83 FR 32632 - Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products From Brazil: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 135 (July 13, 2018)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 83, Issue 135 (July 13, 2018)
| Page Range | 32632-32634 | |
| FR Document | 2018-15013 |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 135 (Friday, July 13, 2018)] [Notices] [Pages 32632-32634] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2018-15013] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-351-845] Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products From Brazil: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain hot- rolled steel flat products from Brazil. The period of review (POR) is March 22, 2016, through Septemer 30, 2017. This review covers six producers/exporters of the subject merchandise. Commerce selected one mandatory respondent, Companhia Siderurgica Nacional (CSN), for individual examination. We preliminarily determine that sales of subject merchandise have been made below normal value (NV) during the POR. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable July 13, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter Zukowski, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0189. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Scope of the Order The products covered by this investigation are certain hot-rolled steel flat products from Brazil. For a complete description of the scope of this order, please see the accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\1\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See the Memorandum, ``Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Brazil: Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-2017'' (dated concurrently with this Federal Register notice) (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with sections 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be found at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. A list of the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as the Appendix to this notice. Adverse Facts Available Pursuant to section 776(a) and (b) of the Act, Commerce has preliminarily relied upon facts otherwise available with adverse inferences (AFA) for CSN because this respondent did not respond to Commerce's antidumping duty questionnaire. For a complete explanation of the methodology and analysis underlying the preliminary application of AFA, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Adjustment for Export Subsidies In the original investigation, we subtracted from the final dumping margin of 33.14 percent the portion of CSN's countervailing duty rate attributable to export subsidies (4.07 percent) in order to calculate the cash-deposit rate of 29.07 percent.\2\ Since the publication of the Antidumping Duty Order, we have not conducted an [[Page 32633]] administrative review of the countervailing duty order on Hot-Rolled Steel from Brazil.\3\ Therefore, the portion of the countervailing duty rate attributable to export subsidies currently in effect for CSN is 4.07 percent. Further, imports from CSN during the POR were subject to countervailing duties to offset export subsidies of 4.07 percent or more. As such, we have adjusted the dumping margin to ensure that, in accordance with section 772(c)(1)(C) of the Act, we do not collect duties attributable to export subsidies twice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Australia, Brazil, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Netherlands, the Republic of Turkey, and the United Kingdom: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Determinations for Australia, the Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Turkey and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 67962 (October 3, 2016) (Antidumping Duty Order). \3\ This is the first administrative review following the completion of the investigation. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rate for Non-Selected Companies In accordance with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's decision in Albemarle Corp. v. United States,\4\ we are applying to the non-selected companies the adjusted dumping margin we are preliminarily applying to CSN in this administrative review.\5\ This is the only rate determined in this review for an individual respondent, and thus, it is applicable to the non-selected companies under section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act. For a detailed discussion, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Albemarle Corp. v. United States, 821 F.3d 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2016). \5\ See, e.g., Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016, 83 FR 17527 (April 20, 2018). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Results of the Review As a result of this review, Commerce preliminarily determines that for the period March 22, 2016, through Septemer 30, 2017, the following weighted-average dumping margins exist: \6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum for more detail. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted-average Rate adjusted for Exporter and/or producer dumping margin export subsidies ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Aperam South America.............. 34.28 30.21 ArcelorMittal Brasil.............. 34.28 30.21 Companhia Siderurgica Nacional.... 34.28 30.21 Companhia Siderurgica Suape....... 34.28 30.21 Marcegaglia do Brasil............. 34.28 30.21 Usinas Siderurgicas de Minas 34.28 30.21 Gerais SA........................ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure Normally, Commerce discloses to interested parties the calculations performed in connection with the preliminary results within five days of the date of publication of the notice of preliminary results in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). However, there are no calculations to disclose because, in accordance with section 776 of the Act, we have relied on the application of AFA to CSN, the only mandatory respondent subject to this review, for purposes of these preliminary results for CSN. Because the AFA dumping margin is based solely on a dumping margin applied in a prior segment of this proceeding, there are no calculations to disclose. Public Comment Interested parties may submit case briefs not later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.\7\ Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed no later than five days after the time limit for filing case briefs.\8\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\9\ Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed using ACCESS.\10\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii). \8\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1). \9\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). \10\ See 19 CFR 351.303. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS. An electronically-filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by ACCESS by 5 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.\11\ Hearing requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to issues raised in the briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, parties will be notified of the time and date for the hearing to be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230.\12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). \12\ [thinsp]Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of arguments raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the publication of these preliminary results in the Federal Register, unless otherwise extended.\13\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assessment Rates Upon completion of the administrative review, Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.\14\ The final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review and for future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable.\15\ We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of the final results of this review. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b). \15\ See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for each specific company listed above will be that established in the final results of this review, except if the rate is less than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for previously investigated companies not participating in this review, the cash deposit will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the company participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, or the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) [[Page 32634]] investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent segment for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 29.07 percent, the all- others rate established in the LTFV investigation.\16\ These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \16\ See Antidumping Duty Order. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). Dated: July 6, 2018. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Application of Facts Available and Adverse Inferences A. Use of Facts Available B. Application of Facts Available With an Adverse Inference C. Selection and Corroboration of Adverse Facts Available Rate D. Rate for Non-Selected Companies V. Conclusion [FR Doc. 2018-15013 Filed 7-12-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![32632 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 135 / Friday, July 13, 2018 / Notices
Timken Notice Notification to Interested Parties description of the scope of this order,
In its decision in Timken, 893 F.2d at This notice is issued and published in please see the accompanying
341,11 as clarified by Diamond accordance with sections 516A(e)(1), Preliminary Decision Memorandum.1
Sawblades,12 the Court of Appeals for 751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Methodology
the Federal Circuit (CAFC) held that, Dated: July 6, 2018. Commerce is conducting this review
pursuant to section 516A(e) of the Tariff Gary Taverman, in accordance with sections 751(a) of
Act of 1930, as amended (Act), Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Commerce must publish a notice of a and Countervailing Duty Operations, Act). For a full description of the
court decision that is not ‘‘in harmony’’ performing the non-exclusive functions and methodology underlying our
with a Commerce determination and duties of the Assistant Secretary for conclusions, see the Preliminary
must suspend liquidation of entries Enforcement and Compliance.
Decision Memorandum.
pending a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. [FR Doc. 2018–15011 Filed 7–12–18; 8:45 am] The Preliminary Decision
The Court’s June 19, 2018, Final BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Memorandum is a public document and
Judgment constitutes a final decision of is on file electronically via Enforcement
the Court that is not in harmony with and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Commerce’s Final Results. This notice is DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Countervailing Duty Centralized
published in fulfillment of the Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
publication requirement of Timken. International Trade Administration
ACCESS is available to registered users
Amended Final Results [A–351–845] at https://access.trade.gov, and to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
Because there is now a final court Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products room B8024 of the main Department of
decision, Commerce is amending the From Brazil: Preliminary Results of the Commerce building. In addition, a
Final Results with respect to Stanley. Antidumping Duty Administrative complete version of the Preliminary
The revised weighted-average dumping Review; 2016–2017 Decision Memorandum can be found at
margin for Stanley for the period August http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The
1, 2012, through July 31, 2013, is as AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration, signed Preliminary Decision
follows: Memorandum and the electronic
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
version of the Preliminary Decision
Weighted-
average (Commerce) is conducting an Memorandum are identical in content.
Exporter A list of the topics discussed in the
margin administrative review of the
(percent)
antidumping duty order on certain hot- Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
rolled steel flat products from Brazil. attached as the Appendix to this notice.
Stanley .................................. 10.16
The period of review (POR) is March 22, Adverse Facts Available
Commerce will continue the 2016, through Septemer 30, 2017. This Pursuant to section 776(a) and (b) of
suspension of liquidation of the subject review covers six producers/exporters of the Act, Commerce has preliminarily
merchandise pending the expiration of the subject merchandise. Commerce relied upon facts otherwise available
the period of appeal or, if appealed, selected one mandatory respondent, with adverse inferences (AFA) for CSN
pending a final and conclusive court Companhia Siderurgica Nacional (CSN), because this respondent did not respond
decision. In the event the Court’s ruling for individual examination. We to Commerce’s antidumping duty
is not appealed or, if appealed, upheld preliminarily determine that sales of questionnaire. For a complete
by the CAFC, Commerce will instruct subject merchandise have been made explanation of the methodology and
U.S. Customs and Border Protection to below normal value (NV) during the analysis underlying the preliminary
assess antidumping duties on POR. We invite interested parties to application of AFA, see the Preliminary
unliquidated entries of subject comment on these preliminary results. Decision Memorandum.
merchandise exported by Xi’an Metals DATES: Applicable July 13, 2018.
Adjustment for Export Subsidies
and Stanley using the appropriate FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
assessment rates. Peter Zukowski, AD/CVD Operations, In the original investigation, we
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, subtracted from the final dumping
Cash Deposit Requirements margin of 33.14 percent the portion of
International Trade Administration,
As stated in the AR5 Remand U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 CSN’s countervailing duty rate
Redetermination, the cash deposit rate Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, attributable to export subsidies (4.07
for Stanley has been superseded by cash DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0189. percent) in order to calculate the cash-
deposit rates calculated in intervening SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: deposit rate of 29.07 percent.2 Since the
administrative reviews of the publication of the Antidumping Duty
antidumping duty order on certain steel Scope of the Order Order, we have not conducted an
nails from China.13 Thus, we will not The products covered by this
1 See the Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Hot-Rolled Steel
alter Stanley’s cash deposit rate. investigation are certain hot-rolled steel
Flat Products from Brazil: Decision Memorandum
flat products from Brazil. For a complete for Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty
the People’s Republic of China: Analysis Administrative Review; 2016–2017’’ (dated
Memorandum for Stanley,’’ dated concurrently with 14092 (March 16, 2016); Certain Steel Nails from concurrently with this Federal Register notice)
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
this notice. the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
11 See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final 2 See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from
(Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken). Determination of No Shipments and Final Partial Australia, Brazil, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the
12 See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v.
Rescission; 2014–2015, 82 FR 14344 (March 20, Netherlands, the Republic of Turkey, and the
United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) 2017); and Certain Steel Nails from the People’s United Kingdom: Amended Final Affirmative
(Diamond Sawblades). Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Antidumping Determinations for Australia, the
13 See Certain Steel Nails from the People’s Duty Administrative Review and Final Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Turkey and
Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Determination of No Shipments; 2015–2016, 83 FR Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 67962 (October 3,
Duty Administrative Review; 2013–2014, 81 FR 11683 (March 16, 2018). 2016) (Antidumping Duty Order).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:47 Jul 12, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13JYN1.SGM 13JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_32767/page/1.svg)
![32634 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 135 / Friday, July 13, 2018 / Notices
investigation, but the manufacturer is, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Scope of the Order
the cash deposit rate will be the rate The merchandise subject to the Order
established for the most recent segment International Trade Administration is steel wire garment hangers.4 The
for the manufacturer of the [A–570–918] products are currently classifiable under
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
rate for all other manufacturers or Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the United States (HTSUS) subheadings:
exporters will continue to be 29.07 People’s Republic of China: 7326.20.0020, 7323.99.9060, and
percent, the all-others rate established Preliminary Results of Antidumping 7323.99.9080. Although the HTSUS
in the LTFV investigation.16 These Duty Administrative Review; 2016– subheadings are provided for
deposit requirements, when imposed, 2017 convenience and customs purposes, the
shall remain in effect until further AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, written product description of the scope
notice. International Trade Administration, of the order remains dispositive.5
Notification to Importers Department of Commerce. China-Wide Entity
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Commerce’s policy regarding
This notice also serves as a (Commerce) preliminarily determines conditional review of the China-wide
preliminary reminder to importers of that Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd., entity applies to this administrative
their responsibility under 19 CFR Hong Kong Wells Ltd., and Hong Kong review.6 Under this policy, the China-
351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding Wells Ltd. (USA) (collectively, Shanghai wide entity will not be under review
the reimbursement of antidumping Wells) sold subject merchandise in the unless a party specifically requests, or
duties prior to liquidation of the United States at prices below normal Commerce self-initiates, a review of the
relevant entries during this review value (NV) during the period of review entity. Because no party requested a
period. Failure to comply with this (POR), October 1, 2016, through review of the China-wide entity in this
requirement could result in the September 30, 2017. Interested parties review, the entity is not under review
Secretary’s presumption that are invited to comment on these and the entity’s rate is not subject to
reimbursement of antidumping duties preliminary results. change, (i.e., 187.25 percent).7
occurred and the subsequent assessment DATES: Applicable July 13, 2018.
Separate Rates
of double antidumping duties. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Trenton Duncan or Ian Hamilton, AD/ Commerce preliminarily determines
We are issuing and publishing these that information placed on the record by
CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement
results in accordance with sections Shanghai Wells demonstrates that this
and Compliance, International Trade
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 entity is entitled to separate rate status.8
Administration, Department of
CFR 351.221(b)(4). Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue For additional information, see the
Dated: July 6, 2018. NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Gary Taverman, (202) 482–3539, or (202) 482–4798, Methodology
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping respectively.
Commerce is conducting this review
and Countervailing Duty Operations, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B)
performing the non-exclusive functions and
Background of the Act. We calculated constructed
duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
export prices and export prices in
This administrative review is being accordance with section 772 of the Act.
Appendix conducted in accordance with section Because China is a non-market economy
751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary amended (the Act). Commerce Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance,
Decision Memorandum published the notice of initiation of this ‘‘Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the Federal
I. Summary administrative review on steel wire Government,’’ dated January 23, 2018. All deadlines
II. Background garment hangers from the People’s in this segment of the proceeding have been
extended by three days.
III. Scope of the Order Republic of China (China) on December 4 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Steel
IV. Application of Facts Available and 7, 2017.1 On April 26, 2018,2 Commerce Wire Garment Hangers from the People’s Republic
Adverse Inferences partially rescinded the review on 17 of China, 73 FR 58111 (October 6, 2008) (Order).
A. Use of Facts Available companies. Commerce exercised its 5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
B. Application of Facts Available With an discretion to toll all deadlines affected the Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review of Steel Wire Garment
Adverse Inference by the closure of the Federal Hangers from the People’s Republic of China; 2016–
C. Selection and Corroboration of Adverse Government from January 20 through 2017,’’ dated concurrently with and hereby adopted
Facts Available Rate 22, 2018. As a result, the revised by this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
D. Rate for Non-Selected Companies deadline for the preliminary results of 6 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement
V. Conclusion this administrative review is now July 6, of Change in Department Practice for Respondent
Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and
[FR Doc. 2018–15013 Filed 7–12–18; 8:45 am] 2018.3 Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and FR 65963 (November 4, 2013).
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 82 FR 7 See Steel Wire Garment Hangers from the
57705 (December 7, 2017). People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
2 See Steel Wire Garment Hangers from the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013–
People’s Republic of China; 2016–2017; Partial 2014, 80 FR 41480 (July 15, 2015), and
Rescission of the Ninth Antidumping Duty accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum,
Administrative Review, 83 FR 18276 (April 26, unchanged in Steel Wire Garment Hangers from the
2018). People’s Republic of China: Final Results of
3 See Memorandum for The Record from Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2013–
Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for 2014, 80 FR 69942 (November 12, 2015).
Enforcement and Compliance, performing the non- 8 See Shanghai Wells’ January 18, 2018 Section A
16 See Antidumping Duty Order. exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Questionnaire Response at 1–8.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:47 Jul 12, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13JYN1.SGM 13JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/83_FR_32767/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-07-13 01:04:41
Document Modified: 2018-07-13 01:04:41
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Applicable July 13, 2018. | |
| Contact | Peter Zukowski, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0189. | |
| FR Citation | 83 FR 32632 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR