional information and analysis, the
eRulemaking Portal at http:// enter, transit through, anchor in, or CSAPR Update fully addresses this CAA
www.regulations.gov. If your material remain within the regulated area may provision for the 2008 ozone NAAQS
cannot be submitted using http:// contact the COTP by telephone at 843– for all remaining CSAPR Update states.
www.regulations.gov, contact the person 740–7050, or a designated Specifically, EPA proposes to determine
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:14 Jul 09, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10JYP1.SGM 10JYP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_32045/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-11-06 10:18:38
Document Modified: 2018-11-06 10:18:38
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Notice of proposed rulemaking. | |
| Dates | Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before August 9, 2018. | |
| Contact | If you have questions about this proposed rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant Justin Heck, Sector Charleston Waterways Management Division, Coast Guard; telephone (843) 740-3184, email [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 31913 | |
| RIN Number | 1625-AA08 | |
| CFR Associated | Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (Water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR