83 FR 32064 - Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality State Implementation Plans; California; Chico Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan for the 2006 24-Hour PM2.5
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 133 (July 11, 2018)
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 133 (July 11, 2018)
| Page Range | 32064-32067 | |
| FR Document | 2018-14445 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 133 (Wednesday, July 11, 2018)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 32064-32067] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-14445] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 [EPA-R09-OAR-2018-0181; FRL-9980-49--Region 9] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality State Implementation Plans; California; Chico Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan for the 2006 24-Hour PM2.5 Standard AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final action to approve, as a revision of the California state implementation plan (SIP), the State's request to redesignate the Chico nonattainment area to attainment for the 2006 24-hour fine particulate matter (PM2.5 ) National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS or ``standard''). The EPA is also taking final action to approve the PM2.5 maintenance plan and the determination that contributions from motor vehicle emissions in the Chico nonattainment area are insignificant. The EPA is approving this revision because it meets the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or ``the Act'') and EPA guidance for such plans. DATES: This rule is effective on August 10, 2018. ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2018-0181. All documents in the docket are listed on the http://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through http://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability information. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ginger Vagenas, Air Planning Office (AIR-2), Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, (415) 972-3964, [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,'' or ``our'' refer to the EPA. Table of Contents I. Background II. Today's Final Actions III. What are the effects of today's actions? IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. Background On July 18, 1997, the EPA established the first air quality standards for PM2.5 .\1\ The EPA promulgated an annual standard at a level of 15.0 micrograms per cubic meter ([micro]g/m\3\) based on a 3-year average of annual mean PM2.5 concentrations. In the same rulemaking, the EPA promulgated a 24-hour standard of 65 [micro]g/m\3\ based on a 3-year average of the 98th percentile of 24-hour concentrations. On October 17, 2006, the EPA retained the annual average NAAQS at 15.0 [micro]g/m\3\ but revised the 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS to 35 [micro]g/m\3\, based on the 3-year average of the 98th percentile of 24-hour concentrations.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 62 FR 38652. \2\ 71 FR 61144. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Effective December 14, 2009, the EPA established initial air quality designations under subpart 1 of the Act for most areas in the United States for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS, including the Chico area.\3\ \4\ Under subpart 1, within three years of the effective date of designations, states with areas designated as nonattainment for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS are required to submit SIP revisions that, among other elements, provide for implementation of reasonably available control measures (RACM), reasonable further progress (RFP), attainment of the standard as expeditiously as practicable but no later than five years from the nonattainment designation (in this instance, no later than December 14, 2014), as well as contingency measures.\5\ \6\ Prior to the due date for [[Page 32065]] these submissions, the California Air Resources Board (CARB or ``State'') requested that the EPA make a determination that, based on quality assured and certified data from the 2008-2010 period, the Chico PM2.5 nonattainment area had attained the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS.\7\ In addition to requesting a finding of attainment, the State requested that the EPA suspend the attainment- related planning requirements. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ All 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS areas were designated under subpart 1 of the Act. Subpart 1 contains the general requirements for nonattainment areas for any pollutant governed by a NAAQS and is less prescriptive than the other subparts of title I, part D. See 74 FR 58688 (November 13, 2009). \4\ The boundaries for this area are described in 40 CFR 81.305. \5\ See CAA sections 172(a)(2), 172(c)(1), 172(c)(2), and 172(c)(9). \6\ In response to a decision issued by the D.C. Circuit (Natural Resources Defense Council v. EPA, 706 F.3d 428 (D.C. Cir. 2013), the EPA subsequently identified all PM2.5 nonattainment areas for the 1997 and 2006 NAAQS as ``moderate'' nonattainment areas under subpart 4 and established a new SIP submission date of December 31, 2014, for moderate area attainment plans and for any additional attainment-related or nonattainment new source review plans necessary for areas to comply with the requirements applicable under subpart 4. We also noted that the moderate area attainment deadline under subpart 4 is no later than December 31, 2015. See 79 FR 31566 (June 2, 2014). \7\ Letter from James N. Goldstene, Executive Officer, CARB, to Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, EPA Region IX, dated June 2, 2011. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Effective October 10, 2013, the EPA determined that the Chico nonattainment area had attained the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard based on the 2010-2012 monitoring period.\8\ Based on that determination and pursuant to 40 CFR 51.1004(c), the requirements for this area to submit an attainment demonstration, together with RACM, an RFP plan, and contingency measures for failure to meet RFP and attainment deadlines were suspended for so long as the area continued to attain the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS or until the area is redesignated to attainment.\9\ The EPA subsequently issued a determination that the Chico PM2.5 nonattainment area had attained the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS by the applicable attainment date of December 31, 2015, based on 2013-2015 data.\10\ On December 18, 2017, CARB submitted the ``Chico, CA/Butte County PM2.5 Nonattainment Area Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan'' (``Chico PM2.5 Plan'' or ``Plan'') and requested that the EPA redesignate the Chico PM2.5 nonattainment area to attainment for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ 78 FR 55225 (September 10, 2013). \9\ For more information on the regulatory basis for determining attainment of the NAAQS, see the proposed determination of attainment at 77 FR 65651 (October 30, 2012). \10\ 82 FR 21711 (May 10, 2017). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On May 9, 2018, the EPA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking to approve California's request to redesignate the Chico PM2.5 nonattainment area to attainment for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard, as well as proposing to approve California's 10-year maintenance plan for the area.\11\ We also proposed to determine that the emission contributions from motor vehicles are insignificant. The proposed rulemaking set forth the basis for determining that California's redesignation request meets the CAA requirements for redesignation for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard and provided an extensive background on the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard, CAA requirements for redesignation for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard, and their relationship to air quality in the Chico nonattainment area. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ 83 FR 21238. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Our proposed rulemaking also described the complete, quality- assured, and certified air quality monitoring data for the Chico nonattainment area for 2014-2016 showing that this area continued to attain the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard. Certified data for 2017 and preliminary data for 2018 from non-regulatory monitors available on CARB's real-time website are also consistent with continued attainment of the standard.\12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ CARB's real-time AQMIS (Air Quality and Meteorological Information System) database can be found at: https://www.arb.ca.gov/aqmis2/aqmis2.php. AQMIS provides a combination of preliminary real-time data from both non-regulatory and regulatory monitors in addition to historical regulatory data. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received one anonymous comment. After reviewing the comment, we determined that it was outside the scope of our proposed action and that it fails to identify any material issue necessitating a response. The comment has been added to the docket for this action and is accessible at https://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=EPA-R09-OAR-2018-0181. II. Today's Final Actions Based on our review of the Chico PM2.5 Plan submitted by CARB, air quality monitoring data, and other relevant materials, and for the reasons described in our proposed rule, the EPA is approving under CAA section 107(d)(3)(D) the State's request to redesignate the Chico PM2.5 nonattainment area to attainment for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. We are doing so based on our conclusion that the area has met the five criteria for redesignation under CAA section 107(d)(3)(E): (1) The area has attained the 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS in the 2014-2016 time period and has continued to attain the PM2.5 standard since that time; (2) the relevant portions of the California SIP are fully approved; (3) the improvement in air quality is due to permanent and enforceable reductions in emissions; (4) California has met all requirements applicable to the Chico PM2.5 nonattainment area with respect to section 110 and part D of the CAA; and (5) the Chico PM2.5 Plan meets the requirements of section 175A of the CAA. Under CAA section 110(k)(3), the EPA is also approving the Chico PM2.5 Plan as a revision to the California SIP. The EPA finds that the maintenance demonstration shows that the area will continue to attain the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS for at least 10 years beyond redesignation (i.e., through 2030) and that the contingency provisions, which describe the actions that the Butte County Air Quality Management District (BCAQMD) will take in the event of a future monitored violation, meet all applicable requirements for maintenance plans and related contingency provisions in CAA section 175A. The EPA is also taking final action to approve the emission determination that contributions from motor vehicle emissions in the Chico nonattainment area are insignificant. The EPA is finalizing these actions because the SIP revision meets the requirements of the CAA, its implementing regulations, and EPA guidance for such plans. III. What are the effects of today's actions? The EPA's approval of California's redesignation request changes the legal designation of a portion of Butte County (the Chico nonattainment area) for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS, found at 40 CFR part 81, from nonattainment to attainment. Approval of BCAQMD's associated SIP revision also incorporates a plan for maintaining the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS in the Chico area through 2030 into the California SIP. The maintenance plan identifies contingency measures to remedy any future violations of the 2006 24- hour PM2.5 NAAQS. As a result of the EPA's motor vehicle insignificance finding, the Butte County Association of Governments is no longer required to perform regional emissions analyses for either directly emitted PM2.5 or nitrogen oxides as part of future PM2.5 conformity determinations for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS for the Chico area. The EPA's insignificance finding should, however, be noted in the transportation conformity documentation that is prepared for this area. Areas with insignificant regional motor vehicle emissions for a pollutant or precursor are still required to make a conformity determination that satisfies other relevant conformity requirements such as financial constraint, timely implementation of transportation control measures, and project level conformity. IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the [[Page 32066]] Act and applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under Executive Order 12866; does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). We offered to consult with the Enterprise Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California, the Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California, the Mooretown Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California, and the Mechoopda Indian Tribe of Chico Rancheria, which have lands within the Chico PM 2.5 nonattainment area. The tribes did not respond to the EPA's offer to consult. The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 10, 2018. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) List of Subjects 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Ammonia, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. 40 CFR Part 81 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, National parks, Wilderness areas. Dated: June 26, 2018. Deborah Jordan, Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 0 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart F--California 0 2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(506) to read as follows: Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan--in part. * * * * * (c) * * * (506) The following plan was submitted on December 18, 2017, by the Governor's designee. (i) [Reserved] (ii) Additional materials. (A) Butte County Air Quality Management District. (1) ``Chico, CA/Butte County PM2.5 Nonattainment Area Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan,'' adopted October 26, 2017. (2) [Reserved] PART 81--DESIGNATION OF AREAS FOR AIR QUALITY PURPOSES 0 3. The authority citation for part 81 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart C--Section 107 Attainment Status Designations 0 4. Section 81.305 is amended by revising the entry for ``Chico, CA'' in the table entitled ``California--2006 24-Hour PM2.5 NAAQS [Primary and secondary]'' to read as follows: Sec. 81.305 California. * * * * * [[Page 32067]] California--2006 24-Hour PM2.5 NAAQS [Primary and secondary] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Designation \a\ Classification Designated area ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date \1\ Type Date \2\ Type ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chico, CA: Butte County (part)......... August 10, 2018... Attainment........ That portion of Butte County which lies west of the line described as follows: (Mount Diablo Base and Meridian) Beginning at the intersection of the Butte-Yuba county line and the township line common to T18N R6E and T19N R6E, west to the township line common to T18N R6E and T19N R6E, then north along the range line common to R5E and R6E, then west along the township line common to T21N and T20N, then north along the range line common to R4E and R5E, then west along the township line common to T24N and T23N to the Butte- Tehama County boundary. * * * * * * * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \a\ Includes Indian Country located in each county or area, except as otherwise specified. \1\ This date is 30 days after November 13, 2009, unless otherwise noted. \2\ This date is July 2, 2014, unless otherwise noted. * * * * * [FR Doc. 2018-14445 Filed 7-10-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![32064 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 11, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
§ 52.2532 Motor vehicle emissions emissions budgets (MVEBs) for the Environmental Protection on March 14,
budgets. Charleston, West Virginia 8-hour ozone 2011:
(a) EPA approves the following maintenance area submitted by the
revised 2009 and 2018 motor vehicle Secretary of the Department of
Tons per day Tons per day
Applicable geographic area Year (tpd) VOC (tpd) NOX
Charleston Area (Kanawha and Putnam Counties) .................................................................... 2009 16.7 38.9
Charleston Area (Kanawha and Putnam Counties) .................................................................... 2018 13.7 17.1
* * * * * emissions budgets (MVEBs) for the Secretary of the Department of
(e) EPA approves the following Wheeling, West Virginia 8-hour ozone Environmental Protection on March 14,
revised 2009 and 2018 motor vehicle maintenance area submitted by the 2011:
Tons per day Tons per day
Applicable geographic area Year (tpd) VOC (tpd) NOX
Wheeling Area (Marshall and Ohio Counties) ............................................................................. 2009 10.4 9.1
Wheeling Area (Marshall and Ohio Counties) ............................................................................. 2018 9.1 3.1
* * * * * the http://www.regulations.gov website. NAAQS at 15.0 mg/m3 but revised the
[FR Doc. 2018–14743 Filed 7–10–18; 8:45 am] Although listed in the index, some 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS to 35 mg/m3,
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P information is not publicly available, based on the 3-year average of the 98th
e.g., Confidential Business Information percentile of 24-hour concentrations.2
(CBI) or other information whose Effective December 14, 2009, the EPA
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION disclosure is restricted by statute. established initial air quality
AGENCY Certain other material, such as designations under subpart 1 of the Act
copyrighted material, is not placed on for most areas in the United States for
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 the internet and will be publicly the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS,
[EPA–R09–OAR–2018–0181; FRL–9980– available only in hard copy form. including the Chico area.3 4 Under
49—Region 9] Publicly available docket materials are subpart 1, within three years of the
available through http:// effective date of designations, states
Approval and Promulgation of Air www.regulations.gov, or please contact
Quality State Implementation Plans; with areas designated as nonattainment
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS are
California; Chico Redesignation INFORMATION CONTACT section for
Request and Maintenance Plan for the required to submit SIP revisions that,
additional availability information. among other elements, provide for
2006 24-Hour PM2.5 Standard
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: implementation of reasonably available
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Ginger Vagenas, Air Planning Office control measures (RACM), reasonable
Agency (EPA). (AIR–2), Environmental Protection further progress (RFP), attainment of the
ACTION: Final rule. Agency, Region IX, (415) 972–3964, standard as expeditiously as practicable
vagenas.ginger@epa.gov. but no later than five years from the
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection nonattainment designation (in this
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to instance, no later than December 14,
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
approve, as a revision of the California 2014), as well as contingency
or ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
state implementation plan (SIP), the measures.5 6 Prior to the due date for
State’s request to redesignate the Chico Table of Contents
nonattainment area to attainment for the 2 71 FR 61144.
I. Background
2006 24-hour fine particulate matter II. Today’s Final Actions 3 All 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS areas were
(PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality III. What are the effects of today’s actions? designated under subpart 1 of the Act. Subpart 1
Standard (NAAQS or ‘‘standard’’). The IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews contains the general requirements for
EPA is also taking final action to nonattainment areas for any pollutant governed by
I. Background a NAAQS and is less prescriptive than the other
approve the PM2.5 maintenance plan subparts of title I, part D. See 74 FR 58688
and the determination that On July 18, 1997, the EPA established (November 13, 2009).
contributions from motor vehicle the first air quality standards for PM2.5.1 4 The boundaries for this area are described in 40
emissions in the Chico nonattainment The EPA promulgated an annual CFR 81.305.
5 See CAA sections 172(a)(2), 172(c)(1), 172(c)(2),
area are insignificant. The EPA is standard at a level of 15.0 micrograms and 172(c)(9).
approving this revision because it meets per cubic meter (mg/m3) based on a 3- 6 In response to a decision issued by the D.C.
the requirements of the Clean Air Act year average of annual mean PM2.5 Circuit (Natural Resources Defense Council v. EPA,
(CAA or ‘‘the Act’’) and EPA guidance concentrations. In the same rulemaking, 706 F.3d 428 (D.C. Cir. 2013), the EPA subsequently
for such plans. the EPA promulgated a 24-hour identified all PM2.5 nonattainment areas for the
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
1997 and 2006 NAAQS as ‘‘moderate’’
DATES: This rule is effective on August standard of 65 mg/m3 based on a 3-year nonattainment areas under subpart 4 and
10, 2018. average of the 98th percentile of 24-hour established a new SIP submission date of December
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a concentrations. On October 17, 2006, 31, 2014, for moderate area attainment plans and for
the EPA retained the annual average any additional attainment-related or nonattainment
docket for this action under Docket ID new source review plans necessary for areas to
No. EPA–R09–OAR–2018–0181. All comply with the requirements applicable under
documents in the docket are listed on 1 62 FR 38652. subpart 4. We also noted that the moderate area
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:48 Jul 10, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\11JYR1.SGM 11JYR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_32197/page/1.svg)
![32066 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 11, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Act and applicable federal regulations. an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a dioxide, Particulate matter, Reporting
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the Indian country, the rule does not have oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
EPA’s role is to approve state choices, tribal implications and will not impose
40 CFR Part 81
provided that they meet the criteria of substantial direct costs on tribal
the CAA. Accordingly, this action governments or preempt tribal law as Environmental protection, Air
merely approves State law as meeting specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 pollution control, National parks,
federal requirements and does not FR 67249, November 9, 2000). We Wilderness areas.
impose additional requirements beyond offered to consult with the Enterprise Dated: June 26, 2018.
those imposed by State law. For that Rancheria of Maidu Indians of Deborah Jordan,
reason, this action: California, the Berry Creek Rancheria of
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory Maidu Indians of California, the
action’’ subject to review by the Office Mooretown Rancheria of Maidu Indians Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Management and Budget under of California, and the Mechoopda Indian of Federal Regulations is amended as
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, Tribe of Chico Rancheria, which have follows:
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, lands within the Chico PM2.5
January 21, 2011); nonattainment area. The tribes did not PART 52—APPROVAL AND
• is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 respond to the EPA’s offer to consult. PROMULGATION OF
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory The Congressional Review Act, 5 IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
action because SIP approvals are U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
exempted under Executive Order 12866; Business Regulatory Enforcement ■ 1. The authority citation for part 52
• does not impose an information Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides continues to read as follows:
collection burden under the provisions that before a rule may take effect, the Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 agency promulgating the rule must
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); submit a rule report, which includes a Subpart F—California
• is certified as not having a copy of the rule, to each House of the
significant economic impact on a Congress and to the Comptroller General ■ 2. Section 52.220 is amended by
substantial number of small entities of the United States. The EPA will adding paragraph (c)(506) to read as
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 submit a report containing this action follows:
U.S.C. 601 et seq.); and other required information to the
§ 52.220 Identification of plan—in part.
• does not contain any unfunded U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller * * * * *
mandate or significantly or uniquely
General of the United States prior to (c) * * *
affect small governments, as described
publication of the rule in the Federal (506) The following plan was
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Register. A major rule cannot take effect submitted on December 18, 2017, by the
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
until 60 days after it is published in the Governor’s designee.
• does not have Federalism
Federal Register. This action is not a (i) [Reserved]
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. (ii) Additional materials. (A) Butte
1999); 804(2). County Air Quality Management
• is not an economically significant Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean District.
regulatory action based on health or Air Act, petitions for judicial review of (1) ‘‘Chico, CA/Butte County PM2.5
safety risks subject to Executive Order this action must be filed in the United Nonattainment Area Redesignation
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); States Court of Appeals for the Request and Maintenance Plan,’’
• is not a significant regulatory action appropriate circuit by September 10, adopted October 26, 2017.
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 2018. Filing a petition for (2) [Reserved]
28355, May 22, 2001); reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality PART 81—DESIGNATION OF AREAS
• is not subject to requirements of FOR AIR QUALITY PURPOSES
Section 12(d) of the National of this action for the purposes of judicial
Technology Transfer and Advancement review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial ■ 3. The authority citation for part 81
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because continues to read as follows:
application of those requirements would review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to Subpart C—Section 107 Attainment
• does not provide the EPA with the Status Designations
discretionary authority to address enforce its requirements. (See section
disproportionate human health or 307(b)(2).)
■ 4. Section 81.305 is amended by
environmental effects with practical, List of Subjects revising the entry for ‘‘Chico, CA’’ in the
appropriate, and legally permissible table entitled ‘‘California—2006 24-
methods under Executive Order 12898 40 CFR Part 52
Hour PM2.5 NAAQS [Primary and
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). Environmental protection, Air secondary]’’ to read as follows:
In addition, the SIP is not approved pollution control, Ammonia,
to apply on any Indian reservation land Incorporation by reference, § 81.305 California.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
or in any other area where the EPA or Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen * * * * *
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:48 Jul 10, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\11JYR1.SGM 11JYR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_32197/page/3.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 11, 2018 / Rules and Regulations 32067
CALIFORNIA—2006 24-HOUR PM2.5 NAAQS
[Primary and secondary]
Designation a Classification
Designated area
Date 1 Type Date 2 Type
Chico, CA:
Butte County (part) .................................................................................. August 10, Attainment.
2018.
That portion of Butte County which lies west of the line described
as follows: (Mount Diablo Base and Meridian) Beginning at the
intersection of the Butte-Yuba county line and the township line
common to T18N R6E and T19N R6E, west to the township
line common to T18N R6E and T19N R6E, then north along the
range line common to R5E and R6E, then west along the town-
ship line common to T21N and T20N, then north along the
range line common to R4E and R5E, then west along the town-
ship line common to T24N and T23N to the Butte-Tehama
County boundary.
* * * * * * *
a Includes Indian Country located in each county or area, except as otherwise specified.
1 This date is 30 days after November 13, 2009, unless otherwise noted.
2 This date is July 2, 2014, unless otherwise noted.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2018–14445 Filed 7–10–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:48 Jul 10, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\11JYR1.SGM 11JYR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_32197/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2018-07-10 23:54:07
Document Modified: 2018-07-10 23:54:07
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | This rule is effective on August 10, 2018. | |
| Contact | Ginger Vagenas, Air Planning Office (AIR-2), Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, (415) 972-3964, [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 32064 | |
| CFR Citation | 40
CFR
52 40 CFR 81 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Ammonia; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Nitrogen Dioxide; Particulate Matter; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Sulfur Oxides; Volatile Organic Compounds; National Parks and Wilderness Areas |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR